Does Help for Heroes fall foul of s 5 of the Public Order Act 1986?

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/64/section/5

5 Harassment, alarm or distress.

(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—
(a)uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or
(b)displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting,within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby.

http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/how-we-help/

HOW WE HELP OUR HEROES

Our mission is to deliver an enduring national network of support for our wounded and their families. We will inspire and enable those who have made sacrifices on our behalf to achieve their full potential.

The war in Afghanistan may be over, but for those who have suffered life-changing injuries, their battles are just beginning.

We've estimated that, of the 220,560 individuals deployed to Afghanistan and Iraq between 2001 and 2014, up to 75,000 servicemen and women (and their families) may need our support in the future. We will not let them fight these battles alone.

@secular_hero @anjemchoudary It is asinine to declare that all soldiers are heroes.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@ant1969salford @anjemchoudary That wristband says all soldiers are heroes.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@jollywoger @anjemchoudary If you wear a badge that says all soldiers are heroes it means you approve of all wars.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@secular_hero @anjemchoudary The name HELP FOR HEROES implies that all soldiers injured invading Muslims countries are heroes, geddit?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@secular_hero @anjemchoudary The name of that military charity has POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS by saying soldiers are heroes.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@secular_hero @anjemchoudary Islamophobes think soldiers who kill Muslims in the process of invading their lands are heroes, don't you?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@secular_hero @anjemchoudary You actually want more soldiers to kill more Muslims and call them heroes. I don't expect you to agree with me.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@stephc47 @anjemchoudary Any organisation that calls soldiers who are injured invading Muslim countries *heroes* makes its position clear.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@stephc47 @anjemchoudary There are plenty of non-Muslims who do not agree with invading Iraq and Afghanistan. @STWuk @Corbyn4Leader

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@stephc47 @anjemchoudary I am only suggesting that that military charity change its name to something else.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@stephc47 @anjemchoudary @STWuk @Corbyn4Leader Do you deny that Western foreign policy causes Muslim terrorism?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@stephc47 Are you saying that the Iraqis and Afghans welcomed NATO invasion?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@stephc47 @anjemchoudary "Help 4 Islamophobic Victims of UK Foreign Policy Who Joined the Armed Forces To Kill Muslims in Iraq/Afghanistan"?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@stephc47 @anjemchoudary "H4IVOUKFPWJTAFTKMIIAA"? https://t.co/RRMAyNo1Sr

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@stephc47 @anjemchoudary "Help For Those Who Do and Die But Never Question Why"? "H4TWDADBNQW"?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@stephc47 @anjemchoudary How about Help For Injured Soldiers? "H4IS"?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@secular_hero You are the one who keeps insisting soldiers who kill Muslims while invading their countries are heroes.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@secular_hero You still don't get it that the word "soldiers" is not synonymous with "heroes"? Are you able to look up a dictionary?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@bonkersjeremy @anjemchoudary Help for Heroes is a charity that says UK soldiers who kill Muslims while invading their countries are heroes.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@bonkersjeremy @anjemchoudary Even a primary school pupil knows that the word soldiers does not mean heroes, so what are you playing at?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@secular_hero I am glad you have finally accepted that the word soldiers is not synonymous with heroes.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@secular_hero I wonder if @anjemchoudary would like to draw the attention of @ChtyCommission to the offensive nature of Help for Heroes.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

Someone at @ChtyCommission wasn't doing his/her job when they let Help for Heroes slip thru the net. https://t.co/FzYxhuehmz @anjemchoudary

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

https://www.gov.uk/how-to-choose-a-charity-name

avoid using words or acronyms that could cause offence in English or another language – the commission won’t register charities with names that could be offensive

@DNA_Cowboy @secular_hero @anjemchoudary To be a hero is a conscious intentional act. To end up a war casualty is not by definition heroic.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@ntfem @secular_hero @anjemchoudary why r you connecting military heroes with 'war casualties'? I expect you must mean terrorist casualties?

— DNA Cowboy (@DNA_Cowboy) June 23, 2015

@DNA_Cowboy @secular_hero @anjemchoudary What is your definition of a military hero?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 23, 2015

@ntfem @secular_hero @anjemchoudary http://t.co/NF3kXflX88

— DNA Cowboy (@DNA_Cowboy) June 23, 2015

@DNA_Cowboy @secular_hero @anjemchoudary Was Andy Peat the recipient of charity from @HelpforHeroes?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 23, 2015

@ntfem @secular_hero @anjemchoudary @HelpforHeroes no idea, however, I am sure he supports the charity, regardsie: end of conv -work to do.

— DNA Cowboy (@DNA_Cowboy) June 23, 2015

@DNA_Cowboy @secular_hero @anjemchoudary Are all the recipients of charity from @HelpforHeroes military heroes as you define them?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 23, 2015

78% of warmongering female MPs were Blair's Babes from Labour's all-women shortlists

Full breakdown of how MPs voted on the rebel amendment saying there was no moral case for war against Iraq.

