Jews and Muslims have the protective wrapper of religion which atheists lack. All societies have a religion or they become extinct. When the Romans stopped believing in the gods, they converted to Christianity. The Vikings were pagans who settled in France and became Christian. Where are they now? They have assimilated themselves out of existence. Monotheism is the most eloquent demonstration of less is more. Jews who were monotheists before Muslims are still with us today and the theocracy of Iran still defies America, which Britain cannot, being its poodle. If Iran had not had their Islamic Revolution, they would be practising liberal democracy and still a Western vassal state.
THE VOICE OF REASON Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
Translate
Showing posts with label Islamic Revolution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Islamic Revolution. Show all posts
Saturday, 1 August 2020
Saturday, 3 November 2018
21 reasons why an Islamic Revolution is necessary to restore the patriarchy
Below are 21 reasons why the overwhelming majority of people are far more likely to condone bastardy than not:
- People who are illegitimate
- Parents of illegitimate children
- Parents whose legitimate children have presented them with illegitimate grandchildren whom they have not rejected or do not intend to reject
- People whose illegitimate children have presented them with illegitimate grandchildren whom they have not rejected or do not intend to reject
- Sex partners of people who are illegitimate
- Sex partners of people who have illegitimate children
- Sex partners of people who have illegitimate grandchildren
- People who have failed marriages
- LGBTs
- People who have no intention of marrying
- People who have no prospect of marrying
- People whose parents have had failed marriages
- Atheists
- Socialists
- Modern Christians
- Reform Jews
- Feminists - and practically all young women identify as feminists unless they are Muslim women or Orthodox Jewesses
- Cowards afraid of being called bigots
- Men afraid of upsetting any woman to whom they seek sexual access.
- Men not prepared to relinquish sexual access to a woman not their wife with whom they currently have sexual access
- Married politicians too afraid to speaking truth to the power of matriarchy
In our shameless age, only quran.com/24/2 would sufficiently discourage sluts and slut-fuckers.
From the look of things, it appears that the patient is refusing to acknowledge that he is ill, let alone seek a cure.
No doctor will tell him the truth except me and no one listens to me anyway.
So it is most unlikely that white men will get their country back or white women will find decent white men to marry to have legitimate white children with that will be parented properly, unless the West becomes a one party theocracy led by an alpha male who will become their Caliph.
It seems unlikely that I will be on Millenniyule 2018 to discuss this though I applied nice and early. Imagine the number of dislikes and unsubscribes he would get if I were allowed to a platform on the alt-right to explain why there is no alternative!
My application to be on Millenniyule 2018
Further comments in support of my application to be on Millenniyule 2018
Livy: "We can no longer bear our vices nor their cure."
24:00 "Religion is far more powerful than politics, far more powerful than national ideology at times because it provides a structure for people to live and die within. It gives ultimate meaning and function, particularly with violence, because it is rooted in belief. What do our people believe in now? Christianity has collapsed, the educational yardsticks that used to empower our establishment that were imposed on the rest of society - classical learning - all collapsed. Vast stretches of our population know little of our history, art, architecture, law and science."
36:00 "Islam is the most right-wing religion in the world."
39:00 Jonathan Bowden tells us of his conversations with Michael Gove and Paul Goodman etc. William Hague: "We can't do anything any more. It's all over."
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/05/secular-koranism.html
From the look of things, it appears that the patient is refusing to acknowledge that he is ill, let alone seek a cure.
No doctor will tell him the truth except me and no one listens to me anyway.
So it is most unlikely that white men will get their country back or white women will find decent white men to marry to have legitimate white children with that will be parented properly, unless the West becomes a one party theocracy led by an alpha male who will become their Caliph.
It seems unlikely that I will be on Millenniyule 2018 to discuss this though I applied nice and early. Imagine the number of dislikes and unsubscribes he would get if I were allowed to a platform on the alt-right to explain why there is no alternative!
My application to be on Millenniyule 2018
Further comments in support of my application to be on Millenniyule 2018
24:00 "Religion is far more powerful than politics, far more powerful than national ideology at times because it provides a structure for people to live and die within. It gives ultimate meaning and function, particularly with violence, because it is rooted in belief. What do our people believe in now? Christianity has collapsed, the educational yardsticks that used to empower our establishment that were imposed on the rest of society - classical learning - all collapsed. Vast stretches of our population know little of our history, art, architecture, law and science."
36:00 "Islam is the most right-wing religion in the world."
