Translate

Showing posts with label J4MB. Show all posts
Showing posts with label J4MB. Show all posts

Monday, 11 May 2015

Marginalised beta males complaining about feminazi oppression







Even the white man's most powerful religion - the Catholic Church - cannot save them now.



Even if Michael Voris - known for telling it like it is and laying it on the line, who is the alpha male of Catholicism and dubbed the Anjem Choudary of Catholicism - had been made Pope the same time Pope Francis was made Pope, it would still be too late.






My review of Simon Sheppard's Sex and Power: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sex-Power-Manual-Male-Female-Relations/dp/190124024X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1377715983&sr=8-1&keywords=simon+sheppard+sex+and+power 

at 2 comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, 21 March 2015

More bright ideas for Mike Buchanan's antifeminist party to give his lacklustre campaign polish

Two  dull middle-aged women slumped in a sofa in dull voices and a dull middle-aged man is not going to set the world on fire against feminism. I have a few ideas below about how to attract more publicity.



at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, 18 March 2015

Beta males like Mike Buchanan cannot win the fight against feminism


How many middle-aged men need HRT?


at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, 17 March 2015

Claire Khaw's election strategy for Mike Buchanan and J4MB



at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Sunday, 15 March 2015

Claire Khaw's Class and Gender Theory of Western Decline


  1. The moment men say it is in order for their women to be fornicating sluts they will become lower than sluts.
  2. Men are lower than sluts if they dare not criticise them.
  3. We know who is in power by those whom we dare not criticise.
  4. Even the US President dares not criticise sluts and he is supposed to be the world's most powerful man.  
  5. The current US President dares not criticise sluts because he knows Slut Single Mothers (SSMs) mostly vote Democrat. http://mediamatters.org/research/2007/10/04/coulter-if-we-took-away-womens-right-to-vote-we/140037
  6. The failure of the Republican candidate Mitt Romney to be elected US President was because female voters realised he was referring to them in his 47% comment. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitt_Romney_presidential_campaign,_2012#47.25_comment
  7. Mitt Romney either did not read or decided not to take on board the advice I gave him at http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/too-many-women-have-vote-and-solution.html
  8. The patriarchy runs on marriage the way cars run on petrol.
  9. Properly supporting marriage - not just paying lip service to it - means you have to forbid extramarital sex officially and unambiguously by say proposing that Slut Single Mothers be lashed 100 times per bastard. http://quran.com/24/2
  10. Proposing to lash Slut Single Mothers 100 times per bastard would of course make the Slut Single Mothers and their running dogs (MCSFs which are explained at http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/all-spossms-are-mcsfs-but-not-all-mcsfs.html) have fits of the vapours, and this is what Mike Buchanan, leader of the West's only antifeminist party is not prepared to do, because he is only a beta male, easily frightened. 
  11. Failing to practise marriage means that the matriarchy establishes itself by peopling your society with sluts and bastards, who will be genetically, morally, culturally and economically inferior to married couples and their legitimate offspring.  
  12. Feminism causes immigration because working mothers cause women to not have enough children, fail to parent them properly and probably deprive them of their fathers when they divorce their husbands. 
  13. Feminism causes paedophilia because single mothers neglect and/or abandon their offspring to care homes.
  14. A patriarchy is a society that condones male promiscuity.
  15. A matriarchy is a society that condones and even rewards female promiscuity.
  16. It is easier to be a matriarchy than a patriarchy because it is easier for men to let women fuck whoever they like in the name of sexual liberation hoping one of the men these sluts fancy fucking will be them than to say there should be enforceable rules about who they get knocked up by or see to it that these rules are enforced by law or social disapproval. 
  17. All patriarchies are advanced civilisations and all matriarchies are declining and primitive societies. It has been taboo to criticise the Slut Single Mother since 1974, as Keith Joseph discovered after he made his speech. http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/101830 The crisis of masculinity began in 1974 when a putative alpha male who did so - a Prime Minister in waiting no less - lost his position to a woman, Margaret Thatcher.
  18. If you are an attractive male with charisma and charm you would do OK in a  matriarchy because you would have worked out the unspoken rules and the sluts would be queuing up to suck your cock anyway. (Someone who has probably worked out the rules is Chuka Umunna, tipped to be the next Labour leader after Ed Miliband loses the next General Election.)
  19. The greatest victims of feminism are beta males whom women despise because they find them the opposite of attractive and charming. (This means they find them repulsive and intensely irritating as I am sure many feminists find Mike Buchanan.)
  20. In the days of the patriarchy women would have to settle for a beta male if they can't get themselves an alpha male but want legitimate offspring. (These days they say things like "A few minutes of alpha is better than a lifetime of beta.")
  21. A woman who settles for a beta male will always look upon him as a reminder of her failure when she perceives that he is not as clever, not as adventurous and not as attractive and wealthy as she would like him to be, or worse, perceives that he is not as clever and not as adventurous or wealthy as she is. (This is probably why beta males looking for wives prefer women to be stupider than they are and why Western men find dumb blonds so attractive. Blondness is a sign of childhood and immaturity, which is why emotionally and intellectually insecure men prefer to deal with women who are childlike and won't question them too much.) 
  22. In the days of the patriarchy a married woman would be regarded to have a higher status than a mere spinster.
  23. The current leader of the only antifeminist political party in the West is beta male Mike Buchanan.
  24. Beta males need the protection of alpha males, but there are no alpha males in the West any more because even the US President - the nominal alpha male of the West - is afraid of criticising sluts who have the vote. 
  25. Indeed, beta males cannot even choose their leader without the interference of women who have the vote. Why do women vote differently from men?
  26. As for the males with alpha qualities, they are doing fine and getting all the pussy they want. If they are even seen to be challenging feminism they would lose access to pussy as well as their status, and perhaps even their matrimonial home and their children, because wives can now divorce their husbands for no good reason at all under the rules of no fault divorce and get half their husband's property and pension. 
  27. What is the problem with Mike Buchanan being a beta male? No beta male will accept the authority of another beta male and Mike Buchanan cannot generate the charisma, charm, confidence and courage to be an alpha male because his personality and narrow outlook and intellect does not allow for the development of charisma, charm, confidence and courage. 
  28. Claire Khaw is female with alpha male qualities, which would be much more useful to antifeminists than a mere beta male like Mike Buchanan too afraid to even ask for what he needs and wants to re-establish the patriarchy.
  29. An alpha male would not feel threatened by me or my ideas and would find them useful, but beta male Mike Buchanan is too intellectually insecure to even discuss my ideas, let alone challenge them, because he already knows what I say is so obviously true and none of my claims can be challenged or undermined.  All he knows is that he must not be seen to be endorsing my views because he is terrified of alienating his female supporters. 
  30. Why do men of other cultures hate and fear the slut? Because they don't want to become like Western men in collective denial over their thraldom to the slut and unable to get out of the fix they are in because every exit out of the matriarchy is now blocked by sluts they are terrified of offending.
Chuka Umunna - a male with alpha qualities  heterosexual female members of the Labour Party will find irresistibly attractive and vote for after Ed Miliband loses the General Election on 7 May 2015. 