Female Labour MPs who thought there was a moral case for war

1. Ms Irene Adams (Paisley North)
2. Ms Janet Anderson (Rossendale & Darwen)
3. Ms Hilary Armstrong (Durham North West)
4. Ms Candy Atherton (Falmouth & Camborne)
5. Ms Charlotte Atkins (Staffordshire Moorlands)
6. Mrs Margaret Beckett (Derby South)
7. Ms Liz Blackman (Erewash)
8. Ms Hazel Blears (Salford)
9. Dr Lynda Clark (Edinburgh Pentlands)
10. Ms Ann Clwyd (Cynon Valley)
11. Ms Ann Coffey (Stockport)
12. Ms Yvette Cooper (Pontefract & Castleford)
13. Ms Jean Corston (Bristol East)
14. Ms Claire Curtis-Thomas (Crosby)
15. Ms Janet Dean (Burton)
16. Ms Julia Drown (Swindon South)
17. Mrs Gwyneth Dunwoody (Crewe & Nantwich)
18. Ms Angela Eagle (Wallasey)
19. Ms Maria Eagle (Liverpool Garston)
20. Ms Louise Ellman (Liverpool Riverside)
21. Ms Lorna Fitzsimons (Rochdale)
22. Ms Caroline Flint (Don Valley)
23. Ms Barbara Follett (Stevenage)
24. Mrs Linda Gilroy (Plymouth Sutton)
25. Ms Jane Griffiths (Reading East)
26. Ms Harriet Harman (Camberwell & Peckham)
27. Ms Patricia Hewitt (Leicester West)
28. Mrs Margaret Hodge (Barking)
29. Ms Beverley Hughes (Stretford & Urmston)
30. Ms Melanie Johnson (Welwyn Hatfield)
31. Ms Helen Jones (Warrington North)
32. Ms Tessa Jowell (Dulwich & West Norwood)
33. Ms Sally Keeble (Northampton North)
34. Ms Ann Keen (Brentford & Isleworth)
35. Ms Ruth Kelly (Bolton West)
36. Ms Jane Kennedy (Liverpool Wavertree)
37. Ms Oona King (Bethnal Green & Bow)
38. Ms Jackie Lawrence (Preseli Pembrokeshire)
39. Ms Helen Liddell (Airdrie & Shotts)
40. Ms Siobhain McDonagh (Mitcham & Morden)
41. Ms Fiona Mactaggart (Slough)
42. Ms Anne McGuire (Stirling)
43. Ms Shona McIsaac (Cleethorpes)
44. Ms Rosemary McKenna (Cumbernauld & Kilsyth)
45. Ms Gillian Merron (Lincoln)
46. Ms Laura Moffatt (Crawley)
47. Ms Margaret Moran (Luton South)
48. Ms Estelle Morris (Birmingham Yardley)
49. Ms Kali Mountford (Colne Valley)
50. Ms Meg Munn (Sheffield Heeley)
51. Mrs Anne Picking (East Lothian)
52. Ms Bridget Prentice (Lewisham East)
53. Ms Dawn Primarolo (Bristol South)
54. Ms Barbara Roche (Hornsey & Wood Green)
55. Ms Christine Russell (Chester, City of)
56. Ms Clare Short (Birmingham Ladywood)
57. Ms Angela Smith (Basildon)
58. Ms Geraldine Smith (Morecambe & Lunesdale)
59. Ms Jacqui Smith (Redditch)
60. Ms Helen Southworth (Warrington South)
61. Ms Rachel Squire (Dunfermline West)
62. Dr Phyllis Starkey (Milton Keynes South West)
63. Ms Gisela Stuart (Birmingham Edgbaston)
64. Mrs Ann Taylor (Dewsbury)
65. Ms Dari Taylor (Stockton South)

65 of the 83 or 78% of these warmongering cunts were Blair's Babes from Labour's all-women shortlists. 

Blair Babes or Blair's Babes are the 101 female Members of Parliament from the Labour Party elected to the British House of Commons in Labour's landslide general election victory in 1997. The 1997 general election saw more women elected to the House of Commons than ever - 120, exactly double the 60 elected at the 1992 general election. 101 of these women MPs were Labour Party politicians.

Fuck these stupid warmongering cunts.

Female Tory MPs who thought there was a moral case for war

1. Mrs Angela Watkinson (Upminster)
2. Ms Claire Ward (Watford)
3. Ms Rosie Winterton (Doncaster Central)
4. Mrs Virginia Bottomley (Surrey South West)
5. Mrs Angela Browning (Tiverton & Honiton)
6. Mrs Cheryl Gillan (Chesham & Amersham)
7. Miss Julie Kirkbride (Bromsgrove)
8. Mrs Eleanor Laing (Epping Forest)
9. Mrs Jacqui Lait (Beckenham)
10. Mrs Theresa May (Maidenhead)
11. Miss Anne McIntosh (Vale of York)
12. Mrs Marion Roe (Broxbourne)
13. Mrs Gillian Shephard (Norfolk South West)
14. Mrs Caroline Spelman (Meriden)
15. Miss Ann Widdecombe (Maidstone & The Weald)
16. Mrs Ann Winterton (Congleton)

The above are warmongering cunts but these are Tory warmongering cunts, and only 29% of these warmongering cunts were Tory, who didn't have all-women shortlists.

There was not a single female Tory MP who rebelled against the invasion of Iraq.  

Female MPs are not even any good at preventing war and it appears that most females are sheeple and congenitally stupid or even more congenitally stupid than most male MPs.

How many people knew invading Iraq was wrong?

In London alone 1 million people knew it was wrong but most these fuckers in Parliament didn't, it seems. Or, they knew it was wrong and still voted for it anyway. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_15,_2003_anti-war_protest#United_Kingdom

The British Stop the War Coalition (StWC) held a protest in London which it claimed was the largest political demonstration in the city's history. Police estimated attendance as well in excess of 750,000 people and the BBC estimated that around a million attended.  At the finish rally in Hyde Park, the organiser's announced 3 million attended. It remains probably the largest protest march in UK history. The protest was organised under the slogan "No war on Iraq - freedom for Palestine".

Time to tell feminism and Parliamentary democracy to fuck off, don't you think?

1. Lady Sylvia Hermon (UUP Down North)
2. Mrs Iris Robinson (DUP Strangford)

Will a higher percentage of female MPs vote for the Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill than male MPs?

Whether we like it or not, Liberalism and Christianity is kaput and Islam will replace it as surely as night follows day

@ntfem Islam's central statement of faith got mega-publicity in recent Sydney hostage event b/c of blanket media coverage.
— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) December 15, 2014

