Secular Koranism loses an adherent because of its accommodation of LGBT

You would only get punished under Secular Koranism if you are:

1) an unmarried parent  quran.com/24/2

2) caught cottaging  quran.com/4/16

3) an incorrigible lesbian exhibitionist who has more than three witnesses to her lewd act with another woman  quran.com/4/15

https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2019/11/a-list-of-secular-koranists.html

Is Rabbi Gavriel Krausz the exemplar of Jewish masculinity?

Rabbi: Jews Should Choose Death Over Allowing LGBTQ Lessons in School

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiddush_Hashem

Is this a demonstration of Jewish masculinity, if masculinity is defined as a state of mind prepared to defend patriarchal moral values?

Patriarchal moral values are of course laws and rules of behaviour that would support the patriarchy.

Patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers and marriage is clearly the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy. You cannot have married fathers without marriage, can you?

Feminism promotes gender equality.

Gender equality causes gender confusion.

Gender confusion causes gender dysphoria.

Gender dysphoria causes people to want to mutilate their sex organs and sterilise themselves, thereby taking more men out of circulation in the competition to become married fathers.

Degenerate bastardy and the distractions of LGBT sex is what the matriarchy - which feminism has created - promotes.

Everything about feminism undermines marriage and feminists have long declared that it is their intention to destroy the patriarchy, which they also equate with domestic violence.

Matriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers who casually conceived and casually parented their illegitimate offspring.

In a matriarchy, all men are lower in status than unmarried mothers and this includes POTUS and the late Jewish baronet Keith Joseph who spoke against unmarried mothers "destroying our human stock" in 1974.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron

All advanced civilisations are patriarchies.

All primite, declining, extinct and soon to be extinct societies are matriarchies. The Native American ran his society as a matriarchy.

The matriarchy is dangerous, even to itself because it creates a burgeoning parasitic class that will devour the productive in society. When the productive elements of society have been devoured, the parasites will consume each other.

No good will come out of feminism and no good has come out of feminism unless a satanic culture of extramarital sex and underage sex is considered to be a good thing together with a culture of consumerism. Transnational Progressivism AKA globohomo is the moral sewage that is being pumped out from the Occident to the Orient. And all this because Jews have been neglecting their duty to promote the Noahide laws in the gentile nations they reside in. Is America with its global empire a Noahide nation? Chabad seems to think it is.

When the West awakes from its dementia and catatonia, it will awaken Muslim.

Secular Koranism will ease its transition from Post-Christian to Muslim.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

Making the period of transition from matriarchy to patriarchy as smooth and bloodless as possible

For some reason, many people hear about deconstruction and they acquire only a few particular targets: traditional marriage, dead white male books, or whatever. And all that is fine... but there is so much more fun to be had now. Yes, marriage was just a social construct. But 1/

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

...so are the days of the week and the weekend and months. Let’s shake things up! Why are we dating things from the time of Jesus? Start over at year zero. We’re deconstructionists. Let’s enjoy this. Deconstruction &traditionalism thread — 2/ ...

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

There are silly ways we could play around — switching which side of the road we drive on. But let’s be honest, there are very controversial ways! If marriage is a social construct, the age of consent is absolutely a social construct. In most of Mexico it’s 12. Is that bad? 3/...

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

...who is to say, right? We’re deconstructionists. We can change the rules of the NFL so that it’s inclusive of women. Keep reading. Let’s have a random computer algorithm redraw the national boundaries around the world. Those are constructs! 4/...

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

Democracy certainly is a social construct. We should play around and try lots of different forms like anarchy capitalism and strict patriarchal Catholic imperium and everything in between. And it’s a social construct that men ask women out & not vice versa. Let’s reverse that! 5/

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

Obviously “education” is a social construct. Even the disciplines are constructs. Property ownership is a construct. Voting age is a construct. Anti-cousin marriage taboos, the movie rating system—all constructs. I know you all know all of this — 6/

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

Legalize prostitution and drugs. Make pornography and coffee illegal. We are masters of the universe and everything is arbitrarily arranged! Why are we so conservative in our deconstruction? The Constitution, the Bible, The Odyssey — all constructs. Let’s revise. 7/

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

Is hitting children acceptable? Who is to say? The DSM-V is a construct, and we should play around and revise all of its arbitrary distinctions. Again, why are we so conservative? Is usury acceptable or not? Construct. Why should pop songs be 3 minutes? Why not 30 seconds? 8/

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

Dismantle all standardized testing, right? And it’s not fair that some universities are prestigious and others aren’t. Admissions should be by lottery cuz no person is better than any other. Political correctness and “hate speech” rules are constructs! Point is... 9/

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

...once you start dismantling traditions, it’s a race to absolute zero. There’s no solid metaphysical basis for retaining any of our cherished taboos now. Back to age of consent: we say 18. Mexico says 12. There is no way of settling this. some secular pope makes judgment call. +

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

Until we arrive at total anarchy. Which seems to be the direction we’re headed. Against all of this—against this acid that eats away at all value, we have traditional values, which are said to be permanent and stable. And which “worked”—not perfectly, but reliably, for millennia.

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

What honestly surprises me is the way that so many people genuinely cannot play this narrative out in their heads. They go, “yeah, we normalized usury and revised the Latin mass and legalized gay marriage and so on and so on, but don’t think we’ll ever lower age of consent...”

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

And they go, “...and legalizing gay marriage isn’t even comparable to making the week 10 days long.” But of course it is. And when they go, “Yeah but legalizing SSM is *good*,” — it’s not that I think it’s bad. It’s that there is no basis for saying whether it’s good or bad.

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

It’s just an arbitrary whim. Like everything is now. And they counter, “well, ‘twas ever so—traditional marriage was also just arbitrary.” And this is the part I’m not sure about. Maybe they’re right. Or maybe certain traditional “conventions” actually reflected some realities?

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

Think of it like a golf swing: should we teach children that the golf swing is an arbitrary motion? Merely a construct? I mean, look at gym Furyk. Try it one-handed, kid. Who are we to say? We’re deconstructionists.  We don’t want to oppress you with traditionalism.

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

But the golf swing achieves a particular end—and many of its standard forms are thought to beat achieve that end. Should it be illegal to do it wrong? Probably not. But should we clearly instruct children in what grip and motions generally work best? So is a golf swing...

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

“a social convention” or not? Possibly not. Possibly it is a reflection of our physiology and of physical reality. How much more, then, might marriage or taboos on sex or age of consent laws be not arbitrary, but aligned to certain really-existing unavoidable realities?

