Translate

Showing posts with label EU referendum. Show all posts
Showing posts with label EU referendum. Show all posts

Saturday, 2 July 2016

Which Tory leadership candidate and future Prime Minister possesses most of these Roman virtues?

Auctoritas — "Spiritual Authority" — The sense of one's social standing, built up through experience, Pietas, and Industria.

Comitas — "Humour" — Ease of manner, courtesy, openness, and friendliness.

Constantia — "Perseverance" — Military stamina, mental and physical endurance.

Clementia — "Mercy" — Mildness and gentleness.

Dignitas — "Dignity" — A sense of self-worth, personal pride.

Disciplina — "Discipline" — Military oath under Roman protective law & citizenship.

Firmitas — "Tenacity" — Strength of mind, the ability to stick to one's purpose.

Frugalitas — "Frugality" — Economy and simplicity of style, without being miserly.

Gravitas — "Gravity" — A sense of the importance of the matter at hand, responsibility and earnestness.

Honestas — "Respectability" — The image that one presents as a respectable member of society.

Humanitas — "Humanity" — Refinement, civilization, learning, and being cultured.

Industria — "Industriousness" — Hard work.

Iustitia — "Justice" — Sense of moral worth to an action.

Pietas — "Dutifulness" — More than religious piety; a respect for the natural order socially,
politically, and religiously. Includes the ideas of patriotism and devotion to others.

Prudentia — "Prudence" — Foresight, wisdom, and personal discretion.

Salubritas — "Wholesomeness" — Health and cleanliness.

Severitas — "Sternness" — Gravity, self-control.

Veritas — "Truthfulness" — Honesty in dealing with others.

Virtus - "Manliness" - Valor, excellence, courage, character, and worth. Vir meaning "man".



It's unlikely to be Leadsom.

It can't be Crabb.

It f [ill in the blank] be Fox.

It mustn't be May.

It's got to be Gove.
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, 29 June 2016

Which Tory leadership candidate should UKIP support?















at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Thursday, 23 June 2016

The story behind how I came to acquire this remain sticker

I went early to the polling station and there was a queue of workers. Not having a proper job, I felt guilty for adding to the queue and perhaps making them late for work. Indeed, I even considered going away and coming back again, but held firm to soak up the atmosphere. On my way out I saw someone I knew in the queue and we joked about doing our civic duty. Of course I wondered how he would be voting, and wondered how I would go about finding out without hanging around outside the polling station waiting to accost him as he came out. I decided to go to Tesco to see what cheapo items they had at this time of day. On the way there were men offering these stickers to me. I cheerfully declined and went on my way to Tesco. On my way back I decided to take one of these stickers then carried on my way home. To my delight, there was this local I knew chatting to another man in a rather conspiratorial way near the polling station. I went up to him and offered him my sticker jokingly, but he declined so we knew that we had both voted the way we would have wanted. "So, you were just winding them up!" he said. "Yes," I said conspiratorially, "They are so desperate they have resorted to getting the remainers to serve as propaganda vehicles for them." The chap he was talking to was also a leaver, so we three were very pleased with each other indeed. My best voting experience!






at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Wednesday, 22 June 2016

Genuine question: how do you think this woman voted in the EU referendum?

at No comments:
Labels: ,

Sunday, 19 June 2016

Remainders have capitalised on the death of Jo Cox, leavers can do so too

I suggest using the tactic of "Look what you made me do."

Jo Cox and her ilk would not have hesitated to call anyone who dared complain about immigration a racist. That was always how polarised the debate has been. How long has the immigration debate has been simmering? I would say since Powell made his Rivers of Blood speech in 20 April 1968. The killing of Cox on 16 June 2016 represented the multicultural and multiracial melting pot boiling over. Of course, there have been inner city riots since 1968, but this is the first time an MP actually suffered directly as a result of ignoring the concerns of voters.

Apparently, Breivik murdering 69 summer campers wasn't sufficient warning in 2011 because no politicians were harmed, only the youth members of the Workers' Youth League. This should have been taken as a warning to anyone who has ever thought they could just carry on denouncing anyone who ever dares to complain as racist dinosaurs to shut them up, but still they carried on employing that tactic.


