THE VOICE OF REASON
Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
1) Ban contraception except for married couples who have completed their families and registered prostitutes working in licensed brothels.
2) Shame sluts and slut-fuckers with quran.com/24/2
3) Punish sodomites with quran.com/4/16
4) Abolish gay marriage.
5) Abolish no fault divorce.
6) Stigmatise divorce.
7) Introduce the marriage contract to reintroduce fault into divorce as breach of contract.
8) Repeal all totalitarian thoughtcrime anti-discrimination legislation.
9) Narrow the franchise to taxpayers only.
10) Protect the right of the taxpayer not to pay more than a flat rate income tax of 20% to prevent the rise of a parasitic class.
11) Introduce humane slavery as an alternative form of welfare because hirers and owners of slaves have a duty to house and feed them.
12) Appoint Slave Visitors to see that government property ie slaves is not being damaged and also to see that the slave is working properly.
2:00 The difference between Christian reasoning and Jewish and Muslim reasoning
2:45 Christian values
3:00 Christian values that Baruch finds abhorrent
3:45 Christianity is about saying you believe things which you may not necessarily believe in to be one of the gang, Judaism and Islam is about actually doing things in a rule-based way.
4:30 "The more disturbing aspects of fundamentalist Christianity" - the threat of hell
8:00 The universal love of Christianity
9:00 Islam is also claims this
9:15 Ditto Judaism
10:00 Eastern religions are not monotheist at all.
11:00 If you don't believe in the Trinity, you are not Christian
12:00 Justice and Love
14:00 Compassion for the criminal
14:30 The mumsy view of Christianity: forgive everything, tolerate everything
16:00 The idolatry and blasphemy of the Trinity
17:00 Jews are understandably shy of pointing out to Christians the idolatry of Christianity bearing in mind their tradition of persecuting of Jews
17:30 The chaos of Christianity according to Baruch
18:30 Jews and Muslims pray to the ineffable Abrahamic God, while Christians pray to an executed revolutionary or his mum
19:30 God is rather more than the mumsy comforting woman who is your mate's mum that you might bump into at the supermarket
20:00 Shavuot - the cosmic marriage between God and Jews https://www.huffingtonpost.com/levi-benshmuel/shavuot-love-lessons-from_b_872203.html
The Bible also says this about God: “And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart” https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+6%3A6&version=NIV
23:00 Secular Koranism is just a boring little idea to prop up the patriarchy and deprive you of extramarital sex to continue the existence of your tribe, society, nation and civilisation
26:00 Marriage is a eugenic game of musical chairs being played from generation to generation
27:00 Conservatism
28:00 Gay marriage
29:00 Flexible monogamy is a lower standard than traditional marriage
30:00 John Major's Back to Basics campaign
30:30 The meaninglessness of unprincipled mainstream of Conservatism which brought in gay marriage under a Conservative Prime Minister
32:00 But for Judaism, Jews would not exist.
33:00 Marriage is an institution for all advanced civilisations, not just for the Abrahamic faiths
34:00 The nihilism of atheism and childlessness
35:00 If Baruch had children, he would want to pass on Judaism to his offspring
37:00 The benefit of having a cultural identity imposed on you even if you reject it at the time or subsequently reject it
39:00 Tradition is what we do to please our fathers.
40:00 White nationalists don't even have a cultural identity to reject and now have to go about creating an identity that they can accept and they cannot agree on this. Most are antisemites, many are not even Christian, and those who want to regress into paganism will not have the support of the majority. White nationalism is dead in the water if white nationalists refuse to acknowledge the need to restore the patriarchy and continue to reject the utility of organised religion.
42:00 Spiritual self-transcendence
45:00 Football matches
46:00 Football chants and war cries https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxL24XYFV7w
"By 1996, 70 percent of inmates in state juvenile detention centers serving long-term sentences were raised by single mothers. Seventy-two percent of juvenile murderers and 60 percent of rapists come from single-mother homes. Seventy percent of teenage births, dropouts, suicides, runaways, juvenile delinquents, and child murderers involve children raised by single mothers. Girls raised without fathers are more sexually promiscuous and more likely to end up divorced. A 1990 study by the Progressive Policy Institute showed that after controlling for single motherhood, the difference between black and white crime rates disappeared."
