Translate

Showing posts with label Frank Field. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Frank Field. Show all posts

Saturday, 1 August 2020

The purpose of religion

The purpose of religion is to unite a people who have shared values that is beyond one's skin colour. That is why Jews come in four colours. The people who are always complaining about Jews are atheists, ex-Christians or pagans who also Islamophobes as well as antisemites. The reason they have fallen behind Jews is because they have no religion and their current substitute for religion now is hatred of Jews, Muslims, non-whites and of course their government who now have members coming from these minorities.

Low education and low status people tend to hate everyone above them. If these people knew their Bible, they would know that envy is considered a Deadly Sin. Their hatred of those who do better than they do is provoked by the indifference of their own political classes and the idea that Jews, Muslims and non-whites are doing better than they are in their own white majority country. In particular, they believe that they have in some way cheated and subverted the religion of their ancestors and their political system.

But if Christianity and democracy were so easy to subvert by a few minorities, then it is time to conclude that they have failed, whatever the reasons for their failure. If Christianity is your antivirus and your computer is infected, then your antivirus has failed.

The obvious solution when suffering from the double-whammy of a failed religion and failed political system would be a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism. After ten years, these antisemites and Islamophobes have not thought of a better solution other than pogrom.

But you have to be in government first before you can conduct a pogrom.

They are about as likely to form a government as the Dalits are to be voted into office in India which operates a caste system. Dalits are of course bottom of the heap, with four castes above them.

The only viable option is to have a one party state capable of governing in the national interest and making the working classes work again, without losing office because of a general strike.

What is needed is a government of national unity which is a euphemism for a one party state. This is not really as heretical as it sounds, since there are three MPs to my knowledge who have proposed this solution: Frank Field, Nicky Morgan and Anna Soubry.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/dec/08/government-debt-gilt-sales
https://www.politicshome.com/news/article/top-tory-mp-mulls-government-of-national-unity-as-theresa-may-scrambles-to-change-brexit-deal
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jul/18/anna-soubry-attacks-tory-whips-threats-over-brexit-votes

Friday, 31 August 2018

40 questions for Frank Field


  1. Would you prefer to go out with a bang or a whimper? If the former, by resigning the Labour whip, are you preparing to go out with a bang?
  2. What do you plan to do when you retire?
  3. When you say National Government, do you mean a one party state?
  4. Have you read The China Model by Daniel Bell? https://press.princeton.edu/titles/10418.html
  5. Have you read How Democracy Ends by David Runciman? https://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/books/how-democracy-ends-by-david-runciman-review-a3842021.html
  6. Do you think Britain would be better off as a one party state rather than as an oligarchy?
  7. If Britain became a one party state, would it be better if it was a de facto one party state or a de jure one party state?
  8. What was your view of Peter Bone MP's House of Commons Disqualification Bill? https://www.conservativehome.com/parliament/2010/10/peter-bone-seeks-to-abolish-the-flatterers-cajolers-and-sometime-bullies-that-are-the-party-whips.html
  9. Would you agree that if Peter Bone's House of Commons Disqualification Bill had become law and party whips disqualified from being a member of the House the logic of that would have moved Britain towards a one party state?
  10. Would you agree that the operation of our oligarchy is corrupt?
  11. If Britain were a one party state, would longstanding social problems eg state education, family breakdown etc be more likely to be solved?
  12. Would you agree that Tory and Labour are the two main and unprincipled tribes of Britain who represent nothing more than class interests?
  13. Would you agree that any one party state that is established should have as its core principle that of promoting the national interest and giving its members the right to debate what is or is not in the national interest without being penalised by the party?
  14. Do you often wonder if you have joined the wrong party, bearing in mind that your parents were Conservatives?
  15. Which Labour politician do you admire the most?
  16. Which Tory politician do you admire the most?
  17. What is your proudest political achievement?
  18. What regrets and errors are you prepared to admit to?
  19. Is it right that gentiles in their own country where they are the overwhelming majority are being constantly bullied by vocal minorities with accusations of antisemitism, Islamophobia and racism? 
  20. Which Acts of Parliament would you repeal if you could?
  21. What legislation would you pass if you could?
  22. Are there more Acts of Parliament you would repeal than there is legislation you would pass? 
  23. Do the British people need a religion?
  24. Is Christianity kaput?
  25. Do you really believe that Christ is also the co-equal of the Abrahamic God?
  26. Have you ever found the Trinity hard to believe?
  27. Is Christianity idolatrous?
  28. Are you prepared to admit that Christianity is idolatrous?
  29. Have you read the Koran?
  30. What are your views on neoconservatism?
  31. What are your views on neoliberalism?
  32. Would you agree with the view that Labour only represents unionised members of the working classes - known as the aristocracy of labour - and ignores the rest? 
  33. Do you agree that it is the job of the government to make the working classes work?
  34. Are political parties reluctant to correct the behaviour of voters because they fear to lose votes and elections?
  35. Should the government be afraid to correct the behaviour of those it governs?
  36. Does the behaviour of Labour supporters require correction? If so, in what way?
  37. Does the behaviour of Tory supporters require correction? If so, in what way?  
  38. If you were required to replace liberal democracy with another political system, what would you replace it with?
  39. If you were required to replace Christianity with another religion, what would you replace it with?
  40. What was the worst error a British government ever made?

