Does Help for Heroes fall foul of s 5 of the Public Order Act 1986?

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/64/section/5

5 Harassment, alarm or distress.

(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—
(a)uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or
(b)displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting,within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby.

http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/how-we-help/

HOW WE HELP OUR HEROES

Our mission is to deliver an enduring national network of support for our wounded and their families. We will inspire and enable those who have made sacrifices on our behalf to achieve their full potential.

The war in Afghanistan may be over, but for those who have suffered life-changing injuries, their battles are just beginning.

We've estimated that, of the 220,560 individuals deployed to Afghanistan and Iraq between 2001 and 2014, up to 75,000 servicemen and women (and their families) may need our support in the future. We will not let them fight these battles alone.

@secular_hero @anjemchoudary It is asinine to declare that all soldiers are heroes.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@ant1969salford @anjemchoudary That wristband says all soldiers are heroes.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@jollywoger @anjemchoudary If you wear a badge that says all soldiers are heroes it means you approve of all wars.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@secular_hero @anjemchoudary The name HELP FOR HEROES implies that all soldiers injured invading Muslims countries are heroes, geddit?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@secular_hero @anjemchoudary The name of that military charity has POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS by saying soldiers are heroes.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@secular_hero @anjemchoudary Islamophobes think soldiers who kill Muslims in the process of invading their lands are heroes, don't you?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@secular_hero @anjemchoudary You actually want more soldiers to kill more Muslims and call them heroes. I don't expect you to agree with me.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@stephc47 @anjemchoudary Any organisation that calls soldiers who are injured invading Muslim countries *heroes* makes its position clear.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@stephc47 @anjemchoudary There are plenty of non-Muslims who do not agree with invading Iraq and Afghanistan. @STWuk @Corbyn4Leader

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@stephc47 @anjemchoudary I am only suggesting that that military charity change its name to something else.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@stephc47 @anjemchoudary @STWuk @Corbyn4Leader Do you deny that Western foreign policy causes Muslim terrorism?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@stephc47 Are you saying that the Iraqis and Afghans welcomed NATO invasion?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@stephc47 @anjemchoudary "Help 4 Islamophobic Victims of UK Foreign Policy Who Joined the Armed Forces To Kill Muslims in Iraq/Afghanistan"?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@stephc47 @anjemchoudary "H4IVOUKFPWJTAFTKMIIAA"? https://t.co/RRMAyNo1Sr

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@stephc47 @anjemchoudary "Help For Those Who Do and Die But Never Question Why"? "H4TWDADBNQW"?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@stephc47 @anjemchoudary How about Help For Injured Soldiers? "H4IS"?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@secular_hero You are the one who keeps insisting soldiers who kill Muslims while invading their countries are heroes.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@secular_hero You still don't get it that the word "soldiers" is not synonymous with "heroes"? Are you able to look up a dictionary?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@bonkersjeremy @anjemchoudary Help for Heroes is a charity that says UK soldiers who kill Muslims while invading their countries are heroes.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@bonkersjeremy @anjemchoudary Even a primary school pupil knows that the word soldiers does not mean heroes, so what are you playing at?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@secular_hero I am glad you have finally accepted that the word soldiers is not synonymous with heroes.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@secular_hero I wonder if @anjemchoudary would like to draw the attention of @ChtyCommission to the offensive nature of Help for Heroes.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

Someone at @ChtyCommission wasn't doing his/her job when they let Help for Heroes slip thru the net. https://t.co/FzYxhuehmz @anjemchoudary

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

https://www.gov.uk/how-to-choose-a-charity-name

avoid using words or acronyms that could cause offence in English or another language – the commission won’t register charities with names that could be offensive

@DNA_Cowboy @secular_hero @anjemchoudary To be a hero is a conscious intentional act. To end up a war casualty is not by definition heroic.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 22, 2015

@ntfem @secular_hero @anjemchoudary why r you connecting military heroes with 'war casualties'? I expect you must mean terrorist casualties?

— DNA Cowboy (@DNA_Cowboy) June 23, 2015

@DNA_Cowboy @secular_hero @anjemchoudary What is your definition of a military hero?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 23, 2015

@ntfem @secular_hero @anjemchoudary http://t.co/NF3kXflX88

— DNA Cowboy (@DNA_Cowboy) June 23, 2015

@DNA_Cowboy @secular_hero @anjemchoudary Was Andy Peat the recipient of charity from @HelpforHeroes?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 23, 2015

@ntfem @secular_hero @anjemchoudary @HelpforHeroes no idea, however, I am sure he supports the charity, regardsie: end of conv -work to do.

