THE VOICE OF REASON
Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
Translate
Showing posts with label Philip Davies MP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Philip Davies MP. Show all posts
Sir Christopher Chope MP blocked the Voyeurism (Offences) Bill, which would make "upskirting" a criminal offence if it was passed https://t.co/er2vuZVHzb
If you are anti-feminist, you MUST support Christopher Chope and @PhilipDaviesUK. Do you fear an immoral woman might falsely and maliciously accuse you of a historic sexual offence if you challenge feminism? The fightback against feminism MUST begin now! https://t.co/pz6cVv8iC3https://t.co/d8BHV3EInq
I wonder if I could get beta male victims of feminism of the West to send flowers to Christopher Chope and @PhilipDaviesUK for striving so bravely to prevent yet another feminazi law. #Upskirting could easily be prevented if women wore longer skirts. https://t.co/pz6cVv8iC3
I say send flowers to male Parliamentarians who do the right thing to encourage them and tell them they have your support, or they will give up and surrender to the Feminist State who want to remain in the EU. #upskirting@PhilipDaviesUKhttps://t.co/SeKGriXRT8
If you want to overthrow the Feminist State, you must reward men who stand up to feminazi sluts in short skirts with upskirting problems. @PhilipDaviesUKhttps://t.co/DhPmhENCoW
Are there any other male Parliamentarians other than Christopher Chope and @PhilipDaviesUK prepared to stand up to feminazi sluts in short skirts who can easily solve their upskirting problem by wearing longer skirts? Let's hope they stand up and be counted. #feminismhttps://t.co/koHNHf54jq
You should probably use an independent florist for this purpose. They will be gay or female, probably. You could make enquiries to make sure only florists who disagree with jailing men for for up to two years for the proposed crime of #upskirting get your custom. https://t.co/DhPmhENCoW
This would be the perfect peaceful way to challenge the feminazis of our oppressive and parasitic Feminist State whose supporters are Brexit-blocking basTURDS who should now be finally flushed away before more damage is done. The EU is a pro-immigration feminazi protection scheme https://t.co/H2FsvB9kh2
But surely there must be one florist in your city prepared to say that he does not agree with the proposal to jail men for up to two years for the proposed new offence of upskirting? Let him get all the business then! @PhilipDaviesUK
I propose a special Chope & Davies Bouquet which would for obvious reasons have an arrangement suggesting Principled Masculinity. I wonder if it is possible to convey this in a flower arrangement. What do you think, @FloristsReview? @PhilipDaviesUK
Mood: Tagged into a bizarre thread about macho florists sending supportive manly flowers to MPs who want to look at young girls’ pants, and genuinely unable to tell satire from insanity. https://t.co/vY9MfqBP8L
— Christopher Chope likes strangers’ underwear. (@ArglesJonathan) June 17, 2018
It is impossible to upskirt a woman wearing a skirt that comes down below her knees. But do correct me if I am wrong and you know better! #upskirtingbill
I am no flower arranger, but think a phallic cactus should be part of the arrangement that is intended to convey Principled Masculinity in the face of a tsunami of venomous feminazi harridans, don't you think, @FloristsReview? @ArglesJonathan@ChrisChopeMP#upskirtingbill
Women we really need to pull ourselves together. We don't need to go running to mummy or daddy every time something happens we don't like. https://t.co/dZg6jx4Fgr
Middle class men are too afraid to challenge feminism because they are afraid of being accused of a historic sexual offence or of their wives divorcing them and then taking half their stuff and depriving them of their children.
Philip Davies MP who used to make a stand against feminism is now too cucked and afraid to challenge feminism. Can anyone tell me when it was he last made an anti-feminist comment? You can be sure that the feminazi MPs have put the frighteners on him. He also knows that there is no such thing as male solidarity amongst male Tory MPs so if the feminazis get him, there will no masculine call to rally to his aid. Atomised Western men are invariably atheist, unprincipled and cannot think beyond the next election or sexual encounter.
Roger Scruton, Conservative philosopher, is now so old and doddery that he must know that his wife will soon be his nurse so he will understandably refrain from criticising feminism for the sake of domestic harmony. He has already told me his views on feminism is exactly that of Christina Hoff Sommers', no more and no less. (It is a bit like an anti-Semite saying exactly 6 million Jews died in the Holocaust, no more and no less, wouldn't you say?) He also has a son to put through Eton, that school for unprincipled public school cucks. Don't expect him to risk any of that on your behalf, O Oppressed Men of the Matriarchy! Old men lose their testosterone and become old women, afraid to say too much in case their teeth fall out, or if saying anything should make their nurse angry at them and treat them roughly.