Wednesday, 20 May 2015

The way forward for Labour: merge with the Conservative Party


Frank Field agrees was the one who gave me this idea at
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/dec/08/government-debt-gilt-sales

A national government is really a polite term for a one-party state, and a proper de jure one-party state would allow party members to work together better.

If we are to have a one-party state then party members' rights must be protected and the best way of protecting the rights of members is to remove the office of the whip as Peter Bone proposed at http://s477308942.websitehome.co.uk//parliament/2010/10/peter-bone-seeks-to-abolish-the-flatterers-cajolers-and-sometime-bullies-that-are-the-party-whips.html

If we are to have a one-party state then the party's administrative decisions should be subject to judicial review as a public body. The Indian courts have already affirmed this principle.

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-in-a-landmark-ruling-central-information-commission-puts-political-parties-under-the-rti-act-1843197

How we can have a one-party state that would protect the rights of its members: by subjecting its administrative decisions to judicial review as a public body

Saturday, 23 March 2013

33 MPs I would like to nominate Frank Field to replace Ed Milband




EUROSCEPTIC LABOUR MPs
  1. Ronnie Campbell (Blyth Valley)
  2. Rosie Cooper (Lancashire West)
  3. Jeremy Corbyn (Islington North)
  4. Jon Cruddas (Dagenham & Rainham)
  5. John Cryer (Leyton & Wanstead)
  6. Ian Davidson (Glasgow South West)
  7. Natascha Engel (Derbyshire North East)
  8. Frank Field (Birkenhead)
  9. Roger Godsiff (Birmingham Hall Green)
  10. Kate Hoey (Vauxhall)
  11. Kelvin Hopkins (Luton North)
  12. Steve McCabe (Birmingham Selly Oak)
  13. John McDonnell (Hayes & Harlington)
  14. Austin Mitchell (Great Grimsby)
  15. Dennis Skinner (Bolsover)
  16. Andrew Smith (Oxford East)
  17. Graham Stringer (Blackley & Broughton)
  18. Gisela Stuart (Birmingham Edgbaston)
  19. Mike Wood (Batley & Spen).



