Translate

Showing posts with label BNP-UKIP Joint Manifesto. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BNP-UKIP Joint Manifesto. Show all posts

Saturday, 15 October 2011

UKIP to readmit Claire Khaw as member?


4 MEMBERSHIP
4.1 Membership is open to UK citizens and resident foreign nationals over the age of 16 years who share its aims and who are not members of any other political party or organisation membership of which the National Executive Committee ("NEC") has declared is incompatible with membership of the Party.   Associate membership may be made available if thought appropriate to persons not qualified under the preceding sentences.

PROHIBITION AGAINST EX-BNP MEMBERS FOUND ON ITS WEBSITE
Membership is not available to anyone who is or has previously been a member of the British National Party or the UK First party. Any applications made from people who are or have been members of these organisations will be refused, and any subscriptions collected will be refunded.
By applying for membership you certify that you are not and have never been a member of either of these parties.






The legally trained such as Paul Oakley (now of UKIP though for years a Conservative) will be aware of the term ultra vires as well as retrospective.   

UKIP have no right to exclude me from joining at all, because the prohibition at http://www.ukip.org/helpukip exceeds the terms of the clause 4.1 of the UKIP constitution.

Ultra vires - exceeding the powers on which it relies

Retrospective - making something an offence when it was not previously, thus making something that was previously legal illegal and punishing an individual for doing something that was legal when he or she did it.   

I no longer expect the average Englishman of the 21st century to have any regard for playing by the rules or fair play, so corrupted are their morals and so extinct their sense of honour, but thought I would just point this out anyway.  

The BNP are associated with being proletarian. Perhaps it is this that puts so many of these exiled Tories in UKIP off accepting ex-BNP members. It may not even be about racism, but about CLASS.

Working class people have a tendency to call a spade a spade and middle class English people like calling a shovel a trowel. 

That's all it is really. 

Were UKIP actually intent on poaching the best BNP members it would benefit enormously too. 

But, perhaps, like the BNP, UKIP don't really want power and don't want to win, not really. 

Maybe they just want to remain the underdog and whinge about that, just like the BNP. 

No killer instinct, no drive, just plodding and lots of it, and plodding in the wrong direction too ....

I suspect the reason why people like Paul Oakley the Conservative, who stayed loyal to Crap Camoronian Cuntism and only fairly recently joined UKIP don't want me to join even though they know I am not racist, is because of the notoriety and attention I would get.

Of course people like him would not wish me to reap the advantages of my taking bold, public and decisive action, while he huddled for YEARS like an indecisive rodent wondering whether to come out of his mousehole.

I am resigned to whatever decision they make, but just wanted to offer my services to UKIP first, out of respect to them for being the most established Eurosceptic party commanding the most votes. You see, I am an honourable woman who knows my place.

If they do not want me, I shall take my business elsewhere or even set up one myself, perhaps on the lines described at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/10/how-english-conservatives-can-sort-out.html rather than suffer myself to be treated with the hysterical suspicion that the cowards who are afraid of being accused of racist would mete out to me, because I was once a member of the BNP.

Wiser heads at UKIP will know that having me would make UKIP less dull, dreary and elderly, but there is no guarantee that they will prevail. I know I have offended a few people in UKIP with my grandstanding, but these easily-offended people should understand that to err is human, to forgive divine, even if they do not believe in God.

I am not a racist.  I am so not a racist that even if you conferred on me racial superiority I would not accept it.

So there.   

Wednesday, 21 September 2011

Why I claim to speak for British Nationalists better than the indigenous white male


A number of nationalists keep asking me - in tones of surprise and some suspicion - why I have nailed my colours to the BNP mast.   One of them even asked if my anti-feminist stance is part of my job as an agent provocateur, designed to get them into trouble with the Feminazis, rather like in the Mao's Hundred Flowers Campaign which invited criticism and then cut down the Hundred Flowers when they criticised ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Let_a_thousand_flowers_bloom

So I will say this to you:

1. I do this because I am a CIVIC nationalist. I live here and care enough about this country to want to fix it, instead of just fucking off home like so many people keep telling me to.

2. I believe Civic Nationalism is enough to give Ethno Nationalists the most of what they want, ie withdrawal from the EU, the repeal all anti-discrimination legislation, family values supported by marriage, respect for family tradition that prevents your children taking up with wasters and losers of their own race or wasters and losers of another and who then give you illegitimate grandchildren whose behaviour will bring shame, disgrace and humiliation on your family, your nation and your race.

