Preventing Child Indoctrination - Creating a better Education system

MY COMMENTS UNDER THE VIDEO

Are you all atheists?

Why is Mike Buchanan getting involved in covert displays of antisemitism and Islamophobia by banning male circumcision instead of campaigning to abolish no fault divorce?

If most British men were married fathers in control of their families, feminists would not have seized control of the educational system and would not now be indoctrinating British children with ways of having extramarital and underage sex as well as becoming members of the opposite sex.

Did anyone mention abolishing no fault divorce?

If none of you have any prospect of becoming fathers of legitimate children, what are the reasons?

Did anyone mention criminalising fornication to make men take marriage seriously again?

Do you realise that men who are considered unmarriageable are considered lower in status than married fathers of legitimate children?

Have you considered how and why Jewish and Muslim men are more likely to marry and stay married than atheist men?

In a matriarchy, women would control the educational syllabus. That is why public education is now institutional child sexual abuse. That is why primary school children are being given sex education and told they could become a member of the opposite sex if they seek treatment early enough, while they are adolescents, before they become adults.

Low status unmarriageable and atheist beta male victims of feminism who follow an angry bitter charmless man like Mike Buchanan who is more interested in showing covert hostility to Jews and Muslims by campaigning to ban male circumcision assisted by an unmarried mother rather than campaigning to abolish no fault divorce have no chance of overthrowing the matriarchy, have they?

Is the reason why no one is interested in abolishing no fault divorce conclusive evidence that you are all unmarriageable and therefore have no interest or prospect of getting married?  If this is so, then you are low status men. If you are indeed low status men, why would anyone listen to you?

Will Twitter allow me the right of pointing out that transwoman were in fact born male and may or may not still have a penis?

Transgender women are perceived as subversive to the matriarchy. They are men trying to claim the privileges of women using irrationality, emotionalism and subjectivity. #r4today

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 30, 2018

This is the sort of harassment I talk about. Reported and hopefully banned #r4today

— Xyr Coups (@xyr2000) May 30, 2018

I hope @TwitterSupport will note that *I* am being harassed for expressing a legitimate opinion.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 30, 2018

Your opinion is hateful towards a specific group of people though.

— James Riley (@JamesRiley18) May 30, 2018

What do you mean by "hateful"? I don't mind if people hate me. I do not forbid people from hating me nor do I wish to punish people from hating me as long as they do not commit crimes or illegal acts against me. After all, I believe in free speech!

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 30, 2018

You are the one censoring the free speech of women who only want to point out what is indisputably true.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 30, 2018

If the status of a claim is in dispute and the matter is gravely important, religious and political, then both points of views must be heard.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 30, 2018

I am all in favour of treating mental illness and in the state preventing it by supporting patriarchy and theocracy.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 30, 2018

On the real differences between the minds of men and women by J McGrigor Allan

http://www.jstor.org/tc/accept?origin=/stable/pdf/3025361.pdf

Who does woman the greater service? He who ignores, or he who remembers this important physiological distinction between the sexes?

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 2, 2018

If government depend solely on superiority in physical strength, why is man the
lord of creation? Why does the gorilla still lurk in the forests  of equatorial Africa, and not put in his claim to settle the affairs of Spain, or sit in Mr Gladstone's cabinet?

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 2, 2018

The functions of wife and mother are so essential, not only to the welfare but to the existence of the species,? So high and holy, that they cannot be abnegated or insufficiently discharged, without entailing the most disastrous consequences.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 2, 2018

ON FEMININE BEAUTY DISARMING MASCULINE AGGRESSION

"The beauty so liberally lavished on the female form (while it results directly from the adaptation of her structure to her special sexual functions,) is manifestly intended to charm and allure man so as to bring these functions into operation. Her indescribable graces, and the accomplishments of which her sex is exclusively susceptible, take captive her fierce conqueror, neutralising the otherwise disastrous consequences which might result from the weakness of woman, and the mere brutal strength of man. While woman yields in appearance, she disarms her would-be tyrant, and the weaker establishes a real and permanent supremacy over the stronger sex; not less real and permanent that it is continually and effectually disguised!"