AGAINST LIBYA  INTERVENTION

  1. Graham Allen (Lab)
  2. Ronnie Campbell (Lab) (also Eurosceptic)
  3. Katy Clark (Lab)
  4. Jeremy Corbyn (Lab) (also Eurosceptic)
  5. Barry Gardiner (Lab)
  6. Roger Godsiff (Lab) (also Eurosceptic)
  7. John McDonnell (Lab) (also Eurosceptic)
  8. Yasmin Qureshi (Lab)
  9. Linda Riordan (Lab)
  10. Dennis Skinner (Lab) also Eurosceptic
  11. Mike Wood (Lab) also Eurosceptic


AGAINST IRAQ WAR


  1. Ms Diane Abbott (Hackney North & Stoke Newington) 
  2. Graham Allen (Nottingham North) (also Eurosceptic and against intervention in Libya)
  3. John Austin (Erith & Thamesmead) 
  4. Tony Banks (West Ham) 
  5. Harry Barnes (Derbyshire North East) 
  6. John Battle (Leeds West) 
  7. Andrew Bennett (Denton & Reddish) 
  8. Joe Benton (Bootle) (also against gay marriage)
  9. Dr Roger Berry (Kingswood) 
  10. Harold Best (Leeds North West) 
  11. Bob Blizzard (Waveney) 
  12. Keith Bradley (Manchester Withington) 
  13. Kevin Brennan (Cardiff West) 
  14. Ms Karen Buck (Regent's Park & Kensington North) 
  15. Richard Burden (Birmingham Northfield) 
  16. Ms Anne Campbell (Cambridge) 
  17. Ronnie Campbell (Blyth Valley) 
  18. Martin Caton (Gower) 
  19. David Chaytor (Bury North) 
  20. Michael Clapham (Barnsley West & Penistone) 
  21. Mrs Helen Clark (Peterborough) 
  22. Tom Clarke (Coatbridge & Chryston) 
  23. Tony Clarke (Northampton South) 
  24. Harry Cohen (Leyton & Wanstead) 2
  25. Iain Coleman (Hammersmith & Fulham) 
  26. Michael Connarty (Falkirk East) 
  27. Frank Cook (Stockton North) 
  28. Robin Cook (Livingston) 
  29. Jeremy Corbyn (Islington North) (also Eurosceptic and against intervention in Libya)
  30. Jim Cousins (Newcastle upon Tyne Central) 
  31. Tom Cox (Tooting) 
  32. David Crausby (Bolton North East) 
  33. Ms Ann Cryer (Keighley) 
  34. John Cryer (Hornchurch) 
  35. Tam Dalyell (Linlithgow) 
  36. Ms Valerie Davey (Bristol West) 
  37. Ian Davidson (Glasgow Pollok) 
  38. Denzil Davies (Llanelli) 
  39. Terry Davis (Birmingham Hodge Hill) 
  40. Hilton Dawson (Lancaster & Wyre) 
  41. John Denham (Southampton Itchen) 
  42. Parmjit Dhanda (Gloucester) 
  43. Jim Dobbin (Heywood & Middleton) (also against gay marriage)
  44. Frank Dobson (Holborn & St Pancras) 
  45. Frank Doran (Aberdeen Central) 
  46. David Drew (Stroud) 
  47. Huw Edwards (Monmouth) 
  48. Clive Efford (Eltham) 
  49. Bill Etherington (Sunderland North) 
  50. Mark Fisher (Stoke-on-Trent Central) 
  51. Paul Flynn (Newport West) 
  52. Hywel Francis (Aberavon) 
  53. George Galloway (Glasgow Kelvin) 
  54. Neil Gerrard (Walthamstow) 
  55. Dr Ian Gibson (Norwich North) 
  56. Roger Godsiff (Birmingham Sparkbrook & Small Heath) (also Eurosceptic and against intervention in Libya)
  57. Win Griffiths (Bridgend) 
  58. John Grogan (Selby) 
  59. Patrick Hall (Bedford) 
  60. David Hamilton (Midlothian) 
  61. Fabian Hamilton (Leeds North East) 
  62. Dai Havard (Merthyr Tydfil & Rhymney) 
  63. Doug Henderson (Newcastle upon Tyne North) 
  64. Stephen Hepburn (Jarrow) 
