BNP Lunar House Demo

SMS from BNP member at the Lunar House demo:

"BNP demo at Lunar House is pure shambles. UAF yelling at us for the past hour. Pretty soon we are all going to start hitting each other because there is nothing else to do. Plenty of police here but not that many [sic]. No sign of Nick Griffin or Adam Walker. Steve Squire and Carlos Cortiglia shouting through megaphones."   1304

"Dauntless member of public wanders over an wants information or expresses support. Some people honking as they go past. Steve Squire has brought some excellent long banners."   1319

"Mistake here is to waste time yelling back at UAF. They are all about 20 n 2n [sic]"  1339

"Want to start chant of RIGHTS FOR WHITES. That would stop the left in their tracks. People taking our leaflets including some polite blacks. Lefties with good cameras staring at us grimly for ages, waiting for violence, perhaps."  1353

"Reds singing what we shall we do with the drunker sailor.  What for?"  1355

" 'What shall we do with the BNP - earlie in the morning?'  'We are Croydon, you are scum.'  'Do you see Nazis?'  'Build a bonfire, build a bonfire.'  Their chanting gets better organised and they get as close as they can."  1404

"Their average age about 20 except for some old mad lefties."  1411

"Carlos now yelling bad temperedly in Spanish.  Honestly!"  1414

"Needless to say yelling at the Reds for hours on end is a tactical mistake.  Everyone is fed up with it.  Only Carlos can be bothered to answer.  Police photographing us now, which seems sinister."  1421

"It would be so interesting to see what would happen if the police weren't here.  They remain impassive between us.  Reds, who earlier had a hammer and sickle flag: MORE IMMIGRATION, NO BORDERS, NO NATION!!!  On our side; ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!  Carlos mocks their la la las but he probably misses the subtleties."  1435

"Reds quiet suddenly, to listen to Carlos denouncing socialism?  No, they don't listen.  We should only speak to each other and to the public, not them.  Chanting resumed."  1440

"Embarrassing to have teenagers yelling at us about Auschwitz.  We yell back about Stalin.  Carlos produces a Polish nationalist who tells them his father was killed by the Russians at Katyn.  Bit of communication there for a while.  We are finishing at 3 thank goodness."  1451

"Some of them seen insane.  Screaming their heads off after 2 hours."  1459

http://www.flickr.com/photos/101175555@N08/
More pix.

Nick Griffin's speech to the Italians should have been in Italian

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6CKG784TEU

If you view this all the way to the end, you will find it very dull indeed.  However, there are lessons to be learnt from this.

This is really not the way to perform in front of expectant foreigners listening to your speech, is it?  The best way of charming a foreign audience whose language you do not speak is to address them in their own language irrespective of whether you speak their language or not.

Though you may fear making laughable errors reading without comprehension a foreign language, as long as you make it short, foreigners will be utterly charmed, especially by your egregious errors of pronunciation.  

If I had been Nick Griffin, I would have had Carlos Cortiglia write my speech out in Italian and then read it out to the Eyeties in my beautiful Italian accent.

This is all pretty basic.

Let us hope the next time he has to address foreigners who are also complaining about immigration he will have the sense to do as I suggest.

Let us also hope that it will be a Chinese audience next time.  I was in Hongkong recently and boy are they complaining about foreigners coming to their country to take the bread out of their mouths.  Oh, how they will be rolling round the aisles and laughing like drains at the tonal errors of foreigners trying to speak their language!  

Is Nick Griffin losing his touch?  Perhaps.  Do you think he should be pensioned off soon and let someone who can do the job and who does want the job to transform and ennoble Nationalism by snatching it out of the hands of racists and making it more inclusive?  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/claire-khaw-prepared-to-raise-funds-to.html Of course you do!

If you think Nick Griffin should accept my offer to pension him off, please email him at http://www.nickgriffinmep.eu/content/contact to tell him so.

No-hoper London Mayoral Candidate gets more votes than both Eurosceptic candidates added together

Sexy Siobhan

Naughty Nazi Claire

This means a pretty lady is more attractive to Londoners as a protest vote than UKIP and BNP.

Siobhan Benita received 83,914 votes.

UKIP candidate Lawrence Webb received 43,274  votes and the BNP candidate Carlos Cortiglia received 28,751

The combined votes of the Eurosceptic candidates (72,025) is still 11,889 short of the vote for the Pretty Lady.  That is nearly TWELVE THOUSAND VOTES, fellow Londonders!!!

Are most London voters just politically ignorant, stupid, unprincipled, vote with their penises or are they really just not bothered about the EU or immigration?

You tell me.

The logical way to have voted, if you are

1.  against stupid Neocon wars AKA liberal interventionism AKA being America's poodle AKA invading Muslim countries and robbing them of their oil in the name of human rights

2.  wish to withdraw from the EU

3.  concerned about immigration

would have been to vote UKIP (because it is the largest Eurosceptic party) and to vote for Ken (because he declared himself against the invasion of Iraq in no uncertain terms at the anti-war rally in 2003).

That was how I voted.  It therefore enraged me to find a UKIP and BNP supporter (both against the war too) giving their second preference vote to the Pretty Lady, after voting for their own party.

I eventually got the UKIP supporter to admit that he would have voted for Ken if Pretty Lady had not been a candidate.

I received a few outraged squawks from the BNP supporter who voted for the Pretty Lady after I was rather rude to him.  Why should he a BNP supporter, vote UKIP - a bunch of middle class Tories who look down their noses at the white working classes?

My response was not whether his vote would have benefited UKIP, but how it came across to our political classes to whom we want to give the strongest possible message of rejection and disapproval.

Sadly, they will think that in London - supposedly the most sophisticated city in the country - the voters are not that bothered about the issues Eurosceptics are bothered by.

It would appear that London voters are just degenerate tossers easily distracted from their grievances by pretty ladies and that their mayoral voting system is too complicated for the likes of them.

In the event it did not matter, because neither their second preference votes for the Pretty Lady would have been counted anyway.  However, the fact remains that they wasted their vote on a Pretty Lady when they could have cast it for Ken to make an anti-war point.

Had Ken won, it would have been delicious to point out to him that he owed his success to the Eurosceptic parties that he likes to call racist, fascist Nazi extremists.

POST MORTEM

What should the Eurosceptic parties have done to get a better result?