39:00 Jonathan Bowden tells us of his conversations with Michael Gove and Paul Goodman etc. William Hague: "We can't do anything any more. It's all over."
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/05/secular-koranism.html
Thursday, 27 July 2017
My public letter to Lord Sacks
Sent: Thursday, 27 July 2017, 11:30
Subject: Questions for Rabbi Lord Sacks and a request for an interview
1) Nationalism cannot exist without patriarchy.
2) Patriarchy cannot exist without traditional marriage ie the enforcement of its most important rule: the forbidding and punishing of extramarital sex
3) Patriarchy cannot exist without theocracy ie the existence of laws that forbid and punish extramarital sex
4) Man created God for the above reasons.
5) Patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers.
6) Matriarchy is a society that priorities the preferences of the never married single mother.
7) All advanced societies are patriarchies.
8) All primitive and declining societies are matriarchies.
9) Discovering that you live in a matriarchy is discovering that your society has terminal cancer.
10) If the problem is matriarchy, the solution must be patriarchy.
11) If the solution is patriarchy, the solution must also be theocracy.
12) If the solution is theocracy, the solution must also be Islam and an Islamic Revolution.
13) Christianity is now indistinguishable from liberalism and this must mean it is no longer fit for the purpose of maintaining morality and patriarchy.
14) Once you have eliminated the impossible then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the solution.
15) Islam is the most advanced version of the Abrahamic religions because it guarantees freedom of belief with https://quran.com/2/256
16) If Islam is "Judaism Lite", then Secular Koranism is "Islam Lite". http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html
17) Because Christianity required its adherents to declare a belief in an absurdity as an article of faith, it was bound to fail when it became legal to deny the Trinity.
18) Because Christianity relies on a corruptible clergy to maintain morality, it was bound to fail in an environment of sexual liberation.
19) Because Islam assumes that law should conform with morality and morality conform with religion, it understands that it is the law that limits our immorality.
20) The Koran warns urges us to use reason and warns us against adhering to the religion of our ancestors just because it is the religion of our ancestors. https://quran.com/2/170
21) I am not Muslim but agnostic, but if it is really the case that Christianity is irreparable, hadn't we better replace it with Islam?
22) Wouldn't the Koranic prohibition against usury significantly curtail Jewish power?
23) Are gentiles in the West and their politicians more gullible and exploitable if they live in a matriarchy?
24) If Westerners lived in a one party theocracy promoting patriarchal moral values, wouldn't this mean that they and their government would not be so easily led into irrational and self-destructive policies?
I see from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BHJ_JCUX6s&t=21s that Rabbi Sacks is genuinely concerned about the degenerate morals of the formerly Christian Western political establishment.
He may remember our conversation after he gave his talk at https://www.kcl.ac.uk/artshums/ahri/eventrecords/2013-2014/Inaugurals/rabbilordsacks.aspx
Would it be possible to have answers in writing or in person or by Skype from Rabbi Sacks to these questions?
I have recently made two videos on my YouTube channel interviewing E Michael Jones which Rabbi Sacks should find of interest. I apologise for the quality of the first video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvkqYjQhqFQ.
The second video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8IJNvtM3qA&t=3s records both our voices clearly.
Regards
Claire Khaw
https://www.facebook.com/ZviSolomons/posts/10154681378921406?notif_t=close_friend_activity¬if_id=1501145590929567
Subject: Questions for Rabbi Lord Sacks and a request for an interview
1) Nationalism cannot exist without patriarchy.
2) Patriarchy cannot exist without traditional marriage ie the enforcement of its most important rule: the forbidding and punishing of extramarital sex
3) Patriarchy cannot exist without theocracy ie the existence of laws that forbid and punish extramarital sex
4) Man created God for the above reasons.
5) Patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers.
6) Matriarchy is a society that priorities the preferences of the never married single mother.
7) All advanced societies are patriarchies.
8) All primitive and declining societies are matriarchies.
9) Discovering that you live in a matriarchy is discovering that your society has terminal cancer.
10) If the problem is matriarchy, the solution must be patriarchy.
11) If the solution is patriarchy, the solution must also be theocracy.
12) If the solution is theocracy, the solution must also be Islam and an Islamic Revolution.
13) Christianity is now indistinguishable from liberalism and this must mean it is no longer fit for the purpose of maintaining morality and patriarchy.
14) Once you have eliminated the impossible then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the solution.
