Sharia is closer to the US constitution than the divine right of kings Americans rejected

A Christian theocracy would be totalitarian. The Old and New Testament does not mention freedom of belief and it is not a concept known in Mosaic and Roman times. We all know Muhammad was born after the fall of Rome. Christianity is known for its forced conversions, Inquisition and heretic burning.

The Koran guarantees freedom of belief with Quran.com/2/256 and this is what the First Amendment is based on. Therefore sharia is closer to the American constitution than a Christian theocracy.

Patriarchy cannot exist without marriage and theocracy

Patriarchy cannot exist without marriage, and the practice of marriage will not be respected from generation to generation without a theocracy ie a society governed by God's laws.  

You don't have to believe in God to understand this, since it is quite easy to understand that all five world religions use the Gold Standard of Marriage as a measure of sexual morality and all secular political ideologies deviate from this.

The West is now a matriarchy and feminists have already equated patriarchy with domestic violence. They now control the terms of the debate and men are now too frightened to challenge this. Men in senior political politicians know that any woman can accuse them of a historic sexual offence to destroy their lives, credibility  and career. They can do this without the corroborating testimony required by Deuteronomy 19:15.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy+19%3A15&version=NIV

What you must logically and necessarily do if you believe in the Abrahamic God

If you believe in the Abrahamic God then you would logically and necessarily have to obey His laws after knowing He has taken the trouble to reveal them.

When the Catholic Church was the European hegemon, European laws and monarchs were controlled by the Catholic Church until it lost the Wars of the Reformation. But even under Protestantism, Europeans framed their laws according to what they believed the Bible permitted and commanded.

The purpose of God is also to see that the ruler does not exceed the laws set by God and be a check on his power. "Be you ever so mighty, the law is above you" is a universal idea. Emperors of Ancient China were presumed to be given the Mandate of Heaven until it was withdrawn.

But if you believe in the eternal, omnipotent and supreme Abrahamic God who created the Universe and even now controls it, you would have to believe that everything happens for a reason, even bad things. We are being pushed along with a narrative towards a conclusion and this means our suffering has meaning, but it will only have meaning if we make a point of learning from our mistakes.

If you are an atheist, you don't have to believe in God to accept that the Koran containing the rule of law is considered to be most in harmony with the Seven Noahide laws by the rabbis of God's Chosen People.  The Koran is believed by Muslims to be from God and is clearly more efficacious in promoting the rule of law than the New Testament written by mortal and fallible men such as Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. There are no Christian theocracies now accept the Vatican, but Iran under sharia has allowed it to defy the might of America and its allies.

There is no requirement to believe in God to restore the patriarchy, but it helps.

The Khavian Argument for Theocracy and God's existence

The concept of God undeniably exists. God was either created for a purpose by Man or He actually exists. Either way, He has made laws for us to follow and whether we choose to follow them or not is a matter of morality, politics and lifestyle choice. If see the wisdom of His laws, we should follow them, whatever our view of God's existence. Once we have chosen to obey God's laws, we incline to belief. If we choose not to obey His laws, we would incline to disbelief. Our beliefs affect our actions and lifestyle choice.

The utilitarian and teleological Abrahamic Darwinian God

It is the easiest thing to demonstrate the wisdom of laws said to be from the Abrahamic God.

Once this wisdom is demonstrated and accepted, one will be led towards the logic of obeying them.

Once we accept the logic of obeying them, we would have to accept the utility of believing in God's actual existence to keep our society obeying these laws from generation to generation in order to avoid the pain of having to relearn the painful lessons of human nature over and over again.

Why the law under liberalism is an ass

The law under liberalism is an ass, but why doesn't Christianity protect Western nations from gay marriage? Because it is kaput. Can any society survive without practising marriage and family values? The fact is that a matriarchy is a society whose members mostly do not practise marriage. All advanced civilisations are patriarchies, and all primitive, declining, extinct or soon to be extinct societies are matriarchies. If matriarchy is the problem, then patriarchy must be the solution. If patriarchy is the destination, then theocracy must be the vehicle. The kind of theocracy to choose would be one based in divinely revealed scripture eg the Torah or the Koran, because everything else is changeable or would fall out of fashion. Both Jews and Muslims are agreed that Christians are idolatrous because they worship an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God.

Since the West became great as a Christian nation practising patriarchal moral values, it is time to consider its replacement, because no society can survive without a religion to bind its members together.  Religion comes from the Latin "religare", which means "to bind". Religion is therefore the means that will obtain your society social cohesion and the building blocks of a stable society are families in which both husband and wife live together rearing their children in a loving relationship. The golden thread that runs through all the five world religions is respect for the practice of marriage and family values. Christianity no longer maintains the minimum standard of sexual morality that makes couples marry before they have children. The link between criminality and illegitimacy has been well-established over the ages.

If you believed in the Abrahamic God, you would find it easy to accept that Christians would be cursed by God for practising the idolatry He has specifically and explicitly forbidden in His Ten Commandments for 2000 years without showing any signs of remorse.

Even if you did not believe in God, you should be able to see how idolatry leads to self-worship because idolatry implicitly rejects the rule of God's laws found in the Torah or the Koran. Self-worship would lead ineluctably to self-destruction, which was what happened to Narcissus. It is not for nothing that a mental disorder was named after him. How long could any civilisation survive if both the governed (who will soon become ungovernable) and their government suffered from Narcissistic Personality Disorder?

The point is that practising idolatry means that we eventually fall into self-worship and therefore what happened to Narcissus will also happen to us and our civilisation if we reject Truth, Logic and Morality in favour of our own emotional, irrational and immoral nihilistic preferences.

Why theocracy is the strongest and most stable form of the rule of law

1. Because avoiding sexual immorality should not be optional and should have the law's support
2. Because a law is more likely to be obeyed if it punishes forbidden behaviour
3. Because a law is more likely to be obeyed if the forbidden behaviour is generally agreed to be immoral
4. Because a law is more likely to be obeyed if it is all of the above and believed to be from the most powerful entity conceivable whose wisdom affirms an obvious universal and eternal truth from generation to generation
5. Because it would dispense with the need to relearn the lessons of history and biology, of nature and nurture over and over again

Jews and Secular Koranism discussed by Church of Entropy and an Australian Hindu

Please bear in mind that a Torah theocracy would be much harsher and more restrictive than Secular Koranism.  If Islam is "Judaism Lite", then Secular Koranism is "Islam Lite". https://t.co/NmH7a3u0iK https://t.co/KEgMMKzbM8

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 24, 2019

Which would you choose if you were an Israeli Jew who could not leave Israel and had to choose the following?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 23, 2019

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoning#Judaism

Torah 

The Jewish Torah (the first five books of the Hebrew Bible: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy) serves as a common religious reference for Judaism. Stoning is the method of execution mentioned most frequently in the Torah. (Murder is not mentioned as an offense punishable by stoning, but it seems that a member of the victim's family was allowed to kill the murderer; see avenger of blood.) The crimes punishable by stoning were the following:

