On narrowing the franchise

Why won't politicians vote to abolish no fault divorce? Because that would upset female voters on whom they rely to be elected into office.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) 7 November 2017

If female voters will never agree to repeal laws that obviously undermine marriage, then it is time to narrow the franchise.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) 7 November 2017

If the franchise is to be narrowed, it should be narrowed to taxpayers only.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) 7 November 2017

If the franchise of taxpayers is to be further narrowed, then the next step is to exclude those who have had illegitimate offspring.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) 7 November 2017

If the franchise is to be further narrowed then narrow it to those who have legitimate children only.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) 7 November 2017

To vote, you must be taxpaying, married and have legitimate children. This would exclude feminists, subversives, degenerates and parasites.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) 7 November 2017

On narrowing the franchise to taxpayers only

I would be happy not to vote if I trusted my government to do the right thing. Even if you vote, play and win by the rules, the government still doesn't give you what you voted for. We should stop being so fixated on voting as a means of solving the problems of our political system. Trump's presidency has taught us the lesson that it doesn't matter who we vote for, the deep state which wants us to remain a matriarchy (because that keeps us stupid and weak) will find a way of thwarting the people's will, and that will is not to live cheek by jowl with foreigners who have just arrived and presume to be our equals in their entitlements from our government.

Claire Khaw not speaking at London anti-feminist conference on 8-10 July 2016

@AnthonyLarme Happy to help those attending @MikeBuchanan11's conference in July 2016 exactly what the problem is. https://t.co/HsX1ItMg5i

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@ntfem Will you be attending or speaking there? Even if not, I think video of the conference will be available for free online.

— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Not sure if @MikeBuchanan11 will want me at his anti-feminist conference, even if I know the problems and have the solutions.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme A possibility that the speakers @MikeBuchanan11 has invited to his anti-feminist conference won't share a platform with me.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme A distinct possibility that @MikeBuchanan11 will cave in to majority opinion rather than consider the matter objectively.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme I suggest @MikeBuchanan11 consult the other speakers about sharing a platform with me, and see what happens.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Once @MikeBuchanan11 collects comments by other speakers about me, I will plan the next stage of publicity. @AndreaHardie

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme How does @AndreaHardie feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme How does @erin_pizzey feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme How does @RedonkulasPopp feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme How does @rper1959 feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme How does @MartinDaubney feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme How does @anearformen feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme How does @JaniceFiamengo feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme How does @VictorZenMHRA feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme How does @kathycps feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme How does @Herbert_Purdy feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme How does @girlwriteswhat feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme How does @Nero feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme How does @PhilipDaviesMP feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme I will send them all the link to https://t.co/wIBkkUugLC in case they haven't heard of me!

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Is any anti-feminist in the West even asking for the abolition of no fault divorce? Has @MikeBuchanan11?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme I yesterday just realised that in the whole of Britain there is now no longer even a marriage bureau for non-Muslims/Asians.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme If men won't call themselves anti-feminists, it shows they are still too scared to challenge feminism.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme If anti-feminists won't call 4 the abolition of no-fault divorce, it means they don't understand the problem. @MikeBuchanan11

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme The problem: only low status beta males like @MikeBuchanan11 complain about being victims of feminism. They will be ignored.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Not only do women feel the greatest contempt for beta males, high status males don't want to be tainted by association.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme I am the closest @MikeBuchanan11 will get to an alpha male prepared to take risks on behalf of leaderless beta males.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Beta males are leaderless cos they can't even choose themselves a leader without female voters interfering with their choice.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme All leaders of Western political parties have to pander to the preferences of the female voter to get elected. @MikeBuchanan11

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme I propose narrowing the franchise to taxpayers only to reduce the female vote. Dare @MikeBuchanan11 endorse my proposal?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme I propose repealing all totalitarian anti-discrimination pro-feminist legislation. Dare @MikeBuchanan11 endorse my proposal?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Dare @MikeBuchanan11 say he wants to abolish the Equality Act 2010, maternity/paternity pay as well as equal pay?@AndreaHardie

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Dare @MikeBuchanan11 defy the other speakers who will probably not want to be seen on the same platform as me? I doubt it.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Only Islam will be strong enough to eradicate feminism, since Catholicism is now busily kowtowing to it. @MikeBuchanan11

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme @PhilipDaviesMP @MikeBuchanan11 Claire Khaw's Class and Gender Theory of Western Decline https://t.co/wIBkkUugLC

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme @PhilipDaviesMP @MikeBuchanan11 My talk will give beta males the only solution that will save them from feminazi oppression.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Anthony, will you please stop linking this odious woman to me, the conference etc. Why is she contacting speakers?!!!

