No-hoper London Mayoral Candidate gets more votes than both Eurosceptic candidates added together

Sexy Siobhan

Naughty Nazi Claire

This means a pretty lady is more attractive to Londoners as a protest vote than UKIP and BNP.

Siobhan Benita received 83,914 votes.

UKIP candidate Lawrence Webb received 43,274  votes and the BNP candidate Carlos Cortiglia received 28,751

The combined votes of the Eurosceptic candidates (72,025) is still 11,889 short of the vote for the Pretty Lady.  That is nearly TWELVE THOUSAND VOTES, fellow Londonders!!!

Are most London voters just politically ignorant, stupid, unprincipled, vote with their penises or are they really just not bothered about the EU or immigration?

You tell me.

The logical way to have voted, if you are

1.  against stupid Neocon wars AKA liberal interventionism AKA being America's poodle AKA invading Muslim countries and robbing them of their oil in the name of human rights

2.  wish to withdraw from the EU

3.  concerned about immigration

would have been to vote UKIP (because it is the largest Eurosceptic party) and to vote for Ken (because he declared himself against the invasion of Iraq in no uncertain terms at the anti-war rally in 2003).

That was how I voted.  It therefore enraged me to find a UKIP and BNP supporter (both against the war too) giving their second preference vote to the Pretty Lady, after voting for their own party.

I eventually got the UKIP supporter to admit that he would have voted for Ken if Pretty Lady had not been a candidate.

I received a few outraged squawks from the BNP supporter who voted for the Pretty Lady after I was rather rude to him.  Why should he a BNP supporter, vote UKIP - a bunch of middle class Tories who look down their noses at the white working classes?

My response was not whether his vote would have benefited UKIP, but how it came across to our political classes to whom we want to give the strongest possible message of rejection and disapproval.

Sadly, they will think that in London - supposedly the most sophisticated city in the country - the voters are not that bothered about the issues Eurosceptics are bothered by.

It would appear that London voters are just degenerate tossers easily distracted from their grievances by pretty ladies and that their mayoral voting system is too complicated for the likes of them.

In the event it did not matter, because neither their second preference votes for the Pretty Lady would have been counted anyway.  However, the fact remains that they wasted their vote on a Pretty Lady when they could have cast it for Ken to make an anti-war point.

Had Ken won, it would have been delicious to point out to him that he owed his success to the Eurosceptic parties that he likes to call racist, fascist Nazi extremists.

POST MORTEM

What should the Eurosceptic parties have done to get a better result?

The BNP should have not expelled me and instead hung on to me as their mayoral candidate for dear life and supported me with all their heart and strength, obviously.  I would have changed the perception of British nationalism from being merely racist and xenophobic to something more intellectual, moral and sophisticated.

Failing that, UKIP should have admitted me and made me their mayoral candidate, and I would have got them some BNP votes too, as well as a goodly number of Muslim ones, for my knowledge of the Koran has been acknowledged, even by Muslim scholars.

But it was not to be, because both their leaders decided to play it safe.   It is quite clear to me now that most Londoners would have been prepared to be entertained and stimulated by my views on eugenics and arguments against feminism.  I may not be as sexy as Siobhan but I can be both funny and intellectually stimulating.

When a tidal wave or an avalanche is coming your way, I would suggest that the safest thing to do is not to stay exactly where you are and do and say exactly what you have done before ie being boring.  

2012 London Mayoral Elections proves Democracy a pernicious nonsense

http://www.lbc.co.uk/ukip-mistake-led-to-name-being-left-off-mayoral-ballot-paper-54492?fb_comment_id=fbc_10150812780833819_22053957_10150812810933819#f2603aac

http://www.lbc.co.uk/how-london-boroughs-voted-in-mayoral-election-54493

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-17961960

So today has shown that Londoners can't resist a toff who has been on TV and behaves more like a comedian than a serous politician.

It has also shown that most people gave their second vote to an air-head dolly bird whom they would secretly or not so secretly have sex with, for Siobhan Benita has all the attributes of a yummy mummy.

