How to get lockdown lifted using the Koran

If Covid-19 came from God, who would He be punishing? 

Sinning Jews and sinning gentiles.

Who would be the sinning Jews?

Anyone guilty of the 36 capital offences of the Old Testament.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/judaism/jewishethics/capital.shtml

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_capital_crimes_in_the_Torah

So Jews guilty of these capital offences would be sentenced to death? Seems a bit harsh.

If Jewish standards of behaviour are too high for these errant Jews, they could convert to Islam and/or support Secular Koranism.

https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/96RQWJV.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

What about Christianity? 

That is not from God, but some guys called Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Paul etc.

So they would have to support Secular Koranism to escape the death penalty?

Yes. There is no other divine revelation for gentiles from the Abrahamic God who divided humanity into Jews and gentiles having first revealed the Torah to Jews and then the Koran to gentiles. The Koran guarantees freedom of belief with quran.com/2/256 so it would be unIslamic to forcibly convert anyone to Islam.

So they can support Secular Koranism as Jews and not have to convert to Islam?

That is exactly the idea.  

Do Muslims support Secular Koranism?

Most of them haven't heard of it.

Why should Jews support Secular Koranism if Muslims do not?

Because I anticipate Muslims would call my new school of sharia of Secular Koranism illegitimate, since I am agnostic and not Muslim.  

If you are agnostic, why you are you asking questions as if you thought God exists?

Because I can imagine what someone who believes in God would believe and fear if He thought Covd-19 was divine punishment. 

Does the Koran provide a solution to the pandemic?

Yes, the process of consultation called shura.  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shura

How would shura/consultation solve the problem of lockdown?

The government would consult business organisations and trade unions about whether to lift lockdown, businesses and trade unions would consult their members, members would vote on it, and if both employers and employees agree to lift lockdown, it would be lifted. Can't say fairer than that, can you?

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/coronavirus-support-from-business-representative-organisations-and-trade-associations

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-list-of-active-trade-unions-official-list-and-schedule/trade-unions-the-current-list-and-schedule

Conservative lawyers should prepare themselves for a competition to draft the principles of the Conservative Party

While I do not wish to be guilty of counting my chickens before the eggs are hatched, perhaps it is no bad thing to visualise the success of my application to seek permission to apply for judicial review against the Conservative Party's irrational and improper decision to expel me for behaving in a way that was claimed to by the Secretary of the Board of the Conservative Party to be "wholly inconsistent with its aims, values and principles" while

1. refusing to tell me what they are;
2. being unable to tell me what they are;
3. apparently claiming that the puffery contained in David Cameron's Foreword in their 2010 General Election Manifesto amounts to a Statement of Principles, let alone Conservative Party principles;
4. being unable to show me in any way at all how my behaviour or beliefs were contrary to the principles of the Conservative Party, whatever they are.

God, if He exists, would surely approve of what I am trying to do, get Conservatives to declare what exactly it is that they stand for.   

God, if He exists, would disapprove deeply of any nation in which gay marriage is legal.  His disapproval might reach Sodom and Gomorrah levels, who knows, and we are not that far away from a still active volcano in Iceland.   

God, if He exists, would be horror-stricken and incandescent that such a morally offensive proposal should come from a male Conservative Prime Minister, of all people.   

In the light of such indecently liberal interpretations of what Conservative Party principles might be, I think it would be just easier of we made the Koran a baseline for Conservative values simply because the punishments are a lot less harsh than the punishments in the Old Testament.  The Church of England used to be known as the Conservative Party at prayer.  Now, however, the Church of England is liberals not at prayer condoning if not actually encouraging extramarital sex.   

Applying the Goldilocks principle described at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldilocks_principle therefore, the Koran would be the happy medium.   

Clearly, the difficulty in practising Conservative values is because they have never been properly defined.  Because no one knows what they are, no one knows when they are being strayed from.  

It is therefore easier to point to a book that is considered morally authoritative that also contains hang 'em, flog 'em principles so beloved of Conservatives of the old school.

Direct democracy ie government by referendum would tend to give expression to the will of the people.  This would come under the Koranic principle of Shura.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shura

A 20% flat rate income tax would be welcome to many hard-pressed businessmen choked by red tape told that tax avoidance is now considered by an increasingly corrupt and irrational government to be  the same as tax evasion.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums

What possible objection can men and women have to giving men the option of having up to four wives?

Or to lashing SSMs 100 times in public to discourage women from being sluts and becoming single mothers who are a burden on the state?

Only the feminists and liberals would object.  But then they would, wouldn't they?

The point is that they are not Conservative and none of their silly ideas should be taken seriously by a properly-run Conservative government with proper Conservative principles.  