Feminism is dangerous to your liberty if it is indeed true that feminism causes
false rape accusations to be successfully prosecuted in courts where a defendant is no longer treated as innocent till proven guilty after a fair trial
in a country where the Director of Public Prosecutions is female,
where the Chairman of the Bar Council is female,
where the Home Secretary is female,
where the Prime Minister is also female
and where most female MPs are for gay marriage and against leaving the EU.
The more promiscuous the women, the more shameless the women. The more shameless the women, the more likely they are to report rape.
The more promiscuous the women, the stupider they are. The stupider they are, the more likely they will be pumped and dumped.
The more women are pumped and dumped, the more likely they will be angry and bitter about being pumped and dumped.
The more angry and bitter women are about a lifetime of being pumped and dumped, the more likely they are to falsely accuse a man of rape, especially if a successful conviction entitles them to £11,000. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7555299.stm
Is feminism even more totalitarian than a theocracy that guarantees the freedom of belief the way Islam does at quran.com/2/256?
Is it not the case that all anti-discrimination legislation is in fact thoughtcrime passed by feminists and their running dogs?
In the UK the Equality Act 2010 contains most of the thoughtcrime passed by our matriarchy which is clearly unIslamic under 2:256 of the Koran.
Is patriarchy less restrictive on your liberty than feminism because it gives you the constitutional right not to be taxed more than a flat rate tax of 20%?
Would not a patriarchy - a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers - be more lightly governed than a matriarchy - a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers with illegitimate offspring whom they badly parent?
Is it not abundantly clear that patriarchy is what all rational and moral citizens both men and women should choose while booting out our degenerate matriarchy that was built on decades of feminist legislation which could be repealed at the stroke of the pen?
Has feminism turned our male MPs into spineless worms afraid of their own shadow, terrified of being divorced under the rules of no fault divorce by their entitled wives, accused of a historic sexual offence or deprived of their matrimonial home and children in the family court whose judges are mostly female?
Is the matriarchy we are living under losing too many of its marbles?
Are you getting sick of the government not knowing its mind like a dithering woman suffering from dementia? Not only do they not know their own mind they are also behaving like they are incapable of logic, which is yet another unpleasant feminine trait.
Will it be long before Gary Barlow et al find themselves being accused of paedophilia and all kinds of sexual offences so slags can get a slice of their action?
Doesn't the government tax us enough already?
Would rich people who feel they have already paid enough as tax as it is support Secular Koranism? It would offer them the constitutional right not be taxed more than a 20% flat rate income tax. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums
Bandmates: Barlow (centre) as well as Mark Owen (right) and Howard Donald (second from left) used the scheme. There is no suggestion that either Robbie Williams or Jason Orange, also pictured, were involved.
Are the former members of TAKE THAT potential supporters and sponsors of SECULAR KORANISM? Wouldn't it be GREAT if they could form a band called SECULAR KORANISM and sing about the virtues of a Secular Koranist Britain that would replace our demented matriarchy that taxes everyone far too much?
008.041
YUSUFALI: And know that out of all the booty that ye may acquire (in war), a fifth share is assigned to Allah,- and to the Messenger, and to near relatives, orphans, the needy, and the wayfarer,- if ye do believe in Allah and in the revelation We sent down to Our servant on the Day of Testing,- the Day of the meeting of the two forces. For Allah hath power over all things.
PICKTHAL: And know that whatever ye take as spoils of war, lo! a fifth thereof is for Allah, and for the messenger and for the kinsman (who hath need) and orphans and the needy and the wayfarer, if ye believe in Allah and that which We revealed unto Our slave on the Day of Discrimination, the day when the two armies met. And Allah is Able to do all things.
SHAKIR: And know that whatever thing you gain, a fifth of it is for Allah and for the Messenger and for the near of kin and the orphans and the needy and the wayfarer, if you believe in Allah and in that which We revealed to Our servant, on the day of distinction, the day on which the two parties met; and Allah has power over all things.