It has of course been a TERRIBLE result for the candidates of Eurosceptic parties whose combined vote would not have exceeded that of the pretty lady's.

I like to think that if I had remained the BNP London Mayoral Candidate I would have given the media a run for the money and said the things I felt needed to be said, particularly when answering the questions asked by Pink News readers.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/my-answers-to-pinknews-readers.html

I would certainly not have answered the questions like a mainstream politician of the LibLabCon, which was what Carlos ended up doing, for shame, for shame.

I would have discussed the eugenic purpose of the institution of marriage and invited the British to consider the reasons for their disgusting degeneracy, and suggest that they abolish their overweening nanny state for the sake of future generations.

It is sad to watch the BNP throwing away all the electoral advantage of being a fringe party who, like UKIP, tried to pass themselves off as an establishment party which meant being DEADLY DULL.

And that is why London voters voted for the pretty lady instead of the strange Uruguayan man at the BNP or the dullard Fresh Choice for London candidate.

Will Self at http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01gvwyj tells us it is not safe to be too safe and boring, because what happens is that the voter will be so bored he will just vote for the person they find most ENTERTAINING or FUCKABLE.

I may be no spring chicken but I think I can still probably do both if I lose a bit of weight, go more regularly to the hairdresser and tart myself up, better than anyone else in the political establishment.   I would win too, because I am prepared to take risks, and carry it off with aplomb, unlike the dullards and cowards who infest the Eurosceptic parties, who either think I am racially inferior or are just terrified that I might use their party as a launchpad to take over their country after I have abolished their laughable and contemptible political system called representative democracy, as indeed I would ....

How Ken can mop up a few more votes and give Boris a haircut on May 3

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/apr/25/ken-livingstone-elect-chat-show-host?CMP=twt_gu

We could have a recorded debate on immigration, Islam, the war, the economy, law and order, the Americanisation AKA dumbing down of British politics, how he sees the future etc.  Or he could just allow me to interview him and blog about it.

If he wants me only at arm's length we can do this by Twitter or Facebook.

Over to you, Ken, to mop up votes from "Far Right" Londoners if you position yourself with just the right choice of words.

The only thing Ken has done that the BNP would approve of is his anti-war stance, which is in agreement with their own.

Boris hasn't even got that because that twerp voted for the war.  

Now is the time to see if all London voters care about is their own pleasures and their own comfort and that they don't give a damn about messing up other people's countries and ruining their lives.  

For all London voters who hate the war and what is being done in their name voting for Ken ought to be a no-brainer.

Now is the time to see if Londoners are mere sheeple dazzled by the public school charm of their Etonian mayor (with Prime Ministerial ambitions) who always makes a point of shying away from discussing controversial subjects and who VOTED FOR THE WAR, unlike Our Wise, Courageous and Independent-minded Ken.

My ten policies if I had been the BNP London Mayoral Candidate instead of Carlos Cortiglia

1. I would establish a super-brothel like Pascha as a job creation scheme for London's Slut Single Mums.    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascha_(brothel) 
2. I would introduce the Tuk Tuk.   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auto_rickshaw
3. I would allow citizens to set up their own borough-based militia to deal with the next lot of rioting.    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens%27_Militia
4. I would set up patrols of Pavement Police to fine drunken and vomiting Pavement Users. 
5. I would firm up the laws to make a citizen's arrests easier for the arresting citizen.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen's_arrest#United_Kingdom
6. I would set up debating societies in every London borough and promise to attend an event at each debating society at least once in my term.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_borough  
7. I would set up a marriage bureau in every London borough to make it easier for decent Londoners of the marrying kind to meet each other.
8. I would London the first city in Britain to try out the Marriage Contract.  (Lots of lovely legal fees for London lawyers!)
9. I would set up a marriage counselling service in every London borough to help those whose marriages have hit rocky patches.
10. I would set up a London Blind Date Association.   Prospective husbands would make offers of marriage to prospective wives who would be wearing a niqab, but only after their questions have been answered to their satisfaction. These women would of course also have a list of questions for the men about their prospects, property and ambitions. It would be a bit like Blind Date but with the contestants wearing the niqab, even if they are not Muslim. This would be when deportment, wit, learning and personality would come into its own.  Only when an offer has been made and accepted would the niqab be removed to reveal the features and the form of the woman concerned. As Mayoress of London I claim the right to be Mistress of Ceremony.  It will be great fun, fellow Londoners!  