  65. David Heyes (Ashton under Lyne) 
  66. David Hinchliffe (Wakefield) 
  67. Ms Kate Hoey (Vauxhall) 
  68. Jimmy Hood (Clydesdale) 
  69. Kelvin Hopkins (Luton North) 
  70. Ms Joan Humble (Blackpool North & Fleetwood) 
  71. Dr Brian Iddon (Bolton South East) 
  72. Eric Illsley (Barnsley Central) 
  73. Ms Glenda Jackson (Hampstead & Highgate) 
  74. Ms Helen Jackson (Sheffield Hillsborough) 
  75. Jon Owen Jones (Cardiff Central) 
  76. Dr Lynne Jones (Birmingham Selly Oak) 
  77. Martyn Jones (Clwyd South) 
  78. David Kidney (Stafford) 
  79. Peter Kilfoyle (Liverpool Walton) 
  80. Mark Lazarowicz (Edinburgh North & Leith) 
  81. David Lepper (Brighton Pavilion) 
  82. Terry Lewis (Worsley) 
  83. Ian Lucas (Wrexham) 
  84. Iain Luke (Dundee East) 
  85. John Lyons (Strathkelvin & Bearsden) 
  86. Mrs Christine McCafferty (Calder Valley) 
  87. John McDonnell (Hayes & Harlington) (also Eurosceptic and against intervention in Libya)
  88. Ms Ann McKechin (Glasgow Maryhill) 
  89. Kevin McNamara (Hull North) 
  90. Tony McWalter (Hemel Hempstead) 
  91. Ms Alice Mahon (Halifax) 
  92. Jim Marshall (Leicester South) 
  93. Robert Marshall-Andrews (Medway) 
  94. Eric Martlew (Carlisle) 
  95. Ms Julie Morgan (Cardiff North) 
  96. Chris Mullin (Sunderland South) 
  97. Denis Murphy (Wansbeck) 
  98. Doug Naysmith (Bristol North West) 
  99. Eddie O'Hara (Knowsley South) 
  100. Ms Diana Organ (Forest of Dean) 
  101. Albert Owen (Ynys Mon) 
  102. Ms Linda Perham (Ilford North) 
  103. Peter Pike (Burnley) 
  104. Kerry Pollard (St Albans) 
  105. Gordon Prentice (Pendle) 
  106. Gwyn Prosser (Dover) 
  107. Ken Purchase (Wolverhampton North East) 
  108. John Robertson (Glasgow Anniesland) 
  109. Joan Ruddock (Lewisham Deptford) 
  110. Martin Salter (Reading West) 
  111. Mohammad Sarwar (Glasgow Govan) 
  112. Malcolm Savidge (Aberdeen North) 
  113. Philip Sawford (Kettering) 
  114. Brian Sedgemore (Hackney South & Shoreditch) 
  115. Ms Debra Shipley (Stourbridge) 
  116. Alan Simpson (Nottingham South) 
  117. Marsha Singh (Bradford West) 
  118. Chris Smith (Islington South & Finsbury) 
  119. Llew Smith (Blaenau Gwent) 
  120. George Stevenson (Stoke-on-Trent South) 
  121. Dr Gavin Strang (Edinburgh East & Musselburgh) 
  122. Graham Stringer (Manchester Blackley) 
  123. David Taylor (Leicestershire North West) 
  124. Jon Trickett (Hemsworth) 
  125. Paul Truswell (Pudsey) 
  126. Dr Desmond Turner (Brighton Kemptown) 
  127. Bill Tynan (Hamilton South) 
  128. Rudi Vis (Finchley & Golders Green) 
  129. Ms Joan Walley (Stoke-on-Trent North) 
  130. Robert Wareing (Liverpool West Derby) 
  131. Dr Alan Whitehead (Southampton Test) 
  132. Alan Williams (Swansea West) 
  133. Mrs Betty Williams (Conwy) 
  134. Mike Wood (Batley & Spen) (also Eurosceptic and against intervention in Libya)
  135. Tony Worthington (Clydebank & Milngavie) 
  136. David Wright (Telford) 
  137. Dr Tony Wright (Cannock Chase) 
  138. Derek Wyatt (Sittingbourne & Sheppey) 
LABOUR PARTY MPs AGAINST GAY MARRIAGE