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

Does deconstruction have limits? Well, the classic/traditional golf swing might not work best for a severely mutilated person... or on the moon? —and so if the body itself can be deconstructed, or laws of nature, then maybe deconstruction has no limits.

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

But it’s also possible that the combo of our bodies, our brains, natural reality itself, hormones, etc. — that this adds up to a set of constraints. And that something like traditional marriage might even be the “best form” for managing these realities.

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

—and marriage is, again, merely an early indicator of how deconstruction will operate. Why should the week have seven days? Is that arbitrary? Or maybe our physiology and our minds need a weekend every 7 days or so? Maybe there would be consequences for screwing up the calendar?

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

What a lot of words to just say "Restore the patriarchy to save your civilisation."

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 28, 2018

I'm an academic, Claire. I can't say that!

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

You could ask the following questions:

1) Is marriage is the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy?
2) Is the West now a matriarchy?
3) Do all civilisations rise in patriarchy and decline in matriarchy?
4) Is matriarchy a society that tolerates a culture of fornication?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 28, 2018

Claire!! -- you can't use words like "fornication" in academic circles. Please say "liberated consensual sex." 🤪

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

5) Is a patriarchy a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers?
6) Is a matriarchy a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers who are invariably the bad parents of their often variously fathered illegitimate offspring?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 28, 2018

7) Are the problems of the West really problems of character, parenting and its egregiously low standards of sexual morality (which is in fact dysgenic) as well as the failure of its religion and political system which no one will acknowledge?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 28, 2018

8) Is it true that Western men are afraid of Western women withholding sex from them or divorcing them under the rules of no fault divorce, so much so that they are in fact too afraid to criticise feminism even as they see it destroying the civilisation their ancestors created?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 28, 2018

(but while I *personally* disavow, and can't safely RT, I would love to see you do some interviews with some basic/progressive academics)

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

Can you find any who would be prepared to appear on my channel?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 28, 2018

No, I don't think I can. I'm afraid to ask some of them cuz they might report me to the ADL just for proposing it. Others wouldn't dare, because they know (deep down) that they have no idea what basis they have for their own claims. Others aren't smart enough. Etc. But I'll look-

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

How about asking in academic circles if restoring is the patriarchy is the only way to save Western civilisation?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 28, 2018

Academics are 100% certain that patriarchy is the enemy. So you'd have to first show them that their classification of good & evil, justice & injustice, have been either wrong or totally arbitrary... all that, just to get them to consider it. Right now, they're not considering.

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

They seem to equate patriarchy with domestic violence and wife-beating. Let us assume that if most women are married then they would be more likely to be beaten by their husbands than anyone else. However, would they prefer to be raped by marauding soldiers/invaders instead?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 28, 2018

Here's a common style of argument: "What, you reject basic LGBT civil rights legislation? And now feminism? Then do you also reject anti-slavery? Should there be inquisitions again?"

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

I am getting more serious about the Bible. The breastplate of Christ. Eventually progressives will of course categorize it as hate speech, but... I think it provides cover for a generation or two.

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

You are going back to something that has already failed, I am afraid.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 28, 2018

i think we're in far enough that the only way out is through... meaning acceleration, basically. Get to the end, then we can start again. Or at least, that's the only contribution I can make in academia. To try to show people how hollow their assumptions are, as Socrates did.

— cdotpratt (@cdotpratt1) December 28, 2018

If we have offspring, surely it is our duty to make the period of transition as smooth and bloodless as possible? This we can do by pointing to the problem and proposing the solution. https://t.co/hqBLWTbJJ0 is an example of a solution.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 28, 2018

Even if the most we can do is say "I told you so" when the balloon goes up, we can at least truthfully say that we did tell them so thereby retaining some moral authority. If we only stood idly by and said nothing, we will have no moral authority at all and be rightly ignored.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 28, 2018

Preventing Child Indoctrination - Creating a better Education system

MY COMMENTS UNDER THE VIDEO

Are you all atheists?

Why is Mike Buchanan getting involved in covert displays of antisemitism and Islamophobia by banning male circumcision instead of campaigning to abolish no fault divorce?

If most British men were married fathers in control of their families, feminists would not have seized control of the educational system and would not now be indoctrinating British children with ways of having extramarital and underage sex as well as becoming members of the opposite sex.

Did anyone mention abolishing no fault divorce?

If none of you have any prospect of becoming fathers of legitimate children, what are the reasons?

Did anyone mention criminalising fornication to make men take marriage seriously again?

Do you realise that men who are considered unmarriageable are considered lower in status than married fathers of legitimate children?

Have you considered how and why Jewish and Muslim men are more likely to marry and stay married than atheist men?

In a matriarchy, women would control the educational syllabus. That is why public education is now institutional child sexual abuse. That is why primary school children are being given sex education and told they could become a member of the opposite sex if they seek treatment early enough, while they are adolescents, before they become adults.

Low status unmarriageable and atheist beta male victims of feminism who follow an angry bitter charmless man like Mike Buchanan who is more interested in showing covert hostility to Jews and Muslims by campaigning to ban male circumcision assisted by an unmarried mother rather than campaigning to abolish no fault divorce have no chance of overthrowing the matriarchy, have they?

Is the reason why no one is interested in abolishing no fault divorce conclusive evidence that you are all unmarriageable and therefore have no interest or prospect of getting married?  If this is so, then you are low status men. If you are indeed low status men, why would anyone listen to you?