Mr Cox’s wife, Jo, is a Labour MP and former aide to Mr Brown’s wife Sarah. Mrs Cox also runs the Labour Women’s Network where she is ‘equalities and discrimination’ adviser.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3298572/New-charity-scandal-Save-Children-executive-quits-women-s-complaints-inappropriate-behaviour.html#ixzz4C3OIalmv

An imaginary conversation between a recipient of Save the Children charity and its former CEO Justin Forsyth

It was probably Jo Cox who put it into Gordon Brown's head to call anyone who dared complain about immigration "bigoted", as he called called Mrs Gillian Duffy, a Labour member.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2010/apr/28/gordon-brown-gillian-duffy-transcript

Her plea for her constituents to vote remain still has no solutions or words of comfort whatsoever. It is still "Put up and shut up, you plebs. They will keep coming whether you like it or not, whether we're in or out. You have no choice, and you know it. Now shut it."

http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/opinion/jo-cox-brexit-is-no-answer-to-real-concerns-on-immigration-1-7956822#ixzz4BA42bFd8http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/opinion/jo-cox-brexit-is-no-answer-to-real-concerns-on-immigration-1-7956822

Just like IRA terrorism, politicians only responded when they perceived themselves to be directly threatened eg after the Brighton Bomb in 1984. When was the Anglo-Irish Agreement signed? 1985.

Leavers should point this out rather than be intimidated into silence and pulling their punches. Whatever the result, there's going to be trouble anyway.

It is time for the British to gird their loins, grit their teeth and bite the bullet.
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Saturday, 18 June 2016

Surely this man could not possibly have induced Tommy Mair to murder Jo Cox?


former National Front member Alan Harvey who  now runs a blog called Springbok Cyber Newsletter











http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jo-cox-shooting-suspect-quiet-8212246

at 9 comments:
Labels: , , ,

Monday, 23 May 2016

Have the frighteners been put on the Mail as well as the Telegraph on Brexit? What are Lady Rothermere's views?

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/mar/31/paul-dacre-eu-subsidies-hypocrisy-daily-mail-euro-lies

http://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/mar/30/daily-mail-editor-paul-dacre-received-88000-eu-subsidies-2014

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3602912/MAIL-SUNDAY-COMMENT-Brexiteers-logic-begins-crumble.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/eu_referendum/index.html More than a hint of anti-Brexitism in the Mail?

http://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/mar/16/rupert-murdoch-sun-brexit-eu-referendum-trevor-kavanagh

http://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/mar/16/rupert-murdoch-sun-brexit-eu-referendum-trevor-kavanagh

Along with the rest of the developed world – characterized by Generation Me, the Selfie, and a three-second attention span – the British have little hope of resisting the process of being managed into doing the right thing. And the right thing, in this case, is: voting to remain in a system wherein none of their votes will ever change anything ever again. 

https://www.rt.com/op-edge/344004-propaganda-techniques-uk-brexit/

What are Lady Rothermere's views on Brexit?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Harmsworth,_4th_Viscount_Rothermere 
at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Why is the Daily Telegraph sitting on the EU referendum fence?

at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Friday, 13 May 2016

Fear and loathing being expressed about London's first Muslim Mayor






http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/05/10/harvard-prof-urges-liberals-treat-evangelical-christians-like-nazis/



at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, 2 February 2016

Female vote will decide the outcome of the EU Referendum and more of them will vote to stay

0810

The president of the European Council Donald Tusk will today put forward a draft text to renegotiate the UK’s membership of the EU. Katya Adler is the BBC’s Europe Editor, Laura Kuenssberg is the BBC’s Political Editor and Dr Gyorgy Schopflin is MEP from the Hungarian governing party Fidesz.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b070drln

From 2:15

Laura Kuennsberg:

... The crucial people will be those in the middle. By Number Ten's calculation there is a chunk of people on one side maybe as many as 40% who are always going to vote to leave the EU and maybe between 30 or 40% on the other side of people who will always vote to stay. What will make the difference when it comes to the referendum is the 20 or 30% of the people - said to be the mushy middle - who will have to be convinced, and those will be the votes who will actually make the difference.