@AnthonyLarme A criminally violent Iranian refugee should not be considered a representative of Islam, in my opinion. http://t.co/dz7AMwVnw1
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme Liberals are known for their support of liberal intervention ie invasions of usually Muslim countries to impose regime change.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme Number of deaths caused in the West by Muslim terrorism is very small compared to Muslim deaths caused by Western intervention
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme What is the equivalence to Western lives to Muslim lives: 1 Western life is worth 1000+ Muslim lives?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme The quality of a religion should be judged according to its scripture, not in the defective way its adherents follow it.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme If Australia has a problem with refugees who are criminally violent, it should take fewer of them, or none of them at all.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme Accepting refugees is something liberal matriarchies who pride themselves on their compassion are very keen on.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme There is probably liberal guilt involved in taking in refugees because these liberals know they have destroyed their countries
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme The trouble with what passes for ideology in liberal matriarchies is that it is mostly self-destructive and irrational.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme A @UKIP man, @telbo5000 said to me yesterday compassion was more important than logic in formulating government policy.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme This @UKIP man actually thought that compassion should override logic. https://t.co/LUBtaO4djT @telbo5000
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme When you hear young men - @telbo5000 is 31 - squeal about compassion like women - you know they have been feminised.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme The nasty thing about @telbo5000 is that when he lost the argument he threatened violence against me. http://t.co/FzY5CIsY8t
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme Therefore in @telbo5000 you have feminised thinking coupled with the male tendency for being violent: the worst combination.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme The feminised thinking of @telbo5000 was probably dictated by the sexual imperative of having sex with women like @Strangehen
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme As we already know, women are more libtard than men and men who want sex with libtard women must agree with their views.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme Women wear the badge of compassion the way they would bear the badges of femininity and desirability to men.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme Men want women to be compassionate cos they don't want women they love 2b cruel so they see compassion in women as desirable.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme Bachelors must flatter sluts to get sex. Husbands however fear no fault divorce: MEN STITCHED UP NO MATTER WHAT THEY DO.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme Beta males these days do not even get the alpha male of their choice to represent their interests because women have the vote.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme “Women usually vote for the more handsome man.” http://t.co/iqNgNJsWBg
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme A @Telegraph @iancowie agrees with me about narrowing the franchise to taxpayers only. Don't think this will be @UKIP policy.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme You have to acknowledge that all parties in the West even the anti-establishment ones unquestioningly chase the female vote.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme You have to acknowledge not one party in the West even agrees with me about narrowing the franchise. http://t.co/bYwOq67Lw1
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme As I see it, representative democracy cannot in fact reform itself and it will now be a race to the bottom.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme I was expelled from the @bnp for alienating their single mother with illegitimate disabled offspring vote.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme You would have thought that an ethno-nationalist political party would care about the quality of the next generation but no.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme Even the organisations who are supposed to be pursuing aims for a particular cause subordinate that cause to the female vote.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme I actually point this out to nationalists who have in effect retired, but they refuse to agree or pretend not to get it.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme Even the ones who are well-disposed towards me cannot grasp the enormity of how they are in thrall to the female vote.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme By directly disenfranchising the non-taxpaying we disenfranchise most parasitical single mothers and their offspring.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme Islam denies the need for the separation between Church and State because it dispenses with the need for a corruptible clergy.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme Islam asserts that our laws should be consistent with our state ideology/religion and that should be consistent with morality.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme The purpose of morality is to obtain social cohesion for the protection of the group against its internal and external enemies
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme Our external enemies are predictably foreigners who may come to invade, exploit and enslave us.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme The internal enemies of any society are always sluts and socialists and their bastard spawn.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme If bastards turn out OK they will say "My mother was a slut but look at me I turned out OK so it is OK for women to be sluts."
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme There is nothing effective at all in Catholicism that would discourage women from being sluts in the 21st century.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme How could Catholics fight their matriarchal governments anyway? It has no army and no one really prepared to fight for it.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme If the Catholic Church became powerful enough it would probably start conducting another Inquisition, so no thanks.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme Islam has never conducted anything resembling an Inquisition: wars of conquest were enough to satisfy it.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme The first hurdle of anyone wanting to become Christian/Catholic would be the requirement to believe Jesus is God.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme The requirement to believe Jesus is God would be considered an absurdity by anyone educated living in the 21st century.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme Islam denies the Trinity and only requires its adherents to believe that God's message to man is contained in the Koran.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme Even the most rabid Islamophobes I know can't find much wrong with the Koran and have to fall back on their hatred of Muslims.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme If Muslims suffer for being Muslims it is because their governments do not follow the Koran properly and they don't either.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme With its advanced legal system Secular Koranism presents an opportunity for the West to seize the initiative once again.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

Secular Koranism explained

@AnthonyLarme My greatest hurdle is getting a lawyer to read the Koran and seeing its potential for the moral regeneration of the West.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme Muslims lawyers and converts hate Secular Koranism and don't want to give it the oxygen of publicity. http://t.co/4tjwWolsRy
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

@AnthonyLarme The final line of defence of Islamophobes remains to refuse to read the Koran while proclaiming their hatred of Muslims.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

"You may wonder that the dollar's strength (lack of collapse) in the face of money printing and ever expanding debt accumulation is as a consequence of underlying US economic strength or huge amounts of (Invisible) gold reserves at Fort Knox. The real reason why the US is able to get sway with printing unlimited amounts of money is the US Military, as the US remains the worlds sole hyper military power following the collapse of the soviet union and increasingly relies on global military power to back up the dollar as the worlds primary means of exchange, as any country that chooses not to comply will likely be on the receiving end of a 1000 tomahawk cruise missiles as Libya is experiencing today or even worse as Iraq has experienced during the past 8 years."

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article48642.html

http://empirestrikesblack.com/2011/06/flashback-petrodollar-warfare-saddam-abandons-dollar-for-euro/

Can a nation that operates foreign and domestic policies that are obviously evil, destructive and self-destructive prosper or even survive?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 16, 2014

Emasculated male MPs only very slightly more likely to defy three-line whip than female MPs

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2770534/Parliament-debates-British-military-action-Iraq.html