15) Islam is the most advanced version of the Abrahamic religions because it guarantees freedom of belief with https://quran.com/2/256
16) If Islam is "Judaism Lite", then Secular Koranism is "Islam Lite". http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html
17) Because Christianity required its adherents to declare a belief in an absurdity as an article of faith, it was bound to fail when it became legal to deny the Trinity.
18) Because Christianity relies on a corruptible clergy to maintain morality, it was bound to fail in an environment of sexual liberation.
19) Because Islam assumes that law should conform with morality and morality conform with religion, it understands that it is the law that limits our immorality.
20) The Koran warns urges us to use reason and warns us against adhering to the religion of our ancestors just because it is the religion of our ancestors. https://quran.com/2/170
21) I am not Muslim but agnostic, but if it is really the case that Christianity is irreparable, hadn't we better replace it with Islam?
22) Wouldn't the Koranic prohibition against usury significantly curtail Jewish power?
23) Are gentiles in the West and their politicians more gullible and exploitable if they live in a matriarchy?
24) If Westerners lived in a one party theocracy promoting patriarchal moral values, wouldn't this mean that they and their government would not be so easily led into irrational and self-destructive policies?
I see from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BHJ_JCUX6s&t=21s that Rabbi Sacks is genuinely concerned about the degenerate morals of the formerly Christian Western political establishment.
He may remember our conversation after he gave his talk at https://www.kcl.ac.uk/artshums/ahri/eventrecords/2013-2014/Inaugurals/rabbilordsacks.aspx
Would it be possible to have answers in writing or in person or by Skype from Rabbi Sacks to these questions?
I have recently made two videos on my YouTube channel interviewing E Michael Jones which Rabbi Sacks should find of interest. I apologise for the quality of the first video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvkqYjQhqFQ.
The second video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8IJNvtM3qA&t=3s records both our voices clearly.
Regards
Claire Khaw
https://www.facebook.com/ZviSolomons/posts/10154681378921406?notif_t=close_friend_activity¬if_id=1501145590929567
The more censorious, corrupt and incompetent Western governments become, the more Jews will be blamed.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 27, 2017
I am afraid people will conflate MSM with Jewish control of the media. The disgusting bias and corruption of MSM is astounding and enraging. https://t.co/nYmoNiZ7Yh— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 27, 2017
Christianity has failed and the Pope is only interested in negotiating the terms of surrender to the Global Matriarchy. https://t.co/7JvX75Pz1J— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 27, 2017
Muhammad was the Messenger of God, but I am more of a Process Server trying to effect service on a headless corpse.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 27, 2017
My moral compass is directed towards the long term national interest and the imperative to discourage the rapacious parasitism of feminism.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 27, 2017
It is my mission to deliver my message to the political establishment, who are collectively pretending not to be at home.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 27, 2017
My mission is to see that the political establishment of the West receive my questions and answer them.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 27, 2017
There is no requirement to believe that Christ is simultaneously God Himself and His son - patently an absurdity - to lead a moral life.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 27, 2017
The Koran warns us against following the religion of our ancestors just because it's the religion of our ancestors. https://t.co/42X1cQHre0— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 27, 2017
There is no need to consult the sheeple who will believe any damn fool thing the government asks them to anyway.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 27, 2017
If Britain were ruled by a dictator, I would go straight to him, but it is instead ruled by a bunch of buck-passing cowards and hypocrites.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) July 27, 2017
Wednesday, 13 April 2016
Claire Khaw not speaking at London anti-feminist conference on 8-10 July 2016
@AnthonyLarme Happy to help those attending @MikeBuchanan11's conference in July 2016 exactly what the problem is. https://t.co/HsX1ItMg5i— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@ntfem Will you be attending or speaking there? Even if not, I think video of the conference will be available for free online.— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Not sure if @MikeBuchanan11 will want me at his anti-feminist conference, even if I know the problems and have the solutions.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme A possibility that the speakers @MikeBuchanan11 has invited to his anti-feminist conference won't share a platform with me.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme A distinct possibility that @MikeBuchanan11 will cave in to majority opinion rather than consider the matter objectively.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme I suggest @MikeBuchanan11 consult the other speakers about sharing a platform with me, and see what happens.