Translate

Showing posts with label Asghar Bukhari. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Asghar Bukhari. Show all posts

Sunday, 8 February 2015

Asghar Bukhari and Claire Khaw photographed together holding up our index finger signifying One God

https://concretemilkshake.wordpress.com/2015/01/06/the-islamists-at-mpacuk/

I was mentioned in the following terms in this post of 6 January 2015:

Here is [Asghar Bukhari] on 22 July 2012 posing for a photo in the dubious company of Claire Khaw, the political blogger and former BNP member who was expelled for advocating infanticide against disabled children:

10

It would be unfair of me to assume that Bukhari was aware of exactly who this person is when she presumably approached him out of the blue and asked that he pose for a photo with her. It would also be unfair of me to imply some kind of guilt by association, but since I’m blocked from contacting him on Twitter I’ll have to leave it up to somebody else to ask him whether he knows this woman personally and agrees with her views.




at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Thursday, 10 July 2014

A pro-Israeli view of a British gentile

"According to ABC News, Hamas rockets can now reach half of Israel's population. Today they aimed at a nuclear reactor, though the rocket was shot down. Why put up with this?

I am watching shouting Palestinians on the news. They are like Middle-Eastern Liverpudlians. If I were Israel I would deport all the remaining Palestinians to surrounding Arab countries. There is no such country as Palestine, after all.

Allowing them to continue to occupy the Gaza strip is merely fashioning a rod for one's own back. When they are all gone people will soon forget they were ever there. This would be better than bombing their women and children every few years in reprisal for rocket attacks. Best idea is to move them a safe distance away. In fact, as an Israeli I wouldn't tolerate a settlement so near my borders that was sending rockets further and further into my territory. As always, I am amazed at the forbearance of Israel."

"It could reduce the constant claims of 'genocide' and eliminate the need for regular bombing by annexing Gaza once and for all, dismantling Hamas and humanely deporting the remaining Palestinians. It is what Russia or a genuinely strong country would do. Having to live alongside a bunch of constantly rebellious Palestinians must be humiliating for Israel. It would be as if the United States had failed to deal properly with the Red Indians so the Americans are still attacked whenever they venture into the great plains!"

"Israel will no doubt attract international condemnation for bombing a disabled care home, but what good does tit for tat bombing do? Case for conquering Gaza seems unanswerable."

"It would be quite reasonable for Israelis to force regime change in Gaza, the administer the territory until it no longer poses a threat. Indeed, concessions could even be made to a less belligerent Palestine, just as smart new sports facilities were built in Brixton to discourage locals from rioting in the future. Israel hasn't really grown up enough as a nation: it worried about world opinion, yet Hamas easily beats in the propaganda war." 

************************
Why is the West indifferent to the fate of Palestinian Arabs in Israel?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/115677967233
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/slavoj-zizek-dares-not-say-what-i-say.html

Not only is the West indifferent to the Palestinian Arabs, they are also indifferent to the Israelis.  If either side completely exterminated each other, the average gentile non-Muslim British voter would only shrug his shoulders. This is because the average gentile non-Muslim voter has distrusted the Jew for centuries and certainly dislikes having Muslims in his country.

Campaigning Muslims against the suffering of Muslims like Asghar Bukhari are barking up the wrong tree. Not only are gentile non-Muslim Britons indifferent to the death of Palestinian Muslims, they are also indifferent to the Israelis. Worse, British Muslims are also indifferent to the death and suffering of Muslims in other countries.

The only way to make them care is to offer a solution.  My solution is Secular Koranism which for some reason Asghar refuses to discuss.

I am basically saying:


