THE VOICE OF REASON
Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
Translate
Showing posts with label marriage contract. Show all posts
Showing posts with label marriage contract. Show all posts
"If we could survive without a wife, citizens of Rome, all of us would do without that nuisance.” So proclaimed the Roman general, statesman, and censor Quintus Caecilius Metellus Macedonicus, in 131 B.C. Still, he went on to plead, falling birthrates required that Roman men fulfill their duty to reproduce, no matter how irritating Roman women might have become. "Since nature has so decreed that we cannot manage comfortably with them, nor live in any way without them, we must plan for our lasting preservation rather than for our temporary pleasure."
The Romans had no fault divorce. In fact, one spouse could divorce the other without even having to inform the other of it.
Obviously, the solution was to abolish no fault divorce, but they were probably too hooked on being able to enjoy extramarital sex to bother with reforming the law as regards marriage.
It had to be left to Islam to make marriage a contract and divorce a breach of that marriage contract.
The fall of Rome has many reasons attributed to it. Constantine thought he could save Rome by converting to Christianity. I like to think he would have converted to Islam if he had had that option, but when Rome fell, Muhammad was not yet born.
1) Ban contraception except for married couples who have completed their families and registered prostitutes working in licensed brothels.
2) Shame sluts and slut-fuckers with quran.com/24/2
3) Punish sodomites with quran.com/4/16
4) Abolish gay marriage.
5) Abolish no fault divorce.
6) Stigmatise divorce.
7) Introduce the marriage contract to reintroduce fault into divorce as breach of contract.
8) Repeal all totalitarian thoughtcrime anti-discrimination legislation.
9) Narrow the franchise to taxpayers only.
10) Protect the right of the taxpayer not to pay more than a flat rate income tax of 20% to prevent the rise of a parasitic class.
11) Introduce humane slavery as an alternative form of welfare because hirers and owners of slaves have a duty to house and feed them.
12) Appoint Slave Visitors to see that government property ie slaves is not being damaged and also to see that the slave is working properly.
There will be an after sales service, so to speak, if things go wrong afterwards. It would be a bit like a sharia court deciding on the divorce settlement, which will be based on fault apportioned to the parties for its breakdown. Fault always starts at 50/50.
There will of course also be a Matrimonial Disputes Tribunal which I shall also set up. These will be a bit like a marriage counselling service with the express intention of discouraging a divorce and preventing family breakdown.
Sluts have turned Western men into MGTOWs and pre-MGTOWs.
MGTOWs if they could would rather not have anything to do with women at all and have sex with sexbots instead. MGTOWs who want children would pay a surrogate. Can you imagine what the human society would be like after just two generations of this? Yep, this is the road to perdition that feminism has embarked on.
When that finishes, keep it running to learn the full horror of MGTOW.
MGTOW BAD STUFF
Sandman:
"I want to be a part of the game changer which I think will be a combination of sex doll, oculus rift and filmed pornography. So with that being said I'm starting to research into the feasibility of building my own love doll with sensors in it that allows a man to interact with it while wearing an oculus rift headset. And have the actress respond with pre-recorded video footage when you touch the doll while wearing the headset. The sensors built into the doll will connect to the software and be interactive. I believe those three elements working together would be revolutionary. My academic background is in the development of new media technologies. That's what my degree is in and I'm glad that I can finally put that to some use. Isn't it ironic that I want to use ideas taught to me by feminist professors to spread feminism are now going to be used by me to liberate men. I want to call the system "The Liberator Doll." It's not just a doll but an interactive visual, physical and auditory experience. I want to install heaters in the unit to make it feel as warm as human flesh. I want it to have vagina sleeves that are not only easy to wash and maintain but also move and stimulate you better then the real thing. Think of it like taking your car through a car wash. Except in this case it would be a cock wash. The first step to making this happen is getting Oculus rift and making some content for it."
I propose a middle way: making it a requirement for those contemplating marriage to agree a marriage contract to abolish no fault divorce and repealing all totalitarian thoughtcrime feminist legislation viz The Equality Act 2010.