Isn't it a delicious irony that I, a female and a foreigner, should presume to care more about oppressed white men oppressed by feminism who are not my father, husband nor son? It must be because I am that rare female with a sense of justice, I suppose. It is probably because I was not born here and had part of my education abroad that made me retain some kind of decency, principle and fighting spirit, for which I only have my parents to thank. I like to think of myself as the little Dutch boy with his finger in the dyke, doing it only because there is no one else around to do it.
Simon Sheppard in York Crown Court on 22 February 2018 at 9:30 over the right of the indigenous white male to use the N word without being punished when he has committed no public order offence.https://t.co/Ow6oFwhZyy
According to Simon, the subliminal message being promoted by the liberal media is that it is OK for justice to be withheld from people you dislike and even hurt and kill them, especially if you think they are racists.
O you who have believed, be persistently standing firm for Allah , witnesses in justice, and do not let the hatred of a people prevent you from being just. Be just; that is nearer to righteousness. And fear Allah ; indeed, Allah is Acquainted with what you do.
Morality comes from religion. Morality is about obtaining group solidarity. British men cannot cooperate because their lack of male solidarity makes it impossible for them to cooperate with each other to solve problems.
They lack male solidarity because Christianity has failed.
Once they realise they cannot cooperate with each other to solve problems they will pretend the problem cannot be solved and ignore obvious solutions because they have lost the will to fight. Once they reach this conclusion, they will deny truth and the operation of logic and morality. That is why no senior male politician will be criticise feminism and leave it to little Philip Davies MP - the only MP in Britain who once dared speak up against feminism - who is now too scared to say or do anything, for fear of being accused of a historic sexual offence.
Feminism operates by bribing men with extramarital sex until they are hooked on it and then accusing them of sexual misconduct.
Being atomised and lacking trust in God or self-belief, they do not think they can individually or collectively do anything to fight the oppression of the matriarchy and feel they can only lie low.
Lacking in male solidarity, they do not trust anyone.
Lacking in inter-generational concern for one another, the elder, wiser and more experienced do not see it as their job's worth to advise and warn the younger. Lacking in respect for the elderly, the young are not disposed to listen to the older generation.
And this is why nationalism will never get off the ground in the West once Trump has come and gone, because he is not going to live forever, is he? How many billionaires are likely to want to give him up their peace of mind and leisure to deal with the burdens of office for the ungrateful, disloyal, unreliable and hateful?
Political Correctness is an euphemism for political censorship, which is nothing new. In every age there are certain things that cannot be said and certain things that must be said to show you are a member of the dominant culture or aspire to be.
Currently, Political Correctness is a catch-all term to acknowledge the privilege all the protected groups of the matriarchy under what is laughably called equality legislation. These days there is even something nonsensically called the Women and Equalities Commission.
The question comes to mind about how many “equalities” there are, if there are more than one. Men are now apparently able to claim they are the equal of women at giving birth and claiming parental leave. Women are allowed to claim they are the equal of men at soldiering, policing and not suffering unwanted pregnancy after having casual sex, apparently.
It was Aristotle who said that it is the greatest injustice to treat unequal things equally, and this is surely undeniable. What if God just decided He couldn’t be bothered to decide who should go to heaven or hell, in the way that an examiner decided he could no longer be bothered to mark exam papers because he was tired of having to decipher bad handwriting, make sense of incorrectly spelled words and excruciating grammar? What if God decided to send everyone to hell irrespective of their conduct? What if He decided to send everyone to heaven irrespective of their conduct because He just couldn’t be bothered to sort the sheep from the goats and the chaff from the wheat?
When I was learning English grammar at primary school, I learned the difference between a quantifiable noun and an unquantifiable noun. An example of a quantifiable noun is people, but these days you often hear BBC presenters wallowing in their degeneracy talking about “the amount of people”. As Montaigne said, grammar is the logic of language. In a matriarchy, logic is avoided the way an ugly woman avoids mirrors. If I were still at primary school and you asked me if equality was a quantifiable noun, I would have said no, because you cannot talk in terms of having one equality and then of having two equalities, in the way I might have one potato and acquire a second potato and be said to have two potatoes. Since MPs were persuaded by a Tory Prime Minister into voting for gay marriage with significantly more female MPs prepared to go along with legalising gay marriage than male MPs, it is a given that the House has taken leave of its senses and can no longer be trusted and taken at its word in anything it does. Many MPs are muddle-headed, capricious and incompetent women like our female Prime Minister, or cucked men afraid of incurring her wrath and being kicked out of her cabinet.
