Translate

Showing posts with label Chris Grayling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chris Grayling. Show all posts

Thursday, 12 February 2015

My visit to the House of Lords to hear Lord Maginnis speak

Lord Maginnis of Drumglass was educated at The Royal School in Dungannon and at Stranmillis College in Stranmillis in Belfast. He worked as a teacher for a number of years before joining the Ulster Defence Regiment (UDR) in 1971. After leaving the Army with the rank of Major in 1981, he became Ulster Unionist spokesman on internal security and defence, and was that same year elected to Dungannon District Council, on which he sat for twelve years until he lost his seat in 1993. In June 2012, the UUP Whip was withdrawn from Lord Maginnis by party leader Mike Nesbitt over remarks which he made concerning his opposition to same sex marriage. Maginnis subsequently resigned from the UUP on 28 August 2012.

Yesterday, Lord Maginnis spoke on our Presidential system of Government (an unwelcome development with no democratic mandate); also Middle East and Ulster issues; Q&A. Lord Maginnis has a particular interest in Iran and recently attended a conference organised by the National Council of Resistance in Iran.

I am afraid I did not really know what he meant by that since it is easier for a British Prime Minister to start a war than an American President who has to obtain the approval of the both houses of Congress.  

My guess is that he was really complaining about the remoteness of Cameron surrounded by inexperienced advisers whom he regarded as young whipper snappers who have never had a proper job in their lives still wet behind the ears, and it seems he thinks the problem was particularly acute in the Foreign Office. Things were rather different when Thatcher was in power, but at the time, I can imagine that Unionist MPs would naturally get a lot of media attention as well as access to the Prime Minister anxious to do a deal with the Shinners and the Loyalists.  Another question I regretted not asking him was whether he approved of Theresa May's Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill.

The House of Lords is these days is "no longer about governing the country or giving advice" to the Commons any longer, he said, but a place where political cronies of the Lower House are rewarded.

He told us of what George Mitchell, the US Special Envoy for Northern Ireland said when he introduced him to Martin McGuinness (whom Lord Maginnis described as a "very able politician"): 

"Ah, Ken, I must introduce you to Martin over here: you two have the same name and must be related." 

It seems that the two men took rather well to this diplomatic banter, and the rest is history.  

Lord Maginnis is often invited to events in the Irish Republic. I asked, in the context of a United Ireland, if he thought that rule from Dublin would be really that much worse than rule from London and he readily conceded that it was probably not. Indeed, he praised a politician whose name I did not catch for so rigorously and faithfully pursuing its austerity programme.  

He was asked why there are now four Unionist parties in Northern Ireland but said he did not really know the answer and was guessing that it was probably a lack of a sense of purpose.  

On the theme of bad government, he took particular exception to Chris Grayling, the only Lord Chancellor in British history who was not also a lawyer.  He particularly deplored how a Christian JP was disciplined and "re-educated" for daring to express his view that children should only be adopted by  married heterosexual couples rather than gay couples gaily married. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2914951/Suspended-sent-equality-training-Christian-magistrate-said-Adopted-child-needs-mum-dad-not-gay-parents.html

He disapproved of the proposed bill to sack MPs, 

"We are teaching a responsible adult population to treat MPs like naughty boys." 

As for the his conviction of road rage, you may wish to view the video at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-23755559 showing a man in his 20s loping towards the court. Lord Maginnis is now 77 and not tall.  This young man whom Lord Maginnis described as being of about 6 feet claimed to be terrified of a white-haired not very tall 75 year old man with a weak arm and an arthritic shoulder. The incident occurred as a result of Lord Maginnis stopping his car and allowing a woman to cross the road and the young man behind him sounding his horn long and repeatedly, infuriating him so much he got out of his car to confront the driver. 

He told us that he is currently being pursued to pay his fine after his conviction of fare-dodging in Croydon, and says he has extensive documentary evidence to prove that the incident was the result of a genuine misunderstanding and mistake. He will continue to refuse paying the fine which increases if one does not pay it, he tells us, and says he did not receive a fair trial.

Lord Maginnis did indeed speak about the Iranian refugees now being persecuted by Iraq, but whys and wherefores went over my head, I am afraid, as did what he said about Cyprus and Turkey.

I must also say that the mixed nuts in the Strangers' Bar are really the best I have ever had and also noticed that the Lords' division bell was far more tuneful than the Commons' division bell. 



I was tempted to be photographed INSIDE the phone booth, but I am sure I would not have found any accomplices willing to photograph my proposed "crime"!

