From 47:00 Jemima Khan's marriage to the President of Pakistan is discussed

Unfortunately, the audio is terrible

Why the welfare state was necessary in Britain to avert revolution after WW2

Don't fight ruinous imperialistic wars and then feel you have to buy off returning soldiers with the welfare state to avert revolution.

Germany never had an empire so when Hitler failed to acquire Russia after losing the war, it wasn't that big a deal. When you have lost a war and Russian soldiers are raping your women, loss of a shoulda woulda coulda empire would be the furthest thing from your mind.

Britain had a world empire and lost it as a result of "winning" WW2.

It is only the most convoluted kind of doublethink and propaganda that persuaded the British that they had won WW2 after all.

As for WW1, what was that all about? Belgian neutrality, apparently. If WW2 was a continuation of WW1, then Britain lost its world empire in 1947 over Belgian neutrality guaranteed by the Treaty of London in 1839.

The Welfare State was more about averting revolution by buying off returning British soldiers who have had enough of dying like flies over the stupid wars
of their ruling classes.

The poppy is really a symbol of failed imperialism as well as an opiate to induce forgetfulness of all the reasons that led to two World Wars.

Does anyone know there was a General Election in 1915 that was cancelled?

The Parliament Act 1911 reduced the maximum life of a Parliament from seven years to five; however, the election that would have been due by 1915 as a result of the Act was not held due to the First World War (1914–1918).

Liberal Prime Minister Asquith thought that by starting and winning a short and successful war against the Germans in the summer of 1914 after which the boys would be home by Christmas, the Liberal Party would win the General Election of 1915.

Think about it: a world empire thrown away by a scummy priapic henpecked Prime Minister over an election that most people now are not even aware of, that would have taken place, but for the WW1.

Now the British are so hooked on the welfare that they would put up with uncontrolled immigration just to continue getting "free" stuff from it.

One bad decision leads to another until you end and your civilisation end up dead.

Time to take democracy out with the trash.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/11/poppy-mania-day-prevents-any-rational.html

The self-evident truth that feminism denies

Some things are easy for men but hard for women and vice versa. Most women are easily offended and find it hard to think logically, for example.

Most men find it easy to talk about sports and politics endlessly which would bore women silly.

If we acknowledge these differences, then we would have to acknowledge that men find it harder to say no to no-strings sex while women have more offers of sex than they would like to accept.

The problem with feminism is that it denies this self-evident truth, and uses all its legislative power to suppress the pointing out of this self-evident truth: that men are the weaker sex at saying no to no-strings sex.

For most women, sex is a chore while for most men it is a physical and all-consuming imperative.

If sex were a drug then men would be the user and women the dealer. The cancer of feminism is now so bone-deep that expecting the Western man to denounce feminism is like expecting a drug-addict to call the cops on his dealer. Ain't gonna happen.

And that is why Western civilisation is going down the toilet and just voting UKIP is not going to be enough because UKIP are too afraid even to acknowledge the elephant in the room.

What does the elephant in the room consist of?

1. indiscriminate universal suffrage
2. representative democracy when we should have a one-party state that protects the rights of its members operating under the principles of Secular Koranism http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html
3. anti-discrimination legislation
4. no-fault divorce
5. gay marriage
6. the civil partnership
7. the consecration of our right to have extramarital sex (which is dysgenic) and the desecration of the institution of marriage (which is eugenic)
8. the powerlessness of our politicians hence their despicable cowardice and hypocrisy
9. the existence of the welfare state - another sacred cow - which supports all of the above making governments borrow recklessly to keep the whole shebang going

The operation of democracy prevents these tragic and continuing errors from being corrected and we are heading towards the edge of the cliff like lemmings.  

Please help me save Western civilisation by discussing this with any woman intelligent enough to understand this, even if you think she will disagree, become offended and never speak to you again.  

This would be your wife who will divorce you under the ruinous terms of no fault divorce, your daughter who will never speak to you again, and your slut girlfriend who will dump you, right?  

Ain't gonna happen, I know.

And that is why Western civilisation is going down the toilet.  

Any civilisation in which the overwhelming majority of men are afraid of women and husbands afraid of wives to even discuss politics cannot survive, let alone prosper. 