Apparently, 1/3 has already decided YES, 1/3 has already decided NO, and 1/3 are undecided. I bet it is the women who are undecided ending up voting for the UK to stay in because women are risk-averse, can't be bothered to understand how the EU operates or the principle of national sovereignty. Even if they did they are basically as unprincipled as unprincipled men who are easily frightened. People who stand firm against scare stories are people who believe in the principle of national sovereignty. The only way to frighten the undecided into voting to leave is to use migrant swarms to scare them, but it seems many European women want migrant swarms to come so they can work in refugee centres to be with them and can get their mangina running dogs to support them doing so.


Mangina running dogs of feminazis who will perform any act of masculine self-abnegation if called upon to do so. Europe's invaders will know what to do to them when they arrive. 




Nigel Farage and the effeminate and emasculated leave campaigners will be too afraid of alienating the female vote to call feminism out, so we will probably end up having to stay in. Sad, innit?



Europe’s Tragedy: Most Of Its Men Are Feminized Wimps

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/feminism-causes-immigration.html

Female judge grants asylum to Sudanenese migrant Abdul Rahman Haroun, 3 women greet him at prison gates

Simon Sheppard's Sex and Power and migrant swarms

Female BBC journalists' pro-migrant coverage

Ten Reasons Why Females Prefer Alien Males
Why women mind immigration much much less than men

http://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/6876/how-should-i-understand-the-word-corruption-in-this-passage-of-the-bhagavad-gita

It may be argued, of course, that all the major religions are fundamentally patriarchal since they came into being at historical periods distant from our own when human survival was predicated on a strict division of male and female realms. As the hero Arjuna tells the God Krishna in the Baghavad Gita,

‘In overwhelming chaos, Krishna

Women of the family are corrupted,

And when women are corrupted,

Disorder is born in society’

What is more despicable and contemptible than men who are corrupted by and weaker than their corrupted and weak women?

White feminists REPULSED by anti-immigration white proletariat and DON'T CARE what happens to them
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , ,

Monday, 19 October 2015

The admin of the Facebook page of UKIP Local and me




https://www.facebook.com/ukiplocal?fref=nf

Claire Khaw

Are you sure it is a good idea to use a dead white male in the leave campaign?

UKIP Local

Why does it make the message any less true?

Claire Khaw

You think a message being borne by the dead or elderly and dying men will have any resonance with the voters of the 21st century who do not already agree with you? It just reveals the cluelessness of the leave campaign.
May I know when this video was made? Last century?

These comments have been deleted and I have been predictably disabled from posting by some elderly Facebook poster. These old codgers and crones can't take any criticism at all.

at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Saturday, 3 October 2015

My exchange with Robert Oulds of the Bruges Group on the EU referendum


Our exchange on 23 September 2015

CK at 1316:

3000 in migrant camps in Calais more than double what you said ie 1000. When the numbers become intolerable French will help them onto boats sending them here. 

RO at 1324:

You need to think a bit more. If the French were sending them over the camp would not be there.


CK to 1325:

Perception is all. Opportunity missed if leave campaign don't equate leaving EU with end of migrant swarms. It was you who said 1000 in Calais Monday evening. 


RO at 1326:

What you say is wrong and misses the facts.


RO at 1326:

You need to learn about the Le Touquet Treaty


[Then Robert Oulds rang and shouted at me calling me a "stupid woman" several times and said it was "very odd" that I, who was not born in this country, should be concerned about immigration, implying that no one who is not white has a right to criticise government policy even if they are UK citizens. It is not the implied and unstated racism that bothered me, just why he felt he had to say this and the way he said this that I found socially inept. He then desisted from calling me a "stupid woman", probably fearing accusations of sexism and started calling me a "stupid person" instead.]


CK at 1343:

"You need to learn about the Le Touquet Treaty" - is this how you are going to persuade friends and family and also calling them stupid?? They would do the opposite of what you say if you shout at them and call them stupid. 


