Mark Collett's alleged Jewish heritage

Does Mark Collett - former BNP member infamous for his controversial views on Jews - have Jewish heritage while being unaware of it? Years ago, I pointed out to Mark that he did look as if he could be Jewish. Indeed, he looked so Jewish that I assumed that I was not the first person to point this out to him. He remained silent.

Rabbi Mizrachi himself admits that there are many people who think they are Jews but are not, and many people who think they are gentile but are in fact Jews. One could end up being a self-hating Jew. Self-loathing has long been regarded as a sign of mental illness and a feature of living in the early 21st century West is its ever rising levels of mental illness.

Is the West capable of correcting itself before it ends up gouging out its own eyes in despair and self-loathing, as Oedipus did?
https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/o/the-oedipus-trilogy/play-summary/oedipus-the-king

The tragedy of Oedipus Rex is about a man who didn't know his parents. He ended up murdering his father in a road rage incident and having sex with a cougar that turned out to be his mother.

If we didn't know who our parents are, we could end up committing incest with our sibling, sugar daddy or cougar.

Isn't it already painfully obvious that condoning casual sex would inevitably lead to dysgenics and degeneracy?

Interestingly, it was the the late Jewish baronet Keith Joseph who pointed out to the British in 1974 in his Edgbaston speech that they were destroying their "human stock" by condoning unmarried parenthood. He paid dearly for pointing out the obvious when he found himself apologising for his speech. A man who was widely regarded as a Prime Minister in waiting found himself serving under Margaret Thatcher, Britain's first female Prime Minister - the first milestone of matriarchy. Before Keith Joseph, it was Enoch Powell who destroyed his career by pointing out the obvious. Unlike Joseph, he did not apologise.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron

Why won't nationalists talk about marriage and family values instead of endlessly obsessing about Jews?

We know who we is in power by those we dare not criticise, and I don't mean the Jews. They now have a representative in Downing Street, sharing the bedroom of the British Prime Minister.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

Blue Labour thinking, with its emphasis on community-led solutions, is being touted as the party's version of the Big Society, and it's also possible that his emphasis on "family, faith and flag" will be a means of Labour outflanking the coalition on the right. The feminazis of the Labour Party destroyed his career.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/jul/19/lord-glasman-radical-traditionalist

The feminazis of the Labour Party Helen Goodman and Harriet Harman destroying Maurice Glasman's career
https://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2011/06/blue-labour-john-era-goodman

Atheism, fornication, degeneracy and why our politicians only fill their boots

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/fill-your-boots

Your nation is degenerate when your government will not even discuss making the law supporting marriage and family values because it knows that the majority of parents are not married parents in a society where fornication is normalised whose human stock has been destroyed, as the late Keith Joseph warned in 1974.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron

In a degenerate society that is a matriarchy, short term thinking is the ignoble rule and abstractions such as the long term national interest and morality are not the concerns of its leaders who can think no further than the next general election, always less than five years away.

Everything about feminism undermines marriage and every feminist condones fornication. Feminism keeps men quiescent by bribing them with fornication. If fornication were a drug, the slut is the drug dealer.

Knowing this, addicted Western Man will nevertheless not want to give up fornication or the idea of it being his human right because he knows he and his civilisation are dying and, being atheist, wants to enjoy all its available sexual pleasures in this life before it is over.

The addict will not be calling the cops on his dealer.

After what happened to Enoch Powell and Keith Joseph, no senior male politician will be thinking of risking his career for a society whose human stock was not only threatened, but appears to have been destroyed. It is indeed true that people get the government they deserve.

Are there even ten good men in Britain any more, let alone ten righteous men in our political class?

https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/832/why-did-abraham-stop-at-ten-in-genesis-1832

Why does Hungary have Orban but the British only have May, a childless clueless woman who wouldn't know what the British national interest is even if it walked up to her and snatched her handbag?

Catholicism, though failing, has managed to preserve some of the patriarchy that remains in Hungary. 

Only a patriarchy would produce enough good strong men capable of defending the national interest.

A patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers.

A matriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of immoral unmarried mothers who are bad mothers and bring into being illegitimate offspring who tend to be criminal and even if not actually criminal, underachieve and then become a burden on society. Their offspring tend not to be desirable employees thus creating a demand for cheaper more willing foreign labour.

Britain has been a matriarchy since 1974.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

What is an Islamophobe?

An Islamophobe is someone who denies that it is ever irrational to hate and fear Muslims and Islam. Islamophobes also persist in conflating a book Muslims do not follow - the Koran - with criminals and terrorists who have been identified as Muslims.

Such a person is invariably a supporter of an anti-immigration party. While he is clearly concerned about immigration, the immigrants who most disturb him are Muslims.

While such a person would probably also have a problem with Jews, Muslims are more new and alien, more alarming and in-your-face.

Such a person - usually from the lower classes and generally represented by White Van Man and now more recently described as "gammon" - would either be atheist or only weakly Christian. He also perceives that his own government does not care about him and people like him and he would be right, for the matriarchy does not care to protect men's interests (ie patriarchy, marriage and family values) and is only concerned to extract yet more feminine privileges to a populace of leaderless men, who have been abandoned by their priests and their government.

How did Britain come to be a matriarchy and when did it become a matriarchy? Britain became a matriarchy in 1974 when Keith Joseph, a Jew who was widely considered to be a Prime Minister in waiting, rang the alarm by saying "our human stock is destroyed" by unmarried mothers and the tolerance of widespread illegitimacy. His Prime Ministerial prospects were destroyed and Thatcher became leader of the Conservative Party.

Another politician who sounded the alarm was Enoch Powell in 1968 and he too had his Prime Ministerial prospects destroyed.

