Translate

Showing posts with label direct democracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label direct democracy. Show all posts

Friday, 26 August 2011

If Britain had been an Islamic state operating a system of direct democracy before WW2 Britain would not have lost its empire


Direct democracy is the only form of democracy worth discussing. That was the purest form of democracy as practised by the Ancient Greeks, and it is this version that the Koran recommends.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shura#cite_note-1

The Ancient Greeks voted on what laws to pass and what laws to repeal and whether to go to war.

Governments who consult the governed fare better than the rest because they can at least have a proper debate, take responsibility for whatever was decided and move on, while we cannot, because we feel abused, marginalised, ignored and betrayed.

Imagine, if the British had been asked about WW2, would Britain have lost its empire that was acquired with so much blood, sweat and tears by their ancestors?

But Churchill threw it all away because he wanted to be a war leader.

It was he who frittered away the inheritance of the British people.

When people like John Tyndall (who founded the BNP) complained with words to the effect after the war that Britain lost her empire for ignoble reasons and only gained the ignoble rewards of liberal decadence ie feminism, sexual licence, the emasculation and the disgusting feminisation of the white man and the uncontrolled immigration that would change the character of this nation forever, he was branded a Nazi and discredited by the liberal media.

After WW2 and after the loss of its empire, Britain could only comfort itself with the welfare state and the soft sweet luxuries of sexual liberation and easy divorce. But what did the welfare state that supported feminism and sexual licence do to the British ultimately?

The welfare state led to family breakdown, single parenthood, widespread illegitimacy, fatherlessness, ever lowering standards of education and morality, the worship of Mammon in the form of our sex and shopping society.

In short, the welfare state fueled by rampant consumerism created a culture of irresponsible borrowing and lending by government and individuals, the boom-bust cycle, all of which eventually led to the credit crunch affecting the entire Western world, who are now economically, morally bankrupt and heartily despised.

Perhaps it was ordained for the British to suffer the presence of Muslims, and to watch the people they regarded as a brown inferior race with a primitive religion surpass them in numbers, wealth and achievement in such a short space of time.

In the recent riots of England, whites joined in with the blacks to loot the shops of the browns, who are mostly the people these days who do any real business and who have property to protect.

It just shows you the strength and superiority of those who practise family values supported by marriage, compared to those once racially superior white affluent liberal atheists who thought they were above that sort of thing, but who are now effeminate reptiles and dogs, without honour and without shame, degraded and utterly contemptible in their cowardice and hypocrisy both in their domestic and foreign policy.

Imagine the kind of people who think the rest of the world is stupid enough to believe that they are invading another country for the good that country!   Their own people may be stupid enough to believe that, but it is sheer ignorance and arrogance to think others not subject to the British education system would be quite so susceptible to this sort of liberal claptrap.

Staggering, they will soon fall down on the pavement dead drunk, but not after vomiting and involuntarily defecating in the manner of drunks who really have had too much to drink, after all the partying they have had.  The rest of the world waits patiently, ready to kick their head in when this happens.

The lower the morals of women, the lower the morals of men.  And the morals of white working class slut, slag and slapper is very low indeed as they necessarily must be to have so many variously-fathered illegitimate children at the expense of the taxpayer in Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland.

Around half the children born in Britain are now born out of wedlock.

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23427447-more-than-half-of-all-british-babies-are-born-out-of-marriage.do

Think of how low the morals of the male political establishment must be, if they are afraid to criticise these sluts, slags and slappers who have variously-fathered bastards at the expense of the taxpayer.  It is no surprise that they do the things they now do in the world.  One can only hope that China and Russia eventually work up the courage to stop these fools and knaves in their tracks, with one neatly planted sucker punch, for the sake of world peace and to put an end to the toxic ideology of liberalism, which has delighted us for quite long enough.

Thursday, 21 April 2011

Secular Koranism

I would like it said that Secular Koranism is a novel and coherent fusion of atheism, agnosticism, monotheism, non-racist civic nationalism, libertarianism, direct democracy, Judaism, Christianity and Islam.

