Translate

Showing posts with label Islamophobes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Islamophobes. Show all posts

Sunday, 21 June 2020

A psychological analysis of antisemites, Islamophobes and racists and what should be done about them

Most people will be hard to change on matters of religion and politics because they are such habits of thought. But there can be bad habits of thoughts that are nothing to do with the facts or arguments but about which group we want to be identified with and why. Because Jay is fundamentally an atheist though he pretends to be Christian, he will think only in terms of his immediate lifetime and himself. Nothing in his personal philosophy tells him he has any duty to tell the truth or exercise logic. If he had principles, he would be consistent. Since he doesn't, he can only say what he feels at the time about a certain thing and his moods change from day to day and even hour to hour.

The whole point about religion is that it is a group moral system which can only be said to exist if it is followed by a group you are part of. If there are no others around who share your religion, you have to say what your principles are. I would say my rules are contained in the Koran. Jay would say his rules are contained in Emmet Fox's Sermon on the Mount which was written for alcoholics.
https://www.thefix.com/content/emmet-fox-sermon-mount-and-alcoholics-anonymous

EVIDENCE OF HIS UNDENIABLE ISLAMOPHOBIA

It is breathtaking that he is saying that Emmet Fox is better than the Koran.

This is what I infer him to be saying: he is saying to the world that his shit of ignorance is better than the fine dining of a world religion.

If Jay really thinks he worships an all-powerful deity and isn't just lying that he does to impress us, you can be sure that this deity he imagines he worships shares his views on everything. This means Jay worships himself and this means he is therefore suffering from Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

The pain those who suffer from NPD is that of Cognitive Dissonance. If they are indeed the wonderful people they think they are worshipping a deity who shares their views in every regard, why do they suffer the emotional distress of having people say that they are neither clever nor funny but  instead uneducated, exasperating, self-contradictory, unprincipled, cowardly and contemptible? 

He has admitted that he has never read the Koran he bought and threw away. Why did he buy it? Why did he throw it away? If he never bought it, why did he lie about buying it? If he never threw it away, why lie about that? If he bought it intending to read it, what changed his mind? The Islamophobia that overcame him? Very little Jay does makes any sense until you see him as someone who reacts to things emotionally rather than analytically without even the self awareness to acknowledge this.

EVIDENCE OF HIS ANTISEMITISM AND HYPOCRISY

Jay has already said he would like to ban male circumcision. This is ipso facto antisemitism since the desire to do this is to show hatred and disgust for this practice and make things uncomfortable for Jews in the hope they will get the hint and go live somewhere else.

Antisemitic hypocrites will pretend to care about the foreskins of Jewish boys and are stupid enough to actually think they will be believed when they lie that they are not antisemites.

In previous conversations with me, he has said how much pity he has felt for the Jews he has observed on Stamford Hill who look so miserable to him. To pity someone is to claim a superior status, of course.

He claims he tried to engage them in conversation by saying hello to them, but why would you stop and talk to a plebeian gentile saying hello to you anyway if you are Jewish? Because they refused to return his greeting suspecting mockery or some malign purpose, Jay now hates them and feels contempt for them.

Because he is jealous of Luana, he hates her. If I like her because she is Jewish, then he hates her for being Jewish. If I like her for being all the things he is not, then he will hate her for those things rather than cultivate in himself the qualities I find admirable in people who have the confidence and knowledge to discuss their religion. I take Luana seriously as a person because her religion gives her the ability to speak consistently and with knowledge about Judaism and her dealings with gentiles as a social worker, so he hates her for these things.

Are the comments of Jay evidence of antisemitism and racism?

I have already told him how I hate the way he keeps contradicting himself but it is really a mental health issue that he cannot correct without therapy. If someone told me I had an irrational fear or hatred of something I would have to investigate if I really do have a phobia. If you believed in the Abrahamic God, you would wonder why God sent Muslims to punish you ... for what?

But Jay does not believe in the Abrahamic God that he is always claiming he has a constant connection with.

If Jews and Muslims are always the people you are complaining about, then you must have a hatred and fear of them.

If you are accused of Judeophobia and Islamophobia, then you should ask yourself whether your hatred and fear of them is in fact rational.

