THE VOICE OF REASON
Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
The White House Koran belonged to Thomas Jefferson and it was he who drafted the Virginia statute of religious freedom which later became the First Amendment.
When Nietzsche said in the 1870s that "God is dead and we have killed him", he meant Liberals had killed the Trinitarian belief that Jesus is God in the Kulturkampf.
But Liberalism is know killing itself by stealing the election from Trump.
When Liberal Democrats have to cheat, lie and steal to get the election result they want, it means they neither believe in their own principles nor follow them.
This unprincipled corruption is sensed by China who is now kicking America's Australian poodle to see what Washington will do next, after the Americans finally decide who their President is on 20 January 2021.
Whoever is is deemed to have won the election by the Supreme Court will be regarded as a lame duck and so would any President who inherits her position from a lame duck President.
"Recent polls show that roughly 75% of Jewish Americans identify as Democrats."
Are Democrat voters - both Jew and gentile - the enemy within?
Is there something deeply dysfunctional about representative democracy?
Should America become a one-party state like China to avoid pointless and bitter divisions within American society now that its religion has failed?
Since Trump has already identified himself as Nationalist, then the Culture War raging across America is about whether America should be nationalist or liberal, but what does liberalism mean now except
1) neoliberalism (open borders)
2) neoconservatism (endless foreign wars)
3) sexual liberation from the rules of marriage and good parenting
4) BLM and feminist intersectionality?
Putin pointed out in June 2019 that liberalism is "obsolete". Not only is liberalism obsolete, Christianity is also kaput.
Americans needs a government of national unity and only the irrational and irresponsible would vote for an obviously senile man.
Let us hope Trump has frightened enough Americans - both Jew and gentile - from voting for a man obviously suffering from senile dementia as a display of hatred towards a man who has given up a peaceful retirement just to assert the principle of government in the national interest, which is how nationalism should now be defined.
For observant Jews, sharia would just be a walk in the park. According to the Talmud, righteous gentiles are only required to observe the Naohide laws, while Jews are required to observe 613 laws. The Noahide laws are a minimum moral standard for gentiles. Observant Jews should have no difficulty agreeing to living under sharia because that is already a significantly lower standard than their 613 laws.
The problem is that most Jews are not observant and the majority are Liberal Democrat voting Jews who now want to topple Trump by toppling the statues of the American Founding Fathers. Trump, by relocating the US Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, has stuck his neck out to an unprecedented and some would say unnecessary extent.
It would be interesting to see how many liberal principles are in direct conflict with the principles of Judaism.
How many Liberal Jews are there to every observant Jew?
Which is the more authentic Jew - the Observant Jew or the Liberal Jew?
If Liberal Jews are the majority, does this mean that the Observant Jew can never be an archetype of Jewishness? But without Judaism, Jews wouldn't even exist. It can therefore be concluded that being the majority is no way linked to whether you are right, even if you are Jewish.
Do liberals even know what their principles are now?
Jews are in a better position to know what their principles are and can look them up if they don't, but liberals these days support no principle other than that of sexual liberation from the rules of marriage and good parenting and the maligning of the achievements of their own ancestors. If all Jews followed liberal principles such as can be discerned from the current practice of those who identify themselves as liberal eg globohomo, they would soon become extinct. It is possible that God would allow Jews to become extinct once they have done what they were supposed to do ie impose a minimum standard of law and morality on the rest of the world through the setting of standards, but the time is not now, because Western gentile nations are very far from being Noahide. Israel's protector, America, in fact promotes globohomo, which is arguably satanic, if Satan can be defined as rebellion from God's laws.
Is Trump holding the wrong book and standing outside the wrong building?
Should Trump be standing outside this building and holding up the Koran instead?
Is Christianity kaput? I think it would make much more sense if Trump had held up the Koran and talked about how Americans are going to wake up under a Secular Koranist America after martial law. Black political activists such as Muhammad Ali and Malcolm X saw Islam as a solution to their racial discrimination. White Americans who want to restore the patriarchy should see Secular Koranism as a solution to theirs. After all, the kneeling nonsense of American policemen and National Guardsmen is a consequence of living in a matriarchy.
Church of Entropy, a woman known for being dominant over the thirsty men who submit to her has confessed to "the bliss of religious submission". I mention her in particular because she is a figure in the alt-right who claims to be an incarnation of a Hindu sage and proposes establishing a caste system claiming that White Americans are really descended from Indians who moved to Europe and then turned white. She also wants Britain to pay reparations to India for having colonised them.
Church of Entropy talking about kneeling before rioters and looters:
"I don't know exactly how to describe it. The closest I could think of it is like the bliss of religious submission."
In a matriarchy, men instinctively know to think like women so they can compete with each other to anticipate and satisfy feminine preferences in order to gain sexual access or social advancement.
What I have described is the nature and consequence of feminised men: kneeling policemen, kneeling National Guardsmen, cucking Californians who will kneel in no time to rioters and looters when asked to do so.