IS THE SUPERIORITY OF MALE PHYSICAL STRENGTH OVER THE FEMALE THE REASON THEY CONTROL RESOURCES?

"Our sex, it is said, has used its only superior faculty, muscular strength, to trample upon woman? To deprive her of her rights? To treat her as a slave. This is the sort of stuff that goes down with mixed audiences, even in so-called semi-scientific societies. If government depend solely on superiority in physical strength, why is man the lord of creation? Why are we not ruled by lions, tigers, bulls, bears, elephants, and whales? Why does the gorilla still lurk in the forests of equatorial Africa, and not put in his claim to settle the affairs of Spain, or sit in Mr Gladstone's cabinet?"

THE SUPERIOR DISSIMULATION OF THE FEMALE SEX

" ... the profession of all others for which woman seems specially adapted is that of an actress! For this pursuit woman is qualified by natural instinct, and by that second nature, habit. Subjected all her life to a being mentally and physically stronger than herself, whose taste she must consult and whom she must study to please, striving continually to attain her ends by indirect means; to have her own way when she appears most willing to yield; to govern him whom she has solemnly sworn to obey, woman becomes gradually an adept in dissimulation. All women are more or less actresses! Shakespeare has, indeed, told us that we are all, men and women, players on the great stage of the world. It must be confessed that if we regard acting in this universal sense, man is here surpassed by woman. I admit that in the art of disguising her sentiments, passively appearing to be what she is not, and of actively personating the very opposite of what she really is, woman is far superior to man! Take lying, for instance : the worst of men often falters at telling a deliberate untruth ; if he does lie, he does it in such a clumsy way as to show that he is ashamed of the unmanly vice, and he is easily detected. I have heard a lady urge as a proof of men's stupidity, that they did not know how to dissimulate like women. I give this as evidence that the generality of women are perfectly aware, and derive a secret satisfaction from the conviction, that they circumvent men by cunning and deception, although they strenuously deny the fact. Their superiority in this respect is well expressed by Byron:

Now what I love in woman is, they won't

Or can't do otherwise than lie, but do it

So well, the very truth seems falsehood to it."

WOMEN AND JUSTICE

"Women are utterly deficient in the highest quality of the human mind? Justice I They never see two sides of a question : a woman makes a firm friend, an unrelenting enemy. In a lawsuit I should like for my advocate "a sweet girl-graduate with golden hair," who might gain my cause by making an impression on an intelligent British jury. But imagine a strong-minded female on the bench, summing up in a case of divorce, or in any case where the rights of the sexes were at variance ! Law would, indeed, have new terrors but I shall not pursue a subject which is too serious for a jest."

HOW FEMINISM LEADS TO TRANSGENDERISM

"As for some androgynists raving about woman's mission, intellectual equality, and moral superiority of woman, etc, it is quite evident that under the battle-cry of mental equality of the sexes, they are contending really for empire for themselves. They do not want to be treated on an equality with man. They desire the masculine in addition to the feminine privileges a man's liberty added to a woman's non-responsibility! They demand the rights of a citizen, knowing they cannot be called on to discharge a citizen's duties. They claim every privilege of man, while refusing to surrender a single privilege conceded to them as women! At the very instant that such a logical female declares herself the equal of man, she would resent as ungentlemanly, unmanly, cowardly, the attempt of any man to take her at her word, and treat her in every respect like one of his own sex. She is a stickler for all the courtesies and conventional amenities, which the stronger observes towards the weaker sex as a matter of course, and which depend solely on the inequality of the sexes, thus screaming in the same breath equality and inferiority! The masculine woman, when she thinks anything is to be got, cries out, "I am man's equal!" "There is no distinction between the sexes!" Indeed ! then turn out from the chimney-corner, lounge no longer on sofa or ottoman, but away into the world, and take your share, lady, in the rough work of men without fear or favour. Hear a lady, sheltered from cradle to grave, from all the storms which beat on the bare heads of millions of both sexes; housed, fed, clothed in luxury, zealously guarded from any unpleasant contact with the stern realities of life; hear such a lady regretting that she does not enjoy man's privileges! Let her disguise herself in man's apparel and learn what these privileges are. How glad she would be to return to her own costume ! The masculine woman takes good care to entrench herself in all the feminine outworks of propriety, civility, attention, gallantry, deference, and those still more solid exactions demanded by the sex in right of its weakness, and cheerfully paid by all gentlemen to all gentlewomen, who know how to make their sex respected. The nondescript androgynous creatures illustrate the fable of the jackdaw in peacock's feathers.