MALE MPs FOR AIRSTRIKES

1. Adams, Nigel
2. Afriyie, Adam
3. Ainsworth, rh Mr Bob
4. Aldous, Peter
5. Alexander, rh Danny
6. Alexander, rh Mr Douglas
7. Amess, Mr David
8. Anderson, Mr David
9. Andrew, Stuart
10. Arbuthnot, rh Mr James
11. Ashworth, Jonathan
12. Austin, Ian
13. Bailey, Mr Adrian
14. Bain, Mr William
15. Baldry, rh Sir Tony
16. Balls, rh Ed
17. Banks, Gordon
18. Barclay, Stephen
19. Barker, rh Gregory
20. Barron, rh Kevin
21. Bayley, Hugh
22. Bebb, Guto
23. Beith, rh Sir Alan
24. Bellingham, Mr Henry
25. Benn, rh Hilary
26. Benyon, Richard
27. Beresford, Sir Paul
28. Berry, Jake
29. Betts, Mr Clive
30. Bingham, Andrew
31. Binley, Mr Brian
32. Blackman, Bob
33. Blenkinsop, Tom
34. Blomfield, Paul
35. Blunkett, rh Mr David
36. Boles, Nick
37. Bone, Mr Peter
38. Brady, Mr Graham
39. Brake, rh Tom
40. Brazier, Mr Julian
41. Brennan, Kevin
42. Bridgen, Andrew
43. Brine, Steve
44. Brokenshire, James
45. Brown, rh Mr Nicholas
46. Brown, Mr Russell
47. Browne, Mr Jeremy
48. Bruce, rh Sir Malcolm
49. Buckland, Mr Robert
50. Burden, Richard
51. Burley, Mr Aidan
52. Burnham, rh Andy
53. Burns, Conor
54. Burrowes, Mr David
55. Burstow, rh Paul
56. Burt, rh Alistair
57. Byles, Dan
58. Byrne, rh Mr Liam
59. Cable, rh Vince
60. Cairns, Alun
61. Cameron, rh Mr David
62. Campbell, rh Mr Alan
63. Campbell, Mr Gregory
64. Campbell, rh Sir Menzies
65. Carmichael, rh Mr Alistair
66. Carmichael, Neil
67. Cash, Sir William
68. Chishti, Rehman
69. Chope, Mr Christopher
70. Clappison, Mr James
71. Clark, rh Greg
72. Clarke, rh Mr Kenneth
73. Clarke, rh Mr Tom
74. Clegg, rh Mr Nick
75. Clifton-Brown, Geoffrey
76. Coaker, Vernon
77. Collins, Damian
78. Colvile, Oliver
79. Cox, Mr Geoffrey
80. Crabb, rh Stephen
81. Crausby, Mr David
82. Crockart, Mike
83. Cruddas, Jon
84. Cryer, John
85. Cunningham, Alex
86. Cunningham, Mr Jim
87. Cunningham, Sir Tony
88. Danczuk, Simon
89. Darling, rh Mr Alistair
90. Davey, rh Mr Edward
91. David, Wayne
92. Davies, David T. C.
93. Davies, Geraint
94. Davies, Glyn
95. de Bois, Nick
96. Denham, rh Mr John
97. Djanogly, Mr Jonathan
98. Dobson, rh Frank
99. Docherty, Thomas
100. Dodds, rh Mr Nigel
101. Donaldson, rh Mr Jeffrey M.
102. Doughty, Stephen
103. Dowd, Jim
104. Drax, Richard
105. Dromey, Jack
106. Duddridge, James
107. Dugher, Michael
108. Duncan, rh Sir Alan
109. Duncan Smith, rh Mr Iain
110. Dunne, Mr Philip
111. Efford, Clive
112. Ellis, Michael
113. Ellwood, Mr Tobias
114. Elphicke, Charlie
115. Esterson, Bill
116. Eustice, George
117. Evans, Chris
118. Evans, Graham
119. Evans, Jonathan
120. Evans, Mr Nigel
121. Evennett, Mr David
122. Fallon, rh Michael
123. Farrelly, Paul
124. Farron, Tim
125. Field, rh Mr Frank
126. Field, Mark
127. Flello, Robert
128. Foster, rh Mr Don
129. Fox, rh Dr Liam
130. Francis, Dr Hywel
131. Francois, rh Mr Mark
132. Freeman, George
133. Freer, Mike
134. Fuller, Richard
135. Gapes, Mike
136. Gardiner, Barry
137. Garnier, Sir Edward
138. Garnier, Mark
139. Gauke, Mr David
140. George, Andrew
141. Gibb, Mr Nick
142. Gilbert, Stephen
143. Glen, John
144. Goldsmith, Zac
145. Goodwill, Mr Robert
146. Gove, rh Michael
147. Graham, Richard
148. Gray, Mr James
149. Grayling, rh Chris
150. Greatrex, Tom
151. Green, rh Damian
152. Grieve, rh Mr Dominic
153. Griffiths, Andrew
154. Gummer, Ben
155. Gwynne, Andrew
156. Gyimah, Mr Sam
157. Hague, rh Mr William
158. Hain, rh Mr Peter
159. Halfon, Robert
160. Hames, Duncan
161. Hamilton, Fabian
162. Hammond, rh Mr Philip
163. Hammond, Stephen
164. Hancock, rh Matthew
165. Hancock, Mr Mike
166. Hands, rh Greg
167. Harper, Mr Mark
168. Harrington, Richard
169. Harris, Mr Tom
170. Harvey, Sir Nick
171. Haselhurst, rh Sir Alan
172. Havard, Mr Dai
173. Hayes, rh Mr John
174. Heald, Sir Oliver
175. Healey, rh John
176. Heaton-Harris, Chris
177. Hemming, John
178. Hendrick, Mark
179. Hendry, Charles
180. Herbert, rh Nick
181. Heyes, David
182. Hinds, Damian
183. Hoban, Mr Mark
184. Hollingbery, George
185. Hollobone, Mr Philip
186. Hood, Mr Jim
187. Hopkins, Kris
188. Horwood, Martin
189. Howarth, rh Mr George
190. Howarth, Sir Gerald
191. Howell, John
192. Hughes, rh Simon
193. Hunt, rh Mr Jeremy
194. Hunt, Tristram
195. Hurd, Mr Nick
196. Irranca-Davies, Huw
197. Jackson, Mr Stewart
198. Jarvis, Dan
199. Javid, rh Sajid
200. Jenkin, Mr Bernard
201. Jenrick, Robert
202. Johnson, Gareth
203. Johnson, Joseph
204. Jones, Andrew
205. Jones, rh Mr David