Britain has been a matriarchy for nearly half a century. The three chief features of a matriarchy are the following:

1. There is no male solidarity.

2. Any male leaders are chosen by women.

3. No male, however senior his position, will dare to criticise the morals of immoral women.

These supporters of anti-immigration parties come from fatherless homes and have been in some way damaged by their childhood and state education which of course had a knock on effect on their career prospects.

Such people would find it very hard to accept the following:

1) That democracy is not the most rational form of government

2) That Christianity is kaput and must be replaced

To take their mind off the fact that their political system and religion has been wrong for centuries, they find it easier to blame Muslims, who are but the symptoms of a deeper malaise - the disease of the mind that is feminism.

If such people did not hate Muslims and in particular Muslims who are immigrants both legal and illegal, they would have to end up hating democracy, Christianity and their own government and it looks as if they already do.

Because no obvious solution presents itself other than pogrom, they can currently only express their feelings of hatred against Muslims, who are but the symptoms of a deeper malaise - the disease of the mind that is feminism.

Whom would they hate if they ceased to hate Muslims? Immoral women of their own race to whom they are not married but still want to have sex with?

They would also hate their own government, democracy and Christianity.

And once they start hating those, the solution will become obvious.

The answer became obvious to Arthur Wagner of AfD who became Ahmed.

The brain drain of the white race

Pity Western Man, now so terrified of being falsely and maliciously accused of a historic sexual offence and so trigger-happy that he will shoot anyone in front of him, even one who is attempting to defend him.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

Those who are not afraid to challenge the matriarchy are intellectual mediocrities, low status under-educated men who condemn themselves the moment they open their mouths with their rabid racism, antisemitism and Islamophobia, bad grammar, regional accent and beta male persona.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

Unmarriageable atheist bachelors AKA MGTOW are the other half of the problem of matriarchy. Unmarriageable men means increased bastardy which means more tolerance of bastardy and fornicating sluts meaning more and more of the same until an Islamic takeover, I suppose.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

In a matriarchy, all men are beta males subject to the whims of the fornicating slut and unmarried mother. The instantly alpha male would be a man of requisite status and charisma prepared to challenge and defeat it. No one man with anything to lose at all will come forward.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

The fact that no man with anything to lose will emerge to challenge the matriarchy is because such a man would already know he cannot rely on the loyalty of the beta males below, who are not only low status, but men of infamous for their disloyalty and inability to follow orders.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

Proletarian white males complaining about immigration are mostly fatherless low-skilled socially retarded with some behavioural problem usually caused by drug/drink-dependency. No one in nationalism would even dare deny this. No marriage, no family values, no religion, no morals.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

No morals, no male solidarity, no co-operation possible to deal with the eternal enemies of society and civilisation: sluts and socialists who have a symbiotic relationship. This means there is only a degenerate culture no sane and moral immigrant would want to integrate into.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

And so this, in a nutshell, is why the white man's status in his own land has become progressively lower (pun intended) over the decades. The immigrant male knows white men are too afraid to challenge their own women and too divided to protest effectively.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

Because their own women reject them, they turn gay to get cheap sex from each other. Soon they will grow old and die without issue and descendants and wonder what happened to their lives and their country, blaming Jews, Muslims and foreigners as they breathe their last.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

You don't know what you've got till it's gone. Can you imagine such men restoring the patriarchy or restoring the patriarchy with such low status degenerate unmarriageable leaderless men whom no one wants to lead? They are indeed being warehoused for extinction.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

In the meantime, what are white women to do? The marriageable of them will try to marry marriageable men, and they will not be men of their own race whom they already despise: feminised and impoverished.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

What about marriageable white men already aware of the moral devastation wreaked by feminism? They'll reject white women. I recently heard of Asian Aryanism, a term used for white nationalists who reject white women and take up with Oriental women because of their sensible views.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

To secure their own reproductive rights within their own lifetimes, white men and women feel they have to mate with other races in order to have legitimate progeny and bring them up with a spouse who believes in family values. This is the deadly reality of racial degeneracy.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

Are you surprised that "mainstream" alt-right YouTubers such as @MillennialWoes and @MarkACollett won't discuss any of this with me? I have the solution but it is what their subscribers cannot bear to hear, so they promulgate race war or urge some form of displacement activity.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

I hope to demonstrate that the principles of nationalism are the same for every race and nation: patriarchy supported by marriage using a moral system whose laws support marriage. This can only mean Islam if you are a gentile in the West, because Christianity is kaput.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

I have been saying for years that sluts and socialists are the eternal enemies of society and the only protection against this is the practice of slut-shaming that is required by any religion that promotes patriarchal moral values. These would be the five world religions, but as you know, all religions can be subverted once they ignore their own rules and people either don't notice or don't care.

The sexually-liberated atheist is more prone to doing this than a Jew or a Muslim because Jews and Muslims are more likely to know about the prohibition against premarital sex than the atheist, even if they do not agree with it.

The trouble with nationalists is that they are atheist antisemites and Islamophobes who would rather die than even be seen to be investigating the religion of those they hate and fear with any show of objective impartiality.

Everything about feminism undermines marriage. Patriarchy cannot exist without marriage. Without the patriarchy, not enough good strong men will be produced to defend the national interest. If Western men were mostly Christian husbands and fathers of legitimate offspring, they wouldn't and needn't put up with the matriarchy for even a minute.

Without the family and a functioning religion, men are atomised and competing against each other for the sexual favours of immoral women, incapable of co-operating with each other to deal with their internal enemies: sluts and socialists.

Without patriarchy there is no hierarchy and therefore no accountability.

