Mark Collett's alleged Jewish heritage

Does Mark Collett - former BNP member infamous for his controversial views on Jews - have Jewish heritage while being unaware of it? Years ago, I pointed out to Mark that he did look as if he could be Jewish. Indeed, he looked so Jewish that I assumed that I was not the first person to point this out to him. He remained silent.

Rabbi Mizrachi himself admits that there are many people who think they are Jews but are not, and many people who think they are gentile but are in fact Jews. One could end up being a self-hating Jew. Self-loathing has long been regarded as a sign of mental illness and a feature of living in the early 21st century West is its ever rising levels of mental illness.

Is the West capable of correcting itself before it ends up gouging out its own eyes in despair and self-loathing, as Oedipus did?
https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/o/the-oedipus-trilogy/play-summary/oedipus-the-king

The tragedy of Oedipus Rex is about a man who didn't know his parents. He ended up murdering his father in a road rage incident and having sex with a cougar that turned out to be his mother.

If we didn't know who our parents are, we could end up committing incest with our sibling, sugar daddy or cougar.

Isn't it already painfully obvious that condoning casual sex would inevitably lead to dysgenics and degeneracy?

Interestingly, it was the the late Jewish baronet Keith Joseph who pointed out to the British in 1974 in his Edgbaston speech that they were destroying their "human stock" by condoning unmarried parenthood. He paid dearly for pointing out the obvious when he found himself apologising for his speech. A man who was widely regarded as a Prime Minister in waiting found himself serving under Margaret Thatcher, Britain's first female Prime Minister - the first milestone of matriarchy. Before Keith Joseph, it was Enoch Powell who destroyed his career by pointing out the obvious. Unlike Joseph, he did not apologise.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron

Why won't nationalists talk about marriage and family values instead of endlessly obsessing about Jews?

We know who we is in power by those we dare not criticise, and I don't mean the Jews. They now have a representative in Downing Street, sharing the bedroom of the British Prime Minister.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

Blue Labour thinking, with its emphasis on community-led solutions, is being touted as the party's version of the Big Society, and it's also possible that his emphasis on "family, faith and flag" will be a means of Labour outflanking the coalition on the right. The feminazis of the Labour Party destroyed his career.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/jul/19/lord-glasman-radical-traditionalist

The feminazis of the Labour Party Helen Goodman and Harriet Harman destroying Maurice Glasman's career
https://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2011/06/blue-labour-john-era-goodman

The repellent dishonesty of the antisemites and Islamophobes who refuse to give me a platform

Really makes you think... pic.twitter.com/FvXuJeBxY9

— Mark Collett (@MarkACollett) March 19, 2019

Perhaps this is really a fight between the religious against the irreligious. God if He exists would favour the former. For nationalists to get what they want they would have to restore the patriarchy, and the patriarchy can only be restored with marriage and family values. https://t.co/7mmxJfU4un

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 19, 2019

The clear blue water between feminists and nationalists against Jews and Muslims is that the former condone fornication and are dysgenic, while the latter practice marriage and family values which is eugenic. Whom would God favour if He exists? The answer is obvious.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 19, 2019

The least a religion should do for you is to ensure that most parents in your society are married parents. If Christianity can no longer do that, it is a clear sign that it should be taken out with the trash. https://t.co/DfyW07YtFs

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 19, 2019

"The result is that in Britain in 2012, 47.5 per cent of children were born outside marriage, expected to become a majority in 2016." Jews have warned heedless Christians over the years. https://t.co/3X7WmQH0mu No nationalist has expressed any concern over widespread bastardy.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 19, 2019

Jews over the years have stuck their necks out for the gentile, but this is never acknowledged by the antisemites who either cannot see it or refuse to acknowledge it. https://t.co/0UWhWXvq2d

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 19, 2019

Keith Joseph was another Jew who stuck his neck out over unmarried mothers. https://t.co/cqeGtzr8md Is there a single nationalist who has proposed the abolition of no fault divorce? They seem deliberately blind to the connection between bastardy and degeneracy.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 19, 2019