206. Jones, Graham
207. Jones, Mr Kevan
208. Jones, Mr Marcus
209. Joyce, Eric
210. Kane, Mike
211. Kawczynski, Daniel
212. Kelly, Chris
213. Khan, rh Sadiq
214. Kirby, Simon
215. Knight, rh Sir Greg
216. Kwarteng, Kwasi
217. Lamb, rh Norman
218. Lammy, rh Mr David
219. Lancaster, Mark
220. Lansley, rh Mr Andrew
221. Laws, rh Mr David
222. Lee, Dr Phillip
223. Lefroy, Jeremy
224. Leigh, Sir Edward
225. Leslie, Chris
226. Letwin, rh Mr Oliver
227. Lewis, Brandon
228. Lewis, Mr Ivan
229. Lewis, Dr Julian
230. Lidington, rh Mr David
231. Lilley, rh Mr Peter
232. Lloyd, Stephen
233. Lopresti, Jack
234. Lord, Jonathan
235. Loughton, Tim
236. Love, Mr Andrew
237. Lucas, Ian
238. Luff, Sir Peter
239. Mahmood, Mr Khalid
240. Mann, John
241. Marsden, Mr Gordon
242. Maude, rh Mr Francis
243. Maynard, Paul
244. McCabe, Steve
245. McCann, Mr Michael
246. McCartney, Jason
247. McCartney, Karl
248. McCrea, Dr William
249. McDonald, Andy
250. McFadden, rh Mr Pat
251. McGovern, Jim
252. McLoughlin, rh Mr Patrick
253. Meacher, rh Mr Michael
254. Meale, Sir Alan
255. Mearns, Ian
256. Menzies, Mark
257. Metcalfe, Stephen
258. Miliband, rh Edward
259. Miller, Andrew
260. Mitchell, rh Mr Andrew
261. Moore, rh Michael
262. Morris, David
263. Morris, James
264. Mosley, Stephen
265. Mowat, David
266. Mulholland, Greg
267. Mundell, rh David
268. Murphy, rh Mr Jim
269. Murphy, rh Paul
270. Murrison, Dr Andrew
271. Neill, Robert
272. Newmark, Mr Brooks
273. Nuttall, Mr David
274. O'Brien, rh Mr Stephen
275. Offord, Dr Matthew
276. Ollerenshaw, Eric
277. Opperman, Guy
278. Osborne, rh Mr George
279. Ottaway, rh Sir Richard
280. Owen, Albert
281. Paice, rh Sir James
282. Paisley, Ian
283. Parish, Neil
284. Paterson, rh Mr Owen
285. Pawsey, Mark
286. Penning, rh Mike
287. Penrose, John
288. Percy, Andrew
289. Perkins, Toby
290. Phillips, Stephen
291. Pickles, rh Mr Eric
292. Pincher, Christopher
293. Poulter, Dr Daniel
294. Pound, Stephen
295. Pritchard, Mark
296. Pugh, John
297. Raab, Mr Dominic
298. Randall, rh Sir John
299. Raynsford, rh Mr Nick
300. Reed, Mr Jamie
301. Reed, Mr Steve
302. Rees-Mogg, Jacob
303. Reevell, Simon
304. Reid, Mr Alan
305. Reynolds, Jonathan
306. Robathan, rh Mr Andrew
307. Robertson, rh Sir Hugh
308. Robertson, John
309. Robertson, Mr Laurence
310. Robinson, Mr Geoffrey
311. Rogerson, Dan
312. Rosindell, Andrew
313. Roy, Lindsay
314. Ruane, Chris
315. Russell, Sir Bob
316. Rutley, David
317. Sanders, Mr Adrian
318. Sarwar, Anas
319. Sawford, Andy
320. Selous, Andrew
321. Shannon, Jim
322. Shapps, rh Grant
323. Sharma, Alok
324. Sharma, Mr Virendra
325. Shepherd, Sir Richard
326. Sheridan, Jim
327. Shuker, Gavin
328. Simmonds, Mark
329. Simpson, David
330. Simpson, Mr Keith
331. Skidmore, Chris
332. Slaughter, Mr Andy
333. Smith, Henry
334. Smith, Julian
335. Smith, Nick
336. Smith, Owen
337. Smith, Sir Robert
338. Soames, rh Sir Nicholas
339. Spellar, rh Mr John
340. Spencer, Mr Mark
341. Stanley, rh Sir John
342. Stephenson, Andrew
343. Stevenson, John
344. Stewart, Bob
345. Stewart, Iain
346. Stewart, Rory
347. Streeter, Mr Gary
348. Stride, Mel
349. Stuart, Mr Graham
350. Stunell, rh Sir Andrew
351. Sturdy, Julian
352. Sutcliffe, Mr Gerry
353. Swales, Ian
354. Swayne, rh Mr Desmond
355. Swire, rh Mr Hugo
356. Syms, Mr Robert
357. Tami, Mark
358. Thomas, Mr Gareth
359. Thornton, Mike
360. Timms, rh Stephen
361. Timpson, Mr Edward
362. Tomlinson, Justin
363. Tredinnick, David
364. Trickett, Jon
365. Turner, Mr Andrew
366. Turner, Karl
367. Twigg, Derek
368. Twigg, Stephen
369. Tyrie, Mr Andrew
370. Umunna, Mr Chuka
371. Uppal, Paul
372. Vaizey, Mr Edward
373. Vara, Mr Shailesh
374. Vaz, rh Keith
375. Vickers, Martin
376. Walker, Mr Charles
377. Walker, Mr Robin
378. Wallace, Mr Ben
379. Walter, Mr Robert
380. Ward, Mr David
381. Watts, Mr Dave
382. Weatherley, Mike
383. Webb, rh Steve
384. Wharton, James
385. White, Chris
386. Whitehead, Dr Alan
387. Whittaker, Craig
388. Whittingdale, Mr John
389. Wiggin, Bill
390. Willetts, rh Mr David
391. Williams, Mr Mark
392. Williams, Roger
393. Williams, Stephen
394. Williamson, Chris
395. Williamson, Gavin
396. Wilson, Phil
397. Wilson, Mr Rob
398. Wilson, Sammy
399. Woodcock, John
400. Woodward, rh Mr Shaun
401. Wright, David
402. Wright, Mr Iain
403. Wright, rh Jeremy
404. Wright, Simon
405. Yeo, Mr Tim
406. Young, rh Sir George
407. Zahawi, Nadhim
408. Mark Hunter
409. Gavin Barwell