The BNP should have not expelled me and instead hung on to me as their mayoral candidate for dear life and supported me with all their heart and strength, obviously.  I would have changed the perception of British nationalism from being merely racist and xenophobic to something more intellectual, moral and sophisticated.

Failing that, UKIP should have admitted me and made me their mayoral candidate, and I would have got them some BNP votes too, as well as a goodly number of Muslim ones, for my knowledge of the Koran has been acknowledged, even by Muslim scholars.

But it was not to be, because both their leaders decided to play it safe.   It is quite clear to me now that most Londoners would have been prepared to be entertained and stimulated by my views on eugenics and arguments against feminism.  I may not be as sexy as Siobhan but I can be both funny and intellectually stimulating.

When a tidal wave or an avalanche is coming your way, I would suggest that the safest thing to do is not to stay exactly where you are and do and say exactly what you have done before ie being boring.  

2012 London Mayoral Elections proves Democracy a pernicious nonsense

http://www.lbc.co.uk/ukip-mistake-led-to-name-being-left-off-mayoral-ballot-paper-54492?fb_comment_id=fbc_10150812780833819_22053957_10150812810933819#f2603aac

http://www.lbc.co.uk/how-london-boroughs-voted-in-mayoral-election-54493

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-17961960

So today has shown that Londoners can't resist a toff who has been on TV and behaves more like a comedian than a serous politician.

It has also shown that most people gave their second vote to an air-head dolly bird whom they would secretly or not so secretly have sex with, for Siobhan Benita has all the attributes of a yummy mummy.

It has of course been a TERRIBLE result for the candidates of Eurosceptic parties whose combined vote would not have exceeded that of the pretty lady's.

I like to think that if I had remained the BNP London Mayoral Candidate I would have given the media a run for the money and said the things I felt needed to be said, particularly when answering the questions asked by Pink News readers.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/my-answers-to-pinknews-readers.html

I would certainly not have answered the questions like a mainstream politician of the LibLabCon, which was what Carlos ended up doing, for shame, for shame.

I would have discussed the eugenic purpose of the institution of marriage and invited the British to consider the reasons for their disgusting degeneracy, and suggest that they abolish their overweening nanny state for the sake of future generations.

It is sad to watch the BNP throwing away all the electoral advantage of being a fringe party who, like UKIP, tried to pass themselves off as an establishment party which meant being DEADLY DULL.

And that is why London voters voted for the pretty lady instead of the strange Uruguayan man at the BNP or the dullard Fresh Choice for London candidate.

Will Self at http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01gvwyj tells us it is not safe to be too safe and boring, because what happens is that the voter will be so bored he will just vote for the person they find most ENTERTAINING or FUCKABLE.

I may be no spring chicken but I think I can still probably do both if I lose a bit of weight, go more regularly to the hairdresser and tart myself up, better than anyone else in the political establishment.   I would win too, because I am prepared to take risks, and carry it off with aplomb, unlike the dullards and cowards who infest the Eurosceptic parties, who either think I am racially inferior or are just terrified that I might use their party as a launchpad to take over their country after I have abolished their laughable and contemptible political system called representative democracy, as indeed I would ....

MY answers to PinkNews readers' questions if I had remained the BNP London Mayoral Candidate

http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2012/05/02/bnp-london-mayoral-candidate-carlos-cortiglia-answers-pinknews-readers-questions/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Pinknews+%


Q1.   With about half of the UK’s HIV positive population accessing care in London what will you do as Mayor to ensure that treatment and care budgets are not further cut over the term of your office?

A1.   I will do NOTHING to ensure that the care budgets for the UK's HIV positive population accessing care in London are not further cut over my term of office.  London has more urgent priorities.

Q2.   What will you do as Mayor to support efforts to tackle the high rate of new HIV infections, particularly amongst gay men?

A2.   I will do NOTHING as Mayor to support efforts to tackle the high rate of new HIV infections particularly amongst gay men.  They really should know better by now.  "Supporting efforts to tackle the high rate of new HIV infections" sounds like you are asking straight people to pay for the sex gay people have, when they fail to practice safe-sex.

Q3.  As a lesbian and a parent I am concerned about homophobia in schools. What will you do with your community safety and policing role to lead on and tackle homophobia in schools?

A3.  I will do NOTHING to tackle homophobia in schools.  I am of the view that homosexuality should not be encouraged but should rather be discouraged.   I hope you are aware that all the Abrahamic faiths could be said to be homophobic.  Unlike the LibLabCon whom we oppose, the BNP will not encourage what religious people all over the world consider to be a SIN.

Q4.   In light of allegations of racism in the Met how are you going to make the Met friendlier towards those minorities?

A4.   I intend to pursue a RACIALLY NEUTRAL policy and treat no race any better or any worse than any other.

Q5.   The rift between the LGBT and Muslim communities in London has been very high-profile over the last few years, with homophobic crime on the increase and growing Islamophobia. What would you do to heal the rift?

A5.   I would advise the LGBT communities to be more discreet in their activities so as not to arouse the wrath of socially conservative people in general.  Prevention is better than cure, after all.

Q6.   The public perception of, and trust in, the Metropolitan police is at an all-time low. A police force which lacks the trust of the citizens it is supposed to serve loses effectiveness, making crime harder to prevent. This is a serious concern for minority groups that are at higher risk of crime, such as LGBTs, blacks, Muslims and the disabled. What would you do to reverse this?

A6.   You will find that young men of all races are statistically more likely to become victims of violence.  The perpetrators of violence are also from the same group.   I have absolutely no intention of prioritising the perceived needs of the groups you mention over the indigenous white community whose interests have been ignored and marginalised over the years.  As I have already said, I intend to pursue a RACIALLY NEUTRAL policy.

Q7.   Elderly LGBTs are one of the most economically vulnerable groups in our society. Few have families, often because until relatively recently the state severely restricted LGBTs’ ability to have children through adoption or similar means, and also because until relatively recently it was very common for LGBTs to be disowned by their parents and siblings upon coming out. If elected, what will you do to combat the economic and social deprivation they face?

A3.   There is a reason why people go through the expense and trouble of rearing children. Ultimately, it is to feel that they will have offspring who cares what happens to their elderly parents.  If you encourage more people to be LGBT then society will be taken over by the dependent and elderly who have no children to look after them.  That is perhaps one of the reasons why all the Abrahamic faiths have regarded homosexuality as an abomination.  No, I will do nothing to help them because they have brought all this on themselves.  Let their poverty in old age and their loneliness be a lesson to us all against the evils of the selfish heedless hedonism of homosexuality.

