"Support our troops" = send more of them to die for Blair, Brown, Cameron, Clegg, Bush, Obama, Israel and the whole Neo-Conning shebang ...

http://news.yahoo.com/six-uk-soldiers-believed-dead-afghan-explosion-090931109.html


What do these people who "support our troops" mean? Send more of them to die?

If they wanted to discourage them they should join Anjem Choudary in his demonstrations when he tells British soldiers that their efforts are not appreciated and that they are dying only to incur the hatred of Muslims and right-thinking members of the international community.

That would make more sense than waiting for them to die in Afghanistan so they can show their "support" by turning up in morbid mawkish crowds so they can start crying and having hysterics when coffins are driven past Wootton Bassett - a truly DISGUSTING practice the photographs of which can be seen at

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1248845/Wootton-Bassett-unites-grief-soldiers-bodies-return.html

Talk about giving succour to the enemy, eh?   A bunch of British pussies having a good cry, like the bunch of women they now are, and enjoying the experience.

This is what you are dying for, you bunch of fucking SUCKERS.

If they were half the men they ought to be they would MUTINY.   Too bad I ain't in Helmand myself., or the British public would be treated to a different kind of a story and be preparing for a military coup, as I bring the boys back to sort out a few things back home so I can give Westminster a bit of a spring clean ....

Would it really be treasonous to storm Parliament during PMQ and take out the whole lot of them if you were leading a military coup?

It you called elections immediately afterwards, we would still be a democracy, wouldn't we?

Is it treason to rescue the Monarch from elected politicians who are misgoverning Her country, and actively colluding in the deaths of Her subjects for WHAT?  The Neo-Conning political clases can NEVER explain this adequately or coherently.

The honourable hard-working ones - John Baron MP, Peter Bone and Frank Field come to mind - will be warned to stay away from PMQ on the day.

As for the BBC lot, the ones who don't feel they can work with the new regime would leave the building before the military dictator drops in on them after his spring clean of the Commons.

The post Cameron Commons would operate as if Peter Bone MP's House of Commons Disqualification Bill were in force.

http://conservativehome.blogs.com/parliament/2010/10/peter-bone-seeks-to-abolish-the-flatterers-cajolers-and-sometime-bullies-that-are-the-party-whips.htm

It is such a cheering scenario: the corpses of Cameron, May, Hague, Clegg, Maude being dragged out of the Commons in a trail of blood by the soldiers who would otherwise have been blown up in Afghanistan ....

I really hope that some enterprising Lieutenant Colonel will give this idea his serious consideration.

Asghar Bukhari of MPAC defriends me for saying Muslims MUST and SHOULD continue to protest offensively against the war

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asghar_Bukhari

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Public_Affairs_Committee_UK

Asghar Bukhari has defriended me on Facebook because I said that anti-war protests must necessarily be offensive to work and that Muslims Against Crusaders  were doing a good job really.  No pain, no gain and all that.  

I suggested that MAC would do better for themselves if they pretended they cared about white working class British soldiers being sent to Afghanistan to die for Israel, Bush, Blair, Brown and Cameron and all the warmongering MPs who voted to invade Iraq and Afghanistan.  Instead of the MAC calling British soldiers murderers, rapists etc who deserve to roast in hell, they should instead express their deep concern that these soldiers are dying for a lost and dishonorable cause which is in any case against the British National Interest and invite the BNP to join them in protesting against the war. 

It could be pointed out to the Wootton Bassetters by MAC in slightly more emollient tones that dying in a dishonorable and disgraceful unwinnable war is far far worse than converting to Islam in prison after having been court martialled for mutinying.. 



Asghar response was:

"Claire what are you on about? If you think that faking it is the best wat forward you have serious problems."

and then he defriended me without waiting for an answer. 

I just wonder what's so wrong about that though.

Understandably Muslims are nervous about being hated even more than they are already, but if the war carries on and the MAC carry on the way they have been doing, the hatred against Muslims would rage more ferociously anyway. 

It does seem that Roshanara Choudhry (is she any relation of Anjem's, I wonder?) has probably done us all a favour by stabbing Stephen Timms.  If more of them are stabbed, this would make it more likely for for MPs who voted for the war at


http://www.naba.org.uk/CONTENT/TheAssociation/Parliament/MPs_Vote_War_on_Iraq.pdf

to express remorse, regret and recant, like Clare Short.

Once enough of them do - whether out of genuine remorse or because they fear for their lives - our boys will be home sooner with less loss of life.  Once the war ends, there will be no more Wootton Bassett coffin drive-bys for the MAC to attend in order to provoke the local populace, and Muslims will not be quite so hated. 

Will someone please tell me exactly what is wrong with this piece reasoning?

Sometimes you have to keep pushing at something until it gives.  Half measures are just a waste of time.

What the Prophet Muhammad might have done if he were Anjem Choudary

I like to imagine that the Prophet Muhammad if he were alive and living in this country would turn up at Wootton Bassett and express sympathy and sorrow at the unnecessary deaths of the white working classes who are cannon fodder to the dishonourable and disastrous war that even the nitwit NeoCons now wish they hadn't started.

He might have made a speech suggesting that those who are still alive with the full number of limbs they were born with should consider going AWOL if they are about to be sent to Afghanistan and feeling uneasy about the war, and he might have suggested that those already there mutiny and down tools.

He might have suggested that the parents of soldiers still alive and not wishing to attend the funeral of their children persuade their children to do the same.

The penalty for going AWOL and mutiny is a court martial and 3 years' imprisonment, I think, but at least after that you would be alive, and still have the full number of limbs you were born with.

What would the Prophet Muhammad himself do is always a good question to ask oneself or suggest that the Muslims ask themselves, I would have thought.

Gloating about the banning of Al Muhajiroun?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/jan/10/david-mitchell-free-speech

Next time you propose a march that enough people find "offensive", and agree that terrorists might be angry with us because of our foreign policy of invading people's countries on the pretence that they have WMDs and may harbour terrorists, you could find your organisation banned.

Did we invade Eire to kill the IRA? Why not?

I propose the BNP now take the initiative and hold a mock funeral with empty coffins:

Coffin 1 - Freedom of Speech (Can't say "gollywog" now can we?)

Coffin 2 - Freedom of Belief (that British foreign policy encourages terrorism, anything that offends PC ideology and those who are against an Islamic state)

Coffin 3 - Freedom of Contract (all anti-discrimination legislation)

Coffin 4 - Freedom of Association (BNP, Jewish Free School judgment that said Orthodox Jews racist and/or sexist)

Coffin 5 - the right to property (high taxes infringe this)

It would be nice if the BNP could summon up the courage to invite Anjem Choudary and hold it in Wootton Bassett for maximum publicity.

Perhaps they will end up being banned. And then what will we do?

Civil disorder would be an option, but this is unlikely in a cowed and a apathetic populace, the majority of whom are sheeple.