Can you imagine David Cameron, Ed Miliband and Nick Clegg discussing any of this with their wives? Or even Barack Obama?

I rest my case and my case is not based on a conspiracy theory. Men really are stupid and women really are crazy. Women are crazy because men become stupid the moment they say it is OK for women to be sluts, and women go crazy when they get the go ahead to be sluts.

We are all to blame if we do not work up the courage to confront the perniciousness of feminism.

Remember: once upon a time, a Wise Man created God to protect himself from feminism and his susceptibility to sluts.

When Aristotle said that the greatest injustice was to treat unequal things equally, he meant feminism would be the greatest injustice, and feminism is a cancer, waiting in the wings for its cue, for the right conditions to makes its entrance, to thrive and flourish. and then eventually kill its host ...

Athens did not become successful despite its alleged misogyny but because of it, but you won't hear classical historians like Mary Beard saying this, even if she agreed, cos she would be out of her job and out on her ear.

Feminazis have been victimising Camille Paglia for decades for speaking the truth.

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Camille_Paglia

Why Claire Khaw does what she does

How to solve the problem of disability care

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30195857

@sima_kotecha @BBCr4today @StephenBubb It is time to prevent them from being born in the first place, surely.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 26, 2014

@ntfem @sima_kotecha @BBCr4today @StephenBubb hate crime being committed here. Why are you happy for UKIP to vilify the disabled?
— made in Grimethorpe (@kazjohnson) November 26, 2014

@kazjohnson @sima_kotecha @BBCr4today @StephenBubb It is a problem, and I am suggesting a solution. Are you trying to censor debate? @cpsuk
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 26, 2014

@kazjohnson @sima_kotecha @BBCr4today @StephenBubb Who is "happy for UKIP to vilify the disabled"?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 26, 2014

@kazjohnson If the welfare state were abolished then the mothers of disabled offspring would dispose of them themselves.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 26, 2014

@ntfem I agree. I am one of those mothers
— made in Grimethorpe (@kazjohnson) November 26, 2014

@kazjohnson Thank you for admitting this. So the solution is obvious. The welfare state is obviously dysgenic and shd be abolished pronto.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 26, 2014

@kazjohnson May I congratulate you on this unexpected admission. I am reminded of http://t.co/XOPOscBEKu
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 26, 2014

@kazjohnson The more women are honest with the mistakes they have made the sooner this country can solve its urgent and chronic problems.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 26, 2014

@kazjohnson Did you not just admit that you would have disposed of your disabled offspring too, like the woman in http://t.co/XOPOscBEKu?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 26, 2014

Terrorists 'use Down's syndrome suicide bombers' to kill 70 in Iraq
It seems terrorists have found a use for the learning disabled. Their audacity and ruthlessness is to be wondered at.

Al Qaeda use two Down's syndrome women to blow up 99 people in Baghdad markets

Handicapped boy who was made into a bomb

People with a learning disability are growing by up to 5% a year can require care and support costing a typical £1,500 a week

In what year will Britain be 100% learning disabled?

Feminazi Labour MP Jane Basham has reported my tweet

@Jane_Basham @KarenBUoM Slut-shaming and the abolition of the welfare state would be the cheapest, quickest and most effective answer.
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) June 24, 2014

@Jane_Basham Entirely predictable that a feminist and leftist would seek to censor free speech and rational discussion of important issues.
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) June 24, 2014

@Jane_Basham It is very interesting that a Labour MP should report me to Twitter for proposing political change. @Ed_Miliband @HackneyAbbott
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) June 24, 2014

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Is-feminism-dangerous-to-free-speech/221315967999943?fref=ts

Ed Miliband pussywhipped by Luciana Berger and forced to apologise
http://www.lucianaberger.com/2014/06/ed-milibands-statement-on-the-sun/

Feminazis in Labour destroyed Lord Glasman's career
http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/dan-hodges/2011/07/blue-labour-maurice-glasman

Let's face it, most men used to respect marriage ONLY BECAUSE it was the only respectable means of getting sex and having children.

Now that almost no one thinks it is necessary to marry before you have sex or children, marriage appears to have become redundant.