The Strangers' Bar

The ceiling of the Strangers' Bar

Lovely Pugin wallpaper. 





Thursday, 27 May 2010

Party Democracy and Its Importance in a Democratic Nation

http://yourbnp.com/2010/05/26/red-white-and-blue-2010-cancelled/

The Red White and Blue is the BNP's annual summer event.

It has been cancelled, it has been suggested, in order to stop people getting together to discuss leadership challenge for which nominations have to be in by mid-August.

Having read the new constitution as best I can, online, I have now formed the opinion that it is in fact practically impossible, under such a constitution to dislodge the Chairman.

All right if he is the one who has built up the party to its present size and influence, not so good if he is one no-good sonofabitch getting fat on the party donations and dragging it down.

Perhaps not all right even if it is St Nicholas who is the Chairman because the principle of party democracy should protect individuals members from the arbitrary decisions of the leader.

The party should exist to serve its members and supporters, not the interests leader.

It is virtually impossible to change the constitution too.

Party democracy, anyone?

This problem is not confined solely to the BNP either. The Tory Party constitution is also another autocrat's charter.

At least the BNP constitution is online and you can find it at

http://www.bnp.org.uk/?q=constitution-british-national-party

The Tory Party constitution is nowhere to be seen, locked away in the way Mr Rochester locked up his mad wife.

The moment you ask for it, they will be put on notice that you could be a trouble-maker.

Was it right for

1. Enoch Powell to be expelled from the Tory Party for saying that uncontrolled immigration is perhaps not a very good idea and would probably have long-term future consequences for the indigenous population of this country?

2. Nigel Hastilow to be withdrawn as a Tory candidate simply for saying that his constituents had said "Enoch was right"?

2. Patrick Mercer to have been demoted for discussing what does or does not constitute racism?

3. Alan Duncan to have been demoted for telling the truth about MPs being treated like shit and forced to live on rations?

4. Chris Grayling to not become Home Secretary because he dared to suggest that B&B owners should have the right to refuse the custom of homosexual men demanding a double bed, if that is what they want to do? (Theresa May will be awful. Jacqui Smith was dire. Any female Home Secretary will be dreadful because most women cannot keep order. I would probably be the noble exception, but we will never know now.)

5. Peter Mandelson to join the wrong party and therefore fail to become the Prime Minister he could have been? (I dedicate my one-party idea to him, with all my love and respect, and more!)

In case this is not quite clear, let me point out that a one-party state frees the politician to change his mind about things at any time in the light of experience and maturity, while a multi-party system chains him to his tribe for the rest of his career. As we all know, tribal loyalty is amoral rather than principled.

Differences can always be resolved intra-party because it can be done more swiftly and efficiently than the inter-party method we currently have, which is sclerotic, corrupt, oligarchical and frankly no longer fit for purpose either for those in government or those who are governed.

The Chinese Communist Party constitution is in English online for people everywhere to admire.

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2007-10/25/content_6944738_1.htm

You can be sure after what Mao did -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hundred_Flowers_Campaign

- the Chinese would try to make damn sure nothing like that ever happened to them again.

That was why they over-reacted to the personality cult of Falun Gong. Mao, in case anyone didn't know, was a massive personality cult.

The British do have something to learn from the Chinese when it comes to issues of party democracy, but they would rather die than admit it.

Or at the very least suffer more decades of decline and misrule by fools and knaves.

Sunday, 4 April 2010

Homo Fascism rules OH GAY in the U KAY

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8602457.stm

Why can't Chris Grayling say B&B owners should have the right to exclude any guests on any grounds if it is their home? Methinks the B&B owners of Britain are being oppressed by Homo-Fascism.

http://www.christianaction.org.za/articles/homofascisminsa.htm

Liberty is nearly dead in this country unless we unite to assert it.

Why must I have people I don't want in any B&B I run?

Why should homosexuals or anyone else FORCE me into taking their custom?

Who the hell do they think they are??

Some sort of PRIVILEGED PROTECTED group???

Well, there's equality before the law for you.

All animals are equal, but some animals - especially homos, ethnics, disabled and women - are more equal than others.


Vote BNP-UKIP (who have promised to repeal anti-discrimination thoughtcrime legislation)!

http://bnp.org.uk/policies/democracy/

http://www.ukip.org/media/policies/UKIPjobs.pdf (page 5, 2.4.2 - more long-winded and vague)

Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...