In a matriarchy, all men are lower in status to the unmarried mother and this includes POTUS. Until Trump is brave enough to hold a Koran in front of a mosque and propose that the Koran guide the American constitution and by extension its government, Americans will get no peace in their declining and degenerate matriarchy of feminised men, kneeling policemen and kneeling National Guardsmen.
Look at the love! One day white women will look on me with similar gratitude and affection for Secular Koranism which will give them more rights than White Sharia!
White men will also adore and revere me for saving their civilisation and solving the problem of their trouble-making women!
All they have to do is dump democracy and establish a slut-shaming theocracy and narrow the franchise to taxpayers only to disenfranchise a burgeoning parasitic class.
Taxpaying citizens would have the constitutional right not to pay more than a flat rate income tax of 20% and all totalitarian thoughtcrime anti-discrimination legislation would be repealed as being unIslamic according to 2:256 of the Koran.
The low-waged would be relieved of the burden of paying taxes and of voting.
All this can be done with only minor adjustments to the US constitution.
They are also afraid of being accused of a historic sexual offence where a possibly false accusation is as good as a conviction in degenerate feminised Western nations who have lost their Judeo-Christian heritage and forgotten the usefulness of the rule at Deuteronomy 19:15.
The entire West is now a matriarchy. In a matriarchy, all men without exception are lower in status than an immoral unmarried mother. This includes President Trump, I am afraid.
Until he has the courage to denounce these immoral women to stop them and others who will soon do as they do and become unmarried mothers and part of the parasitic class if they are not firmly discouraged, nothing will change and the West will continue its downward trajectory unobstructed.
The time has now come for American men to overthrow their matriarchy at the midterm elections.
When the Americans do it, the rest of the West will follow.
The Culture War is between the good guys and the bad guys. The good guys are the ones who are guided by truth, reason and morality. The bad guys are the ones who defend the status quo of feminism, and feminism is a disease of the mind that will destroy your civilisation.
If you want to continue your race, society, nation and civilisation you need to produce the next generation and parent your offspring properly. Marriage is the rearing of the next generation in optimum conditions. If you don't care about that, you must be one of the following:
1) You have no intention of becoming a married father.
2) You have no prospect of becoming a married father.
What if you would like to become a married father but have no prospect of becoming one?
Then you should want to effect the economic, political and social changes that would make it easier for men in theory capable of becoming married fathers to become married fathers. Currently, the law in the West punishes white heterosexual men while protecting the groups privileged by intersectional feminism.
There are really only two choices: patriarchy or matriarchy.
Patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers, matriarchy that of unmarried mothers.
Which society is more likely to continue in existence for the preservation of your tribe, society, nation and civilisation?
If there were a war between a society that is a patriarchy and a society that is a matriarchy, which would win?
Whether or not you have any prospect of becoming a married father, you are morally obliged to support patriarchy, if you care about truth, logic, morality and the continuation of your tribe, society, nation and civilisation.
If you don't, then you would support the status quo. The status quo is to remain in the EU and to continue with neoliberalism and neoconservatism. Supporters of globalist neoliberalism and neoconservatism would be the ones trying to impeach Trump and to stop the Republicans from winning the midterm elections in November. In Britain they would be the ones working to sabotage Brexit who hate and fear Trump and his supporters.
There are very few rational women. Men know this and let them get away with all kinds of shit because they instinctively excuse them when they fancy them. The brains of men fall out of their skulls when they see a woman they fancy, but in a corrupt and degenerate matriarchy, the woman they fancy is invariably immoral, promiscuous and neurotic. When men collectively allow immoral and neurotic women to dominate their lives, their civilisation is destroyed.
In America, the corrupt sexually-liberated media is suggesting to its sexually-liberated anti-Trump politicians that the word of a porn actress who went back on her word is to be taken much more seriously than that of their President, because it is the tendency of matriarchies to feel threatened by an alpha male leader.
Dmitry Babich made a great point about Stormy Daniels being made a heroine by corrupt liberal-feminist media.
Liberal media serves no purpose other than to spin a narrative for our stupid and corrupt politicians to pretend to believe, so they vote for more war.
The media no longer even cares what the ordinary voter thinks, but is just there as a way of writing history before it has happened. Future historians will think what they saw on media was the justification for war and the preponderance of the media material will be pro-war.
There were all those anti-war protests in 2003.
Apparently, either 6 to 11 million or 8 to 30 million people participated.
Apparently, at least 6 million Westerners who demonstrated could deduce from the facts alone that war was not a good idea but Western politicians who were supposed to be more informed than us, could not.
Democracy is nothing but a cover for war.
We are Athens, Russia is Sparta, and NATO is the Delian League. Ukraine is the latest Delos.
