Slavoj Zizek "The Sublime Object of Ideology"

36:00  I have always thought Zizek was a right-wing philosopher mocking the left by pretending to be one of them through speaking their language.

39:00  The Jew has greater intelligence, but is he really wiser than the gentile?

44:00 Once the laws of God are in place, belief will follow.

The more you believe in the afterlife, the more you are prepared to act on your religious principles.

No amount of philosophising is going to make a coward brave.

This explains why religions last so much longer than man-made secular political ideologies.

18:00  Buddhism - an atheist philosophy - is lame because it assumes that we will all be reincarnated according to how good or evil we were in this life without explaining who administers this process.

31:00  We fall in love when we desire to fall in love and a person that appears to fit the bill rolls up.
White Sharia came after Secular Koranism (2009). One day, Western Woman will thank me for conceiving of Secular Koranism, because White Sharia is really what white men would like to do to white women if they could, and Secular Koranism protects them from this horror.

47:00  Slave morality - this could be expressed as whether the ends justify the means.

49:00 "Sovereignty is necessarily a bloodbath." Feminists don't get this though because they are spoilt child-like creatures in denial.

54:00  No government, no law. Only God can be above emperors and outlast governments or dynasties.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandate_of_Heaven

Why even atheists need the Hypothetical Supreme Authority that is the Abrahamic God to settle their disputes
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2020/04/why-even-atheists-need-hypothetical.html

Why Breivik and Western politicians are pro-Israel even though they dislike Jews

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/08/anders-behring-breivik-pim-fortuyn


How disgusting that a philosopher who wishes to declare Breivik sane has to resort to this kind of impenetrable prose.

Zizek is a fraud anyway, though a clever and comedic one who has mastered the impenetrable prose Western philosophers like to inflict on the world.  He is really a right-wing philosopher pretending to be a left-wing philosopher because to call himself a right-wing philosopher would involve a certain sacrifice in status and income.

Why did Zizek go on and on and on about the Jews anyway?

It is clear to me that Breivik was pro-Israel because he hated Muslims and wanted Jews to continue kicking the shit out of Muslims whom he hated and feared and didn't want in his country.

Isn't that how the white atheist EDL member thinks anyway?

Israel represents the power of the West for it is a colonial outpost of the West surrounded by hostile Arab nations as an affront to Arab nationalism.

Israel represents to the West its former power when it was able to do this sort of thing  at will to subject peoples, when it was able to indulge in exercises of gunboat diplomacy.

It is not out of love for the Jew that the European gentile wishes to preserve Israel, but out of a nostalgia for a golden age of the White Man when he could invade and annex the lands of subject peoples at will.

The modern European gentile is not even Christian or religious, and wouldn't dream of ever visiting the Holy Land. He clings to Israel because he regards it as a family heirloom reminding him of the glory days of his ancestors, whose wealth and knowledge he knows he has already frittered away through his decades-long orgiastic self-indulgence of wine, women and song.  Israel is yet another Sacred Cow of the European male together with Feminism, Free Love and the dysgenic Welfare State.

Slavoj Zizek is a philosopher of the RIGHT pretending to be a Marxist

ALL THE BEST MARXIST ANALYSES ARE ALWAYS ANALYSES OF A FAILURE

The idea that all the best Marxist analyses have traditionally been analyses of failure appears in an interview with Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Zizek given in 2008. In this interview, Zizek was asked about the events in Czechoslovakia in 1968, when a period of reform, aimed at decentralising and democratising the country, was brutally brought to an end by the Soviet Union and its allies. 

Zizeks' claim is that the crushing of the reforms became the very thing that later sustained a myth held by the political left - namely that, had the reforms gone ahead, some kind of social and political paradise would have followed. According to Zizek, those on the political left are prone to dwelling on their failures, because doing so allows myths to be generated about what would happened if they had succeeded. Zizek says that these failures allow those on the left to maintain a "safe moralistic position", because their failures mean that they are never seen in power, or truly tested by action. He describes this stance as the "comfortable position of resistance", which allows an avoidance of the real issues - such as re-evaluating the nature of political revolution. For Zizek, a dedicated Marxist [sic], serious questions about the nature of political power are obscured by endlessly trying to justify utopia's elusiveness.

From THE PHILOSOPHY BOOK

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Philosophy-Book-DK/dp/1405353295

How else can he speak the Truth and make me love him if he is just a ponce of a Left Liberal Wank Piss Marxist Philosopher?

I have exposed this man for fooling the fools who will unquestioningly accept that black is white if that is what the label says.

I do hope his employment prospects have not suffered as a result of this revelation.   I would be happy to give this man shelter from the storm and offer him my bosom for him to rest his head on.  

A philosophical offer Slavoj Zizek should not refuse

Dear Dr Zizek

A PHILOSOPHICAL OFFER YOU SHOULD NOT REFUSE

I have a theory that you would probably do better as a comedian than a philosopher because so much of what you say is so excellently funny.  I have myself done a bit of stand-up comedy myself in my time, but it is harder to be funny and remember all your lines than just to talk for about an hour about your favourite subject to a captive audience, so I understand.   

Having admired you greatly for a few days, I have decided that I would like to interview you during which I shall seriously consider whether or not I will offer myself to you, should you find me sufficiently attractive.

I have this theory that no man resist sex from a woman, provided she is not actually repulsive or obviously diseased.  

I would also like you to answer a few questions, before or after sex, as you wish.

These questions will centre around the question of the mislabelling of you as a philosopher of the Left when you are in fact a philosopher of the Right.  I regard myself as a philosopher of the Right since I am currently promoting  the idea of the one-party state for Britain.  This would make me a National Socialist, I believe, or perhaps even a Communist, in the Chinese sense of the term.

I will be giving a talk on the subject of consciousness and why this question is important to take place on 16 November 2011 in Kingston on Thames.  Details at http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=208329229203126

In this talk I intend to demonstrate why Western philosophy is a complete waste of time.   

I do hope you will be able to attend.  If you are looking for overnight accommodation, I may be able to help you should I not find you actually repulsive in person.   

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/

http://twitter.com/#!/1party4all

http://www.1party4all.co.uk/Default.aspx

are links that should give you a flavour of what I am about.   I should also mention that I was expelled from the BNP in July for things said on the Victoria Derbyshire Show that was found offensive by the disabled and their single mum.  The transcript of what I said is at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/07/transcript-of-what-i-said-on-victoria.html

I would very much like to know if you approve of their decision from a philosophical point of view.  

If you do not love me already and want to have sex with me right this very moment, I hope I shall have the opportunity of persuading you in person, subject to my not finding you actually repulsive.  

To assist you in deciding whether you would like to accept my offer of no-strings sex, you could friend me on Facebook and meet all my friends who want me to meet you too.   

Yours philosophically

Claire Khaw