MALE MPs AGAINST AIRSTRIKES

1. Allen, Mr Graham
2. Bacon, Mr Richard
3. Baron, Mr John
4. Campbell, Mr Ronnie
5. Caton, Martin
6. Davidson, Mr Ian
7. Durkan, Mark
8. Edwards, Jonathan
9. Flynn, Paul
10. Galloway, George
11. Henderson, Gordon
12. Hepburn, Mr Stephen
13. Holloway, Mr Adam
14. Hopkins, Kelvin
15. Hosie, Stewart
16. Huppert, Dr Julian
17. Lazarowicz, Mark
18. MacNeil, Mr Angus Brendan
19. McDonnell, Dr Alasdair
20. McDonnell, John
21. McKenzie, Mr Iain
22. Mills, Nigel
23. Mitchell, Austin
24. Morris, Grahame M.
25. Mudie, Mr George
26. Reckless, Mark
27. Robertson, Angus
28. Sheerman, Mr Barry
29. Skinner, Mr Dennis
30. Stringer, Graham
31. Weir, Mr Mike
32. Williams, Hywel
33. Wood, Mike
34. Jeremy Corbyn
35. Pete Wishart

8% of male MPs defied three-line whip to make an empty gesture that would only make things worse.

FEMALE MPs FOR AIRSTRIKES

1. Abrahams, Debbie
2. Alexander, Heidi
3. Baldwin, Harriett
4. Beckett, rh Margaret
5. Berger, Luciana
6. Blackman-Woods, Roberta
7. Blackwood, Nicola
8. Blears, rh Hazel
9. Bradley, Karen
10. Bray, Angie
11. Brooke, rh Annette
12. Brown, Lyn
13. Bruce, Fiona
14. Buck, Ms Karen
15. Burt, Lorely
16. Champion, Sarah
17. Clwyd, rh Ann
18. Coffey, Ann
19. Coffey, Dr Thérèse
20. Cooper, rh Yvette
21. Creagh, Mary
22. Creasy, Stella
23. Crouch, Tracey
24. De Piero, Gloria
25. Dinenage, Caroline
26. Dorries, Nadine
27. Doyle, Gemma
28. Doyle-Price, Jackie
29. Eagle, Ms Angela
30. Eagle, Maria
31. Elliott, Julie
32. Ellison, Jane
33. Engel, Natascha
34. Featherstone, rh Lynne
35. Flint, rh Caroline
36. Fovargue, Yvonne
37. Fullbrook, Lorraine
38. Gillan, rh Mrs Cheryl
39. Glass, Pat
40. Glindon, Mrs Mary
41. Goodman, Helen
42. Grant, Mrs Helen
43. Green, Kate
44. Greening, rh Justine
45. Greenwood, Lilian
46. Griffith, Nia
47. Harman, rh Ms Harriet
48. Harris, Rebecca
49. Hillier, Meg
50. Hilling, Julie
51. Hillier, Meg
52. Hodge, rh Margaret
53. Hodgson, Mrs Sharon
54. Jackson, Glenda
55. James, Margot
56. Jamieson, Cathy
57. Jones, Susan Elan
58. Jowell, rh Dame Tessa
59. Kendall, Liz
60. Latham, Pauline
61. Leadsom, Andrea
62. Lee, Jessica
63. Leslie, Charlotte
64. Lewell-Buck, Mrs Emma
65. Long, Naomi
66. Lumley, Karen
67. Macleod, Mary
68. Mahmood, Shabana
69. Main, Mrs Anne
70. Malhotra, Seema
71. May, rh Mrs Theresa
72. McCarthy, Kerry
73. McDonagh, Siobhain
74. McGovern, Alison
75. McIntosh, Miss Anne
76. McKinnell, Catherine
77. McVey, rh Esther
78. Miller, rh Maria
79. Milton, Anne
80. Moon, Mrs Madeleine
81. Mordaunt, Penny
82. Morden, Jessica
83. Morgan, rh Nicky
84. Morris, Anne Marie
85. Munn, Meg
86. Munt, Tessa
87. Murray, Sheryll
88. Nandy, Lisa
89. Nash, Pamela
90. Newton, Sarah
91. Nokes, Caroline
92. Onwurah, Chi
93. Osborne, Sandra
94. Patel, Priti
95. Perry, Claire
96. Phillipson, Bridget
97. Powell, Lucy
98. Reeves, Rachel
99. Reynolds, Emma
100. Rudd, Amber
101. Seabeck, Alison
102. Smith, Angela
103. Smith, Chloe
104. Soubry, Anna
105. Spelman, rh Mrs Caroline
106. Stuart, Ms Gisela
107. Swinson, Jo
108. Thornberry, Emily
109. Truss, rh Elizabeth
110. Vaz, Valerie
111. Villiers, rh Mrs Theresa
112. Walley, Joan
113. Watkinson, Dame Angela
114. Wheeler, Heather
115. Willott, Jenny
116. Winterton, rh Ms Rosie
117. Wollaston, Dr Sarah

FEMALE MPs AGAINST AIRSTRIKES

1. Abbott, Ms Diane
2. Begg, Dame Anne
3. Clark, Katy
4. Hoey, Kate
5. James, Mrs Siân C.
6. Lucas, Caroline
7. Riordan, Mrs Linda
8. Ritchie, Ms Margaret
9. Whiteford, Dr Eilidh

Only 7% of female MPs defied three-line whip to make an empty gesture that would only make things worse.

The West’s sad semi-war against ISIS is worse than useless

INTERVENTION IS MAKING THINGS WORSE – AGAIN

ISIS: a monster made by the moralists of the West

How Ken can mop up a few more votes and give Boris a haircut on May 3

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/apr/25/ken-livingstone-elect-chat-show-host?CMP=twt_gu

We could have a recorded debate on immigration, Islam, the war, the economy, law and order, the Americanisation AKA dumbing down of British politics, how he sees the future etc.  Or he could just allow me to interview him and blog about it.

If he wants me only at arm's length we can do this by Twitter or Facebook.

Over to you, Ken, to mop up votes from "Far Right" Londoners if you position yourself with just the right choice of words.

The only thing Ken has done that the BNP would approve of is his anti-war stance, which is in agreement with their own.

Boris hasn't even got that because that twerp voted for the war.  

Now is the time to see if all London voters care about is their own pleasures and their own comfort and that they don't give a damn about messing up other people's countries and ruining their lives.  

For all London voters who hate the war and what is being done in their name voting for Ken ought to be a no-brainer.

Now is the time to see if Londoners are mere sheeple dazzled by the public school charm of their Etonian mayor (with Prime Ministerial ambitions) who always makes a point of shying away from discussing controversial subjects and who VOTED FOR THE WAR, unlike Our Wise, Courageous and Independent-minded Ken.

If Britain had been an Islamic state operating a system of direct democracy before WW2 Britain would not have lost its empire

Direct democracy is the only form of democracy worth discussing. That was the purest form of democracy as practised by the Ancient Greeks, and it is this version that the Koran recommends.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shura#cite_note-1

The Ancient Greeks voted on what laws to pass and what laws to repeal and whether to go to war.

Governments who consult the governed fare better than the rest because they can at least have a proper debate, take responsibility for whatever was decided and move on, while we cannot, because we feel abused, marginalised, ignored and betrayed.

Imagine, if the British had been asked about WW2, would Britain have lost its empire that was acquired with so much blood, sweat and tears by their ancestors?

But Churchill threw it all away because he wanted to be a war leader.

It was he who frittered away the inheritance of the British people.

When people like John Tyndall (who founded the BNP) complained with words to the effect after the war that Britain lost her empire for ignoble reasons and only gained the ignoble rewards of liberal decadence ie feminism, sexual licence, the emasculation and the disgusting feminisation of the white man and the uncontrolled immigration that would change the character of this nation forever, he was branded a Nazi and discredited by the liberal media.

After WW2 and after the loss of its empire, Britain could only comfort itself with the welfare state and the soft sweet luxuries of sexual liberation and easy divorce. But what did the welfare state that supported feminism and sexual licence do to the British ultimately?

The welfare state led to family breakdown, single parenthood, widespread illegitimacy, fatherlessness, ever lowering standards of education and morality, the worship of Mammon in the form of our sex and shopping society.

In short, the welfare state fueled by rampant consumerism created a culture of irresponsible borrowing and lending by government and individuals, the boom-bust cycle, all of which eventually led to the credit crunch affecting the entire Western world, who are now economically, morally bankrupt and heartily despised.

Perhaps it was ordained for the British to suffer the presence of Muslims, and to watch the people they regarded as a brown inferior race with a primitive religion surpass them in numbers, wealth and achievement in such a short space of time.

In the recent riots of England, whites joined in with the blacks to loot the shops of the browns, who are mostly the people these days who do any real business and who have property to protect.

It just shows you the strength and superiority of those who practise family values supported by marriage, compared to those once racially superior white affluent liberal atheists who thought they were above that sort of thing, but who are now effeminate reptiles and dogs, without honour and without shame, degraded and utterly contemptible in their cowardice and hypocrisy both in their domestic and foreign policy.

Imagine the kind of people who think the rest of the world is stupid enough to believe that they are invading another country for the good that country!   Their own people may be stupid enough to believe that, but it is sheer ignorance and arrogance to think others not subject to the British education system would be quite so susceptible to this sort of liberal claptrap.

Staggering, they will soon fall down on the pavement dead drunk, but not after vomiting and involuntarily defecating in the manner of drunks who really have had too much to drink, after all the partying they have had.  The rest of the world waits patiently, ready to kick their head in when this happens.