— Mike Buchanan (@MikeBuchanan11) April 12, 2016

@MikeBuchanan11 She is doing that herself. I have nothing at all to do with that. I believe she wants to speak at the conference.

— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Thanks Anthony. I'm more likely to give birth to a litter of unicorns than CK speak at ICMI16, or attend. She's a Loony Tune.

— Mike Buchanan (@MikeBuchanan11) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Yes, I knew he would say no.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2016

@RedonkulasPopp Terrence, I would suggest you stop contacting ntfem, an odious woman.

— Mike Buchanan (@MikeBuchanan11) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme I was thinking of the publicity it wd attract if I were one of the speakers at the anti-feminist London conference. @kathycps

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Even if the idea of inviting me was considered and then rejected it would still attract more publicity than rejecting the idea

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2016

@AnthonyLarme My tagging the other speakers might provoke some discussion about having me as a speaker at the anti-feminism conference.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Poor Mike Buchanan and all the beta male victims of feminism being led by him: no imagination or courage, always playing safe.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Will any of the speakers be prepared to discuss my ideas at the anti-feminist conference? I rather doubt it.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2016

@AnthonyLarme u can only eradicate feminism by abolishing no fault divorce/repealing anti-discrimination legislation/narrowing the franchise

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2016

@AnthonyLarme My 3 proposals cannot be implemented without a probably Islamic revolution or the threat of one.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2016

@ntfem I don't doubt you have interesting ideas...it's just that some may be too extreme for most people who would otherwise agree w/- you.

— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) April 12, 2016

@AnthonyLarme I define extremism as going beyond what is necessary to solve the problem. I don't think I have gone beyond what is necessary.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2016

@ntfem I have long accepted that any true solution to feminism/bad gender relations will truly have to be from outside of the box/system.

— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) April 14, 2016

@AnthonyLarme @ntfem Claire has been aware of Conference for months. Dismissed it and Nike Buchanan as irrelevant.

— alan bowker (@slugsurmamates) April 13, 2016

@slugsurmamates @AnthonyLarme Did I say that? I meant ineffectual, of course.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2016

@ntfem @AnthonyLarme Claire always dismissive of Erin Pizzey ' s work.

— alan bowker (@slugsurmamates) April 13, 2016

@slugsurmamates @AnthonyLarme Erin Pizzey will be ignored because no one cares about the male victims of DV.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2016

@slugsurmamates @AnthonyLarme I explain why things are as they are and why they won't change unless political conditions change.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2016

@ntfem Yes...that much is true, but I'd sooner bet on the abolition of feminism than non-Muslim Westerners take up anything based on Islam.

— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) April 14, 2016

@AnthonyLarme What are beta male victims of feminism going to use to abolish feminism? Whingeing about it will never work.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Beta male victims of feminism are patients who have gone to the doctor but who refuse to take his bitter medicine.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2016

@AnthonyLarme To refuse to discuss the role of religion in instilling the mindset necessary to defeat feminism is a sign of defeat.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2016

@AnthonyLarme To defeat feminism, its opponents need to cultivate the mindset and resolution necessary for battle.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2016

@AnthonyLarme How are anti-feminists to galvanise themselves without Islam? How can beta males get the weapons to defeat the matriarchy?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Feminism and marriage are linked to each other that the operation of the rules of one affects how the other works.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2016

@AnthonyLarme I am saying that to get from A to C you have to pass through B.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2016

@AnthonyLarme How can you even begin to go about defeating feminism if you are too afraid to even analyse its power structure?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme The power of feminism rests mainly on the willingness of men to accept its bribe ie sex provided to them by fornicating sluts.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme To defeat feminism, men must first unashamedly call themselves anti-feminists and uncompromisingly support marriage.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme It is cowardly of @MikeBuchanan11 to call his anti-feminist conference a conference on MEN'S ISSUES.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme It is cowardly of @MikeBuchanan11 to not examine the link between men unwilling to support marriage and triumph of feminism.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme It is cowardly and irrational of @MikeBuchanan11 to refuse to discuss how feminism undermines marriage with premarital sex.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme While it is true men will do anything for sex including marry, only moral conviction will make them support marriage.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Beta males are not known for their moral conviction or intellect, and are mediocre in talent and conviction. @MikeBuchanan11