If Jews and Muslims are powerful minorities in your country whom your government prefers to you as a gentile non-Muslim, you must ask yourself why they are preferred to you and why they do better than you.

If you don't care about the arguments and never make up your mind about anything giving dishonest, inconsistent and unintelligible reasons, then it will be supposed that your reasons are indeed irrational or simply based on the Deadly Sin of Envy.

If your religion is already kaput, then your politicians and institutions would be corrupt and unresponsive to your needs. If Jay dares not say what he really thinks about immigration and statues to the people he knows in real life, then he it can be concluded that he is surrounded by women and leftists. It is a measure of his cowardice that he dares not verbally defend statuary and a measure of my consistency that anyone who knows me in real life would not be surprised at the views I express.

When he loses the argument, he will hint that he or others could always be helping me towards the nearest port of exit. What he and others hate about my methods of argumentation is the fact that they know, deep down that they do hate and fear Jews, Muslims and other races who compete against them.

They could do without the competition and will not be comforted by the fact that Jews, Muslims and non-whites are in fact better more useful people as far as their government is concerned because they bring attitudes, skills and capital to this country that successive governments have neglected to cultivate domestically in a failing education system that they refuse to address for fear of alienating the unions and voters.

I bear him no animosity, of course. Most of the people I associate with are constantly wrestling with their emotions of hatred and fear that their government will not protect them from those whom they believe only abuse, exploit and invade them.

My position has always been that their questions must be answered substantively.

THE FINAL FRONTIER FOR JAY

However often and simply I explain that his people cannot organise to promote their own interests because Christianity is kaput and democracy is dementia, he will reject what I say. This is because he is dimly aware that the moment he admits that the religion and political system of his country has failed, I will be commending a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism. Brutus the Eternal Anglo https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqlxPXofmbD7eOymXZz-BHg and his associates of plebeians have the same view of me. They already know they have lost the argument, but still occasionally hope I can sugarcoat the pill of Secular Koranism. In other words, they want me to lie to them. But I refuse.

Jay also knows that when he says "No, thanks" to Secular Koranism, I will ask "What better ideas have you got?" to which he has no answer, other than to say he does not think my idea will ever be adopted, everyone hates it and unlike me, he knows his place and does not propose solutions that will never be adopted.

When it is pointed out that he is an uneducated man careless with words and facts who confuses what is unpopular with what is unworkable, he will block me for an interval and then get in touch again when he thinks I have forgotten that he is really sick child who refuses to take his medicine thinking that he can really do without the cure. 

WHAT I THINK SHOULD HAPPEN TO ANTISEMITES, ISLAMOPHOBES AND RACISTS

If they insist on expressing their hatred and claim that their hatred is based on sound reasons, their hatred and fear should be addressed, of course. Over the years, I have consistently supported free speech the repeal of the Equality Act 2010.

To forbid antisemites, Islamophobes and racists from expressing their hate and fear only cements in their minds that they have suffered loss of status and other associated ills because of Jews, Muslims and non-whites in their countries. I propose that honest, honourable and articulate representatives of the groups they hate should be invited to defend themselves to clear up any misunderstanding, or failing that, allow me to assume this role. 

Sunday, 23 February 2020

Dealing with Islamophobes who reject Secular Koranism

There is nothing in the Koran that says Muslims are to kill non-Muslims because they are non-Muslims.

Any verse in the Koran that talks about killing non-Muslims are battle orders.

Those who most object to war verses of the Koran are invariably citizens of NATO member states and these nations are infamous for their imperialism and militarism, having participated in two World Wars ending in the nuking of non-combatants in two different Japanese cities.

Prior to that there were the Wars of National Unification in Europe after the 1848 Revolutions which were primarily based on the rejection of absolute monarchs after the French Revolution.

Prior to that were the European Wars of Religion which was about European nations trying to leave the Catholic Empire of Europe in rather the same way Britain tried for three years to leave the EU. Let us hope it will not take as long for the situation to stabilise as it took for the Protestant succession to become secure - about 141 years from the death of Henry VIII to the Glorious Revolution in 1688.

Europeans who became Americans to escape Christian on Christian religious persecution pursued their religious persecution against each other in the New World with the non-denominational Puritans and the non-denominational Quakers persecuting and killing each other.