• Touching Mount Sinai while God was giving Moses the Ten Commandments, Exodus 19:13
• An ox that gores someone to death should be stoned, Exodus 21:28
• Breaking Sabbath, Numbers 15:32–36
• Giving one's "seed" (presumably child sacrifice of one's offspring) "to Molech" Leviticus 20:2-5
• Having a "familiar spirit" (or being a necromancer) or being a "wizard", Leviticus 20:27
• Enticing others to polytheism, Deuteronomy 13:7–11
• Cursing God, Leviticus 24:10–16
• Engaging in idolatry, Deuteronomy 17:2–7; or seducing others to do so, Deuteronomy 13:7–12
• "Rebellion" against parents, after repeated warnings, Deuteronomy 21:18–21
• Getting married as though a virgin, when not a virgin, Deuteronomy 22:13–21
• Sexual intercourse between a man and a woman engaged to another man in a town, since she did not cry out, Deuteronomy 22:23–24; both parties should be stoned to death
• Forced sexual intercourse between a man and a woman engaged to another man in a field, where no one could hear her cries and save her, Deuteronomy 22:25–27; the man should be stoned

Describing the stoning of those who entice others to apostates from Judaism, the Torah states: 

If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which [is] as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers; [Namely], of the gods of the people which [are] round about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from thee, from the [one] end of the earth even unto the [other] end of the earth; Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him: But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people. And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die; because he hath sought to thrust thee away from the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage. 

— Deuteronomy 13:6–10

Quran 

"And those who accuse chaste women then do not bring four witnesses, flog them, (giving) eighty stripes, and do not admit any evidence from them ever; and these it is that are the transgressors. Except those who repent after this and act aright, for surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful."
— Qur'an, Sura 24 (An-Nur), ayat 4-5

The Qur'an does not mention the act of stoning (Rajm) for any crime.

Contrary to popular belief, the punishment for Adultery (Zina) in the Quran is not stoning to death but flogging with a 100 lashes (if the accuser can provide 4 witnesses to the act). If the accuser cannot produce 4 witnesses, he himself will be punished by flogging with 80 lashes.

"The woman and the man guilty of fornication/adultery,- flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment."

— Qur'an, Sura 24 (An-Nur), ayat 2

MFW 50 notifications from @Theocracy4all pic.twitter.com/jzgn085XK5

— Church of Entropy (@churchofuntropy) January 27, 2019

Church of Entropy is angry with me!

They complain about Cultural Marxism AKA Feminism AKA Intersectionality.  Protect yourself from Cultural Marxism with Secular Koranism!


34:00  The antisemitic assumption of this Islamophobic Australian Hindu is that malign Jews would deliberately destroy a civilisation's national identity because that would lower the gentile and elevate the Jew, turning our global village into a globo homo gayplex and Sodom and Gomorrah, and then fleeing to Israel when the balloon goes up. If this is so, these Jews have forgotten about the stumbling block they are not supposed to be putting in the way of anyone at all.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stumbling_block

45:00  Secular Koranism is discussed. Jennifer, do you know any Hindus who have read the Koran? Do you know how much reading of Hindu scripture is required by Brahmin priests and do they have to pass written examinations in this? I suspect most of them are hardly scholars, perhaps barely literate, just masters of theatricality and ceremony. An Islamic scholar would be expected to know the Koran inside out.


46:00  After two or three generations after Secular Koranism has been introduced, the overwhelming majority will believe in the Abrahamic God. I can confidently predict this because parents who don't literally believe in Santa now willingly become the High Priests and High Priestesses of the Cult of Santa at Christmas. Doubtless they will do the same thing when, after Secular Koranism becomes the law of the land, couples marry and go on to bring up the legitimate children that they have living together as a couple. Introducing God to them from a young age will be the equivalent of introducing them to the policeman who will be in their heads for the rest of their lives.


1:01:00 Elliott was asking why I was publicising Halsey's stream on https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2019/01/halsey-english-discusses-secular.html. Obviously, I was doing that in the hope of getting invited on his show and to get the alt-right YouTubers he mentioned to notice the Creator of Secular Koranism. If they have already heard of me, then obviously, I wanted to remind them of Secular Koranism and to emphasise that it is being discussed widely in alt-right circles. They may not like it, but they cannot think of a better solution to all their problems or deny that my diagnosis of the cause of Western malaise is correct. If my diagnoses is accepted as correct, then my prescription for its cure should logically and necessarily be also accepted. I do realise however that society can stay irrational for longer than I can stay alive. Since my ideas are so easy to remember, it would not be the end of the world if I will be no longer be around to be consulted to advise and warn Western governments of the finer points of Secular Koranism to avoid the pitfalls of common or garden sharia as the Muslims interpret it and apply what they erroneously believe to be Islamic principles.

My Grand Plan is to get Jews to promote Secular Koranism out of self interest. Most diasporas Jews in the West like Halsey want to stay where they are. To prevent Western nations from becoming failed states in the turbulent years to come, they must use Secular Koranism to displace the malign matriarchy run by the preferences of immoral and irresponsible women and their ill-bred bastards. Only under a patriarchy would produce enough good strong men to defend the national interest thereby preventing societal collapse. Jews have a particular role in this because they have yet to accept that Israel should be a theocracy.

Once Israel becomes a theocracy, there will be peace with its Arab neighbours, particular when Israel adopts Secular Koranism. Israeli Jews should point to https://quran.com/17/104 as evidence that the Koran is also Zionist. God obviously intends for Jews to live in Israel but Israel must be an independent nation of priests, not the mere colonial outpost of a morally rotten empire promoting global gay marriage and global Sodom and Gomorrah.

No rational Israeli Jew - religious or not- would choose a Torah theocracy because its implementation would mean being stoned to death for every little thing, including breaking the Sabbath. As Prophetess of Secular Koranism, I contend that God if He exists would want Israel to be a theocracy, and will not insist on it being a Torah theocracy, because that would be too hard even on Jews.

Once Israel adopts Secular Koranism, Western nations would follow suit, encouraging China and Russia to do so by example.

In this way will the world be a better place under Global Sharia. (Secular Koranism is basically sharia interpreted by me, a non-Muslim, ex-liberal and ex-feminist agnostic.)


1:07:00  Jennifer: "That's exactly what Claire Khaw does!" Why are you comparing me with Hank Yoo, the Oriental who thinks he is a White Supremacist, whom you say has adopted American culture? Taking an interest in US politics and observing the alt-right as an ethnographer is hardly adopting American culture.  What exactly has Yoo done that I have done? Is promoting Secular Koranism adopting Western culture? Perhaps it is, in the best intellectual traditions of Western thought! http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/05/secular-koranism.html


1:10:00  Feminism rode into town on the coat-tails of egalitarianism. Egalitarianism comes from the French Revolution promoting the principles of Equality, Fraternity and Liberty. Feminism had established a matriarchy (ie a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers who did not respect their children enough to prevent them from being born the bastards of people who would have been treated as sex offenders by https://quran.com/24/2) which displaced the patriarchy (ie a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers who want to properly parent their legitimate offspring).


1:13:00  Fascism is one party-ism.  The fasces symbol originated from Rome meant to represent national unity and the authority of the state. It can be found in Congress.  https://history.house.gov/Exhibitions-and-Publications/House-Chamber/Rostrum/ A Fascist is a Conservative who knows what it takes to promote Conservatism.  But what is Conservatism? It is meaningless if it does not include social conservatism, and social conservatism means respecting the practice of marriage and upholding family values which the degenerates of the West are no longer capable of doing because the West is now a matriarchy.

