A pro-Israeli view of a British gentile

"According to ABC News, Hamas rockets can now reach half of Israel's population. Today they aimed at a nuclear reactor, though the rocket was shot down. Why put up with this?

I am watching shouting Palestinians on the news. They are like Middle-Eastern Liverpudlians. If I were Israel I would deport all the remaining Palestinians to surrounding Arab countries. There is no such country as Palestine, after all.

Allowing them to continue to occupy the Gaza strip is merely fashioning a rod for one's own back. When they are all gone people will soon forget they were ever there. This would be better than bombing their women and children every few years in reprisal for rocket attacks. Best idea is to move them a safe distance away. In fact, as an Israeli I wouldn't tolerate a settlement so near my borders that was sending rockets further and further into my territory. As always, I am amazed at the forbearance of Israel."

"It could reduce the constant claims of 'genocide' and eliminate the need for regular bombing by annexing Gaza once and for all, dismantling Hamas and humanely deporting the remaining Palestinians. It is what Russia or a genuinely strong country would do. Having to live alongside a bunch of constantly rebellious Palestinians must be humiliating for Israel. It would be as if the United States had failed to deal properly with the Red Indians so the Americans are still attacked whenever they venture into the great plains!"

"Israel will no doubt attract international condemnation for bombing a disabled care home, but what good does tit for tat bombing do? Case for conquering Gaza seems unanswerable."

"It would be quite reasonable for Israelis to force regime change in Gaza, the administer the territory until it no longer poses a threat. Indeed, concessions could even be made to a less belligerent Palestine, just as smart new sports facilities were built in Brixton to discourage locals from rioting in the future. Israel hasn't really grown up enough as a nation: it worried about world opinion, yet Hamas easily beats in the propaganda war." 

************************
Why is the West indifferent to the fate of Palestinian Arabs in Israel?
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/115677967233
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/slavoj-zizek-dares-not-say-what-i-say.html

Not only is the West indifferent to the Palestinian Arabs, they are also indifferent to the Israelis.  If either side completely exterminated each other, the average gentile non-Muslim British voter would only shrug his shoulders. This is because the average gentile non-Muslim voter has distrusted the Jew for centuries and certainly dislikes having Muslims in his country.

Campaigning Muslims against the suffering of Muslims like Asghar Bukhari are barking up the wrong tree. Not only are gentile non-Muslim Britons indifferent to the death of Palestinian Muslims, they are also indifferent to the Israelis. Worse, British Muslims are also indifferent to the death and suffering of Muslims in other countries.

The only way to make them care is to offer a solution.  My solution is Secular Koranism which for some reason Asghar refuses to discuss.

I am basically saying:

1. The Israel project will fail unless Israel is a theocracy, because God did not want diaspora Jews coming back and just turning the modern state of Israel into a mere colonial outpost to provoke its Muslim neighbours. 
2. The Old Testament is too harsh stoning people to death at the drop of a hat.  
3. The New Testament is too vague and caused the Inquisition to be inflicted on Jews and Muslims.
4. The Koran is the Goldilocks religion for Israel.  
5. If Islam is "Judaism Lite", then Secular Koranism is "Islam Lite". 
6. A Caliph is basically a leader governing his state in accordance with Koranic principles.
7. A Caliphate is state governed according to Koranic principles.
8. Once Israel is a Caliphate governed by a Caliph, then the Jews, Christians and Muslims in it can co-exist together in one unitary state in a co-mingled crowed. 17:104 http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/017-qmt.php 
9. Judaism = Thesis; Christianity = Antithesis; Islam = Synthesis.
10. All the Abrahamic faiths promote the same moral values of a patriarchy and all worship the same God. The only issue is which religion gives guidelines that would achieve human flourishing in this life.  
11. Secular Koranism is a completely new idea that most orthodox Muslims hate and cannot bear to discuss.
12. Secular Koranism, while a theocracy in the sense that it is about infusing the laws of your country with Koranic principles, does not require anyone to convert to Islam nor will there be a corruptible priesthood be brought into existence to administer its laws. Any secular judiciary is capable of interpreting and applying Koranic principles if they are made aware of them.  
13. Under Secular Koranism brothels would be legal. http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2010/06/verse-in-koran-implicitly-condones.html
14. Under Secular Koranism a man may have up to four wives, if he has the means and the temperament to deal with 4 mothers-in law.  
15. Under Secular Koranism husbands may chastise their recalcitrant wives in the manner described at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/how-wife-beating-and-divorce-would-work.html
16. Under Secular Koranism there will be slut-shaming. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379?fref=ts
17. Under Secular Koranism we will have government by referenda. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shura
18. Under Secular Koranism usury will be abolished and we can all default on our debts and start again.
19. Under Secular Koranism the citizen will have a constitutional right not to be taxed more than a flat rate income tax of 20%. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums
20. Secular Koranism will abolish all totalitarian thought-crime anti-discrimination legislation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_anti-discrimination_acts, because the Koran states that "There is no compulsion in belief." 2:256
21. Secular Koranism will also abolish no fault divorce and require couples to agree marriage contracts before they can legally marry so that in the event of a divorce fault can be easily apportioned. In any divorce fault starts at 50/50 because at the very least the parties chose the wrong person to marry and must accept responsibility for that.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/03/islam-religion-of-politics-philosphy.html
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/what-is-secular-koranism.html