Disobey the Koran AT YOUR OWN PERIL

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qur%27an_and_violence

The basic principle in fighting in the Quran is that other communities should be treated as one's own. Fighting is justified for legitimate self-defense, to aid other Muslims and after a violation in the terms of a treaty, but should be stopped if these circumstances cease to exist.  The principle of forgiveness is reiterated in between the assertions of the right to self-defence.

Below are the two verses that the British transgressed against when their government declared war on Germany in both WW1 and WW2:

002.190
YUSUFALI: Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for Allah loveth not transgressors.
PICKTHAL: Fight in the way of Allah against those who fight against you, but begin not hostilities. Lo! Allah loveth not aggressors.
SHAKIR: And fight in the way of Allah with those who fight with you, and do not exceed the limits, surely Allah does not love those who exceed the limits.

022.039
YUSUFALI: To those against whom war is made, permission is given (to fight), because they are wronged;- and verily, Allah is most powerful for their aid;-
PICKTHAL: Sanction is given unto those who fight because they have been wronged; and Allah is indeed Able to give them victory;
SHAKIR: Permission (to fight) is given to those upon whom war is made because they are oppressed, and most surely Allah is well able to assist them;

What was WW1 about?

Belgian neutrality.

What has Belgian neutrality to do with Britain when it was not being directly threatened by Germany?  This was oddly not mentioned in any of my history lessons.  I cannot remember it anyway.

What was WW2 about?

It was about Germany invading Poland.

Do we know that as recently as the 1600s the Poles had a German king?  Poland was the backyard of Germany.   Hitler thought the British would be reasonable about Poland and all that huffing and puffing by Chamberlain about Germany not invading Poland was really just for British domestic consumption  That was his fatal mistake.   How could he expect the British to have been reasonable about Poland when they had been so stupid about Belgian neutrality?

Of course, Hitler should not have invaded Poland either, for doing so was unIslamic.

There was a time when the British were unconsciously doing what the Koran recommends. That was how they became wealthy and powerful.

And then, they stopped being unconsciously Islamic and did all sorts of stupid things after they became too much infected with liberalism and feminism.

Just as it was unIslamic for Hitler to have invaded Poland, Britain's declaring war on Germany was unIslamic too.

Every war is a GAMBLE.

The Koran tells us not to gamble, and the British lost the gamble and consequently their empire.

What did they do after they lost their gamble and their empire?

They comforted themselves with WINE, WOMEN, SONG and USURY, worshipping the Gods of Mammon, Consumerism and Sexual Liberation while desecrating the institutions of family and marriage.

And so did the rest of the Western world.

And now the party is over.

But what else are we doing that we should not be doing?

Usury is prohibited in the Koran but we are still being consumed by debt and creating even more with our hair of the dog economic policies.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riba

All that business with the banks in trouble over manipulating LIBOR perfectly demonstrates that borrowing and lending with interest means we will be consumed by our debts.

Extramarital sex is prohibited in the Koran but now there are more bastards being born in Britain than there are legitimate babies.   If we lashed 100 times SSMs then there would certainly be fewer of them, but it seems we won't be doing that any time soon, judging from the reaction I get when I recommend this.  http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/koran-clearer-than-bible-about.html

I fear that by the time the British finally acknowledge the gravity of the situation they will have to end up stoning those who indulged in extramarital sex to death to discourage their infamously promiscuous women, because they would be such hardcore sluts that even lashing them 100 times will not make them stop breeding their bastards like vermin.

We should have a flat rate income tax of 20% with the rest made up in charitable donations. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums  This would be better than confusing tax evasion with tax avoidance until anyone with any enterprise becomes a tax exile.

We really should have a referendum about the EU, but our government refuses to give us this option thus offending the principle of consulting the governed.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shura

The abolition of the death penalty is unKoranic since the Koran prescribes it, where just.   [6:151]

http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/006-qmt.php

I am saying basically, that nations and people who are unIslamic will suffer terribly and will have to submit to the horrors of Truth, Justice and Reason, eventually.

If only the totality of Koranic exhortations and prohibitions could be distilled into a list.  This list can then be ticked (or not the case may be) to discover which nation in the world is the one most in harmony with Koranic principles.  I am pretty sure that the one most conforming to Koranic principles will be the one most happy and glorious.   