Conservatism was really Theocracy Lite since it Conservatism was a defensive ideology created as a reaction to the ideas of the French Revolution which an anti-clerical revolt when they could no longer stomach the greed and corruption of the Catholic Church and their monarch associated with it. Because of the inferior scripture of the New Testament, no clear principles can be established. Because the Koran is clearly superior in concept and expression, anyone who has read it would be in no doubt as to its principles which easily translates into legislation.

All civilisations rise in patriarchy and decline in matriarchy.

All advanced civilisations are patriarchies; all primitive, declining, extinct or soon to be extinct societies are matriarchies.

The perfect patriarchy - 100% married parents
The perfect matriarchy - 100% unmarried parents

Why are Canadian men more cucked than American men? Because the illegitimacy rate is higher in Canada.

Patriarchy has a pyramid and military command structure that allows orders from above given by the alpha male to be carried out by those below by the beta males. Patriarchy brings about male solidarity and enables male co-operation, allowing a society to deal firmly and effectively with its internal and external enemies.

Sluts and socialists are the eternal enemies of society and civilisation.

Matriarchy is the sea, patriarchy is coastal defences.

In short, it creates a hierarchical society where there is a place for everyone and everyone knows his or her place. There is less conflict in these societies than those who believe in the polite fiction of equality.

Left untreated, the disease of feminism could turn your society back to the barbarism of human civilisation before marriage was invented and could even result in the most extreme matriarchy known to us: the bee colony. We already know that male chicks are destroyed after being hatched in chicken farms. We certainly know that the only thing about feminism that men like is how it lowers the price of sex. Feminism uses sexual liberation to bribe and distract men from the damage it is doing to the civilisation their male ancestors created.

If religion used to be the opium of the people when the West took its religion seriously, then extramarital sex is now the opium of atheist degenerates of the West and those who ape the worst of the West.


This is a good livestream because it is actually about something important ie Jews, Secular Koranism and me, of course. I am basically telling Jews that Secular Koranism could save them from having to all flee to Israel and they won't all fit in there nor will they be able to take their wealth with them since buildings in Manhattan take years to sell anyway.  Jews like Halsey want to stay in America and he has expressed a fierce and honourable willingness to fight for it.  I only hope that Halsey will be brave enough to one day invite me on his channel.

I take the view that Jews are not being malign by being liberal, just as stupid and clueless as the liberal gentile.

There are more liberals than nationalists everywhere in the West - both Jew and gentile - because there are more stupid people who believe what they are told and people who prefer to go with the flow, everywhere.

Why Secular Koranism is the only honest, rational and moral choice for the early 21st century West

If there was a Creation, then there must have been a Creator, and that Creator was the Abrahamic God.

Sceptics will claim that God has died.

Even if He has died or just temporarily left the building, He would have left instructions. The Torah was said to have been handed by God to Moses on Mount Sinai and the Koran was said to be the directly revealed Word of God addressing mankind in Arabic through the Prophet Muhammad.

The New Testament on the other hand was a mish-mash ragtag by different people who never even met each other with differing accounts produced decades after Christ's execution.  To make up for the unreliability of this corrupted scripture, Christians declared Christ to be the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God. In other words, they made Christ divine to compensate for the inferiority of their scripture, therefore breaking the rule against idolatry in the Noahide laws.

https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-seven-noachide-laws

In view of the strict monotheism of Islam, Muslims were considered as Noachides whereas the status of Christians was a matter of debate. 

For 2000 years, Christians worshipped God through Christ. In other words, they worshipped God as if He were Christ, which is undeniably idolatry. During this time, anyone who questioned the Trinity would be executed or ruthlessly persecuted until they stopped doing so.

Imagine if for 2000 years every single might you announced to your flatmates you would go out but always stayed in.  If they questioned you, you would burn them at the stake or punish them horribly in some way. After 2000 years, you can imagine they would get tired of asking the same question and being punished for it, until you have become too old and feeble to punish your flatmates any more, and they just want to quietly forget about you.

What I have described above is what Christianity has become. Western nations no longer practise any Christian principle but instead practise satanism and by this I mean doing the exact opposite of God's commands by promoting no fault divorce, fornication, underage sex, gay marriage and transgenderism. It is no surprise that such degenerates would find that their governments no longer care about them and instead prefer illegal immigrants whom they bribe with passports to vote for them for at least a generation.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-mitt-romney-supports-the-status-quo-but-for-everyone-else-its-infuriating

If you care about America, you ought to oppose the exploitation of Americans, whether it’s happening in the inner city or on Wall Street.

And by the way, if you really loved your fellow Americans, as our leaders should, if it would break your heart to see them high all the time. Which they are. A huge number of our kids, especially our boys, are smoking weed constantly. You may not realize that, because new technology has made it odorless. But it’s everywhere.

And that’s not an accident. Once our leaders understood they could get rich from marijuana, marijuana became ubiquitous. In many places, tax-hungry politicians have legalized or decriminalized it. Former Speaker of the House John Boehner now lobbies for the marijuana industry. His fellow Republicans seem fine with that. “Oh, but it’s better for you than alcohol,” they tell us.

Maybe. Who cares? Talk about missing the point. Try having dinner with a 19-year-old who’s been smoking weed. The life is gone. Passive, flat, trapped in their own heads. Do you want that for your kids? Of course not. Then why are our leaders pushing it on us? You know the reason. Because they don’t care about us.

When you care about people, you do your best to treat them fairly. Our leaders don’t even try. They hand out jobs and contracts and scholarships and slots at prestigious universities based purely on how we look. 

Female voters do not care about the wrongness or rightness of these policies because they do not perceive them as directly affecting them as long as they continue to get benefits from their welfare state.  The average age in the UK is 40, which means the average voter is female and 40. A woman of this age would be a single mother with a string of failed relationships, bitter and angry with the men who have embittered, angered and disappointed her. She won't care about men at all, and if she had any maternal instincts, they would be directed at foreign men and foreign children or animal rights and environmentalism.

The preference of the male voter is completely ignored because the operation of democracy dictates that the female voter is always pandered to because the female bloc vote is crucial to getting a party elected into office.

If liberal democracy continues, then nothing will be done to address the longstanding problems of society and in the meantime everything will become worse and harder to fix, including rising crime and deepening degeneracy.

The perfect patriarchy - 100% married parents

The perfect matriarchy - 100% unmarried parents

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

London violent crime could take 'a generation' to solve

If the problem is Matriarchy, then Patriarchy must be the solution.

If Patriarchy is the destination, then Theocracy must be the vehicle.

A one-party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism to restore the patriarchy is what I propose.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

It was Judaism that kept Jews in existence for 5000 years; it is a tried and tested religion.

Christianity and Islam are derived from Judaism representing two attempts to adopt Judaism for gentiles. Since Christianity is kaput and Judaism is for Jews only, it can only be Islam, because it cannot be Hinduism and Buddhism which are even more alien to Western traditions than Islam.

If Islam is "Judaism Lite", then Secular Koranism is "Islam Lite". Or does anyone else have any better ideas?