  1. Joe Bentonn (also against Iraq War)
  2. Sir Tony Cunningham
  3. Jim Dobbin (also against Iraq War)
  4. Brian Donohoe
  5. Robert Flello
  6. Mary Glindon
  7. Roger Godsiff (also a Eurosceptic, against Libya intervention and Iraq War)
  8. Rt Hon Paul Goggins
  9. Michael McCann
  10. Jim McGovern
  11. Rt Hon Paul Murphy
  12. Stephen Pound
  13. Jim Sheridan



Anyone Labour MP who is on any of these three lists must be good eggs really.  The ones whose names are featured in all three are particularly good eggs.

Where is Tom Harris MP?  He is on none of them!

Frank Field should be leader because he has the respect of senior and principled politicians in the Conservative Party to better work with them in a National Government.

Michael White said:

But I am sure Peter Mandelson would be delighted to be Frank Field's right-hand man as well as his hatchet man.   Ask him and see if I am wrong!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2009/jan/22/frank-field-mandelson-clarke-cable  I just know Frank Field would support this idea because it was him who was going on about a National Government way back in 2009.

Now please get on with it, Frank and Mandy!   Once both of you say you are solid on this, you can have your leadership election (which will really be the Coronation of Frank Field).

It has to be so because you have to show the world that you are now mending your ways, so it cannot be any of the Old Guard Liberals (or The Young Ones, as I would call them).

The Young |Ones: Blair, Brown, and the Milibands


Mandy, it is now time to stop spouting your usual Europhiliac propaganda and smell the coffee.  From now on, it's going to be every European nation for itself.

Do a deal with Frank.  Make a joint statement that that is how you see the future and wait for the thing to snowball.

34 POSSIBLE NOMINATIONS FOR FRANK FIELD TO BECOME LEADER OF LABOUR PARTY FROM THE LIST BELOW


  1. Ronnie Campbell (Blyth Valley)
  2. Rosie Cooper (Lancashire West)
  3. Jeremy Corbyn (Islington North)
  4. Jon Cruddas (Dagenham & Rainham)
  5. John Cryer (Leyton & Wanstead)
  6. Ian Davidson (Glasgow South West)
  7. Natascha Engel (Derbyshire North East)
  8. Roger Godsiff (Birmingham Hall Green)
  9. Kate Hoey (Vauxhall)
  10. Kelvin Hopkins (Luton North)
  11. Steve McCabe (Birmingham Selly Oak)
  12. John McDonnell (Hayes & Harlington)
  13. Austin Mitchell (Great Grimsby)
  14. Dennis Skinner (Bolsover) - Remember me, Austin?  We have met.  
  15. Andrew Smith (Oxford East)
  16. Graham Stringer (Blackley & Broughton)
  17. Gisela Stuart (Birmingham Edgbaston)
  18. Mike Wood (Batley & Spen).
  19. Graham Allen (Lab)
  20. Katy Clark (Lab)
  21. Barry Gardiner (Lab)
  22. Yasmin Qureshi (Lab)
  23. Linda Riordan (Lab)
  24. Ms Diane Abbott (Hackney North & Stoke Newington) - How I wanted Diane to be leader of Labour Party!  I was a member then and even voted for her.   
  25. Kelvin Hopkins (Luton North) 
  26. John Austin (Erith & Thamesmead) 
  27. Ms Joan Humble (Blackpool North & Fleetwood) 
  28. Tony Banks (West Ham) 
  29. Dr Tony Wright (Cannock Chase) 
  30. Dr Brian Iddon (Bolton South East) 
  31. Eric Illsley (Barnsley Central) 
  32. Ms Glenda Jackson (Hampstead & Highgate) - I just wanted Glenda on this list cos I loved her in Elizabeth R!  
  33. Harry Barnes (Derbyshire North East) 
  34. David Wright (Telford) 