— DNA Cowboy (@DNA_Cowboy) June 23, 2015

@DNA_Cowboy @secular_hero @anjemchoudary Are all the recipients of charity from @HelpforHeroes military heroes as you define them?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 23, 2015

Should white male soldiers be made to sacrifice their lives so that the matriarchal West can impose feminism on the Afghans?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-24104436
Top Afghanistan female police officer dies

Has feminism been good to white male soldiers?

Has feminism been good for white men?  

Has feminism been good for white women?

Has feminism been good for the West?

Is the West like a rabid dog let loose upon the world?  

Cleaning ladies get a windfalll while soldiers paid a pittance die for women's rights in Afghanistan

http://www.birminghammail.net/news/local-news/birmingham-city-council-workers-win-263289

"Some former full time care workers could be awarded as much as £100,000."

The matriarchy is in full swing all right.

Daryll Christopher:

"Government cleaners and some single mothers on benefits earn much more than low level soldiers who risk their lives. They are paid less simply because they are men, and the life of a man is very cheap.

https://www.yourcounciljobs.co.uk/JobDetails.aspx/17929/Part_Time_Cleaners/?sAuthority_id=1

Part Time cleaners £12,312 - £13,589 per annum

http://www.armedforces.co.uk/armypayscales.htm

Full Time Rookie Soldier £13,895

I would mutiny if I were a soldier not yet dead and still with my full complement of limbs, stationed in Afghanistan paid a pittance to invade another country in the name of women's rights.

But theirs is to do and die and not ask questions of this damned demented matriarchy.

It seems they will keep dying like flies in Afghanistan too stupid to ask the reason why until there is no one left to overthrow this fucking stinking mess.

Soldiers cannot go on strike, but they can MUTINY

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/defence/9337175/Soldiers-sacked-days-before-pension-date.html

How Ken can mop up a few more votes and give Boris a haircut on May 3

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/apr/25/ken-livingstone-elect-chat-show-host?CMP=twt_gu

We could have a recorded debate on immigration, Islam, the war, the economy, law and order, the Americanisation AKA dumbing down of British politics, how he sees the future etc.  Or he could just allow me to interview him and blog about it.

If he wants me only at arm's length we can do this by Twitter or Facebook.

Over to you, Ken, to mop up votes from "Far Right" Londoners if you position yourself with just the right choice of words.

The only thing Ken has done that the BNP would approve of is his anti-war stance, which is in agreement with their own.

Boris hasn't even got that because that twerp voted for the war.  

Now is the time to see if all London voters care about is their own pleasures and their own comfort and that they don't give a damn about messing up other people's countries and ruining their lives.  

For all London voters who hate the war and what is being done in their name voting for Ken ought to be a no-brainer.

Now is the time to see if Londoners are mere sheeple dazzled by the public school charm of their Etonian mayor (with Prime Ministerial ambitions) who always makes a point of shying away from discussing controversial subjects and who VOTED FOR THE WAR, unlike Our Wise, Courageous and Independent-minded Ken.

Obama should have handed over the soldier who killed 16 Afghan civilians to Afghan courts without having to be askedd

http://www.voanews.com/english/news/US-Officials-Worry-Afghan-Killings-Will-Fuel-Anti-American-Sentiment-142305395.html

Surely any US President with imagination and humanity would have known to do that before he was asked?

"Support our troops" = send more of them to die for Blair, Brown, Cameron, Clegg, Bush, Obama, Israel and the whole Neo-Conning shebang ...

http://news.yahoo.com/six-uk-soldiers-believed-dead-afghan-explosion-090931109.html


What do these people who "support our troops" mean? Send more of them to die?

If they wanted to discourage them they should join Anjem Choudary in his demonstrations when he tells British soldiers that their efforts are not appreciated and that they are dying only to incur the hatred of Muslims and right-thinking members of the international community.

That would make more sense than waiting for them to die in Afghanistan so they can show their "support" by turning up in morbid mawkish crowds so they can start crying and having hysterics when coffins are driven past Wootton Bassett - a truly DISGUSTING practice the photographs of which can be seen at

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1248845/Wootton-Bassett-unites-grief-soldiers-bodies-return.html

Talk about giving succour to the enemy, eh?   A bunch of British pussies having a good cry, like the bunch of women they now are, and enjoying the experience.