The Labour Party should record and publish the percentage of female party members who vote for him and the percentage of male party members who vote for him in the next Labour Party leadership election after Ed Miliband loses the election because he is just not sexy enough.


Mike Buchanan, beta male with the political party dedicated to challenging feminism too intellectually insecure to discuss my ideas or accept my help for his General Election campaign

Mike Buchanan the beta male in his beta male van
Mike Buchanan displays his beta male qualities in his beta male vehicle. 


Janusz Korwin-Mikke, outspoken leader of Poland’s Congress of the New Right.  Part of his distaste for modern Europe is driven by the position of women, who he says have replaced “privileges” with “equal rights”, a phrase Korwin-Mikke spat out as if it was an insult. Most want to stay at home to raise families, and can’t be trusted to vote, said the twice-married father of six. They are also, he claims, “less tall, less heavy, less intelligent, on the average”. And he adds: “Women usually vote for the more handsome man.” http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/nov/08/nigel-farage-ukip-europe-janusz-korwin-mikke


at 2 comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Friday, 13 March 2015

Mike Buchanan's virile antifeminist blue van can do 140 mph on the motorway and overtake a Ferrari




From 5:55

Mike Buchanan is standing as Ashfield's first antifeminist prospective parliamentary candidate.

at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, 11 March 2015

Claire Khaw offers to stand as prospective parliamentary candidate for Mike Buchanan's antifeminist party




https://j4mb.wordpress.com/2014/11/10/2015-general-election-campaign-support-our-campaign-stand-as-a-candidate-for-j4mb-or-make-a-donation/

1.  Have you really offered to stand as prospective parliamentary candidate for Mike Buchanan's political party Justice For Men and Boys?

I have indeed.

2.  How likely do you think Mike Buchanan is to accept your offer to stand as prospective parliamentary candidate for his political party?

I would say 50/50. He could say yes, he could say no.

3.  Do you think Mike Buchanan is more likely to say YES or more likely to say NO to your becoming prospective parliamentary candidate for Justice for Men and Boys?

I really wouldn't like to say anything more beyond that than it is in theory 50/50.

4.  Why are you being so cagey about your prospects of being prospective parliamentary candidate for Mike Buchanan's antifeminist party?

Because beyond saying that it is in theory 50/50 it is pointless to speculate.

5.  Weren't you sneering at Mike Buchanan and his antifeminist party with the stupid long name not that long ago?

I have to put up my hands up to that but I now see that it could be an interesting experience and an opportunity to generate some publicity, if Mike Buchanan is prepared to accept my offer.