Q8.   Many legal protections have been established in the last 20 years that benefit LGBT people. There are still more (eg bullying in schools, hate crimes) that could be that require cultural shift. How would you encourage London to shift its cultural perceptions?

A8.   I have absolutely no intention of encouraging more people to be homosexual if that is what you mean.  If I could I would repeal the Equality Act and allow owners of B&Bs to refuse to have homosexuals in their establishment, if that is what they want.

Q9.   Will you commit to de-twin the London and Tehran, the capital city of Iran, a country whose penalty for being gay is death?

A9.  I really had no idea that London has been twinned with Tehran.  Where on earth did you get that from?   I have no intention of stoning homosexuals to death.  The most I would do is give them a 100 lashes if they are caught cottaging.

Q10.   Do you think schools which cannot demonstrate sufficient action to address homophobic bullying should fail their Ofsted inspections?

A10.  Certainly not.  British schools should not encourage homosexuality anyway.

Q11.  Do you believe it is important that the mayor’s office supports benchmarks which measure diversity e.g. Stonewall Diversity Champions?

A11.  The BNP believes it is better for the future of the British Nation (and this means of all British citizens irrespective of our race) to discourage rather than encourage homosexuality. Stonewall Diversity Champions would encourage homosexuals to lord it over heterosexuals in the workplace, and I really think people have had enough PC gay rights policies being shoved down their throats.  The BNP would be false to its own to its principles if it did not try to stop this sort of thing and say so in uncompromising terms.

Q12.  Do you support plans by Tower Hamlets Cllr Khan who plans to ban “sex establishments” in Tower Hamlets in order to reduce female exploitation? Do you believe this should include the only gay pub in the area, the White Swan which has an amateur strip night?

A12.   I really think this is a matter for the residents of Tower Hamlets to resolve amongst themselves.   If the majority of the residents want to keep it open then it should stay open.  If they do not, then it should close.   I shall not interfere.

Schools to be prohibited from challenging gay marriage by PC police

http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_9717000/9717095.stm

0737
The Catholic Education Service has written to every state-funded Catholic school in England and Wales and asked them to draw the attention of pupils to the Coalition for Marriage's anti-equality petition. Austen Ivereigh, former press secretary to the Archbishop of Westminster Cormac Murphy-O'Connor, and Andrew Copson, Chief Executive of the British Humanist Association, debate the decision.

Listen to this very SINISTER interview.

Apparently, objecting to gay marriage means you are homophobic and against equality, according to the gay British Humanist, Andrew Copson.

Apparently, the BHA are saying that encouraging school children to keep marriage just for heterosexual couples in British schools should no longer allowed, because it is political, and engaging in politics (which entails debate and thinking through the issues) is therefore no longer encouraged in our schools.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/9227210/Catholic-schools-face-indoctrination-claims-over-gay-marriage.html

These people - ie the LibLabCon - are just steam-rolling their legislation, with no more than a token squeak of protest, while the nationalist parties and social conservatives are in complete disarray.

Below are my arguments against "Gay Marriage":

"Gay marriage" is an oxymoron.

Marriage was never meant for gay people, only for men and women who want to procreate and need rules to regulate their relations between each other and also as to the disposition of property in the event of the death of the one or both of the marriage partners.  

Why is marriage not for gay people?  Because they do not have children and have no moral obligation to stay with each other when one of them tires of the other.

"Gay marriage" is like a man wearing a maternity bra or a woman wearing boxer shorts.  It is purely and simply, FETISHISTIC.

Now, I hear that Carlos Cortiglia the BNP London Mayoral Candidate, has promised to defend feminism and gay rights against Islam in page 8 of this week's Time Out.  I was also told that the Time Out reporter was "astounded".

These benighted British Nationalists appear to have no idea that it was decades of chasing the female vote that has brought them to the abyss of national decline and racial degeneracy.

Feminism is a cancer.  Gay marriage is a tumour.

Claire Khaw sets out her stall *again* for leadership of a civic nationalist party that will eventually rival the BNP *and* UKIP

http://nationalistunityforum.co.uk/index.php/nick-griffin-for-the-good-of-nationalism-step-down-now/
Andrew Brons BNP MEP slags off incumbent leader of the BNP and invites Nick Griffin to stand down.

And then what?

He is too old to take over and parties like the BNP do not have the luxury of having caretaker leaders.  If they want a new leader he (or she) will have to be able to hit the ground running, be able to keep a fractious party together and connect with the public.

http://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=277526118997694&id=694016429&comment_id=1585263
Claudia Dalgleish has more revelations about her ex-boyfriend the London Organiser who is Number 1 on the GLA Top Up list.

MY RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE


I wish people would attack the party on policy grounds.

Ultimately, none of this is going to make the party fall because the people who vote BNP would be OK about sex shops, the aphrodisiacs that they sell and drug use in general. This is probably true of most white voters whom we all know are liberal and licentious on sexual matters.

Even the scandal about the Chairman exposing himself to Claudia Dalgleish in her car was a bit of a damp squib. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2106633/BNP-leader-Nick-Griffin-sex-pest-exposed-glamour-model-car.html?ito=feeds-newsxml  The male members who supported him assumed he had done it, but said Claudia must have led him on, as if it were OK for a leader of a political party to be excused anything just because he was "led on" by a scarlet woman.

Most depraved white British men of all classes would probably be happy to admit that they could never in any circumstances refuse a blow job, no matter who was offering it.

Knowing them, they would feel that having a GLA member who has a bit of a Hugh Hefner reputation would add a bit of glamour to British nationalism.

The BNP have to have Steve Squire because none of them have the money or the guts to do it, and Nick Griffin was never going to let Jeffrey Marshall be the London Mayoral Candidate even if he could pronounce "London" properly, unlike Carlos Cortiglia, the Uruguayan BNP London Mayoral Candidate.

Poor old Jeffrey, who is now being punished for daring to discuss to alight briefly on the subject of eugenics, when he and I objected to the fuss being made about Ivan Cameron's death, whose father had used the NHS to win the sympathy vote, all at expense of the British taxpayer.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2009/05/in-context-jeffrey-marshalls-comments.html

It would appear that the BNP want someone foreign to be their London Mayoral Candidate in just the way major supermarkets prefer foreign labour and the way some white men prefer to have an oriental for a wife because they think she will be more submissive and clean the house and cook better and more often.

