Translate

Showing posts with label foreign policy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label foreign policy. Show all posts

Wednesday, 9 May 2018

Questions for Muslim thinkers

  1. Do Muslims suffer because they do not follow the Koran correctly?
  2. Why don't Muslims follow the Koran correctly?
  3. What would make Muslims follow the Koran correctly?
  4. If Islam is so great, why are Muslim countries not better governed than liberal democracies whose laws go against Islamic principles, eg the normalisation of the fornication, divorce, single motherhood, the civil partnership and gay marriage, usury etc? 
  5. Does bad government policy cause terrorism?
  6. If Muslims as individuals cannot follow the Koran correctly, should their government on their behalves establish a theocracy ie a government that will enact Koranic laws that would make  the majority of members of that society lead an Islamic lifestyle?  
  7. How can Muslims in the West peacefully persuade Western Islamophobes that a theocracy would be better for them than their obviously failing liberal democracy?  
  8. Would pointing out the failures of liberal democracy assist Muslims in persuading Western Islamophobes that it is time to establish a theocracy in order to restore the patriarchy?  
  9. Would Islam deal with the disease of the mind that is feminism once and for all if followed correctly?
  10. Is feminism the evil that Muslims ought to forbid because it has normalised fornication, unmarried parenthood, child abandonment, underage sex, bastardy, juvenile delinquency and the phenomenon of unmarriageable and unemployable criminal men from the lower classes who have virtually no hope of gainful employment because of their background and upbringing?
  11. Is a flat rate income tax of 20% supported by the Koran? 
  12. Could the prospect of capital and corporal punishment that the Koran approves of in principle deal with criminality in the West more cheaply?
  13. Is quran.com/24/2 the most effective non-lethal way of shaming fornicating immoral women and the immoral men who have sex with them who then go on to become the unmarried parents of children they will abandon into the care system who will become victims of child sexual abuse?
  14. Would the banning of usury curtail Jewish power?
  15. Would a more Islamic Western foreign policy provoke less terrorism? 
  16. If we abolish usury, we could default on our debts, couldn't we?
  17. Do Jews get themselves into practising usury provoking the antisemitism they are always complaining about?
  18. Would it be a good thing for Jews if usury were banned because that would stop them getting into trouble with the gentile provoking the antisemitism they are always suffering and complaining about? 
  19. Should Jews be promoting Islam because it is conformity with the Noahide laws that they should be promoting? http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-seven-noachide-laws
  20. Is Christianity idolatrous?
  21. Is Islam less restrictive than Orthodox Judaism?
at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Thursday, 27 April 2017

Nationalism, Feminism and Foreign Policy

Only Marine Le Pen Represents France

French tweeter to Claire Khaw:

Yes it's pretty well the situation we are facing. As I said since last November Le Pen will not win, France is not the US the French are like women in general they will always choose security and comfort over freedom. The rest is just show off.

 Claire Khaw:

Which is why men must denounce feminism.
at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Sunday, 13 September 2015

Advice on preventing radicalisation government will ignore in favour of more restrictions on our liberties

http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/133007027841


Stop giving the impression that the government is run by feminazis, imbeciles, incompetents, sexual degenerates, lunatics and extremists who will never enter into a full and frank discussion about government policies because they already know are morally and intellectually indefensible.

If not, the government would have to remove the ability of citizens to use reason and access to the news.

We should have a Saturday evening TV programme using the rules of a debating society in which all UK viewers can vote by text. It would be a hit.

Motions I'd like to see proposed are:


  1. Democracy is not serving the long term British national interest and the franchise should be narrowed under a one party state.
  2. Britain is a vassal state of the US.
  3. The American government is in the thrall of the Israel lobby, therefore the rest of the world is similarly in thrall to the Jewish and Israeli interests because Western imperialism is represented by America.
  4. Britain does not have an independent foreign policy.
  5. Britain is the 51st state of America.
  6. After WW2, the British lost their empire while the Americans gained one.
  7. No nation that calls itself a free country could with integrity claim it has free speech if Holocaust Denial legislation criminalises and imprisons historians for saying the wrong number.
  8. The cause of antisemitism worldwide is America's increasingly aggressive foreign policy, perceived to be implemented at the behest of Israel.
  9. Christianity has fallen to gay marriage, ergo Christianity has failed.
  10. Islam is the most natural replacement of the failed religion that is Christianity.
  11. Britain lost its world empire because of the operation of democracy.
  12. Sexual morality is linked to the health and duration of your civilisation.
  13. Sexual morality is really about how far society or an individual deviates from the ideal of traditional marriage: the prohibition of extramarital sex ie fornication, adultery and sodomy.
  14. Britain and the West is now a matriarchy.
  15. All advanced civilisations are patriarchal, and all declining and primitive societies are matriarchal.
  16. A patriarchy is a society that condones male promiscuity, a matriarchy female promiscuity.
  17. Matriarchies are either primitive or degenerate.
  18. The cure for feminism is Islam.
  19. The quickest way to destroy feminism is repeal the Equality Act 2010 and abolish no fault divorce.
  20. Feminism causes degeneracy by encouraging women to be sluts.
  21. Sluts giving sex to men for free corrupts their natures lowering them in status till they are lower than the worst kind of woman - the unfit unmarried mother.
  22. When the men of your society are perceived to be in fear of the worst kind of women, you are advertising to the rest of the world that you are ripe for invasion and exploitation.
  23. Egalitarianism is based on a lie since we are patently not equal.
  24. Sluts and socialists are the eternal enemies of society.
  25. The West is a senescent society of elderly, effete and effeminate men afraid of sluts.