  1. The Israel project will fail unless Israel is a theocracy, because God did not want diaspora Jews coming back and just turning the modern state of Israel into a mere colonial outpost to provoke its Muslim neighbours. 
  2. The Old Testament is too harsh stoning people to death at the drop of a hat.  
  3. The New Testament is too vague and caused the Inquisition to be inflicted on Jews and Muslims.
  4. The Koran is the Goldilocks religion for Israel.  
  5. If Islam is "Judaism Lite", then Secular Koranism is "Islam Lite". 
  6. A Caliph is basically a leader governing his state in accordance with Koranic principles.
  7. A Caliphate is state governed according to Koranic principles.
  8. Once Israel is a Caliphate governed by a Caliph, then the Jews, Christians and Muslims in it can co-exist together in one unitary state in a co-mingled crowed. 17:104 http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/017-qmt.php 
  9. Judaism = Thesis; Christianity = Antithesis; Islam = Synthesis.
  10. All the Abrahamic faiths promote the same moral values of a patriarchy and all worship the same God. The only issue is which religion gives guidelines that would achieve human flourishing in this life.  
  11. Secular Koranism is a completely new idea that most orthodox Muslims hate and cannot bear to discuss.
  12. Secular Koranism, while a theocracy in the sense that it is about infusing the laws of your country with Koranic principles, does not require anyone to convert to Islam nor will there be a corruptible priesthood be brought into existence to administer its laws. Any secular judiciary is capable of interpreting and applying Koranic principles if they are made aware of them.  
  13. Under Secular Koranism brothels would be legal. http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2010/06/verse-in-koran-implicitly-condones.html
  14. Under Secular Koranism a man may have up to four wives, if he has the means and the temperament to deal with 4 mothers-in law.  
  15. Under Secular Koranism husbands may chastise their recalcitrant wives in the manner described at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/how-wife-beating-and-divorce-would-work.html
  16. Under Secular Koranism there will be slut-shaming. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379?fref=ts
  17. Under Secular Koranism we will have government by referenda. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shura
  18. Under Secular Koranism usury will be abolished and we can all default on our debts and start again.
  19. Under Secular Koranism the citizen will have a constitutional right not to be taxed more than a flat rate income tax of 20%. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums
  20. Secular Koranism will abolish all totalitarian thought-crime anti-discrimination legislation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_anti-discrimination_acts, because the Koran states that "There is no compulsion in belief." 2:256
  21. Secular Koranism will also abolish no fault divorce and require couples to agree marriage contracts before they can legally marry so that in the event of a divorce fault can be easily apportioned. In any divorce fault starts at 50/50 because at the very least the parties chose the wrong person to marry and must accept responsibility for that.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/03/islam-religion-of-politics-philosphy.html
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/what-is-secular-koranism.html

White Muslim convert refuses to discuss Secular Koranism presumably because he does not want to upset Asian Muslims
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/the-exchange-adassamad-clarke-and.html
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/abdassamad-clarke-muslim-scholar-blocks.html

The national and international uses of Secular Koranism
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2010/10/secular-koranism-weapon-to-defeat.html

How Secular Koranism would get taxpayers a flat rate income tax of 20%
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/it-is-already-illegal-to-evade-tax-so.html

How Secular Koranism would help gender and marital relations in the East and West
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/06/secular-koranism-is-secret-of-yin-and.html
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2010/06/my-interpretation-of-that-wife-beating.html

Secular Koranism would legalise brothels to break up existing matriarchal control of the supply of sex from sluts. A patriarchy would see to it that supply of sex would be mainly from wives and prostitutes.
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/feminists-want-prostitutes-dead-while.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/search?q=secular+Koranism

HOW TO SOLVE THE ISRAEL PROBLEM WITH SECULAR KORANISM
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/how-to-solve-problem-of-israel.html
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/how-leaders-fail-by-rabbi-sacks.html
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2010/12/on-israel-and-her-allies.html
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/my-nakba-dayisrael-independence-day.html
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/peace-in-middle-east-questions-to-ask.html
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/rabbi-says-islam-is-religion-of-future.html
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , ,

Monday, 30 September 2013

The wisest thing a BNP member said about Muslims and Islamophobia after attending an MPACUK conference

Asghar Bukhari



http://www.mpacuk.org/story/020913/what-missing-muslim-story.html

http://www.mpacuk.org/story/020913/how-did-our-ummah-go-greatness-genocide.html

Jeffrey Marshall of the BNP:

"The pretence that Muslims and left-lberals see eye to eye is really a nauseating conceit. Islamists are basically conservative (they would have to be if they followed the Koran) and they should openly support family values - not just keep their mouths shut over things like gay marriage. 

One bad impression I got from MPACUK's recent meeting in Barking was that Muslims are really only concerned for their own interests as a kind of pressure group - in this respect they are no different from Stonewall or feminists or Scottish Nationalists. Just as long as their interests are protected they don't much care what others do. 

It is almost as though they don't really see this as their own country - which is not really surprising, I guess. However, nationalists are at least concerned with the state of our nation as a whole. If Muslims were to be less concerned only with themselves, they could help us rebuild a decent country."