"Americans are nearly twice as likely as Canadians to say abortion should not be permitted at all. We are three times more likely than the British to say abortion should be illegal in all or most cases."https://t.co/3FWH3OXP3t
Cucks will give up their guns without protest and America is full of cucks now. Leaderless beta males are really just women with penis extensions. In other words, they might as well be cattle being led to the slaughterhouse, hurried along with cattle prods. That is probably why American women are madly signalling for migrant Muslim men to enter America and themselves so they can exterminate the cucked white American men on their behalves.
Who is a cuck?
A man who sees the harm the stinking matriarchy is doing to them, their society, nation and civilisation yet refuses to put two and two together and challenge feminism by discussing my proposal to practice slut-shaming again. These tend to be atheist men who are not fathers of legitimate children who don't care what happens after they are dead. They won't fight back because they don't dare and don't want the inconvenience and risk of a fight. Also, they think what remains of Western civilisation will last till their lifetimes. They think that by the time the shit really hits the fan they will be long gone. If they have any children at all, they are probably illegitimate. If they are not illegitimate, they would be estranged from them having lost contact with them after being divorced by their mother under the rules of no fault divorce and deprived of access to their children. If they are still married and living with their mother, their children are probably such ill-bred disappointments they don't care what happens to them and only expect worse-bred illegitimate grandchildren from their sons and daughters.
Cucks are basically moral nihilists incapable of either leading other men or being loyal followers of any alpha male who takes on the burden of leading them. What alpha male other than Donald Trump would risk his status and privileges by standing up for the beta male victims of feminism who are infamous for their degeneracy, treachery and shiftlessness? Is there anyone to replace him after he has come and gone? Is Trump the dead cat bounce of Western civilisation?
You watched the Cathy Newman/Jordan Peterson interview. What did you think?
Feminine Compassionate Fragile Woman "FCFW":
My body contracted [hand touching heart] and I felt so sad for womanhood [nodding earnestly]. I felt disappointed and I could see how the shadow part of womanhood was acting out, I could see how the collective rage was acting through Cathy Newman and this is what happens is that when that is unowned [she waggles a finger at the camera] it is projected blindly to whatever [her whole body moves dramatically in a waggle] it sticks, and it was already clear that she had an agenda and she already had a projection that she was just looking to stick. She was just looking to have that confirmed, and she was trying so hard and I felt that this was just a classical example of feminine manipulation [nodding sagaciously], of the deep shadow manipulation, control, abuse [waggling her head in a circle]. So I felt on behalf of women, I feel sad and disappointed [nodding sadly and in a disappointed way] because we need to have intelligent conversations [inexplicably making motions of twisting something in her hand] that is aligned with the evolutionary dream, that is aligned with creating a future not destroying but finding those values. Have an intelligent conversation. In that sense I would have loved to see Jordan Peterson become present with that in that moment and say OK, I want a time out from the debate that we are having and I want to explore exactly what's going on right here because I can feel you're coming with a lot of anger and I think it's important that that anger gets acknowledged, but that we become real with what's going on and say "It's a projection, I understand why it's there, I would like us to find a way to move through it. This is what we need as men and women instead of blindly projecting our rage on to whoever man shows up for it."
DF:
You said she came in as a victim but under the surface was abuse?
FCFW:
I felt it was abusive that she was manipulating everything that he was saying. She was manipulating into the image she had in her head and she would just twist [her hands demonstrate a twist in case we didn't get what she meant] what he was saying and she would not listen, so it was not a conversation, it was a power game [she nods emphatically and seriously at this revelation], and she was the abuser. I felt cringey on behalf of women that this is not an empowerment, this is not the empowered feminine, this is the underbelly of feminism, this is when feminism goes wrong. This is not the future. This is not the future to blame and project and to persecute.
DF:
Can you explain a bit more about what you mean when feminism goes wrong?
FCFW:
When feminism goes wrong we allow the collective rage to act out through us. [She makes sweeping stroking motions over her body as if inviting her interviewer to think of stroking her body to calm her down.] So we see every situation, we see every man, we see every encounter with the lens of the victim and we are so angry about it and it's boiling in every woman right under the surface and [snaps her fingers dramatically] so she will quickly snap if there is a reason or an apparent reason because it's so strong it hasn't discharged, it's in the collective and that rage needs to discharge but it needs to discharge in an intelligent way, not in an unconscious way.
DF:
And you said before that that rage is often directed at men not showing up [for dates?]?
FCFW:
I'd say it's two way because yes it's targeted at men not showing up [for dates?] or they are causing but it's very often projected out to men that are trying to show up, that is actually engaging with women and actually talking about these things so that's when we bring up this topic and it's so easy for women to tap into that collective pool of rage and it just comes out.
DF:
And it's also difficult as well because one imagines that combative attitude is something that has served her well in the past and something that maybe she felt forced into because of the nature of the society that she is operating in, so it's a kind of Catch 22 situation for many successful women because they are pushed to be more masculine and then when they are more masculine they get judged for being more masculine.