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme In a matriarchy, those most moved to complain about it would be those who look as if they deserved to suffer: beta males.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Perhaps @MikeBuchanan11 cannot bear to think of himself as a beta male, which is why he rejects my ideas.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme I hope @MikeBuchanan11 will come round to the idea that accepting the truth that he is a beta male would actually help him.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme There is nothing sadder than being despised and not knowing why people despise you.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme I am sure @MikeBuchanan11 already knows that women despise beta males and all his problems come from being perceived as one.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme I wonder if @MikeBuchanan11 would find any comfort in being told that there is no alpha male at all in the West.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme There are no alpha males in the West, because all Western politicians fear to criticise the fornicating slut. @MikeBuchanan11

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme An alpha male would not be afraid to criticise a fornicating slut, therefore there is no alpha male politician in the West.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Only if the West were a patriarchy again would beta males have an alpha male leader capable of protecting their interests.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme The only way to have a patriarchy again would be to make men uncompromisingly support marriage again.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme The most important weapon that could be used against feminism is not being considered, let alone discussed. @MikeBuchanan11

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Just as men were bribed with sex to marry, women who want to be mothers can be bribed with a meal ticket to support marriage.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme My proposed talk at @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference would be about how to bribe women to support marriage again.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme The problem with anti-feminists like @MikeBuchanan11 is that they are also Islamophobes. @AndreaHardie @PhilipDaviesMP

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme The problem with anti-feminists like @MikeBuchanan11 @AndreaHardie is they deny the role of religion in supporting marriage.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Unfortunately, @AndreaHardie is also an Islamophobe.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Despite the philosophical pretensions of @AndreaHardie she is clearly unwilling to enter into a debate about religion.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme I asked @AndreaHardie a few days ago what she found objectionable about my ideas and she pointedly refused to answer.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme It is not hard to guess that being an Islamophobe @AndreaHardie would reject Secular Koranism. https://t.co/2HKPKUbYSZ

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Obvious @AndreaHardie @MikeBuchanan11 don't want to discuss the role of marriage in patriarchy and how feminism undermines it.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Obvious @AndreaHardie @MikeBuchanan11 don't want to discuss role of marriage cos MRAs not interested in marriage at all.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme MRAs are like patients who say they want to get better but don't want to follow doctor's orders. @AndreaHardie @MikeBuchanan11

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Despite @AndreaHardie's philosophical pretensions, she remains unwilling to discuss the role of marriage in the patriarchy.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme I have just discovered that @AndreaHardie has blocked me. I wonder why!

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@AnthonyLarme Not only has @AndreaHardie blocked me on Twitter, she has also blocked me on Facebook. Is she brave enough to say why?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

People ignore you because you have the social skills of an autistic 10 yr old. Go away. Claire. You are graceless. https://t.co/IRffiqxIpr

— Janet Bloomfield (@AndreaHardie) April 15, 2016

@cjlatimer16 It appears that @AndreaHardie is using my alleged charmlessness to avoid the issues I raise ie her Islamophobia. @AnthonyLarme

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@cjlatimer16 It appears @AndreaHardie is using my alleged charmlessness to avoid the issues I raise ie marriage and patriarchy @AnthonyLarme

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@mdx3232 @AnthonyLarme @AndreaHardie I wonder if @JaniceFiamengo is prepared to discuss how feminism undermines marriage. @PhilipDaviesMP

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@mdx3232 @AnthonyLarme @AndreaHardie I wonder if @JaniceFiamengo is prepared to discuss the benefits of supporting marriage. @PhilipDaviesMP

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

@mdx3232 You should know that @AndreaHardie has never met me. She just hates my ideas. @JaniceFiamengo @PhilipDaviesMP @MikeBuchanan11

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016

Alan Bowker 

Still looking for that free invite to the Conference in July?

Claire Khaw 

I knew I would never get it. Buchanan is not even live-streaming the event. He is utterly without imagination. Even pretending to consider the idea of having me as a speaker and then rejecting it would create more publicity for the conference.
He cannot bear to hear that the only way to eradicate feminism now is to (1) narrow the franchise to taxpayers only (2) repeal the Equality Act 2010 (3) abolish no fault divorce.

He cannot bear to hear that the only way of doing any of the above would be after an Islamic Revolution or the use of a threat of one.

Will any of the others be saying this? Unlikely.

Not only will Buchanan not do what it is necessary to do, he will not say what is necessary to be said. He will not say what is necessary to be said because he will not think the thoughts that are necessary to be thought to say what it is necessary to say.