What is Andrew Brons doing these days anyway? He is just whingeing from the sidelines and not offering any new ideas.

There is really no alternative to Nick Griffin. However crap disgruntled nationalists think Nick Griffin is, they cannot find anyone better, and that is the bottom line.

The only person who can obviously do it better is me, and these men are never going to be led by someone who is female and foreign. Why, she might even do much better than Nick Griffin, tell them the truth about what is wrong with this country, do what is necessary to take the party to new heights, but that would never do, because white male pride would never cope with being led by a female and a foreigner, even if she is obviously better.

Better the weeds of Nick Griffin to the fruits of Claire Khaw, they will  intone solemnly, like a mantra ...

All that  needs to happen now is for a prominent nationalist to get in touch and we will be Up, Up and Away http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIxm0Th55Iw&feature=fvwrel, but I know many will be inhibited from making such a move, probably because they will have no inhibition in admitting to a fear of flying.

The only way to take British nationalism forward is to NOT be seen to be hating Jews, Muslims, other races or foreigners, but take some of the responsibility for the ills of the nation because of the whole scale submission by the men of Britain to the emasculating effects of feminism.

The only way to make people listen to you is to convince them that you are nicer and smarter and braver than anyone else around, that you really have solutions to the problems, and are not afraid to say things that need to be said.

But this is something that no British nationalist has the courage and the generosity of spirit to do, and they will go back to their tired old ways of whingeing about the Jews, Muslims, foreigners and their own white traitorous liberal politicians, while pathetically hoping for some no-strings sex from the nearest Slut Single Mum.

Jews and Muslims practice family values supported by marriage and their women are better mothers, have more children, so they easily overtake the white working classes.

Why would anyone want to vote for a party whose members are men who cannot compete with immigrant labour in the field of unskilled labour and whom no employers in their right mind would want to hire anyway?

They also go around carrying carrier bags in their lower class way. Only poor men and bag ladies use carrier bags to carry their belongings around in, but they don't care, not even when I point out again and again that the British voter is an incorrigible snob and will never ever vote for a party of poor lower class people who go around carrying their belongings in carrier bags who don't go on foreign holidays often enough to like foreigners.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/real-reason-why-bnp-are-despised-and.html

Of all the BNP activists whom I have heard speak in my time as a BNP member, only Robert Bailey the ex-London Organiser told them to pick up a book occasionally in one of his typically inspirational speeches, for the sake of their race and their nation.

If only the media would ask Nick Griffin why he is so crap when liberalism is just a rotten door waiting to be pushed open with a gentle nudge, but these days the liberal media are not encouraged to ask interesting questions, because they too are afraid of saying the wrong thing and losing their jobs.

Verily, the British live in a land of fools, knaves, cowards, hypocrites, sluts and bastards indulging simultaneously in all the seven deadly sins like there is no tomorrow.  There is really nothing at all you can do with these lemming-like people except watch in wonder and horror as they throw themselves off a cliff en masse.

You cannot appeal to their reason or their sense of honour or fair play because they genuinely do not understand these concepts any more.  If they have a vague idea of what these ideas are they certainly do not have it in them to act upon this thing called principle.

You see, lower animals who are singly-parented by their Slut Single Mums tend not to have the ability to reason with abstract ideas such as morality and the nature and purpose of having principles, and sons who are singly-parented by their single mothers do not learn or practice masculine virtues either at home or in their co-educational schools (who are in any case only staffed by the female and feminist-dominated teaching profession).

Should they get married they will be afraid to annoy and irritate their wives in case she divorces them and takes half their stuff before depriving them of contact with their offspring.

The only thing you can do to them to make them do anything now is to hurt them in the way a farmer would use a cattle prod to move his sheep from field to field, sadly.

How are the mighty fallen.

No comment from the complacent BNP on anti-racist hysteria crippling the operational efficiency of British police

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9184574/Metropolitan-police-commissioner-Bernard-Hogan-Howe-issues-racism-warning-to-force.html

Youths of all ages of all races in all nations know what the cops can be like when they collar you for one reason or another.

Let's face it young men are just not that nice to each other, especially if you divide them into different tribes.   Young white criminal suspects are often treated rudely by white police, before the immigrants arrived.

In Britain suspected criminals who are black will be treated more politely by white British police.

White suspected criminals can continue to be treated rudely by the police without fear of them playing the race card.

This is the liberal idea of improving race relations, which no one, but no one, but no one is prepared to question, not even the complacent BNP whose Chairman has not seen fit to comment on the ever shriller siren screams of anti-racist hysteria.   Not even a tweet from him.   More than his job's worth, I suppose.   

Interestingly, I have been told yesterday that I would not be welcome at the BNP London Mayoral Candidate's Manifesto Launch in North East London on Monday 9 April as a reporter.

Press and Media please ring Stephen Squire for details on: 07771 598 227
Members and supporters wanting to attend please ring Paul on: 07985 147 324

Do they doubt my ability to report impartially on the proceedings then?   

I actually tweeted approvingly of Carlos' performance on LBC the other day compared to the very dull Lawrence Webb.   

To be read in reverse order:

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
Well done, Carlos! @londonorganiser

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
Gives me such a warm glow to hear the BNP and UKIP London mayoral candidates agreeing with each other! @lbc973

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
"The Mayor of London has to revalue manual work," says Carlos. Excellent stuff!

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
"Why should anyone pay for parking outside his own home?" asks Carlos. Attaboy! Lawrence can be rather long-winded.

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
Carlos agrees with Lawrence about LEZ, and is much less boring. Good move, Carlos! @lbc973

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
LEZzzzzzzzzzzzz @lbc973 @Siobhan4Mayor

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
"Charity begins at home," says Carlos, mastering the art of the soundbite, while Lawrence waffles on about regulations.

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
I must say I think Carlos is coming off quite well compared to Lawrence Webb who is a rather dull chap.

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
Carlos says Olympic tickets printed in the US and merchandise made in China.

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
Carlos says "I can't make promises I cannot deliver."

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
UKIP candidate says BNP candidate naive to ignore immigration!

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
BNP has to be more inclusive, Carlos says. @lbc973

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
Carlos says he will represent people who are entitled to be in the UK irrespective of race.

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
BNP won't be campaigning on immigration, Carlos says.

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
Slight confusion on UKIP name with Lawrence Webb. @lbc973

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
It will be fun for me to imagine myself in the shoes of Carlos Cortiglia since I was once prospective BNP London Mayoral candidate.