3. I acknowledge that most of the wealth created in the world was created by the labour, inventiveness and enterprise of MEN and therefore all the wealth I have been able to enjoy in my lifetime came as a result of men, living and dead, who are dear to me.  I do this for them.

4. Women have the tendency of being generous with other people's money, and that is why Marx encouraged feminism. Feminism is the thin end of the wedge to full-blown Communism, as we shall see.  (Basically, they mess things up and destabilise their own society  by their sex and shopping (ie rampant consumerism and promiscuity) as well as their criminal looting rioting variously-fathered feral bastards so much that it will be vulnerable to any kind of pernicious ideology when order completely breaks down, as we shall soon see.)

5. Women have a tendency to deny the truth as well as being mostly conformist and mediocre, and wish to impose this on everyone else to the detriment of everyone else, for no particular reason that they can explain properly, and they are much less tolerant of difference and far more totalitarian than men.

6. An elderly white working class English widow once remarked to me that "One man is much the same as another." This is precisely why the lionesses in a harem don't run away when they see the father of their cubs usurped by another lion, whom they know will kill their cubs. If they ran away they would be without offspring. If they stayed, suffered their cubs to be killed and to be impregnated by the usurper, who is clearly stronger than the lion he usurped, they at least would have stronger offspring and the status of being in a pride of lions. That is why these lionesses do not help the father of their cubs see off the attempted usurper when he is fighting another lion.  (The moral of this story is that nationalist men should not compromise their principles because they want the approval of their women, who are mostly made up of slut single mums, who are in any case mostly irrational, hypocritical and cowardly.)

7. Not being of the white race, one group of white men and women are as much "my people" as another group. I would however prefer to identify myself with white people who share my political views than white people who do not.

8. The pernicious effects of feminism and liberalism have already spread to the country of my birth and there is now greater tolerance of divorce and single motherhood, which is bad for all races and all nations. If I want to make a stand against it, it is better that I do it in the nation and for the races most and worst affected by it, ie whites in the Liberal West in Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland.

9. I do this because there appears to be no one else prepared to do it or capable of doing it.

10. UKIP will not have me.

My unique position and qualities will help the nationalist white male, and they know it. The fact that I am foreign-born and female confuses the enemy, but I talk their talk and walk their walk, run faster and seek out the enemy more relentlessly than any of them.

As Confucius said:

"The average man is superior to the average woman, but the superior woman is superior to the superior man."   

(I believe this is because the superior woman is not as susceptible to the carnal enticements of sirens and sluts as men are.  I shall be able to resist men throwing themselves at me, and possibly women too.)

It is my hope to establish the most radical, libertarian, liberty-loving, low-taxing, red-tape cutting,  rational, anti-feminist and therefore family values promoting, but non-racist civic nationalist party in the UK that will give Ethno Nationalists most of the important things they want.

I believe I can achieve my Grand Ambition in the following  possible scenarios:

1.  Eddy Butler starting a party with me called the British National Independence Party which will be created for the express purpose of  working towards a merger of the 4th and 5th parties in order to more effectively challenge the LibLabCon.  This can be easily done by giving members and activists better working conditions and an incentive scheme.  (To be honest, I cannot decide between BNIP and SNMSSMP ("Sin No More Slut  Single Mum Party", but I will let Eddy suggest a suitable name if he wants.)

2.  If Eddy Butler joins the English Democrats then I too could join the English Democrats, but only if they agree in writing to (i)  put me in  prominent position. (I have in mind the position of Press Officer AKA Directrix of Communications.) and (ii) radicalise their sleep- and despair-inducing manifesto of contemptible and deliberate blandness.  (I actually hope the weak and stupid English Democrats will reject him as being more trouble than he is worth, so I can have him all to myself.)

Friday, 9 September 2011

BNP v UKIP should now be BNP + UKIP = BNIP (British National Independence Party) led by Claire Khaw if no one else will do it

"No UK political party is a serious party until it has at least one MP. This means UKIP are just as much a joke as the BNP are, but the BNP are funnier."

Claire Khaw's message to UKIP delegates at Eastbourne Conference 2011


Do please give your colleagues and friends my Eurosceptic greetings to the Conference in Eastbourne, and point out to them that the new prohibition against ex-BNP members joining UKIP is ULTRA VIRES ie beyond the powers of the constitution, and UNHELPFUL towards Eurosceptic unity.

http://www.ukip.org/helpukip

If UKIP think they can withdraw from the EU alone, then they are very much deluded, and I have a plan about how to secure this without compromising any UKIP principles.

