Translate

Showing posts with label Nick Robinson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nick Robinson. Show all posts

Friday, 1 June 2018

Western democracy falters and looks to China



The China Model Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy

Friday, 15 July 2016

Brexit because people feel a great loss of control over their lives




George Bernard Shaw:

A healthy nation is as unconscious of its nationality as a healthy man is of his bones. But if you break a nation’s nationality it will think of nothing else but getting it set again.

What do we want?

A sense of national identity and a competent government run by an alpha male leader we believe to be looking after us rather than feminists, foreigners and LGBTs.

When do we want it?

We should have it a long long time ago. Is a May administration stuffed with Yes Women and emasculated Yes Men who are charisma free zones in awe of her going to get us this?

What do you think will happen as a result of this loss of control?

More importantly, what do you think of the calibre of this MP? He was a Brexiteer who supported that unreliable and flighty woman Andrea Leadsom who displayed her legs at every opportunity to her male supporters, thus destroying the chances of this country getting a Prime Minister who is both a Brexiteer and not a woman.

Male British politicians have so utterly lost control over the situation that more of them are prepared to support an unreliable woman rather than a competent and clever male politician because they are mesmerised by her legs and she reminds them of their mummy.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2016/07/the-41-male-tory-mps-who-let-may-in-by.html





What do you think having such weak male politicians will do?

It will further radicalise Muslims who are already disgusted by the degenerate and emasculated state of non-Muslim men and the egregiously low standards of sexual morality of non-Muslim women in Britain, of course. In short, a May Administration with a lesbian Education Secretary no less will only encourage and provoke our enemies.

Increasingly, radicalised Muslims will see it as their duty to take up the cudgels of exterminating the Amalekites that the Jews have given up on.

Who are the Amalekites?

I would suggest that Modern Amalekites are the peoples who do not abide by Noahide laws, even though rabbis claim that they have all died out. The Amalekites are an eternal metaphor for the ever present temptation of having low standards of sexual morality that ultimately produces a sexually degenerate matriarchy causing the decline and fall of your civilisation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2016/04/the-neanderthals-were-amalekites-god.html

Monday, 9 May 2016

Philip Hammond does not give examples of Britain turning its back on Europe and Nick Robinson did not press him

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/08/cameron-brexit-will-increase-risk-of-europe-descending-into-war/


http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b079mwss from 2:10

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_British_Army

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splendid_isolation



Friday, 21 November 2014

Mark Reckless photographed next to ex-BNP activist to whom Nick Griffin was alleged to have exposed himself






Chronology of Events leading to the Sunday Star story of a tumescent Nick Griffin "exposing himself"

What would happen to Nick Griffin and Claudia Dalgleish under Secular Koranism?

BNP leader Nick Griffin 'is a sex pest who exposed himself to former glamour model in her car'

Not a disaster for a politician or a celebrity or even a journalist who is often asked to have photographs taken with complete strangers and expected to oblige, I would have thought.

Below is poor Nick Robinson photographed next to an attractive Britain First lady.

Nick Robinson of the BBC photographed with the Britain First candidate, Jayda Fransen

One is immediately reminded of Jack Straw shaking hands with Robert Mugable. CHORTLE.






Tuesday, 23 September 2014

Why did YouTube remove the second installment of John Cantlie's critique of Western foreign policy?

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=15b_1411463830

The second part of John Cantlie's series of Lend Me Your Ears was removed from YouTube for apparently violating its terms and conditions. Really?

The reason given was "This video has been removed as a violation of YouTube's policy against spam, scams and commercially deceptive content."

British media reported that he was "reading from a script", but it doesn't look like it, does it?

What are the media trying to hide from you?

The conviction in his voice? The way he relished his words? How he seemed to be enjoying himself?

Yep.

World at One today could only talk about the legalities of airstrikes as you can hear at
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04hvxbh

You may think Kenneth O'Keele's point of view at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqD4f4tPXOg of interest to this debate.

They had ample time to analyse the video, but they chose only to mention it in passing, with no thought of their journalistic obligation to report or analyse the most interesting story of the day.

ISIS propaganda is now so effective that you cannot actually report it honestly without drawing attention to its effectiveness.

It is for this reason that I would unhesitatingly call it a tour de force, speaking as a propagandist myself.

Even as our media and government suppress it, people will wonder why it is being suppressed, don't they have a right to know etc etc and people will look into it even harder.

As I said, absolutely relentlessly chillingly effective, each installment even more visually and intellectually engaging than the next. They seem to have their very own Steven Spielberg or Josef Goebbels. (The side shots of Cantlie's face while he was speaking was a very nice touch indeed.)

So even if you hate them you have to admire them.

When you run out of lies, then all you are left with is the truth.

When you have run out of dark places to hide from the truth, the truth will shine on you so relentlessly that the lies you clothe yourself with will melt away, leaving you completely naked.

Democracy is now naked and all of our political establishment.

What is democracy but government by Western voters who don't know and don't care about foreign policy and who don't care what is being done in their name? What is democracy but lots of dumb Western voters happy to accept that Muslims want to destroy the West just because they are Muslims ? What is democracy but Western voters not getting why Muslims don't just have another drink and forget about their government's foreign policy like they do? 

And what is the truth?

The fact is that it was the fault of those who invaded Iraq for the current state of Iraq now.

They are the ones ultimately responsible for the mess, and they have run out of ideas, except more of the same.

"If all you do is all you ever did, then all you'll ever get is all you ever got."

In the meantime, it looks like ISIS are gaining more than Muslim supporters.

The Russians and Chinese must be secretly or not so secretly, cheering them on.

And yet the solution is so simple.

But  did it work when anyone told the Aztecs to stop their practice of human sacrifice assuring them that the sun will still rise again tomorrow?

Why didn't they listen?

Why wouldn't they listen?

Well, we all know what happened to the Aztecs.


http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/the-wests-sad-semi-war-against-isis-is-worse-than-useless/15793
Why the West's sad semi war against ISIS is worse than useless by Brendan O'Neill

The transcript is at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/transcript-of-john-cantiles-critique-of.html

Friday, 12 September 2014

In defence of Nick Robinson of the BBC

http://tompride.wordpress.com/2014/09/11/bbc-reporter-caught-red-handed-manipulating-video-in-scottish-indy-campaign/#comment-66566

There is a difference between answering a question properly and appearing to answer the question. If any of you think Alex Salmond answered the question properly or at all, then you will be able to tell me what he said when he said “Scottish voters should listen to me rather than men (both Scottish and English) who are responsible for billions of pounds of profit BECAUSE [fill in the blank IN YOUR OWN WORDS] ”

All of you who think Alex Salmond answered the question properly can of course fill in the blank and I invite you to do so.


http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/proposed-questions-for-scottish.html
Questions that should have been asked in the Scottish referendum

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/saving-scotties-from-shrek-military.html
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/how-to-save-scotties-from-shrek.html
Saving the Scotties from Shrek - the MILITARY option

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/how-english-conservatives-can-sort-out.html
My proposed constitutional settlement for the Scots, English and Welsh after this nonsense of Scottish Independence is finally put to bed


Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...