The lower the morals of women, the lower the morals of men.  And the morals of white working class slut, slag and slapper is very low indeed as they necessarily must be to have so many variously-fathered illegitimate children at the expense of the taxpayer in Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland.

Around half the children born in Britain are now born out of wedlock.

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23427447-more-than-half-of-all-british-babies-are-born-out-of-marriage.do

Think of how low the morals of the male political establishment must be, if they are afraid to criticise these sluts, slags and slappers who have variously-fathered bastards at the expense of the taxpayer.  It is no surprise that they do the things they now do in the world.  One can only hope that China and Russia eventually work up the courage to stop these fools and knaves in their tracks, with one neatly planted sucker punch, for the sake of world peace and to put an end to the toxic ideology of liberalism, which has delighted us for quite long enough.

Stupid bitch dies in stupid war for Bush, Blair, Brown, Cameron and Clegg

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/defence/8462836/Female-bomb-disposal-expert-dies-in-hospital-after-blast.html

Any soldier in Afghanistan who is dying for nothing instead of mutinying against this shit policy of being in Afghanistan are stupid bastards and bitches. But plenty more where they came from, eh?

British troops out of Afghanistan NOW.

Do not honour stupid bitches and stupid fuckers who willingly die for nothing and are happy to die for the dreary ceremony that is Remembrance Sunday.

Wake up stupid bastards and stupid bitches before you get blown up for Bush, Blair, Brown, Cameron and Clegg.

It is YOUR funeral, or soon will be, stupid.

If you have friends and family in the Armed Forces, tell them to mutiny before more damage is done to the reputation of this country IN YOUR NAME by Cunt Cameron and his warmongering fuckers.

It is YOUR country and in YOUR name Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya are being invaded in.

Do you know how much the rest of the world hates us?

Yes, they really really HATE us.

They kill Christians in their country to show how much they hate us and we still don't get it.

Boy, are we STUPID.

Al Qaeda killing Christians in Iraq

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2010/11/2010111081934395118.html

is a strategy of defeating the West that is ruthlessly rational and chillingly effective.

Perhaps they will convert us all by the sword after all.

I hope that my antidote of Secular Koranism will be considered worthy of discussion when things get worse. 

Whether the stabbing of Stephen Timms was a Good Thing

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/8110447/Website-used-by-woman-who-stabbed-MP-encourages-further-attacks.html

I wonder if Stephen Timms would vote to invade Iraq again if he could turn back time. Not very clever of him as his constituents are mostly Muslims. Not the brightest bulb in the box then, but then that is the typical profile of lobby fodder in the LibLabCon. Why are the stupid who don't even know how to look after themselves in charge of the ship of state? Why does the government always insist on stupidity and spinelessness as qualifications to be an MP?

Let me clarify my position very very carefully.

1. I am delighted that lobby fodder Stephen Timms got his come-uppance.

2. If he had died it would have made a better story because it would have put the fear of God into these lobby fodder MPs.

3. Their fear of further attacks on their numbers would bounce them into recanting and expressing remorse and regret to avoid a similar fate.

4. Loss of support for the war amongst more than half of the House would have a significant impact on the conduct of the war.

5. It would mean the withdrawal of British troops *sooner* rather than later, and the reduction in the numbers of lives lost on both sides.  (This would of course be a Good Thing for both Muslims and non-Muslims, Britain and Afghanistan.)

6. Do my views make me complicit in the stabbing of Stephen Timms? No.

7. Was the stabbing of Stephen Timms a Good thing? Yes, because it demonstrates that violent acts (such as voting for a dishonorable and unwinnable war just because your leader said so) begets violence.  There is a philosophical argument that the morality of an act (eg stabbing a politician) can only be judged by the intended consequences of that act (eg the prevention of further lives being lost unnecessarily on both sides in the prosecution of a dishonorable and unwinnable war, sooner rather than later). 

8. Would his death have been a better thing? Of course, because it would result in the war ending sooner rather than later because of the haemorrhaging of support for the war amongst our politicians, if not an actual stampede to denounce it, especially if there were further attacks on other MPs.

9.  Would I be pleased if another MP were attacked?  No, because there is no need for anyone else to be hurt if they are already earnestly discussing the best way of dealing with the situation.   But are they though? 



I hope this is all reasonably clear.  

Proposed survey for MPs who supported the invasion of "Afraq"

The stabbing of Caesar on the Ides of March

In  the light of Stephen Timms' stabbing by an anti-war Muslim constituent, may I suggest that the BBC conduct a survey amongst the MPs who voted for the war?

They must be gravely concerned about their personal safety.  Indeed, some of them may even have  nightmares of being stabbed, Ides of March style, by their Muslim constituents, especially the ones who have constituencies in Muslim majority areas.

Below are 10 questions that could be put to them:

1. Now that you have the benefit of hindsight, would you still vote for the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan if you could turn back time?

2. Was any pressure applied on you in any way at all to vote for the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan?

3. Was this pressure applied by the party whip?

4. Do you think the existence of the party whip has the effect of alienating a politician even further from his conscience and integrity?

5. Are you aware of Peter Bone's House of Commons Disqualification Bill due for a Second Reading on 10 December 2010?

 http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2010-11/houseofcommonsdisqualificationamendment.html

6. Has any pressure (explicit or implicit) been applied on you to not support this bill?

7. Did this pressure (explicit or implicit) come from your party whip or your leader?

8. Will you be giving in to this pressure or resisting it?

9. If you intend to give in to this pressure, ie not support the House of Commons Disqualification Bill, what are your reasons for doing so?

10. Would you like to express remorse for voting for the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan in the hope of reducing the likelihood of being stabbed "Ides of March" style by your Muslim constituents?

Toby Young, his West London Free School and SECRET IRAQ

http://www.guardian.co.uk/tv-and-radio/2010/sep/30/start-your-own-school

Did anyone see START YOUR OWN SCHOOL and SECRET IRAQ?  Toby Young (who defriended me because I called Cameron a cunt of convictionless Conservatism on his walls) is seen to be getting a good kicking by the liberal establishment for his presumption.  This is what you have to do in rip-off Britain if you want to send your 4 children to a good school but there are no grammar schools around and you can't afford to go private. Watch the middle classes being pissed on by the liberal establishment.  It may be dawning on Toby Young that that cunt of convictionless Conservatism Cameron whom he thinks is going to help and his sidekick Michael Gove are just stringing him along like the Brokeback prick-teasers they are.  In the end they will tell you to go fuck yourself, Toby.  

Even if the West London Free School gets established, most parents won't be able to get their arse into gear to do all you did. 

