Translate

Showing posts with label Mary Beard. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mary Beard. Show all posts

Wednesday, 24 December 2014

The self-evident truth that feminism denies

Some things are easy for men but hard for women and vice versa. Most women are easily offended and find it hard to think logically, for example.

Most men find it easy to talk about sports and politics endlessly which would bore women silly.

If we acknowledge these differences, then we would have to acknowledge that men find it harder to say no to no-strings sex while women have more offers of sex than they would like to accept.

The problem with feminism is that it denies this self-evident truth, and uses all its legislative power to suppress the pointing out of this self-evident truth: that men are the weaker sex at saying no to no-strings sex.

For most women, sex is a chore while for most men it is a physical and all-consuming imperative.

If sex were a drug then men would be the user and women the dealer. The cancer of feminism is now so bone-deep that expecting the Western man to denounce feminism is like expecting a drug-addict to call the cops on his dealer. Ain't gonna happen.

And that is why Western civilisation is going down the toilet and just voting UKIP is not going to be enough because UKIP are too afraid even to acknowledge the elephant in the room.

What does the elephant in the room consist of?


  1. indiscriminate universal suffrage
  2. representative democracy when we should have a one-party state that protects the rights of its members operating under the principles of Secular Koranism http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html
  3. anti-discrimination legislation
  4. no-fault divorce
  5. gay marriage
  6. the civil partnership
  7. the consecration of our right to have extramarital sex (which is dysgenic) and the desecration of the institution of marriage (which is eugenic)
  8. the powerlessness of our politicians hence their despicable cowardice and hypocrisy
  9. the existence of the welfare state - another sacred cow - which supports all of the above making governments borrow recklessly to keep the whole shebang going

The operation of democracy prevents these tragic and continuing errors from being corrected and we are heading towards the edge of the cliff like lemmings.  

Please help me save Western civilisation by discussing this with any woman intelligent enough to understand this, even if you think she will disagree, become offended and never speak to you again.  

This would be your wife who will divorce you under the ruinous terms of no fault divorce, your daughter who will never speak to you again, and your slut girlfriend who will dump you, right?  

Ain't gonna happen, I know.

And that is why Western civilisation is going down the toilet.  

Any civilisation in which the overwhelming majority of men are afraid of women and husbands afraid of wives to even discuss politics cannot survive, let alone prosper. 

Can you imagine David Cameron, Ed Miliband and Nick Clegg discussing any of this with their wives? Or even Barack Obama?

I rest my case and my case is not based on a conspiracy theory. Men really are stupid and women really are crazy. Women are crazy because men become stupid the moment they say it is OK for women to be sluts, and women go crazy when they get the go ahead to be sluts.

We are all to blame if we do not work up the courage to confront the perniciousness of feminism.

Remember: once upon a time, a Wise Man created God to protect himself from feminism and his susceptibility to sluts.

When Aristotle said that the greatest injustice was to treat unequal things equally, he meant feminism would be the greatest injustice, and feminism is a cancer, waiting in the wings for its cue, for the right conditions to makes its entrance, to thrive and flourish. and then eventually kill its host ...

Athens did not become successful despite its alleged misogyny but because of it, but you won't hear classical historians like Mary Beard saying this, even if she agreed, cos she would be out of her job and out on her ear.

Feminazis have been victimising Camille Paglia for decades for speaking the truth.

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Camille_Paglia

Why Claire Khaw does what she does

Sunday, 24 August 2014

Ajmal Masroor's 3 steps to combating extremism in Britain

"First we need to inculcate the spirit of solidarity, togetherness and our unique identity, and that is we live in this country and it is our home," he said

He emphasised the need to tell young Muslims, that whatever their grievances that there was no justification for picking up the gun, and "that it cannot be done in the name of Islam".

Finally the government needed to be "more consistent with its foreign policy", not support dictatorships and encourage the spread of democracy in the Middle East.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/11052861/Three-steps-to-combating-Islamic-extremism-in-UK.html

On the first point, I think these men already know that they hold British nationality.