6.   Would you say you owe Mike Buchanan an apology?

For what exactly?

7.   Do you deny that you have been abusing Mike Buchanan?

I believe some of my remarks about him could be considered to be quite rude, yes, but then I am sure he has been rude about me too.

8.   Do you regret being rude about Mike Buchanan?

I was perfectly polite to him until he said I was a religious fanatic and refused to accept my denials. Did you expect me to shut up and forget about it all? I am fighter, not a quitter.

9.   Do you think Mike Buchanan fears that if he lets you stand as prospective parliamentary candidate you would become a member of his one-man party and if you became the other member of his one-man party you would take over as leader?

I don't see what the problem would be if I did take over, if I am indeed the better leader.

10.   How would people know whether you or Mike Buchanan is the better leader of antifeminism?

They won't know until they see us both in action and are in a position to make comparisons.

11.   If you were the one who established an antifeminist party, would you let someone like you join?

Of course, because the idea of a leadership contest would be newsworthy and generate much more interest in the party and antifeminism than just me going up and down the country moaning about feminism as sole leader and member of my party.

12.   Do you think Mike Buchanan might feel too threatened by you to let you stand as prospective parliamentary candidate for his antifeminist party?

It is possible that he may wish to protect his position at the expense of seizing the opportunity I present him with both hands to generate publicity. He may feel too insecure and risk-averse to have anything to do with me because he dislikes my ideas, but my proposed association and/or membership of Mike Buchanan's antifeminist party can only draw attention to the cause and generate interest, and I hope he is big enough to see that.

13.   What has Mike Buchanan to gain by letting you stand as prospective parliamentary candidate for his antifeminist party if you have already said you want to take over the party even before your proposal today? http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/mike-buchanan-should-surrender-his.html

He would be credited with having the grace and humility to stand aside for someone who is clearly a better leader and with advancing the cause of antifeminism.

14.   How will you be popularising the cause of antifeminism by being the prospective parliamentary candidate of Mike Buchanan's antifeminist party when people will know you want to forbid extramarital sex and lash SSMs 100 times per illegitimate offspring?

I won't be popularising antifeminism at all, just letting men know what they have to do to regain the status they used to have.

15.   Do you not think that you would make people less likely to vote for Mike Buchanan's antifeminist party if you are its prospective parliamentary candidate and also known for wanting to establish a one-party theocracy in Britain as well as inflicting 100 lashes on people who have had extramarital sex?

I think he already accepts that he is not going to be the next MP for Ashfield, Nottingham. Indeed, he said the purpose of standing was to draw attention to the male victims of feminism. It is necessary for people to realise how deeply entrenched the matriarchy now is. Getting this message out is much more important than a few miserable votes that are not going to get anyone elected anyway.

16.   Why would Mike Buchanan allow you to join and stand as prospective parliamentary candidate for his antifeminist party if having you as a member and PPC would only make something already unpopular even more unpopular?

Because gaining popularity and votes is not the idea, getting the message punched through is.

17.   Do you really think Mike Buchanan wants to be associated with someone who wants to introduce sharia law in Britain and to inflict 100 lashes on anyone convicted of extramarital sex amongst your many many objectionable and detestable proposals?

That would certainly kick-start a discussion about what is necessary to re-establish the patriarchy and defenestrate the matriarchy, wouldn't it?

18.   Do you think male voters would want to give up extramarital sex in order to regain the former status they had in pre-feminist times?

They probably won't if you put it to them like that. Even if they are not persuaded at all, it should at least be put to them that forbidding extramarital sex is what they must do should they ever want to regain the status they used to have.

19.   So you are saying to an already unpopular man like Mike Buchanan that he should associate with you and become EVEN MORE UNPOPULAR?

He wouldn't be associating with me for the purpose of becoming even more unpopular, but for the purpose of punching the message through when so many people are wilfully deaf and blind.

If he cares about the transmission of the antifeminist message then there is only one correct answer.

If, however, what he wants to do is to TRY to be popular and pretend truly radical changes in our laws and social attitudes are not really required, then he really might as well not bother.

20.  What would you say is the difference between you and Mike Buchanan?

I am a visionary and he is a plodder.

21.   Will you continue to be dismissive of Mike Buchanan as you have been at http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/126895480449 if he lets you join his party and allows you to become a prospective parliamentary candidate?

Of course not. I would be civility, co-operation, charm, sugar, spice and all thing nice.

22.  So you are saying you would be singing Mike Buchanan's praises if he allows you to be prospective parliamentary candidate for his antifeminist party after you have been so rude about him. Aren't you being enormously insincere?

There is nothing insincere about refraining from criticising him in public.