This is how I see it:


  1. Feminism is against religion, because religion is patriarchal.  Have you noticed that Judaism is a bit racist, or that Christianity and Islam are just a bit sexist and homophobic?  
  2. Feminism is also against Nationalism, because Nationalism is patriarchal.  
  3. Feminism is against social conservatism, because it promotes female promiscuity. 
  4. Social conservatism is now so marginalised it only exists fitfully in the BNP and UKIP and is constantly being salami-sliced away by their cowardly leaders.  
  5. The BNP and UKIP are afraid to question or criticise feminism because they fear alienating half their potential voters.  
  6. Most British women are sluts ie fornicatresses who have extramarital sex and most British men are MCSFs  (Morally-Compromised Slut Fuckers).  This makes the children of these sluts and MCSFs bastards.  You cannot do much with people like that without a rigorous and radical programme of moral regeneration, and this would probably involve something as revolutionary as an Islamic Revolution.  
  7. MPACUK ought to promote Secular Koranism (ie the idea of infusing the UK legal system with Koranic principles without converting a single soul and leaving the judiciary who do not have to be Muslim to interpret the laws), but they fear to tread in the territory of Anjem Choudary who commends Sharia law to the horrified British.  
  8. Most Muslims are afraid to challenge feminism because they fear being hated more than they are already.  
  9. The Sacred Cows of the British are: (a) The Welfare State (b) Feminism (c) SSMs https://www.facebook.com/pages/Are-Spinster-Single-Mums-a-burden-on-the-state/417696111659379 
  10. Even now men fear to read Simon Sheppard's Sex and Power available at http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sex-Power-Manual-Male-Female-Relations/dp/190124024X/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1380704391&sr=1-1&keywords=simon+sheppard+sex+and+power which is the male equivalent of The Female Eunuch explaining their oppression.  
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, 31 July 2012

Me and the Muslims

Asghar Bukhari of MPACUK  and me, taken on 22 July 2012


Asghar Bukhari of http://www.mpacuk.org/ and me. I thought I would do the One God sign, for the sake of symmetry. A moral unique and omnipotent perfect God is the most powerful idea man can conceive of, is it not? You do not have to actually believe in God, merely toy with the idea that He might exist, care for and wish to protect you .... The possibility is tantalising enough to be cheering and sustaining enough to me, an atheist. I am more an "ein volk, ein reich, eine partei" sort of girl.

Asghar's efforts are dedicated towards getting Muslims to combat Islamophobia, and how to win arguments against Islamophobes.  I tried to tell him that if you win all the arguments, the Islamophobes will hate you even more, because they need someone to hate, or the white working classes will end up hating themselves for being corrupted, then marginalised and despised by their own political class.

The only way to make them hate you less is to offer them the benefits of your religion.  I know this sounds very Anjem Choudary, but this does not mean we have to accept the Anjem Choudary interpretation of the Koran of stoning adulterers to death, does it?  (In fact, nowhere in the Koran does it mention stoning anyone to death, which comes from the Old Testament.)

Even if we were all Muslim, we would be quarrelling with each other over the interpretation of the Koran, and this creative tension is fine by me.

I am basically selling people my interpretation of the Koran.  If you like my interpretation and wish to abolish usury, rampant consumerism, the Worship of Mammon, and the insane gynocentrism of unchecked feminism, then get in touch.  Support me, bankroll me, fund my racially neutral civic nationalist party and I will effect change for you.  That is all I ask.

All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.  Nietzsche

HOW TO ESTABLISH A BRITISH CALIPHATE IN ONE EASY STEP, WITHOUT CONVERTING A SINGLE SOUL

What is this first step?

The Koran is generally acknowledged to be a great work of literature, even by non-Muslims.

It is also said to be the directly revealed Word of God.

If that is so, it should be regarded as a contract between God and Man.

It promises to be a warning and a guide for mankind and warrants that its guidance will keep man peaceful and at peace with himself, but only if its directions are followed.

While it is said to be a religion of peace, it is also a religion of war – a war against evil and oppression, idolatry and irrationality, intoxication and sexual licence.

This being so, it would benefit law students to study such a divine contract, whether or not they are Muslim as it would usefully add to their legal knowledge and drafting skills.

Even if Koranic knowledge were acquired reluctantly, just for the utilitarian purpose of passing a law exam and getting a law degree, it is very likely that the law student who goes on to becomes a legal practitioner will apply Koranic principles either consciously or unconsciously when interpreting and applying the law.

An example of this is seen in the case of Donoghue v Stevenson http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donoghue_v_Stevenson which promoted the Christian principle of love thy neighbour. The Koran has a similar principle too.