When I discovered that all the things I felt were needed to solve longstanding social and political problems were allowed by the Koran, the answer became clear. Secular Koranism was first conceived of by me in 2009 when I posted https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2009/12/depression-dementia-atheism-and-new.html. You would have thought someone would have thought of a better idea after all this time if a better idea could be thought of, but they have not, for all we have now is Pogrom, Propertarianism and Periodic Tablism.  This means that my idea must be unbeatable and it is time to adopt it, or at least talk about adopting it.

Secular Koranism should be ideally conducted as a pilot study in Israel

It saddens me that Yoram Hazony who wrote The Virtue of Nationalism (which I have been promoting enthusiastically since I heard of it) blocked me as soon as I followed him on Twitter.
A modern reason for Post-Christian Antisemitism https://t.co/kOcQcj2r6N

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

I do hope he does not think I am an antisemite, though I have made the observation that the worst thing you could do to a Jew is force him to follow his religion properly. Am I an antisemite because Jews hate me?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

I have also said that it if Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism, then Islam must be divine civic nationalism. It cannot be denied that Judaism is really the most effective form of ethno-nationalism because it allowed Jews to remain Jewish without a homeland for 2000 years.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

I have also said that if God exists and made Jews His Chosen People, and allowed them to remain in existence and return to their homeland after 2000 years, He surely must have intended Israel to be a theocracy. The only Rabbi to have agreed with me was the late Rabbi Kahane.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

I don't see why this can't be discussed by senior rabbis. The answer is obvious to me, but it seems Jews want to escape this inescapable conclusion, probably because they fear the loss of US protection because they suspect the Americans just wouldn't support a theocracy.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

If God exists and wants Israel to be a theocracy, then He cannot want and expect Israel to remain a mere colonial outpost of an empire whose laws have fallen dangerously below the minimum standards of the Noahide laws, surely?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

I have considered becoming an Orthodox Jewess to become a member of the tribe that is the aristocracy of humanity and am well aware of the restrictions I would have to endure to be in good standing with my Holy Community. It would be awkward for Israel to be a Torah theocracy.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

God if He exists would not, I imagine, be too fussy about whether Israel is a Torah theocracy or a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism. Israel could first try Secular Koranism and if it works for them, the rest of the world could adopt it.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

The great thing about Secular Koranism is that it is also based on the Koran, and could be said to be a form of sharia but as interpreted by me, an agnostic formerly liberal feminist non-Muslim. I like to think this would mollify the Palestinians somewhat. https://t.co/Cjb0EBeWUA

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

The great thing about Secular Koranism is that it is also based on the Koran, and could be said to be a form of sharia but as interpreted by me, an agnostic formerly liberal feminist non-Muslim. I like to think this would mollify the Palestinians somewhat. https://t.co/Cjb0EBeWUA

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

The enmity of the Palestinians would be stayed, because they would in spite of themselves be interested to see if my proposed social and religious experiment works on the Israelis. In this way Israel could be like Scheherazade and eventually gain favour. https://t.co/a8CsY1G3cz

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

Should my proposed pilot scheme of Secular Koranism to be conducted in Israel succeed, then it would be adopted worldwide, making the world a more peaceful place after restoring the patriarchy ie marriage and family values worldwide. What's not to like?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

The other question I want senior rabbis to discuss is which religion the gentile should adopt now that Christianity is obviously kaput. Which is more in conformity with the Noahide laws? a) idolatrous Christianity b) monotheist Islam Surely the answer is only too obvious?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

The great thing about Islam is that it would ban usury and this would help prevent from getting into trouble with the gentile again over the tendency of individuals (both Jew and gentile) and governments to lend and borrow irresponsibly until slavery and collapse is the result.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

I was very heartened to note that the conciliatory position of @rabbisacks towards Islam discussed at https://t.co/42iquu3cR0 is in harmony with the narrative I have woven.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

Yoram Hazony should know that I have met Rabbi Sacks twice and even have an autographed book by him. I am sure Lord Sacks could in some way assure him that I am not really so dangerous. Oh, and I have also met and have an autographed book by @MelanieLatest too. @davidhazony

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

In the biblical story of Abraham’s funeral, @rabbisacks finds a prophecy of Jewish-Muslim reconciliationhttps://t.co/gCOVRrSbXM pic.twitter.com/eiZgU85RoF

— Mosaic (@mosaicmag) November 2, 2018

Isaac represents Jews, Ishmael gentiles. If the gentile were properly informed and rational, he would have allowed Islam to supersede Christianity with the support of the rational Jew, for Islam is undeniably more in conformity with the Noahide laws than idolatrous Christianity.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

If Jews are the light unto the nations, then Israel must be its pilot light. Therefore Israel must be a theocracy and should submit to the pilot study proposed at https://t.co/ZBnpUxXUg8

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

Stefan Molyneux says no to religion but I, an agnostic, say yes to theocracy

To choose to believe in God, become aware of the benefits a society would enjoy if it obeyed God's laws.

If matriarchy is the problem, then patriarchy must be the solution.

If patriarchy is the destination, then theocracy must be the vehicle.

The perfect patriarchy - 100% married parents
The perfect matriarchy - 100% unmarried parents

All advanced civilisations are patriarchies.

All primitive, declining, extinct and soon to be extinct societies are matriarchies.

All civilisations rise in patriarchy and decline in matriarchy.

Jews are the most powerful and successful tribe in the world and managed to get their homeland back after being exiled for 2000 years.

Christianity and Islam are based on Judaism.

Since Christianity is kaput and Judaism is for Jews only, there is only one rational and moral choice because Hinduism and Buddhism are too alien to Western traditions.

If you became Muslim there would be no need for a Sabbath so no need to worry about getting up early on Sunday to go to church. Muslims only have Friday prayers which is afternoon/evening.

You must know that not everyone has the intellectual capacity to be philosophers. The law limits our immorality and our laws should be in harmony with our chosen moral system which, if we are rational, should be a patriarchy supporting marriage and family values ie be a slut-shaming society that does not tolerate sex outside marriage.

Other than Islam, what else would regenerate the degenerate West and restore the patriarchy that made the West great?

The Abrahamic God is supreme, eternal, omnipotent, omniscient and perfectly moral as well as the most powerful God conceivable.



Stefan Molyneux agrees with Claire Khaw on nationalism, patriarchy and marriage
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/12/stefan-molyneux-agrees-with-claire-khaw.html

Have a smaller state, have a theocracy that will eradicate feminism
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/04/have-smaller-state-have-theocracy-that.html

Theocracy would close the Generation Gap

Conservative party whips threatened rebels with a vote of no confidence in the prime minister and a general election in order to push through a vital bill, a Tory MP has claimed, as she called for a cross-party “government of national unity” to be brought in to handle Brexit.

National Government = one party state

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jul/18/anna-soubry-attacks-tory-whips-threats-over-brexit-votes

Yoram Hazony:

The Tanakh gives rise to the idea of a nation-state. John Stuart Mill thought it was his idea but it is in fact a Biblical idea. The idea of the Jewish state depends on the idea of the nation state. The nation state is the path to human freedom. 

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/12/yoram-hazony-on-idea-of-nation-state.html

Who are the alt-right?
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/06/who-are-alt-right.html

Civic nationalism has not been tried.