I would also it said that I am the High Priestess of Secular Koranism.   

Thursday, 21 January 2010

My solution to the Decline and Fall of British Civilisation

Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace or How We Came To Be So Hated by Gore Vidal explains how you have this thing called the American Constitution, the government flouts it and nobody notices or if they do, nobody cares.

Straying from the Koran - the Word of God that is meant to serve as a warning and a guide to all humanity, which is also much longer and more intimidating - must be a lot like that.

Britain needs a written constitution so if we do stray we will know how far, if anybody can still read by then.

But we are already mostly illegitimate, innumerate, illiterate, ignorant and arrogant. And we will just get worse.

Nobody listens to me, but my solution is to have all of us vote for a one-party state operating direct democracy under a narrower franchise.

I have even drafted a party constitution.

http://www.1party4all.co.uk/Home/Account/TopicForm.aspx?topicsId=107

Saturday, 11 July 2009

Direct Democracy = One Party State = Government of All Talents = National or Unity Government?

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/01/world/01zimbabwe.html?_r=1&ref=world

suggests that China is pleased that Zimbabwe is increasingly adopting its political system of a one-party state.

I like to think Mugabe was advised by China to give Tsvingirai a role in this new Unity Government or that he and his advisers cooked it up in the desire to sincerely flatter the Chinese with imitation.

It appears that our Frank Field is quite keen on the idea too, though he calls it a National Government.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/dec/08/government-debt-gilt-sales

Tory MP Douglas Carswell now speaks of "radical direct democracy" but does not appear to realise that government by referenda, without parties, is the logical conclusion of his not very radical proposals.

http://www.talkcarswell.com/show.aspx?id=751

A draft one-party state constitution can be found at

http://www.1party4all.co.uk/Home/Account/TopicForm.aspx?topicsId=107

If Britain's foreign policy of promoting the Special Relationship that is being America's Poodle is examined, it is simply because it just want to be best friends with the world's most powerful nation.

If that nation is no longer America, will Britain consider becoming a Pekingese?
If the British were to learn Chinese in its sink school state comprehensives, then it may be that its teaching establishment will have to acknowledge that there is no such thing as dyslexia, only defective and ineffective teaching methods, which would be A Good Thing.

The very nature of the Chinese language - which makes it such a horror to master - means that it cannot be properly learnt without using traditional teaching methods of rote learning, which the progressives have now completely abandoned in their ideological goal of securing equality of outcome, ie national innumeracy, illiteracy, illegitimacy, promiscuity, mediocrity, delinquency and decline.

Tuesday, 16 June 2009

Muslims and the Mainstream

I had a rather strained conversation with Tarik of MPACUK who was getting cross with me for going on about direct democracy.

a) He thought I was not taking no for an answer, which I guess is always annoying.

b) He must have been irritated that I thought that perhaps he did not understand what it was.

Having established that he did know what it was but still did not want it, I asked the reason why.

The answer was that Muslims want to integrate and did not want to ask for weird and wonderful things such as direct democracy, even if it is in accordance with Koranic principles, ie 3:159.

Annoyingly, because he was being rather cross with me, I forgot to ask him this:
Were direct democracy generally accepted by the majority, would Muslims like him embrace it?

Silly me, but he got me a bit flustered when he was being so snippy.

Perhaps I can get the answer from him one of these days, when he has gotten over his irritation with me.

I thought it was a very good sign of Muslims wishing to integrate, however, even if it does not suit my particular agenda, which is of course to popularise and universalise the appeal of direct democracy.

Monday, 25 May 2009

Alan Johnson calls for referendum on electoral reform

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2009/05/nadine-dorries-on-suicidal-mps.html

Wow. Everybody is getting on the direct democracy bandwagon.

There's Douglas Carswell talking about his "radical direct democracy" (that is not as radical as my corporate direct democracy of votes proportional to tax contribution of voter), and Zac Goldsmith of the Tories and his local democracy.

Then there is Frank Field talking about a national government, in effect a one-party state, which would be logically necessary to administer pure direct democracy.