004.036
YUSUFALI: Serve Allah, and join not any partners with Him; and do good- to parents, kinsfolk, orphans, those in need, neighbours who are near, neighbours who are strangers, the companion by your side, the wayfarer (ye meet), and what your right hands possess: For Allah loveth not the arrogant, the vainglorious;-
PICKTHAL: And serve Allah. Ascribe no thing as partner unto Him. (Show) kindness unto parents, and unto near kindred, and orphans, and the needy, and unto the neighbour who is of kin (unto you) and the neighbour who is not of kin, and the fellow-traveller and the wayfarer and (the slaves) whom your right hands possess. Lo! Allah loveth not such as are proud and boastful,
SHAKIR: And serve Allah and do not associate any thing with Him and be good to the parents and to the near of kin and the orphans and the needy and the neighbor of (your) kin and the alien neighbor, and the companion in a journey and the wayfarer and those whom your right hands possess; surely Allah does not love him who is proud, boastful;

There will doubtless be skeptics and Islamophobes who will have to be persuaded of the wisdom of adopting such a course, which they will find objectionable and controversial.

To counter them, simply form a Koran Book Club and offer generous prizes to non-Muslims for essays that confirm that the Koran is the best guide to mankind or which persuasively propose a viable alternative.

The Caliphate should be fully mature in about two decades, I predict.


http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/03/islam-religion-of-politics-philosphy.html
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2010/10/secular-koranism-weapon-to-defeat.html
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/04/my-politics.html
at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Sunday, 27 February 2011

Claire Khaw disabled from commenting on the MPACUK Facebook page without explanation or warning

http://www.facebook.com/mpacuk.org?ref=ts#!/mpacuk.org?v=wall

I wonder what they have to say for themselves.  Are they becoming part of the liberal establishment and exercising their right to censor everything that they disagree with, without feeling obliged to give warning or explanation, just like the Today Programme Facebook page?

I think the Muslims are integrating awfully well into the hypocrisy and cowardice of the Liberal establishment.

I have asked Asghar Bukhari but he says it is nothing to do with him.  Same thing happened a few years ago on their MPACUK forum at http://forum.mpacuk.org/

For the sake of completeness, I will send an email to

info@mpacuk.org

though I imagine that they will, just like Dominic Groves of the Today Programme, continue to ignore my repeated requests for an explanation and evidence that I have transgressed their rules, whatever they are.  
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, 17 November 2010

Asghar Bukhari of MPAC defriends me for saying Muslims MUST and SHOULD continue to protest offensively against the war

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asghar_Bukhari

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Public_Affairs_Committee_UK

Asghar Bukhari has defriended me on Facebook because I said that anti-war protests must necessarily be offensive to work and that Muslims Against Crusaders  were doing a good job really.  No pain, no gain and all that.  

I suggested that MAC would do better for themselves if they pretended they cared about white working class British soldiers being sent to Afghanistan to die for Israel, Bush, Blair, Brown and Cameron and all the warmongering MPs who voted to invade Iraq and Afghanistan.  Instead of the MAC calling British soldiers murderers, rapists etc who deserve to roast in hell, they should instead express their deep concern that these soldiers are dying for a lost and dishonorable cause which is in any case against the British National Interest and invite the BNP to join them in protesting against the war. 

It could be pointed out to the Wootton Bassetters by MAC in slightly more emollient tones that dying in a dishonorable and disgraceful unwinnable war is far far worse than converting to Islam in prison after having been court martialled for mutinying.. 



Asghar response was:

"Claire what are you on about? If you think that faking it is the best wat forward you have serious problems."
and then he defriended me without waiting for an answer. 

I just wonder what's so wrong about that though.

Understandably Muslims are nervous about being hated even more than they are already, but if the war carries on and the MAC carry on the way they have been doing, the hatred against Muslims would rage more ferociously anyway. 

It does seem that Roshanara Choudhry (is she any relation of Anjem's, I wonder?) has probably done us all a favour by stabbing Stephen Timms.  If more of them are stabbed, this would make it more likely for for MPs who voted for the war at


http://www.naba.org.uk/CONTENT/TheAssociation/Parliament/MPs_Vote_War_on_Iraq.pdf

to express remorse, regret and recant, like Clare Short.

Once enough of them do - whether out of genuine remorse or because they fear for their lives - our boys will be home sooner with less loss of life.  Once the war ends, there will be no more Wootton Bassett coffin drive-bys for the MAC to attend in order to provoke the local populace, and Muslims will not be quite so hated. 

Will someone please tell me exactly what is wrong with this piece reasoning?

Sometimes you have to keep pushing at something until it gives.  Half measures are just a waste of time.
at 13 comments:
Labels: , , , , , , ,

Monday, 15 November 2010

My Facebook friends outed as Nazis by Zionist Liberal Fascists at Harry's Place

My walls have ears, and Big Brother is watching me!

http://hurryupharry.org/2010/11/15/respect-asghar-bukhari-and-the-nazis/
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

God behaving badly

1:03:00  CLAIRE  KHAW joins to say God in the Koran is more reasonable than God in the Old Testament, but there is only one Abrahamic God.  ...