THE VOICE OF REASON
Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
Translate
Showing posts with label French Revolution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label French Revolution. Show all posts
The political and moral system of the West - liberalism - produces matriarchy. Putin pronounced it "obsolete" in June 2019. Trump identified himself as nationalist in October 2019. The 2020 US Presidential elections is really about whether men and women think they should be married parents and nationalists or remain the sexually liberated bachelors and bitter spinsters of liberalism.
Nationalism cannot exist without patriarchy and matriarchy is the product of feminism which rode into town on the coat-tails of liberal egalitarianism.
Liberalism is one of the dangerous ideas of the French Revolution which is about to finally hit the buffers after 300 years.
France for the French Revolution and being responsible for liberalism and neo-liberalism.
The United States for promoting global gay marriage.
The UK for its global empire of usury and the idolatrous and blasphemous religion of Christianity that requires Christians to worship an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God.
The Enlightenment was only a natural reaction against the Wars of the Reformation and the European Wars of Religion and was ended with the French Revolution. There would have been no need for the Wars of the Reformation if Europe had already been Muslim.
In any case, how enlightened were Europeans if they went from Catholicism to Protestantism to the French Revolution without stopping to consider Islam?
If France had been an Islamic State, the conditions that provoked the French Revolution would not have existed. Now that Western Man knows Christianity is kaput, now is the opportunity to trade up to Islam. Secular Koranism is here to make the transition easier. All that is required of Jews is they confirm that Islam is more Noahide than Christianity which it is their religious duty to do.
If Judaism is Monotheism Mark I and Christianity is Mark II, then Islam is Monotheism Mark III, the latest and most advanced model of Monotheism, complete with driver's manual and MoT. Why settle for anything less?
Today is also the Vietnamese New Year. Calendars are very political, I was telling my dear mother when I spoke to her today to wish her a happy Chinese New Year of the Rat.
The Japanese have a maddening calendar whose hours changed according to the time of year which they used for 28 years between 1844 to 1872 before Westernising and celebrating their new year on 1 January like normal people. This reminded me of how the French Revolutionaries drove themselves mad after changing their calendar and measurements. The British are still subject to the metric system. What do people think of my proposal of returning to the imperial system as an assertion of national sovereignty and having our money in pounds, shilling and pence again after rebasing our currency after our Secular Koranist Islamic Revolution? It would make children learn their time tables again, wouldn't it?
For some reason, I am not so keen on adopting the Islamic calendar and am toying with the idea of the Jewish one. (That would mean that this year is in fact 5780 rather than merely 2020.) If we all started celebrating Jewish festivals with Jews, there would be less antisemitism, I am sure. Easter and Christmas are just silly because even Christians don't believe Christ was born on 25 December or that Christ rose from the dead on Easter Bank Holiday Sunday.
Instead of Christians suffering from cultural appropriation, I propose that Jews should now be the new victims of cultural appropriation - for the excellent cause of preventing antisemitism - while we live in a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism.
Think of all the money to be made from Hanukkah candle holders, temporary huts we can get from Homebase/B&Q as well as palm leaves and etrog from Sainsbury's and Tesco!
Of course, the rest of us don't have to keep kosher or halal, but it would help us get along a bit better if we celebrated the same festivals. Islam only gives us a month of fasting on Ramadan and that's it, so there is nothing really to culturally appropriate from Muslims.
I have always thought that Jewish festivals are so much more fun than Christian ones, especially the thing they do with football rattles on Purim!