They want to usurp our sexual advantages without surrendering their own, and necessarily fail to achieve such an impossible combination. They want to be both men and women, and they are consequently neither the one nor the other."

Transgenderism and theocracy

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/dec/08/chelsea-manning-transgender-secret-us-army

Transgender people get forgiven more easily and get more rights, it seems. Isn't it interesting that transgender people are treated as if they are suffering from diminished responsbility?
There should be a pronoun for male to female transgender people (HMER) and another for female to male (HERM).

Chelsea Manning should be referred to as HMER.

Examples of Use

Q: Whose handbag is this?
A: It is HMERS.

Q: Whose Y-fronts are these?
A: They are HERMS.

Q: Who was the happy couple?
A: It was HMER and HERM.

Transgender people are mentally ill. Soon, they will make non-transgender people mentally ill too trying to correctly use the right pronoun and being sued, ostracised, sacked and perhaps even jailed over using the wrong pronoun.

It was feminism that declared men and women to be equal. This eventually made men want to cut off their penises to claim feminine privilege and get lots of sex without having to even buy a drink. Initially, women regarded this phenomenon as flattering, since it is obviously a big deal to cut off your penis to become a woman, and imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. This was eventually however resented by Arch-Feminists Germaine Greer and Julie Bindel who claimed that men cannot claim feminine privilege even if they feel themselves to be really women, wear women's clothes, or even if they looked like women. They were however condemned for being intolerant and transphobic. Now we see the children of the revolution being devoured by it.

But how did this lunacy start? By conceding the objective (having male or female sex organs) to the subjective (whether a person identifies as male or female) and having this reflected in official documents such as passports and birth certificates.

This has the consequence of confusing vulnerable adolescents who already have difficulty deciding who they are, could be or want to be by appearing to widen the range of possible identity options to such an extent that it was intellectually and emotionally disorientating and overwhelming. Imagine yourself sitting for a multiple choice examination when you expected to have only four options ie A to D to choose from, suddenly widened into A to Z, but to be completed in the same period of time. (It would be the same period of time because in real life we only have a limited lifespan to make what we can of our lives.) You would despair, wouldn't you, and then go mad and kill yourself probably.

Imagine also, how quickly you would go mad if every time you looked at yourself in the mirror it was always a different person looking back at you.

Imagine most men being househusbands staying safely at home painting their nails and going to the pub while women performed the worst and most menial heavy forms of manual work, being sewer workers and dustwomen, or dying in their millions on battlefields, utterly failing to rape and pillage the enemy and instead being captured and gang-raped themselves.

And so, that is my story of how and why the West went mad, and committed suicide.

That does not mean all Westerners will commit suicide and die, however, only their degenerate liberal democracy, which will be replaced by Islam, obviously. The opposite of this gender-confused and gender-confusing dementia is of course social conservatism, patriarchy, clearly demarcated gender roles for the purpose of efficiency and a general belief in God leading to the logical conclusion of a one-party theocracy led by an alpha male - like Donald Trump perhaps - that I have been advocating for years.