3 Apr Claire Khaw ‏ @1party4all
UKIP and BNP London Mayoral candidates on @lbc973 http://www.lbc.co.uk/listen-live-3578

I do not need to attend the Manifesto Launch to tell you, dear reader, that everything the BNP does is a waste of your time and your money if they don't sort out their ideology and have a leader who cares about The Cause (by which I take to be the National Interest, rather than what lower class white people who cannot compete with foreigners in the field of unskilled manual labour would like to do non-white British citizens when they get into power).  Nick Griffin is clinging to leadership as a farmer would cling to his only milk-producing cow.   

Do not expect courageous decisions from this man, who has not seen fit to comment on Liam Stacey's 56 day imprisonment for blaspheming against a black footballer.   http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2121003/Liam-Stacey-jail-tweeting-abuse-Fabrice-Muamba.html  He calculates, correctly, that most BNP core supporters are too dim and too busy to notice.   The ones in the party who do are too frightened to criticise him because they do not want to be suspended or expelled.   

A member I know has been disabled from commenting from the BNP Facebook page for pointing out that Carlos Cortiglia, the BNP London Mayoral Candidate, committed an infelicity of expression when he talked about the BNP "setting London alight" and then went on immediately to discuss last year's riots.   

You would have thought that NOW is the time to build up a full steam of publicity on policies and principles for British nationalism, before the next General Election.  NOW is the time for all good men to come to the aid of the party, but this is not in fact what Nick Griffin wants, if these men have any possibility of appearing to be better leaders than him.   

Nick Griffin does not think the core membership will understand or bother their pretty heads with principles and ideology.  Nick Griffin is only interested in the lowest common denominator.  Nick Griffin is not interested in infusing the party with talent that might threaten his leadership, even if it would help the cause of British Nationalism.

And that is why the BNP is a waste of time and money under its current leadership.   

Carlos Cortiglia - 2012 London BNP Mayoral Candidate

LONDRES E MI PATRIA

ETONCES VOTA CARLOS POR MAJOR (PERO VOTA NO! SENORS BORIS Y KEN).

VOTA PNB (LOS PARTIDA NACIONAL BRITANICOS).

VIVA CARLOS Y LOS PNB!

CARLOS SI! SI! SI!

If I had proceeded to become the BNP mayoral candidate my leaflet would be full of Chinese slogans.  Now wouldn't that be a publicity stunt and a half?

I would be famous in China too and the darling of Xinhua News Agency ...

Carlos Cortiglia's maiden speech as 2012 BNP London Mayoral Candidate AKA the role of the Foreigner in Nationalist Politics

The speech was made on Thursday 22 September 2011.

It was, I was surprised and delighted to report, impressively statesmanlike.  

He began by addressing the accusations of him not supporting the right side in the Falklands War.  The reasons were convoluted and complicated, and the accusations are a "complete fabrication".  

I am myself not bothered either way.  At the time of the Falklands War, Carlos was not a British citizen, but lived in Uruguay and was an Uruguayan citizen.  

Supporting all the wars Britain involves itself in is not conclusive of loyalty, and opposing the last three wars is not conclusive of disloyalty either.

There are many racial nationalists who consider that WW2 should not have been fought.  This is not evidence of their disloyaly either, since many of them regard themselves as patriots and nationalists, or even national socialists.  Anti-Semitism is not conclusive of being a traitor to one's country.  It only shows that one does not accept the liberal narrative of history.  

Doubtless people in South America would have a quite different view towards the Falklands than the British and our perspective is coloured by where we live, whom we identify with, and a certain view of where our best interests lie.   

As a Civic Nationalist who feels that Civic Nationalism alone is enough to give Ethno Nationalists what they want, I am really not bothered about which side Carlos supported.  Britain won the Falklands War, and there may be another one soon when the Argies attack the Falklands again after realising that this country has expended its military resources on pointless wars in Afraqbya and can no longer defend its own territories or expect assistance from the Americans, but we will cross that bridge when we get to it, and know whom to blame.

Carlos praised Baroness Flather who courageously pointed out how the Bangladeshi and Pakistani community was milking the British system by coming here, having lots of babies as single mothers (for women under polygamous marriages are treated as single mothers by the welfare system) at the expense of the British taxpayer.  He praised her for saying what few indigenous and white politicians dare not say.

Below are my notes of his speech.

"I admire her [Baroness Flather] very much and made a programme about her."  (I have no details on this.)

"My role in the party is not as a personality but as a teamplayer."

He said that he bears me (who was expelled by the party for making comments found "unacceptable" to the party concerning the disabled on the Victoria Derbyshire Show) no personal animosity.  "Claire Khaw is not the enemy.  Eddy Butler and Andrew Brons are not the enemy.   We must keep talking.  We have a mission.  Divided we fall, united we have a chance."

"England expects that every man will do his duty."

"We will always have financial problems because we are not the established parties and even they have financial problems too."

"We are simple, ordinary, honest people ... "

"The Labour Party has offshore accounts ... "

"If we do not know anything [about managing our finances] we will learn."

"One of my favourite people in the BNP is Richard Edmonds."

"Bob Gertner is a man.  He built Croydon branch."

"I respect my BNP people."

He also praised Richard Barnbrook and attributed the party's success in Barking to his energy.  Sadly, he no longer takes the party whip after falling out with the party.  "If there is one regret it is to see what happened to Richard Barnbook. He did not sit down.  He made us deliver all the leaflets in the face of tiredness and despair."

"Many are our comrades even if we do not know it."

He mentioned the other failed mayoral candidates:

Michael Barnbrook is an "excellent candidate" but is too critical of the leader.

Jeffrey Marshall is known for making similar comments to me about disabled children.

Carlos writes for the Jewish Chronicle.  That was news to me.

"We will give the media a run for their money.  That is my mission."

I bear Carlos no animosity.   We political animals are a strange mixture of pride and humility, egotism and self-abnegation, wisdom and folly, and we acquire triumph and failure in different proportions depending, really, in our preparedness to carry on forgiving our critics and making friends of our enemies.  

When I entered the room, I was greeted with a jocular "Uh oh.  Here comes trouble."

When Carlos and I clocked each other we both nodded at each other in acknowledgement.

When he said "Claire Khaw is not the enemy", I smiled and nodded my appreciation.