I interpret this to mean that the Koran says we should have a 20% flat rate income tax.
While I do not wish to be guilty of counting my chickens before the eggs are hatched, perhaps it is no bad thing to visualise the success of my application to seek permission to apply for judicial review against the Conservative Party's irrational and improper decision to expel me for behaving in a way that was claimed to by the Secretary of the Board of the Conservative Party to be "wholly inconsistent with its aims, values and principles" while
refusing to tell me what they are;
being unable to tell me what they are;
apparently claiming that the puffery contained in David Cameron's Foreword in their 2010 General Election Manifesto amounts to a Statement of Principles, let alone Conservative Party principles;
being unable to show me in any way at all how my behaviour or beliefs were contrary to the principles of the Conservative Party, whatever they are.
God, if He exists, would surely approve of what I am trying to do, get Conservatives to declare what exactly it is that they stand for.
God, if He exists, would disapprove deeply of any nation in which gay marriage is legal. His disapproval might reach Sodom and Gomorrah levels, who knows, and we are not that far away from a still active volcano in Iceland.
God, if He exists, would be horror-stricken and incandescent that such a morally offensive proposal should come from a male Conservative Prime Minister, of all people.
In the light of such indecently liberal interpretations of what Conservative Party principles might be, I think it would be just easier of we made the Koran a baseline for Conservative values simply because the punishments are a lot less harsh than the punishments in the Old Testament. The Church of England used to be known as the Conservative Party at prayer. Now, however, the Church of England is liberals not at prayer condoning if not actually encouraging extramarital sex.
Clearly, the difficulty in practising Conservative values is because they have never been properly defined. Because no one knows what they are, no one knows when they are being strayed from.
It is therefore easier to point to a book that is considered morally authoritative that also contains hang 'em, flog 'em principles so beloved of Conservatives of the old school.
Direct democracy ie government by referendum would tend to give expression to the will of the people. This would come under the Koranic principle of Shura. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shura
A 20% flat rate income tax would be welcome to many hard-pressed businessmen choked by red tape told that tax avoidance is now considered by an increasingly corrupt and irrational government to be the same as tax evasion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums
What possible objection can men and women have to giving men the option of having up to four wives?
Or to lashing SSMs 100 times in public to discourage women from being sluts and becoming single mothers who are a burden on the state?
Only the feminists and liberals would object. But then they would, wouldn't they?
The point is that they are not Conservative and none of their silly ideas should be taken seriously by a properly-run Conservative government with proper Conservative principles.
Only God can defeat the matriarchy now. (What is the matriarchy? Being told that you already live in a matriarchy is the national equivalent of being told you have cancer and must have an operation to remove the cancerous tumour, or the doctor telling you that your gangrenous limb must be amputated, or you will die.)
God is the policeman in people's minds.
God is cheaper than CCTV.
God is an instrument of government. (Seneca: "Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful.")
Only the corporal punishment of sex criminals as prescribed by the Koran (and this includes fornicators and fornicatresses, adulterers and adulteresses as well as sodomites and ladies committing lewd acts where there are four witnesses) will destroy the pornocratic matriarchy who corrupt the morals of the nation, bringing about ever lowering standards of behaviour and education as well as national and civilisational degeneracy.
A minimum state does not mean the law of the jungle, but a state with a minimum of laws that is consistent with civilised life.
To remain civilised, we must have agreed standards of morality.
To have a minimum state, most people must have some knowledge and see the need to obey certain rules of morality.
The only way to instill morality is to have a state ideology. A state ideology can be without a deity, eg Nazism, Fascism, Communism, Liberalism, Feminism, Socialism, Secularism, Welfarism etc but a state ideology will be most efficient and enduring if there exists a general belief in the existence of a moral, unique and omnipotent God.
If truth be told, even atheists occasionally find comfort in the idea that a unique, omnipotent and moral God might exist, might care for them and might occasionally deign to answer their prayers. It is therefore not that difficult to do if enough people who matter agree that this should be done.