The more redundant marriage appears to be, the less likely it is to be respected, and more people will see it as stupid to respect it.

If most women are sluts and most mothers SSMs, then most children are bastards, and most men MCSFs or SPOSSMs.

SSM = Slut Single Mother https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379?fref=ts

MCSF =  Morally-Compromised Slut-Fucker

SPOSSM = Sex Partner of Slut Single Mother

MOBFOB = Mother of Bastard still living with Father of Bastard

FOBMOB = Father of Bastard still living with Mother of Bastard

You can imagine the morals and government of people who are mostly SSMs, MCSFs, SPOSSMs, MOBFOBs and FOBMOBs, can't you?

Since most people in Britain are as I described, it is not surprising that no political party in the land will support marriage.

What happens if we do not support marriage? It means the loss of parental and masculine authority, and fornicating sluts taking over, establishing their pornocratic matriarchy and turning your civilisation into SHIT.

What does it mean for men in the long term?
http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/understanding-the-role-of-the-drone-bee-in-a-hive.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1326168/Secret-footage-shows-millions-British-chicks-killed-year.html

Our government will just turn into the government of Jamaica where the percentage of SSMs was already 85% in 2007.

http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20070204/focus/focus2.html

The majority of Jamaicans clearly have no interest in the 'traditional' western married nuclear family lifestyle. Otherwise we would not have 85 per cent of babies born out of wedlock. 

So the West and its people and government are heading towards Jamaica, but will not enjoy its fine weather.

If male politicians fear to do the right thing because they already know most of their voters will punish them for it, and they are paralysed by the political imperative of only winning the next election, is there a fatal flaw in democracy that cannot be solved without correcting the grave and tragic error of indiscriminate universal suffrage?

Is the fatal flaw of democracy a government for sluts and bastards for sluts and bastards? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

Do people deserve the government they get?

Do politicians simply pander to the vices of their voters, fearing to give moral leadership because they know they will only be punished for it?

Are their manifestos nothing more than a list of bribes and promises they cannot keep?

Do politicians really know what is in the long term national interest it, or ever promote it?

Do feminists ever think of the national interest, or is it an alien concept for them?

Is feminism only about privileging women because they are women and nothing else?

Does feminism encourage women to be sluts and bribe men with cheap slut sex?

Are British men all the way up to the Prime Minister lower than sluts because they are terrified of offending them?

Are male politicians terrified of offending sluts because they are half their voters? (If most British women are sluts then most female voters are sluts.)

Do female MPs vote differently from male MPs?
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/if-you-hate-gay-marriage-blame-83-of.html

Should only taxpayers have the vote?
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ianmcowie/100010127/a-tax-based-alternative-to-the-alternative-vote/

Should bachelors be treated as second class citizens?
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/all-spossms-are-mcsfs-but-not-all-mcsfs.html

How chasing the female vote increased our taxes and the size of the state while reducing our liberties
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2010/10/case-for-disenfranchsing-women-or-why.html

Why not have a one-party state if it makes more sense?
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Why-not-have-a-one-party-state-if-it-makes-more-sense/353471931432677?fref=ts

Frank Field: "As debt levels soar, a national government [AKA one-party state] may be the only way we can pull through"
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/dec/08/government-debt-gilt-sales

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/thousands-of-mothers-have-multiple.html 

Why don't powerful men support men's rights?

http://ozconservative.blogspot.co.uk/2010/03/why-dont-powerful-men-support-mens.html


Because they

1. do not want to associate with victim men
2. think victim men are beyond contempt
3. think victim men probably deserve what they get for being limp-dicked sub-alphas and gutless whingers
4. think they or their friends could never become victim men and that this sort of thing only happens to other people
5. would not acknowledge their victimhood by whingeing about it even if they themselves really have been victims

These days only a female with the mind of a man can fight feminism.