A matriarchy is basically buck-passing politicians who will blame other buck-passing politicians where the apparent leader is really not in control of anything and cannot rely on the loyalty of beta males to support him. This makes him cowardly, hesitant and cautious and also means nothing much will be done in Trump's term of office.

Without patriarchy, no one in a senior political position will stick his neck out to defend the beta males below. Enoch Powell and Keith Joseph tried to point out the obvious, but had their careers destroyed.

Because courage and truth is not rewarded, no more politicians will speak it on your behalves.

Not only is pointing out the obvious unrewarded, it will get you ignored even by the people who are supposed to be on your side who cannot bear to accept the truth either.

The problem with atheism is that the atheist can only think in terms of his own life and does not care what happens after he is dead, especially if he has no biological investment in the next generation.

Most white nationalists are atheist unmarriageable bachelors which means they are easily intimidated and bribed.

Without religion, there is no possibility of enjoying the inter-generational co-operation that Jews and Muslims enjoy which means each generation of nationalists has to more or less reinvent the wheel.

Often, I feel that nationalists of the previous generation would actually hate to see the younger generation succeed where they have failed.

As far as the younger generation are concerned, they are now so atomised that they cannot form a political party or even discuss anything other than what they imagine their YouTube subscribers want to hear.

And this is why none of them will talk to me. It is abuse of power really, but they don't see anything wrong with that either.

If you really are a political activist, you owe it to your cause to seek the truth and operate on logic, guided by your principles. This is the very least that is required.

Sexual corruption leads to moral corruption.

Moral corruption leads to intellectual corruption.

Intellectual corruption leads to the inability to form logical conclusions based on indisputable facts and solve political problems guided by moral principles. Only those from a religious background practising family values would have internalised the categorical imperative to have principles and follow them. The illegitimate, singly parented and the badly schooled will find this almost impossible to do, however patient you are with him. Believe me, I have tried.

The degenerate who has difficulty understanding the nature and purpose of principles will have greater difficulty applying them if they their morality is non-existent. Most of them will have difficulty even recognising a situation when the exercise of principle is required, because they are accustomed to responding instinctively and thoughtlessly to the promptings of their baser appetites. If sex is offered, they will take it, even if they have already said they are not looking for a relationship and would even agree with you that immoral women who are also bad parents of illegitimate offspring cause the social problems of immigration they are always complaining about.

Such degenerates are only left with denial, apathy and the stated intention to leave the country if it all gets too much to bear.  

They psychology of social workers

What is what one thing you would say about women with a degree in psychology?

Why do so many women do psychology? It is like someone whose first language is French doing a GCSE in French - a doddle and an extra GCSE.

Psychology is therefore an easy degree together with the social sciences which are especially favoured by women who want to feel safe doing the subjects they think suits their interests and inclinations.

What do female graduates of psychology do after they graduate? They become a social worker with a degree in a related field.

What do social workers who are predominantly female do? They support the creation of social problems they know is their bread and butter.

What are the social problems social workers support? The criminal consequences of immoral women being bad parents to their illegitimate offspring supplies them with endless work.

The great thing about this work which immoral women create which the female worker will never criticise is that it makes men look bad. Men when angry become aggressive, violent and criminal easily making them seem to be the problem.

The women who were the original cause of this anger by opening their legs to some man who pumped and dumped them, and who are undeniably fornicating sluts who brought their illegitimate misbegotten sons into being do not get blamed, even if they were such bad mothers they abandoned their children into care homes and their abandoned children became the victims of child sex predators. Instead, they get sympathy and understanding from the social worker.

When Enoch Powell talked about this country piling up its own funeral pyre in relation to immigration, this was not the worst of it. Indeed, the funeral pyre is being heaped higher and more quickly now with more female undergraduates taking over university life and demanding that male undergraduates comply with their whims. Their latest thing is the use of gender neutral pronouns to encourage more men into transgenderism with the purpose of destroying their masculinity at university, if it has not already been destroyed at school or infancy.  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/01/bbc-childrens-director-says-she-is-proud-of-transgender-programm/

Cambridge University Student Union Officers

Plymouth University Student Union Officers - how many of these female student union officers are doing psychology?

Oxford University Student Union Officers

http://www.independent.co.uk/student/news/oxford-university-students-gender-neutral-pronouns-peter-tatchell-student-union-ze-xe-a7470196.html

If daughters of these immoral women become violent, aggressive and themselves immoral, they are already armed with the excuses that are always given to women.

The female social worker either consciously knows this, or is at least subconsciously aware of the operation of cause and effect which she will of course never admit to herself, let alone out loud to another human being.

So, while she complains about the state of the nation, about immigrants, especially Muslims, she will never ever consider the real cause of social problems: immoral women who are fornicating sluts with variously fathered illegitimate offspring, or say anything that might suggest she is criticising these immoral women.

Why, she is probably one herself.

The supreme function of statesmanship is to provide against preventable evils

'The supreme function of statesmanship is to provide against preventable evils. In seeking to do so, it encounters obstacles which are deeply rooted in human nature.
One is that by the very order of things such evils are not demonstrable until they have occurred: at each stage in their onset there is room for doubt and for dispute whether they be real or imaginary. By the same token, they attract little attention in comparison with current troubles, which are both indisputable and pressing: whence the besetting temptation of all politics to concern itself with the immediate present at the expense of the future.

Above all, people are disposed to mistake predicting troubles for causing troubles and even for desiring troubles: "If only," they love to think, "if only people wouldn't talk about it, it probably wouldn't happen."

Perhaps this habit goes back to the primitive belief that the word and the thing, the name and the object, are identical.