Proposed .leader of Labour Party:
Frank Field

Peter Mandelson:
Right Hand Man and Hatchet Man
of  Leader of Labour Party

Thursday, 6 October 2011

National Socialism = One-Party State = National Government

It is possible to argue that National Socialism just means a one-party state which is a ruder way of saying National Governmnt (which Britain had during WW2). Frank Field proposed this as recently as 2008 in The Guardian.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/dec/08/government-debt-gilt-sales

In my view Nazism can be clearly distinguished from National Socialism.

National Socialism, an ideology of nationalism with a stated concern of the working classes, is generic.

Nazism - the failed anti-semitic German version - is nation-specific.

Libya was National Socialist, and so was the Soviet Union. China remains National Socialist.

Singapore however is only a de facto one-party state because although in practice a one-party state, it actually allows other parties to exist, a bit like the UK, which is a bunch of parties with different names but with policies indistinguishable from each other.  (De facto means in practice though not in law.)

I am arguing that a de jure one-party state would be better. (De jure means in law.)

This does not mean no more elections, it just means NO MORE WHIPPING. It means that Peter Bone MP's House of Commons (Disqualification) Bill would in effect have come into force, because every vote would be a FREE VOTE.

http://conservativehome.blogs.com/parliament/2010/10/peter-bone-seeks-to-abolish-the-flatterers-cajolers-and-sometime-bullies-that-are-the-party-whips.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/democracylive/hi/house_of_commons/newsid_9096000/9096136.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/democracylive/hi/house_of_commons/newsid_9584000/9584782.stm
This means that MPs can vote according to their consciences, convictions and principles, where found.

The rights of members of this Only Party would be fiercely and rigorously protected. This means their right to free speech would actually exist, unlike now, when to criticise the leader of their party would mean demotion or expulsion.

Is anyone still with me so far?

I am saying that National Socialism does not have to be racist, anti-semitic or xenophobic or aggressive to its neighbours. It is basically whatever you have successfully argued is in the National Interest and get to the majority of the members of this only party to vote for.

Remember, it was through this mechanism that allowed China to dump Communism and embrace Capitalism, without a counter-revolution. It can be done and has been done.

I propose that we dump Nanny Statism and embrace Libertarianism by means of National Socialism, because fewer laws and lower taxes, ie a Smaller State, would be in the National Interest.  

I also propose that only those who pay a minimum of tax get to vote, to immediately disenfranchise the Slut Single Mums and their useless welfare scrounging probably criminal bastards.

This has already been proposed by Ian Cowie of the Telegraph.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ianmcowie/100010127/a-tax-based-alternative-to-the-alternative-vote/

Friday, 3 December 2010

Frank Field MP suggests GCSE in parenting to help "disadvantaged children" AKA singly mothered little bastards

Frank Field is still not addressing the problem of poverty. We actually want to stop parasites who are the spawn of slut and slapper single mums from breeding while encouraging those who are productive to breed. To do this, we abolish child benefit for all, which is really very simple. We also cut taxes and go cold turkey to kick our national addiction to welfare. Somehow liberals either cannot or refuse to get it.

Children should be taught parenting and life skills throughout their school years? What about not getting knocked up before you have been married? That would be easier to understand, wouldn't it?

One of the drivers in a child's future is its scummy benefit-scrounging unmarried single mother who got knocked up before she even left school.