A few tips for anti-feminist men:

• The term "feminazi" and "matriarchy" should be used to command the terns of discourse. Do NOT talk of yourselves as victims.
• Only when men have the courage to call themselves anti-feminist will the challenge to feminism really begin.
• The very idea of "victim men" is nauseating and repulsive. No wonder alpha males shun the very idea of helping sub-alpha victims in case their pariah status rubs off on them, like a kind of social leprosy.
• Men will never be able to compete with women in the field of victim status. The idea is repugnant anyway.
• Your best bet really is not to argue this point yourself but to hire me to do it.   Most anti-feminists are by definition sub-alphas and therefore bound to create the impression that they deserved whatever bad treatment they have suffered.   Mike Buchanan is a case in point.  View his performance at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkPCwvsYrjA  Definitely sub-alpha: sour, angry, short and rather  unattractive.  Women will not fancy him, especially if he is criticising feminism, and men just won't want to identify with him at any level.   I am more likely to charm and amuse people than a sub-alpha male victim of feminism. 
• Steve Moxon seems reasonably attractive but UKIP dumped him because he wrote something controversial about the Norwegian terrorist Anders Breivik in his blog.   http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-17911131  But perhaps his stripey jumper was reason enough.  Have a look at that https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwqTi6HN0pM&feature=endscreen

What do you have to ask for to destroy the matriarchy and feminism as a viable, rational and moral ideology?

1. The reintroduction of fault into divorce so the bitch cannot divorce you and take your house as soon as she is bored and irritated by you.   
2. The repeal of the Equality Act 2010 if you live in the UK or your country's equivalent of totalitarian thoughtcrime anti-discrimination employment legislation.   
3. The abolition of the welfare state.  (That should be easy because Western governments can no longer afford to the upkeep of this sacred cow anyway.)

The Unholy Trinity British atheists worship

‎"None of the mainstream parties want to admit the blindingly obvious fact that there is something very wrong with the NHS, as Stafford demonstrates in the most tragic and horrifying way. Labour can’t or won’t admit this, because it founded the NHS and claims it as its own. Likewise the Lib Dems are bound into this consensus. The Tories fear it would be electoral suicide to do something serious about it.

Nigel Lawson famously remarked that the NHS is the nearest thing we have these days to a state religion. Nobody can criticise a state religion. It’s much easier, and far more agreeable, to pretend that horse meat is the big story. Psychologists would call the events of the last week “transference”. And if British politicians (of all parties) carry on changing the subject, the more certain it is that there will be fresh Staffords to come."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9874234/Mid-Staffs-crisis-No-one-wants-to-talk-about-the-real-scandal-of-our-time.html

What is Peter Oborne hinting at?  What is it that he dos not quite dare say?  I believe it is as follows:

1. The Welfare State (including the NHS)
2. The Slut Single Mother who must not be offended (even by alpha male politicians) and all that she holds dear, including her disabled offspring with which she uses to wring more welfare benefits from the taxpayer
3. Sexual Liberation

It is the simplest matter to propose that all three be slain.  The reaction would be similar to what the boy in The Emperor’s New Clothes experienced.  It will be traumatic but ultimately rewarding and even satisfying.

Think of the three as the legs of a tripod.  Remove just one and the whole thing will collapse.  We should do it, because it is easiest thing in the world if we all say the same thing at the same time.  

Five forceful steps towards remoralising Britain

1.   Abolish the CSA and require men to maintain only the children of the women they are married to.

2.  Allow a man to reject a child, especially if it is disabled and unviable and if he can prove  it is not his. 

3.   Abolish child benefit and the welfare state. 

4.   Stigmatise the mothers of illegitimate children.

5.   Propose that SSMs be lashed 100 times.  (The Koran prescribes the lashing of adulterers/adulteresses, fornicators and fornicatresses.  I am not even going this far, but what is a Slut Single Mum but a fornicatress?   No further evidence is needed, surely, unless she is claiming it was an Immaculate Conception?  Anyway, Mary managed to get Joseph to marry her so Jesus was in fact legitimate.)

To return to rationally small government destroy feminism and reinstate family values

Feminism will never let men wean themselves off the welfare state.

Feminism wants to breast-feed the man she has infantilised, masturbate him and change his soild nappies until Western civilisation dies and rots.

How can feminism be defeated? Through the reintroduction of family values which would enable a rationally small state to exist.

How can family values be reintroduced?

Through IDEOLOGY and RELIGION.