If you live in Reading and are appalled at the way modern religious leaders condone sodomy and other sexual offences, please be there to stand up for your religious principles

https://www.facebook.com/ZviSolomons/posts/10155168481996406?comment_id=10155173099976406&reply_comment_id=10155177483881406&notif_id=1519728081400529&notif_t=feed_comment_reply&ref=notif
Please do have a look at the arguments for and against being accommodating towards those the Bible and the Koran would regard as sex offenders. This rigged debate will only have one outcome: more legitimacy for sex offenders and the marginalisation of those who wish to defend marriage and restore patriarchy. Why is an Orthodox Rabbi participating in this disgraceful exercise of diluting the principles of Judaism and being accommodating to unashamed sodomites scripture would treat as sex offenders who worship themselves? Is he under duress? Do all Jews, however Orthodox, feel they have to assimilate into the degenerate culture of sexual liberation? Should Jews apologise to gentiles for not being fit for the purpose of reminding gentiles of the Seven Noahide laws, or should gentiles apologise to Jews for having utterly corrupted the morals of Jews?

https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/reading-lgbt-debate-is-there-a-space-for-lgbt-in-religion-tickets-42219406381

http://www.readinglgbt.co.uk/?event=reading-lgbt-debate-is-there-a-space-for-lgbt-in-religion

27/02/2018
7:00 pm - 10:00 pm
On the evening, the front doors to the Council may be closed, please use the buzzer to the left of the door and inform security that you are attending the debate in the Mayors Parlour.
Civic Offices
Bridge Street
Reading
RG1 2LU

Simon Sheppard arrested under the Terrorism Act 2000 and the trouble with the alt-right of Britain

TOPICS DISCUSSED IN THIS VIDEO BY JEZ TURNER

http://www.heretical.com/

Sheppard's current research is medical and involves a compound that is applied to the skin. It was going very well until he was arrested on suspicion of making racially aggravated complaints about an African the Council has moved in nearby. Seeing his equipment and materials, he was re-arrested under the Terrorism Act 2000. There is video somewhere of his area flooded with blue lights, while Sheppard was held under 24-hour watch. His computers have been taken away again.

Jez didn't mention the letter containing the Balfour Declaration at Waddesdon. (It was just a non-committal thank you letter from Arthur Balfour to Lord Rothschild for his donation to the Conservative Party, hardly a testament signed in blood.)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/theatre/theatre-reviews/7325440/The-Promise-at-the-Orange-Tree-Theatre-review.html

The Rothschilds never lived there, which is why it feels unlived in.  It was their "country cottage".

I wouldn't interpret the presence of Joshua Reynold's Thais as evidence that Jews want to destroy the West, let me be clear! 

http://collection.waddesdon.org.uk/search.do?id=41445&page=1&view=detail

Joshua Reynolds turned this portrait of Emily Bertie Pott into a grand history painting by combining portraiture, classical literature and social comment. Thaïs famously encouraged Alexander the Great to burn the Palace of Persepolis. In the 18th century, she was associated with women like Emily, an infamous mistress of Charles Greville. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tha%C3%AFs

Burning of Persepolis
Thaïs apparently came from Athens and accompanied Alexander throughout his campaign in Asia Minor. She came to the attention of history when, in 330 BC, Alexander burned down the palace of Persepolis, the principal residence of the defeated Achaemenid dynasty, after a drinking party. Thaïs was present at the party and gave a speech which convinced Alexander to burn the palace. Cleitarchus claims that the destruction was a whim; Plutarch and Diodorus recount that it was intended as retribution for Xerxes' burning of the old Temple of Athena on the Acropolis in Athens (the site on the extant Parthenon) in 480 BC during the Persian Wars.

Jez Turner: "Liberalism caused Islam."
How did liberalism cause Islam? Or do you mean feminism and Western government policy caused immigration and Islamophobia?

UKIP leadership election

 Jez supports Anne Marie Waters, I support John Rees-Evans, Arron Banks supports David Kurten.

Joshua Bonehill's new prison (non-smoking) address

Joshua Bonehill A5933DM
HMP Guys Marsh
Shaftesbury
Dorset
SP7 0AH

Immigration

Liberals snobbishly think it beneath them to admit to being affected by the same things that adversely affect the indigenous proletariat.  I have concluded that the problem is really social snobbery and the operation of the English class system. If the ruling classes were antisemitic, sexist and racist, the sheeple and the political establishment would also be unquestioningly antisemitic, sexist and racist too as indeed they once were. At the end of the day, most members of society are sheeple and only a very small minority are capable of independent thought, and this includes nationalists and members of our political establishment who are exemplars of mediocrity, cowardice and hypocrisy. It is always from this minority that our future leaders will come from.

Transgenderism condemned

Meet Dr Victoria McCloud, UK’s First Ever Transgender High Court Judge  http://www.vagabomb.com/Victoria-McCloud-UKs-First-Ever-Transgender-High-Court-Judge/

Britain no longer a Christian country

Why does Jez say the Church of England stopped being Christian 100 years ago? I would say it stopped being Christian about 200 years ago.  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/victor-shannock-catholic-says-all-who.html

Jews and modern architecture

Is it quite fair to blame Jews for the soul-destroying uniformity and brutality modern architecture? https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2014/06/the-jews-who-designed-the-american-home/372208/

Russian Revolution: Hope, Tragedy, Myths
Open until Tue 29 Aug 2017 https://www.bl.uk/events/russian-revolution-hope-tragedy-myths?gclid=CjwKCAjw47bLBRBkEiwABh-PkSeX97kR-wxpUxolZ3QbuVP78Quwk6R2TXwwogmuvflRItw4Im-JrxoCLEgQAvD_BwE

The oft-repeated accusation of Jews feeding gentiles the poison of liberalism is repeated here. Let me make it clear that while I have the greatest respect for the religion of God's Chosen People, I do not see that they should escape criticism and mockery from gentiles altogether.

It is of course the fact that the gentile in his own land cannot mock Jews that is responsible for so much antisemitism in the West.

While Jews suffer from the temptation of the strong and clever in bullying and exploiting the weak and stupid, I feel gentiles have to take some responsibility for their own predicament. Even if the Jew were always offering cups of poison to the gentile, there is still no reason for the gentile to always accept it and drink from it quite so eagerly and quickly.

Jews who urge feminism on the deranged and gullible gentile are never observant and orthodox Jews, are they?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah

Should any tribe be judged by the worst of its criminal members?

Can it not be argued that the matriarchy of the West has itself corrupted the morals of the Jews?

If the unscrupulous and immoral use the vulnerabilities of our irrational political system and immoral political ideology against us, shouldn't we take some responsibility for this for using such a rotten system and being fixated on an erroneous ideology because we are too proud, afraid or lazy to question it?

https://quran.com/2/170

Is there something in the culture and politics of the gentile Westerner - some unpatched vulnerability in his software - that makes him particularly susceptible to these temptations to vice and degeneracy?

Very disappointingly, Jez does not discuss feminism at all.

There are some who blame Jews for feminism and use as authority for this proposition that prominent feminists are Jewesses, but I question this. Clever people are invariably attracted to politics and Jews being a superior race (because they have kept their traditions by caring whom they marry unlike the modern and degenerate gentile who no longer practises marriage) are a clever, tenacious and cohesive people who have risen to prominence because they are superior in talent and culture. What does not kill you makes you stronger, after all. Judaism is for Jews only, because it is so high maintenance that no gentile wants to be burdened by its practice unless s/he is lucky enough to find a Jew prepared to marry him or her and because of this have to convert.