At all events, the discussion of future grave but, with effort now, avoidable evils is the most unpopular and at the same time the most necessary occupation for the politician. Those who knowingly shirk it deserve, and not infrequently receive, the curses of those who come after.'

OUR POST-TRUTH SOCIETY

But how can you exercise this supreme function of statesmanship in a post-truth society? A post-truth society is a matriarchy, and a matriarchy is dominated by stupid immoral women and the male politicians who pander to them in an environment of indiscriminate universal suffrage, terrified of alienating the female vote and accused of "mansplaining". These immoral and irresponsible women will not be moved by truth, logic or morality, only by false promises, threats and lies. They respond only to fear of punishment, prospect of gain and are bribed with legislation to protect and privilege them, giving them more rights on the public purse that only increase the voracity of their parasitism.

People deserve the government they get. Please, God, let us no longer be the stinking degenerate matriarchy that we already are.

Deuteronomy 28: Curses for Disobedience

15 However, if you do not obey the Lord your God and do not carefully follow all his commands and decrees I am giving you today, all these curses will come on you and overtake you:
16 You will be cursed in the city and cursed in the country.
17 Your basket and your kneading trough will be cursed.
18 The fruit of your womb will be cursed, and the crops of your land, and the calves of your herds and the lambs of your flocks.
19 You will be cursed when you come in and cursed when you go out.
20 The Lord will send on you curses, confusion and rebuke in everything you put your hand to, until you are destroyed and come to sudden ruin because of the evil you have done in forsaking him.[a] 21 The Lord will plague you with diseases until he has destroyed you from the land you are entering to possess. 22 The Lord will strike you with wasting disease, with fever and inflammation, with scorching heat and drought, with blight and mildew, which will plague you until you perish. 23 The sky over your head will be bronze, the ground beneath you iron. 24 The Lord will turn the rain of your country into dust and powder; it will come down from the skies until you are destroyed.
25 The Lord will cause you to be defeated before your enemies. You will come at them from one direction but flee from them in seven, and you will become a thing of horror to all the kingdoms on earth. 26 Your carcasses will be food for all the birds and the wild animals, and there will be no one to frighten them away. 27 The Lord will afflict you with the boils of Egypt and with tumors, festering sores and the itch, from which you cannot be cured. 28 The Lord will afflict you with madness, blindness and confusion of mind. 29 At midday you will grope about like a blind person in the dark. You will be unsuccessful in everything you do; day after day you will be oppressed and robbed, with no one to rescue you.
30 You will be pledged to be married to a woman, but another will take her and rape her. You will build a house, but you will not live in it. You will plant a vineyard, but you will not even begin to enjoy its fruit. 31 Your ox will be slaughtered before your eyes, but you will eat none of it. Your donkey will be forcibly taken from you and will not be returned. Your sheep will be given to your enemies, and no one will rescue them. 32 Your sons and daughters will be given to another nation, and you will wear out your eyes watching for them day after day, powerless to lift a hand. 33 A people that you do not know will eat what your land and labor produce, and you will have nothing but cruel oppression all your days. 34 The sights you see will drive you mad. 35 The Lord will afflict your knees and legs with painful boils that cannot be cured, spreading from the soles of your feet to the top of your head.
36 The Lord will drive you and the king you set over you to a nation unknown to you or your ancestors. There you will worship other gods, gods of wood and stone. 37 You will become a thing of horror, a byword and an object of ridicule among all the peoples where the Lord will drive you.
38 You will sow much seed in the field but you will harvest little, because locusts will devour it. 39 You will plant vineyards and cultivate them but you will not drink the wine or gather the grapes, because worms will eat them. 40 You will have olive trees throughout your country but you will not use the oil, because the olives will drop off. 41 You will have sons and daughters but you will not keep them, because they will go into captivity. 42 Swarms of locusts will take over all your trees and the crops of your land.
43 The foreigners who reside among you will rise above you higher and higher, but you will sink lower and lower. 44 They will lend to you, but you will not lend to them. They will be the head, but you will be the tail.
45 All these curses will come on you. They will pursue you and overtake you until you are destroyed, because you did not obey the Lord your God and observe the commands and decrees he gave you. 46 They will be a sign and a wonder to you and your descendants forever. 47 Because you did not serve the Lord your God joyfully and gladly in the time of prosperity, 48 therefore in hunger and thirst, in nakedness and dire poverty, you will serve the enemies the Lord sends against you. He will put an iron yoke on your neck until he has destroyed you.
49 The Lord will bring a nation against you from far away, from the ends of the earth, like an eagle swooping down, a nation whose language you will not understand, 50 a fierce-looking nation without respect for the old or pity for the young. 51 They will devour the young of your livestock and the crops of your land until you are destroyed. They will leave you no grain, new wine or olive oil, nor any calves of your herds or lambs of your flocks until you are ruined. 52 They will lay siege to all the cities throughout your land until the high fortified walls in which you trust fall down. They will besiege all the cities throughout the land the Lord your God is giving you.
53 Because of the suffering your enemy will inflict on you during the siege, you will eat the fruit of the womb, the flesh of the sons and daughters the Lord your God has given you. 54 Even the most gentle and sensitive man among you will have no compassion on his own brother or the wife he loves or his surviving children, 55 and he will not give to one of them any of the flesh of his children that he is eating. It will be all he has left because of the suffering your enemy will inflict on you during the siege of all your cities. 56 The most gentle and sensitive woman among you—so sensitive and gentle that she would not venture to touch the ground with the sole of her foot—will begrudge the husband she loves and her own son or daughter 57 the afterbirth from her womb and the children she bears. For in her dire need she intends to eat them secretly because of the suffering your enemy will inflict on you during the siege of your cities.
58 If you do not carefully follow all the words of this law, which are written in this book, and do not revere this glorious and awesome name—the Lord your God— 59 the Lord will send fearful plagues on you and your descendants, harsh and prolonged disasters, and severe and lingering illnesses. 60 He will bring on you all the diseases of Egypt that you dreaded, and they will cling to you. 61 The Lord will also bring on you every kind of sickness and disaster not recorded in this Book of the Law, until you are destroyed. 62 You who were as numerous as the stars in the sky will be left but few in number, because you did not obey the Lord your God. 63 Just as it pleased the Lord to make you prosper and increase in number, so it will please him to ruin and destroy you. You will be uprooted from the land you are entering to possess.
64 Then the Lord will scatter you among all nations, from one end of the earth to the other. There you will worship other gods—gods of wood and stone, which neither you nor your ancestors have known. 65 Among those nations you will find no repose, no resting place for the sole of your foot. There the Lord will give you an anxious mind, eyes weary with longing, and a despairing heart. 66 You will live in constant suspense, filled with dread both night and day, never sure of your life. 67 In the morning you will say, “If only it were evening!” and in the evening, “If only it were morning!”—because of the terror that will fill your hearts and the sights that your eyes will see. 68 The Lord will send you back in ships to Egypt on a journey I said you should never make again. There you will offer yourselves for sale to your enemies as male and female slaves, but no one will buy you.