Then the Americans waged a civil war on each other, which was really an American War of Unification, which was its first baby step towards global domination.

Yet it is always US and UK citizens that seem to regard a few battle orders in the Koran with condemnation and horror, as if they had never heard such a thing as killing your enemies in battle. If they could forbid Muslims from killing their enemies in battle, they would, while reserving their right to take all measures, proportionate and disproportionate to deal with their enemies eg the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, which would have found no verse in the Koran justifying it.

It has been said that Christianity and Hypocrisy march hand in hand, presumably because Christians have for centuries been practising Supreme Idolatry while condemning it in others.

Now, in the 21st century, Westerners have begun to notice that Christianity and Liberalism (and the sexual liberation it promotes from the rules of marriage and patriarchy) are now indistinguishable. Since the New Testament says nothing clearly, Christians are excused this chief defect of their religion.

On the question of idolatry, there is a strange silence. It seems Christians are now so invested in their idolatry and chauvinism they think they have no duty to answer questions on the idolatry of worshipping an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God which they should know from the Ten Commandments has been specifically and explicitly forbidden.

On the question of the purpose of religion, political activists who call themselves nationalists refuse to answer my question at all. Perhaps they can be excused for not being theologians, philosophers or intellectuals of any standing. Perhaps they are at heart united by nothing more than their common ancestral hatreds of anyone who is above them even if they are of the same race, or of a different race to them, especially if they are Jews and Muslims. To call them nationalists is to dignify their thinking too much, since they are not interested in discussing the national interest, only complaining about foreigners and Muslims whom they think the Jews let in.

In their minds, Christianity and liberal democracy were perfect and working perfectly, until the Jews arrived and ruined everything.

Their history only goes back to living memory of how things were in the 1950s before the immigrants arrived.

They seen to know nothing about history beyond that, certainly nothing about the European Wars of Religion. They are mostly ignorant of the extent and nature of the British Empire. This collective ignorance or loss of memory is to be pitied and condemned because it prevents the problems of the present from being understood as the actions of the past.

Anything wrong with their government now is entirely the fault of Jews and Muslims whom they perceive to be treated better than they - the now redundant formerly working classes - who are the entitled claimants of the welfare state. They seem surprised that they are being warehoused for extinction since they are no longer perceived as for the purpose of working by their government.

It is impossible to get anyone at all to engage honestly and rationally as well as discuss matters in good faith, because they are mostly low status, low education and low income, with a myriad of personal problems and a corridor of locked rooms and cupboards full of skeletons they prefer not to talk about.

Anyone who has a different view will not be engaged with and effectively boycotted as I am boycotted by Mark Collett and Millennial Woes. Their echo chamber will not endure the presence of anyone asking a simple question they cannot answer honestly and clearly without giving up their racist, antisemitic and Islamophobic position: what is religion for and will just their magic white skin protect them from bad government?

When I recommend my holistic solution of Secular Koranism, they will say Muslims do not follow the Koran. But the same could be said of Jews who do not follow the Torah. As for the New Testament, I think Christians are excused from following the New Testament properly because nothing is said clearly in it.

The obvious solution to Muslims not following the Koran properly is to follow the Koran properly.

The solution to Christians not having a scripture with clear instructions is to replace the defective scripture of their failed religion with one that does have clear instructions meant for gentiles who wish to worship the Abrahamic God without falling foul of the prohibition against idolatry.

Being dishonest and unprincipled men who were never impressed on the necessity in gentlemen to have a strict regard for truth and upholding codes of honour, they will not be admitting the truth, submitting to reason or engaging in the discussion of any moral or political question in good faith.

Their most immediate short term objective is to go to their graves with their incoherent and paranoid beliefs intact, because they only see things in the short term, being mostly atheists and nihilists who do not care what happens to their society after they are dead and feel no duty to posterity, even if some of them have managed to have legitimate offspring.

Their most immediate objective is therefore not to be seen to lose the argument to me and the best tactic to avoid losing to me is not to engage at all or answer my question, which they pretend not to hear: what is religion for?