Now Alan Johnson wants a referendum on electoral reform.

Well, well, well.

They should all have a look at www.1party4all.co.uk.

Wednesday, 15 April 2009

Tim Winter for Mufti!

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article1909809.ece

reports that British Muslims do not have a mufti and should have one. This was from a report in 2007, and it really is quite remiss of the Muslims not to have sorted that one out yet.

My preferred candidate is Tim Winter, whose voice I find guilt-inducingly thrilling.

The first time I heard his voice on Thought of the Day, I was lying in bed, but he woke me up good and proper, with his deep mellifluous tones speaking his exciting Islamic thoughts.

It looks as if it is now time to start a Tim Winter for Mufti campaign, when I already have so much on my plate, such as my flagging campaign to become Jury Team London MEP candidate.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mufti

To hear Tim Winter's thrilling voice and inspirationally Islamic thoughts, visit

http://www.platitudes.org.uk/platblog/index.php

and search for him under Shaikh Abdal Hakim Murad. There is the proper version and the satirical version, both of which are excellently wise and excellently funny.

A campaigning chant comes to mind:

Tim Winter for Mufti! Tim Winter for Mufti!

We need your views on Direct Democracy!

Sunday, 12 April 2009

Find me a Fatwa!

Those of you who know me will know that I have a bee in my bonnet about Direct Democracy.

I am now Jury Team MEP candidate at

http://www.juryteam.org/candidate-profile.php?id=10109

and receiving, I regret to report, not much support at all.

Perhaps I should take myself off to the nearest Easter Fair and sell kisses, or something, in exchange for a vote, costing no more than 25p and standard network charges for an SMS from your phone.

I then wondered whether Islamic scholars have a view on direct democracy and found this Find Me A Fatwa site at http://fatwaislam.com/

It calls itself "The Most Comprehensive Online Islamic Fatwa Guide" yet had nothing whatsoever on direct democracy.

I would like a fatwa from the Islamic scholar Tim Winter AKA Abdal Hakim Murad and wonder where I can go to order one.

Can one ask for one directly, or must one have an intermediary, analogous to going to a solicitor, who will in turn obtain Counsel's Opinion?

Does one have to be a Muslim to order one and will a fatwa fee be payable?

It appears not and is free, from

http://www.askimam.org/index.php

It is truly an excellent idea. Instead of agony aunts, the Muslims have agony uncles who are learned in the Koran. I have asked my question and can't wait to receive my answer, which should arrive in 3 days' time!

There is even a Fatwa Line at

0845 108 7799

which dispenses fatwas on Mondays to Thursdays between 12-1pm.

Saturday, 11 April 2009

Where are the leaders of the white people? asked Sayeeda Warsi

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/mar/28/cameron-conservatives-sayeeda-warsi

She says it's Labour's attitude to ethnic minorities that make her more aware than anything why she's a Tory. "I find their views quite uncomfortable. I was with Alan Johnson on Question Time, who's a lovely man, actually, and he was asking what the 'leaders of the Muslim community' felt and I said the Muslim community do not have leaders. What is this? Are we some kind of freak nation that bows down to our leaders? And he said the African-Caribbean community have their leaders and so and so have their leaders and I thought, I couldn't sit in a cabinet of people who still think like that; that somehow there are these alien groups in our nation, each of them represented by a leader who talked to the government on their behalf . It's almost the kind of approach of 'we know what's best for you brown people.' I find that patronising. On Question Time I said where are the leaders of the white people and they all went: 'er, let's move on'.

Wow. Is there a Sayeeda Warsi Fan Club I can join?

I wonder what she thinks of direct democracy, so we are not subject to the amoral decisions of any of our corrupt self-seeking leaders, just our consciences and our reason.

Perhaps Tim Winter AKA Abdal Hakim Murad can give us a fatwa on whether direct democracy could ever be unIslamic?

I would have thought the Koran's warning against people schismatically dividing themselves into sects and rejoicing in their own doctrines is a conclusive enough endorsement of government by referenda, by God Himself, if you believe in Him.