My to do list for drawing a line under the failures of liberalism by the next election

1. Form a party with the stated intention of merging the Eurosceptic parties and concentrating the Eurosceptic vote so that Muscular Euroscepticism can at last be implemented.
2. Challenge Feminism.  While this appears a little frightening, my strategy  is based on the very sound one of dividing voters along gender lines.   Once voters are divided between men and women, there can surely be no excuse for even the current lot of effeminate degenerate men to win the argument against the current lot of sluttish and degenerate women.  I tell you it can be done, and should certainly be attempted.      
3. Propose a one-party state in which the rights of MPs are protected from the leader and his cronies as proposed by Peter Bone MP's House of Commons (Disqualification) Bill.   http://conservativehome.blogs.com/parliament/2010/10/peter-bone-seeks-to-abolish-the-flatterers-cajolers-and-sometime-bullies-that-are-the-party-whips.html
4. Propose government by consultation and referenda.
5. Propose the narrowing of the franchise to only taxpayers who pay a minimum of tax in order  to disenfranchise Slut Single Mums, welfare scroungers and the unproductive.  
6. Propose a 20% flat rate income tax along the lines set out in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums
7. Propose the end of usury and pioneer an Islamic banking system that does not encourage irresponsible lending and borrowing by both governments and individuals.  (John Tyndall's chapter BEYOND CAPITALISM AND SOCIALISM in THE ELEVENTH HOUR has given me a few ideas, which I propose to try out once the current system implodes.)  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/11/economic-nationalism.html

If Britain had been an Islamic state operating a system of direct democracy before WW2 Britain would not have lost its empire

Direct democracy is the only form of democracy worth discussing. That was the purest form of democracy as practised by the Ancient Greeks, and it is this version that the Koran recommends.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shura#cite_note-1

The Ancient Greeks voted on what laws to pass and what laws to repeal and whether to go to war.

Governments who consult the governed fare better than the rest because they can at least have a proper debate, take responsibility for whatever was decided and move on, while we cannot, because we feel abused, marginalised, ignored and betrayed.

Imagine, if the British had been asked about WW2, would Britain have lost its empire that was acquired with so much blood, sweat and tears by their ancestors?

But Churchill threw it all away because he wanted to be a war leader.

It was he who frittered away the inheritance of the British people.

When people like John Tyndall (who founded the BNP) complained with words to the effect after the war that Britain lost her empire for ignoble reasons and only gained the ignoble rewards of liberal decadence ie feminism, sexual licence, the emasculation and the disgusting feminisation of the white man and the uncontrolled immigration that would change the character of this nation forever, he was branded a Nazi and discredited by the liberal media.

After WW2 and after the loss of its empire, Britain could only comfort itself with the welfare state and the soft sweet luxuries of sexual liberation and easy divorce. But what did the welfare state that supported feminism and sexual licence do to the British ultimately?

The welfare state led to family breakdown, single parenthood, widespread illegitimacy, fatherlessness, ever lowering standards of education and morality, the worship of Mammon in the form of our sex and shopping society.

In short, the welfare state fueled by rampant consumerism created a culture of irresponsible borrowing and lending by government and individuals, the boom-bust cycle, all of which eventually led to the credit crunch affecting the entire Western world, who are now economically, morally bankrupt and heartily despised.

Perhaps it was ordained for the British to suffer the presence of Muslims, and to watch the people they regarded as a brown inferior race with a primitive religion surpass them in numbers, wealth and achievement in such a short space of time.

In the recent riots of England, whites joined in with the blacks to loot the shops of the browns, who are mostly the people these days who do any real business and who have property to protect.

It just shows you the strength and superiority of those who practise family values supported by marriage, compared to those once racially superior white affluent liberal atheists who thought they were above that sort of thing, but who are now effeminate reptiles and dogs, without honour and without shame, degraded and utterly contemptible in their cowardice and hypocrisy both in their domestic and foreign policy.

Imagine the kind of people who think the rest of the world is stupid enough to believe that they are invading another country for the good that country!   Their own people may be stupid enough to believe that, but it is sheer ignorance and arrogance to think others not subject to the British education system would be quite so susceptible to this sort of liberal claptrap.

Staggering, they will soon fall down on the pavement dead drunk, but not after vomiting and involuntarily defecating in the manner of drunks who really have had too much to drink, after all the partying they have had.  The rest of the world waits patiently, ready to kick their head in when this happens.

The lower the morals of women, the lower the morals of men.  And the morals of white working class slut, slag and slapper is very low indeed as they necessarily must be to have so many variously-fathered illegitimate children at the expense of the taxpayer in Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland.

Around half the children born in Britain are now born out of wedlock.

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23427447-more-than-half-of-all-british-babies-are-born-out-of-marriage.do

Think of how low the morals of the male political establishment must be, if they are afraid to criticise these sluts, slags and slappers who have variously-fathered bastards at the expense of the taxpayer.  It is no surprise that they do the things they now do in the world.  One can only hope that China and Russia eventually work up the courage to stop these fools and knaves in their tracks, with one neatly planted sucker punch, for the sake of world peace and to put an end to the toxic ideology of liberalism, which has delighted us for quite long enough.