A large part of Political Correctness is about inflicting the injustice of treating unequal things equally and not calling things by their proper names, thus corrupting language, thought and of course the very thought processes necessary to reach correct decisions to promote good government.
[This c 500 word essay is part of my application to be the Parliamentary Assistant of Philip Davies MP. I have one previous application to be an MP's secretary and believe I would have been successful if I was prepared to take a pay cut. That MP was Simon Hughes. I remember being impressed by his grasp of detail at my interview.]
This will not be allowed to happen by the powers that be. The theory that Theresa May was bribed by the Deep State to take a dive in order to sabotage Brexit should be discussed in the “right-wing press” if indeed such a thing were allowed to exist in our totalitarian state. It is not.
As all who have taken an intelligent interest in Western politics must already know, the Western media is controlled by the CIA and the US Deep State.
It was really Trump who gave Britain and France the permission to Brexit and Frexit, but the US Deep State has been thwarting his every move and even induced him to fire missiles at Syria and other war crimes. As we can see, Trump has had balls cut off and his every move blocked, presumably as a warning to any other US billionaires thinking of running for President in the future.
While we do not know if Theresa May really was instructed to shoot herself in the foot and then the mouth ie call an election when she already had a healthy majority in order to lose it by announcing unpopular policies, how she lives after she quits politics will be indicative of whether she sabotaged Brexit intentionally. Perhaps it was her advisers who were guilty of malign encouragement, or perhaps it was all just a series of unfortunate events caused by her incompetence as a Prime Minister, a role to which she as another female mediocrity would have been routinely over-promoted as a matter of course in our degenerate matriarchy.
Had I been Prime Minister, I would have invited Marine Le Pen to lunch, dinner and asked her to stay for breakfast at Downing Street as well as promising the French troops to quell any anti-Frexit feeling post Frexit. I would also be promising to do the same for the leaders of AfD for German elections in September. Had I been Prime Minister, I would have declared a state of emergency and martial law after repealing the European Communities Act 1972 and declared a National Government with elections to be held with a significantly narrowed franchise of taxpayers only, after things have calmed down and the social parasites disenfranchised. The low-waged would be relieved of the burden of paying taxes and voting. While these measures may sound a little alarming to some, it is really the only way of getting the thing done.
The Americans would then bomb us but we would defy and denounce them until they feel so ashamed of themselves they return to their own continent with their tail between their legs. It will be through fighting our National War of Independence that our 21st century British national identity will be forged in the furnace of iron and blood!
Why does the US Deep State want Britain in the EU? To suit its administrative convenience. It prefers to deal with all its vassal states as a bloc than individually, just as you might call a meeting at work to tell employees what the new regime is, rather than speak to each individually. It is also easier to get key members of the EU appointed than to rig elections.
The election of Trump and the cutting off of his balls is a very clear message to the discerning voter that the will of the people – socially conservative, nationalist and hungering for their nations to be rationally governed by men they admire and trust rather than the cucks and female mediocrities we have to put up with – will forever be thwarted as long as the US Deep State has breath in its body.
Who are the foot soldiers and cannon fodder of the US Deep State? Voters, of course, voting for parties with policies destructive to their the national interest, or MPs pressured into voting for policies injurious to the national interest such as yet more neocon wars, gay marriage, more military spending to bomb and murder who the Americans tell us to bomb and murder. Voters, especially female voters, are supremely indifferent and ignorant of foreign policy while having every wish to stay this way because of its complexity and the sleep-losing nature of our dishonourable foreign policy which clearly provokes Muslim terrorism which mainstream media are forbidden from discussing.
[This c 500 word essay is part of my application to be the Parliamentary Assistant of Philip Davies MP. I have one previous application to be an MP's secretary and believe I would have been successful if I was prepared to take a pay cut. That MP was Simon Hughes. I remember being impressed by his grasp of detail at my interview.]
I have met Jared Taylor and tried to tell him that feminism is the disease that is causing Western malaise, but he insists on going on about the low IQ and criminality of blacks. If this is so, the reason is simple: bad single parenting by never married black mothers.
East Asians are smarter than whites, Taylor acknowledges. There is a reason for this. Our mothers are not mostly Slut Single Mothers and we practice family values, just like the Jews, while the whites have turned black. I have tried to say this to him a number of times after that time I met him in London, but he never acknowledged my communications.