This is what you are dying for, you bunch of fucking SUCKERS.

If they were half the men they ought to be they would MUTINY.   Too bad I ain't in Helmand myself., or the British public would be treated to a different kind of a story and be preparing for a military coup, as I bring the boys back to sort out a few things back home so I can give Westminster a bit of a spring clean ....

Would it really be treasonous to storm Parliament during PMQ and take out the whole lot of them if you were leading a military coup?

It you called elections immediately afterwards, we would still be a democracy, wouldn't we?

Is it treason to rescue the Monarch from elected politicians who are misgoverning Her country, and actively colluding in the deaths of Her subjects for WHAT?  The Neo-Conning political clases can NEVER explain this adequately or coherently.

The honourable hard-working ones - John Baron MP, Peter Bone and Frank Field come to mind - will be warned to stay away from PMQ on the day.

As for the BBC lot, the ones who don't feel they can work with the new regime would leave the building before the military dictator drops in on them after his spring clean of the Commons.

The post Cameron Commons would operate as if Peter Bone MP's House of Commons Disqualification Bill were in force.

http://conservativehome.blogs.com/parliament/2010/10/peter-bone-seeks-to-abolish-the-flatterers-cajolers-and-sometime-bullies-that-are-the-party-whips.htm

It is such a cheering scenario: the corpses of Cameron, May, Hague, Clegg, Maude being dragged out of the Commons in a trail of blood by the soldiers who would otherwise have been blown up in Afghanistan ....

I really hope that some enterprising Lieutenant Colonel will give this idea his serious consideration.

If Britain had been an Islamic state operating a system of direct democracy before WW2 Britain would not have lost its empire

Direct democracy is the only form of democracy worth discussing. That was the purest form of democracy as practised by the Ancient Greeks, and it is this version that the Koran recommends.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shura#cite_note-1

The Ancient Greeks voted on what laws to pass and what laws to repeal and whether to go to war.

Governments who consult the governed fare better than the rest because they can at least have a proper debate, take responsibility for whatever was decided and move on, while we cannot, because we feel abused, marginalised, ignored and betrayed.

Imagine, if the British had been asked about WW2, would Britain have lost its empire that was acquired with so much blood, sweat and tears by their ancestors?

But Churchill threw it all away because he wanted to be a war leader.

It was he who frittered away the inheritance of the British people.

When people like John Tyndall (who founded the BNP) complained with words to the effect after the war that Britain lost her empire for ignoble reasons and only gained the ignoble rewards of liberal decadence ie feminism, sexual licence, the emasculation and the disgusting feminisation of the white man and the uncontrolled immigration that would change the character of this nation forever, he was branded a Nazi and discredited by the liberal media.

After WW2 and after the loss of its empire, Britain could only comfort itself with the welfare state and the soft sweet luxuries of sexual liberation and easy divorce. But what did the welfare state that supported feminism and sexual licence do to the British ultimately?

The welfare state led to family breakdown, single parenthood, widespread illegitimacy, fatherlessness, ever lowering standards of education and morality, the worship of Mammon in the form of our sex and shopping society.

In short, the welfare state fueled by rampant consumerism created a culture of irresponsible borrowing and lending by government and individuals, the boom-bust cycle, all of which eventually led to the credit crunch affecting the entire Western world, who are now economically, morally bankrupt and heartily despised.

Perhaps it was ordained for the British to suffer the presence of Muslims, and to watch the people they regarded as a brown inferior race with a primitive religion surpass them in numbers, wealth and achievement in such a short space of time.

In the recent riots of England, whites joined in with the blacks to loot the shops of the browns, who are mostly the people these days who do any real business and who have property to protect.

It just shows you the strength and superiority of those who practise family values supported by marriage, compared to those once racially superior white affluent liberal atheists who thought they were above that sort of thing, but who are now effeminate reptiles and dogs, without honour and without shame, degraded and utterly contemptible in their cowardice and hypocrisy both in their domestic and foreign policy.

Imagine the kind of people who think the rest of the world is stupid enough to believe that they are invading another country for the good that country!   Their own people may be stupid enough to believe that, but it is sheer ignorance and arrogance to think others not subject to the British education system would be quite so susceptible to this sort of liberal claptrap.