The children of Islamic State would mostly not be bastards, but Western nations left only with sluts mating with MGTOWs would have mostly bastards for the next generation, who will be even more bastard and slut with each subsequent generation.
Of the following, whose long term survival is more assured?
a) a society of mostly of bastards whose parents are SSMs (Slut Single Mothers) who are serially sexually abused by a string of their unfit mother's sexually abusive boyfriends (This social phenomenon together with free online porn and the morally rotten ideology of feminsm is the reason why most people in the West think there is a paedophile under every bush.)
or
b) a society whose parents are mostly married and whose children are mostly legitimate growing up with their married parents
MGTOW is the terminal cancer you suffer from. Islamic State are just your natural ideological enemies. You are therefore more likely to be killed by the terminal cancer you already have sooner than you are from the harm your natural enemies intend to do to you.
Court: "Have you, the complainant, previously had sex with your alleged rapist?"
Complainant: "Yes, but ... "
Court: "Right. 100 lashes each. Then come before me again if you have anything more you want done by the court."
024.002
YUSUFALI: The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication,- flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment.
PICKTHAL: The adulterer and the adulteress, scourge ye each one of them (with) a hundred stripes. And let not pity for the twain withhold you from obedience to Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day. And let a party of believers witness their punishment.
SHAKIR: (As for) the fornicatress and the fornicator, flog each of them, (giving) a hundred stripes, and let not pity for them detain you in the matter of obedience to Allah, if you believe in Allah and the last day, and let a party of believers witness their chastisement.
Can a wife to claim to be raped by her husband?
I would suggest the frequency of sex be stipulated in the marriage contract.
How many times a month? I think once a month should be the standard minimum. More often than the agreed number of times could be classified as unreasonable behaviour or possibly rape.
There is the question of whether they expire if unused or can be rolled over. If the husband goes away for a year, can he use all his 12 times up in one week, or will they be treated as expired? Is roll-over permitted? These are questions to be discussed and agreed by the parties to the marriage and their legal advisers.
I really must congratulate the LibDems on this excellent piece of propaganda. I will still be voting UKIP, however, even as they refuse to let me join their party for being an ex-BNP member and even as their leader remains a moral coward.
Of course, just because a particular UKIP donor says that the law against marital rape cannot logically exist because the whole point of marriage for a husband is to have sex with his wife, does not mean that UKIP wants now to abolish this offence.
My way of dealing with this question would be simply to require that a couple be legally required to agree a marriage contract before they can marry. The marriage contract would of course stipulate such terms as frequency of marital intercourse eg how many times a week/month/year, whether these rights can be rolled over or expire if unused within the time period in question etc.
A marriage contract would be an excellent means of enabling the court to apportion fault should the marriage break-up and fault can be measured by how much each party has failed to perform his or her part of the contract. Such a requirement would please lawyers licking their chops at the idea of the legal fees they will receive drafting these contracts as well as the litigation that would ensue when these contracts are breached.
It is just too bad for UKIP that they are too afraid of making me their Director of Communications and are leaving it to the very dull Paul O'Flynn who is not making much of an impact at all, as far as I can tell.
They had rules but could ignore them and make up new ones. They didn't have to have me in their party if they didn't want to, and that was that.
Probably, Farage thought that he was being clever by playing safe, but then people can just accuse you of racism anyway, whether Claire Khaw is a member of UKIP or not, as we have seen.
To attract even more support UKIP must be even bolder and more radical in its policies, and this means that they will have to propose the repeal of the Equality Act 2010 and the abolition of no fault divorce, thereby nailing its colours to an ideological mast of social conservatism.
Only then will UKIP get the support it needs, through polarising voters and creating clear blue water between it and all the other parties. However, knowing Farage, he will probably retreat because he doesn't like trouble and is tired of people being nasty to him.
Repealing the Equality Act 2010 would garner it the support of small businesses and independent traders that it so desperately needs.
Abolishing no fault divorce would be a genuinely radical proposal that would enrage feminists whose sole purpose is to undermine marriage and thereby undermine the patriarchy, and then complain that men are no longer men any more.