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Once @MikeBuchanan11 collects comments by other speakers about me, I will plan the next stage of publicity. @AndreaHardie— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme How does @AndreaHardie feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme How does @erin_pizzey feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme How does @RedonkulasPopp feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme How does @rper1959 feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme How does @MartinDaubney feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme How does @anearformen feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme How does @JaniceFiamengo feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme How does @VictorZenMHRA feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme How does @kathycps feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme How does @Herbert_Purdy feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme How does @girlwriteswhat feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme How does @Nero feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme How does @PhilipDaviesMP feel about sharing a platform with me in @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference in July 2016?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme I will send them all the link to https://t.co/wIBkkUugLC in case they haven't heard of me!— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Is any anti-feminist in the West even asking for the abolition of no fault divorce? Has @MikeBuchanan11?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme I yesterday just realised that in the whole of Britain there is now no longer even a marriage bureau for non-Muslims/Asians.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme If men won't call themselves anti-feminists, it shows they are still too scared to challenge feminism.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme If anti-feminists won't call 4 the abolition of no-fault divorce, it means they don't understand the problem. @MikeBuchanan11— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme The problem: only low status beta males like @MikeBuchanan11 complain about being victims of feminism. They will be ignored.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Not only do women feel the greatest contempt for beta males, high status males don't want to be tainted by association.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme I am the closest @MikeBuchanan11 will get to an alpha male prepared to take risks on behalf of leaderless beta males.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Beta males are leaderless cos they can't even choose themselves a leader without female voters interfering with their choice.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme All leaders of Western political parties have to pander to the preferences of the female voter to get elected. @MikeBuchanan11— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme I propose narrowing the franchise to taxpayers only to reduce the female vote. Dare @MikeBuchanan11 endorse my proposal?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme I propose repealing all totalitarian anti-discrimination pro-feminist legislation. Dare @MikeBuchanan11 endorse my proposal?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Dare @MikeBuchanan11 say he wants to abolish the Equality Act 2010, maternity/paternity pay as well as equal pay?@AndreaHardie— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Dare @MikeBuchanan11 defy the other speakers who will probably not want to be seen on the same platform as me? I doubt it.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Only Islam will be strong enough to eradicate feminism, since Catholicism is now busily kowtowing to it. @MikeBuchanan11— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme @PhilipDaviesMP @MikeBuchanan11 Claire Khaw's Class and Gender Theory of Western Decline https://t.co/wIBkkUugLC— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme @PhilipDaviesMP @MikeBuchanan11 My talk will give beta males the only solution that will save them from feminazi oppression.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Anthony, will you please stop linking this odious woman to me, the conference etc. Why is she contacting speakers?!!!— Mike Buchanan (@MikeBuchanan11) April 12, 2016
@MikeBuchanan11 She is doing that herself. I have nothing at all to do with that. I believe she wants to speak at the conference.— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Thanks Anthony. I'm more likely to give birth to a litter of unicorns than CK speak at ICMI16, or attend. She's a Loony Tune.— Mike Buchanan (@MikeBuchanan11) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Yes, I knew he would say no.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2016
@RedonkulasPopp Terrence, I would suggest you stop contacting ntfem, an odious woman.— Mike Buchanan (@MikeBuchanan11) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme I was thinking of the publicity it wd attract if I were one of the speakers at the anti-feminist London conference. @kathycps— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Even if the idea of inviting me was considered and then rejected it would still attract more publicity than rejecting the idea— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2016
@AnthonyLarme My tagging the other speakers might provoke some discussion about having me as a speaker at the anti-feminism conference.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Poor Mike Buchanan and all the beta male victims of feminism being led by him: no imagination or courage, always playing safe.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Will any of the speakers be prepared to discuss my ideas at the anti-feminist conference? I rather doubt it.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2016
@AnthonyLarme u can only eradicate feminism by abolishing no fault divorce/repealing anti-discrimination legislation/narrowing the franchise— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2016
@AnthonyLarme My 3 proposals cannot be implemented without a probably Islamic revolution or the threat of one.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2016
@ntfem I don't doubt you have interesting ideas...it's just that some may be too extreme for most people who would otherwise agree w/- you.— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) April 12, 2016
@AnthonyLarme I define extremism as going beyond what is necessary to solve the problem. I don't think I have gone beyond what is necessary.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2016