Nationalists do not seem aware of the bad impression angry low status, low education and low income bachelors who are obviously unmarriageable create. Worst of all, they are so intellectually dishonest they call me mad for raising the issue of widespread bastardy and degeneracy.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 19, 2019

Instead of discussing social, political and economic, low-courage nationalists prefer to dwell on their pet hatreds of Jews and Muslims. It seems agreeing with each other on how much they hate Jews, Muslims and non-whites is *the only thing* that binds them together.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 19, 2019

As if their low-courage tactic of only complaining and never proposing solutions were not bad enough, when solutions are suggested, they collectively conspire to suppress and ignore them. Not discussing my solutions has been the major nationalist preoccupation for a decade now.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 19, 2019

The moment British men show they are prepared to end the creation of widespread bastardy and show that they are men worth marrying, they will get their country back. However, it seems they are currently content to continue hating Jews, Muslims, non-whites and immigrants.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 19, 2019

@Theocracy4all: "I do want to shock and awe by talking about motherhood and apple pie and marriage and family values ..." https://t.co/qoyvQH6ROA

— (((Luke Ford))) (@lukeford) March 20, 2019

Who is the weakest link in the West - Western Man or Western Woman?

23:00  Claire Khaw is mentioned at The Weakest Link https://t.co/3UVaCJK9Bm

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 7, 2019

1:29:00  I was unceremoniously removed from this hangout before I managed to correct their ignorance in economics and point out the role of government in giving citizens sound money. Public spending is funded by creating money out of thin air and paper.  https://t.co/3UVaCJK9Bm

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 7, 2019

The weakest link is the one who fails to do his duty in the role he has been assigned.


The question of our respective roles falls to be decided so we know what we are supposed to do.  It is the role of men to defend patriarchal moral values if they desire to live in a patriarchy.


My definition of patriarchy is that it is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers who wish to properly parent their legitimate offspring.


My definition of matriarchy is that it is a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers with variously fathered illegitimate offspring indifferent to their parenting.


The advantage of living in a patriarchy for me is that men are respected and expected to govern. Its disadvantage is its lack of sexual freedom.


The advantage of living in a matriarchy for women is that women get to treated as equals with men and women enjoying sexual freedom.


The long term-thinker would favour the patriarchy, and the short-term thinker would favour the matriarchy.


Belief in the afterlife is the best example of long-term thinking, atheism incapable of thinking beyond the next sexual encounter or next election a short-term thinking. This is the difference between Ant civilisations and Grasshopper civilisations.


All advanced civilisations are patriarchies, and all primitive, declining, extinct and soon to be extinct societies are matriarchies.


The perfect patriarchy - 100% married parents


The perfect matriarchy - 100% unmarried parents


The major difference between humans and non-human animals is that the latter do not marry and have no capacity for abstract thought.


Ideals are an abstract noun and men have been known to die for ideals such as duty to one's tribe and nation.


Generally, men are known for their capacity for abstract thought, while women "reason" only with their feelings.


The most powerful idea conceivable is the Abrahamic God, and since He is already in existence as a concept, we might as well use Him to assist us in our politics and religion, rather than think we have all the time in the world to invent our own religion and rules when the sky is about to fall on our heads.


Patriarchy has a command structure resembling that of the military, which is a pyramid structure, with the general as the leader. In a patriarchy, the man with the best communication skills and the most charisma should rule, hopefully with wisdom and justice.  A patriarchy is a society whose beta males choose their alpha males.


Matriarchy has no command structure because of its assumption of egalitarianism. Who would be most powerful in such a society? The ones who most command our emotional responses by their youth and beauty, of course. Beauty does not last and youth is often foolish. A matriarchy is a society in which all men are lower in status than the unmarried mother.

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/2009/11/3-degrees-of-culpability-in-single.html

We know America is a matriarchy because no senior male politician has criticised the unmarried mother since ... ?