I am prepared to let bygones be bygones and help UKIP deal with its image problems with my ideas and arguments.
If anyone wants to ask me questions about how I can help UKIP, please do so at http://ask.fm/oneparty4all
When I am in power marriages are going to be arranged in the manner outlined below.
Stage 1 - Agreement of Marriage Contract
Once the marriage has been agreed in principle, your solicitor will:
Draft a contract after asking you to fill in a detailed questionnaire
Prepare and send out a package of legal information and a marriage contract
Liaise with all relevant parties eg parents, in-laws, etc and negotiate a date for ('completion').
Stage 2 - Exchange of contracts
Once contracts have been exchanged, your solicitor will:
Approve the terms of the contract and arrange for you to sign it.
It is short, sweet and strong as well as a compelling read. I must say I relish the thought of liberals reading this book and quaking in their boots, for they cannot refute any of the accusations Willinger makes with facts or logic.
As for British identity (which is currently Dipso, Fatso, Bingo, Tesco, ASBO and Paedo), it will change for the better when the right laws are in place.
The right laws, as far as I am concerned anyway, will be in place after the following take place:
1. after the repeal of the Equality Act 2010
2. after the repeal of the European Communities Act 1972
3. after the repeal of Murder (Abolition of Death Penalty) Act 1975
4. after fault is taken into account in any divorce settlement
5. after a flat rate income tax of 20% is in place
6. after the welfare-dependent and low-waged are disenfranchised
7. after the civil partnership and inheritance tax is abolished
8. after the welfare state is dismantled
9. after the NHS is broken up and sold off
10. after it is again shameful to have a child out of wedlock
The right laws would be the laws that undermine the foundations of the West's entrenched matriarchy that have made its government and people so venal, irrational and immoral. It would not be difficult at all to entirely discredit feminism as a viable, moral or intellectually respectable ideology when our voices are loud enough.
Generation Identity significantly increases the volume.
In May 1968, wildcat strikes across France initially sparked by student rebellions brought the entire nation of France to a standstill, with President de Gaulle going so far as to flee the country. The slogans of the ’68ers were a classic example of postmodern Marxism, a cry for a life more meaningful than what was possible under capitalist alienation. “A cop sleeps inside each one of us. We must kill him. Drive the cop out of your head.” “It is forbidden to forbid.” “Be realistic, ask the impossible.”
Though de Gaulle was able to defeat the would-be revolution, and his Center-Right party even gained seats in the elections that followed, May ’68 had a huge impact on European society, government, and culture. It heralded the establishment of Cultural Marxism [feminism, in other words] as the default culture of educated Western opinion. The rebellious young figures of the uprising, like the charismatic Daniel Marc Cohn-Bendit (aka “Danny the Red”), have gone on to become the boring old bureaucrats of the European Parliament, lecturing the people of Europe on what products they are allowed to use, what they are allowed to say, and what they are allowed to think. Instead of the beginning of a new era of freedom, May ’68 was the beginning of what Keith Preston has called “Totalitarian Humanism.”
I would set up debating societies in every London borough and promise to attend an event at each debating society at least once in my term. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_borough
I would set up a marriage bureau in every London borough to make it easier for decent Londoners of the marrying kind to meet each other.
I would London the first city in Britain to try out the Marriage Contract. (Lots of lovely legal fees for London lawyers!)
I would set up a marriage counselling service in every London borough to help those whose marriages have hit rocky patches.
I would set up a London Blind Date Association. Prospective husbands would make offers of marriage to prospective wives who would be wearing a niqab, but only after their questions have been answered to their satisfaction. These women would of course also have a list of questions for the men about their prospects, property and ambitions. It would be a bit like Blind Date but with the contestants wearing the niqab, even if they are not Muslim. This would be when deportment, wit, learning and personality would come into its own. Only when an offer has been made and accepted would the niqab be removed to reveal the features and the form of the woman concerned. As Mayoress of London I claim the right to be Mistress of Ceremony. It will be great fun, fellow Londoners!