FCFW:
It's very sad and I can see that dynamics being played out absolutely but the only thing we can do is to take responsibility and say OK, I'm doing that. Do I really want to compromise my femininity? [makes gestures and posture suggesting femininity] Do I really want to compromise my integrity? [makes gestures and posture suggesting integrity with a pained expression] Do I really want to compromise my gender? Is there another way I can be powerful without being aggressive, without playing a power game but resting in my natural power [her eyes dart across the room as if trying to locate her natural power], resting in my natural dignity, resting in that deep-rootedness that we both have in our genders that when we are at peace with it and when we acknowledge it in our selves [very emphatically], it's there as a natural thing. I don't want to make this personal about Cathy Newman because that potential is in every woman but it is because we are persecuting our own femininity. What's being played out there we are doing to ourselves because we don't trust that it's good enough to be a woman. We don't trust that it is good enough to have conversations that come from a felt embodied perspective, we don't trust that we are connected to truth because these masculine ways have been very strong and women have been denying their own power.
DF:
This is not specific to Cathy Newman. The fact that that interview has resonated with so many people, that it's been so popular, shows that something archetypal was going on in that interaction and I think as well why it's gone viral is that a lot of people watching it recognise the dynamics. I've been in conversations like that. I've been in this conversation when nothing I say works, when nothing I say gets through so there's something fundamental about the masculine feminine dynamic going on in there. What do you think that is?
FCFW:
I think Jordan Peterson. he's everyman. Cathy Newman, she's everywoman. I can tap into this rage like this [making a motion of snapping her fingers without snapping them]. I know it in myself and women who say they don't are denying this because it is in the collective. So in that sense it just highlighted what's there. It's wonderful because here we really get to look at why this is so important, [making a gesture that suggests that she is holding a new born infant that she is about to sacrifice to the deity of feminism] why it is so important to really listen to a thinker like Jordan Peterson and take it seriously and say "What can we do with it?" It's just so obvious that it's needed [looking down at the infant she is about to sacrifice on the altar of feminism], because if this is where we are, if this is society, if this is our ability to have an intelligent conversation, we are in trouble.
DF:
In the interview I had with Jordan Peterson he said the animus-possessed woman, which is the woman in our masculine side. the kind of defence for the feminine side sees every man or projects on to every man the patriarchy
Cut to Jordan Peterson spewing psychobabble.
and the way of out that is to see it from a Jungian perspective that the masculine archetype has both sides. The masculine archetype is both the tyrannical senile king and the benevolent father at the same time, and so they are multi-layered and see either side in any man [seems to suggest by his hand gestures that he is holding a transparent ball containing a man who is both a tyrannical senile king and a benevolent father and looking at him from different angles] but the animus-possessed woman sees only one side, and that is patriarchy and that is the tyrannical system, that is something that just needs to be destroyed. Does that make a lot of sense to you?
FCFW:
[As if receiving an expensive gift from him] I feel that that is precisely what's going on, it's a blind projection that makes every man and situation, it makes it into an image, and that image is where all the rage can go, so I would absolutely agree with that, but another thing I want to say is that that rage that is waiting for an outlet also is important information in the sense that it needs to be heard, it needs to be acknowledged and it is also there because women haven't found a way to be in our power which is not necessarily the way of the mind and the way of having an intellectual conversation about something. It's about coming back to the body and about coming back to feeling the energy of what's going on and really trust that we know in our body a deep truth that cannot necessarily be met or acknowledged in an intellectual conversation and because women have not been able to articulate that deep truth, that deep wisdom, that deep power, that's also where the rage comes because we know that deep down there's something that hasn't been seen or acknowledged by men and we're so angry about that and just forget that we have to start with ourselves, and to say "OK, I feel something is going on here. How can we address this is an intelligent way that is not just pure philosophy and not just a pure intellectual conversation, but it's in touch with what's real, it's in touch with life, it's in touch with co-creating illusion, co-creating consciousness and we can't do that only in an intellectual conversation where we are just arguing against each other's shadows [shaking head sadly], it's not real.
DF:
It's a disembodied ideological conflict. That reminds of something I've heard before, that men test ideas and women teste men, and there's some truth in that from what you're saying because women know on a deeper level than men [as if holding his heart and offering it to her] and women know when men are out of alignment on a deeper level than men often do and so there is something about women's embodied way of knowing and a genuine [as if making a grab for her breast with his right hand] ... It's essential for women to test men, so how aligned are you? [his hand darts out again as if to grab her breast] and that is what I think is playing out on the wider culture. The excesses of feminism you could say are men being tested on an epic cultural level to show up, to grow up, to acknowledge our shadows and be present, and that the evolutionary step that we need to see also but then you're saying women also need to acknowledge their shadows as well.