Which religion is strong enough to defeat feminism?  Not Christianity, which is the religion of slaves and women.  In any case the Church of England is now hopelessly emasculated, infiltrated by women, gay priests, leftist clergy, liberals and third rate minds incapable of discussing morality intelligibly, who do not see it as their role to safeguard the morals of the British nation, and who in any case only associate morality with relativism and tolerance of evil and the celebration of sexual liberation, especially female promiscuity.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2146793/Cannes2012-Paradise-Love-European-women-sex-tourists-African-gigolos-Palme-dOr.html

It is they who tolerate all that is evil and shower their compassion on the criminal, the hopeless cases and the undeserving at the expense of the normal and healthy.  

There remains only one religion left.  Yes, the cure to feminism would appear to worse than the disease.  But is it really?  Can anything else be worse than the degradation and dementia that always accompanies feminism, the ideology that tolerates Slut Single Mums and makes men in the political establishment afraid of them, because so many of them now have the vote?

If Britain had been an Islamic state operating a system of direct democracy before WW2 Britain would not have lost its empire

Direct democracy is the only form of democracy worth discussing. That was the purest form of democracy as practised by the Ancient Greeks, and it is this version that the Koran recommends.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shura#cite_note-1

The Ancient Greeks voted on what laws to pass and what laws to repeal and whether to go to war.

Governments who consult the governed fare better than the rest because they can at least have a proper debate, take responsibility for whatever was decided and move on, while we cannot, because we feel abused, marginalised, ignored and betrayed.

Imagine, if the British had been asked about WW2, would Britain have lost its empire that was acquired with so much blood, sweat and tears by their ancestors?

But Churchill threw it all away because he wanted to be a war leader.

It was he who frittered away the inheritance of the British people.

When people like John Tyndall (who founded the BNP) complained with words to the effect after the war that Britain lost her empire for ignoble reasons and only gained the ignoble rewards of liberal decadence ie feminism, sexual licence, the emasculation and the disgusting feminisation of the white man and the uncontrolled immigration that would change the character of this nation forever, he was branded a Nazi and discredited by the liberal media.

After WW2 and after the loss of its empire, Britain could only comfort itself with the welfare state and the soft sweet luxuries of sexual liberation and easy divorce. But what did the welfare state that supported feminism and sexual licence do to the British ultimately?

The welfare state led to family breakdown, single parenthood, widespread illegitimacy, fatherlessness, ever lowering standards of education and morality, the worship of Mammon in the form of our sex and shopping society.

In short, the welfare state fueled by rampant consumerism created a culture of irresponsible borrowing and lending by government and individuals, the boom-bust cycle, all of which eventually led to the credit crunch affecting the entire Western world, who are now economically, morally bankrupt and heartily despised.

Perhaps it was ordained for the British to suffer the presence of Muslims, and to watch the people they regarded as a brown inferior race with a primitive religion surpass them in numbers, wealth and achievement in such a short space of time.

In the recent riots of England, whites joined in with the blacks to loot the shops of the browns, who are mostly the people these days who do any real business and who have property to protect.

It just shows you the strength and superiority of those who practise family values supported by marriage, compared to those once racially superior white affluent liberal atheists who thought they were above that sort of thing, but who are now effeminate reptiles and dogs, without honour and without shame, degraded and utterly contemptible in their cowardice and hypocrisy both in their domestic and foreign policy.

Imagine the kind of people who think the rest of the world is stupid enough to believe that they are invading another country for the good that country!   Their own people may be stupid enough to believe that, but it is sheer ignorance and arrogance to think others not subject to the British education system would be quite so susceptible to this sort of liberal claptrap.

Staggering, they will soon fall down on the pavement dead drunk, but not after vomiting and involuntarily defecating in the manner of drunks who really have had too much to drink, after all the partying they have had.  The rest of the world waits patiently, ready to kick their head in when this happens.

The lower the morals of women, the lower the morals of men.  And the morals of white working class slut, slag and slapper is very low indeed as they necessarily must be to have so many variously-fathered illegitimate children at the expense of the taxpayer in Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland.

Around half the children born in Britain are now born out of wedlock.