While watching the video I was jumping up and down shouting "Don't even go there! Why don't you say this instead? Why haven't you mentioned that?"
At the end I just wanted to bang my head against my keyboard.
ARGH! WHY DO I CARE SO MUCH ABOUT WHITE PEOPLE??!!
Is it cos I think I am white? No, I am actually very racially aware and also conscious that I am a product of the British Empire. What I do is treat white people as if they were my people because over the years they have been very kind to me and I never felt as if I was not part of their society. Even British nationalists have been quite accepting once they got used to me, which made me think that acceptance is all about familiarity and trust. Because I go on and on and on about the things I go on about, nationalists feel they know my brand and by extension what they imagine me to be, even if they have never met me or disagree with me about White Sharia (which I call Secular Koranism).
It is certainly ironic that out of all the political parties I have ever joined, the only party whose members I would call friends are from the BNP.
Why do I care about white people? Over the years they have been friends and lovers and family members. Also, I live in the land of white people and out of pure self interest want them and their government to sort their shit out. While some unpleasant and uneducated white people tell me to sling my hook and go back to where I came from, the fact remains that slinging my hook and going to back where I came from would be a sign of defeat. I am a fighter, not a quitter. My instinct - which I like to think is a very alpha male instinct - is to double down and stick to my guns because I just know I am right about what's wrong with Western civilisation: feminism.
Also, it would be real feather in my cap if I were to be credited with saving Western civilisation from feminism, particularly as a female and foreigner. It is after all in the West that the matriarchy is the strongest and the rottenness of the morals of the West plain to everyone else not of the West. It is in the dragon's den that the dragon is to be found, to be slain in its lair.
Why am I not famous already?
I would have my own TV chat show now if there were any justice in the West, or at the very least my own column in a national or international publication, but there is no justice in the West, is there?
This because the whole system is rigged. The only Conservative writers allowed to derive an income from their Conservatism in Britain are weak, neurotic writers like Peter Hitchens who refuses to critcise sluts for family reasons. http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/peter-hitchens-wont-condemn-low-sexual.html Roger Scruton, the only other Conservative thinker I can think of, is elderly and probably too doddery to offend and annoy his wife (who will soon be this nurse) by challenging feminism. http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/roger-scruton-conservative-philosopher.html I know some white people are angry about Katie Hopkins being sacked from LBC for suggesting that Muslims should be gassed like Jews were in Hitler's Final Solution , but she is hardly an intellectual or a philosopher, is she?
Other formerly successful white alpha males are being picked off one by one with probably false and exaggerated claims of sexual misconduct eg Max Clifford, Rolf Harris etc.
Ironically, I am actually the ideal person to lead the fight against feminism because I have no wife to offend and really don't mind if sluts won't have sex with me.
To lead the fight against feminism effectively and with authority, I need the acknowledgement and endorsement of nationalists. Only when this is done might MSM deign to acknowledge my existence. Currently, they don't even dare to mock me for fear of giving me the oxygen of publicity, because, according to them, someone like me is not supposed to exist. Because all Western journalists are libtard, they have dispensed with their journalistic integrity to report the newsworthy - and boy am I newsworthy! - and make a point of ignoring and not reporting any story that is not in harmony with their narrow libtard worldview. In short, MSM refuse to acknowledge my existence because I do not fit in with their narrative. I was nearly in a Channel 5 hatchet job on UKIP. They filmed me for 6 hours over two days, but I still ended up on the cutting room floor.
I don't think it was because I was so boring and stupid that they couldn't include me, do you? The whole idea of the UKIP hatchet job was to show UKIP supporters as social retards and weirdos, of course. They didn't want me in their documentary precisely because I did seem nice and normal, sane and articulate, capable of making my case in easy-to-remember soundbites. That was the real reason why I was excluded.
Elevator pitch, thy name is Claire Khaw.
But can I really be a better white nationalist than an actual white person?
I think so. I'd damn well like to try out my ideas at a really tough interview.
The trouble with white people is that they are scared of me. I have already offered to be interrogated by a panel of libtard intellectuals but my offer has been predictably ignored. I can't even get a single white nationalist YouTuber to have a discussion with me.
Come on, white nationalist YouTubers! I really ain't that scary. I'm so stupid I can't even do my own YouTube channel to go on about White Nationalism and other related matters like feminism, slut-shaming, religion and politics and stuff.