The National Interest
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/11/nationalism-v-feminism.html

Self Interest and the National Interest

Defensive Wars v Imperialistic Wars

Ten Commandments

Usury

Why newly arrived Muslim immigrants do better than working class locals

David Cameron:

Asian families and communities are incredibly strong and cohesive, and have a sense of civic responsibility which puts the rest of us to shame. Not for the first time, I found myself thinking that it is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the British Asian way of life, not the other way around.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2007/may/13/comment.communities

The antithesis of a degenerate matriarchal liberal democracy must be a one party theocracy practising marriage and family values, re-establishing the patriarchy.

The end of the generation gap

The female victims of feminism

The First Amendment was derived from the Koran
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/05/the-first-amendment-was-derived-from.html

Totalitarian thoughtcrime legislation - Equality Act 2010

Conservatism comes from theocracy
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/10/conservatism-comes-from-theocracy.html

Stefan Molyneux on how theocracy could be libertarian and result in a minimal state
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/01/should-law-conform-to-morality-and-if.html

Jizya, the conditional tribute that can be avoided by converting to Islam and War
http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/islamethics/war.shtml

Usury

The Koran is like the Twelve Tables of Rome
http://www.historyguide.org/ancient/12tables.html

Gay marriage

An Islamic rate of tax is a flat rate income tax of 20%
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums

Male solidarity

Co-operation

The banning of usury would end the boom-bust cycle and keep the value of the pound in your pocket.

<iframe src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fclairekhawantissm%2Fposts%2F1921402421248785&width=500" width="500" height="365" style="border:none;overflow:hidden" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" allow="encrypted-media"></iframe>

Is Rabbi David Bar-Hayim a Zionist?

1) If God exists, surely He would expect Israel to be a theocracy?


2) How can Israel expect God's blessing if it does not follow His laws and is the mere colonial outpost of a corrupt, oppressive and declining empire?


3) What is Rabbi Bar-Hayim's view of Rabbi Kahane, the only rabbi known for advocating a Torah theocracy for Israel?


4) If Israel is to be a theocracy, should it be a Torah theocracy or sharia theocracy?


5) Would Israel being a  theocracy mollify its Muslims neighbours as well as being good for the character of Israeli Jews?


6) If Israel became a theocracy, would this not persuade Western countries to become a theocracies too?


7) If America became a theocracy, would this not be better for Americans as well as the peoples in its empire?


8) A Torah theocracy would be too difficult and harsh even for Jews so shouldn't the lower standard of sharia should be adopted for Israel?

The Arab-Israeli dialogue that would lead to peace in the Middle East

Look at the love of the women for Trump!

Look at the love! One day white women will look on me with similar gratitude and affection for Secular Koranism which will give them more rights than White Sharia!

https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2017/11/27/white-sharia-and-militant-white-nationalism

White men will also adore and revere me for saving their civilisation and solving the problem of their trouble-making women!

All they have to do is dump democracy and establish a slut-shaming theocracy and narrow the franchise to taxpayers only to disenfranchise a burgeoning parasitic class.

Taxpaying citizens would have the constitutional right not to pay more than a flat rate income tax of 20% and all totalitarian thoughtcrime anti-discrimination legislation would be repealed as being unIslamic according to 2:256 of the Koran.

The low-waged would be relieved of the burden of paying taxes and of voting.

All this can be done with only minor adjustments to the US constitution.

The US could become a one-party state without even having to change its constitution

Perhaps one day I will have statues of myself erected all over the major towns and cities of the Western world!

Restore the patriarchy with a one party theocracy

We live in a world of competing moral systems. Each religion is a moral system and each political ideology is also a moral system.

What is most noticeable is that all the five world religions have lasted much longer than any of the political ideologies you can think of.

The West is now at war with each over Trump and Brexit and this is due to the failure of its religion and political system.

Trump and Brexit represent Patriarchy trying to reassert itself over a degenerate and self-destructive Matriarchy.

Christianity is kaput because it has not protected the Westerner from the matriarchy. Also, its corruptible and corrupt clergy are about to be swept away in a tsunami of sex scandals.

The most enduring sysytem of government is not actually democracy which lasted but a short time in Ancient Greece. As for Republican Rome, its duration was noticeably shorter than that of Imperial Rome.

Now that we have acknowledged the failure of Christianity, it only remains for us to choose its replacement. It is really not so very difficult if we look at things logically.

Hinduism and Buddhism are alien to Western traditions and all advanced civilisations require the rule of law that can be attributed to the Supreme Being that is the Abrahamic God.

The efficacy of His laws is amply demonstrated by the existence and success of the Jews.

Since Christianity is kaput and Judaism is for Jews only, there remains only one Abrahamic faith waiting in the wings.

Isn't it always better to jump before one is pushed?

Defining the participants of the Culture War

Theocracy is better than the principle of parliamentary sovereignty which is the principle of having no principles

JAY'S MANIFESTO FOR HIS FASCIST STATE

1.  One Party Theocracy
2.  Everyone works/contributes.
3.  Anti liberal agenda.
4.  Health, food, exercise, well being nationally regulated.
5.  Slavery for criminals
6.  No medication for depression.
7.  No drugs. Ban alcohol, porn , gambling.
8.  Any woman having child out of wedlock forced abortion.
9.  Ban immigration unless extraordinary.
10.  Any colour or creed fine but the national identity trumps religion.
11.  Would encourage those here from other countries to go back.
12.  Make feminism a crime.


14:30  On having principles, especially moral and relgious principles and rules. People who don't believe in God don't really get principles. When you have a religion, you really get religious principles and understand why they must be followed, if you want to be accepted and identified as a member of your religious group.  Islamophobes are militant atheists united by their hatred of the Abrahamic faiths exhibiting antisemitism and Islamophobia which educated people find repulsive and frightening.

17:00  The YouTube video by the YouTuber who hated Emmet Fox's Sermon on the Mount.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDB0KgDzAYc


23:00  Rules and the Rule of Law.
24:00  The constitutional principle of parliamentary sovereignty is that it makes a principle of having no principles. A theocracy based on the scripture containing the divine laws of an eternal and supreme Abrahamic God based would stop this kind of shit dead in its tracks.


27:00  The purpose of having moral laws is to govern our behaviour towards each other so we remain in existence as a group and maintain social cohesion to avoid the situation of invaders coming into our society and taking over.  Jews were warned against disobeying the laws of God at https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy+28&version=NIV They ignored them and got kicked out of their own country by the Romans.

31:00  Rules are made to be broken.

33:00  The Ten Commandments

37:00  I have no time for Catholic guilt.

38:00  Confucius

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/confucius/

For Confucius, zhengming does not seem to refer to the ‘rectification of names’ (this is the way the term is most often translated by scholars of the Analects), but instead to rectifying the behavior of people and the social reality so that they correspond to the language with which people identify themselves and describe their roles in society. Confucius believed that this sort of rectification had to begin at the very top of the government, because it was at the top that the discrepancy between names and actualities had originated. If the ruler's behavior is rectified then the people beneath him will follow suit. In a conversation with Ji Kangzi (who had usurped power in Lu), Confucius advised: “If your desire is for good, the people will be good. The moral character of the ruler is the wind; the moral character of those beneath him is the grass. When the wind blows, the grass bends” (Lunyu 12.19).