The last time the  unmarried mother was criticised with disastrous results for the career of a senior male Jewish politician in 1974.  https://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron


The West has been a matriarchy for around half a century and this means four generations of feckless fuckers. The preferences of the West are now geared towards these people and their mostly illegitimate offspring ie the degenerate.

https://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/2011/04/why-white-people-are-now-inferior-race.html

Who then is the weakest link? The weakest link is any man who will not acknowledge the truth, use logic or be guided by morality. The least a human ought to do is abide by these rules, whatever his religion or political views. The weakest link is therefore someone who refuses to acknowledge any of the above, which I believe satisfy the conditions of being true, logical and moral.

Britain has been a matriarchy for nearly half a century, therefore knife crime will take a generation to tackle

We live in a matriarchy, and all men in a matriarchy are lower in status to the unmarried mother. The late Keith Joseph discovered this to his cost in 1974 after his Edgbaston speech warning the British that their "human stock" is threatened by unmarried mothers who casually conceive their offspring, casually parent them and casually abandon them to become the victims of child abusers and sex predators, who later become sex predators, child abusers and criminals.

Howard Flight echoes Keith Joseph's 1974 warning that 'our human stock is threatened'

The precipitous rise in knife crime in Britain which the Mayor of London Sadiq Khan said would take ten years to address is but an inkling of the chaos, criminality and disorder that is to come if this problem remains unchecked.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1040967/Sadiq-Khan-BBC-Today-John-Humphrys-knife-crime-stabbings-fatal-London-police-cuts

Too bad our politicians show no signs of even beginning to address this problem.

Most British people condone bastardy. Even married parents with legitimate children condone bastardy because they know they will be presented with illegitimate grandchildren and dare not reject them.

Below are 21 reasons why the overwhelming majority of people are far more likely to condone bastardy than not:

1) People who are illegitimate
2) Parents of illegitimate children
3) Parents whose legitimate children have presented them with illegitimate grandchildren whom they have not rejected or do not intend to reject
4) People whose illegitimate children have presented them with illegitimate grandchildren whom they have not rejected or do not intend to reject
5) Sex partners of people who are illegitimate
6) Sex partners of people who have illegitimate children
7) Sex partners of people who have illegitimate grandchildren
8) People who have failed marriages
9) LGBTs
10) People who have no intention of marrying
11) People who have no prospect of marrying
12) People whose parents have had failed marriages
13) Atheists
14) Socialists
15) Modern Christians
16) Reform Jews
17) Feminists - and practically all young women identify as feminists unless they are Muslim women or Orthodox Jewesses
18) Cowards afraid of being called bigots
19) Men afraid of upsetting any woman to whom they seek sexual access.
20) Men not prepared to relinquish sexual access to a woman not their wife with whom they currently have sexual access
21) Married politicians too afraid to speaking truth to the power of matriarchy

In our shameless age, only quran.com/24/2 would sufficiently discourage sluts and slut-fuckers.

How the patriarchy would be restored by Secular Koranism in my proposed one party theocracy

My application to be on Millenniyule 2018

MY APPLICATION

Claire Khaw has been promoting Secular Koranism since 2009 believing this to be the only way of restoring the patriarchy and morally regenerating a degenerate civilisation. The government supporting marriage and family values through 

1) the shaming of sluts and the men who cannot resist them by making fornication a sexual offence attracting corporal punishment as prescribed by 24: 2 of the Koran

2) abolishing no fault divorce

3) repealing the Equality Act 2010

would be the only way of restoring the patriarchy and returning the West to moral order. Unfortunately, this must mean dumping democracy and establishing a one party theocracy.

Nothing ventured, nothing gained.  No pain, no gain.  

When did Britain start being a matriarchy? As long ago as 1974 when Keith Joseph criticised unmarried mothers and found Thatcher becoming Tory leader instead of him. I fear if no attempt is made to challenge the matriarchy before its 50th year, Western civilisation would end in ignominy.