If Islam is "Judaism Lite", then Secular Koranism is "Islam Lite". Both Judaism and Islam require from its adherents observance and practice of their traditions while Christianity only requires that Christians tell the lie that they believe in the absurdity of the Trinity, namely that they believe that Christ is simultaneously God Himself and His Son.

In our age of universal education, requiring belief in the Trinity as an article of Christian faith is now too much to ask, which is why the demand is no longer made.

Congregations are made to repeat the Nicene creed uncomprehendingly at church services, and this will have to do as lip service to the creed. Christian fundamentalists understand the nature of this corrupt bargain but cultural Christians do not, because this demand was never made of them, and few people who call themselves Christians were actually confirmed in adolescence.

For this reason, Christian principles have been progressively diluted and this explains why Christianity is now indistinguishable from liberalism. Christianity has failed Westerners, because they are now infected by the virus of feminism which will destroy even their desire to be cured from it.

They are suffering from a kind of dementia, it seems, so debilitating that most of the alt-right seem to be of the mind that they do not want a leader, and refuse to discuss this any further. They do not want a leader because they wish to escape the trouble and inconvenience of being led, because being led implies an arduous journey that they do not wish to embark upon, for they are desirous of staying at home in order to make their alt-right YouTube videos complaining about Jews, Muslims and immigration without ever lifting a finger to propose a practical political solution. Most of their videos consist of a daydream of a post-pogrom all-white West some indefinite time in the future. They do not want a leader because they do not wish to experience again the disappointment of being betrayed by their inadequate and dishonourable leaders, and they have all been inadequate and dishonourable. 

This neatly explains why I am denied a platform by the alt-right who are the intended beneficiaries of Secular Koranism. http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

The sad fact is that Western Man is now so emasculated by feminism that he now behaves like a woman.

Men often complain about women who tell them their problems and who become offended when a practical solution is offered. In reality, all the complaining woman wanted was your attention, your sympathy and your shoulder to cry on. She does not really want to leave her husband, break up with her boyfriend or change her job, because complaining about it with your attentive sympathy is enough to stop her from doing any of those things, for now.

The alt-right have become the woman who is offended because you have presented them with the solution that they do not wish to go to the trouble of implementing.

As Livy said, "We can neither bear our vices, or the cure for them."

The cure is patriarchy reinforced by a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism, and this none of them can bear to hear, because it means they have to reconsecrate marriage and punish extramarital sex.

Even in a patriarchy married sex is the most expensive form of sex, and most of these men know they are poor and unmarriageable. The prospect of fornicating with a fornicatress is the opium of what passes for their "religion". The idea of getting sex from a prostitute is probably too uncomfortable and expensive for them.

I am not so out of touch that I do not know why they detest my cure. Indeed, I have been told that my cure is worse than the disease, as Livy hinted.

All this has happened before, and it will happen again. The Chinese even have a term for it: Yin and Yang which explains the eternal battle of the sexes.

Denial is a feminine vice and the men of the alt-right have become women in denial. 

Jews are also victims of the matriarchy

Feminism causes anti-Semitism (as well as degeneracy, dementia, immigration and paedophilia)

Pankaj Mishra's Age of Anger does not mention how feminism makes men of all races angry 

 Rabbi Sacks on why a weak sense of identity makes formerly Christian gentile Westerners angry and frightened. Jews never lost their traditions and identity because their religion itself is about  reminding them of their identity, which is why they remain the most cohesive and powerful of tribe of all the tribes of the world, even as they lived in gentile lands after being expelled from Israel by the Romans all those centuries ago. 

"Out of the corruption of women proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil."

The role of intersectional feminism

Intersectional feminism protects bottom barrel people with victim muscles to flex in the inverted hierarchy of our degenerate matriarchy. Intersectional feminism is the acquisition, measurement and competition to deviate as much as possible from the ideal of being an alpha male. It is the systematic cultivation of failure by those who wish to undermine patriarchy and civilisation.

Questions I was asked about feminism

Q.  Why are you not a feminist?

A.   Because I am not immoral, evil, selfish, stupid and irrational. Feminism encourages women to be promiscuous women and such women should be discouraged for the good of your civilisation and the long term national interest. All feminists assume the right of women to have premarital sex and these promiscuous women are the soldiers of feminism who corrupt the morals of men by bribing them with fornication. The conquest is now successful and complete. You won't find a single senior white Western male politician prepared to uncompromisingly support marriage. Not even won't senior politicians discuss this, no senor academic will discuss this either, and certainly no senior nationalist.

These pathetic white nationalist men who complain about being exploited by Jews and invaded by Muslims are actually too afraid to marry women of their own race because they know the rules of no fault divorce would financially eviscerate them the moment their wife is bored or irritated, or has a political disagreement with their husbands.

Q.  What do you think about patriarchy?

A.  All advanced civilisations are patriarchies, all declining and primitive societies are matriarchies. Why would someone who lives in an advanced civilisation want to live in a primitive society or be degenerate? Only the degenerate. I don't want to be degenerate.

They could be talking about the abolition of no fault divorce or why marriage is eugenic and bastard dysgenic, but they prefer to blame Jews and Muslims who piss on them from on high that they are too venal and sex-addicted to give up because they already know they are unmarriageable and are too atomised to co-operate with each other to organise a revolution or an effective political movement.

Having just seen how Trump has utterly betrayed them, they have had the stuffing knocked out of them, yet again.

They also know they are all beta males and no beta male will accept the authority of another beta male.

These arrogant fuckers just won't accept that they need a religion with patriarchal moral values that supports the institution marriage and think they can get what they want (ie a pogrom against Jews and Muslims and immigrants) without this.

Most of them just hope to die before Western civilisation as they know it collapses anyway.

http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=13&verse=11

God will not change the lot of a people until they change what is in their hearts, says this verse.

What are in the hearts of these degenerate atheist fucktards?

They want to remain MCSFs till the day they die. So sad, when many of them are obviously no longer even sexually active. http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/all-spossms-are-mcsfs-but-not-all-mcsfs.html

So, while they remain in denial in the hope of fucking promiscuous women, or wanting to avoid offending them because these promiscuous women are their daughters, sisters, grandmothers etc, things will continuing going from bad to worse till Western civilisation as we know it collapses.