For Confucius, what characterized superior rulership was the possession of de or ‘virtue.’ Conceived of as a kind of moral power that allows one to win a following without recourse to physical force, such ‘virtue’ also enabled the ruler to maintain good order in his state without troubling himself and by relying on loyal and effective deputies. Confucius claimed that, “He who governs by means of his virtue is, to use an analogy, like the pole-star: it remains in its place while all the lesser stars do homage to it” (Lunyu 2.1). The way to maintain and cultivate such royal ‘virtue’ was through the practice and enactment of li or ‘rituals’—the ceremonies that defined and punctuated the lives of the ancient Chinese aristocracy. These ceremonies encompassed: the sacrificial rites performed at ancestral temples to express humility and thankfulness; the ceremonies of enfeoffment, toasting, and gift exchange that bound together the aristocracy into a complex web of obligation and indebtedness; and the acts of politeness and decorum—such things as bowing and yielding—that identified their performers as gentlemen. In an influential study, Herbert Fingarette argues that the performance of these various ceremonies, when done correctly and sincerely, involves a ‘magical’ quality that underlies the efficacy of royal ‘virtue’ in accomplishing the aims of the ruler.

40:00  The Golden Rule  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Rule

41:00  Our laws should be in harmony with our chosen moral system. Religions are xamples of a moral system are Judaism, Christianity, Islam etc. Political ideologies such as Conservatism, Liberalism, Communism, Fascism, Nazism etc also come under this category, but political ideologies do not last as long as religions so we might as well choose the most practical and durable ideology available, and I recommend Secular Koranism. Judaism is the most successful of all the Abrahamic faiths because it enabled the Jews to get back their homeland after 2000 years of being without it. Judaism enabled Jews to remain a distinct group even after 2000 years of exile. If Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism, then Islam must be divine civic nationalism. Jews in Israel would be more likely to have peaceful enjoyment of Israel if Israel became a theocracy because, obviously, God if He exists always intended Israel to be a theocracy, not be a mere colonial outpost of an evil and declining empire.

45:00  Jay submits to Truth, Logic, Morality and perhaps Islam when he says under his dictatorship there would be "No drugs" and he would "ban alcohol, porn , gambling."

55:00 Jay understandably refuses to discuss his mysterious agreement with me on the issue of a one party theocracy contained in his political manifesto because he is still in the course of putting flesh to the skeleton of his idea. But I consider this progress and movement! Yay!

59:00  Jay explains his love-hate relationship with Iceland.

1:06:00 My dream as a keen amateur portrait photographer to one day visit a male prison and take flattering photos of them.

1:12:00  I think I would be quite a cheering bedside presence for the sick and dying.

1:24:00  quran.com/24/2 is better for shaming sluts than forced abortions imposed on unmarried but pregnant women.

1:25:00  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6113879/Unmarried-mother-wins-legal-battle-access-widowed-parents-allowance.html

1:27:00  I am accused of beling a liberal.

1:29:00  Prevention is better than cure.

1:31:00  Should I stay or should I go?  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAOiup-Nu8A

1:34:00  Sajid Javid  http://news.ladbrokes.com/politics/sajid-javid-favourite-to-replace-theresa-may-as-pm.html

1:37:00  The inclusivity of white nationalists is their strength
The inclusivity of nationalists would be their strength because, potentially, men of all ages, races and religions who wish to restore the patriarchy, would outnumber, outrank and defeat the men who obviously have no intention or prospect of becoming the fathers of legitimate children and who have never been married. Only men wishing to and capable of fathering the next generation of legitimate children deserve to have their preferences prioritised. White men going on about the colour of their skin as if it were a religion when it cannot possibly be is just embarrassing.

1:38:00  Uncontrolled immigration is resented by citizens of all races. 

1:39:00  People will bond as Jews did with each other when they are attacked and oppressed.
1:40:00  We are all members of different groups and often our membership of these different groups causes conflict. 
1:42:00  Identity politics and how we are statistically more likely to be murdered by someone we have had sex with eg our spouse than with than an illegal immigrant.

1:45:00  We are tired of being lied to by the political establishment. Why do they lie all the time?
1:46:00   The West is suffering from a double whammy of a failed religion and political system.
1:48:00   Slut shaming
1:49:00  I remind Jay of my proposal to go to Aceh, Indonesia to demonstrate the efficacy of slut-shaming.  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/01/qanun-jinayat-in-bandar-aceh.html

1:58:00  Voluntary repatriation and banana boats
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_boat_(ship)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_boat_(boat)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day-O_(The_Banana_Boat_Song)


2:04:00  The fact that you have misbehaving minorities means your rules are not clear.
2:08:00  The rule of law no longer operates in the West.
2:09:00  Underage sex

2:10:00  Gillick Competence

Gillick competence is a term originating in England and is used in medical law to decide whether a child (under 16 years of age) is able to consent to his or her own medical treatment, without the need for parental permission or knowledge. 

The standard is based on the 1985 decision of the House of Lords in Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority. The case is binding in England and Wales, and has been adopted to varying extents in Australia, Canada and New Zealand. Similar provision is made in Scotland by the Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act 1991. In Northern Ireland, although separate legislation applies, the then Department of Health and Social Services stated that there was no reason to suppose that the House of Lords' decision would not be followed by the Northern Ireland Courts.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gillick_competence

The Gillick case involved a health departmental circular advising doctors on the contraception of minors (for this purpose, under sixteens). The circular stated that the prescription of contraception was a matter for the doctor's discretion and that they could be prescribed to under sixteens without parental consent. This matter was litigated because an activist, Victoria Gillick (née Gudgeon), ran an active campaign against the policy. Gillick sought a declaration that prescribing contraception was illegal because the doctor would commit an offence of encouraging sex with a minor and that it would be treatment without consent as consent vested in the parent.

The issue before the House of Lords was only whether the minor involved could give consent. "Consent" here was considered in the broad sense of consent to battery or assault: in the absence of patient consent to treatment, a doctor, even if well-intentioned, might be sued/charged.

The House of Lords focused on the issue of consent rather than a notion of 'parental rights' or parental powers. In fact, the court held that 'parental rights' did not exist, other than to safeguard the best interests of a minor. The majority held that in some circumstances a minor could consent to treatment, and that in these circumstances a parent had no power to veto treatment.

Lord Scarman and Lord Fraser proposed slightly different tests (Lord Bridge agreed with both). Lord Scarman's test is generally considered to be the test of 'Gillick competency'. He required that a child could consent if he or she fully understood the medical treatment that is proposed:

As a matter of Law the parental right to determine whether or not their minor child below the age of sixteen will have medical treatment terminates if and when the child achieves sufficient understanding and intelligence to understand fully what is proposed.

— Lord Scarman

The ruling holds particularly significant implications for the legal rights of minor children in England in that it is broader in scope than merely medical consent. It lays down that the authority of parents to make decisions for their minor children is not absolute, but diminishes with the child's evolving maturity. The result of Gillick is that in England today, except in situations that are regulated otherwise by law, the legal right to make a decision on any particular matter concerning the child shifts from the parent to the child when the child reaches sufficient maturity to be capable of making up his or her own mind on the matter requiring decision.