RO at 1345:

Sorry. You cannot be rational if you say Nigel Farage isn't doing enough on immigration! 


CK at 1346:

Farage could be attacking the clearly biased pro-migrant coverage of the BBC and other Western media and proposing to abolish licence fee and sell off BBC. 



CK at 1348:

Is Farage even saying what I say he should be saying? Has anyone suggested you do a bit of anger management?



CK at 1350:

Voters hate anti-immigration people cos they are full of anger, arrogance who are invariably social retards and crusty old men. THAT IS THE PROBLEM.



RO at 1352:

I am anti-immigration. I just found you annoying and irrational. 


CK at 1352:

I am telling you why the young hate the sight and sound of crusty hate-filled old men who can't use social media telling them what to do.



CK at 1355:

How have I been irrational by telling you lot you have an image problem??! You clearly do, of being crusty racists who will soon be dead, that's what they say.


CK at 1356:

You can't take any criticism either. 

Did you get any of this? Whom do you believe?
at 12 comments:
Labels: , , ,

Friday, 2 October 2015

Do you know the answer to the questions I have asked Arron Banks?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/eureferendum/11904688/Nigel-Farage-could-consider-quitting-Ukip-to-lead-Britain-out-of-Europe-says-major-Ukip-donor.html



at 1 comment:
Labels: , , , , ,

Sunday, 13 September 2015

How the THREE OPTIONS in the EU Referendum should be framed

The voter should be given THREE options viz

1) Leave the EU and NATO and have socially conservative policies, low taxes and small government

2) Leave the EU and NATO and have a socialist state

3) Stay in the EU and trust in the Conservative Party to win GE 2020
at No comments:
Labels: ,

Saturday, 20 June 2015

Was Nigel Farage thinking of Claire Khaw when he said this?

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/ukips-deputy-chair-suzanne-evans-sacked-over-comments-about-nigel-farage-10330278.html

Mr Farage has said he is "prepared" to lead the No campaign in the EU referendum - but suspects the role will go to a figure from "outside normal politics".

Claire Khaw in the Reading Room at the Wellcome Trust

Claire Khaw - definitely "outside normal politics" ...
at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Wednesday, 21 May 2014

What Nigel Farage should do to get a UKIP *LANDSLIDE* in GE 2015

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/oct/25/mp-voted-for-eu-referendum


  1. Invite MPs who voted for an EU referendum to join UKIP.
  2. Promise a leadership election ASAP.
  3. Fight GE 2015 with as many of the MPs above.

This really would transform the British political landscape.  

The best case scenario is all 111 of them joining UKIP, but even getting fewer than half of them to jump ship would still be enough to scare the LibLabCon shitless.  

They can only be persuaded to join if they know they have a sporting chance at the leadership and the rules will not be rigged against them.  

To tempt them they shall also be offered rights similar to those given to members of the Chinese Communist Party, which are to DIE FOR, as far as a member of a UK political party is concerned. They should all know that they have no rights to speak of anyway. 



Article 4. Party members enjoy the following rights:

1) To attend relevant Party meetings, read relevant Party documents, and benefit from the Party's education and training.

2) To participate in the discussion of questions concerning the Party's policies at Party meetings and in Party newspapers and journals.

3) To make suggestions and proposals regarding the work of the Party.

4) To make well-grounded criticism of any Party organization or member at Party meetings, to present information or charges against any Party organization or member concerning violations of discipline or the law to the Party in a responsible way, to demand disciplinary measures against such a member, or call for dismissal or replacement of any incompetent cadre.

5) To participate in voting and elections and to stand for election.

6) To attend, with the right of self-defense, discussions held by Party organizations to decide on disciplinary measures to be taken against themselves or to appraise their work and behavior; other Party members may also bear witness or argue on their behalf.

7) In case of disagreement with a Party resolution or policy, to make reservations and present their views to Party organizations at higher levels even up to the Central Committee, provided that they resolutely carry out the resolution or policy while it is in force.

8) To put forward any request, appeal, or complaint to higher Party organizations even up to the Central Committee and ask the organizations concerned for a responsible reply.