Q.  What do you think about intersectionality?

A.  Intersectionality is about the acquisition of victimhood as a means of achieving status in a degenerate and declining society. It is a feminine stratagem and useful only for this purpose when your society is already a stinking degenerate matriarchy on its way to hell in a handcart and accelerating fast.

Q. What do you think about rape culture?

A.  As I understand it, the term "rape culture" is about not asking obvious questions of the complainant as to how she came to be raped, as she alleged. Was she drunk? Was she silent and thus indicating consent as her alleged rapist had intercourse with her? Did she by her behaviour indicate that her alleged rapist had reasonable grounds for thinking she was consenting? What was she wearing? If she objected to having sex, why didn't she struggle? The defence is no longer allowed to ask these questions.

Q.  What do you think about objectification?

A.  You mean women as sex objects? Men want to have sex with women, and women want men to give them stuff in return. This is the way of the world.

Q.  What do you think about cat calling?

It is how lower class men indicate their appreciation of a woman's attractiveness when they are in groups.

Q.  What do you think about slut shaming/sex positivity?
A.  Obviously, fornicatresses who are promiscuous women must be shamed to discourage women from being and becoming fornicating promiscuous women and adulteresses. That is the only way to eradicate feminism. Emasculated men enfeebled by half a century of being breast fed premarital sex won't get it together to comprehensively denounce this or uncompromisingly support marriage. It would be like expecting the most degraded drug addict to call the cops on his dealer. That is why a big new idea is necessary to galvanise these degenerate enfeebled emasculated beta male victims of feminism. It is probably too late for them now anyway, but for the sake of good order I will continue to keep pointing this out.

Q.  What do you think about lgbt issues?

A.  LGBT sex is a category of extramarital sex that the Koran forbids.

https://quran.com/4/15

https://quran.com/4/16

Q.  What do you think about minority rights issues?

A.  I think we should be focusing on what form the *dominant culture* should now take. That is the real question. I am interested in being part of the dominant culture and being one of the people who had a hand in the formation of the new dominant culture.

Q.  What do you think about gender discrimination?

A.  We should expect it since everyone exercises it.

Q..  What do you think about misogyny/misandry?

A.  Men and women who have had bad experiences and relationships with the opposite sex will feel bitter and angry. This is less likely to occur in a patriarchy than in the stinking degenerate matriarchy that we have now.

Q.  What do you think about anti feminism/MRAs/MGTOW?

A.  MGTOW is part of the matriarchy.

The only way to solve the problem of feminism is to re-establish the patriarchy.

The only way to re-establish the patriarchy is to see to it that most members of society practise marriage and respect its rules ie no extramarital sex (and this includes premarital and gay sex).

MGTOW not marrying would just exacerbate the degeneracy of criminal bastards who will soon become the majority, making society even more criminal and chaotic.

MRAs who still don't understand this are being willfully blind because they don't want to grasp the nettle of denouncing promiscuous fornicatresses because they want to have sex with women without marrying with them or paying for a prostitute.

Q. What do you think about men's issues?

A. Beta male victims of feminism clearly have many issues with feminism and I have already proposed that it be eradicated with Secular Koranism, because I can't quite see any other system of rules with sufficient moral authority being strong enough to do the job.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

Being gay is synonymous with being a fanatical follower of the Cult of Youth

A Facebook friend posts in his group at https://www.facebook.com/groups/632974580194337/permalink/780665425425251/?comment_id=788496897975437&reply_comment_id=788675441290916&notif_t=group_comment&notif_id=1489521646499529:

Two of my gay male friends are turning 40 this week and they are really depressed about it.

I think it is really hard for us gay men to embrace getting older.
 
For straight people, getting older is usually interwoven with having children and then grandchildren, which brings with it a great deal of joy and fulfillment, but for gay people like myself, the future can often seem empty, lonely and bleak.
 
Discuss.

My response:

Your concerns bring to the fore very starkly the shallowness of a gay and transgender life. It's all about looks. Once you lose them you might as well kill yourselves. This is probably why so many transgender and gay people do start killing themselves in their 40s.

Age is not respected in the LGBT community.

The greatest tragedy is to grow old without growing wise. 

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/oliver-burkeman-column/2015/may/12/the-cult-of-youth-cheats-young-and-old-alike-lets-reclaim-adulthood

an infantilized population mesmerized by “a wealth of small decisions” – what brand of washing-machine to buy? – is much easier for governments and corporations to control. “The picture of growing up as inevitable decline is supported by a web of interests that operate against our coming of age,” Neiman writes. “The tragedy is the way that we constantly collude in it.” Refusing to grow up may be a form of rebellion. But really growing up could be a revolution. 

The LGBT Agenda has Paved the way for the Normalisation of Paedophilia

Nick Griffin and the problem with the BNP

https://t.co/o38QBLjZK1 Nick Griffin talks of nationalists not being prepared to become fathers/being weak against homosexuality. 34th min

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/o38QBLjZK1 Nick Griffin proposes a bachelor tax. 42nd minute

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/X0kEv1jhiH Nick Griffin starts off talking about Nigel Farage's Eurosceptic credentials, UKIP history/strategy/media coverage.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/X0kEv1jhiH Nick Griffin: Swedish Democrats another Zionist front group. 14th minute

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/X0kEv1jhiH Nick Griffin mentions Black Hawk Dawn. Hollywood wants European Jews to die like men for Israel. 18th minute

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/X0kEv1jhiH Nick Griffin: Without Jim Dowson's guidance, it is possible Britain First may be led down neocon route. 28th minute

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/X0kEv1jhiH Nick Griffin: Paul Golding of Britain First "very brave but not brain of Britain". 28th minute

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/X0kEv1jhiH Nick Griffin: Patrick Harrington is not a member of the BNP but basically runs it. 31st minute

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/X0kEv1jhiH Nick Griffin explains why he chose to surround himself with Adam Walker and Clive Jefferson. 33rd minute

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/X0kEv1jhiH Nick Griffin gets pocket money from his wife like a schoolboy who cannot be trusted to manage his money. 34th min

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/X0kEv1ASaf Nick Griffin praises Clive Jefferson for being good with getting the accounts ready on time. 36th minute

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/X0kEv1jhiH Nick Griffin: Getting BNP de-registered a deliberate ploy to avoid having to waste money on elections. 36th minute

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/X0kEv1jhiH Nick Griffin: London is such a "demographic shambles" it is not even worth contesting an election there. 36th min