Pankaj Mishra:

"Powerlessness and deprivation [felt by the emasculated beta male] are exacerbated today by the ability, boosted by digital media, to constantly compare your life with the lives of the fortunate (especially women entering the workforce or prominent in the public sphere: a common source of rage for men with siege mentalities worldwide)."


NB: There is no alpha male of Britain. There are no alpha males because no male politician has criticised the Slut Single Mother since 1974 and got away with it. Keith Joseph tried and he ended up having to stand aside for Margaret Thatcher. The British matriarchy was therefore established in 1974, 41 years ago. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron

Charlotte Proudman, 27, able to so easily and publicly humiliate a 57 year old Queen's Counsel just for paying her a compliment, is the consequence of all the men of Britain being lower than the worst kind of women - the unfit unmarried mother or the SSM (Slut Single Mother). http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3229951/Ooh-la-la-hot-stuff-s-prim-barrister-centre-sexism-storm-said-men-ogled-web.html

If most mothers are SSMs, then most women are sluts. If most women are sluts then most men are MCSFs (Morally-Compromised Slut-Fuckers).

MCSFs are understandably despised for being weak and in fear their women and that is why Europe as a whole is being assailed by wave after wave of migrant swarms, attracted to this country by the easy favours of its women and the effeteness and effeminacy of its men who cannot stand up for a principle because of their terror of offending their feminazi women, much less prevent swarms of migrant African men from entering their countries at will. The migrant swarms now know how weak, suicidal and stupid the European man is. More of them will come till we are completely taken over, if ISIS do not invade us first. 

at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Monday, 29 June 2015

By refusing to discuss foreign policy the government merely entrenches the positions of radicalised Muslim youth

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/06/21/baroness-warsi-cameron-muslim-speech-condone_n_7630402.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11427370/Islamic-radicals-at-the-heart-of-Whitehall.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3132209/Don-t-alienate-terror-Tory-Muslim-tells-Cameron-urges-communities-speak-out.html

http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2014/07/exclusive-hopeless-warsi-resists-david-camerons-fight-against-extremism/

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jan/24/baroness-warsi-coalition-assault-muslims

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/baroness-warsi-tells-david-cameron-to-stop-demonising-muslims-after-isis-comments-10333647.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b060ppmb/victoria-derbyshire-29062015

From 1:31:

Nadhim Zahawi:

"There is no point talking to these people because these people want to attack our values."

Victoria Derbyshire:

"Didn't people say that about the IRA at one point?"

Nadhim Zahawi:

"This is not the same thing. This is very different."

And that's it. This is what passes for "debate" on the BBC.





Whether the West likes it or not Islamic State considers itself a state and behaves like a state.




at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, 17 June 2015

Why Muslims and non-Muslims keep wanting to join ISIS


The shit irrelevant response I received from this libtard:

What sort of shit response are we going to get from the government, I wonder.

Chris  Maslanka calls himself an "Author, broadcaster, devout sceptic, failed astronaut, Enigmatist of St Catherine's, Oxford" but that is the best response he can give. What  turd-brains Oxbridge produces these days in the degenerate West! Another reason why adolescent Muslims want to join ISIS, I guess.



at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, 14 June 2015

Jeremy Corbyn should be next Labour leader even if he won't become PM in 2020

Labour would do well to have a party leader that says something that is noticeably different from the governing party if only to give people the impression that party politics in Britain is not a corrupt political cartel and that the political establishment have not already stitched them up, even if they do not think Jeremy Corbyn can win the next General Election. Nothing is more guaranteed to bring politics and politicians into disrepute than the perception based on irrefutable evidence that they are all the same.
at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, 3 June 2015

Karaganov: "The problem of liberal democracy is very evident in Europe."

