Translate

Showing posts with label Robert Mugabe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Robert Mugabe. Show all posts

Friday, 21 November 2014

Mark Reckless photographed next to ex-BNP activist to whom Nick Griffin was alleged to have exposed himself






Chronology of Events leading to the Sunday Star story of a tumescent Nick Griffin "exposing himself"

What would happen to Nick Griffin and Claudia Dalgleish under Secular Koranism?

BNP leader Nick Griffin 'is a sex pest who exposed himself to former glamour model in her car'

Not a disaster for a politician or a celebrity or even a journalist who is often asked to have photographs taken with complete strangers and expected to oblige, I would have thought.

Below is poor Nick Robinson photographed next to an attractive Britain First lady.

Nick Robinson of the BBC photographed with the Britain First candidate, Jayda Fransen

One is immediately reminded of Jack Straw shaking hands with Robert Mugable. CHORTLE.






Tuesday, 13 May 2014

What is happening to the English and Catholics?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/pope-francis-says-he-would-baptise-aliens-9360632.html
The Pope has forgotten about the Nicene Creed and the doctrine of the Trinity, it seems. Is he suffering from dementia?

Anyone can be a Catholic these days, even an alien from another planet, according to the supposedly infallible Pope. If I hear tomorrow that we now need a new Pope because someone has poisoned his tea, I would rejoice. I cannot help but feel sympathetic twinges of mortification and embarrassment on behalf of Catholics every time I hear that he has made some unCatholic pronouncement. What must Robert Mugabe, raised as a Catholic, think of the white man?  I shudder to think.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mN8AFwaN0rk&feature=youtu.be
Robin Tillbrook represents the modern Englishman. His eloquence and charisma have to be witnessed to be believed. Is he the very model of a modern Eurosceptic Englishman?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WW8vrbbwR2o&feature=youtu.be
English Democrats - 2014 Party Political Broadcast

This is what passes for Englishness these days. Do you, like me, wonder what is the average IQ of the English Democrats?  I suspect it is even lower than that of the BNP.  

Saturday, 3 May 2014

The grounds on which Max Clifford should appeal

William Blackstone:

"All presumptive evidence of felony should be admitted cautiously; for the law holds it better that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent party suffer."

The reason for this suddenly became clear to me after Max Clifford was found guilty.  While I think he probably did do it, I also wanted him to be found not guilty because I do not believe that any evidence adduced after such a lapse of time can ever be reliable enough to satisfy a criminal standard of proof.

While it is true that Clifford was arrogant and mocked his accusers playing the fool mimicking a television journalist behind his back, what he did does not call for an eight year sentence for a 71 year old man.  The term "cruel and unusual punishment" comes to mind.

If Clifford had been less arrogant or even obviously submissive, he might have got off.  So there we are: the British are now a people reduced to thinking it is all right only to give justice only to people they like, screw procedural fairness and the burden of proof. Nationalists gloating that a Labour supporter such as Clifford has now got his comeuppance should reflect on how popular nationalists and nationalism are to the average juror.

Am I the only one who thinks eight years for what he was alleged to have done so many years ago by so many women who wanted to get into showbiz (and we know what kind of women these tend to be) just a little excessive?

Also, it occurs to me that the sheer number of these allegations was reason enough to have these charges tried separately, or the barely schooled plebs on the jury would soon think in their barely schooled plebeian way that the number of these allegations was evidence itself of their veracity. Not everyone can be as consistently impartial and logical like me, after all. Not even my detractors would deny that I would probably be a senior member of the judiciary by now if I had taken all the necessary career turnings, and then be out on my ear like poor old Sir Paul Coleridge who dared to defend the only institution that would protect and maintain the patriarchy - marriage. That was why the matriarchy made him resign for daring to be so controversial as to promote - SHOCK HORROR - marriage. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2526180/Anger-judge-forced-resign-championing-marriage-Sir-Paul-Coleridge.html

In a matriarchy, the right to have extramarital sex is sacred while speaking in defence of marriage these days is concerned career-threatening blasphemy. This is the kind of country Britain has now become, suffering from homosexuality, gay marriage and dementia, as Robert Mugabe so delicately put it. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/how-i-brokered-a-peace-deal-with-robert-mugabe-roy-agyemang-reveals-the-delicate-diplomacy-needed-to-get-zimbabwes-president-to-sit-down-with-the-bbc-9268511.html

While it would have been obviously cheaper to throw all the charges at Clifford all at the same time, it is quite obvious that in a case like this, where the evidence can be so easily made up, and the number of women probably doing it for revenge and gain reckless with the truth these days so high, it is not safe for all the charges to be made one after another at the same trial, because it gives such a bad impression of the accused, especially when it is just one person's word against another.