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/X0kEv1jhiH Nick Griffin's message to those who still genuinely believe in the BNP: "Wise up." 37th minute

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/X0kEv1jhiH Nick Griffin: No point BNP fighting any election because it will be rigged. 37th minute

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/X0kEv1jhiH When Nick Griffin was expelled from the BNP, it was sitting on £10M's worth of bequests. 37th minute

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/X0kEv1jhiH Nick Griffin: BNP vulnerable to infiltration from crooks as well Reds, Jews and the police. 38th minute

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/X0kEv1jhiH Nick Griffin: We have the most corrupt electoral systems in the world. 39th minute

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/X0kEv1jhiH Nick Griffin describes Clive Jefferson as a crook and a very sharp operator. 42nd minute

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/X0kEv1jhiH Nick Griffin: Adam Walker is brave, good looking and has a nice voice. 43rd minute

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/X0kEv1jhiH Nick Griffin describes Adam Walker as an "amiable idiot" whose North Eastern accent trusted and liked. 45th minute

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/X0kEv1jhiH Before his expulsion by Clive Jefferson, Nick Griffin was shut out of his own Twitter account. 47th minute

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/GtTZ2XcjdS Nick Griffin: English people have no culture to speak of. 43rd minute

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/GtTZ2XcjdS Nick Griffin: Turkish birth rate declining. Turks being demographically swamped by Kurds. 45th

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/GtTZ2XcjdS Nick Griffin: Africans are the only people whose birth rate is increasing. 47th minute

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

https://t.co/GtTZ2XcjdS Nick Griffin: The white race will have a reconquista, but not within our lifetimes. 47th minute

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 7, 2016

In a matriarchy, older and wiser heterosexual men are lower in status to the bimbo and gay man

War reporter Michael Buerk: I'm sick of being lectured to by celebs like Cumberbatch

In a matriarchy, foolish young men women find attractive have more influence than wiser older men whom sluts don't want to fuck. This neatly explains why the entire liberal-feminist establishment of the West hates Trump: women don't want to fuck him because they think he is ugly as well as finding him threatening and offensive. 

Female preferences take over when men surrender to sluts.

Men surrender to sluts when they no longer support marriage.

They no longer support marriage because there is no need for them to marry in order to have sex, because fornicating sluts are a dime a dozen. (Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?)

Feminism bribes men with cheap slut sex to keep them quiescent.

Men will do anything for sex, including marry, and they no longer need to marry to get sex because sluts are everywhere.

Sluts are everywhere because feminism has turned women into sluts, children into bastards, men into Morally-Compromised Slut-Fuckers and our civilisation to shit.

We now have an Idiocracy.

Men no longer support marriage when they dare not uncompromisingly support marriage.

The only way to uncompromisingly support marriage is to forbid and punish extramarital sex.  

quran.com/4/15

quran.com/4/16

quran.com/24/2

No man in the West is prepared to do this because all the men in the West have surrendered to sluts.

You may have heard of a book called The Surrendered Wife: A Practical Guide To Finding Intimacy, Passion And Peace With Your Man.  Someone should write a book about The Surrendered Man (also known as the Morally-Compromised Slut-Fucker).  

Should MCSF and SPOSSM bachelors be treated as second class citizens?

Not only do British men not have an alpha male to lead them, most of them are omega males afraid of omega females

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/marriage-is-eugenic-bastardy-dysgenic.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/claire-khaws-class-and-gender-theory-of.html

How PC are you?

How would you feel if your 13 year old

1) son were seduced by his female teacher into having sexual intercourse with her?

2) daughter were seduced by by her male teacher into having sexual intercourse with him but not impregnated?

3) son were seduced into being sodomised by his pederast teacher?

4) daughter were seduced by her lesbian teacher?

If you answer differently to any of the 4 questions are you guilty of discriminating on grounds of age, sex and sexuality?

http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/headteacher-anne-lakey-jailed-for-eight-years-after-having-sex-with-two-boys/ar-AAc2rXl?ocid=UP97DHP

Old white men in UKIP and even Ulstermen are joining the queue to kowtow to queers

Why would anyone vote for British politicians who now spend their lives apparently endlessly queuing up to kowtow to queers?

This moral rottenness has now reached Northern Ireland, as you can see at http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/politics/dup-minister-jim-wells-quits-after-gay-abuse-comments-controversy-31173893.html though they still reject gay marriage. But for how long can these frightened emasculated elderly Ulstermen continue to hold the fort of social conservatism against a tsunami of sluts and sexual liberation and support the principle of marriage (which means forbidding extramarital sex)? Not much longer, I don't think. 

Gay marriage rejected by Northern Ireland Assembly http://t.co/fBAVk4qus2 #NINews pic.twitter.com/6pBGQ71A4N
— Belfast Telegraph (@BelTel) April 27, 2015

UKIP are known to be a party of homophobes. They try to deny this, but cannot quite stop their candidates letting their masks slip, but perhaps this could be turned to their advantage as Conservative voters who are angry about gay marriage vote UKIP to avenge themselves against David Cameron whose idea it was.

Ukip candidate referred to gay people as 'a*** bandits' http://t.co/x1dK24N96m pic.twitter.com/F3e93qDNG9
— The Independent (@Independent) April 28, 2015

Compare and contrast their cowardly and mealy-mouthed disapproval of LGBTs with someone like Anjem Choudary who says the death penalty should follow a conviction of a homosexual act. 

He said: 'If a man likes another man, it can happen, but if you go on to fulfil your desire, if it is proved, then there is a punishment to follow. You don't stone to death unless there are four eyewitnesses. It is a very stringent procedure.

'There are some people who are attracted to donkeys but that does not mean it is right.'

I however only propose to fine homosexuals £100 if caught cottaging if they are photographed in flagrante delicto, so to speak, and believe stoning them to death is more than just a bit harsh. 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1163510/All-homosexuals-stoned-death-says-Muslim-preacher-hate.html 

If Muslims do not vote they should at least spoil their ballot papers and write rude things about democracy such as "Death to Democracy, Long Live the Caliph" or something similar. It would just be boring if they just stayed home. I therefore urge Muslims inclined to follow Choudary's advice to at least go into the polling booth to spoil their ballot paper, or even vote UKIP because they are the party least out of harmony with Koranic principles.  