2:15:00  Instead of answering my question on whether he approves of the concept of Gillick Competence, Jay compares me to a pitbull.


2:17:00  Complaining about Muslims is complaining about the symptoms rather than curing the disease. 
2:22:00  Feminism would be eradicated by nationalism. 
2:23:00  The supreme authority and referring to a higher power


2:24:00  Jay finally discusses the PSYCHOLOGY OF VICTIMHOOD
2:26:00  The masculinity of Viktor Orban
2:27:00  Hungary's patriarchy came from its Catholicism
2:28:00  Judaism, theocracy and a permanent solution to the perennial problems of human nature.
2:30:00  Jay accuses me of debating in bad faith about Muslims.
2:34:00  Multiculturalism
2:35:00  I sing about immigration
2:36:00  The Islamophobia conference we attended. They recorded the proceedings, I asked a number of questions, but they that video has never been uploaded.
http://finsburyparkmosque.org/new/2017/11/30/fpm-launches-seminar-series-as-part-of-islamophobia-awareness-month/
2:40:00  Why doesn't the government of white men care about them? 
2:41:00  Christianity and liberal democracy are kaput - there is a big leak in the leaky ship of state that is the West, but white men can't get it together to even think of fixing it.

2:44:00  Dennis Dale video on Guilt by Association  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/09/freedom-of-isolation.html
2:49:00  Peter Lavelle and The Duran on Kavanaugh https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLCo6vPh9wI and Crosstalk 
2:51:00  The West is a matriarchy and toxic to marriage and family values. The rotten modern culture of the West is increasing illegitimacy all over the world.  https://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/out-wedlock-births-rise-worldwide
2:53:00  Feminism in Australia where the feminazis are scarier than the ones we have in Up Over
2:57:00  The enemy within, the Yetzer Hara, the Greater Jihad ie the evil inclination  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yetzer_hara

The role of the Yetzer Hara
Midrash (Bereshit Rabbah 9:7) states:

"Without the evil inclination, no one would father a child, build a house, or make a career." 

2:58:00  All five world religions are patriarchies and their cardinal rule is the rule against extramarital sex
2:59:00  To support patriarchy, we must shame sluts
3:00:00  The Romans and the Cult of the Vestal Virgin  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vestal_Virgin
3:01:00  Denial
3:02:00  Livy: "We can neither bear our vices nor their cure."
3:04:00  Moses himself did not reach The Promised Land  http://www.aish.com/tp/i/sacks/Why-Was-Moses-Not-Destined-To-Enter-The-Land.html
3:07:00  Liberals already know they are outnumbered. That's why they will now break their own rules in the hope of winning the Culture War.
3:10:00  Jews cannot quite decide whether the Third Temple should be rebuilt because it means restoring failed Temple Judaism and its corruptible priesthood.
3:11:00  No religion, no group identity.  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/06/why-we-must-never-lose-sight-of-our.html
3:14:00  http://www.chesterbugle.co.uk/2018/01/03/mccanns-open-childminding-business/

Could God be addressing Jews, Christians and Muslims in the following terms?

2:09:00  Luke Ford: "Islam is the most powerful religion today because even if it has fewer members than Christianity, its members it does have take its religion so seriously that they are prepared to kill for their religion."

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 3, 2018

Religion has always been a weapon of war. I think God intends for Christians and Muslims to slug it out with each other because God if He exists is a Darwinian. He may very well be offended by Christians claiming an executed revolutionary is His co-equal, right, Jews and Muslims? https://t.co/r6wDW78eFZ

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

There is something repulsive, obscene, absurd and unbelievable about asking rational educated people to believe in or subscribe to the lie that a crucified revolutionary is the co-equal of the Abrahamic God. Is not the obscenity and absurdity of the Trinity obvious to you?

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=18&verse=4

Sahih International: And to warn those who say, " Allah has taken a son."

Pickthall: And to warn those who say: Allah hath chosen a son,

Yusuf Ali: Further, that He may warn those (also) who say, "Allah hath begotten a son":

Shakir: And warn those who say: Allah has taken a son.

Muhammad Sarwar: and admonish those who say that God has begotten a son.

Mohsin Khan: And to warn those (Jews, Christians, and pagans) who say, "Allah has begotten a son (or offspring or children)."

Arberry: and to warn those who say, 'God has taken to Himself a son

While Jews acknowledge that they cannot always explain God's mysterious ways, they attach meaning to suffering and try to make philosophical sense of it. @RabbiYMizrachi has suggested that Muslims are the punishment sent by God to Israeli Jews who blatantly flout God's laws.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

If it is indeed true God if He exists sends Muslims to punish Israeli Jews who flout God's laws, does this mean that observant Jews of Israel deserve to be punished too? I think God punishes them for *not* doing enough to prevent the collective chillul Hashem of the secular Jews.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

Has God sent Muslims to punish Christians too? It seems obvious to me that He must be doing to Christians what He did to Jews. However backward, barbaric, savage, primitive and inbred you think Muslims are, they are still doing better than cucked men who claim to be Christians.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

God seems to be saying: "Even if you ignore all my laws but observe just the one about forbidding and punishing fornication with https://t.co/3K8zKsPjZt, you will do better than those who merely pay lip service to marriage and now promote gay marriage, including the Jews."

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

God seems to be saying: "Even if you think the holy books of the Abrahamic faiths are works of fiction, you'd still have to admit that the Koran is superior because it guarantees freedom of belief, gives you a flat rate income tax of 20%, allows divorce and forbids fornication."

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

"The Koran would give Muslim converts the moral authority to ban usury allowing the indebted West to default on its debts it must now know it cannot ever repay. All the solutions to all their problems have been sent and delivered. Why won't they open the package?" #Islamophobia

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

"The God-given reason of Westerners seems to be in abeyance after so many decades of feminism. Is it not obvious that patriarchy is coastal defences while matriarchy - in the form of feminism - is the eternal and eroding sea? Patriarchy can only be restored by theocracy."

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

"Feminism is a disease of the mind that has eaten away the reasoning capacity of the men as well as destroying their ability to co-operate to defeat their oppressive and parasitic matriarchy. They are mere cattle, content to obey the orders of over-promoted female mediocrities."

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

"While Muslims have been sent to plague Jews and Christians for their infidelity to God's laws, they too are being punished for theirs. Things will only improve if all acknowledge simple indisputable fact of the conceptual superiority and undeniable inclusiveness of the Koran."

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

"The Old Testament which is for Jews only, forbids Jew on Jew usury, but allows Jews to practise it on gentiles. The Koran forbids it absolutely. The reasons must be obvious by now, especially to these indebted atheists who think themselves so much cleverer than Muslims?"

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

"The Old Testament does not forbid fornication, the New Testament only weakly at https://t.co/lYEz9IhPCc. The Koran that states clearly its prohibition and the method of punishment. Even the most shameless would wish to avoid publicly administered corporal punishment."

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

"If I were to send a prophet to warn the wicked people of the West, would I send a white man? He would be immediately destroyed by the matriarchy. A good practical joke would be to send a female and foreigner with excellent communication skills who understands social media."