@ntfem I have long accepted that any true solution to feminism/bad gender relations will truly have to be from outside of the box/system.— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) April 14, 2016
@AnthonyLarme @ntfem Claire has been aware of Conference for months. Dismissed it and Nike Buchanan as irrelevant.— alan bowker (@slugsurmamates) April 13, 2016
@slugsurmamates @AnthonyLarme Did I say that? I meant ineffectual, of course.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2016
@ntfem @AnthonyLarme Claire always dismissive of Erin Pizzey ' s work.— alan bowker (@slugsurmamates) April 13, 2016
@slugsurmamates @AnthonyLarme Erin Pizzey will be ignored because no one cares about the male victims of DV.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2016
@slugsurmamates @AnthonyLarme I explain why things are as they are and why they won't change unless political conditions change.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 13, 2016
@ntfem Yes...that much is true, but I'd sooner bet on the abolition of feminism than non-Muslim Westerners take up anything based on Islam.— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) April 14, 2016
@AnthonyLarme What are beta male victims of feminism going to use to abolish feminism? Whingeing about it will never work.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Beta male victims of feminism are patients who have gone to the doctor but who refuse to take his bitter medicine.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2016
@AnthonyLarme To refuse to discuss the role of religion in instilling the mindset necessary to defeat feminism is a sign of defeat.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2016
@AnthonyLarme To defeat feminism, its opponents need to cultivate the mindset and resolution necessary for battle.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2016
@AnthonyLarme How are anti-feminists to galvanise themselves without Islam? How can beta males get the weapons to defeat the matriarchy?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Feminism and marriage are linked to each other that the operation of the rules of one affects how the other works.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2016
@AnthonyLarme I am saying that to get from A to C you have to pass through B.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 14, 2016
@AnthonyLarme How can you even begin to go about defeating feminism if you are too afraid to even analyse its power structure?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme The power of feminism rests mainly on the willingness of men to accept its bribe ie sex provided to them by fornicating sluts.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme To defeat feminism, men must first unashamedly call themselves anti-feminists and uncompromisingly support marriage.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme It is cowardly of @MikeBuchanan11 to call his anti-feminist conference a conference on MEN'S ISSUES.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme It is cowardly of @MikeBuchanan11 to not examine the link between men unwilling to support marriage and triumph of feminism.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme It is cowardly and irrational of @MikeBuchanan11 to refuse to discuss how feminism undermines marriage with premarital sex.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme While it is true men will do anything for sex including marry, only moral conviction will make them support marriage.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Beta males are not known for their moral conviction or intellect, and are mediocre in talent and conviction. @MikeBuchanan11— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme In a matriarchy, those most moved to complain about it would be those who look as if they deserved to suffer: beta males.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Perhaps @MikeBuchanan11 cannot bear to think of himself as a beta male, which is why he rejects my ideas.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme I hope @MikeBuchanan11 will come round to the idea that accepting the truth that he is a beta male would actually help him.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme There is nothing sadder than being despised and not knowing why people despise you.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme I am sure @MikeBuchanan11 already knows that women despise beta males and all his problems come from being perceived as one.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme I wonder if @MikeBuchanan11 would find any comfort in being told that there is no alpha male at all in the West.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme There are no alpha males in the West, because all Western politicians fear to criticise the fornicating slut. @MikeBuchanan11— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme An alpha male would not be afraid to criticise a fornicating slut, therefore there is no alpha male politician in the West.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Only if the West were a patriarchy again would beta males have an alpha male leader capable of protecting their interests.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme The only way to have a patriarchy again would be to make men uncompromisingly support marriage again.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme The most important weapon that could be used against feminism is not being considered, let alone discussed. @MikeBuchanan11— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Just as men were bribed with sex to marry, women who want to be mothers can be bribed with a meal ticket to support marriage.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme My proposed talk at @MikeBuchanan11's anti-feminist conference would be about how to bribe women to support marriage again.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme The problem with anti-feminists like @MikeBuchanan11 is that they are also Islamophobes. @AndreaHardie @PhilipDaviesMP— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme The problem with anti-feminists like @MikeBuchanan11 @AndreaHardie is they deny the role of religion in supporting marriage.