Translate

Showing posts with label Pankaj Mishra. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pankaj Mishra. Show all posts

Monday, 30 January 2017

Pankaj Mishra's Age of Anger does not mention how feminism makes men of all races angry




Perhaps he doesn't want to go there. He has an English wife, after all.  (Daughter of the infamously supine, effete and Europhiliac Ferdy Mount) http://www.bigissue.com/features/5103/ferdinand-mount-the-bloody-history-i-share-with-david-cameron

Richard Evans in his review took the words out of my mouth:

 ... none of this in the end actually explains the crisis Mishra has identified. There are many problems with his argument, not least its almost total neglect of Marxism and social democracy as alternatives to and critics of the liberal and neoliberal economic and political order. Above all, long stretches of the book represent what the Germans call Ideengeschichte, a method of approaching the past that treats prominent, “big-name” thinkers as representatives of wider historical trends and interprets the present through a genealogy of their writings instead of situating them in the material and cultural context of their own time.
Unlike Evans, my view is that Mishra has entirely neglected feminism as the cause male anger, female promiscuity, bad parenting and an apparently unstoppable cycle of degeneracy and depravity which our democratic politicians refuse to discuss, let alone address.

I particularly disliked Mishra constant sneering at Trump, but I suppose Mishra cannot help the libtard neocons whom he mixes with, or can he? I cannot imagine that his wife and his father-in-law Ferdy approving of Trump.

All the problems Mishra lists will be dealt with by nationalism and the eradication of feminism. There is a reason why Trump is hated by feminists. They know that Trump is an alpha male and the leader of beta males whose loyalty is increased by every promise he keeps to them. This is of course the definition of a patriarchy which would directly challenge the current matriarchy where all men are beta males lower than sluts whose government governs according to the preferences of sluts where no man may criticise immoral women who are bad wives, bad mothers and insufferable sluts.

I list below two Jewish Englishmen who tried to tick off the tarts but ended up having their careers destroyed:


All the White Man's problems come from his thraldom to his women, who are mostly sluts wielding too much power and who have taken over and infest all the important institutions of the West. They will cling like limpets to their positions unless removed, which they will have to be. Because they are in fact mere women and physically weaker, it will not be a problem for the men to just shoo them away, like you would chickens.   

Trump the builder probably knows something about demolishing buildings past their sell by date.

Think of the building below as the edifice of the matriarchy.



https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/jan/25/age-of-anger-history-of-the-present-pankaj-mishra-review

23/01/16 at 9:38 AM

Dear Pankaj Mishra

Is neo-liberalism the same ideology as neo-conservatism?

If not, what is the difference?

Regards

Claire Khaw


23/01/16 at 9:44 AM

Dear Pankaj Mishra

You wrote " ... the need for masculine bonding and assertion is hugely important. The conservative male sensibility, whether in India or in the US, is deeply threatened by the empowerment of women, and its backlash takes many different forms, from overt violence to the micro-aggressions of everyday sexism. Its sense of siege is further aggravated by the demands the new culture of neo-liberalism places on individuals."

Have you heard of MGTOW?

Regards

Claire Khaw


 23/01/16 at 9:59 AM

Dear Pankaj Mishra
  1. Has the West been failed by Christianity?
  2. Can Christianity be said to have failed because it has fallen to gay marriage?
  3. Can Christianity be said to have failed because it has failed to maintain morality?
  4. What would you say is the purpose of morality?
  5. Have you read the Koran?
  6. Is Islam conceptually superior to Christianity because its source is the Koran, said to be transcribed Word of God directly revealed?
  7. "While the Koran is the directly revealed Word of God, the Bible is merely the reported speech and deeds of God and His prophets by more than one reporter." Would you agree with this assessment?
  8. Between patriarchy and matriarchy, is patriarchy the lesser evil if your goal is to extend the life of your society and your civilisation?
  9. Could Western governments be said to be suffering from collective dementia?
  10. If Western governments could be said to be suffering from collective dementia, what do you think are the causes?
  11. Does feminism cause collective dementia in governments, especially in an environment of indiscriminate universal suffrage?
  12. Have you read Daniel Bell's China Model? http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10418.html
  13. Should the West should give up representative democracy in favour of a system of government that would produce better government?
Regards

Claire Khaw

I tried to make the point that perhaps Islam could perhaps be the middle way between Capitalism and Communism as well as Patriarchy and Matriarchy, but he wasn't interested in engaging at any level.

And this is why he continues to seek the answer, as he was saying to John Humphrys on The Today Programme, rather than already having it in his book.

http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/arts-and-books/interview-pankaj-mishra-fuel-terrorism-book-age-of-anger

One has to understand that for large numbers of people the fundamental experience of the modern world is humiliation. If literature fails to furnish evidence of that, if journalism fails to furnish evidence of that, then we are lost.

Simon Sheppard explores the mind of the spree killer

The sexually frustrated beta male is the type most likely to go on a killing rampage

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Age-Anger-History-Pankaj-Mishra/dp/0241278139

http://www.thehindu.com/books/books-authors/Modi%E2%80%99s-rise-leaves-no-space-for-elite-complacencies-Pankaj-Mishra/article17103313.ece














Thursday, 12 January 2017

Feminism and Western Foreign Policy pointedly *not* discussed at the Progress meeting on countering Muslim terrorism




















































































































































































































































White middle class feminazis in the media who control spineless unprincipled men don't care about the morality of Western foreign policy or social policy. Those who control our media are mostly feminists, gays, atheists and the opposite of people who support marriage and family values.

Having destroyed the masculinity of men of their own race, they now wish to invite men of other races to enter their country in order to destroy their masculinity too.

Under cover of terrorism legislation, the government can easily now censor the free exchange of ideas to demonise anyone who points out an obvious truth or uses logical arguments to press his case.