FCFW:
[All the while she is nodding earnestly and rhythmically in response to his words and gestures as if they were two birds conducting an elaborate dance or mating ritual with their words] But I think that was playing up perfectly in the interview in the sense that Cathy she just got more and more angry and the reason why, what was missing out was the masculine being present with her and feeling her [she says the last two words in a husky whisper as if in invitation to DF to feel her] instead of meeting her with the mind because that is only going to feel overpowering if you're in your motions and in your body, instead of being really present and saying "I feel your rage, I understand it" so that's where we can start moving on because the feminine will feel seen, it will feel respected in that embodied truth, because, yes, women have something to be enraged about, for sure, and we need that to become real and not just to become a power battle, so, yes, women test men to call them into presence and embodiment and just an intellectual conversation is not enough, it's going to keep stirring up the rage, so we need to find a way to have that conversation where both the body, the deeper wisdom, the deeper intelligence and the mind is there present on both sides. That's what I mean about having an intelligent conversation. It's not just a conversation of the mind, it's a conversation about what's real, what's aligned with life, and that's a whole different conversation. It's a different way of communicating. [She seems to be saying that Jordan Peterson could have either turned Cathy Newman on to him either by making her want to have sex with him or by agreeing with her to stop her from becoming upset at him by winning the argument.]
DF:
So what Jordan Peterson could have done better in that interview was to have said "I can feel where you're coming from"?
FCFW:
I think that could have changed the whole energy and dynamic and it could have moved it forward, but it's impossible to move it forward when we're both in battle mode and so, yes, I really feel that there is this collective subconscious rage [slowing down and emphasising with hand gestures the last three words and even looking a little angry in case we miss the point] that is just boiling in women and it's coming up in so many ways we see in the media and what's going on is this unknown rage that comes up in many different ways. On the one hand, it needs to come out, we need to clear it, it needs to be expressed, it needs to be acknowledged. On the other hand, it's not enough. This is only breaking the ice so that the next step of evolution can, you know, consciousness can start coming through, and that's what lacking in women. We need to take responsibility for what we do as women in our manipulation, in our seduction, in our control, and it's so easy for women to say "But that's just because we're angry and men did this and patriarchy", but that's such a lack of responsibility, and this women really need to know.
DF:
Because we could say look at me too which has been kind of ongoing for a long time and still a massive force and we can say it's brought up a lot of male shadows, it's shown up a lot of male behaviour that is just inexcusable, should not happen and it certainly started as a positive thing but then there is perhaps a danger of it flipping into a very simplistic narrative of men as only aggressors and women as only victims. Is that something you are worried about?
FCFW:
I am very worried about that because what it feels like is because it has displayed the male shadow, but who talks about the female shadow, the rage that women are expressing blindly and projecting on to whichever situation and whichever man that they can. This is where women need to step up and take responsibility and stop blaming men, it's pointless. We need to transcend this, we can't solve this problem from the same level [makes levelling motions with her hands] and look at how I am adding to this dynamic as a woman because we are, we are co-creating it in perfect harmony. If women are angry, we absolutely need to take responsibility for getting ourselves to another place.
DF:
I mean, that's the kind of shadow work, the acceptance that we all have shadows that men certainly have a shadow, there is a shadow around masculinity, but there's also a shadow around femininity while part of the cultural conversation now is toxic masculinity and everyone knows what you mean by toxic masculinity, if you talk about toxic femininity, everyone still knows what you mean, but you can't have that conversation. It's interesting what's allowed to be said and what's allowed not to be said at the moment and that I think is very dangerous that certain topics, certain conversations are off limits.
FCFW:
And this is where we see the victim persecutor dynamics activated [makes twisting motions with her hand]. Women become the victims, we make ourselves the victims and we persecute men but in that aggression, in that rage and when we are the victims, we are in perfect control [sic]. We become the persecutors because we say ... it's all about blame. [nonsensically] Men did this and men need to take responsibility, but in that we become the persecutors.
DF:
It's also a problem with the media because the short attention span of the media wants to polarise things. It's a very straightforward narrative - victim perpetrator - and yet the true dynamics needs something more than just the short analysis or a soundbite. It needs to be unpacked over time and it's easily taken out of context, which is why it is such a hot potato for the media to handle.
FCFW:
[Nodding vigorously in sympathy] It's also a very old story about you cannot say to a woman in a public debate take responsibility for what you are doing, take responsibility for the role you're playing into and I want to talk for a moment about the Presidents Club. I don't know very much about the details, but I think women in this country when we enter the room we have an absolute right to put up a boundary [her eyes dart around as if looking for this boundary] and the ability to put a boundary and say "I'm not going to play this game, I'm not going to co-create this antagonism between men and women and I'm not going to co-create this patriarchal structure and be a victim if I work in a bar somewhere and someone is groping me, [looking at her own body as if to imagining where she might be groped], I have the responsibility to say "Stop it right now" or to my manage "Have that person kicked out" or walk out of the room. No one needs to be a victim and this is what women just simply don't want to hear. They don't want to take responsibility for we are co-creating it, we like being the victims, we like blaming men instead of doing our own work and say "What am I getting from this whole seduction control manipulation?" I get power - the power of the victim - and it's the easy power, it's the cheap power and it's not long-lasting. We really need to have this conversation in a balanced way.