"God does not change the lot of a people unless they change what is in their hearts." Koran 13:11

"O you who believe! surely from among your wives and your children there is an enemy to you; therefore beware of them; and if you pardon and forbear and forgive, then surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful." Koran 64:14

"Cursed are the unmerciful, fornicators, and adulterers, covetous persons, idolaters, slanderers, drunkards, and extortioners." The Book of Common Prayer

"A healthy nation is as unconscious of its nationality as a healthy man is of his bones. But if you break a nation’s nationality it will think of nothing else but getting it set again."  George Bernard Shaw

"Out of the corruption of women proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil." 
"Out of the corruption of SLUTS proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil." 
"Out of the corruption of TOLERATING SLUTS AND BASTARDS proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil." The Bhagavad Gita

How chasing the female vote increased our taxes and the size of the state while reducing our liberties

Listen to the superb intellectual sparring between Frost and Powell in 1969. It couldn't happen now, could it? The British in 1969 had Frost. In 2016 they have Evan Davis, who is gaily married, pretending Donald Trump has incestuous intentions towards his daughter, who was then ticked off by an American woman for taking things literally. I still remember Weekend World on LWT when it was presented by Brian Walden and Matthew Parris - an hour-long programme during which issues could be properly thrashed out instead of the pap we now have. The short interviews we now have is intended to cover up the fact that our politicians these days are clueless unprincipled twerps who prefer to be told what to do, and to do it without being questioned too much.

Researchers say Western IQs dropped 14 points over last century

In what year will Britain be 100% learning disabled?

The Bible endorses Nationalism. https://t.co/2n2ij7Er9K

— Brett Stevens (@amerika_blog) November 18, 2016

Paul Gascoigne should have fought for the right of Englishmen to tell racist jokes all the way up to the Supreme Court

http://www.expressandstar.com/news/crime/2016/09/19/paul-gascoigne-pleads-guilty-over-racist-joke-at-wolverhamptons-civic-hall/

While it is clearly racist and false to suggest that a black man's teeth would glow in the dark while a white man's wouldn't, which Act of Parliament forbade the telling of racist jokes? Is a freeborn Englishman still entitled to assume that what is not forbidden is allowed, or must he check with a woman every time he decides to say or do anything? So when exactly did the rules change?
 
Gazza was being prosecuted under s 5 of the Public Order Act 1986.  The purpose of that Act 1986 is to preserve public order. Telling a racist joke in Wolverhampton Civic Hall in no way threatened public order. Therefore the prosecution of Gazza by the CPS headed by feminazi Directrix of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders was obviously politically motivated.

It is politically motivated because it was not in the public interest to worsen race relations. How is it in the public interest to make the white man feel that the black man has the whip hand over him in his own country, as Enoch Powell warned would happen if immigration was not controlled?

Can you imagine the PC CPS seriously considering a white man's complaint about a black man telling a joke about white men and humiliating him in public? Of course not. The femimazi DPP would send him away with a flea in his ear.

Why Females Prefer Immigrant Males

http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21688397-absorb-newcomers-peacefully-europe-must-insist-they-respect-values-such-tolerance-and Did a woman write this? I think we should be told.

What does this politically-motivated prosecution reveal about the position of the white man in his own land? That he is lower in status than the black man and certainly lower in status than his women, who despise him.

Feminazis are after all white middle class women who fear and loathe white working class men angry enough to vote BNP or at least UKIP.

Feminazis pose a far greater threat to white working men than Muslims, but white plebs are too Islamophobic to see this or to see that only Islam will be strong enough to eradicate feminism. After feminism is eradicated, men will finally be able to wrest back control of a government that now prioritises the preferences of immoral parasitical women at their expense.

If we don't watch out, feminazis in charge of Government Departments will soon be declaring that using the word "feminazi" is misogyny, and misogyny is THOUGHTCRIME punishable by fines, loss of liberty, manual amputation, castration and perhaps even the death penalty.