When he finished his speech and came over to shake my hand, I found myself saying "I support you, Carlos."

His message of reconciliation is much needed in the circle of indigenous nationalists. Perhaps if we foreigners are the peacemakers amongst the fighting and fractious natives, then our contribution to nationalism in this country will become clearer and perhaps more generally appreciated amongst the ethno-nationalists who think we should not be in this country, let alone in their party.

For my part, I only wish to point out by my part, as frequently and as loudly as I can, that many of BNP policies are popular with non-whites whose instincts are culturally and rationally non-liberal and patriarchal.  

What the nationalist movement needs to do is to not make us feel we are turkeys voting for Xmas and pretend that all non-whites like liberal policies.   The Muslims are especially disgusted by liberal degeneracy that the liberal political establishment either deliberately promote or dare not condone, but dare not be seen to bite the hand that feeds them.  

By making reaching out to non-white British citizens, and getting more non-white British citizens and foreigners to support the BNP in public, it would make it more likely for the lily-livered indigenous liberal middle class brain-washed whites to get over their fear of voting for a party with a reputation for being racist.

BNP policies remain the most sensible in the land.  It is just unfortunate that those who support it are the equivalent of rough peasants, who know they are right, refuse to shut up when they are abused and intimidated by the liberal elite, but do not have the education and social skills to convey their message in a more appealing way.

Why Claire Khaw is attacking the *current* Prima Donna BNP London Mayoral Candidate

"Why is Claire Khaw attacking our mayoral candidate?" the BNP ask.

Because I think he will be a disaster and I want it noted that I said he will be a disaster and an embarrassment, even for a pariah party such as as they, when I hear things about him that show that he is clearly unsuited to be LMC.

He is behaving like a schoolgirl having a hissy fit, wailing and howling to all and sundry about my comments about him that were intended to be helpful.

I have said nothing untrue about him, so he really really cannot complain.

He is apparently complaining to the Chairman himself about me, as if he thought that something could be done about it!

How naive if he thinks anyone in this land could get me to delete any of my comments about him on my blog, without the benefit a High Court action, and then only if I have libelled him and only if he has hired very expensive lawyers and spent tens of thousands of pounds in legal fees.

Perhaps he thinks the Chairman could proscribe me. Imagine, little old me, poscribed just for my opinions!

Proscriptions
5 The Chairman may proscribe individuals, organisations or publications which are so hostile to our Party, or whose views and/or behaviour are so likely to bring discredit upon our Party, that Members should have no contact with them.

6 Such a hostile individual, publications or group is thenceforth regarded as a rotten apple and proscription is the means by which they are prevented from contaminating others. Not only are the proscribed barred from attending party functions and activities, but Members are barred from attending events organised by them and barred from sharing platforms with them, distributing or advertising literature and electronic media produced by or in support of them,and promoting events at which they are known or – in the opinion of our Party leadership – likely to be attending.

7 Proscriptions shall come into effect on publication in the National members‟ bulletin and remain in force until further notice. A full list appears on our Partt'website.

Claire Khaw - not only joined, but suspended; not only suspended, but expelled; not only expelled but proscribed!

Fancy!

The EDL is an organisation proscribed by the BNP.

Imagine, little old me, as scary and as dangerous as the EDL!

Fancy!

Expelled just for saying on the Victoria Derbyshire Show that I would not wish to bring up a severely disabled baby   http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/07/transcript-of-what-i-said-on-victoria.html

All for saying WHAT about Carlos exactly?

We don't even know which comment he found so objectionable.

Was it when I said that I speak better English than him?

Or that I write better English than him?

Or that I supported the right side in the Falklands War?

Anyway, I am not being destructive in my criticism of the Carlos, I am being constructive.  Indeed, I am being so constructive that I am proposing that Jeffrey Marshall - who made similar comments about the disabled for which he is now called Dr Death - should be their LMC.

I would be delighted to be the BNP Press Officer or Directrix of Communications (and there is nothing in the rules that say I have to a member of the party to be Press Officer) fielding all the predictably hysterical accusations and questions from the liberal media against Jeffrey about wishing to exterminate the disabled and threatening to sue them for libel if they do not mind their Ps and Qs.

It would be a pleasure and a privilege.

Currently, Carlos is Press Officer, but I think I may just be able to do the job better.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prima_donna

Yes, I do mean "prima donna", and not "primo uomo".  

A disturbing threat issued by Carlos Cortiglia to the BNP if something is not done about Claire Khaw

I have some rather disturbing news concerning the BNP mayoral candidate Carlos Cortiglia.

It seems he was unhappy about certain comments I have made about him at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/09/on-carlos-cortiglia-being-announced-as.html viz

5.  I [Claire Khaw] supported the right side in the Falklands War when Carlos was probably then an Argentinian nationalist (although he is in fact an Uraguayan).

But Carlos did publicly supported the Argies, as he admits in his statement:

"In 1982, the Oriental Republic of Uruguay expressed its political support for Argentina, but was very careful to ensure that its neutrality as a country would not be violated by Argentina. As a State employee and as a Uruguayan (not as a British citizen), I made a public pronouncement expressing the position of the Uruguayan government."

While I am aware that he has made a number of threats to "destroy" me while he was on the selection panel for the London mayoral candidate, I have been willing to let bygones be bygones, and have offered helpful advice to him such as suggesting to him on Friday 5 September 2001:

"Carlos was not a British citizen till 2001 so all that happened before and during the Falklands War of 1982 should be discounted, as he was then an Uruguayan citizen as well as an Uruguayan state employee obliged to toe the Uruguayan government's line of support for the Argentines."

and

‎"Those who support BNP policies have to support him now. He would get better support if I were Press Officer though."

and 

"The best way to deal with questions about his support for the Argies is to admit it and then move on.  Say he got one war wrong, but he was against the last 3 wars in Afraqbya (in line with party policy). This means he got 3 out 4 wars right. What is the score of sitting MPs? Most of them voted for the wars in Afraqbya, and this would make their score 1 out of 4."

However, it seems that my constructive comments were not taken in the spirit that they were intended and Carlos still thinks I am out to destroy him, in perhaps the way he said he would destroy me.  (Why would I bother if he is doing the job so well himself?  I am busy woman, after all.)

I actually took the trouble of checking if the Organisers who invited me to give a talk at the BNP meeting on 4 September were in fact breaching the rules, because I did not want them to get into trouble on my account, and believed they were covered by rule 19 and 23.