No Party organization, up to and including the Central Committee, has the right to deprive any Party member of the above-mentioned rights.

It is proposed that members shall have access to Independent Arbitrators if there is any dispute as to the fairness of any internal party disciplinary hearing.  I am very happy to offer myself as their first port of call, known as I am for my judicious impartiality.


What I also propose is that those who want to be leader throw their hats in the ring and vote for a leader using rules similar the Papal Conclave.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_conclave

Sorted!

at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, 13 April 2014

Political strategist explains how 81 Tory MPs can neutralise UKIP in GE 2015 while shifting Britain sharply to the right

http://s477308942.websitehome.co.uk/parliament/2011/10/the-79-conservative-mps-who-voted-for-a-referendum.html

If these Tory MPs really want an EU referendum, they know which party they should really be in: UKIP.

These Tory MPs who want an EU referendum probably also want to repeal the Equality Act 2010 and abolish gay marriage.

What can they do to punish David Cameron?

Why, threaten to defect to UKIP if he does not agree to propose repealing the Equality Act 2010 in the Conservative Party manifesto for GE 2015, of course.

He would be utterly destroyed if even just half of them did that.

Once the Tories promise to repeal the Equality Act 2010, the legs of UKIP will be completely cut away from under them.  This will be an excellent way to punish Nigel Farage for his cowardice and the way he treated Donna Edmunds.  http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/mar/05/ukip-councillor-donna-edmunds-women-gay-people

What's there not to like about this idea?  We would get a landslide Conservative victory, dispense with the Coalition, and allow UKIP supporters to get what they want without even having to wait for their pathetic little party to win a few miserable seasts.

It can be done, it must be done, it will be done!


  1. Stuart Andrew (Pudsey)
  2. Steve Baker (Wycombe)
  3. John Baron (Basildon and Billericay)
  4. Andrew Bingham (High Peak)
  5. Brian Binley (Northampton South)
  6. Bob Blackman (Harrow East)
  7. Peter Bone (Wellingborough)*
  8. Graham Brady (Altrincham and Sale West)
  9. Andrew Bridgen (Leicestershire NW)
  10. Steve Brine (Winchester)
  11. Fiona Bruce (Congleton)
  12. Dan Byles (Warwickshire North)
  13. Douglas Carswell (Clacton)
  14. Bill Cash (Stone)
  15. Chris Chope (Christchurch)
  16. James Clappison (Hertsmere)
  17. Tracey Crouch (Chatham and Aylesford)
  18. David T C Davies (Monmouth)
  19. Philip Davies (Shipley)
  20. David Davis (Haltemprice & Howden)
  21. Nick de Bois (Enfield North)
  22. Caroline Dinenage (Gosport)
  23. Nadine Dorries (Bedfordshire Mid)
  24. Richard Drax (Dorset South)
  25. Mark Field (Cities of London and Westminster)
  26. Lorraine Fullbrook (South Ribble)
  27. Zac Goldsmith (Richmond Park)
  28. James Gray (Wiltshire North)
  29. Chris Heaton-Harris (Daventry)
  30. Gordon Henderson (Sittingbourne & Sheppey)
  31. George Hollingbery (Meon Valley)
  32. Philip Hollobone (Kettering)*
  33. Adam Holloway (Gravesham)
  34. Stewart Jackson (Peterborough)
  35. Bernard Jenkin (Harwich and Essex N)
  36. Marcus Jones (Nuneaton)
  37. Chris Kelly (Dudley South)
  38. Andrea Leadsom (Northamptonshire S)
  39. Jeremy Lefroy (Stafford)
  40. Edward Leigh (Gainsborough)
  41. Julian Lewis (New Forest East)
  42. Karen Lumley (Redditch)
  43. Jason McCartney (Colne Valley)
  44. Karl McCartney (Lincoln)
  45. Stephen McPartland (Stevenage)
  46. Anne Main (St Albans)
  47. Patrick Mercer (Newark)
  48. Nigel Mills (Amber Valley)
  49. Anne-Marie Morris (Newton Abbot)
  50. James Morris (Halesowen and Rowley Regis)
  51. Stephen Mosley (Chester)
  52. Sheryll Murray (Cornwall SE)
  53. Caroline Nokes (Romsey and Southampton N)
  54. David Nuttall (Bury N)
  55. Matthew Offord (Hendon)
  56. Neil Parish (Tiverton and Honiton)
  57. Priti Patel (Witham)
  58. Andrew Percy (Brigg and Goole)
  59. Mark Pritchard (The Wrekin)
  60. Mark Reckless (Rochester and Strood)
  61. John Redwood (Wokingham)
  62. Jacob Rees-Mogg (Somerset NE)
  63. Simon Reevell (Dewsbury)
  64. Laurence Robertson (Tewkesbury)
  65. Andrew Rosindell (Romford)
  66. Richard Shepherd (Aldridge-Brownhills)
  67. Henry Smith (Crawley)
  68. John Stevenson (Carlisle)
  69. Bob Stewart (Beckenham)
  70. Gary Streeter (Devon SW)
  71. Julian Sturdy (York Outer)
  72. Sir Peter Tapsell (Louth and Horncastle)
  73. Justin Tomlinson (Swindon N)
  74. Andrew Turner (Isle of Wight)
  75. Martin Vickers (Cleethorpes)
  76. Charles Walker (Broxbourne)
  77. Robin Walker (Worcester)
  78. Heather Wheeler (Derbyshire S)
  79. Craig Whittaker (Calder Valley)
  80. John Whittingdale (Maldon)
  81. Dr Sarah Wollaston (Totnes)