The American working man has Donald Trump to represent him, but British male MPs are too stupid, skint and scared to challenge the matriarchy. Philip Davies MP is only one man anyway, and very from being a billionaire. He also voted for Andrea Leadsom rather than Michael Gove to be Tory leader which suggests that his judgement is not infallible. It is to be doubted he will do much for men all by himself while other male Tory MPs cower and quake at the thought of Theresa May frowning at them.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tory-mp-philip-davies-says-militant-feminists-dont-really-believe-in-equality-unless-it-suits-them-a7191946.html

Philip Davies MP - the only male MP in the UK not too afraid to challenge the matriarchy

Remainders have capitalised on the death of Jo Cox, leavers can do so too

I suggest using the tactic of "Look what you made me do."

Jo Cox and her ilk would not have hesitated to call anyone who dared complain about immigration a racist. That was always how polarised the debate has been. How long has the immigration debate has been simmering? I would say since Powell made his Rivers of Blood speech in 20 April 1968. The killing of Cox on 16 June 2016 represented the multicultural and multiracial melting pot boiling over. Of course, there have been inner city riots since 1968, but this is the first time an MP actually suffered directly as a result of ignoring the concerns of voters.

Apparently, Breivik murdering 69 summer campers wasn't sufficient warning in 2011 because no politicians were harmed, only the youth members of the Workers' Youth League. This should have been taken as a warning to anyone who has ever thought they could just carry on denouncing anyone who ever dares to complain as racist dinosaurs to shut them up, but still they carried on employing that tactic.

Mr Cox’s wife, Jo, is a Labour MP and former aide to Mr Brown’s wife Sarah. Mrs Cox also runs the Labour Women’s Network where she is ‘equalities and discrimination’ adviser.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3298572/New-charity-scandal-Save-Children-executive-quits-women-s-complaints-inappropriate-behaviour.html#ixzz4C3OIalmv

An imaginary conversation between a recipient of Save the Children charity and its former CEO Justin Forsyth

It was probably Jo Cox who put it into Gordon Brown's head to call anyone who dared complain about immigration "bigoted", as he called called Mrs Gillian Duffy, a Labour member.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2010/apr/28/gordon-brown-gillian-duffy-transcript

Her plea for her constituents to vote remain still has no solutions or words of comfort whatsoever. It is still "Put up and shut up, you plebs. They will keep coming whether you like it or not, whether we're in or out. You have no choice, and you know it. Now shut it."

http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/opinion/jo-cox-brexit-is-no-answer-to-real-concerns-on-immigration-1-7956822#ixzz4BA42bFd8http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/opinion/jo-cox-brexit-is-no-answer-to-real-concerns-on-immigration-1-7956822

Just like IRA terrorism, politicians only responded when they perceived themselves to be directly threatened eg after the Brighton Bomb in 1984. When was the Anglo-Irish Agreement signed? 1985.

Leavers should point this out rather than be intimidated into silence and pulling their punches. Whatever the result, there's going to be trouble anyway.

It is time for the British to gird their loins, grit their teeth and bite the bullet.

Why some British men do the Nazi salute

So #mair had no extremist views which could lead to a terror act? Just a nice guy who meant well? #JoCoxMP pic.twitter.com/3apFjGfgJu

— Hasan Patel (@Hasanpatel) June 18, 2016

It was later noticed that the man in this photo is not Mair. 

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/06/17/britain-first-eyewitness-bnp-member-list/

@Hasanpatel @ntfem pic.twitter.com/3bo1R3HVUX

— #LeaveEU Holborn (@SuperOldHolborn) June 18, 2016

@Hasanpatel A brit being a Hitler fan is one of the most silly things that can be. It just makes me cringe.

— Commandelicious (@Abtacha) June 18, 2016

@Abtacha @Hasanpatel They are probably saying "We didn't fight the Germans to be taken over by darkies" or words to that effect.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) June 18, 2016

Jo Cox and her ilk would not have hesitated to call anyone who dared complain about immigration a racist. That was always how polarised the debate has been. How long has the immigration debate has been simmering? I would say since Powell made his Rivers of Blood speech in 20 April 1968. The killing of Cox on 16 June 2016 represented the multicultural and multiracial melting pot boiling over. Of course, there have been inner city riots since 1968, but this is the first time an MP actually suffered directly as a result of ignoring the concerns of voters.

Mr Cox’s wife, Jo, is a Labour MP and former aide to Mr Brown’s wife Sarah. Mrs Cox also runs the Labour Women’s Network where she is ‘equalities and discrimination’ adviser.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3298572/New-charity-scandal-Save-Children-executive-quits-women-s-complaints-inappropriate-behaviour.html#ixzz4C3OIalmv

It was probably Jo Cox who put it into Gordon Brown's head to call anyone who dared complain about immigration "bigoted", as he called called Mrs Gillian Duffy, a Labour member.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2010/apr/28/gordon-brown-gillian-duffy-transcript

Her plea for her constituents to vote remain still has no solutions or words of comfort whatsoever. It is still "Put up and shut up, you plebs. They will keep coming whether you like it or not, whether we're in or out. You have no choice, and you know it. Now shut it."

http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/opinion/jo-cox-brexit-is-no-answer-to-real-concerns-on-immigration-1-7956822#ixzz4BA42bFd8http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/opinion/jo-cox-brexit-is-no-answer-to-real-concerns-on-immigration-1-7956822

On those who keep wittering on about the British constitution as if they knew what they were on about

We have a Bill of Rights 1688/9. Common Law since Alfred the Great. Justice is not a fashion statement, it is an emerging shield for us all.