Rules Governing Official Meetings of a Branch or Group (page 90 of the BNP constitution)

19 No rigid rules shall govern the holding or conduct of Official Meetings or
Executive Meetings of a British Homeland Branch or Group save as are set out
in this Annex 4 or otherwise provided for in the constitution of such Branch or

23 Any Official Meeting of a Branch or Group may be open or closed to
guests as the Branch Organiser or Group Organiser shall determine on the
occasion each such Official Meeting shall be called.  

It seems that Carlos threatened to complain to Head Office about the fact that I was invited to give a talk despite being expelled, with the intention of getting the Organiser concerned into trouble, if he did not stop me from making comments which Carlos found objectionable in Voice of Reason.

In fact, the Organiser concerned promised he would look into it when Carlos rang him on the morning of 11 September.  However, instead of  having the sense to leave the conversation there, he tried to reinforce his request with a form of blackmail, implying he could make trouble for the Organiser, even though the Organiser concerned had already agreed to what he asked.  (This unpleasant habit is so ingrained that Carlos does not even realise he is doing it, suggested the Organiser, trying to excuse Carlos.)

Should they forgive such a heinous act of treachery?  Would they be fools to forgive such uncomradely behaviour from someone who is clearly a grass, and will probably issue similar if not worse threats again when the opportunity presents itself?

Should they give him another chance?  I know no one listens to me, but I would not do so, in their shoes.

The transcript of my talk, which concerned why British nationalism should also be about family values can be found at http://www.facebook.com/note.php?saved&&note_id=10150290579549144

Carlos did rather aggressively shout at me at the meeting, and said something along the lines of: "Don't talk to me about Family Values when the white working classes are disadvantaged.  Don't talk to me about Family Values when the white working classes are oppressed.  Don't talk to me about Family Values when the white working classes have everything against them."

I even refrained from asking him if I am to infer from his rant that he did not support Family Values supported by marriage.

Now it seems he is angry with the Organisers for not coming round and shooting me for making comments about him.

I would have been quite happy to display any comment he made in response to anything I have made here on this blog, but it seems he has not seen fit to contact me in person to clarify or correct me on anything I have said concerning any material fact.   I have said nothing about him that I know to be untrue, in any case, since he himself admits in his statement that he did indeed make a public statement in support of the Argentinians' claim to the Falklands.

unexecuted, undisappeared and unshot, presumably) he would withdraw himself as candidate and even said he would go to The Guardian to sell his story that the BNP are lunatics for inviting me to their East London meeting on 4 September 2011.

I am not quite clear what Carlos expects the BNP to do about me, since they have already expelled me.  Perhaps he would like me proscribed by the party for making comments about him?

Whether or not he means to carry out this threat, whether or not it was said in anger and that he now regrets it, it is too late for Carlos.  The news is out that Carlos attempted to blackmail the Party.

Whether or not the Organisers wish to dismiss this is a childish tantrum that they wish to overlook and forgive, my view remains that such a man is unfit to represent the BNP or indeed any party at all, no matter how small and insignificant.  If Carlos had the courage of his convictions he would have gone straight to The Guardian and have done with it, rather than make childish threats about doing so.

If I make a threat, at least people will know that there is a pretty good chance it will be carried out.

Even the supporters of the BNP - social pariahs though they are - do not deserve to be represented by someone whose political judgement is so demonstrably unsound.

If the BNP proscribe me because they want to please and mollify Carlos, then it is their prerogative.  It is really the marginalised that I wish to stand up for, not a party that claims to represent their interests.

There are times when one has a duty to speak out, even if one will be shot as the bearer of bad news.   There are those who think Carlos should remain candidate despite what he has threatened.  I do not agree with them and feel it is my duty to to say so in public.  I shall be sad to sacrifice my friendship with them, if they cannot forgive me, but Carlos has by his actions show his manifest unfitness to represent any party at all, and still less the BNP, who have all the bad publicity they need and who should just give up with dud candidates.  If they cannot find any decent candidates to represent them, then they should not put forward any at all.

JEFFREY MARSHALL TO REPLACE CARLOS AS LONDON MAYORAL CANDIDATE?

I think Jeffrey Marshall should be the 2012 BNP London mayoral candidate.  He was born in London, and is a grammar school boy whose father was a publican who had dealings with the Krays.   He graduated with a degree in History and Philosophy from the University of Kent, has lived abroad and can even speak Spanish.  He is musical and can sing very well.  Indeed, he was leader singer in a band during his student years.  He is also taller than all the other white male candidates and has participated in a ground-breaking debate between Muslims and the BNP, which, because it was civil and enlightening, and showed the BNP in a good light, was deliberately ignored by the liberal media.   Jeffrey could even be a potential leadership candidate, IMHO, despite his "Dr Death" comments about Ivan Cameron.  Indeed, Jeffrey even has a brother who is learning disabled, so all the dreadful things that the Left have been pretending that he wants to do to the disabled, eg exterminate them, is hysterical nonsense and can shown to be so.

There are perfectly good white male candidates available to represent the party and Jeffrey Marshall should the BNP London Mayoral Candidate.   There is no need whatsoever for the Party to put up with unreliable and clearly treacherous foreigners just to show that the BNP are no longer racist or xenophobic.

http://www.londonpatriot.org/2009/12/18/mr-jeffrey-marshalls-speech-to-muslim-debate-intiative/

http://www.londonpatriot.org/2011/02/23/muslims-debate-initiative-bnp-jeffrey-marshall-debates-muslims-on-islamification-uk/

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2009/12/historic-evening-of-debate-between.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2009/05/in-context-jeffrey-marshalls-comments.html
IN CONTEXT: Jeffrey Marshall's Comments about the unproductive

Let it not be said that Jeffrey Marshall put me up to this, for he actually told me to "make a brief clarification" to the effect that "Carlos didn't actually fight for the Argies on your blog".  This I am very happy to do so.    

On Carlos Cortiglia being announced as the BNP 2012 London Mayoral Candidate

Carlos Cortiglia the 2012 BNP London Mayoral Candidate

http://eddybutler.blogspot.com/2011/09/news-from-nowhere.html?spref=fb

http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/regional/carlos-london-british-national-party-mayoral-candidate-announced

"It could have been me, and it should have been me!!" 

would be the words my detractors wish me to utter in public, stamping my feet as I tear at my hair, rend my garments and gnash my teeth before the ground swallowed me up, as it did Rumpeltstiltskin ...