Wednesday, 20 March 2019

The repellent dishonesty of the antisemites and Islamophobes who refuse to give me a platform


Thursday, 30 August 2018

The matriarchy have uninvented marriage but no senior male politician in the West will protest

https://news.sky.com/story/unmarried-mum-wins-supreme-court-fight-for-widow-benefit-11485442

The matriarchy and its lady judge Lady Hale have uninvented marriage but the men are incapable of even thinking of restoring the patriarchy. They are indifferent, silent and cowed. To them marriage is a sacrifice they no longer wish to make because they know they are unmarriageable. These degenerates no longer even have the masculinity to propose that marriage be made a better deal for men who want to become fathers of legitimate children whom they wish to properly parent.

What could be easier to do and say than to propose the abolition of no fault divorce which penalises the wealthier partner when he has done no wrong?

But these emasculated unmarriageable men instead prefer to waste their energy and time campaigning to ban male circumcision because they already know they are unmarriageable. Their game is to somehow benefit from the fact that most atheist antisemitic Islamophobic and sexually liberated gentiles resent Jews and Muslims and want to make them feel uncomfortable and unwelcome. The fact that freedom of belief is a Western liberal tradition means nothing to them. You cannot expect the degenerate to grasp and apply a principle much less adhere to it, after all.

They are to a man shameless atheists, nihilists, cowards and cattle whose main purpose is to enjoy as much sexual and sensual pleasure as they can before they pop their clogs.

Their other main purpose is to go to their grave with the belief that they, their ancestors, their government and their Christianity and liberal democracy were absolutely and perfectly wise and right about everything, until the Jews and Muslims came and ruined everything.

It is a sign of irrationality and lunacy to harbour two contradictory and mutually exclusive ideas in your mind while claiming to have won the argument and then closing your eyes and ears.

Such men and their civilisation can have no future. Nationalists who think in these terms are by definition nihilists. The people they hate and fear - Jews and Muslims in particular - however, are not.

Which is worse? To know you are definitely lost or to not even know you are lost?

Monday, 30 July 2018

How Muslims can defend themselves when Islamophobes cite the usual verses against them


Wednesday, 29 July 2015

Islam v Islamophobes


“Some people say we preach hatred. Of course we preach hatred,” cried Choudary emphatically. 

We should hate evil and love good.

How can we tell the difference between good and evil?

It is really very simple.

What is encouraged by the Koran is good.

What is forbidden by the Koran is evil.

What more do you need to know?


 To hear Anjem Choudary admit that he preaches hatred, go to 2:11



Muslims are assured of victory even if hopelessly outnumbered.

008.065
YUSUFALI: O Prophet! rouse the Believers to the fight. If there are twenty amongst you, patient and persevering, they will vanquish two hundred: if a hundred, they will vanquish a thousand of the Unbelievers: for these are a people without understanding.
PICKTHAL: O Prophet! Exhort the believers to fight. If there be of you twenty steadfast they shall overcome two hundred, and if there be of you a hundred (steadfast) they shall overcome a thousand of those who disbelieve, because they (the disbelievers) are a folk without intelligence.
SHAKIR: O Prophet! urge the believers to war; if there are twenty patient ones of you they shall overcome two hundred, and if there are a hundred of you they shall overcome a thousand of those who disbelieve, because they are a people who do not understand.

008.066
YUSUFALI: For the present, Allah hath lightened your (task), for He knoweth that there is a weak spot in you: But (even so), if there are a hundred of you, patient and persevering, they will vanquish two hundred, and if a thousand, they will vanquish two thousand, with the leave of Allah: for Allah is with those who patiently persevere.
PICKTHAL: Now hath Allah lightened your burden, for He knoweth that there is weakness in you. So if there be of you a steadfast hundred they shall overcome two hundred, and if there be of you a thousand (steadfast) they shall overcome two thousand by permission of Allah. Allah is with the steadfast.
SHAKIR: For the present Allah has made light your burden, and He knows that there is weakness in you; so if there are a hundred patient ones of you they shall overcome two hundred, and if there are a thousand they shall overcome two thousand by Allah's permission, and Allah is with the patient.


The NF was formed in 1967.

The BNP was formed in 1982.

Choudary came to the notice of the public in 2003.

Nationalism is nowhere, but Islam is in our consciousness.