Time to dump this shit then.

Do you find this Russian easily far more convincing than lying canting warmongering Western leaders who are zombie flesh-eaters death-walking into another European war?

The Ukraine and the Crimea has always been Russia's backyard, but everywhere in the world is America's backyard.



Sergey Karaganov was foreign policy adviser to both Boris Yeltsin and President Putin and he is saying if Ukraine joins NATO it will be regarded by Russia as an act of war, geddit?

What about this guy?






Paul Craig Roberts: "Britain never makes a decision without asking America."

Who is right? Wise experienced old white men or over-promoted mediocrities in our much-vaunted and feminised dumbed down liberal democracy steering the ship of the state into the rocks?

You tell me.

Rule By The Corporations TTIP: The Corporate Empowerment Act by Paul Craig Roberts

It is an attempt by the US to isolate Russia and China.  TTIP works in the same way EU directives and the ECJ works, except it will be run by Neoconning shits bent on global domination.

Which rules are more likely to discourage war - the Wolfowitz Doctrine or the Koranic rules of warfare?

Oh, and why are the Americans taking an interest in soccer of all things and investigating Blatter, a citizen of the world's most famously neutral country, Switzerland?

Outgoing FIFA chief Sepp Blatter under investigation in FBI corruption case


"Long-arm jurisdiction," says Lisa Osofsky. Strong-arm tactics, more like. 

Looks like they think the world is their shitty little police state.


Our zombie flesh-eating warmongering leaders are blundering into another European war at America's behest. The American's don't care because they have the buffer state of the EU as well as the Atlantic. Why are our leaders throwing all this warmongering shit at the fan having locked us into the fucking room with them? 

Why can't our democracy solve this little problem? 

Russian and Chinese leaders at least on sane principles of promoting their own national interest, even if they get things wrong. On what basis do leaders of liberal democracies act on? Do they even know?
at 1 comment:
Labels: , , , , , , ,

Sunday, 26 April 2015

Does the BBC have a moral and national responsibility to discuss UK foreign policy?




at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, 19 February 2015

Why a rational foreign policy and democracy don't mix: too many moron voters who believe everything they are told

European defence ministers oppose sending weapons to Ukraine

Sending weapons to Ukraine would escalate violence – UK Defence Secretary

Ukraine crisis: Russia is a threat to other Baltic states, warns Defence Secretary Michael Fallon

What does the exchange below prove?

That morons (both in and outside Parliament) who believe any shit they are told have the vote and our democracy is based on these morons voting. That is why our foreign policy is shit and that the Third World War is yet again the fault of the White Anglo Saxon Protestant, who is already responsible for the previous two. Quite a hat-trick, eh? Once that happens, the game will be over for Western civilisation as we know it.

End of the debate by this ignoramus who shouldn't be allowed to vote.




Which rules are more likely to discourage war - the Wolfowitz Doctrine or the Koranic rules of warfare?



at 1 comment:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, 16 January 2015

The malaise afflicting Western civilisation



The America he knew is gone now.
Women should never have been given the vote.
A few logical women, but most aren't.
Women are now in positions of power.
Women don't know how to wield power wisely.
Real men, now extinct, knew this.
Men are now afraid of women.
Women vote for evil leaders.
Gay marriage is evil.
Only an act of God will save us now.

Perhaps Islamic State will save us from our evil matriarchy?

How chasing the female vote increased our taxes and the size of the state while reducing our liberties
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, 10 November 2014

Poppy Mania Day prevents any rational and impartial analysis of the insanity of UK foreign policy for the past 100 years


http://www.scottmanning.com/content/treaty-of-london-1839/
Can you find any word in the Treaty of London that obliged Britain to go to war against Germany? I can't.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_Kingdom_general_elections

The Parliament Act 1911 reduced the maximum life of a Parliament from seven years to five, however the election that would have been due by 1915 as a result of the Act was not held due to World War I (1914-1918)

At this point, the Representation of the People Act 1918 gave suffrage to most of the adult population (men over 21, women over 30).

That was when the thin end of the wedge of feminism was inserted.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/history/9602114/The-First-World-War-the-war-that-changed-us-all.html

Gone was the expansive optimism of those Edwardian years, with ludicrously young men bowling up to recruitment offices, broad grins on their faces, as they stood on tiptoe and stuck their chests out to appear older.

In its place came the horror – and the cynicism. Towards the end of the war, officers noticed that men stopped singing the morale-boosting songs they had invented themselves and were reduced instead to the miserable, characteristically English, downbeat cry of “We’re here because we’re here because we’re here.”