23.   Wouldn't Mike Buchanan be a laughing stock if he allowed you to become prospective parliamentary candidate for his antifeminist party after you have been so rude about him?

I could easily draft out a joint statement that would make everything all right between us.

24.   Would you like to give us the gist of the joint statement you had in mind that would allow you and Mike Buchanan to have a workable relationship being the only two members of his political party?

I am sure the other prospective parliamentary candidates are also be members. If I join and there is only one of me, he is not going to be exactly outnumbered by little old me.

The Joint Statement I had in mind would be along the lines below:

"Mike Buchanan and Claire Khaw have resolved to bury the hatchet and work together in the run-up to the 2015 General Election despite known public disagreements in the past. Although they are not in agreement on antifeminism ideologically, tactically and strategically, it has been decided that at this very early stage of our challenge to feminism that no harm can be caused by actively airing them and having a full and frank exchange of ideas as a way of drawing the public into this very important debate."

25.   Have you converted to Islam?

To convert to Islam would invalidate Secular Koranism and I have no intention of invalidating Secular Koranism - my biggest idea.

26.   Why have you been talking like a Muslim convert?

Have I? When and where?

27.    You talk like a Muslim at http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/126896417153. Do you disagree?

In this HYPOTHETICAL situation, I imagined what a Muslim getting married would want and he or she wouldn't want to undergo a ceremony not recognised by the law of the land nor nor would anyone else who seriously wants to get married. Why go through a ceremony of marriage with no legal validity and end up having illegitimate offspring??

28.   You did not deny you were proposing Sharia law for Britain at http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/126894845057, did you?

No, I did not, because Secular Koranism is based on the Koran - which I cannot deny - and is technically a form of Sharia Law, just one that has a different interpretation to theirs.

29.   Apart from not stoning adulterers to death and throwing homosexuals off tall buildings, what else is ideologically distinct about Secular Koranism to the kind of Sharia Law we all know and hate?

I am so delighted that you asked the question!!

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2010/07/muslims-once-prayed-in-direction-of.html would change the place of pilgrimage every 4 years like the World Cup and the Olympics and piss off the Saudis big time.

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2010/06/my-interpretation-of-that-wife-beating.html mentions wife-beating witnessing ceremonies that will only end in a slap on the wrist instead of an arrest for domestic violence.

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2008/06/male-priests-civil-partnership-blessed.html discusses sharia-compliant threesomes and mini-orgies with your wives

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/feminists-want-prostitutes-dead-while.html says brothels would be legal under all governments run on the principles of Secular Koranism.

Finally, Secular Koranism is not a belief system but a LEGAL SYSTEM which can be administered by a non-Muslim judiciary after they have passed an exam in Koranic Knowledge, of course. It is just like being a Eurosceptic lawyer who specialises in EU law. You just have to know the system and its rules, not necessarily approve of it.

All you have to do to support Secular Koranism is be a social conservative. You can be a Jewish supporter of Secular Koranism, a Christian supporter of Secular Koranism and an agnostic, atheist and polytheist support of it, as well as a Hindu and Buddhist supporter of Secular Koranism.

30.   Apart from Secular Koranism, are there any other ideas you have which might be useful for antifeminists?

There is the ethology in my Slut Theory of Western decline. It basically says that even the President of the United States is lower than sluts because most women in the West are sluts, a significant proportion of mothers are SSMs/Slut Single Mothers (who are a cancer of society) and they all have the vote.

Mike Buchanan is probably shy of saying this, but then he is a beta male.

Actually, in a matriarchy all men are lower than omega females AKA Slut Single Mothers because all men are afraid to criticise them.

Keith Joseph - who was a Prime Minister in waiting - criticised them in 1974 http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/101830 and he never became Prime Minister. British men in politics have been TERRIFIED of criticising sluts for 41 years.

Only Claire Khaw dares to call a spade a spade and a slut a slut.

A properly ordered society would have an alpha male leader (with an alpha female who is his partner) and beneath him would be beta males (and their beta female partners) and beneath them would be the omega female (the Slut Single Mother who is the least desirable female partner for a male if he is looking for a wife and mother for his children).

In a matriarchy all this is inverted with the worst of women squatting over all men in society abusing the power they have got stupid men to give them. Time to tell feminism to fuck off GOOD, HARD AND LOUD.

Re-establishment of Patriarchy, End of Pornocracy.

This can be shortened to "ROP, EOP".

We can sell T-shirts and wrist bands for this too.

Oh, and to celebrate International Patriarchy Day on 3 August 2015. http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/the-first-international-patriarchy-day.html


To: Mike Buchanan
Sent: Thursday, 12 March 2015, 11:04
Subject: My formal offer to assist you in your General Election campaign
          http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/claire-khaw-offers-to-stand-as.html
Hi Mike
I thought I would let you know that I am serious about this proposal and await your response.
Regards
Claire Khaw





at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...