You cannot deny that the Koran commands Muslims to fight against those who oppress them.

[2:190] You may fight in the cause of GOD against those who attack you, but do not aggress. GOD does not love the aggressors.

[2:191] You may kill those who wage war against you, and you may evict them whence they evicted you. Oppression is worse than murder. Do not fight them at the Sacred Masjid, unless they attack you therein. If they attack you, you may kill them. This is the just retribution for those disbelievers.

[2:192] If they refrain, then GOD is Forgiver, Most Merciful.

[2:193] You may also fight them to eliminate oppression, and to worship GOD freely. If they refrain, you shall not aggress; aggression is permitted only against the aggressors.


Perhaps Ajmal will answer this question that I imagine an intelligent jihadist might ask him, if he were allowed the opportunity of asking it publicly and allowed to wait for the answer before he is taken away to be water-boarded:


"Why is Western democracy assumed to be good when it is Western democracies who bomb and invade Muslim countries, apparently at the behest of AIPAC and their military industrial complexes?"

Might Masroor support the making of a BBC documentary on A History of Antisemitism and pester whoever he needs to pester to make such a documentary? I don't mind presenting this, and, known for my judicious impartiality as well as not being an adherent of any of the Abrahamic faiths but wanting the best for Britain and Western civilisation, may well be a suitable person to do so. I promise also not to have annoying hair like the female historians Joann Fletcher or Mary Beard and trust the BBC will have competent make-up artists who will make me look my best and perhaps even put a style consultant at my disposal who will point me to the clothes of the best of British designers which will look most photogenic on me.

I will do my best to present this programme in the grandiose style of Lord Clark of Civilisation.

Mary Beard hair


Joann Fletcher hair



Claire Khaw hair

Lord Clark hair

Mao: To investigate a problem is to solve it.  

Thursday, 5 June 2014

Who should front BBC series Decline and Fall of Western Civilisation?

Should that ghastly woman Mary Beard be prevented from presenting the BBC series Civilisation?

How many minutes can you watch this before shuddering uncontrollably with disgust and irritation?  A male Facebook friend said: "I lasted 2 minutes - ghastly irritating woman".  




It is clear that Mary Beard is not fit even to clean Lord Clark's shoes let alone step into them.


Why do we need a remake of this excellent series anyway?  

What we really really need is is an analysis of what went so wrong with the BBC and its selection of TV historians since 1969 that the BBC licence fee payer is being caused alarm, anxiety and distress in 2014 at the thought of Mary Beard presenting this series as if she were a jolly hockey sticks schoolmarm and we her learning disabled charges.  

Wednesday, 4 June 2014

Spiteful censorious feminazi wants my account suspended because she did not like my answer about why men hate Mary Beard

http://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/jan/21/mary-beard-suffers-twitter-abuse


If Mary Beard deals with the question below properly I might have some respect for her:


Mary Beard: too ugly for TV and the agent provocateur of misogyny?
Is Mary Beard a red rag to misogynists? Is putting her about a tactic of the matriarchy to provoke men into making misogynistic comments for which they will be prosecuted and persecuted as a warning to other men who presume to criticise any woman for any reason at all?

Will someone buy this woman a haircut or do I have to do everything myself? I hope she will visit one of these hairdressers at http://fashion.telegraph.co.uk/beauty/news-features/TMG3340355/A-cut-above.html

Women should never play with their hair, even if they have beautiful hair.

If you played with your hair when you had beautiful hair, you will continue to play with your hair even after it has become really quite repulsive.

OMG.  I will probably find myself playing with my own hair now after saying this. I do hope Alexandra Swann doesn't play with her beautiful hair.

If your hair is beautiful enough, someone else will play with it.

The beautiful Alexandra Swann with her beautiful hair which I hope she does not play with. She is a bimbo with THREE DEGREES!  


Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...