My application to become member of the Monday Club rejected

Dear Ms Khaw

Thank you for your application to the Conservative Monday Club dated 10 March 2013.

Your application has now been considered and we regret that it has not been successful.
Please accept our best wishes for the future.

Yours sincerely 

On behalf of the Executive of the Conservative Monday Club

18 April 2013

MY APPLICATION of 10 March 2013

Are you a former member of the Monday Club? YES

If the answer is YES, please give your reason for leaving.

I was a member in mid 1990s. I am afraid I did not attend any meetings and simply allowed my membership to lapse.

Are you a member of the Conservative Party? 

It is a difficult question to answer, since I did join on 17 September 2012 but was expelled on 20 December 2012.  I am currently appealing against my expulsion and my appeal will be heard on 27 March 2013.

Further information can be found at the links below:

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/claire-khaws-membership-of-conservative.html - letter from Stephen Phillips, Secretary of the Board of the Conservative Party, informing me that my membership has been cancelled.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/letter-before-claim-to-conservative.html - my Letter Before Claim to the Conservative Party demanding that it give a reason for the cancellation of my membership

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/conservative-party-allows-me-to-appeal.html - Conservative Party gives reasons for my expulsion and informs me of my right to appeal.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/my-appeal-against-cancellation-of-my.html
My appeal (which I have been informed will be heard on 27 March) [http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/chairman-of-conservative-party-claims-i.html
My appeal against expulsion from the Conservative Party was dismissed.]

Name of any organisation concerned with politics or current affairs, other than the Conservative Party, to which you belong or have belonged and the relevant date. 

I attended dinners at the Baldwin Society and the Conservative Democratic Alliance, organised by the late Michael Keith Smith.  This would be from about 2005 until about 2008.

I have been a member of UKIP, the Labour Party and the BNP.

In the BNP, I was prospective 2011 London Mayoral Candidate until my expulsion in July 2011.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/claire-khaw-expelled-from-bnp.html reproduces my letter of expulsion from the BNP for making comments that mothers of disabled children found offensive.

Below, to help my application, are links outlining my ideas on how to make the Conservative Party and the country more conservative.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/blueprint-for-new-britain-how-to-oust.html
BLUEPRINT FOR A NEW BRITAIN: How to oust Cameron and leave the EU

http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Claire_Khaw is an entry about me in Metapedia.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/roger-scruton-asks-just-what-is-this.html discusses what it is that Conservatives ought to conserve.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/conserving-long-term-national-interest.html proposes that it is the long-term national interest that Conservatives should be conserving through the incorporation of Russell Kirk's 6 Canons of Conservatism into into the Conservative Party's Statement of Principles.    

I have not enclosed a cheque, because I thought it would be as well to let you know a little about myself first, since I am considered a controversial figure.  Once informed that my membership will be approved, I will complete and send the form together with a cheque for £20.


Name of Proposer (who is a paid-up member of the Conservative Monday Club)

I met the President on 19 March 2013 through Alan Harvey.  If the President approves of my activities, he may propose me.

I feel you ought to know that I was also arrested in January 2013, but am not yet charged.  I am to answer bail on 5 April 2013.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/my-arrest-at-0740-on-24-january-by-five.html explains the reasons for my arrest.

If you do not have a proposer, it will help in presenting your application if you write a paragraph on why you wish to become a member of the Conservative Monday Club. 

I wish to become a member in order to assist in the propagation of Conservative ideas and the implementation of Conservative principles, which seems to be in retreat and giving ground all the time.

It is demoralising to hear politicians saying something interesting, bold, Conservative and controversial only to hear of them apologising or resigning three days later.

Patrick Mercer http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6434053.stm,
Alan Duncan  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/conservative/6152810/Alan-Duncan-sacked-from-shadow-cabinet.html
David Willetts  http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/apr/01/david-willetts-feminism-lack-of-jobs
Maurice Glasman http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jul/20/blue-labour-conservative-female-subservience
Nigel Hastilow http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7077934.stm

are names that come to mind.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/how-to-make-conservative-party.html contains my proposals on the Theory and Practice of Conservatism.

I believe I know how to turn the tide and only ask that my ideas be given a fair hearing.

It would help us if you would indicate how you heard about the Conservative Monday Club. 

I heard of the Club through the press.


http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/chairman-of-conservative-party-claims-i.html
My appeal against expulsion from the Conservative Party was dismissed.