Me discussing Secular Koranism with various people

On being compared to Rose West for not agreeing with the Islamophobic narrative

https://www.facebook.com/elizabeth.young.33865854/posts/10156747969562930?comment_id=10156748484037930&notif_id=1538067641520429&notif_t=comment_mention

Because I challenged the Islamophobic narrative of Muslims terrorists and Muslim sex predators committing their crimes because of their religion, I have been compared to Rose West and called "an enabler" of something or other. Anyone noticed to have expressed agreement with the points I have been making on Facebook have been denounced as "bottom feeders". I am also accused of wanting to integrate "Muslim sex perverts".

Much has been made of the fact that I said Muslim criminals would make the most of their opportunities for criminality in a culture of tolerating underage sex. (The Gillick case - establishing the concept of Gillick Competence - gave doctors the legal right to give underage girls contraception without telling their parents, if they thought the girl knew what she was doing. This House of Lords decision was made in 1985. Presumably, underage girls already knew that fornication could result in unwanted pregnancy, which was why they wanted to get the pill from their doctor.)

It seems that pointing out that a culture of tolerating underage sex would only make child prostitution inevitable has turned me into a terrorist sympathiser and a paedophile sympathiser.

It is interesting that the two people who think that Muslim sex predators and terrorists commit their crimes because of their religion refuse to condemn the practice of doctors aiding and abetting underage sex.

I keep asking them their position on Gillick competence, and they keep refusing to answer. I suppose I have to conclude that they want the status quo of continuing to condone underage sex while complaining about Muslims sex predators preying on underage girls. This is so they can continue to feel the righteous indignation they so enjoy feeling while promoting their unofficial religion of Islamophobia.

Doubtless, Tommy Robinson too would take the same position they do which is that doctors should continue being allowed to supply contraceptives to underage girls without fear of being charged with aiding and abetting underage sex.




My proposal of making extramarital sex a crime in particular of punishing unmarried parents with 100 lashes per illegitimate offspring as quran.com/24/2 prescribes is a bit too radical for them. But I just don't see why it wouldn't work or what else would work.

Howard Flight echoes Keith Joseph's 1974 warning that 'our human stock is threatened'

Widely regarded as a Prime Minister in waiting, Keith Joseph, Jew, as long ago as 1974 tried to warn the gentile that his "human stock is threatened" because of the policy of enabling and tolerating single motherhood. However, for his pains he had a woman beat him to becoming leader of the Conservative Party and after that Prime Minister.

If politicians who stick their necks out over a principle and tell the truth are badly treated, then the British public must not be surprised if none of them will do so again. The result is that we now only have unprincipled charlatans in charge trying to do as well as they can before they are removed from office.


If Jeffrey Epstein were my friend before his conviction ...

Why is no journalist asking what Shaun Wright meant when he asked "Why are you picking on Rotherham?"

Why sacking everyone in Rotheram local government will do NO GOOD AT ALL

Race has NOTHING to do with why police were initially reluctant to pursue Muslim sex predators

Claire Khaw in conversation with John Collins from 1:40:00

Does Islam stop Muslims from committing sex crimes?

Why supporters of anti-immigration parties tend to hate and fear Islam and Muslims

It is my view that "organic response" implies a threat perhaps of violence. I have sought clarification, but this has been denied, followed by an invitation to join him in attending a Tommy Robinson rally at the Old Bailey on 2 October 2018. Probably, if  I had been stupid enough to accept his invitation, I imagine that his plan would have beeen to "out" me to the assembled Tommy Robinson supporters and denounce me as "an apologist for Muslim terrorists and Muslim sex predators" and thereby cause me to fear for my safety so much that I would renounce Secular Koranism which he would record on his phone.  

Is there just a hint that I should be able to do kung fu because he is planning something against me that might require the use of any martial arts skills I might have? 

This stream has been deleted.

This stream has been deleted.