God has already been invented. (Voltaire: "If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent Him.") The concept of God certainly exists, as does the concept of Heaven, Hell, unicorns, fairies, angels, demons and leprechauns. Whether or not we believe in His actual existence, it would be a waste to let this idea sit on the shelf unused when so many things in Britain need to be fixed by good laws that maintain morality by a moral and rational government that acknowledges that its only purpose is to serve the long term national interest.
This is clearly a Guardian hatchet job against the Tea Party Movement by Nicholas Lezard, but I just want this on record, OK?
I cannot abide Ayn Rand's prose for one thing.
All who want a minimum state must concede that there must be some absolute minimum form of government to be aimed for that is consistent with human flourishing.
Libertarianism is not a return to the law of the jungle where only might is right.
The minimum of laws and principles of government I have in mind are the ones articulated in the Koran though I am an atheist, but an atheist who cannot find a guide for humanity better than the Koran.
How is the Koran libertarian?
It forbids compulsion in belief.
This means it forbids all thoughtcrime legislation.
Lift the ban on Claire Khaw and her associates joining UKIP
Make one woman think tank Claire Khaw Director of Communications
Make one woman think tank Claire Khaw Policy Consultant
Allow her the opportunity of forgiving the cowards and hypocrites in UKIP who are fearful, uncertain and exercised about her becoming a member by the simple expedient of inviting her to become leader. She is guaranteed to graciously accept such an offer by the party and will easily step into the shoes of Nigel Farage and do a better job than him.
Hong Kong: Some sources claim that Hong Kong has a flat tax, though its salary tax structure has several different rates ranging from 2% to 20% after deductions. Taxes are capped at 16% of gross income, so this rate is applied to upper income returns if taxes would exceed 16% of gross otherwise. Accordingly, Duncan B. Black of Media Matters for America, says "Hong Kong's 'flat tax' is better described as an 'alternative maximum tax.'" Alan Reynolds of the Cato Institute similarly notes that Hong Kong's "tax on salaries is not flat but steeply progressive." Hong Kong has, nevertheless, a flat profit tax regime.
Taxes that are constitutionally guaranteed not to exceed 20% appear to have the blessing of the Islamic God, it would appear, so we might as well make use of it in the hard times ahead. UKIP can thus appeal to the Muslim swing voter instead of being accused of Islamophobia yet again.
No taxes levied by the government shall exceed 20%.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performance_fee 20% is a sort of magic number in that it seems to be the most you can make a person willingly pay without resorting to evasion or avoidance.
Inheritance and capital gains tax shall be abolished.
Come on, UKIP, grow a pair at your conference this September!
The basic principle in fighting in the Quran is that other communities should be treated as one's own. Fighting is justified for legitimate self-defense, to aid other Muslims and after a violation in the terms of a treaty, but should be stopped if these circumstances cease to exist. The principle of forgiveness is reiterated in between the assertions of the right to self-defence.
Below are the two verses that the British transgressed against when their government declared war on Germany in both WW1 and WW2:
002.190
YUSUFALI: Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for Allah loveth not transgressors.
PICKTHAL: Fight in the way of Allah against those who fight against you, but begin not hostilities. Lo! Allah loveth not aggressors.
SHAKIR: And fight in the way of Allah with those who fight with you, and do not exceed the limits, surely Allah does not love those who exceed the limits.
022.039
YUSUFALI: To those against whom war is made, permission is given (to fight), because they are wronged;- and verily, Allah is most powerful for their aid;-
PICKTHAL: Sanction is given unto those who fight because they have been wronged; and Allah is indeed Able to give them victory;
SHAKIR: Permission (to fight) is given to those upon whom war is made because they are oppressed, and most surely Allah is well able to assist them;
What was WW1 about?
Belgian neutrality.
What has Belgian neutrality to do with Britain when it was not being directly threatened by Germany? This was oddly not mentioned in any of my history lessons. I cannot remember it anyway.
What was WW2 about?
It was about Germany invading Poland.