— Godfrey Bloom (@goddersbloom) May 11, 2015

@goddersbloom An important primer to watch: http://t.co/ng788J0FaG

— eddie coke (@eddiecoke) May 11, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom If we were a 1-party state, its constitution would really be the party constitution protecting its members' rights.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom There is nothing special about the idea of putting promises down in writing hoping it will be a binding contract.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom Many constitutionalists do not understand that our politicians' rights need to be protected.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom Because politicians are so despised, nobody cares that they have no right to free speech.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom Those who admire Enoch Powell should reflect on what happened to him for telling what he thought to be the truth.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom Those who think politicians should speak the truth more should reflect on what happened to Keith Joseph in 1974.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Joseph#1974

“A high and rising proportion of children are being born to mothers least fitted to bring children into the world.... Some are of low intelligence, most of low educational attainment. They are unlikely to be able to give children the stable emotional background, the consistent combination of love and firmness…. They are producing problem children…. The balance of our human stock, is threatened….”

The response was outrage that despite his repeated apologies sharply undercut Joseph's campaign to replace Heath as party leader. The speech was largely written by Alfred Sherman but the most controversial sentence was inserted by Joseph himself.

It has now 41 years since a male politician dared to criticise Slut Single Mothers who are bad mothers to their bastard offspring. Expecting this lot to start doing it now would be like expecting a drug-addict who only cares about his next fix to call the cops on his drug-dealer. Ain't gonna happen. Only Secular Koranism is strong enough to cleanse this country of so many decades of sluttery, bastardy and degeneracy as well as five generations of feckless fuckers. 

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom Talking about limiting the power of the monarch is now irrelevant as talking about the divine right to rule.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom If politicians fear to express what they believe to be the truth then they are not fit for purpose.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom The point I am making about the free speech of MPs can be found at http://t.co/e5TDEO9iul

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

If members of the Conservative Party have no rights and can have their membership cancelled at the absolute discretion of the Secretary of the Board of the  Conservative Party, then this must also mean that the Prime Minister himself is vulnerable to being expelled from the Conservative Party without ceremony.

Claire Khaw's membership of the Conservative Party cancelled

The Conservative Party has no principles and its members have no rights

The Conservative Party pretends it has principles

Why the Conservative Party is a public body whose administrative decisions should be subject to judicial review

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom A political establishment that has no principles or morals is no different to a psychopath.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom A psychopath is a person who has no conscience and no moral principles and does not care if he hurts people.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom It used to be the case that the Archbishop of Canterbury was the conscience of the monarch or government.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom The C of E was created precisely to serve the monarch as a Creature of the State.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom The C of E is now a creature of the PC Liberal State and the PC Liberal State believes in gay marriage.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom The C of E is stuffed to its rafters with feminists, Reds, LGBTs n those who don't give a damn about Xtian teaching

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom C of E is stuffed to its rafters with parasites living off it whose raison d'etre is to subvert Biblical teaching.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom A constitution is basically a rule book n the best rule book is short, clear and IN ONE BOOK not all over the place

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom The old debate was about preventing monarchs who claimed to rule by divine right from abusing their power.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom The current debate ought to be about drafting a constitution that would bring about good government.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom The best constitution is a rule book that is clear, short n in one book whose words and meaning are not in dispute.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom Liberty is what we ought to have after all the necessary laws are in place. What are the necessary laws?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom Talking about "repealing the rule of law" is nonsensical. The rule of law is just means following the law.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom The debate on Legal Positivism and Natural Law should be revived now that Islamists are proposing a theocracy.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

Redefining the terms of the Natural Law v Legal Positivism debate

What the debate between Natural Law v Legal Positivism should really be about - Theocracy v Secularism

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom It would be helpful to have the principles of good government articulated and explained, would it not?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom Is good government synonymous with democracy? Only if most voters are wise but they are patently fools and knaves.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom Is good government synonymous with the majority view of MPs? But they too are mostly fools and knaves.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom The speaker is not classically educated or he would know Ancient Rome and Greece would elect tyrants and dictators.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyrant

The original Greek term, however, merely meant an authoritarian sovereign without reference to character, bearing no pejorative connotation during the Archaic and early Classical periods. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictator

The word originated as the title of a magistrate in ancient Rome appointed by the Senate to rule the republic in times of emergency.

There is much talk of a Caliphate, which I believe means Regent of God. It is basically a dictator who is bound by Koranic principles. Better government by a rightly-guided Caliph, I would have thought, than government by a psychopathic political establishment suffering from dementia not bound by any principles, not even their own, which they will not or cannot state. When you start breaking your own rules and lying about what they were and why you break them, I think it is time you called it a day.

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom How do we know when we have good government? When politicians are not widely held in hatred, ridicule and contempt.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom You can have any kind of rule in your rule book but a rule is only as good as its interpreter and enforcer.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom EC of Human Rights affirms freedom of belief but in EU countries Holocaust Denial is an imprisonable offence.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom The Equality Act 2010 is clearly Orwellian thought-crime legislation but libertarians pretend not to notice.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

@eddiecoke @goddersbloom The price of liberty is eternal vigilance, but we are all suffering from narcolepsy, it seems.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 12, 2015

Jonathan Bowden: Tolerance & Empire, Leftist Delusions, Islamification, Labour Liars, British Future

Full text: bin Laden's 'letter to America'

Swinton Circle speakers: Lord Viscount of Massarene & Ferrard and Simon Heffer

Tuesday 19^th March 2013
Alan Harvey with the Viscount Massarene and Ferrard

Tuesday 19^th March 2013
Sarsons vinegar bottles used as paperweights, or should I say "flagweights"?

Tuesday 19^th March 2013
“The Decline of Europe and the Western World, and what the future holds” 

Tuesday 19^th March 2013
Viscount Massarene's talk consisted of a trot through English history.  If only I had heard it when I was doing  History A level!