Please bear in mind that a Torah theocracy would be much harsher and more restrictive than Secular Koranism. If Islam is "Judaism Lite", then Secular Koranism is "Islam Lite". https://t.co/NmH7a3u0iKhttps://t.co/KEgMMKzbM8
The Jewish Torah (the first five books of the Hebrew Bible: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy) serves as a common religious reference for Judaism. Stoning is the method of execution mentioned most frequently in the Torah. (Murder is not mentioned as an offense punishable by stoning, but it seems that a member of the victim's family was allowed to kill the murderer; see avenger of blood.) The crimes punishable by stoning were the following:
Touching Mount Sinai while God was giving Moses the Ten Commandments, Exodus 19:13
An ox that gores someone to death should be stoned, Exodus 21:28
Having a "familiar spirit" (or being a necromancer) or being a "wizard", Leviticus 20:27
Enticing others to polytheism, Deuteronomy 13:7–11
Cursing God, Leviticus 24:10–16
Engaging in idolatry, Deuteronomy 17:2–7; or seducing others to do so, Deuteronomy 13:7–12
"Rebellion" against parents, after repeated warnings, Deuteronomy 21:18–21
Getting married as though a virgin, when not a virgin, Deuteronomy 22:13–21
Sexual intercourse between a man and a woman engaged to another man in a town, since she did not cry out, Deuteronomy 22:23–24; both parties should be stoned to death
Forced sexual intercourse between a man and a woman engaged to another man in a field, where no one could hear her cries and save her, Deuteronomy 22:25–27; the man should be stoned
Describing the stoning of those who entice others to apostates from Judaism, the Torah states:
If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which [is] as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers; [Namely], of the gods of the people which [are] round about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from thee, from the [one] end of the earth even unto the [other] end of the earth; Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him: But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people. And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die; because he hath sought to thrust thee away from the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage.
— Deuteronomy 13:6–10
Quran
"And those who accuse chaste women then do not bring four witnesses, flog them, (giving) eighty stripes, and do not admit any evidence from them ever; and these it is that are the transgressors. Except those who repent after this and act aright, for surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful." — Qur'an, Sura 24 (An-Nur), ayat 4-5
The Qur'an does not mention the act of stoning (Rajm) for any crime.
Contrary to popular belief, the punishment for Adultery (Zina) in the Quran is not stoning to death but flogging with a 100 lashes (if the accuser can provide 4 witnesses to the act). If the accuser cannot produce 4 witnesses, he himself will be punished by flogging with 80 lashes.
"The woman and the man guilty of fornication/adultery,- flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment."
They complain about Cultural Marxism AKA Feminism AKA Intersectionality. Protect yourself from Cultural Marxism with Secular Koranism!
34:00 The antisemitic assumption of this Islamophobic Australian Hindu is that malign Jews would deliberately destroy a civilisation's national identity because that would lower the gentile and elevate the Jew, turning our global village into a globo homo gayplex and Sodom and Gomorrah, and then fleeing to Israel when the balloon goes up. If this is so, these Jews have forgotten about the stumbling block they are not supposed to be putting in the way of anyone at all. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stumbling_block
45:00 Secular Koranism is discussed. Jennifer, do you know any Hindus who have read the Koran? Do you know how much reading of Hindu scripture is required by Brahmin priests and do they have to pass written examinations in this? I suspect most of them are hardly scholars, perhaps barely literate, just masters of theatricality and ceremony. An Islamic scholar would be expected to know the Koran inside out.
46:00 After two or three generations after Secular Koranism has been introduced, the overwhelming majority will believe in the Abrahamic God. I can confidently predict this because parents who don't literally believe in Santa now willingly become the High Priests and High Priestesses of the Cult of Santa at Christmas. Doubtless they will do the same thing when, after Secular Koranism becomes the law of the land, couples marry and go on to bring up the legitimate children that they have living together as a couple. Introducing God to them from a young age will be the equivalent of introducing them to the policeman who will be in their heads for the rest of their lives.
1:01:00 Elliott was asking why I was publicising Halsey's stream on https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2019/01/halsey-english-discusses-secular.html. Obviously, I was doing that in the hope of getting invited on his show and to get the alt-right YouTubers he mentioned to notice the Creator of Secular Koranism. If they have already heard of me, then obviously, I wanted to remind them of Secular Koranism and to emphasise that it is being discussed widely in alt-right circles. They may not like it, but they cannot think of a better solution to all their problems or deny that my diagnosis of the cause of Western malaise is correct. If my diagnoses is accepted as correct, then my prescription for its cure should logically and necessarily be also accepted. I do realise however that society can stay irrational for longer than I can stay alive. Since my ideas are so easy to remember, it would not be the end of the world if I will be no longer be around to be consulted to advise and warn Western governments of the finer points of Secular Koranism to avoid the pitfalls of common or garden sharia as the Muslims interpret it and apply what they erroneously believe to be Islamic principles.