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

"Surely no one who has followed Claire Khaw on Twitter can be in any doubt about the solutions she proposes for the declining and degenerate West? The BBC are still in denial. They will not soon complete their 5 Stages of Grief without a bit of help."  https://t.co/nITK5nwVhU

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

"Let us hope that the political establishment of the West can digest the full import of Secular Koranism over their summer holidays, and return refreshed to deal with their problems in new, rational and interesting ways." https://t.co/pnHrdJl0ps

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 4, 2018

Why the West needs to have a one party theocracy imposed on it ASAP or the IQ of Western politicians will fall to even more disastrous levels

Stefan Molyneux: "These days if you go to college, you have negative knowledge. If you didn't go to college, you have knowledge." https://t.co/wbPzqmENvZ

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) July 2, 2018

Hear the voice of the world's most repulsively stupid man. Why would any rational and moral woman fuck a man as dumb as that? The solution to stop dumb fucks like him breeding: https://t.co/3K8zKsPjZt https://t.co/Yr1vCLpJxk

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) July 2, 2018

To understand the extent and depth of Western degeneracy, listen to this man talk about his relationships.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) July 2, 2018

Idiocracy https://t.co/rIWIQIHz4c

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) July 2, 2018

If human trash could talk, it would talk like this.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) July 2, 2018

"She has brain damage, PTSD, ADHD, OCD, depression as well and the kicker is she also has dissociative disorder ... but she's black and beautiful .... "  "Stop following your cock", says Stefan Molyneux.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) July 2, 2018

If this doesn't want to make you want to shame sluts and impose a one party theocracy to stop men like him breeding, what will?

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) July 2, 2018

Watch Stefan Molyneux's face of horror and disgust. When you think it can't get any worse or stupider, the world's dumbest father comes up with something more.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) July 2, 2018

Pretty 'interesting' video - during the major flooding in Romania over the past few days. Ugh. Report: Severe Weather Turkey pic.twitter.com/XSrfYcDyeC

— severe-weather.EU (@severeweatherEU) July 2, 2018

The kicker is that this man says in the end that he is Christian, which neatly demonstrates the moral bankruptcy of Christianity.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) July 3, 2018

Why Christianity has failed

Once you admit that Christianity is kaput, then Islam is the only option. The alt-right already know this, and that is why they won't give me a platform, just like mainstream media - an entire civilisation in denial.

Liberals are always wittering on about reforming Islam. To reform Islam, the West itself has to adopt it.

Muslims have been sent to punish Christians for their idolatry.

Muslims have been sent to punish Israeli Jews for suffering Israel to become the mere colonial outpost of a declining and hatred empire that is obviously suffering from dementia.

Israel should of course be a theocracy.

If Christianity had not already failed, then the Post-Christian White Nationalist would not be forever moaning about being exploited by Jews and invaded by Muslims as well as daily in fear of alienating the feminist females he wishes to impregnate and bear his legitimate offspring whom he already knows would not dream of marrying him.

Even if he managed to find himself a wife, he would fear not being able to support her and having to send her out to work making her more likely to divorce him under the rules of no fault divorce. This means he is always in fear of his wife getting so irritated and bored with him that she will divorce and deprive him of the matrimonial home and his children for no reason at all other than her boredom and irritation.

If Christianity had not already failed, the West would be full of Christian husbands and fathers in control of their families. Not for a moment would they suffer themselves to be treated like slaves and fungible commodities while those who come after them go to the head of the queue.

Make no mistake, the Feminist State has no intention of giving up Transnational Progressivism Transnational Progressivism however many elections are held and referenda conducted.

They have no intention of playing by the rules or sticking to it. Their idea of the rule of law is to shamelessly change the rules of the game while the game is still in play, to rig the outcome.

The beta male victim of feminism is also being censored and has no one to speak up for him. The men who could be his leaders are too busy looking after Number One to think of taking any risk or making any sacrifice on behalf of the beta male victims of feminism whose numbers daily increase.

In a matriarchy, all men are lower than the immoral woman who despises the men of her own race and nation and who has no intention whatsoever of ceasing the uncontrolled immigration that she knows upsets and distresses her menfolk more than they are legally allowed to say.

It is therefore ironic in the extreme then that I, a female and a racial foreigner, am the only person who has ever consistently warned and advised them in the strongest possible terms, at some risk and sacrifice to myself, but there it is: life is full of such surprises.

Alt-right YouTubers invite libertarian on their show. I am a libertarian theocrat prepared to have my ideas challenged.

I would like to discuss the following, which I think should be of interest to the alt-right:

Has Christianity failed?

If Christianity has not failed, why are most Westerners Post-Christians complaining about being exploited by Jews and invaded by Muslims?

Is it not obvious that religion is crucial to social cohesion and male solidarity enabling men to co-operate with each other to defend their nation against the eternal enemies of civilisation: sluts and socialists?

Is it not obvious that the purpose of patriarchy is to support marriage?

Marriage is the rearing of the next generation in optimum conditions, not something to be given to LGBT couples to use as a piece of paper to give to each other as love tokens to their current object of love.

Is it not obvious that patriarchy can only be supported by theocracy?

Only in a patriarchy would enough good strong men be produced to defend the national interest.

If you agree with me about the failure of Christianity, do you think it needs to be replaced?

If you agree with me that Christianity needs to be replaced, what do you think it should be replaced with?

If you disagree with me that the religion that should replace failed Christianity is Islam, then what do you think is the religion that should replace it?

Judaism?

Hinduism?

Buddhism?

Bahaiism?

Scientology?

Rastafarianism?

The worship of white Nordic gods?

The worship of Greek or Roman gods?

If  Islam is "Judaism Lite" and the thought of submitting to Islam is oppressive, this seems to suggest that Judaism would be much too hard for white nationalists.  After all, the Koran does not prescribe the death penalty for breaking the Sabbath.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Numbers+15%3A32-36&version=NKJV
http://biblehub.com/exodus/31-14.htm

Nor does the Koran prescribe the stoning of disobedient sons who are drunkards and gluttons.

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/rebellious-son

Islam is in fact the easier option. As long as we are clear about this.

If it is none of the above, then can I assume that you are planning to start a new religion?  If this is your plan, may I point out the following:

As we all know, Judaism - the first Abrahamic faith - has had its ups and downs: Jews have been kicked out of their homeland three times.  Also, it must be remembered that ancient of kingdom of Israel was in decline as soon as King Solomon died.

Christianity took about 350 years to be successful, from Christians being thrown to the lions and the Roman emperor Constantine converting to Christianity. Not having a plan means condemning your children, grandchildren and descendants to a New Dark Age of several centuries.

The Islamic empire was acquired with relatively ease, presumably because it seemed such an obviously good idea that the pagans of Arabia didn't fight that hard against it.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/history/earlyrise_1.shtml

Muslims are already here with their shops, post offices, mosques and curry restaurants everywhere in the UK as it is.

If Westerners want to reform Islam, then this can only be done by Westerners adopting Islam itself.

These are the points I would most like to discuss on these guys.

If you would like to my ideas being scrutinised and challenged by a panel of the alt-right, please make your feelings known to Mark Collett http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/ and the host at https://ask.fm/NoWhiteGuilt