23^rd April 2013  –  St.George’s Day
Robin Willow, the minstrel before Simon Heffer talking about Powell.  I asked Heffer which actor he would most like playing the part of Powell if ever the BBC adapted his biography of  Enoch Powell LIKE THE ROMAN.  He said Eric Porter after saying that that was as unlikely as a pig flying to the moon.  I also asked him which Tory MP he would most like to see replace David Cameron and he admitted he didn't know.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Like-The-Roman-Enoch-Powell/dp/0297842862

Years ago at the 50th Desert Island Discs Party, he nearly entered the room we were in.  I remember him standing at the threshold, with the light behind him, looking alarming like the Messiah.  His eyes swept the room to see a friendly face.   I was a slip of a girl then, and wondered what I would say to him if we were ever introduced to each other.  I don't think he found a friendly face, and it seemed he left the party without speaking to anyone.  I later popped my head out of the room to see if he was still there, but he had gone.

How I remember the group joshing Melvyn Bragg about his TV series A Time To Dance, saying "It wasn't that bad!"

Years later, I met Pam Powell at the memorial service for Lord Harris of High Cross of the IEA.  This was at St John's in Smith Square. I had arrived early and had sat down.  Mrs Powell then arrived with her two friends and Christopher Gill asked if I wouldn't mind moving so they could all sit together.  I was delighted to do this for her.  After the service was over, Pam Powell herself came round and thanked me for giving up my seat, which I certainly did not expect.  It was then that I felt a sudden and profound connection with the late Powell, thinking how much he must have loved her for being such a proper memsahib, for being so charming and for being so gracious. They don't make Englishwomen like her any more.

Eric Porter

23^rd April 2013  –  St.George’s Day
Robin Willow singing in Mandarin

Harriet Sergeant does not condemn the causes of crime and gang culture - SLUT SINGLE MUMS

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2163396/A-middle-class-mother-hoodies.html

Titillating photograph of Harriet Sergeant and her boys from the hood gives publicity to her potboiler that does NOT condemn illegitimacy

http://harrietsergeant.com/articles/fixing-broken-britain/

Below is what she says about illegitimacy:

Despite the huge amount of evidence of the harm this causes children (mothers of children on the “at risk” register, for example, are five times more likely to be single teenage mothers), the Labour government made single motherhood an attractive proposition.

Since 1997 a single mother of two children has seen her benefits increase by 85%. We watched the effects of that policy play out on our streets every night last week.

To accuse these young girls of being feckless is unjust. They are merely responding to the economics of the situation. They are as much victims of the crisis in our schools and the perverse influence of benefits as teenage boys. What future is there for a girl who leaves school without a qualification? Whereas boys take to crime, girls get pregnant.

Ministers talk of family breakdown, but there is no family to break down. More than half of single mothers have never lived with a boyfriend. The state has taken over the role of both husband and employer.

Take just one example: single mothers. Mash’s older sister, a single mother of 22, admitted she would love to get married: “But all the men I know are in prison or deal drugs. I don’t know one man with a job.”

Like all the people and organisations she complains about, Harriet Sergeant only proposes to deal with the SYMPTOMS but not the causes, probably because she a dirty rotten feminist IN DENIAL about the causes of crime and gang culture - stupid sluts opening their legs at the drop of a pair of trousers and disdaining to practice effective contraception because they want to progress on the slut ladder of becoming a welfare mum with variously fathered feral bastards which the taxpaying men of Paedo Bastard Britain Fatso Slutland are too limp-dicked to protest.

Harriet Sergeant - tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime?  Not bloody likely.   She is a woman after all, and will probably defend to the death the right of sluts to have babies at the expense of the taxpayer because she is a woman herself.  She has a son, but does she care enough about him to denounce feminism?  

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2164185/The-day-Kray-gang-robber-taught-hoodie-crime-doesnt-pay-The-middle-class-mother-befriended-teenage-thugs-dressed-suit-encounter-shocked-core.html

Nope, nothing here either about what to do with scummy slut single mums who breed their verminous spawn who will become the criminals of the next generation.  Not a dicky bird.

Maybe the next one, eh?

Her book is now being serialised in the Mail, so give her a chance.  She may possibly get round to mentioning SLUT SINGLE MUMS which I suspect her feminine feminist sympathies will probably prevent her from criticising.  She probably has quite a few friends who are also slut single mums and she doesn't want to hurt their feelings.  Girls stick together at the expense of boys, even mothers who have sons want to keep all the feminist privileges they have acquired at the expense of men, even if that will fuck up their sons' futures and the future of their own country.

That's shitty stinking fucking evil feminist ideology for you, eh?

If nothing about criticising slut single mums come out in the other parts of her serialised book, perhaps some might think she deserves the fate of Marie Antoinette whom she so strikingly resembles.

Harriet says there is a whole chapter devoted to the subject of single mums in her book, out 12 July.   I will make a point of popping into Waterstone's to see if there is anything at all constructive being proposed about dealing with the causes and consequences of state-sponsored slut single mummery.

http://www.teachit.so/index_htm_files/Wasted.pdf has a book written by Harriet with a chapter devoted to single mums, from page 19.   Nothing was proposed however, about stigmatising these women or even endorsing the Just Say No recommendation of Nadine Dorries MP.

Let us hope the chapter on single mums in her new book is rather more constructive.  Then I will happily eat my words and hat about Harriet being an evil feminist who refuses to criticise the morals of British women just because she is one herself.

I may even attend the book launch, if I am not escorted off the premises by her minders who may consist of members the gang she has been hanging out with.   If so, I may even buy a copy and ask her to to dedicate it 'To Claire "Robespierre" Khaw, With love and best wishes from Harriet "Marie Antoinette" Sergeant'

When Enoch Powell talked about a nation busily engaged in heaping up their own funeral pyre, he didn't know the half of it.