DF:
Cos I started teaching men's work maybe a year ago or so and the biggest reason for that was that I could see a need for it individually and among a lot of the men I know but because also culturally it felt like a time when men are being challenged to step up to evolve as men, to integrate our shadows and be confronted with negative traits in masculinity and to integrate them and move forward, but some people might look at men's work and say "It's divisive. What you're doing is perpetuating the patriarchy" for example. What do you think of that as a criticism?
FCFW:
It's a really good question because in my experience when I work with men and women, for me it's very obvious that women really relate to self-development and to going deep emotionally in themselves where I feel men are more vague or not as on it and it might be that I am a woman and men want more kind of safe environments where there's only men to do that, but I feel that men have been somehow lacking in really engaging with their own personal development, really taking personal responsibility for their belief patterns, for their emotions for how they show up in the world, and in my work I feel I am going deep in womanhood. What does it mean to be a woman? This is what interests me. This is what I am passionate about. It's about the deep feminine and women are drawn to that, so many women come to me and say "Thank you for showing up in the world like this now" I'm getting a sense of something that hasn't ... I haven't had it modelled. You know, in my therapy practice we talk a lot about childhood and how were your parents and so few women have modelled a healthy feminine, so that's what I'm passionate about, but in that work I feel I have gotten to a point in my life where I am thinking "Where's the men?" I don't know about men [waggling her body dramatically to signify ignorance], I don't know what's going on with men, I don't feel them, I don't feel they are showing up, and I'm talking very general but this is what I feel, it's a lack of willingness to show up with a woman that is present, and this is what I'm missing, this is why I feel men's work is so important because women are trying to do their work and there's a lot to do still - I really want to admit that - but men need to show up and right now there's one man here [pointing to an imaginary man in the room] and there's one man there [pointing to another imaginary man in the room] but most men out there are boys still, and I'm sad to say this but that's what I feel, and most women are girls, so on both sides we have so much work to do.
DF:
I always found men's work really helpful. I've done a lot of self-development work and really found that the men's work was that landing in my masculinity, landing with other men [makes hand gestures indicating he means his sex organs], feeling comfortable in myself around other men healing those wounds then really allowed me to meet women [dramatic big hand gestures suggesting that he was embracing the women he met big time] from a much more grounded place and I found my relationships with women improving with the amount of men's work that I had been doing and so I wanted to start leading men's work and bring that kind of work to other men [and thereby get more pussy] and then my background as a journalist because I have always been interested in following the media and then I saw the same dynamics playing out in the political sphere. The Trump/Hillary election was just so clearly from my perspective that we're so clearly desperate for genuine masculine values and so missing them that somehow some strange caricature and facsimile of genuine masculine values people are voting for and suddenly this guy who's a boy pretending to be a man is the most powerful man in the world so these dynamics are playing out in all of our lives and then on the wider scale. It's quite astonishing to see that. [As you can see, David Fuller is not a Trump supporter.]
FCFW:
I think that was perfectly highlighting the sickness of Postmodernism [the Disease of the Mind that is Feminism?]. We needed to smash the values so Postmodernism is a good thing, but we cannot stay there. We've smashed the values. No one knows what it is to be a man and no one knows what it is to be a woman. And we see these caricatures. We seem someone stepping up and doing something and "Oh let's go that way" because we have lost ground. Men have lost ground, women have lost ground. We're calling for a more empowered feminine that's all in the world and old patriarchy, now we need to call in the deep feminine, but what about the masculine? We seen an absolute caricature of a man being so powerful in the world because it's exactly where we are. If we don't change, this is what we get so it's a very very healthy lesson for the world to see if we don't start changing this is our future, we've arrived to our future. What are we going to do about that? [The more feminazi the feminazis get, the Trumpier Trump and his supporters will become.]
DF:
And also I think it is important to say that what I'm talking about and tell me if you think this is what you're talking about as well about going back to the old masculine feminine dynamics. It's not saying men have to be stereotypically masculine, women have to be stereotypically feminine. It's going through this kind of gender neutral space and re-embracing the sort of our masculine and feminine essence and playing those roles out more consciously. For me, it's like an evolutionary step.
FCFW:
I absolutely agree. We need to go through this, we need to pull everything apart, but we need to put it together again and say we never have the truth. Where is the truth? The truth is always changing. We are in a stream of evolution. We never arrive at that place, but we need to keep questioning and we need to put together those pieces that create solid ground for us that creates these [making snakelike movements] maps, so that we know where to go, so we have role models, we have people, we have values that we resonate with so we are not just lost, and we see that - I'm from Scandinavia. Scandinavia is one of the places in the world where we have the highest amount of gender equality, but what also happens is that we see a somehow gender neutral space where men and women are the same and it's so important to move through that, but especially ...
DF:
[interjecting inexplicably] Great friends and bad sex!