Sunday Sermon: On Liberty

Previous generations enjoyed more freedom of speech, contract and association than we do.

This means our freedoms have in fact been eroded but most of us are too dumb to notice or too apathetic to care.

The strongest statement I can make as a libertarian is to join the BNP, in order to stand up for their right to say what they believe to be the truth - ie that they do not like immigration and utterly fail to see how it has benefited people like them - without being smeared as evil Nazi Fascist Racist extremists.
 
Only those who assert their rights deserve liberty. The views of the ones who wait to be allowed to speak come from an inferior source.

Most of our MPs and those in the political establishment do not deserve to be in government and should not be trusted to represent anyone, because they can be so easily cowed into apologising and resigning for speaking what they think is the truth when asked by someone who is a traitor to their cause to do so.  That traitor to their cause is, tragically and ironically, their own leader.

David Cameron does not mean Conservatism well.  He is like a cushion who bears the imprint of the person who last sat on him - in this case New Labour, who started two unprofitable and unwinnable wars in the name of the British people, who legalised "marriage" for same-sex couples, who are the enemy of selective traditional education and who are too frightened to criticise single mothers who are going forth and multiplying,  increasing the burden of the taxpayer while lowering standards of education and morality with every little bastard that is born in this country every minute of every day.  

These days around 50% of babies are born out of wedlock and 70% of the UK prison population were singly-parented. 

The constitution of the Conservative Party allows David Cameron to say that Conservatism is whatever he says Conservatism is.  If he says Conservatism is Socialism, then it is.  If he says the Big Society is smaller government, then it is, even if it is a lie. If he says he supports marriage while refusing to condemn single mummery because Theresa May has forbidden Tories to be nasty to them, then that policy cannot be questioned, derided or challenged. 

Tories have shit for brains and piss for guts, just like New Labour.  Destination Third World hellhole remains on course.

Where else can you expect our political establishment to lead us to if the supposed alpha male of the British nation - our Prime Minister David Cameron no less -  is too cowardly and hypocritical to even condemn the sluts, slags and slapper single mums who are a burden on the state and who are even now in the process of multiplying themselves?

As I said, the Tories are shit for brains piss for guts limp-dicks, all of them - even the ones who call themselves Libertarians.

We will never return to rationally small government while British  men are afraid of losing the votes of slut and slapper British women.

A pox on that cunt of convictionless Conservatism Cameron

Every day and in every way my hatred for that cunt Cameron who has a policy of sacking or demoting colleagues that speak the truth quickens and deepens.  I pray for the arrival of the buses that he will be found under. 

The Limpest Dick

Maybe there should be a contest for Tory MPs to see how long they can go without apologising for saying what the rest of the country thinks anyway, with a prize for the one who holds out the longest.

We can call it THE LIMPEST DICK. 

You are the Limpest Dick.  Goodbye.  

BNP and UKIP holds the liberal torch in 2010 (Liberal in the sense of letting people do what they want if they do not hurt others.)

The Free Society and Liberal Vision present
WHO HOLDS THE LIBERAL TORCH IN 2010?
Libertarians, Lib Dems or the “liberal elite”?
Tuesday June 29, 2010
Chaired by Mark Littlewood (Institute of Economic Affairs), speakers include Julian Harris (chairman, Liberal Vision), Chris Mounsey (leader, Libertarian party), Brendan O’Neill (editor, Spiked!), Paul Staines (aka blogger Guido Fawkes), James Delingpole (writer, journalist and broadcaster), Mark Pack (co-editor, Liberal Democrat Voice) and Michael White (assistant editor, Guardian)

What was interesting was that no one attempted to answer the question at all: WHO HOLDS THE LIBERAL TORCH IN 2010?

No one mentioned anti-discrimination thoughtcrime legislation or the EU.   

Surely it is impossible to consider oneself a libertarian if one wants to remain in the EU?

This would be a clear case of preferring security to liberty and therefore deserving neither, as Benjamin Franklin said. 

It was first the BNP and then UKIP who proposed repealing all thoughtcrime anti-discrimination legislation. Even the Libertarian Party does not in their manifesto mention repealing any thoughtcrime legislation.

 
http://lpuk.org/pages/manifesto.php

I did try to point out to several people that proposing the end of indiscriminate universal suffrage and limiting the franchise to taxpayers only would do the trick.