Staggering, they will soon fall down on the pavement dead drunk, but not after vomiting and involuntarily defecating in the manner of drunks who really have had too much to drink, after all the partying they have had.  The rest of the world waits patiently, ready to kick their head in when this happens.

The lower the morals of women, the lower the morals of men.  And the morals of white working class slut, slag and slapper is very low indeed as they necessarily must be to have so many variously-fathered illegitimate children at the expense of the taxpayer in Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland.

Around half the children born in Britain are now born out of wedlock.

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23427447-more-than-half-of-all-british-babies-are-born-out-of-marriage.do

Think of how low the morals of the male political establishment must be, if they are afraid to criticise these sluts, slags and slappers who have variously-fathered bastards at the expense of the taxpayer.  It is no surprise that they do the things they now do in the world.  One can only hope that China and Russia eventually work up the courage to stop these fools and knaves in their tracks, with one neatly planted sucker punch, for the sake of world peace and to put an end to the toxic ideology of liberalism, which has delighted us for quite long enough.

Stupid bitch dies in stupid war for Bush, Blair, Brown, Cameron and Clegg

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/defence/8462836/Female-bomb-disposal-expert-dies-in-hospital-after-blast.html

Any soldier in Afghanistan who is dying for nothing instead of mutinying against this shit policy of being in Afghanistan are stupid bastards and bitches. But plenty more where they came from, eh?

British troops out of Afghanistan NOW.

Do not honour stupid bitches and stupid fuckers who willingly die for nothing and are happy to die for the dreary ceremony that is Remembrance Sunday.

Wake up stupid bastards and stupid bitches before you get blown up for Bush, Blair, Brown, Cameron and Clegg.

It is YOUR funeral, or soon will be, stupid.

If you have friends and family in the Armed Forces, tell them to mutiny before more damage is done to the reputation of this country IN YOUR NAME by Cunt Cameron and his warmongering fuckers.

It is YOUR country and in YOUR name Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya are being invaded in.

Do you know how much the rest of the world hates us?

Yes, they really really HATE us.

They kill Christians in their country to show how much they hate us and we still don't get it.

Boy, are we STUPID.

Khaw's Dolls and Effigies for Voodoo, Torture and Execution

I have just had a wonderful idea about making voodoo dolls of hated national figures. The David Cameron and Martin Amis doll would sell well, I think.

Khaw's Voodoo Dolls .... Dolls would have balls so you can have the satisfaction of ripping them off. Dolls would also be specially manufactured to ooze blood and spill guts to make the experience more authentic. A voice that cries out in pain? Dolls to burn at the stake? Dolls to hang, draw and quarter?

Accessories would be gallows and guillotine ... Perhaps an executioner's axe or sword. We could even have a pretend lethal injection thingie ... The possibilities are endless.

Khaw's Dolls for Execution with Accompanying Accessories.

When I am Mayoress of London, I will have specially appointed places for effigy-burning.  I believe that even the BNP would be happy to adopt the Indian and Pakistani custom of the effigy-burning of hated people and then smacking them with a stick as they burn on the ground.

Here is a clip of the Afghans burning an effigy of Obama.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pgYc6cS9OKA  I would see to it that British effigies would have a stronger resemblance to the hated person in question.

Fox: 'We're not going to leave' Afghanistan in 2015

Defence Secretary Liam Fox says large numbers of UK forces "may or may not stay in Afghanistan" after the end of "official" combat operations.  

http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_9208000/9208388.stm

Liam Foxes message is what is called "mixed signals" showing infirmity of purpose, self-doubt while hinting at ultimate defeat and national humiliation, which he wishes to deny until it is in fact practically impossible to do so.

If I were the Taliban I would be insisting on unconditional withdrawal while staring fixedly at the British invader.

It is only a matter of time before the British look down, burst into tears, and run away with their tails between their legs.

They can't take any more of dying for Israel, Bush, Blair, Brown and Cameron in a cause that is clearly against their national interest, can they surely?

They are not that strong anyway but are they really that stupid to keep taking the casualties for such a dubious cause as Neo-Connery?

Neo-Conservatism is nothing more than the US going around behaving like a bull in a china shop, with the British poodling along while the rest of the world vows terrible vengeance.

If only the British would realise that such blind adherence to an ignoble tradition of canine servility is not in their best interests, particularly when the Americans will soon run out of credit and goodwill.