Why are male politicians afraid of criticising these parasites? Is it because they have given them the vote and that they have all been ideologically castrated? Looks like it. The scandal is that Howard Flight was sacked. That is the *real* scandal. Frank Field would mumble on dully about how to help the poor, stupid, feckless and promiscuous, but the Tories should be talking about abolishing child benefit for all. But because he is an Etonian, most dumbed-down Britons think Cameron cannot possibly be a Pinko Commie.

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck ...

Saturday, 27 November 2010

John Major is slowly coming round to the idea of a one-party state. Frank Field has already. It is called a National Government.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1333561/John-Major-believes-Coalition-run-past-2015-poll.html?ITO=1490

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2009/jan/22/frank-field-mandelson-clarke-cable

http://www.1party4all.co.uk/Home/Account/TopicForm.aspx?topicsId=107
has a draft constitution for the incipient one-party state that should be the logical conclusion of these ideas.

It is tiresome how easily frightened so many British politicians are by these ideas.  Those who are frightened are reminded that Ancient Athens and Republican Rome from which the West draws its democratic traditions were in fact one-party states with shifting factions.  A party is administratively necessary to attract members, field candidates, change rules, count votes etc. 

It will not result in a totalitarian dictatorship if its constitution protects the rights of its members (the most important of which is free speech) against the leader and his cronies. 

China will show us the way.  Whatever you think of its human rights records, the average Chinese Communist Party member has more rights against his party than the average MP against his.  Check out their Article 4. 

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2007-10/25/content_6944738_1.htm

Also note that the Chinese Communist Party periodically revises its constitution to reflect changes in reality. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_People%27s_Republic_of_China

Can we have a sensible discussion about this, please?

Monday, 7 June 2010

Britain takes another step closer to becoming a one-party state

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/politics/10241630.stm

First we had Gordon's GOATS.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brown-completes-government-of-all-talents-with-team-of-outsiders-455341.html

Now we have a Labour MP working with the ConDem Coalition.

Only a matter of time before we become a de jure as well as a de facto one-party state.

I just want it on record that I am offering to help draft the constitution to this unique party of National Interest.

Sunday, 18 October 2009

Frank Field - Prince of Principles

The justice of a roulette wheel

I am delighted that Frank Field has seen fit to protest against this blatant infringement against the rules of natural justice.

Laws should not be retrospective.

One should not be led to think it is OK to do something, do it in good faith, and then be told later that it turns out that people are very upset, have it in for us and want to punish us out out of sheer vindictiveness and that our leaders will see to it that we are punished rather than take the hit themselves.

After all it was the three party leaders who prevented MPs from voting for a payrise and fobbed them off with generous expense claims in lieu.

Why no MP has pointed this out I do not know. Perhaps it would "send out the wrong message" and demonstrate that not only are MPs useless at looking after the national interest, they are also hopless at looking after even their own best interests. Not only are they cowardly, dishonest and greedy, they are also stupid.

I pride myself on my longstanding support for causes, individuals and groups who have been misunderstood and traduced.

In my time I have stood up for the BNP, Peter Mandelson, Muslims as well as the Sharia for the UK Muslims.

I now stand up for the most despised group of all - MPs.

Things are now so bad for them that only

1. stringing all three of the party leaders to adjacent lamp-posts on Parliament Square

2. beheading this treacherous trinity and putting their heads on spikes on Tower Hill

3. joining the BNP en masse

could make them less unpopular.

(It looks like there is an unofficial vacancy for an MP shop stewardess. I wouldn't mind being Union Baroness if there is a job like that going, to be honest.)

Saturday, 11 July 2009

Direct Democracy = One Party State = Government of All Talents = National or Unity Government?

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/01/world/01zimbabwe.html?_r=1&ref=world

suggests that China is pleased that Zimbabwe is increasingly adopting its political system of a one-party state.

I like to think Mugabe was advised by China to give Tsvingirai a role in this new Unity Government or that he and his advisers cooked it up in the desire to sincerely flatter the Chinese with imitation.