This would immediately disenfranchise most parasitical single mums, which would be a good thing and a big step towards small government.

Britain is a country now ruled by Mumsnet values of whingeing, asking for more handouts and more nannying legislation.

It is of course parasitical women who want the nanny state and their public sector non-jobs.  They cannot be ignored, for constitute half the electorate. 

The way to achieve small government is therefore to disenfranchise these women, by rejecting indiscriminate universal suffrage in favour of a narrower taxpayer-only franchise in a one-party state whose constitution protects the rights of individual members against the leader and his cronies.

It can be done and indeed has been done in China - a country that is paradoxically more Libertarian than the West, if we would but accept this truth.

The Chinese can say offensive things to each other without ending up in court or losing their job after being accused of racism.  Chinese Communist Party members have a recognised procedure if they get into trouble with the Party, and do not get summarily demoted or expelled by the leader the way Powell, Mercer and Duncan were, just for speaking their minds.  They would have a right to be tried before a formal tribunal.  What they had to endure during the time of Chairman Mao has ensured that members' rights are better protected now than during the time of Mao.  

In short, repealing all anti-discrimination legislation - as UKIP and the BNP propose - would  be a necessary start on the long arduous journey towards smaller and more rational government.  

In return for the women agreeing to dump feminism, they can be offered a higher chance of finding a husband who will provide for them so they can be the wives and mothers most of them want to be.  


Sorted. 

Why I have no wish to become MP

Becoming MP is the occupation of being paid by the taxpayer to lose the ability to speak your mind.

What sane and honourable person would willingly do that, and then be treated like shit and expected to live on rations?

"Homophobic" means saying anything that might offend homosexuals?

Iain Daile said on Facebook today:

http://iaindale.blogspot.com/2010/05/ben-bradshaw-hang-your-head-in-shame.html

Claire Khaw

Anyway, what is wrong with keeping one's options open? David Laws could be thinking: "I might be prepared to bat for a different side if I finally meet a member of the opposite sex whose company I feel reasonably confident of being able to enjoy long term."

I am afraid even now I entertain hopes of a certain Lord of the Labour Party in my unrequited love for him ...

Claire Khaw

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2010/05/david-laws-goes-mown-down-by-collective.html

Jill Garrow

Ben Bradshaw really needs to refrain from making bitchy comments about fellow gay men - it makes him look so nasty. I remember, not that long ago, he had a spat with Conservative gay MP Alan Duncan - and came off worst.

Claire Khaw

Gay men are vile to their own kind. Being gay, old, ugly and poor is much much worse than being straight, old, ugly and poor. I have seen the way they treat each other when they don't fancy each other.

Iain Dale

Ok, Claire Khaw. You have tried my patience once too often. You can take your BNP homophobic views elsewhere. You're not welcome here any longer.

Claire Khaw

Saying something that is offensive to a homosexual does not necessarily mean I am homophobic. Since I am expressing deep and intense regret at the sacking of David Laws as well as a deep and abiding admiration for Peter Mandelson, I don't quite see how what I am saying suggests that I hate homosexuals.

I would have thought what I have said displays a knowledge and experience of what being gay is like, which means that I actually have gay friends and know the kind of lives they live.

And then I was defriended.

Party Democracy and Its Importance in a Democratic Nation

http://yourbnp.com/2010/05/26/red-white-and-blue-2010-cancelled/

The Red White and Blue is the BNP's annual summer event.

It has been cancelled, it has been suggested, in order to stop people getting together to discuss leadership challenge for which nominations have to be in by mid-August.

Having read the new constitution as best I can, online, I have now formed the opinion that it is in fact practically impossible, under such a constitution to dislodge the Chairman.

All right if he is the one who has built up the party to its present size and influence, not so good if he is one no-good sonofabitch getting fat on the party donations and dragging it down.

Perhaps not all right even if it is St Nicholas who is the Chairman because the principle of party democracy should protect individuals members from the arbitrary decisions of the leader.

The party should exist to serve its members and supporters, not the interests leader.

It is virtually impossible to change the constitution too.

Party democracy, anyone?

This problem is not confined solely to the BNP either. The Tory Party constitution is also another autocrat's charter.

At least the BNP constitution is online and you can find it at

http://www.bnp.org.uk/?q=constitution-british-national-party

The Tory Party constitution is nowhere to be seen, locked away in the way Mr Rochester locked up his mad wife.