My Grand Plan is to get Jews to promote Secular Koranism out of self interest. Most diasporas Jews in the West like Halsey want to stay where they are. To prevent Western nations from becoming failed states in the turbulent years to come, they must use Secular Koranism to displace the malign matriarchy run by the preferences of immoral and irresponsible women and their ill-bred bastards. Only under a patriarchy would produce enough good strong men to defend the national interest thereby preventing societal collapse. Jews have a particular role in this because they have yet to accept that Israel should be a theocracy.
Once Israel becomes a theocracy, there will be peace with its Arab neighbours, particular when Israel adopts Secular Koranism. Israeli Jews should point to https://quran.com/17/104 as evidence that the Koran is also Zionist. God obviously intends for Jews to live in Israel but Israel must be an independent nation of priests, not the mere colonial outpost of a morally rotten empire promoting global gay marriage and global Sodom and Gomorrah.
No rational Israeli Jew - religious or not- would choose a Torah theocracy because its implementation would mean being stoned to death for every little thing, including breaking the Sabbath. As Prophetess of Secular Koranism, I contend that God if He exists would want Israel to be a theocracy, and will not insist on it being a Torah theocracy, because that would be too hard even on Jews.
Once Israel adopts Secular Koranism, Western nations would follow suit, encouraging China and Russia to do so by example.
In this way will the world be a better place under Global Sharia. (Secular Koranism is basically sharia interpreted by me, a non-Muslim, ex-liberal and ex-feminist agnostic.)
1:07:00 Jennifer: "That's exactly what Claire Khaw does!" Why are you comparing me with Hank Yoo, the Oriental who thinks he is a White Supremacist, whom you say has adopted American culture? Taking an interest in US politics and observing the alt-right as an ethnographer is hardly adopting American culture. What exactly has Yoo done that I have done? Is promoting Secular Koranism adopting Western culture? Perhaps it is, in the best intellectual traditions of Western thought! http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/05/secular-koranism.html
1:10:00 Feminism rode into town on the coat-tails of egalitarianism. Egalitarianism comes from the French Revolution promoting the principles of Equality, Fraternity and Liberty. Feminism had established a matriarchy (ie a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers who did not respect their children enough to prevent them from being born the bastards of people who would have been treated as sex offenders by https://quran.com/24/2) which displaced the patriarchy (ie a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers who want to properly parent their legitimate offspring).
1:13:00 Fascism is one party-ism. The fasces symbol originated from Rome meant to represent national unity and the authority of the state. It can be found in Congress. https://history.house.gov/Exhibitions-and-Publications/House-Chamber/Rostrum/ A Fascist is a Conservative who knows what it takes to promote Conservatism. But what is Conservatism? It is meaningless if it does not include social conservatism, and social conservatism means respecting the practice of marriage and upholding family values which the degenerates of the West are no longer capable of doing because the West is now a matriarchy.
Conservatism was really Theocracy Lite since it Conservatism was a defensive ideology created as a reaction to the ideas of the French Revolution which an anti-clerical revolt when they could no longer stomach the greed and corruption of the Catholic Church and their monarch associated with it. Because of the inferior scripture of the New Testament, no clear principles can be established. Because the Koran is clearly superior in concept and expression, anyone who has read it would be in no doubt as to its principles which easily translates into legislation.
All civilisations rise in patriarchy and decline in matriarchy.
All advanced civilisations are patriarchies; all primitive, declining, extinct or soon to be extinct societies are matriarchies.
The perfect patriarchy - 100% married parents
The perfect matriarchy - 100% unmarried parents
Why are Canadian men more cucked than American men? Because the illegitimacy rate is higher in Canada.
Patriarchy has a pyramid and military command structure that allows orders from above given by the alpha male to be carried out by those below by the beta males. Patriarchy brings about male solidarity and enables male co-operation, allowing a society to deal firmly and effectively with its internal and external enemies.
Sluts and socialists are the eternal enemies of society and civilisation.
Matriarchy is the sea, patriarchy is coastal defences.
In short, it creates a hierarchical society where there is a place for everyone and everyone knows his or her place. There is less conflict in these societies than those who believe in the polite fiction of equality.