When people like Anjem Choudary easily win the argument, the government simply ceases to engage with them at all and then incarcerates them.

It is not just Muslim radicals who suffer this treatment, is it? Even now as you read this, plans are afoot to impeach Donald Trump, before he has even been inaugurated.

http://metro.co.uk/2017/01/12/donald-trump-may-get-impeached-within-a-year-if-you-believe-the-betting-odds-6377488/

Corporate media still has a purpose even if the rest of us already know they are the biggest manufacturers of fake news.

This is how it works: the media spin a narrative - any narrative at all, no matter how illogical, transparently false and immoral. Our politicians pretend to believe it and vote for it. 

Thursday, 24 September 2015

Can Tina Brown and her prosecco-drinking cronies really justify Western foreign policy to radicalised Muslim youth?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b06bp2v7

What role can women play in the fight against terror? That’s one of the key themes that will be explored at the Women in the World summit being held in London next month, a group of leading female leaders, thinkers and activists.   It’s the first time the event is being held in London. Tina Brown is the founder of the Women in the World summit and former editor of The New Yorker and Vanity Fair.

From 1:44

MH:

What role can women play in the fight against terrorism? That will be one of the key themes in the Women in the World Summit when it comes to London for the first time next month. The event has taken place in the US for the last six years and it's got bigger each time. It's the brainchild of the former editor of Vanity Fair and The New Yorker, who is with us in the studio. Good morning!

TB:

Good morning.

MH:

Tina, what do you have in mind in terms of women and the fight against terrorism?

TB [in an annoying mid-Atlantic accent]:

We've put together a very very interesting panel of which I would say one of the key members is Dr Edit Schlaffer who is an Austrian woman. She was a social psychologist and she founded an organisation called Sisters Against Violent Extremism and what she does with her organisation is she works with women and mothers to make them partners in security solutions. Her whole feeling is that women are not being left out because we are talking about ramping up military presence and dropping drones [sic] and major martial approaches to terror but women, mothers, sisters, daughters - we are the front line against the war on terror because we can get at the young people, we can get at the children, and we can get at our siblings to help them understand what it is that is the great danger about ISIS and Boko Haram and these other organisations.

MH:

And yet the evidence as far as IS is concerned and as far as this country is concerned is of women going to be part of IS rather than fighting against them ...

TB:

That is indeed certainly a trend, but certainly mothers can do a great deal and what she has established is something she has called her Mothers' Schools [to teach them how to spy on and boss their menfolk around and monitor their political views by threatening to report them to the security services at the drop of a hat, no doubt] and she has done that in Kashmir and Indonesia and she is now also opening schools in Europe in Belgium and Austria. What she does is she uses the women whose children have been radicalised to talk to the women in the community about how they can stop that happening to their own children and she partners with benign imams [sic] who are on her side and can help reach the communities as well so she actually creates a network - a community network so that there is a safe place, in a sense, for these women and families to go because they don't want to talk to law enforcement and end up getting their kids arrested, they don't want to go public in areas where other people are looking at them as if they are some kind of dysfunctional family. There is a real sense of aloneness for women who start to fear that their kids are going wrong. 

MH then goes on to elicit TB's views on the female US Presidential candidates without venturing to rip apart this incoherent harebrained idea. She did just call her "Tina", after all.  If MH ever interviewed me, would she call me "Claire"?  The thrill of hearing her say my name would just overwhelm me with pleasure ...

https://secure.cadoganhall.com/event/women-in-the-world-london-1/book/?performance=1419

http://www.cadoganhall.com/tour-dates/women-in-the-world-london

PARTICIPANTS INCLUDE:

A stellar line-up of international names including actors Meryl Streep, Carey Mulligan and Rupert Everett, First Minister of Scotland Nicola Sturgeon, Cara Delevingne, Her Majesty Queen Rania Al Abdullah of Jordan, German Federal Minister of Defence Dr. Ursula von der Leyen, Baroness Mary Goudie, Liberian Nobel Peace Laureate Leymah Gbowee, architect Zaha Hadid, author Frances Osborne, actor Archie Panjabi, Member of Parliament Mhairi Black, ‘Inspire’ co-founder Sara Khan, Baroness Valerie Amos, UK Minister for Internet Safety and Security Baroness Joanna Shields, historians Simon Schama and Amanda Foreman, Saint Monica Girls’ Tailoring Centre Director Sister Rosemary Nyirumbe, film director Sarah Gavron, co-founder of Women’s Equality Party Catherine Mayer and founder of Women for Women International Zainab Salbi, with more to be announced.

https://www.majesticwinecalais.co.uk/Prosecco-Corte-Alta-zidF-36095
Only £3.99 a bottle at Majestic in Calais.

How to think about Islamic State by Pankaj Mishra

Powerlessness and deprivation are exacerbated today by the ability, boosted by digital media, to constantly compare your life with the lives of the fortunate (especially women entering the workforce or prominent in the public sphere: a common source of rage for men with siege mentalities worldwide). 

In other words, the misogyny caused by feminism and the perception of feminazis in positions of power over men sends young men straight into the arms of Islamic State. It would appear that Tina Brown and her cosy little circle are actually a big part of the problem, rather than the solution with their incoherent and transparently self-aggrandising ideas. How would you as a man feel if you realised that your wife and her feminazi coven are monitoring your and your son's political views at the dinner table?  She may even maliciously accuse you to expedite her divorce and improve the terms of the settlement. It is quite laughable to think that she and her prosecco-guzzling circle would do anything useful other than to alienate men even more and make them more likely to join ISIS in order to defy and challenge the matriarchy. The government would be crazy to pay for this initiative, but then again we already know that those in charge of the ship of state are imbeciles, lunatics and extremists, don't we?

Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...