I rather fancied the way Andrew Bridgen sent Annabelle Fuller away with a flea in her ear. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/woman-who-claimed-mp-andrew-137526  He would certainly be one of the leadership candidates after David Cameron has been asked to fall on his sword, so to speak and make a strong  case against any more stupid victims' laws.  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26917360

A few quiet words to him will make him leave politics for good, resigning his seat so there will be a by election which Dan Hannan will win ...


at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, 8 November 2013

Generation Identity by Markus Willinger: an indictment against the liberal establishment and the 68ers

You can order it at http://www.amazon.co.uk/product-reviews/1907166416/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1 where I have reviewed it.  It is reproduced below:


It is short, sweet and strong as well as a compelling read. I must say I relish the thought of liberals reading this book and quaking in their boots, for they cannot refute any of the accusations Willinger makes with facts or logic.

As for British identity (which is currently Dipso, Fatso, Bingo, Tesco, ASBO and Paedo), it will change for the better when the right laws are in place.

The right laws, as far as I am concerned anyway, will be in place after the following take place:

1. after the repeal of the Equality Act 2010
2. after the repeal of the European Communities Act 1972
3. after the repeal of Murder (Abolition of Death Penalty) Act 1975
4. after fault is taken into account in any divorce settlement
5. after a flat rate income tax of 20% is in place
6. after the welfare-dependent and low-waged are disenfranchised
7. after the civil partnership and inheritance tax is abolished
8. after the welfare state is dismantled
9. after the NHS is broken up and sold off
10. after it is again shameful to have a child out of wedlock

The right laws would be the laws that undermine the foundations of the West's entrenched matriarchy that have made its government and people so venal, irrational and immoral. It would not be difficult at all to entirely discredit feminism as a viable, moral or intellectually respectable ideology when our voices are loud enough.

Generation Identity significantly increases the volume.

For an explanation of 68ers, http://www.counter-currents.com/2013/07/markus-willingers-generation-identity/ does this quite well:

In May 1968, wildcat strikes across France initially sparked by student rebellions brought the entire nation of France to a standstill, with President de Gaulle going so far as to flee the country. The slogans of the ’68ers were a classic example of postmodern Marxism, a cry for a life more meaningful than what was possible under capitalist alienation. “A cop sleeps inside each one of us. We must kill him. Drive the cop out of your head.” “It is forbidden to forbid.” “Be realistic, ask the impossible.”