UKIP also need a new Press Officer and I believe I am the woman for the job.

HINT: Allowing me to join UKIP would assist in facilitating Eurosceptic unity. It would be one small step anyway. My being Press Officer or Director of Communications, if you prefer, would be a bigger step that would start the ball rolling, finally.

"No UK political party is a serious party until it has at least one MP. This means UKIP are just as much a joke as the BNP are, but the BNP are funnier."

Friday, 8 July 2011

UKIP's policy on ex-BNP members


http://www.ukip.org/helpukip

Membership is not available to anyone who is or has previously been a member of the British National Party or the UK First party. Any applications made from people who are or have been members of these organisations will be refused, and any subscriptions collected will be refunded.
By applying for membership you certify that you are not and have never been a member of either of these parties.

How helpful do you think this policy is for the Eurosceptic movement?

On Sunday 17 July 2011 I sent an email in the following terms:

'While I am aware of your official ban on ex-BNP members, I would nevertheless like to hear from you as to the response I would receive if I were to apply to become a member of UKIP.'  



'While I am aware of your official ban on ex-BNP members, I would nevertheless like to hear from you as to the response I would receive if I were to apply to become a member of UKIP.'
was the message I sent you on 17 July 2011. I look forward to receiving a response in due course.  (sent 20 July 2011)

Friday, 10 June 2011

UKIP's mental block about my BNP-UKIP Joint Manifesto idea may be unblocked by sex with Nigel Farage

How can I unblock this collective mental block caused by cowardice and hypocrisy induced by UKIP activists' fear of being called racist?

Would offering to have sex with Nigel Farage, leader of UKIP work?

Many men think I am very dangerous indeed, with mating habits similar to the Black Widow spider, who immediately starts chewing on the head of the male after he has had his orgasm.  It would literally be an experience to die for.  

In the case of Nigel, I will let him survive, for I wish him to explain my very simple idea to his membership and commend it to them before the next General Election.

Here it is again:

"The BNP-UKIP Joint Manifesto would promise to have a referendum on

1. whether to withdraw from the EU; and

2. whether to adopt BNP or UKIP policies where they differ"


This means that neither BNP nor UKIP have to compromise on policies.

This means the Eurosceptic movement will finally gain momentum at last.

It is the only way out of the EU, and UKIP have no better ideas anyway.  


I cannot decide whether UKIP members are pretending to understand my idea when they have not, or are pretending not to understand it when they do.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/06/eukips-fault-that-eurosceptic-movement.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/06/what-eurosceptic-parties-need-to-do.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/06/my-strategy-for-general-election-bnp.html 

Wednesday, 8 June 2011

EUKIP's fault that Eurosceptic movement has not taken off

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7706857.stm
UKIP rejects BNP electoral offer

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/election2010/results/

564,331 (BNP) + 64,826 (English Democrats) + 919,546 (EUKIP) =

TOTAL 1,548, 703

LibDems 6,836,824

Do you get it yet, UKIP? It is all YOUR fault that the Eurosceptic movement is not doing better.

I have proposed a way forward where neither party has to change its policies, but it still ain't good enough for UKIP who are STILL SCARED of being called racist.

"The BNP-UKIP Joint Manifesto would promise to have a referendum on

1. whether to withdraw from the EU; and

 2. whether to adopt BNP or UKIP policies where they differ"

BNP and UKIP do not differ on grammar schools AKA selective education AKA traditional education.

BNP and UKIP are, let's face it, anti-immigration political parties.

The problem is clear:


EUKIP are so afraid of being called racist that they would rather stay in the EU as long as they are not called racist.
EUKIP are so afraid of being called racist that they would rather stay in the EU as long as they are not called racist.
EUKIP are so afraid of being called racist that they would rather stay in the EU as long as they are not called racist.
EUKIP are so afraid of being called racist that they would rather stay in the EU as long as they are not called racist.
EUKIP are so afraid of being called racist that they would rather stay in the EU as long as they are not called racist.
EUKIP are so afraid of being called racist that they would rather stay in the EU as long as they are not called racist.
EUKIP are so afraid of being called racist that they would rather stay in the EU as long as they are not called racist.
EUKIP are so afraid of being called racist that they would rather stay in the EU as long as they are not called racist.

Pathetic and contemptible, is it not?  

Christians talk about fighting but do not define the enemy

10:45 AM @TrinnyConstantine ​​Muslims say that they wouldn't let their children read the Bible because it is full of sex and violence. 1...