Reasons why London Nationalists and Muslims should vote for Ken Livingstone as their first choice

1. Our Ken has been consistently against the wars the LibLabCon warmongers (who are fools and knaves) have been enthusiastically and mindlessly promoting.  (My BNP-supporting readers should remember that the BNP policy has always been consistently against the wars in Afraqbya.) 
2. His political positioning over the years has been brilliant.   
3. He is charismatic and charming.  I once saw him surrounded by admirers at a Statesman party.
4. He was rude to a liberal Jewish journalist from the Evening Standard by calling him a "Nazi" and got away with it!    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6065124.stm  Anti-semitic nationalists might regard this as something in Ken's favour.
5. Ken is very much his own man and doesn't have to toe the line of the Labour Party now being led by the egregious and charisma-free zone, Ed Miliband.  
6. Ken is clever, Ken is ruthless and is not afraid of doing unpopular things after calculating the risk, usually accurately.
7. Ken has nicer hair than Boris.   
8. Ken is bribing Londoners with lower fares, a bribe that all Londoners should be happy to accept, I would have thought.  It is now too late for Boris to bribe Londoners with cheaper fares because Ken has beaten him to it.   
9. Boris voted for the war in Iraq and Afghanistan and sucked up to the Muslims in the most nauseating way.   
10. All good London Muslims should abhor the wars waged by the West against the ummah.
11. All good London nationalists should abhor the wars that get young white men killed for Bush, Blair, Brown, Obama, Cameron, Clegg, Israel and the respective military industrial complexes of the US and UK.
12. Ken is able to read the writing on the wall quicker and more accurately than any of the London mayoral candidates or indeed any UK politician I can think of.   He is really a bit of futurologist, like me.   If it were up to me, I would make Ken Foreign Secretary for life, instead of that ridiculous William Hague with his droning pompous important voice.   
13. Ken has read the Islamic writing on the wall and is acting on it.     http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/andrewgilligan/100144946/ken-livingstone-i-will-make-london-a-beacon-of-islam/
14. Ken supported Lutfur Rahman (who is a smart operator like Ken) who had been suspended from the Labour Party without good reason and did a walkabout with him to the horror and consternation of the Labour Party.   http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2010/10/which-tower-hamlets-mayoral-candidate.html   This means Lutfur will return the favour by getting his people to support him.
15. Voters of the Right and Left who hate stupid pointless wars should vote for Ken to distance themselves from the wars that only make Britain poorer and more despised in the world.   
16. Ken is not an Etonian piece of shit like Boris and Cameron.   
17. I would work for Ken if he asked me, because I actually admire him.  I could do him a lot of good since Muslims and Nationalists are increasingly taking more of an interest in what I say about British politics, Islam and nationalism and the dementia that is now afflicting the thinking of liberal-feminist politicians who are afraid of SSMs.

How interesting that so many people appear to prefer a less successful toff than a genuinely wily political operator who has a proven track record of getting and staying in power but who is not a toff.  

That was probably why the Tories voted for Cameron as their leader when he was devoid of policies and shunned David Davis who said all the right things a proper Tory should. They were all mesmerised by the poshness and toffiness of an unprincipled Etonian shit, I suppose, the fools.

Most of voters don't care about policy, and certainly not foreign policy - until it bites them in the bum when they lose a war.   All they see is the shine of the slimey politician, and they have never read Shakespeare or even heard of the saying "All that glisters is not gold", because they are mostly dumbed down sluts and bastards now.   

At least Islam has the possibility of remoralising the sluts and bastards of Britain that the toffs are too frightened to tell off.

http://www.yourken.org/volunteer

Help me help Ken become the Mayor of London, and give Boris a haircut!