'We’ll be home by Christmas’: the departure of the 1st Battalion of the Mid-Kent Volunteers for the front from Royal Tunbridge Wells in 1914

http://www.lchs.museum/ww2/pow.htm




THE KHAVIAN ANALYSIS OF HOW BRITAIN LOST ITS EMPIRE

Because the British ended up destroying their greatest achievement after their reckless participation in two world wars, run on a policy of being nasty to the Germans because they were perceived to be rivals, they had to and still now make themselves believe that it was all worthwhile (because they had to save the Jews or that Hitler would have invaded Britain) because otherwise the truth would be too much to bear.  ("The horror, the horror.")

This brings to mind a game of Monopoly I once played. My opponent tried to thwart my acquisitions by buying up properties he knew I wanted, but in the end found himself so denuded of cash that he could not make the most of his opportunities or pay the rent when he landed on my low-grade hotels in Old Kent Road and the Whitechapel Road.

No sensible German military leader would have taken the trouble to invade Britain because it was a maritime nation with a navy enormously superior to Germany's. The cost would be ruinous and any victory Pyrrhic. Besides, the Germans wanted to expand eastwards towards Russia, not take on a maritime nation by mounting a blockade with its inferior navy.

As for saving the Jews, the British themselves were not too fond of them, if truth be told, and neither were the French or the Poles or the Russians or the Italians etc.

I know Irving is denounced as being a Holocaust Denier, but it is probably because he points out so many uncomfortable truths. It has been pointed out that all the Nazis did was just conduct yet another of the pogroms European Christians periodically mounted on Jews, a bit like a man coming home after a bad day at work and kicking the dog and being irascible to his wife and children.

The Nazis were not planning to exterminate them but to expel them and the Madagascar Plan is evidence of this.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madagascar_Plan

If this is so, Germany was really no worse than Britain during the Edict of Expulsion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edict_of_Expulsion


It would appear that antisemitism is in fact a problem of Christianity.

I often asked myself why this Christian hatred of Jews is called antisemitism when the Arabs who are Muslims are also a Semitic race.  I believe the answer is this: the hatred was not so much racial as ideological, since both Jews and Muslims because of their religion would necessarily deny the doctrine of the Trinity

Enforcing belief of the Trinity was what the Spanish Inquisition was all about, was it not? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Inquisition

Christians were not just nasty to Jews and Muslims, but also nasty to each other with their inter-denominational rivalries. Unitarian Christians and Quakers were also given a terrible time by the Established Church, Catholics were nasty to Protestants eg St Bartholomew's Day, and vice versa eg British in Ireland.

It was only as recently as 1813 that it became legal to doubt the Trinity without the unpleasant consequence of losing one's job.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctrine_of_the_Trinity_Act_1813

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Toland

In Toland's first book Christianity not Mysterious (1696), he argued that the divine revelation of the Bible contains no true mysteries; rather, all the dogmas of the faith can be understood and demonstrated by properly trained reason from natural principles. For this argument he was prosecuted by a grand jury in London. As he was a subject of the Kingdom of Ireland, members of the Parliament of Ireland proposed that he should be burnt at the stake, and in his absence three copies of the book were burnt by the public hangman in Dublin as the content was contrary to the core doctrines of the Church of Ireland. Toland bitterly compared the Protestant legislators to "Popish Inquisitors who performed that Execution on the Book, when they could not seize the Author, whom they had destined to the Flames".

Britain, being the most successful military nation in the world at the time of WW1 felt they could take on anything, even the Germans on land. British generals probably longed for another war just to keep their troops on their toes and periodically battle-hardened.

War was just a party for the world's most successful military nation.  Indeed, every war was a party as far as the British considered and Britain was the No 1 Party Girl of the world. It was unthinkable not to gate crash or accept invitations for a "party".  No respectable woman should accept every invitation or accede to every request to "party".  In just the same way that a party girl easily becomes a fallen woman Britain has lost her status, respectability and reputation.

Is British foreign policy now being run on saner principles?

I would suggest not.

The other point I want to make is that the reasons why Britain went to war was because it operated a system of government called democracy, which hasn't done it much good either.

If Asquith had not been worried about what the voters would think, would he have entered WW1?

If the democracy, Christianity and Liberalism are unsound ideologies to base our governments on, had we not better consider an alternative sooner rather than later?

After Hubris, there can only be Nemesis and perhaps ISIS ...



On the Avoidability of World War One


https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/sep/19/darkest-days-truth-behind-britains-rush-to-war-douglas-newton-review
at 2 comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...