FCFW:
[equally inexplicably] Yes, exactly! Men are completely losing their identity and losing their power and losing the essence of their masculinity and women are somehow taking that over and getting bitter and resentful about it, so at the surface it looks like a really equal society but in terms of relationships [makes shimmying motions with her shoulders] and in terms of polarity, it's not working very well.
Just as Muslims have done nasty things to each other, Christians have done nasty things to each other too. After all, the Americans fled from the Old World to the New World to escape Christian on Christian religious persecution, for which Christians are infamous. https://t.co/QZAVcA8mMw
Your police and court system are already overwhelmed by the crimes of indigenous criminals. Do we really want to overload it more by importing foreign criminals? What purpose would this serve? https://t.co/itjBwcf0No
Stop all the clocks, cut off the telephone, Prevent the dog from barking with a juicy bone, Silence the pianos and with muffled drum Bring out the coffin, let the mourners come. Let aeroplanes circle moaning overhead Scribbling on the sky the message He Is Dead, Put crepe bows round the white necks of the public doves, Let the traffic policemen wear black cotton gloves. He was my North, my South, my East and West, My working week and my Sunday rest, My noon, my midnight, my talk, my song; I thought that love would last for ever: I was wrong. The stars are not wanted now: put out every one; Pack up the moon and dismantle the sun; Pour away the ocean and sweep up the wood. For nothing now can ever come to any good.
How do you fight such a thing except question the very political system that allows the US Military Industrial Complex to run all Western governments - democracy itself?
The only countries in the world that still have an independent foreign policy is China, Russia and Iran.
How much do you think the average voter cares about foreign policy?
How much do you think the average female voter (to whom all political parties pander) care about foreign policy?
We know what happened to Athens as a result of its compulsive warmongering, do we not?
We must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military–industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals so that security and liberty may prosper together.
When u find it hard to reason in the abstract u look 4 Muslim immigrants you see/hate rather than Western foreign policy u don't understand. https://t.co/GmpGQEzIxh
Allowing Muslim immigration causes Muslims to be hated, creating the desire to bomb and invade Muslim countries. Brilliant, really. https://t.co/Cyhy8i2rbo
We should ask, and seek a satisfactory answer to the question: Was it a coincidence that the British government capitulated to women at precisely the same moment in history that it directed a blood feud of a savagery unknown for centuries? Extraordinary lengths were taken to prevail in the First World War, and extraordinary measures were taken rather than accede to the German and American peace overtures which were made, especially during December 1916.
It is generally acknowledged that the First World War directly led to the Second.
A man who has lost control at home can seek to dominate elsewhere.
The desire to dominate and subdue women, a natural male instinct with sound evolutionary origins, was expressed another way. Germany was subjugated instead. Moreover the British government had itself become feminized, choosing as its adversary one more masculine than itself, the sort of enemy the female would choose. By attacking a more masculine opponent, males were serving the female interest.
A nation, like a man, that is secure in itself and in its masculine capacity to control does not wish to cruelly persecute a vanquished foe. This took place after both world wars.
... feminization played a part in the instigation and unprecedented magnitude of violence of the subsequent two world wars. One cannot help but wonder at the carnage and suffering which might have been avoided had British bobbies, on facing organized suffragette rebellion in the years around 1910, simply been told to “roll up their sleeves.”
9/11 was used by the US government to launch wars that have destroyed in whole or part seven countries, killing millions of peoples and producing millions of refugees. 9/11 was also used to create an American police state, which is a far greater threat to freedom and democracy than Muslim terrorism.
my condolences to you and the United Kingdom at this shocking time
They were bound to get round to us sooner or later. Interesting, isn't it, that neocon policies just carry on no matter which President is in power, no matter what the presidential candidate says about ending war? It is like US foreign policy is nothing to do with POTUS. Trump is just not saying anything about foreign policy like he is not saying anything about the weather in Timbuktu, because it is nothing to do with him. What a farce of a political system democracy is. No one's in charge, everyone's doing their own thing, no one has any idea where the buck has now been passed to, until it goes bang ...
The deep state probably threatened to murder Trump and his entire family if he didn't toe the neocon line.
What is the point of a "democracy" like this?
"Democracy" just means public ignorance and indifference to Western foreign policy and hatred of Muslims and immigrants while refusing to challenge feminism.
The vassal states of Neocon America say #WeStandTogether on warmongering neocon NATO invasions of Muslim countries that provoke terrorism. https://t.co/AqJi7PrFFz
No discussion of the neocon US foreign policy carried out by NATO vassal states that provokes Muslim terrorism. I wonder why! #r4todayhttps://t.co/llExPb2VSX
Alex Jones to Trump: "They're going to destroy your family if you don't win this one."
Took the words right out of my mouth.
"This is total war. They're going for Baron, Eric and Donald Junior, even after you're gone. You must go on the offence."
I have been saying that for the past week to anyone who would listen, and feel easier now that Trump must have heard from Alex Jones himself and appears to be acting on it. No more being a sitting duck.