UKIP want an EU referendum which is consistent with Shura. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shura

UKIP were against gay marriage, which is consistent with 4:15 and 4:16 of the Koran. 

http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/004-qmt.php

It is disgusting that UKIP are just like the frightened and emasculated old white Ulstermen showing a reluctance to kowtow to queers, but at least they are showing a noticeable reluctance in queueing up to to kowtow to them. 

How Secular Koranism would deal with LGBTs and same sex couples

http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/02/14/mass-gay-kiss-in-marks-valentines-day-in-london/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/11412774/Mary-Portas-My-brother-is-the-father-of-my-son.html

Mary Portas (left) and Melanie Rickey, converting their civil partnership into a marriage at Westminster City Hall

Beautiful. Sperm donor father is the brother of the lesbian partner of the mother. I can see why he felt “honoured”. http://t.co/aLY8hoWxpB
— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) February 15, 2015

@RichardDawkins that makes her the babies Auntie. Poor kid will be so confused.
— Dave Rouse (@ethanhunt1961) February 15, 2015

@ethanhunt1961 @RichardDawkins The kid might turn into a serial killer when he has had enough of thinking about his freakish conception..
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 15, 2015

@ntfem @ethanhunt1961 @RichardDawkins Sure because this parrellels Gacy...Dahmer and Bundy... same situation right?
— Jeffrey Harris (@ChitownJeff) February 15, 2015

@ChitownJeff @ethanhunt1961 @RichardDawkins Serial killers tend to have had difficult childhoods.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 15, 2015

Why is @RichardDawkins promoting degeneracy? He can't help it because he is an atheist feminist running dog of the matriarchy.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 15, 2015

It's done Horatio no harm by the looks of it. http://t.co/Kr3eIXIZwH pic.twitter.com/iWmgvWC3MI
— Thomas Simpson (@Simmy41) February 15, 2015

I am sickened I read Mary Portas has a child of convenience not out of love. I feel so sorry for little Horatio and his future. #sadworld
— Ivan Powell (@Caravaggio40) February 14, 2015

"@ntfem: ...Gay marriage is a moral/intellectual abomination which must be abolished as soon as the government regains its sanity."
— PatienceWright (@CliffJump101) February 15, 2015

Horatio's biological mother is having a lesbian relationship with his aunt and his father is his aunt's brother ... http://t.co/GAwRcNyIPK
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 15, 2015

Horatio Portas will grow up explaining to people that his "other mother" is really his aunt having sex with his mum. http://t.co/GAwRcNyIPK
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 15, 2015

You grow up telling people your "other mother" is really your lesbian aunt who has sex with your real mum. Will u have mental health issues?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 15, 2015

@ntfem @TheDrMindbender @RichardDawkins Explain why it is "shit" and "degenerate"?
— Heather Dalgleish (@lordpasternack) February 15, 2015

@lordpasternack @TheDrMindbender @RichardDawkins Just imagine if all the males of the next generation were brought up as Horatio will be.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 15, 2015

@ntfem @TheDrMindbender @RichardDawkins You mean if they were all planned, brought into world by choice of all involved, with loving family?
— Heather Dalgleish (@lordpasternack) February 15, 2015

@lordpasternack @TheDrMindbender @RichardDawkins Wot wd the next generation of men be like if they were all brought up by pairs of lesbians?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 15, 2015

004.015
YUSUFALI: If any of your women are guilty of lewdness, Take the evidence of four (Reliable) witnesses from amongst you against them; and if they testify, confine them to houses until death do claim them, or Allah ordain for them some (other) way.
PICKTHAL: As for those of your women who are guilty of lewdness, call to witness four of you against them. And if they testify (to the truth of the allegation) then confine them to the houses until death take them or (until) Allah appoint for them a way (through new legislation).
SHAKIR: And as for those who are guilty of an indecency from among your women, call to witnesses against them four (witnesses) from among you; then if they bear witness confine them to the houses until death takes them away or Allah opens some way for them.

004.016
YUSUFALI: If two men among you are guilty of lewdness, punish them both. If they repent and amend, Leave them alone; for Allah is Oft-returning, Most Merciful.
PICKTHAL: And as for the two of you who are guilty thereof, punish them both. And if they repent and improve, then let them be. Lo! Allah is ever relenting, Merciful.
SHAKIR: And as for the two who are guilty of indecency from among you, give them both a punishment; then if they repent and amend, turn aside from them; surely Allah is Oft-returning (to mercy), the Merciful.

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Does-promoting-gay-marriage-cause-degeneracy/210948989029916

Islam better religion than Catholicism because it does not have a corrupt priesthood

Catholic Church under sustained attack from Feminists and LGBTs.
http://anglicancatholicpriest.blogspot.co.uk/2010/07/gay-roman-catholic-seminaries.html

Pope Francis does not care how he gets bums on pews as long as he gets bums on his rotten pews.  The Catholic Church will go the way of the Anglican Church and find itself infested with liberals, feminists and homosexuals promoting gay marriage in no time at all, you mark my words.

I am afraid Secular Koranism is the only answer.

The West fondly thinks its religion is Christian, but they should now acknowledge that "religion" is only state ideology by another name.

Most Westerners have not grasped the truth of that the West is as Christian as a skeleton used to be human. A religion that does nothing more than promote the PC Liberal ideology of a PC Liberal State is no more than a Creature of the Corrupt and Effeminate Feminist Liberal State.

The word religion comes from the Latin word "religare", which means "to bind".  To bind what? Why, to bind society, of course.  The purpose of binding society is to protect it from is internal and external enemies. Its internal enemies would be the conflicting interests of men and women, rich and poor, young and old and the aspirant and the established.  The rules must be seen to be fair or there will be trouble.  The external enemies of any society are those who come from other nations to exploit, abuse after invading and conquering it. Currently, it is the needs and wants of women that are elevated above the needs of everyone else to the exclusion of rational argument even. However, current political orthodoxy elevates Feminism to Sacred Cow status, and we already know this:

"We know who is in power by those whom we cannot criticise", and we know we cannot criticise the pornocratic matriarchy, or we will lose our jobs and our position in society.  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/why-i-am-grateful-to-stewart-green-for.html

It is this fear that prevents even well-born and high status men from criticising feminism, because doing so would inevitably result in loss of status and your wife suing you for half your stuff under the rules of no-fault divorce.

As for those who are most affected by feminism - the BNP and its supporters - it is quite obvious that all its men are terminally and fatally afraid of denouncing feminism because they fear to be even more hated and more held in contempt by a society who already regards them as pariahs.