The moment you ask for it, they will be put on notice that you could be a trouble-maker.

Was it right for

1. Enoch Powell to be expelled from the Tory Party for saying that uncontrolled immigration is perhaps not a very good idea and would probably have long-term future consequences for the indigenous population of this country?

2. Nigel Hastilow to be withdrawn as a Tory candidate simply for saying that his constituents had said "Enoch was right"?

2. Patrick Mercer to have been demoted for discussing what does or does not constitute racism?

3. Alan Duncan to have been demoted for telling the truth about MPs being treated like shit and forced to live on rations?

4. Chris Grayling to not become Home Secretary because he dared to suggest that B&B owners should have the right to refuse the custom of homosexual men demanding a double bed, if that is what they want to do? (Theresa May will be awful. Jacqui Smith was dire. Any female Home Secretary will be dreadful because most women cannot keep order. I would probably be the noble exception, but we will never know now.)

5. Peter Mandelson to join the wrong party and therefore fail to become the Prime Minister he could have been? (I dedicate my one-party idea to him, with all my love and respect, and more!)

In case this is not quite clear, let me point out that a one-party state frees the politician to change his mind about things at any time in the light of experience and maturity, while a multi-party system chains him to his tribe for the rest of his career. As we all know, tribal loyalty is amoral rather than principled.

Differences can always be resolved intra-party because it can be done more swiftly and efficiently than the inter-party method we currently have, which is sclerotic, corrupt, oligarchical and frankly no longer fit for purpose either for those in government or those who are governed.

The Chinese Communist Party constitution is in English online for people everywhere to admire.

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2007-10/25/content_6944738_1.htm

You can be sure after what Mao did -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hundred_Flowers_Campaign

- the Chinese would try to make damn sure nothing like that ever happened to them again.

That was why they over-reacted to the personality cult of Falun Gong. Mao, in case anyone didn't know, was a massive personality cult.

The British do have something to learn from the Chinese when it comes to issues of party democracy, but they would rather die than admit it.

Or at the very least suffer more decades of decline and misrule by fools and knaves.

Alan Duncan and free speech

Many have gloated and rubbed their hands in glee about Duncan's shit statement landing him in the proverbial do-do.

What he says is actually quite unsurprising and I would have no hesitation in admitting to being probably one of the MPs who would have got herself into trouble over very lax rules about expenses and then complained about there being a witch-hunt.

If Duncan wants to complain publicly or privately, that is up to him.

It is quite tragic that people cannot see the principle behind this.

My point is that free speech should be upheld, especially for people we dislike or we will not have free speech when others in turn dislike us for telling us things they would rather not hear.

No one, but no one, should be punished for telling the truth, not even an MP, not even an MP whom you dislike, not even if he is gay.

Nothing should happen to him but it seems it is his own side who want most to throw him to the wolves.

Haven't the Conservatives heard that those who do not hang together will hang separately?

Make no mistake that if we do not defend the right of our elected representatives to speak their mind, then we too will soon lose that right, and deservedly so.

Alan Duncan on being treated like shit and how MPs can redeem themselves

http://conservativehome.blogs.com/thetorydiary/2009/08/alan-duncan-caught-on-secret-video-saying-that-mps-are-treated-like-st.html

They are treated like shit because they are perceived to be shit.

What have they done to lower taxes and keep us safe from the fear of crime and the fear of not getting justice when we are victims of crime? Or improve the laughable state of British "education"? Or anything at all?

Instead they have voted for us to enter a dishonourable and ruinous war.

I think only a ritual suicide would assuage public anger now. Perhaps the Japanese have something to teach us about this.

There has been much talk lately about MPs feeling suicidal and it might be an idea to choose just one who is feeling most suicidal to redeem the political class as a whole. A mass suicide may be considered excessive and unnecessary.

I do believe the British public would appreciate such a gesture.

http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/52114,news,alan-duncan-apologises-after-foul-mouthed-remarks-on-mps-expenses-heydon-prowse-shadow-leader-of-the-house

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2009/aug/12/alan-duncan-mps-expenses-video-sting

POLL: Should Alan Duncan stay in the Shadow Cabinet?

http://www.1party4all.co.uk/Home/Account/TopicForm.aspx?topicsId=140