But A+ for effort, Toby!  It will help to the world that Britain is now the land where we are now reduced to starting our own schools in order to give our children a decent education, or see them turn into CHAVs and white trash.

Great show if you want to watch Toby being pissed on by the educational establishment and tied up with red tape.


As for SECRET IRAQ, it took a while for shit for brain British fuckwits to realise that the Iraqis - surprise, surprise, surprise! - hate the Coalition troops who messed up their country, and want to kill them.  Whatever Saddam did to them in the good old  bad old days, all is forgiven and they now miss him and want him back.  If they could press a button, turn back time and have him back, they would do so in a blinking of the eye.  Still, a lot of British politicians (like David Miliband who said in the Labour hustings that he supported the invasion of "Afraq") don't quite get this.  Maybe it is to do with the shit education that they get in British schools.

http://www.westlondonfreeschool.co.uk/blog/start-your-own-school.html

A question for Muslims

Is it better to vote for

1. a party that has the most policies you agree with but says it hates and fears you yet does no more than hurt your feelings

or

2.  a party that says it likes you but harms you and people like you in other countries?
 

Liberal Orthodoxy v The National Interest; How to vote in General Election 2010

If you are going to vote LibLabCon, you are too stupid to vote.

If you vote for policies supported by parties that amount to a systematic cultivation of failure, you are too stupid to vote.

If you think Cameron is going to be better than Brown, after the hash he has made out of policy-making in the last five years since he became leader, you are too stupid to vote.

The Liberal Democrats are a party of porn stars and coprophiliacs, and are so out of touch that they think it is OK to be seen to be a party that tolerates this filth.

If you think the LibDems are a protest vote, you are too stupid to vote.

If you think "racism" is worse than loss of liberty, you are too stupid to vote.

If you are afraid to vote for a party because of its reputation of racism, though it has many policies that you actually support, you are too stupid to vote.

UKIP would appear to be the happy medium, though it has hedged its bets on the war and on the EU. If you think hedging its bets was a good idea then vote UKIP.

UKIP will not explicitly denounce the war and only offers us a referendum on the EU.

The BNP however states it would withdraw British troops now if it could, and intends to withdraw from the EU without holding a referendum.

If you prefer a party that was the most consistently against the invasion of Muslim lands from the beginning, then you know what to do. If there were any justice in the world, they should mop up the Muslim vote since many of their policies, such as government by referenda as well as corporal and capital punishment, are supported by the Koran.

But there is very little justice in the world and very little reason in Man.

The party that was right all along is unfortunately also unpopular and has been consistently demonised by the liberal media for many decades.

It remains to be seen if that party has the ability to attract enough votes to revolutionise the debate between Liberal Orthodoxy and the National Interest.

The longer the war carries on the more paranoid the government will get, the more paranoid it gets the more paranoid it will make us. It will then rob us of even more of our liberties and property.

Liberalism is rotten to the core because it has perverted its own ideals. Its supports are the unholy Quartet of Denial, Denunciation, Ostracisation and Censorship.

Let us hope it will have the decency to die before it does any more damage.

£140 million's worth of advice to the UK government

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/02/prevent-anti-muslim-extre_n_342827.html

"... the 140 million pound ($230 million) Preventing Violent Extremism (Prevent) program is now facing serious criticism, not just from within the Muslim community, but from civil liberties groups."

If they gave me the money I would tell the government exactly how to prevent violent extremism.

1. Withdraw British soldiers from Afghanistan and apologise to the Afghans.
   
2. Withdraw British presence from Iraq and apologise to the Iraqis.
   
3. Dissociate the UK from the US and formally declare an end to the Special Poodle Relationship.
   
4. Declare that the UK is now steadfastly neutral on Israel's right to exist.
5. Declare that the government will promote social cohesion through family values thereby decreasing the likelihood adolescent angst likely to result in explosive acts of violence.
   

There. £140 million, please!

Invading "Afraq" is like ....

Invading "Afraq" is like having a bad day at work and kicking the dog and/or shouting at the missus and/or kids when you get home.

The US and UK did all of the above and are now finding that the dog needs to be taken to the vet, the missus is filing for divorce and the kids have reported you to Social Services for child abuse.

Anger is indeed a deadly sin.

7 Point Plan to Peace

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/jan/21/counter-terrorism-funds-pakistan

The solution to the shortfall in terrorism funds is idiotically simple that even a child could tell you the answer.

1. Stop giving more terrorists more reasons to hate you.

2. Stop making Muslims all over the world hate you.

3. Stop putting British Muslims in an impossible position.

4. Stop associating ourselves with Israel and the US.

5. Stop the killing of white boys by the Taliban.

6. Stop white boys killing Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan.

7. Stop the war.

Jack Straw and the Chilcot Enquiry

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6996895.ece

Jack Straw paraphrased:

"I knew it was wrong but did it anyway."

Two simple reasons why invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan is Illegal

OFFICIAL:

Invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan ILLEGAL. Why? Because Article 5 of NATO Treaty implicitly refers to an "armed attack" by another sovereign state.

Al Qaeda is not another sovereign state.

Iraq was not responsible for 9/11.

Anyone who still supports the invasions are supporters of illegal wars.

As long as we are now clear about this.

In remembrannce of those who died and those who are to die for Blair and Brown

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1225090/Five-British-soldiers-killed-Afghanistan-single-attack-Taliban.html

Remembrance Sunday is coming up. This is my poetic effort in remembrance of those who died and for those still living who don't want to die in stupid wars that have nothing to do with us.

All them dead,
All for what?
Show us, tell us,
All for what?
Blair and Brown,
Liar and clown,
Is it for you our boys die for?
Go to hell,
Don't come back,
Go to Iraq and Afghanistan!
Let them tear you both apart!

David Wilshire compares treatment of MPs to Hitler's treatment of Jews

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/conservative-mps-expenses/6480680/MPs-expenses-David-Wilshire-compares-treatment-of-politicians-to-Jews-in-Nazi-Germany.html

Some may think this is a bit over the top, but MPs are social pariahs, even more despised than all the immigrants legal and illegal, asylum seekers failed and bogus they have let in.

Was there not talk of Resettlement Grants recently in relation to MPs?

Where would they be expelled to, I wondered, for a brief mad moment. Madagascar?

The only way they can redeem themselves now is if they all joined the BNP, demanded a BNP-UKIP merger and campaigned for an EU referendum.

But they won't because they are feeble-minded cowards and weaklings, despicable and hypocritical.

Perhaps concentration camps can be set up for them near the House since they are no longer allowed a second home allowance.

They can join Brian Haw who has established a camp there. Their joining him in protesting against the Iraq war may dispose the public to relent when it comes to sending them to the extermination camps that are now being built to receive them.

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/06/342704.html