Do we know that as recently as the 1600s the Poles had a German king? Poland was the backyard of Germany. Hitler thought the British would be reasonable about Poland and all that huffing and puffing by Chamberlain about Germany not invading Poland was really just for British domestic consumption That was his fatal mistake. How could he expect the British to have been reasonable about Poland when they had been so stupid about Belgian neutrality?
Of course, Hitler should not have invaded Poland either, for doing so was unIslamic.
There was a time when the British were unconsciously doing what the Koran recommends. That was how they became wealthy and powerful.
And then, they stopped being unconsciously Islamic and did all sorts of stupid things after they became too much infected with liberalism and feminism.
Just as it was unIslamic for Hitler to have invaded Poland, Britain's declaring war on Germany was unIslamic too.
Every war is a GAMBLE.
The Koran tells us not to gamble, and the British lost the gamble and consequently their empire.
What did they do after they lost their gamble and their empire?
They comforted themselves with WINE, WOMEN, SONG and USURY, worshipping the Gods of Mammon, Consumerism and Sexual Liberation while desecrating the institutions of family and marriage.
And so did the rest of the Western world.
And now the party is over.
But what else are we doing that we should not be doing?
Usury is prohibited in the Koran but we are still being consumed by debt and creating even more with our hair of the dog economic policies. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riba
All that business with the banks in trouble over manipulating LIBOR perfectly demonstrates that borrowing and lending with interest means we will be consumed by our debts.
Extramarital sex is prohibited in the Koran but now there are more bastards being born in Britain than there are legitimate babies. If we lashed 100 times SSMs then there would certainly be fewer of them, but it seems we won't be doing that any time soon, judging from the reaction I get when I recommend this. http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/koran-clearer-than-bible-about.html
I fear that by the time the British finally acknowledge the gravity of the situation they will have to end up stoning those who indulged in extramarital sex to death to discourage their infamously promiscuous women, because they would be such hardcore sluts that even lashing them 100 times will not make them stop breeding their bastards like vermin.
We should have a flat rate income tax of 20% with the rest made up in charitable donations. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums This would be better than confusing tax evasion with tax avoidance until anyone with any enterprise becomes a tax exile.
We really should have a referendum about the EU, but our government refuses to give us this option thus offending the principle of consulting the governed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shura
The abolition of the death penalty is unKoranic since the Koran prescribes it, where just. [6:151]
I am saying basically, that nations and people who are unIslamic will suffer terribly and will have to submit to the horrors of Truth, Justice and Reason, eventually.
If only the totality of Koranic exhortations and prohibitions could be distilled into a list. This list can then be ticked (or not the case may be) to discover which nation in the world is the one most in harmony with Koranic principles. I am pretty sure that the one most conforming to Koranic principles will be the one most happy and glorious.
“If member states leave EMU, what is the best way for the economic process to be managed to provide the soundest foundation for the future growth and prosperity of the current membership?”
My 21 Point Plan for all current members of the EU for future growth and prosperity:
1.Start printing own currency.
2.Withdraw from both the euro and the EU.
3.Institute a barter system to be used while new currency stabilises.
4.Default, but guaranteeing savings only, and let the losses fall where they may.
5.Abolish usury.
6.Cut taxes, deregulate and repeal unnecessarily restrictive PC liberal socialist feminist laws. Remind people that our freedoms consist of the (a) freedom of association (b) freedom of expression (c) freedom of contract (c) the right to property.
7.Establish citizens’ militias to deal with civil disorder and crime.
8.Establish soup kitchens (which will also serve as unofficial labour exchanges operating the same number-wearing system as Thai brothels in Patpong) so no one starves.
9.Establish brothels so never-married mothers have some means of earning a living with flexible hours.
10.Grant a temporary right to bear arms to respectable non-criminal citizens until things quieten down.
11.Encourage marriage.
12.Decree that no marriage can take place without a marriage contract.
13.Decree that all marriages will now have their terms either renegotiated or be put in a standard default form.
14.Decree that no divorce can take place without blame being apportioned to be reflected in the divorce settlement.
15.Treat never-married mothers as women who are a degree below prostitutes. If there are two women: a prostitute and a never-married mother, say, a man should give up his seat for a woman who is a prostitute but not a slut single mother (“SSM”). He gives up his seat to the prostitute first. Only if the prostitute declines should he give up his seat to the SSM.