In the meantime the war radicalises its significant Muslim population who are doubtless plotting more 7/7s, driving the police into a frenzy of over-surveillance, racial antagonism and the passing of liberty-killing laws that will affect non-Muslims too.

The trouble too is that the non-Muslims who hate the war hate Muslims more than they hate the war.

They are also very sentimental and treat Remembrance Sunday like a sacred national ritual when it is in fact nothing more than a dreary annual act of remembering death and defeat, while refusing to deal with present realities. It would appear that the British are keener to remember their dead soldiers than strive to prevent further pointless sacrifices of life and limb in their currently live soldiers.

Such is the sentimentality, mawkishness and irrationality of the typical Briton that there is no reasoning with him.

We should not underestimate the stupidity of the people or indeed of our government. Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain.

Asghar Bukhari of MPAC defriends me for saying Muslims MUST and SHOULD continue to protest offensively against the war

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asghar_Bukhari

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Public_Affairs_Committee_UK

Asghar Bukhari has defriended me on Facebook because I said that anti-war protests must necessarily be offensive to work and that Muslims Against Crusaders  were doing a good job really.  No pain, no gain and all that.  

I suggested that MAC would do better for themselves if they pretended they cared about white working class British soldiers being sent to Afghanistan to die for Israel, Bush, Blair, Brown and Cameron and all the warmongering MPs who voted to invade Iraq and Afghanistan.  Instead of the MAC calling British soldiers murderers, rapists etc who deserve to roast in hell, they should instead express their deep concern that these soldiers are dying for a lost and dishonorable cause which is in any case against the British National Interest and invite the BNP to join them in protesting against the war. 

It could be pointed out to the Wootton Bassetters by MAC in slightly more emollient tones that dying in a dishonorable and disgraceful unwinnable war is far far worse than converting to Islam in prison after having been court martialled for mutinying.. 



Asghar response was:

"Claire what are you on about? If you think that faking it is the best wat forward you have serious problems."

and then he defriended me without waiting for an answer. 

I just wonder what's so wrong about that though.

Understandably Muslims are nervous about being hated even more than they are already, but if the war carries on and the MAC carry on the way they have been doing, the hatred against Muslims would rage more ferociously anyway. 

It does seem that Roshanara Choudhry (is she any relation of Anjem's, I wonder?) has probably done us all a favour by stabbing Stephen Timms.  If more of them are stabbed, this would make it more likely for for MPs who voted for the war at


http://www.naba.org.uk/CONTENT/TheAssociation/Parliament/MPs_Vote_War_on_Iraq.pdf

to express remorse, regret and recant, like Clare Short.

Once enough of them do - whether out of genuine remorse or because they fear for their lives - our boys will be home sooner with less loss of life.  Once the war ends, there will be no more Wootton Bassett coffin drive-bys for the MAC to attend in order to provoke the local populace, and Muslims will not be quite so hated. 

Will someone please tell me exactly what is wrong with this piece reasoning?

Sometimes you have to keep pushing at something until it gives.  Half measures are just a waste of time.

Proposed survey for MPs who supported the invasion of "Afraq"

The stabbing of Caesar on the Ides of March

In  the light of Stephen Timms' stabbing by an anti-war Muslim constituent, may I suggest that the BBC conduct a survey amongst the MPs who voted for the war?

They must be gravely concerned about their personal safety.  Indeed, some of them may even have  nightmares of being stabbed, Ides of March style, by their Muslim constituents, especially the ones who have constituencies in Muslim majority areas.

Below are 10 questions that could be put to them:

1. Now that you have the benefit of hindsight, would you still vote for the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan if you could turn back time?

2. Was any pressure applied on you in any way at all to vote for the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan?

3. Was this pressure applied by the party whip?

4. Do you think the existence of the party whip has the effect of alienating a politician even further from his conscience and integrity?

5. Are you aware of Peter Bone's House of Commons Disqualification Bill due for a Second Reading on 10 December 2010?

 http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2010-11/houseofcommonsdisqualificationamendment.html

6. Has any pressure (explicit or implicit) been applied on you to not support this bill?

7. Did this pressure (explicit or implicit) come from your party whip or your leader?

8. Will you be giving in to this pressure or resisting it?

9. If you intend to give in to this pressure, ie not support the House of Commons Disqualification Bill, what are your reasons for doing so?