I would have thought it was pretty obvious that the interests of justice would have required a separate trial for each allegation, especially allegations of this nature.

The way the judge went on about unproven allegations and treated them as if they had been was quite unpardonable.

Pertinent to count 3-6 is the evidence of what you did to a 12 year old girl
whilst she was on holiday in Puerto Cabopino. I am satisfied so that I am sure
on the evidence which the jury heard that this amounted to another sexual
offence against a young child. Had the offence not taken place abroad and at a
time when it was not justiciable here you would have been charged with
indecent assault in relation to it. 

23. This girl became a holiday friend of your daughter. Having groomed her by
playing a tickling game with her in the swimming pool, you got her parents’
permission to take her to a Jacuzzi in the hotel complex. 

24. Whilst your daughter was absent and you were in the Jacuzzi with the 12 year
old you put your hand down her bikini and onto her pubic mound and asked if
she was ticklish there. You then got hold of her hand and moved it onto your
erect penis and started moving her hand up and down quite slowly. You
stopped when your daughter came to the Jacuzzi

http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Judgments/sentencing-remarks-hhj-leonard-r-v-clifford.pdf

Interestingly, nowhere has it been said that Clifford has been found guilty of this.

http://ukcriminallawblog.com/2014/05/02/max-clifford-sentenced/

Mr Clifford was sentenced as follows (date and age of victim in brackets) :

Count 3 – (aged 15, in 1977/78) – 12 months
Count 4 – (aged 15, in 1977/78) – 18 months, consecutive
Count 5 – (aged 15, in 1977/78) – 24 months, consecutive
Count 6 – (aged 15, in 1977/78) – 24 months, concurrent
Count 8 – (aged 19, in 1981/82) – 6 months, consecutive
Count 9 – (aged 16 or 17, in 1980′s) – 6 months, concurrent
Count 10 – (aged 16 or 17, in 1980′s) – 21 months, consecutive
Count 11 – (aged 18, in 1984/85) – 15 months, consecutive

The individual sentences are not far off what we had predicted, but the total is, as we said, double what we had predicted.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2618575/Victims-fury-stars-backed-untouchable-Clifford-predator-jailed-eight-years.html#ixzz30r5y8g3s

The judge also said he believed the accounts of six women whom Clifford was not charged over but who were prosecution supporting witnesses at his trial.

Their ‘compelling evidence’ included how Clifford sexually abused a 12-year-old girl in a Jacuzzi during a family holiday in Spain in 1983.

Note that Clifford has not been found guilty of sexually abusing the 12 year old girl.  Yet this "evidence" was deemed to be "compelling" enough to convict him of the other charges.

Surely shome mistake?  It really does sound like Judge Leonard has got his judicial knickers in a twist over that.

It is to be hoped that what I have said will furnish grounds for appeal for poor old Maxie, but if not I shall be happy to visit him in prison to cheer him up and give him opportunities of proposing to me.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/some-views-on-conviction-of-max-clifford.html

He may want a new wife soon and I think I could deal with a husband who is mostly away with no danger of unreasonable sexual demands being made upon me.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/why-would-any-englishman-want-to-marry.html

Wednesday, 23 April 2014

Claire Khaw, ethnographer of the BNP, has diagnosed the cause of British malaise: bastardy

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006qy05/features/ethnography

The Thinking Allowed Award for Ethnography

Thinking Allowed in association with the British Sociological Association announces a new annual award for a study that has made a significant contribution to ethnography: the in-depth analysis of the everyday life of a culture or sub-culture.
**Entries are now closed for this award, the winning entry will be announced in April 2014**
Are you involved in social science research and completing or will have completed an ethnography this year? The Award is open to any UK resident currently employed as a teacher or researcher or studying as a postgraduate in a UK institution of higher education.
An entry should be a completed ethnography, a qualitative research project which provides a detailed description of the practices of a group or culture. Any sole authored book or peer reviewed research article published during the calendar year of the award will be eligible.
The judges for the Award are Professor Dick Hobbs, Professor Henrietta Moore, Dr Louise Westmarland, Professor Bev Skeggs. The Chair is Professor Laurie Taylor. (Please do not contact any judges directly).
The judges will be looking for work which displays flairoriginality and clarity, alongside sound methodology. The work should make a significant contribution to knowledge and understanding in the relevant area of research.
The panel of judges will select six finalists, and from that shortlist the judges will select an overall winner who will be awarded a prize of £1000.
The winner of the Award will be announced at the BSA Annual Conference in April 2014.


Damn it, I wish I had known about it before.  BNP supporters and the British would have been my subject.