16.Repeal totalitarian liberal anti-discrimination thoughtcrime legislation in employment that encourages those who are disabled, of the “wrong” sex orientation, the “wrong” race, the “wrong” sex and the “wrong” age (as far as the employer is concerned) to sue their employer that make businesses reluctant to hire because they cannot easily fire.
17.Praise the masculine virtues of enterprise, risk-taking, courage and reason.
18.Denounce the feminine vices of promiscuity, hypocrisy, cowardice, and irrationality.
19.Destroy feminism as a respectable political orthodoxy, implement Secular Koranism (ie national law infused with Koranic principles) which include capital and corporal punishment, family values, direct democracy - "shura" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shura and a 20% flat rate income tax – “khums” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums) to return society to masculine and parental authority and away from the matriarchal dementia that has been inflicted on us, to avoid civilisational extinction.
20.Praise respectable married women for being good wives and mothers while denouncing SSMs.
21.Abolish the welfare state to prevent feminism from ever raising its ugly head again.
I have also entered the Orwell Prize.
My submissions for the 2012 Orwell Prize for blogging are as follows:
Unfortunately for me, Suzanne Moore and Hopi Sen - both with known Labour connections - are this year's judges. Suzanne Moore (an SSM herself as well as a socialist and feminist) has even started a campaign to get people to block me on twitter and unfriend me on Facebook too, I believe. I do not therefore expect to make even the longlist if Suzanne gets her way, so winning the Wolfson Prize would be a very nice consolation prize indeed.
Form a party with the stated intention of merging the Eurosceptic parties and concentrating the Eurosceptic vote so that Muscular Euroscepticism can at last be implemented.
Challenge Feminism. While this appears a little frightening, my strategy is based on the very sound one of dividing voters along gender lines. Once voters are divided between men and women, there can surely be no excuse for even the current lot of effeminate degenerate men to win the argument against the current lot of sluttish and degenerate women. I tell you it can be done, and should certainly be attempted.
Propose the narrowing of the franchise to only taxpayers who pay a minimum of tax in order to disenfranchise Slut Single Mums, welfare scroungers and the unproductive.
Propose the end of usury and pioneer an Islamic banking system that does not encourage irresponsible lending and borrowing by both governments and individuals. (John Tyndall's chapter BEYOND CAPITALISM AND SOCIALISM in THE ELEVENTH HOUR has given me a few ideas, which I propose to try out once the current system implodes.) http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/11/economic-nationalism.html
Daniel Hannan, "the evangelist for the much smaller state" commented on Britain's "relative social fragmentation", and pointed out that "state spending is now 40% of GDP". "Efficiency of the state starts to fall of once it starts to raise more than 20% of the GDP, and there are serious diminishing returns once the percentage of wealth taken by the state goes above the necessary minimum."
"The expansion of the state has frayed the bonds that used to tie people together. It was not very long ago when an adult, seeing a child out of the classroom in school time, would have stopped the child and asked: 'Why aren't you in school?' and that's now seen as the responsibility of the state. Not so very long ago you would check to make sure that an elderly neighbour was picking up their milk every morning. Now that is seen as the responsibility of Social Services. Every time the state presumes to do something that was previously done by communities we become less good citizens and, yes, there may be money being saved, but that's an incidental side effect. This is primarily about making us more responsible.
Nick Boles is a fraud, a shit and pompous with it.
20% is the magic number. It is the magic number, folks. The Koran recommends that as the top rate of tax and hedge funds know that it is the most you can make people willingly pay for a service.
Perhaps one day soon Dan Hannan will become leader of the Tory Party. His understanding of Conservatism is demonstrated by the way he so ably and elegantly articulates its principles. Cameron and his cunts of convictionless Conservatism can then fuck off to New Generation New Labour or even the LibDems or whatever where I am sure they will be ideologically at home, and the Tory Party can once more be a party for Conservatives.
No doubt Cameron and his Commie cronies will do their utmost to prevent Hannan from getting a safe seat.