Left untreated, the disease of feminism could turn your society back to the barbarism of human civilisation before marriage was invented and could even result in the most extreme matriarchy known to us: the bee colony. We already know that male chicks are destroyed after being hatched in chicken farms. We certainly know that the only thing about feminism that men like is how it lowers the price of sex. Feminism uses sexual liberation to bribe and distract men from the damage it is doing to the civilisation their male ancestors created.
If religion used to be the opium of the people when the West took its religion seriously, then extramarital sex is now the opium of atheist degenerates of the West and those who ape the worst of the West.
This is a good livestream because it is actually about something important ie Jews, Secular Koranism and me, of course. I am basically telling Jews that Secular Koranism could save them from having to all flee to Israel and they won't all fit in there nor will they be able to take their wealth with them since buildings in Manhattan take years to sell anyway. Jews like Halsey want to stay in America and he has expressed a fierce and honourable willingness to fight for it. I only hope that Halsey will be brave enough to one day invite me on his channel.
I take the view that Jews are not being malign by being liberal, just as stupid and clueless as the liberal gentile.
There are more liberals than nationalists everywhere in the West - both Jew and gentile - because there are more stupid people who believe what they are told and people who prefer to go with the flow, everywhere.
Morality is downstream of religion and/or politics.
I have Australian correspondents who solemnly assure me every time the subject comes up that Australian feminists are much much nastier than feminists in other parts of the Anglosphere. It is rather like Northerners in England telling Southerners in England like me that their Muslims are much much nastier than the Muslims found in the South.
I think the problem is a matter of breeding. Australia is a nation of convicts, therefore you would expect the men to have less moral fibre than men of other nations that did not have their origins as a penal colony.
Americans are descended from pioneers, settlers and colonisers and there is more fight from them against the stinking matriarchy than in Australia, it would appear.
But even then the Americans are still terribly pussywhipped.
As for the French, well, I invite you to consider what Zhou Enlai answered when he was asked in the 1970s if the French Revolution was a good thing. He said it was too early to tell.
I trust after the 2017 French Presidential elections that we now have enough information to come to a conclusion.
Liberalism meaningless: the rich think it means freedom from laws and taxes, the poor think it means freedom from poverty and oppression.
Either Liberalism is the same thing as Conservatism or it is not. Anne McElvoy seems to think they are the same.
Do you get the impression that Anne McElvoy uses Liberalism and Conservatism interchangeably? I do.
Is Anne McElvoy's series on British Liberalism just a rehash of her series on British Conservatism?
Listening to Anne McElvoy on British Conservatism/Liberalism, do you get the impression it is just "shit UK governments do"?
British Liberalism and British Conservatism seems to be nothing more than "shit the British government does and thinks".
Anne McElvoy's on Conservatism/Liberalism should be a programme called What Passes for British Political Thought since the French Revolution.
British Conservatism came from an Irishman as a belated response to the French Revolution.
Conservatism is an ideology no older than the American and French Revolutions, which failed to prevent Russian Revolution.
Ask a Western politician or journalist to tell you where Conservatism ends and Liberalism begins, and he will start prevaricating and looking nervous and shifty. Try it yourself if you don't believe me. Predictably, I received no answer from Anne McElvoy when I asked her this question.
@annemcelvoy Where does Conservatism end and Liberalism begin?
Liberalism and Conservatism means whatever Western politicians want it to mean.
Liberalism and Conservatism means motherhood and apple pie to the typical British voter. It therefore means precisely nothing.
In Australia the party closest to Conservatism is called the Liberal Party. Does this mean confusion, incoherence bordering on mania and dementia?
The West whose ideology is Conservatism and Liberalism do not even have an agreed "scripture" for their "religion".
Has Conservaliberalism stood the test of time - all 252 years of it so far?
ISIS have the Koran said to come from God, while the West do not even have an agreed "scripture" for their ideology. Perhaps it can only be found in The Unholy and Unwritten Conservaliberal Book of Making It Up As You Go Along?
There was a reason why the plebs demanded that The Twelve Tables of Romebe placed in a prominent part of the forum so that the operation of Rome's laws would be accessible and foreseeable.
What are Western values? It seems to mean Conservaliberalism which it cannot even agree on or officially define.
Would Edmund Burke be shocked and disgusted that a Conservative Prime Minister has legalised gay marriage?