Why are they the way they are?  Cos they are poor and plebeian and everyone expects the poor and plebeian to suffer.  People might care for them if they were fit for purpose.  Being working class they should be fit for the purpose of work but they are not.  They cannot compete with the immigrant worker even in the field of unskilled manual work.

The BNP consist mostly of beta males and because no one finds them sexy or marriageable, nobody cares what happens to them including their women who prefer to marry Muslims and other races just to get a better quality male partner.  Their women - who are mostly SSMs - another sub-species I have been studying at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379?fref=ts - control them.  Beta males under the thumb of omega females do not engender respect, merely disgust and revulsion by members of more patriarchal societies.

They only go on about Muslim grooming but never question why there are so many white girls who are the ready victims of Muslim sex predators. This is because they would have to question the morals of their mothers who are SSMs and SSMs are the only kind of women they have any dealings with.  If they offended SSMs they would get no nookie, which is why they stay quiet.

But if they did start blaming the morals of their women then something might happen in the way of a political discussion, but these moral retards would rather have regular sex than risk saying anything that might threaten their supply of slut sex.

These men are called MCSFs - short for Morally-Compromised Slut-Fuckers.

Most British men are MCSFs, most British women are sluts, most British mothers are SSMs, and most British children are bastards.

No BNP supporter will explicitly support marriage because they are all sexually compromised MCSFs.

They will not discuss what it means to respect marriage because they know they will have to end up agreeing with me that to properly respect marriage one must logically prohibit extramarital sex, and this would mean that their supply of cheap slut sex would be threatened.  Since they are all atheists and do not believe in an afterlife of 72 virgins, they feel they must take their pleasures where they find them.

Because these men either have no offspring or have lost touch with them they do not particularly care what happens to their offspring after they die.

What the BNP is the rest of Britain will become: a demented matriarchy.

Robert Mugabe said.


"There appears to be a kind of overall dementia affecting the minds of the West.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/how-i-brokered-a-peace-deal-with-robert-mugabe-roy-agyemang-reveals-the-delicate-diplomacy-needed-to-get-zimbabwes-president-to-sit-down-with-the-bbc-9268511.html

This is because most British mothers are SSMs.  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14513517 The whites have become black

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/the-sideshow/researchers-western-iqs-dropped-14-points-over-last-180634194.html  Sluts make the next generation stupid.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1299400/Fathers-sleazy-mothers-lazy-What-au-pair-REALLY-thinks-you.html  British parents bad parents

http://uk.reuters.com/article/2007/11/12/uk-britain-motto-idUKL1256515520071112
Today's Britain: dipso, fatso, bingo, asbo, Tesco and not forgetting PAEDO ...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/leaguetables/10488555/OECD-education-report-subject-results-in-full.html
British getting stupider and stupider

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/in-what-year-will-britain-be-100.html
British people with a learning disability are increasing in number by 5% a year.
In what year will Britain be 100% learning disabled?

Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain.  

Sunday, 6 March 2011

My advice to Katharine Birbalsingh about what she should do next: move to Zimbabwe

Katharine Birbalsingh in a fetching dress, next to Toby Young

http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/mar/05/katharibne-birbalsingh-tory-teacher-aladin

http://ncr-london.eventbrite.com/#ty

3 March 2010

A waste of time really, as it was the regurgitation of all the complaints we have heard so many times already. British education is an international scandal.  It is a dreadful waste of so much talent because the liberal and feminist teaching profession is against traditional values, traditional teaching and are brainwashed at teacher training college to be Communists believing in free love and the tolerance of everything that is intolerable in any decent society with a decent future.   

The format of the discussion merely provided everyone to say their piece and to feel important, briefly, until their speech was over.

Katharine's dress was very fetching, and probably inappropriate for an evening meant to be spent discussing the depressing subject of British education. 

Perhaps the idea was not really to propose a solution, but to give everyone a chance to air their grievance and dismiss the concerns of others as the egregious, progressive and arrogant Donald Clark did.  Equality of failure was what that fucking Commie shithead promoted and defended, and anyone who wants different for their children should be taken out shot, was that the gist of what he was saying, I seem to remember.  He had nothing but undisguised contempt for the traditionalists such as Toby Young and the Headmaster of Winchester College who wanted this thing called "High Culture" as opposed to the BTec.

However, even if Katharine's Fairy Godmother had been there, she would not have been able to help, because nothing was being proposed.  Discipline in class was a bit of a topic, but nothing was said about how one was to go about imposing it.

One must not be afraid to ask for things.  Indeed, asking the right question is crucially important to the solution of a problem, but the question "how are we to get what we want?" was never at any time asked by anyone there that night. 