023.053

YUSUFALI: But people have cut off their affair (of unity), between them, into sects: each party rejoices in that which is with itself.

PICKTHAL: But they (mankind) have broken their religion among them into sects, each group rejoicing in its tenets.

SHAKIR: But they cut off their religion among themselves into sects, each part rejoicing in that which is with them.

045.017
YUSUFALI: And We granted them Clear Signs in affairs (of Religion): it was only after knowledge had been granted to them that they fell into schisms, through insolent envy among themselves. Verily thy Lord will judge between them on the Day of Judgment as to those matters in which they set up differences.


PICKTHAL: And gave them plain commandments. And they differed not until after the knowledge came unto them, through rivalry among themselves. Lo! thy Lord will judge between them on the Day of Resurrection concerning that wherein they used to differ.


SHAKIR: And We gave them clear arguments in the affair, but they did not differ until after knowledge had come to them out of envy among themselves; surely your -Lord will judge between them on the day of resurrection concerning that wherein they differed.

Wednesday, 4 June 2008

Six Steps to Being 4th Big Party of the "Right" by 2010

1. Read constitution at http://www.1party4all.co.uk/Home/Account/TopicForm.aspx?topicsId=107 to see if you agree that it confers more rights on its members than the current constitution of the BNP.

2. Agree that it would be nice to have a party with a constitution like that.

3. Form such a party.

4. Get everyone with a political view to join.

5. Once the party is big enough, invite anyone you would like to lead it to join and fight a leadership contest.

6. Campaign under this grassroots direct democracy party in the 2010 General Election, concentrate the protest vote and hold the balance of power!

Is this or is this not a cunning plan?

This idea is also being discussed at http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/british-politics-other-parties/50490-ukip-too-boring-bnp-too-dangerous-why-not-form-new-anti-eu-party.html#post509099

Monday, 17 September 2007

America's New French Poodle

Now that the Nicholas Sarkozy has supplanted Britain in its role as America's Poodle and is apparently calling for Iran to be bombed, that may just make the case for Direct Democracy more persuasive. I am sure the French have not suddenly decided to be war-mongers and in fact prefer their traditional role of remaining the cheese-eating surrender monkeys that Bush Jr has accused them of being.

However, this was the inevitable consequence of choosing any leader who wants a greater role on the world stage, who wants a diversion from the unglamorous domestic problems of putting one's own house in order. The French elected what they hoped would be a fiscally-responsible Conservative government who would cut red tape and lower taxes (unlike the British Conservative Party), but are now saddled with the role of being America's poodle - the furthest thing from their minds when they rejected Socialism.

I wonder how many Frenchmen are now uneasy about Sarkozy's intentions and whether they are happy to be seen in this role by the rest of the world. They have a significant Arab population. Can a French version of 7/7 can be that far away if Sarkozy persists in alienating Arab and Muslim opinion by siding with the most unpopular nation on earth - more unpopular even than Zimbabwe who at least oppresses only its own people?

Let us hope that China and Russia will have something to say about all this.

Rather than merely hope that there will be other powers strong enough to disagree with foreign policies that seems deliberately designed to start the Third World War, Direct Democracy would let the people decide. I do not say that world peace and brotherly love will reign through this system, merely that ordinary people would then be more able to make their feelings known on so many things that affect them which they are powerless currently to influence. Allowing them to do so would at least give a better indication of their approval or disapproval of government policies, and this can be the only way make responsive and accountable government more likely.

How many taxpayers would have voted to started the First World and Second World Wars if they had been asked?

Not only would it be a more sensitive barometer of the public opinion, its in-built Conservatism would balance the undeniable radicalism of letting taxpayers decide on all aspects of government policy while encouraging greater interest and participation by citizens in politics, which can only assist us in preventing the wool from being pulled over our eyes and cattle prods from being used against us when we do not agree with the government of the day.

God behaving badly

1:03:00  CLAIRE  KHAW joins to say God in the Koran is more reasonable than God in the Old Testament, but there is only one Abrahamic God.  ...