"Bannon is behind Trump going on the offensive."
"Not only will Trump have to go on the offensive, he will have to appeal to everyone in the world of good will."
Remove a woman’s right to vote and within just one national election, every single leftist party would be crushed. Within two elections, politicians would speak directly to men and their innate interest for patriarchy, economic success, stable families, and an equitable distribution of females among society. More than half of the candidates running for office would already be more conservative than Donald Trump, who is still liberal on social issues like equality and gay marriage.
"Remove a woman’s right to vote and within just one national election, every single leftist party would be crushed" https://t.co/hSfW9ALj05
It takes time to sink in, a bit like being suddenly abandoned by
your spouse, perhaps. The shock and shame of it is so intense you don't
quite know how to announce it to the people who really do need to know,
like the children, your parents or your neighbours.
I can imagine the top brass at the BBC bending
their minds this weekend trying to present this latest development in the best
possible anti-Trump light.
But
the BBC is a dead man walking, having been delegitimised in a single
stroke in the way samurai warriors were known to be able to cut a man in
half with a single stroke of the sword.
There's been plenty of action to keep Jonny Dymond busy as he continues to chart President Trump's First Hundred Days.
Jonny Dymond begins to sneer at the American people and their President:
It's not [Trump's voice] chaos, it's like a [Trump's voice] fined-tuned machine. The White House, that is, and is if to prove it, a whole week went by without any hideous cock-ups, resignations or grotesque embarrassments. Well, almost.
[Stupid whooshing sound]
The big policy announcement of the week was a shift in the way illegal immigrants would be rounded up and thrown out of the country. Press Secretary Sean Spicer explained that "The President wanted to take the shackles off individuals in these agencies and say 'You have laws that need to be followed. You should do your mission and follow the law' " so they could put more shackles on illegal immigrants and get them out out of the country more quickly. This is a big deal to a lot of Americans and was as has happened in previous weeks the President was keeping a campaign promise.
[Stupid whooshing sound]
[Trump's voice:] "Quiet, quiet, quiet." Got the message? Shut up! President Trump insisted he wasn't anti-Semitic to a journalist who had gone out of his way to say he wasn't accusing him of being anti-Semitic. "I haven't seen anyone in my community accuse either yourself or anyone on your staff of being anti-Semitic."
After a fourth wave of bomb threats to Jewish community centres and the desecration of a Jewish cemetery in St Louis, the President found the words he had apparently mislaid for so long.
[Trump's voice:] "The anti-Semitic threats targeting our Jewish community and community centres are horrible."
[Stupid whooshing sound]
"He is a man of tremendous talent and tremendous experience." Lt Gen H R McMaster will replace [Trump's voice] the wonderful man that the President had to sack as his National Security Adviser because he was a liar. Lt Gen McMaster's appointment was widely praised.
[Stupid whooshing sound followed by a thud]
It used to be that Americans asked in whiny way "Who do I call when I want to speak to Europe?" Now, Europeans kind of scratch their heads and wonder "Who do I listen to when I want to hear US foreign policy?"[RT of course. https://www.rt.com/shows/crosstalk/]
[Trump's voice:] "He said he was going to ask a simple easy question, and it's not. It's not a fair question"
because a nice man - a kindly sounding man called Mike Pence said:
"The United States of America strongly supports NATO and will be unwavering in our commitment to this Transatlantic alliance"
whereas the President President has described NATO as obsolete and suggests that maybe the US won't bother turning up if the Russians take over one of the smaller members if it doesn't pay its dues. Let's hope it's Mike at the helm when the tanks roll, eh?
Finally, remember the voters? The President does, all the time. He went to Florida, much of which he owns to hold a rally with supporters one of whom he liked so much the President got him to do the talking.
[Gene Huber's voice:] "When President Trump during the election promised all these things that he was going to do for us, I knew he was going to do this for us!"
You may sneer at the President's garbled rhetoric, but his supporters get it.
It was all going rather well for Mr Trump until he decided to continue with his habit of insulting allies for no reason at all.
[Trump's voice:] "You look at what's happening last night in Sweden ... "
Sweden?
[Trump's voice:] "Sweden!"
Really?
[Trump's voice:] "Who would believe this?"
Nobody?
[Trump's voice:] Sweden!
Mr Trump, nothing happened in Sweden last night, or the night before, or the year before. It's Sweden, where nothing ever happens, but hey, why let the facts get in the way of a great presidency, and this, folks, have no doubt, is going to be a great presidency, tremendous, even."
Jonny Dymond will continue to sneer at the American people and their President next Friday.
This Jonny Dymond report was on 24 February. Time enough to have corrected this perception that nothing ever happens in Sweden, surely? But Jonny Dymond has his head so far up his own libtard arse he hasn't noticed, and strangely, nor do the other libtards at The World At One.
You would have thought Shaun Ley who was presenting the World At One would have noticed, being in the business of news, but nope.
Shaun Ley. As Trump would put it, "another beauty".