Why don't I just have my own YouTube channel, you ask? Because I don't know how to and it would look like crap with me just droning on about this and that, taking much much longer to make my point than if you just read what I said in a tweet. I know instinctively that it would be far better if it were a dialogue.
I have been on Stefan Molyneux twice, but I suspect he didn't know who I was.
Why haven't I managed to get any nationalist to feature me on his channel?
So far I only have Mark Collett who says yes in principle, but he is too busy at the moment. Millennial Woes said he would feature me in Millenyule, his Xmas special, so that might be something to look forward to, if WW3 has not started and Western civilisation already fallen.
If you would like me on their channels, please get in touch with both of them to tell them so, so they get their skates on. There is no time to be lost, yet these youngish men behave as if they have all the time in the world for things to sort themselves out. On the one hand Millennial Woes says there will be civil war in the next ten years, on the other he is waiting till Xmas to have me on his show ...
As for the anti-feminist Liberty Belles, they want nothing to do with me believing me to be an extremist while at the same time refusing to discuss the subject of extremism with me. One of them has said she will do it with me in her own capacity, but I bet she never gets round to it. They are very boring anyway as you can see in the video below, but it is just the principle of the thing. This is the most interesting video they have ever done, interviewing Britain's only anti-feminist MP, and even that is really really boring. The trouble with women in general is their almost irredeemable mediocrity and censoriousness. The Queen Bee of the Liberty Belles is the academic Belinda Brown who is too much of a snooty Catholic to acknowledge my existence. It is she I would really like to defeat in debate about my alleged extremism, but I know is too busy pretending I don't exist.
As for the female nationalists, I imagine they are feeling intellectually intimidated and don't want to share their limelight with me. I am after all a competitor. They all talk too fast gabbling away, in most cases only having a following because they are perceived to be young and sexy by hungry and thirsty white men, not for anything they actually say or propose. Or they say they are mixed race but don't really look non-white at all. There is not a single original thinker amongst them. I have also been saying that male nationalists should not allow themselves to be distracted through fighting each other to obtain their sexual favours, for example, and must stop treating them as if their opinions mattered.
I am of course a different kettle of fish precisely I am not young and sexy and even if I were would be wearing a niqab on my YouTube channel to stop men from being distracted by my beauty to prevent them from fighting each other to win my sexual favours.
It is of course feminism that has heralded in our shallow Cult of Youth in which your opinions only matter if you are young and sexy and cool. This is why our politicians are always trying to get libtard and vacuous pop singers to endorse their idiocies.
I have no intention of showing myself because I don't want to have to do my hair or put on makeup every time I appear wondering what people will think of me for not being as young and sexy as they would like. It will just be my voice you will hear because that is what I want people to concentrate on.
When I am famous enough and MSM want to show me in my full glory, then you shall all behold me, glorious and resplendent. But you have to work to get me there.
The
Liberty Belles are a collective of 5 UK based ladies who love liberty
and despise feminism. Our sub-campaign #LadiesforPhilipDavies aims to
support @phil...
Claire KhawI
know you ladies don't want anything to do with me, but at least try
asking him some interesting questions! I will now give you a list of
questions you should have asked him.
Claire KhawOf
course it would have been better if I were the person actually asking
him the questions as if I were the chat show host and he were the guest
on my show with you girls not even in the frame. Heh heh.
Claire Khaw"Men
with alpha male qualities who are attractive to women hardly ever
challenge feminism. Is it because they get enough sex and don't want to
lose their access to sexually available women by shaming sluts, unlike
beta males like you who don't and have nothing to lose?"
Claire Khaw"What
do you think of Claire Khaw, Britain's leading anti-feminist and her
ideas for restoring the patriarchy by establishing a one party theocracy
governed under the principles of Secular Koranism?"
Claire Khaw"Claire
Khaw is prepared to pretend to date you in order to give you the
publicity you require to win on 8 June 2017. Are you prepared to pretend
to date her to turbo-charge your challenge to feminism?"
Claire Khaw"Is
the reason why you are the only male MP in the land prepared to
challenge feminism because all male MPs more senior to you are even more
cucked?"
Claire Khaw"Would
you agree with Claire Khaw that all advanced civilisations are
patriarchies and all declining and primitive societies are
matriarchies?"
Claire Khaw"What
do you think men of other races and nations will think and do once they
learn that white Western men are lower than sluts in the West? Would
this make them bolder and come to exploit the resources of the West in
greater numbers and boldness?"