Liberalism + Conservatism + Wolfowitz Doctrine + Full Spectrum Dominance + Neoconservatism + Neoliberalism = American Imperialism
Can even the most intelligent intellectual defend an ideology that does not have a commonly agreed source?
Is it wise to defend ideologies that are clearly incoherent and make no sense at all which no one can define?
It is clearly unwise to present a programme on these incoherent ideologies relying only on politicians' reminiscences of what was said and done when they were in government and politics without any attempt to define where Conservatism ends and Liberalism begins. Let us call it Conservaliberalism then!
Is PC Liberalism the equivalent of Sexual Liberation and casual fornication leading to widespread bastardy and national degeneracy? Is this the "way of life" the West is so keen on defending?
ISIS hate gay marriage while Conservaliberals seem to be saying they are prepared to defend it to the death. What is the point of defending a practice that would result in racial and national degeneracy which God has already declared to be an abomination in both the Bible and Koran?
Another expression of Conservaliberalism is being in the EU and NATO, irrespective of whether or not it is in the national interest, because, let's face it, these pygmy politicians have no idea what to do outside it, because they have no imagination or principles, and have no idea what the national interest is. They only want to be in office without being in power and only think in terms of elections the way children think of playing musical chairs.
Why do Liberals and Conservatives pretend they can't understand why people hate immigration when they know being hospitable to even family members can be a pain?
Would Victorian Conservaliberals' views on sexual morality be closer that of ISIS than the gay and female advisers of Downing Street?
Did Anne McElvoy mention that the National Liberal Party merged with the Conservative Party in 1947? I don't think so.
The Liberal Nationals also changed their name to National Liberals at this stage. (Their reluctance to take this label originally is said to be a reaction to Lloyd George's use of the name for the earlier National Liberal Party in the 1920s.)
So, Conservaliberalism is a good thing then? Well, it has made the West what it is now ...
If I had been presenting the programme, I would have pointed out that Conservatism was no more than a response to the French Revolution.
Since both Conservatism and Liberalism are the same thing in the mind of Anne McElvoy, we can say that Conservaliberalism is no more than 252 years old. I choose 1763 because that was the beginning of the American Revolution, which the French had a part in. http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/features/americanrevolution/timeline.html
If the French had not fought the Seven Years War then they would not have found their coffers empty and having to replenish them through the imposition of objectionably high taxes.
If Louis XVI had been Caliph of France - a Caliph is a constitutional dictator - and governed Islamically according to all the rules of the Koran, he would not have lost his head.
If Henry Tudor had been Muslim, it would have been no big deal for him to have up to four wives. Think of the number of heads that would have stayed on shoulders and the wars avoided if there had been no Catholic Church for Protestants to protest against and all the religious wars and persecution in Europe that would have been avoided. Forget all the non-Christians the Christians killed, ask yourself how many Christians the Christians killed. It is just possible that Christians killed even more Christians than they killed Muslims. Quite a thought, eh? It was the schismatic nature of Christianity that caused white people to endlessly fight, persecute and kill each other. It was Conservaliberalism that started two World Wars, after all, but Anne McElvoy doesn't mention that either. It is not surprising then that white people became so good at war and took over the world. Now that they only go around hypocritically pretending that they invade oil-rich Muslim countries to save Muslims from themselves and pay mercenaries to fight their wars, they will most probably go the way of the Roman empire.
Was the The Seven Years War fought for Koranically-approved reasons? No, because it only officially permits defensive wars. Sure, go acquire an empire if you want - the Koran allows Muslims conquerors to impose the jizya on their conquered after all, but if you don't win it or can't really afford it, then on your head be it.
Was WW1 fought for Koranically-approved reasons? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_military_jurisprudence Nope. Should Russia have entered it? Nope. If the Russians had had a Caliph of Russia rather than silly Tsar with an equally silly Tsarina carrying on with Rasputin, there would have been no Russian Revolution either.
What do the French now think of their Revolution? Do you know they are now on their fifth Republic? Yep, every time they change their constitution, a new republic is formed, and they have changed their constitution five times already, cos they keep getting it wrong ...
As Zhou Enlai said, it is too early to tell if the French Revolution was a good thing. Since he is dead, perhaps we should ask the French people what they think of the French Revolution now. I did recently and the response was a Gallic shrug.
Does the picture below say anything you might want to say about Conservaliberalism?