From what I have observed of Muslims, Muslim men are more masculine, energetic, educated, intelligent, purposeful and better-organised than the Islamophobes who hate and fear them, evidenced in the utter collapse of the parties dedicated to Islamophobia, anti-semitism and hatred of other races. They are also younger and more technologically savvy than the senescent and technophobic Islamophobes.

Muslim men also tend to marry and have legitimate offspring and stay together for their children, while Islamophobes tend to be gay like Douglas Murray or tend to have bastards with their women who are mostly sluts. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html In other words, Islamophobes are irrational degenerates and irrational degenerate effeminates cannot win any war against those who are not degenerate who are neither effeminate nor irrational.

70% of convicted prisoners were singly parented.

The writing is on the wall, but that just means that the Islamophobes are just going to pretend that they can't read.

Atheist Islamophobes like to pretend they are more rational than Muslims, but anyone can see that it ain't so. You may hate what ISIS are saying and doing, but you would be clear about what they want and do. Has the UK government explained to your satisfaction what UK foreign policy is all about? Why won't they? MPs cannot explain its rationale even to themselves.

The British political establishment talks about extremism without being able to define it, other than to set British values in stone with their ridiculous definition of "democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty and mutual respect and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs".

Imagine a Victorian Briton reading this arrant nonsense. Will he recognise these PC Libtard values as British values? Would he be appalled that this piece of arrant nonsense that states what British values are has been set in stone for all eternity?

Individual liberty to be a slut - how good is that for the long term national interest when all the degenerate bastards are born?

Traditionally married couples are to respect gaily "married" couples? Why should those who expend their time, energy and resources and make sacrifices to bring up the next generation be treated as equal to those who have purely recreational sex all their lives and don't care what happens to their country after they are dead?

The liberal political establishment will not be answering these questions nor will the liberal media be asking them. Both are hopelessly corrupt and unfit for their designated purpose.

The British government does not see as its role the duty to promote the long term national interest and the British media, instead of asking questions, look the other way.

Therefore the only alternative to this nonsense remains Islam, I have reluctantly concluded.

What makes a violent extremist?

There is no mystery to this. Muslims are more likely to make sacrifices for Muslims than degenerate selfish atheist libtards for other degenerate selfish atheist libtards.

E O Wilson:

"Selfishness beats altruism in groups. Altruistic groups beat selfish groups, and everything else is commentary."

"Human nature is hung in the balance: our behaviour driven by selfishness and our desire to co-operate to ensure the survival of the group."

"The tension between individual and group selection is the tension between sin and virtue."

God if He exists is Darwinian. He means to demonstrate to us that those who follow His laws most closely will triumph over those who flout His laws. For this reason it is not looking good for the West, even if ISIS do occasionally misinterpret the Koran. 

Tuesday, 5 November 2013

Annual exhibition of cowardice, hypocrisy, hair-tearing, teeth-gnashing and garment-rending by Islamophobes taking place NOW

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2055365/Poppy-burning-Muslims-plan-new-hell-heroes-demonstration-November-11.html

I am delighted to hear Anjem Choudary and his lot have something planned on Remembrance Sunday.

I now look forward to the inevitable huffing and puffing from the Islamophobes both inside and outside the BNP.

I love it when these nationalists who hate


  1. Tory MPs
  2. queers
  3. Tory MPs who are queer
  4. young white men getting killed in stupid wars in Muslim lands

hate it when Muslims have the guts to say what they themselves dare not say.

Wednesday, 18 January 2012

What White Christian Islamophobes really think of Muslims but are too afraid to say

"We are Christians, white and wealthy with the nuclear bomb.  They are Muslims, brown and poor who buy their guns from us.  The religion of a bunch of sand niggers has nothing to offer us", the white man thinks.  "They are the backward brown people whose women dress up in black bin bags with slits for eyes who want to blow us up.  There is no need to read the Koran because I already know how much I hate Muslims.  The Koran is also the holy book of people to whom we were once colonial masters.  It is the religion of losers and submitters."

A self-deception of words

People using words to deceive themselves 2:00  Plenty more fish in the sea 4:00  Ignoring facts and logic 5:00  Turning your online communit...