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Unfortunately, @AndreaHardie is also an Islamophobe.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Despite the philosophical pretensions of @AndreaHardie she is clearly unwilling to enter into a debate about religion.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme I asked @AndreaHardie a few days ago what she found objectionable about my ideas and she pointedly refused to answer.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme It is not hard to guess that being an Islamophobe @AndreaHardie would reject Secular Koranism. https://t.co/2HKPKUbYSZ— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Obvious @AndreaHardie @MikeBuchanan11 don't want to discuss the role of marriage in patriarchy and how feminism undermines it.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Obvious @AndreaHardie @MikeBuchanan11 don't want to discuss role of marriage cos MRAs not interested in marriage at all.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme MRAs are like patients who say they want to get better but don't want to follow doctor's orders. @AndreaHardie @MikeBuchanan11— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Despite @AndreaHardie's philosophical pretensions, she remains unwilling to discuss the role of marriage in the patriarchy.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme I have just discovered that @AndreaHardie has blocked me. I wonder why!— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@AnthonyLarme Not only has @AndreaHardie blocked me on Twitter, she has also blocked me on Facebook. Is she brave enough to say why?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
People ignore you because you have the social skills of an autistic 10 yr old. Go away. Claire. You are graceless. https://t.co/IRffiqxIpr— Janet Bloomfield (@AndreaHardie) April 15, 2016
@cjlatimer16 It appears that @AndreaHardie is using my alleged charmlessness to avoid the issues I raise ie her Islamophobia. @AnthonyLarme— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@cjlatimer16 It appears @AndreaHardie is using my alleged charmlessness to avoid the issues I raise ie marriage and patriarchy @AnthonyLarme— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@mdx3232 @AnthonyLarme @AndreaHardie I wonder if @JaniceFiamengo is prepared to discuss how feminism undermines marriage. @PhilipDaviesMP— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@mdx3232 @AnthonyLarme @AndreaHardie I wonder if @JaniceFiamengo is prepared to discuss the benefits of supporting marriage. @PhilipDaviesMP— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
@mdx3232 You should know that @AndreaHardie has never met me. She just hates my ideas. @JaniceFiamengo @PhilipDaviesMP @MikeBuchanan11— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 15, 2016
Alan Bowker
Still looking for that free invite to the Conference in July?
Claire Khaw
I knew I would never get it. Buchanan is not even live-streaming the event. He is utterly without imagination. Even pretending to consider the idea of having me as a speaker and then rejecting it would create more publicity for the conference.
He cannot bear to hear that the only way to eradicate feminism now is to (1) narrow the franchise to taxpayers only (2) repeal the Equality Act 2010 (3) abolish no fault divorce.
He cannot bear to hear that the only way of doing any of the above would be after an Islamic Revolution or the use of a threat of one.
Will any of the others be saying this? Unlikely.
Not only will Buchanan not do what it is necessary to do, he will not say what is necessary to be said. He will not say what is necessary to be said because he will not think the thoughts that are necessary to be thought to say what it is necessary to say.
Monday, 2 November 2009
Career Advice for Beleaguered MPs and a Blueprint for a British Revolution
These MPs should make a pact to join both the BNP and UKIP, and strive towards achieving a merger. This new party - called the British National Independence Party ("The B-NIPs" for short) - should then replace the LibDems as the Third Party of British politics.
The British would then get a referendum on the EU, which Labour and Tory have conspired to prevent for so many decades.
This should mean that the British people could be a step closer to enjoying commonsense government, or a disruptive but regrettably overdue British Revolution, or a Civil War, and even an Islamic Revolution, which should clear the air a little.
After half a century of liberal ideology, the nation is in desperate need for a spring clean and an ideological clear-out.
These MPs have after all nothing left to lose but their seats and their jobs. They might as well go out with a bang rather than a whimper and become the revolutionary B-Nippers of tomorrow, if they have the stomach for this thing, which they probably won't ....
The British would then get a referendum on the EU, which Labour and Tory have conspired to prevent for so many decades.
This should mean that the British people could be a step closer to enjoying commonsense government, or a disruptive but regrettably overdue British Revolution, or a Civil War, and even an Islamic Revolution, which should clear the air a little.
After half a century of liberal ideology, the nation is in desperate need for a spring clean and an ideological clear-out.
These MPs have after all nothing left to lose but their seats and their jobs. They might as well go out with a bang rather than a whimper and become the revolutionary B-Nippers of tomorrow, if they have the stomach for this thing, which they probably won't ....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Maronite Christian @GBkishere tells us the story of his life
1:00 Sharia is the bitter medicine Westerners must take. 2:00 Maronite Christianity explained. 3:00 Adam and Eve 4:00 Phoenicians and z...
-
Key: CK = Claire Khaw CD = Claudia Dalgleish EB = Eddy Butler MC = Mark Collet TC = Tess Culnane CD on Facebook This past month...
-
Beta males will never get female attention if it is OK for women to have premarital sex. If you want beta males to have a reasonable ...
-
Why do Christians not follow the morality of the Bible? Because the Church itself does not follow Biblical principles and is only interes...