10. Would you like to express remorse for voting for the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan in the hope of reducing the likelihood of being stabbed "Ides of March" style by your Muslim constituents?

"Responsibility for this tragic outcome rests squarely with the hostage takers"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-11508230

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11508683

I do hope the latest death of yet another female do-gooding bleeding-heart will discourage more do-gooding bleeding-hearts from going there.  Clearly, the late Miss Norgrove had nothing better to do with her life than minister to those who were clearly outraged by the audacity of her ministrations, and so paid with her life.  The Afghans want us to fuck off out of their country.  How many more Britons must they kill before the penny finally drops? 

Foreign Secretary William "Don't Call Me Gay" Hague said:

"Responsibility for this tragic outcome rests squarely with the hostage takers."

But you would say that, wouldn't you, because you and your stupid stinking fuck of a party voted for the war.

Fox: UK 'will not give up' mentoring Afghan army

http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8818000/8818527.stm

The best thing to happen is for the people who started it to be punished.

I am afraid this means us.

Then there would be a satisfying moral to the story:

The moral of this particular story would be:

1. Do not start wars lightly, unadvisedly or wantonly.

2. Certainly do not start wars like that that you cannot win.

3. An unexamined foreign policy is a foreign policy not worth implementing (Is it in the long-term national interest or just knee-jerk American Poodle-ism? Is it just so Blair and talk about "fighting shoulder to shoulder" with the world's most powerful but most unpopular nation? Is any of this worth the life of a single British grenadier? Is Israel?"

4. Do not go so mad with nannying dementia that you think you will get away with saying that you are only invading other countries so you can nanny them into being better more PC-liberal nations, ie doing things your way.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8818000/8818527.stm

This would be laughable if it were not so tragic. Why don't we ask these Afghans if they want to be "mentored" by a civilisation in the terminal stages of dementia?

Why would they want be "mentored" by a country governed by fools and knaves who invade other countries telling them that it is for their own good?

Not content with having a nanny state we invade other countries to nanny them? Incredible, but true.

What are British soldiers dying for now? Zionism? America's foreign policy of unquestioningly supporting Israel? Now British soldiers are dying for Afghans who hate them, want them out of their country and want to kill them.

Does this country have a Jesus complex?

Are British soldiers to die for all the world to save it from its sins?

It is immoral, indefensible and incoherent.

If I were a soldier I would mutiny than die for the knaves and fools who sent me there to die for nothing.

A question for Muslims

Is it better to vote for

1. a party that has the most policies you agree with but says it hates and fears you yet does no more than hurt your feelings

or

2.  a party that says it likes you but harms you and people like you in other countries?
 

Taliban contemptuously refuse to negotiate with Loser Nations. You have to admire their spirit.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/10471517.stm

Taliban show of strength rather impressive to a country of wusses. They know that to keep saying they want to send us all back in body bags is enough to frighten the British because they are all basically stupid, scared and skint anyway. The wise and brave in this country think the war was a stupid idea. Only the stupid and truth-denying even attempt to defend the invasion.

In the meantime, can you imagine the funding the Taliban must be getting from the ummah, enthusiastically sponsoring the giving of a good kick to the remaining teeth in the gap-toothed mouths of the allies of Israel?

Now Hague says there is no military solution!

Too right. We are all getting tired of Wootton Bassett coffin drive-bys, aren't we? How much more can we take?

Seven a day yesterday. Time for a rethink, if we had any sense, not that we do.

Besides, we are skint.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1290658/Wootton-Bassett-stops-remembrance-British-soldiers-killed-Afghanistan.html

Scenes of Britons crying in public suggest that our spirit is fundamentally broken anyway.

No, worse, the British *don't even know not to cry* when they have been hurt.

In the old days, when the British ruled the world, they did so because they embodied masculine and aristocratic virtue.

Now, after decades of matriarchal degeneracy, it is quite clear that the British have embraced all the feminine and proletarian vices.

What is to become of the spineless, witless, effeminate, infantilised Britons?

Why does anyone think these people can hope to win a war when they cry in public like a bunch of babies in a stupid war they can't even explain to themselves?

I am sure these images are transmitted in their entirety to Afghanistan, so that the Taliban can observe the effect they have had.

Talk about giving succour to the enemy.

That is why they won't negotiate and treat the British with such contempt.