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23427447-more-than-half-of-all-british-babies-are-born-out-of-marriage.do

Think of how low the morals of the male political establishment must be, if they are afraid to criticise these sluts, slags and slappers who have variously-fathered bastards at the expense of the taxpayer.  It is no surprise that they do the things they now do in the world.  One can only hope that China and Russia eventually work up the courage to stop these fools and knaves in their tracks, with one neatly planted sucker punch, for the sake of world peace and to put an end to the toxic ideology of liberalism, which has delighted us for quite long enough.

Katharine Birbalsingh cannot bring herself to support selection and believes in the *con* that is academy and free schools

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00yrnwb/Newsnight_14_02_2011/

Neither will she condemn feminism, female promiscuity, family breakdown, single parenthood etc supported by the welfare state, which she dare not mention.  

In fact, her response was "no, not necessarily" [26:00] when she was asked if she saw selection a possible solution.

The poverty of expectation also discussed is reinforced by the welfare state, which we all know is the sacred cow the British worship currently pooing all over their carpet and eating them out of house and home.  Stupid, scared, skint Brits with their stupid, scared and skint government, all full of FUCKING SHIT.  


Nor does she mention the fact that no political party in government would wish to tackle the mess that is British education in a term of 5 years.  That is why we need responsible government under a one-party state that protects the rights of its members, but say that and watch the British CRAP THEMSELVES with fear. 

Waste of time then.

Why does she even bother if she is not prepared to go the whole hog?  She is just like all the other cowards and hypocrites.  Thus far and no further.  

Occupational fucking therapy, innit.  That is what these middle class campaigners do while they wretchedly wring their lily-white lily-livered hands.  Fucking liberal feminist welfarist shite all of them. 

Howard Flight is a pissy little limp-dicked fucking wanker who's afraid of cunty Cameron

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11837538

The Islamic Prohibition Against Usury Good for Britain?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2010/jul/17/malaysia-gold-dinar-thwart-capitalism



This would prevent bubbles and busts while making the world slow down. The fact that you cannot lend on interest means that you would only lend someone money for a joint enterprise that you believed in.

As for people who want to borrow money they don't have to buy things they don't need, they would be stopped dead in their tracks, and a good thing too.

Capitalism - the creation of desire for the sake of stimulating sales - is inherently wasteful.

What is wasteful is of course environmentally-unfriendly.

Because the state would be small under an Islamic economic system - top rate of income tax would be 20% - there will no culture of bail-outism.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums

No one will actually starve, because the rest of it would be made up through charitable giving to the needy and vulnerable. 

The culture of bail-outism comes of course from the welfare state, which artificially supports feminism. And we all know what women are like in their whingeing for more state handouts and more nannying legislation to bail them out when they have messed up their lives.


I therefore propose that this country:

1. Re-base the currency after the success of The Islamic Revolution of British Nationalism.

2. Draw a line under the disastrous decimal past by returning to Pounds Shillings and Pence.

3. Governments and individuals would be compelled into practising fiscal responsibility by the prohibition against usury, which is designed to prevent irresponsible lending and borrowing by government and individuals.

Sorted!

The addiction of the British to Welfare, Cheap Labour and Cheap Women

A nation that is addicted to welfare is also addicted to cheap foreign labour while being in denial of both. Those who point this out will have their motives traduced and be called "extremist", "insane", "Fascist" and "Nazi".

The welfare state while discouraging thrift, also encourages benefit scum mums to breed the next generation of benefit scum.

Suggesting and implementing the solution would be much like what would happen when you propose to take away the bottle of an aggressive drunk. The British Nation is this aggressive drunk.

What is civilisation?

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/7314/

Civilisation is when the good are strong.

That is the only objective meaning I can distil from this stubbornly nebulous concept of "civilisation".

Everyone, after all, imagines that they are civilised.

The West is no longer strong because it is no longer good. It is no longer good because it has forgotten its traditions of liberty that once made it strong.

For the West has been corrupted by his welfare state, which promotes fecklessness, promiscuity, and tolerance of societally damaging behaviour in the name of indiscriminate compassion and equality.

Bribed by the promise of social security for so many generations, the Westerner and his leaders have forgotten Benjamin Franklin's warning: "Those who prefer safety to liberty deserve neither."