It appears that our Frank Field is quite keen on the idea too, though he calls it a National Government.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/dec/08/government-debt-gilt-sales

Tory MP Douglas Carswell now speaks of "radical direct democracy" but does not appear to realise that government by referenda, without parties, is the logical conclusion of his not very radical proposals.

http://www.talkcarswell.com/show.aspx?id=751

A draft one-party state constitution can be found at

http://www.1party4all.co.uk/Home/Account/TopicForm.aspx?topicsId=107

If Britain's foreign policy of promoting the Special Relationship that is being America's Poodle is examined, it is simply because it just want to be best friends with the world's most powerful nation.

If that nation is no longer America, will Britain consider becoming a Pekingese?
If the British were to learn Chinese in its sink school state comprehensives, then it may be that its teaching establishment will have to acknowledge that there is no such thing as dyslexia, only defective and ineffective teaching methods, which would be A Good Thing.

The very nature of the Chinese language - which makes it such a horror to master - means that it cannot be properly learnt without using traditional teaching methods of rote learning, which the progressives have now completely abandoned in their ideological goal of securing equality of outcome, ie national innumeracy, illiteracy, illegitimacy, promiscuity, mediocrity, delinquency and decline.

Monday, 25 May 2009

Alan Johnson calls for referendum on electoral reform

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2009/05/nadine-dorries-on-suicidal-mps.html

Wow. Everybody is getting on the direct democracy bandwagon.

There's Douglas Carswell talking about his "radical direct democracy" (that is not as radical as my corporate direct democracy of votes proportional to tax contribution of voter), and Zac Goldsmith of the Tories and his local democracy.

Then there is Frank Field talking about a national government, in effect a one-party state, which would be logically necessary to administer pure direct democracy.

Now Alan Johnson wants a referendum on electoral reform.

Well, well, well.

They should all have a look at www.1party4all.co.uk.

Monday, 4 August 2008

10 policies for Labour to reinvogorate itself

I cannot imagine any sensible person in the Labour government wanting to lead the Labour Party to defeat in the next election. (It is a very disturbing conclusion to reach that there are no longer any sensible people left in the Labour government, apart from the principled and admirable Frank Field whom I would love to see becoming PM through Telling the Truth.) A Camoronian premiership is a historical inevitability, surely? Nor can I understand why Brown will not formally stake his claim on his absolute right to lead Labour into defeat at the next general election.

Blair is the only other "sensible person" left in the Labour Party fit to lead it into defeat. Perhaps he should be invited back into government and a by- election arranged to let him back in if he be fool enough to accept.

As for the new policies required to bring enliven Labour's lacklustre performance and policy drift, may I suggest proposals to:

(1) introduce an elitist, nationalist, rationalist but non-racist, non-expansionist one-party state run along the lines of the host of the Olympics 2008 who are doing so well for themselves

(2) reintroduce capital punishment and the principle of condign and economical punishment of criminals

(3) constitutionally establish the principle of limited government

(4) abolish the welfare state and reintroduce the concept of the deserving and undeserving poor and a government department to distinguish between the two

(5) introduce compulsory health insurance and dividing its provision into

(a) basic
(b) standard
(c) luxury

(6) give the British a referendum on the EU on an "in or out" basis

(7) disestablish the Church of England (and break the too-long connection with defeat, decline and dementia) and invite "tenders" from other faiths to replace it. The Muslims will probably have a few ideas about how Anglican Islam could be established.

(8) reinforce the British tradition of having a "Special Poodle Relationship" with the world's superpower and henceforth take active steps to become a Pekingese lapdog

(9) allow children to learn Mandarin in British schools as they used to learn European languages

(10) withdraw child benefit from any parent unable to produce a marriage certificate to prevent Britain becoming even more a Land of Illegitimacy, Illiteracy and Innumeracy or, not to put too fine a point on it, The Land of Bastardy and Bastards ...

Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...