Though de Gaulle was able to defeat the would-be revolution, and his Center-Right party even gained seats in the elections that followed, May ’68 had a huge impact on European society, government, and culture. It heralded the establishment of Cultural Marxism [feminism, in other words] as the default culture of educated Western opinion. The rebellious young figures of the uprising, like the charismatic Daniel Marc Cohn-Bendit (aka “Danny the Red”), have gone on to become the boring old bureaucrats of the European Parliament, lecturing the people of Europe on what products they are allowed to use, what they are allowed to say, and what they are allowed to think. Instead of the beginning of a new era of freedom, May ’68 was the beginning of what Keith Preston has called “Totalitarian Humanism.”



at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Monday, 7 October 2013

Draft Statement for Nick Griffin on Adam Afriyie's amendment to the EU referendum bill

"Adam Afriyie's proposal to table an amendment to the EU referendum bill was publicised late Saturday 5 October.  It is now Monday 7 October and I apologise for the delay in expressing a view on this, but this was a matter that required deep soul-searching.  We all know, of course, that if Afriyie succeeded and the country proceeded to have a referendum on 23 October 2014 as he proposed, there would be no reason for UKIP to exist by the time the 2015 General Election came round.

This would leave the anti-immigration field entirely clear to the BNP.  He has clearly done us in the BNP a great favour and it is our intention to support him in every way we can.

While those who call us a racist party would be astonished at our preparedness to support what many in the Conservative Party and UKIP would describe as an "uppity n*gger", it is precisely my intention to show that the BNP can rise above petty considerations of race and party.

Any Eurosceptic Tory and Labour MP who does not support his amendment will be put on the BNP hit list for GE 2015.  Indeed, it is my intention to do a deal with the UKIP so that we do not stand against each other in constituencies in which one of us is obviously more likely to do better than the other, in order to inflict maximum damage on the hypocrites, cowards, careerists and racists of the Tory Party.

The BNP congratulates Adam Afriyie on his bold and strategic move, and wishes him every success."



http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/draft-statement-for-nigel-farage-on.html
Draft Statement for Nigel Farage
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Draft Statement for Nigel Farage on Adam Afriyie's amendment to the EU referendum bill

"Adam Afriyie's proposal to table an amendment to the EU referendum bill was publicised late Saturday 5 October.  It is now Monday 7 October and I apologise for the delay in expressing a view on this, but this was a matter that required deep soul-searching.  We all know, of course, that if Afriyie succeeded and the country proceeded to have a referendum on 23 October 2014 as he proposed, there would be no reason for UKIP to exist by the time the 2015 General Election came round.  There is also understandably some reluctance from UKIP members who feel the existence of their party to be threatened by someone they regard as uppity n*gger to support this same uppity n*gger.  There are those in UKIP who would ignore Afriyie and who are in favour of waiting for him to fail.

As leader of UKIP, it is incumbent on me to show moral leadership on this matter.

It has been said by Nationalist Philosopher Claire Khaw:

"If it should be done then it must be done, if it must be done then it must be done as soon as possible."

There is no flaw in this reasoning that I can honestly find, and we would be fools to believe Cameron's promise that he would hold one in 2017 if he were still Prime Minister.  A week in politics is already a long time and for us in 2013 to wait until 2017 is the political equivalent of waiting upon a contingency for an eternity.

The Cause is always always more important than the political tribe that claims to support it.  If Afriyie alone in all the Conservative Party is capable of proposing an EU referendum sooner rather than later, then he should and must have the support of UKIP.

Any Eurosceptic Tory and Labour MP who does not support his amendment will be put on the UKIP hit list for GE 2015.  Indeed, it is my intention to do a deal with the BNP so that we do not stand against each other in constituencies in which one of us is obviously more likely to do better than the other, in order to inflict maximum damage on the hypocrites, cowards, careerists and racists of the Tory Party.

UKIP congratulates Adam Afriyie on his bold and strategic move, and wishes him every success."


http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/draft-statement-for-nick-griffin-on.html
Draft Statement for Nick Griffin
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

Claire Khaw complimented as being "very Protestant" by Calvinist pastor Paul Vanderklay!

  CLAIRE KHAW does not see any prospect of Christians agreeing on the Doctrine of the Trinity and suggests that Americans at least should go...