I therefore dedicate this little thought-present to them.

But how do I feel, how do I really really feel?

Well, I  had thought it was too good to be true that I would be really be the BNP mayoral candidate, but everyone was being so encouraging that I had thought it would be within my grasp.

I was not however prepared to stop saying what I feel to be the truth and to express what I felt were rational views - or even put that on hold for a few months - in order to avoid this glittering prize being snatched from my eager grasp.

I do not mind making that sacrifice and demonstrating the high cost of free speech in Britain these days, because it is a very important point to make.

We know who is in power by whom we are not allowed to offend, and those whom we are not allowed to offend are women who make poor reproductive choices, and whose existence become a burden to themselves and taxpayers.

Carlos makes no such statements of course.  He knows that the leadership of the British National Party would not dream of criticising the behaviour of its own members, only the behaviour of liberals and the immigrants who enter this country in great numbers to take the bread out of their mouths at the invitation of the liberals.

Whatever is wrong with this country, it is all the fault of foreigners and liberals, never the white working classes who buy into the sex and shopping pub culture and drug culture of a consumer society - because they know no other, these white working classes who live for physical pleasures before they die, without the promise of an afterlife.

Of course the white working classes cannot compete against these foreigners, for the liberal political establishment discourages all the things that would enable the white working classes to become respectable and fit for purpose, such as a good education and the moral guidance afforded by a religion that would promote family life, unlike the current state religion that is the degenerate Anglican Church - infested by liberals and infected by feminism.

That is why the British have no culture to speak of these days - unless you can call drugs and sex and rock and roll a 'culture'.  If it is a culture, it is the culture of the primitive hedonism, or what animals would do if they could live like us.

How sad then that the white working classes have no one who will advise and warn them.  They have been abandoned first by the liberal establishment and now by their own party that purports to promote their interests.

I like to think that if I had very bad breath or if my bum really did look very large in the micro-mini skirt that I am too ugly, old and fat to wear, someone would point this out to me, either gently or brutally, but, no, the white working classes do not even have the benefit of  close family or friends, no one who will advise and warn them, because they are frankly beyond all help and hope, and are now only fit to be exploited by all and sundry, even by their own political party claiming to represent their interests.

How do I feel then about another foreigner getting the job?

I like to think I can retain my objectivity, though doubtless many would accuse me of having it in for Carlos now.

There is nothing wrong with a foreigner doing the same job a local can do, provided he can do it as well or better.

Oddly, none of the other white male applicants was formally interviewed, and the Organisers were only given the option of rejecting Carlos, and Carlos had been on the selection panel from the beginning in any case.

I shall of course continue to say that I am the best candidate the BNP never had.  I would have been the best candidate because

Imagine Claire Khaw being photographed with a BNP rosette attached to a burkha , brandishing the Britannic shield and trident ...

1. I understand the media and know they like cut-and-paste stories which I help them to write, eg http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/8357620/BNP-members-pro-Gaddafi-Facebook-group-snares-politicians.html and   http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1362770/Colonel-Gaddafi-Facebook-page-signs-numerous-high-profile-figures-knowledge.html
2. I know journalists and have met them socially in my time.  (I believe Michael Cockerell http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/3669656/Michael-Cockerell-I-wont-skimp-or-play-nasty.html took rather a shine to me at the Orwell Prize Award this year.  Whether he did in fact or not you will have to ask him.)  
3. I write better English than Carlos.
4. I speak better English than Carlos.
5. I supported the right side in the Falklands War when Carlos was probably then an Argentinian nationalist (although he is in fact an Uraguayan).
6. I could pass for English if you closed your eyes, but not Carlos.
7. I have been consistent in my views.
8. I am legally-trained.
9. I am not afraid of saying controversial things, and, having said them, I am prepared to defend my positions through the use of logic and reason, however incomprehensible this is to the average Briton these days.  
10. I never back down if I think I am logically and morally right.
11. I could easily do better than the UKIP candidate because I talk their talk, in better written and spoken English than Carlos.   http://www.ukip.org/content/latest-news/2445-ukip-announce-london-mayor-candidate
12. BNP comrades have privately said to me that I am quite English in an odd way, eg I am like an English eccentric, and that I remind them of what the English used to be etc.  I like to think they are referring to my understanding of aristocratic codes of honour of a bygone imperial era that I gleaned and absorbed from books I have read about the English by the English.
13. I feel that the role of the BNP is to say the unsayable rather than pretend that they can pass themselves off as electable politicians when everyone thinks they are mad, sad and bad anyway.  
14. I have done a comedy course and know how to keep people engaged and entertained.  http://www.laughinghorsecomedy.co.uk/comedycourses/
15. I am known for my charm, wit, warmth, wisdom and inexplicable compulsion to stand up for the weak and oppressed, without for one moment expecting them to be grateful.  
16. Liberals hate and fear me because they don't know what to make of me.
17. Muslims like me, and no London mayoral candidate ever did well without the support of London's largest non-white community.   I would have the knowledge and have been prepared to point out the BNP policies that Muslims would find in line with Koranic principles, and have the chutzpah to solicit their vote.  (The Facebook Koran Book Club https://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=310958681842&ref=ts was my creation.)
18. My Facebook walls are a hang-out both for the White Nationalist community as well as a prominent Orthodox Rabbi.  (The Facebook Mein Kampf Book Club https://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=147429175288744&ref=ts was my creation.)
19. I actually have positive and radical ideas that include all the peoples of Britain, rather than the usual anti-immigrant and reactionary negativity that the BNP is known for.
20. I am prepared to take calculated risks.  Friends, lovers and enemies have called me "dangerous".  
21. I have principles and relish all opportunities afforded to me of sticking to them, even if it means I don't become the BNP mayoral candidate and end up getting expelled from the party because of what I said on the Victoria Derbyshire Show, when I said would not wish to bring up a severely disabled baby, nor pass the cost of its care to the taxpayer, like an unwanted parcel, and would expect the midwife to dispose of it for me.  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/07/transcript-of-what-i-said-on-victoria.html  Many people have  privately said they agree with me.  

HOW ARE WE TO JUDGE CARLOS?

He would be judged a failure if he does not do better than the UKIP candidate or if UKIP manage to narrow the gap.   

BNP   128,609

UKIP  113,651    

The gap between UKIP and BNP was 14,958 in 2008.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_mayoral_election,_2008

We shall see what we will see.