Recently, Katharine and I were Facebook friends.  She blocked me when I became a little too persistent about wishing to discuss with her a teaching profession corrupted and infested by feminism and liberalism.   She absolutely refused to engage point blank or even acknowledge that the question has been asked. 

I had suggested that single mothers badly parenting their children was the main cause for the need to dumb down, but it was not a subject she was prepared to discuss with me at all, probably because she could not see herself saying anything like that in public.  Doubtless her female friends are rather like mine, in the sense that every other female friend is a single mother.  For Katharine, to criticise single mothers publicly would be tantamount to sending herself into coventry, where she does not wish to be.

The long and short of it is this: everyone knew nothing was going to be done.  The event was so Katharine could sell her book, look pretty and perhaps attract a nice husband who will take her away from all this unpleasantness.

Nothing was going to be done because a five year term ain't gonna be long enough for any government to sort out this mess.  Therefore it suits them all to pretend something is being done until they are out of office.  Such is the corruption of British politicians and its teaching establishment.

This problem is of course one of the reasons why I concluded that only a one-party state will save this country from descending into even steeper and more precipitate decline.  Something needs to be done and done now, before most of the British forget how to read and write and lapse back into painting themselves blue and becoming the barbarians they once were.

But no one will listen.

To Miss With Love sold a few copies and that was the purpose of the exercise.  Perhaps Katharine should go to Zimbabwe where education is in fact valued, whose people are so wonderfully well-educated, civil, charming and motivated, or perhaps just the ones I met in London.  I was told by a proud Zimbabwean that not only are they well-educated, they are intellectually very competitive.  Robert Mugabe himself had acquired seven degrees, ie the Real Thing through self-study (and none of them honorary).  Mugabe genuinely understood the value of education, unlike the lazy, stupid, cowardly British  whom my Zimbabwean acquaintance had he said had "dumbed down a bit".  I was under the impression that this young man means to make his fortune in London precisely because he thinks the  the natives are ripe for exploitation and quite simply unable to compete because they have not learnt the 3 Rs or absorbed any of the principles of hard work, good manners, respect for one's elders and all the other qualities that rational governments would seek to instill in its people to make them fit for the world of work. 

I was told about the A, B and C schools in Zimbabwe by this acquaintance.  That classification will doubtless not catch on in Britain because the female and liberal-dominated educational establishment doesn't want to acknowledge that there are winners and losers in life, and prefer to remain in cloud cuckoo land even as the  sky falls in on them. 

I wish her well anyway, because I understand the prevalence of cowardice, dishonesty and hypocrisy in British life.  Those who appear to be busily fighting the system seem like good enough people, until you realise that they are not in fact quite good enough to win.

Friday, 5 March 2010

The Genius and Revenge of Robert Mugabe

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/zimbabwe/7370383/Robert-Mugabe-gives-David-Cameron-election-backing.html

Robert Mugabe gives David Cameron election backing?

Robert Mugabe gives David Cameron the kiss of death.

Ruin it for all the hated British political parties! Mugabe is a genius really, even if you hate him and know that he hates the British.

Mugabe:

"Give the f*ckers a hung Parliament which would ruin their currency and economy, watch them become like Zimbabwe, but with a lower standard of education .......

MWAHAHAHAHAHA!"

Thursday, 1 October 2009

Zimbabweans better-educated than Britons

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Inclusive+education+in+Zimbabwe:+policy,+curriculum,+practice,...-a0168163364


I am thinking of emigrating to Zimbabwe because I think this country is going to the dogs.

Have you noticed how well-educated Zimbabweans, both black and white, are?

Robert Mugabe's education system is better than Gordon Brown's education system. Zimbabwe has one of the highest literacy rates in the world. 90% according to UNICEF in 2006.

They even have this very modern and clever thing which the most powerful nation in the world has: a one-party state. No doubt the Chinese suggested this, and they were not too proud to try it out. It would appear that things have improved for the average Zimbabwean too.

Robert Mugabe is a much more amusing and charming leader than Brown - full of memorable soundbites and impish mischief. Even while he insults the West one cannot help but smile indulgently at him, because he is so entertainingly rude.

"I do not have a problem with the British people, only with Number Ten," he said, with a twinkle in his eye.

I, at any rate, cannot help liking him a little bit, and admiring his media savvy which is equal if not actually superior to Lord Mandelson's ...

Perhaps a Robert Mugabe Leadership and Charm School could be established and Gordon Brown be his first student?

Friendships: places of wisdom or echo chambers?

11:01 AM @teestrypzSOG ​#1 ​Wagwan Marc 11:02 AM @MarcInTbilisi ​​wagwan? 11:02 AM @βρεττς ​​I think if you talk honestly and can receive it...