Not only do these pathetic men fear the further lowering of their already low status, they fear the loss of sexual access to their women. Their pitiful lives would be even more insupportable if even more of their women reject them in favour of foreign, Jewish or Muslim men.

Sadly, many of them cannot bring themselves to acknowledge the truth of British gender relations and prefer to call me mad and deluded. Incredibly, they think their way to salvation is to continue whingeing in an effeminate passive-aggressive racist, Islamophobic and antisemitic way.

Being so held in such utter contempt by the rest of society, they suffer from a version of the Battered Wife Syndrome and behave as if Feminism were omnipresent and omniscient, thus availing themselves of the excuse of not challenging Feminism because I would surely lose against this malign deity, and they too suffer the ill-effects of defeat if they are seen to be in any way associated with me in this ideological battle.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battered_person_syndrome#Symptoms  (In reality they are just afraid of their slut female partners getting angry with them and not giving them sex.)

Because of their degraded status of useless degenerates, it is understandable that they are wary of being seen to be preaching the virtues of marriage when they are so clearly unmarriageable.  I completely understand, but it has to be pointed out that it is precisely because I accept that political pariahs have no moral authority that I see the appeal to a supposed Supreme Being - in the form of a new religion for the morally degenerate British - to be practicable, strategic and rational.  

Religion is after all the ancient term for the concept that is intended to be instrumental in bringing about social cohesion.

It is also well-known that marriage is traditionally supported by established religion. In the West established religion is simply the morality of the Bible and the Koran that supports the institutions of the family and marriage by means of the practice of social conservatism, in order to bring about social cohesion.

State ideology can only be promoted and maintained by legislation, of course, and it is not Christianity, Judaism or Islam that is being promoted by Western governments, is it?

Judaism has been more or less declared sexist and racist in Britain.
http://www.theguardian.com/education/2009/jun/25/jewish-school-admissions-policy-discriminatory

A Christian couple running a bed and breakfast has been fined £3600 for exercising what they thought was their right to exclude a gay couple from their home and refusing to do business with them. Liberals are so under the spell of totalitarian PC Liberalism these days that they are no longer cognisant of the liberal principles of Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Association, Freedom of Contract, and the sanctity of private property. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-25119158

The religion of the West is unofficially PC Liberalism AKA Free Love ie the idea that that sex between consenting adults is no one else's business but the copulating couple's.  It was being contemplated by Harriet Harman, Jack Dromey and Patricia Hewitt of the Labour Party that sex between just consenting parties, irrespective of age, should also be made legal.  This was the slippery slope that the Labour Paedo Three slid down under the spell of this pernicious doctrine. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2562518/The-truth-Labour-apologists-paedophilia-Police-probe-child-sex-group-linked-party-officials-wake-Savile.html

We now have an openly gay Court of Appeal judge who is Adviser to the Queen and founder of a paedophile support group to keep paedophiles out of jail.  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2576451/High-court-judge-child-sex-ring-Adviser-Queen-founder-paedophile-support-group-offenders-jail.html

Even an SSM https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379 has been made a part-time judge. http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/feb/12/constance-briscoe-april-retrial-case-chris-huhne

By now saying that he wants the Catholic Church to look into civil unions
http://news.yahoo.com/pope-francis-dolan-gay-marriage-150312090.html?soc_src=mediacontentstory the Pope is making clear that he will see to it that Catholicism will "move with the times", and this means that the Catholic Church will become ever more PC Liberal.

This is the reality of what is happening to the Catholic Church, formerly the West's most powerful and respected religion.

Even more unfortunately for it, it has two Achilles heels: one is Trinitarianism (which the Koran denies) and the other is a corrupt, venal and self-interested clergy.  Pope Francis will have no qualms in liberalising the Church if he thinks doing this will put more bums on its morally rotten pews.  This means the future of the Catholic Church will be similar to the Anglican Church, which will become fatally infested by liberals, feminists and homosexuals, full of contemptible men with third rate minds afraid of women with second rate minds.

Islam on the other hand despises the mumbo-jumbo and hocus-pocus of Trinitarianism (which is the means through which Christians "explain" the divinity of Christ) and only envisages the promotion and maintenance of Islam through legal means.

"The people are the grass and the law the wind.  When the wind blows, the people will bend" is an Old Chinese saying that has particular application and relevance to the principle of the Rule of Law, and it is Islam that has thoroughly grasped its theory and practice.

Through having laws in harmony with God's commands, we would all enjoy the direct benefit of His wisdom. It is my belief that this supposed wisdom of God's is no more than the collective knowledge and wisdom of wise men distilled and credited to an entity that is said to be unique, omnipotent, omniscient, morally perfect and supreme.  Even if we do not believe in God, I think anyone capable of abstract thought would find the contemplation of such noble concepts morally uplifting in itself.  

However, Christians are easily the most hypocritical people in the world because of their religion that compels them to tell a lie.  This lie consists of affirming the Doctrine of the Trinity and those who claim to be practising and believing Christians must say that they believe that Christ is God or else face eternal damnation.

Their corrupt religion has also indoctrinated them into accepting that a corrupt priesthood is capable of giving them salvation and absolution, with the effect that they give no thought to the practical difficulties of serving Justice and Truth in this life, because they are waiting for their non-existent afterlife.

And this is why I, an atheist, believe that the Koran is the best possible guide for humanity and enjoin the implementation of what I acknowledge would be a theocracy - rule according to God's laws as enunciated in the Koran.  I do assure all my readers that the Koranic heaven is far more attractive than the Old and New Testament heaven (if you choose to believe in such a thing) and its punishments significantly less harsh than in the Old Testament.

What I propose is no worse than parents pretending to be the High Priest and High Priestess of the Cult of Santa in the hope of encouraging better behaviour in their children.

Instead of relying on a corrupt clergy to interpret good and evil for us and pretend to absolve us from our sins, we will now have as many different Koranic legal systems as there are nations prepared to infuse their legal system with Koranic principles.  This will mean the best legal minds in every nation interpreting and applying Koranic principles.

Once we all do that, we can all conveniently default on our debts that the practice of usury has burdened us with.  As every fool knows, the prohibition of usury by the Koran was always intended to discourage irresponsible borrowing and lending by individuals and governments and end the boom-bust cycle once and for all.

Once Israel implements Secular Koranism and dumps representative democracy, there will be peace in the Middle East.

What's there not to like?

"Islam was designed to be the antithesis of Catholicism."

	Agree
	Disagree