White Muslim convert refuses to discuss Secular Koranism presumably because he does not want to upset Asian Muslims
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/the-exchange-adassamad-clarke-and.html
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/abdassamad-clarke-muslim-scholar-blocks.html

The national and international uses of Secular Koranism
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2010/10/secular-koranism-weapon-to-defeat.html

How Secular Koranism would get taxpayers a flat rate income tax of 20%
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/it-is-already-illegal-to-evade-tax-so.html

How Secular Koranism would help gender and marital relations in the East and West
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/06/secular-koranism-is-secret-of-yin-and.html
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2010/06/my-interpretation-of-that-wife-beating.html

Secular Koranism would legalise brothels to break up existing matriarchal control of the supply of sex from sluts. A patriarchy would see to it that supply of sex would be mainly from wives and prostitutes.
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/feminists-want-prostitutes-dead-while.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/search?q=secular+Koranism

HOW TO SOLVE THE ISRAEL PROBLEM WITH SECULAR KORANISM
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/how-to-solve-problem-of-israel.html
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/how-leaders-fail-by-rabbi-sacks.html
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2010/12/on-israel-and-her-allies.html
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/my-nakba-dayisrael-independence-day.html
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/peace-in-middle-east-questions-to-ask.html
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/rabbi-says-islam-is-religion-of-future.html

Conservative lawyers should prepare themselves for a competition to draft the principles of the Conservative Party

While I do not wish to be guilty of counting my chickens before the eggs are hatched, perhaps it is no bad thing to visualise the success of my application to seek permission to apply for judicial review against the Conservative Party's irrational and improper decision to expel me for behaving in a way that was claimed to by the Secretary of the Board of the Conservative Party to be "wholly inconsistent with its aims, values and principles" while

1. refusing to tell me what they are;
2. being unable to tell me what they are;
3. apparently claiming that the puffery contained in David Cameron's Foreword in their 2010 General Election Manifesto amounts to a Statement of Principles, let alone Conservative Party principles;
4. being unable to show me in any way at all how my behaviour or beliefs were contrary to the principles of the Conservative Party, whatever they are.

God, if He exists, would surely approve of what I am trying to do, get Conservatives to declare what exactly it is that they stand for.   

God, if He exists, would disapprove deeply of any nation in which gay marriage is legal.  His disapproval might reach Sodom and Gomorrah levels, who knows, and we are not that far away from a still active volcano in Iceland.   

God, if He exists, would be horror-stricken and incandescent that such a morally offensive proposal should come from a male Conservative Prime Minister, of all people.   

In the light of such indecently liberal interpretations of what Conservative Party principles might be, I think it would be just easier of we made the Koran a baseline for Conservative values simply because the punishments are a lot less harsh than the punishments in the Old Testament.  The Church of England used to be known as the Conservative Party at prayer.  Now, however, the Church of England is liberals not at prayer condoning if not actually encouraging extramarital sex.   

Applying the Goldilocks principle described at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldilocks_principle therefore, the Koran would be the happy medium.   

Clearly, the difficulty in practising Conservative values is because they have never been properly defined.  Because no one knows what they are, no one knows when they are being strayed from.  

It is therefore easier to point to a book that is considered morally authoritative that also contains hang 'em, flog 'em principles so beloved of Conservatives of the old school.

Direct democracy ie government by referendum would tend to give expression to the will of the people.  This would come under the Koranic principle of Shura.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shura

A 20% flat rate income tax would be welcome to many hard-pressed businessmen choked by red tape told that tax avoidance is now considered by an increasingly corrupt and irrational government to be  the same as tax evasion.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums

What possible objection can men and women have to giving men the option of having up to four wives?

Or to lashing SSMs 100 times in public to discourage women from being sluts and becoming single mothers who are a burden on the state?

Only the feminists and liberals would object.  But then they would, wouldn't they?

The point is that they are not Conservative and none of their silly ideas should be taken seriously by a properly-run Conservative government with proper Conservative principles.