The British cannot explain the war to themselves because "American Poodle-ism" is not something any decent, honourable citizen with an ounce of self-respect would wish to acknowledge or associate themselves with.

It would utterly destroy their self-esteem.

Blair went to war because Bush wanted to go to war.

Bush went to war because he was one dumb Texan who didn't think too much or too well.

That was why he went along with the Neo-Conservatism and Neo-Conservatism is all about behaving like a bull in china shop.

Bush was one dumb shit but Blair who has just been paid $100,000 ostensibly for his peace efforts in Northern Ireland by the Americans, saw the cleverness of helping a dumb shit President of a dumb shit US government.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/richard-adams-blog/2010/jun/30/tony-blair-liberty-medal-award-2010

British soldiers are therefore dying for Bush who was dumb, Blair who thought it was clever to do dumb things with dumb people, Brown who went along with it, and Cameron who voted for both invasions because he is a cunt of convictionless Conservatism. 

If British soldiers were being properly advised they would mutiny.

If I were in a position to, I would advise them to do precisely that.

Why shouldn't the agents of the Afghanistan invasion not be insulted if you disapprove of it?

Isn't a bit hypocritical and incoherent to condemn the invasion of Afghanistan and then forbid Muslims from mounting insulting protests, eg

'Butchers return' and 'What are you dying for? £18k'.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1286784/Muslim-protesters-brand-war-heroes-murderers-homecoming-parade-turns-violent.html?ito=feeds-newsxml#ixzz0r1DK9VOO

against the agents of the invasion, ie British troops? I think British soldiers who die in Afghanistan should know that their sacrifices are not being appreciated.

In fact, they should go AWOL if they had any sense.  Why anyone would die for Bush, Blair, Brown and now Cameron and Clegg is absolutely beyond me.

Liberal Orthodoxy v The National Interest; How to vote in General Election 2010

If you are going to vote LibLabCon, you are too stupid to vote.

If you vote for policies supported by parties that amount to a systematic cultivation of failure, you are too stupid to vote.

If you think Cameron is going to be better than Brown, after the hash he has made out of policy-making in the last five years since he became leader, you are too stupid to vote.

The Liberal Democrats are a party of porn stars and coprophiliacs, and are so out of touch that they think it is OK to be seen to be a party that tolerates this filth.

If you think the LibDems are a protest vote, you are too stupid to vote.

If you think "racism" is worse than loss of liberty, you are too stupid to vote.

If you are afraid to vote for a party because of its reputation of racism, though it has many policies that you actually support, you are too stupid to vote.

UKIP would appear to be the happy medium, though it has hedged its bets on the war and on the EU. If you think hedging its bets was a good idea then vote UKIP.

UKIP will not explicitly denounce the war and only offers us a referendum on the EU.

The BNP however states it would withdraw British troops now if it could, and intends to withdraw from the EU without holding a referendum.

If you prefer a party that was the most consistently against the invasion of Muslim lands from the beginning, then you know what to do. If there were any justice in the world, they should mop up the Muslim vote since many of their policies, such as government by referenda as well as corporal and capital punishment, are supported by the Koran.

But there is very little justice in the world and very little reason in Man.

The party that was right all along is unfortunately also unpopular and has been consistently demonised by the liberal media for many decades.

It remains to be seen if that party has the ability to attract enough votes to revolutionise the debate between Liberal Orthodoxy and the National Interest.

The longer the war carries on the more paranoid the government will get, the more paranoid it gets the more paranoid it will make us. It will then rob us of even more of our liberties and property.

Liberalism is rotten to the core because it has perverted its own ideals. Its supports are the unholy Quartet of Denial, Denunciation, Ostracisation and Censorship.

Let us hope it will have the decency to die before it does any more damage.

The worst kind of soldier's death

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8571674.stm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTH5Tmh9OIY

If you think you are joining up for the fun of killing a "Paki" http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/03/06/article-1256021-08886781000005DC-791_233x423.jpg when you sign up for Afghanistan, think again.

If you are signing up for the excitement of battle think again.

Most of the soldiers who die in Afghanistan die of being blown up by an IED usually, while they are looking for it.

It means having a job like road sweeping - hardly the most exciting job in the world - and then getting blown up.

None of the excitement of battle of running around shooting at people, running for cover, like in the movies.

Boring job, and then you get blown up, for Bush, Blair and Brown.

The Afghans have more fun, as you can see from the clip.