The burden and standard of proof required for a conviction against American men is now uncertain

If the Democrats prevent Judge Kavanaugh's appointment from taking place in this round of Trump-bashing, it will be even more blurred and uncertain afterwards.

Men in particular should note this inevitability. Hey, how long is Bill Crosby going to be in prison? How long will you be in prison if a malicious and false accusation is believed by the judge and jury?

"We believe survivors!"

What is wrong with this sentence?

These women accusing Judge Kavanaugh are called "survivors". Once you call these possibly false and malicious accusers "survivors", you are assuming the guilt of Judge Kavanaugh.

A superior man, in regard to what he does not know, shows a cautious reserve. If names be not correct, language is not in accordance with the truth of things. If language be not in accordance with the truth of things, affairs cannot be carried on to success. When affairs cannot be carried on to success, proprieties and music do not flourish. When proprieties and music do not flourish, punishments will not be properly awarded. When punishments are not properly awarded, the people do not know how to move hand or foot. Therefore a superior man considers it necessary that the names he uses may be spoken appropriately, and also that what he speaks may be carried out appropriately. What the superior man requires is just that in his words there may be nothing incorrect.

— Confucius

Too bad with so many Jewish lawyers in America, not a single one of them has yet come forward to mention Deuteronomy 19:15

One witness is not enough to convict anyone accused of any crime or offense they may have committed. A matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.

Perhaps all the Jews and gentiles of America have collectively lost their so-called Judeo-Christian heritage all at the same time. If so, they shouldn't be complaining about acquiring an Islamic one because they sure as hell need a religion that promotes patriarchal moral values to stop immoral women from taking over the ship of state and crashing Western civilisation on to the rocks, where all the men are lower than immoral women who can silence any man by accusing him of a historic sexual offence.

The self-loathing I imagine Western men - Muslim and non-Muslim - must feel because they live in a matriarchy

I wonder the impression men of other races, religions and nations think of the white man.

That he is a sodomite because his government has legalised gay marriage?

That he will soon be divorced, expelled from his matrimonial homse and deprived of his children (which might not have been his in anyway) because his matriarchy proposes to formally introduce no fault divorce?

That as well as being confused about his sexual orientation, he is probably also confused about his gender identity requiring the provision gender neutral toilets by the state to help him come to terms with his gender dysphoria.

That he cannot make up his mind who or what he is because of the great fuss currently being made about the correct use of gender pronouns?

That he no longer dares to protest against the matriarchy because he is afraid of being accused of a historic sexual offence where an accusation from a probably false and malicious complainaint from a woman offended by a male politician will be as good as a conviction. The white man is but the slave of his parasitic matriarchy and completely under its thumb.

Could the civilisation of such a neurotic pathetic worm deserve to survive?

There is probably a reason why Muslims who cross sea and land to come here end up blowing themselves up when they realise the future ahead of them, their illegitimate offspring and their illegitimate and degenerate descendants who will be bumping along at the bottom as members of the criminal classes.

Living in the West causes degeneracy and despir.

Dying empires become black holes

Dying empires are like dying stars because in their death throes and collapse, they are liable to suck in everything around them into a vortex of chaos and extinction. Decline therefore must be managed very carefully indeed.

Some attempt must be made to acknowledge the mistakes of the past to prevent future generations from having to re-learn the same painful mistakes.

All the mistakes of the West can be attributed to breaking the laws of God contained in the Koran and thus allowing the patriarchy - which was what made the West great - to be destroyed by feminism.

Because sexual corruption leads to moral corruption and moral corruption leads to intellectual corruption, no senior male poiltician now dares to challenge the matriarchy because they are now all terrified of being accused of a hisitoric sexual offence. In a matriarchy, an accusation of a historic sexual offence by even a porn actress against the US President will be treated as a conviction even if it was only the accusation of an inmmoral and promiscuous woman who broke her Non-Disclosure Agreement.

Once intellectual corruption is widespread and rife, Western Man will no longer be able to use truth, logic and morality to solve and avoid problems.

This means Western Man will be unable to organise against the weak, stupid and corrupt who now rule over him, even though this is in theory the easiest thing in the world. Being more often than not the product of a fatherless home, he will fear to organise a challenge to the matriarchy because he will have lost the male solidarity that enables him to trust other males of his nationality and race, the other essential ingriedent of patriarchy other than that of the prohibition of extramarital sex.

Western Man has nothing to fear but fear tself. It is now time to call a spade a spade and a slut a slut and see where that takes him. At the very least, he should not fear to ask any obvious questions that occur to him at https://ask.fm/oneparty4all

Marriage and the soon to be extinct matriarchies of the West

Sexual immorality leads to moral corruption, moral corruption leads to intellectual corruption and intellectual corruption means eventually being unable to use truth, logic and morality to solve political problems.

The gold standard of sexual morality is marriage.

Without marriage there can be no patriarchy.

Without patriarchy not enough good strong men will be produced to defend the national interest.

The perfect patriarchy - 100% married parents

The perfect matriarchy - 100% unmarried parents

What is the illegitimacy rate of your Western nation?

If your nation regards fornication and bastardy as normal, you are a matriarchy.

Other signs that you live in a matriarchy is an ageing and shrinking population incapable of facing its past or admitting its mistakes with ever lowering standards of education and behaviour where sexual liberation from the rules of marriage has become the opium of the people.

Such people go against their traditions, break their own rules while no senior male politician dares to defend the national interest because he is in fear of being accused of a historic sexual offence knowing that he will not be defended by other senior male politicians who in turn also fear being accused of a historic sexual offence.

The rule against no criminal court entertaining any accusation made solely on the uncorroborated testimony of a possibly lying witness that used to be a cornerstone of English liberty has been long forgotten.

After half a century of feminism, the British have all but forgotten their Judeo-Christian heritage. Probably, no sitting member of the legislature or judiciary is even aware of the prohibition in Deuteronomy 19:15 of convicting anyone accused of a crime on the sole uncorroborated testimony of one possibly lying witness. If they are aware of this prohibition, they will be too afraid of pointing this out, because they are also in fear of being accused of a historic sexual offence by a possibly lying witness which the police are now required to take seriously.

https://biblehub.com/deuteronomy/19-15.htm

Why feminist egalitarianism damages male solidarity and social cohesion

In a patriarchy, the alpha male is a leader of beta males. This means that the beta males choose their leader ie the alpha male.

In a patriarchy the status of the female is derived from the status of her father or husband.

The command structure of an army is very simple and accountable. Orders are given from above, and is passed downwards. When someone disobeys the order or fails to perform his duty, you can find the weak link in the chain of command.

In a matriarchy the male leader is chosen by the females whose interests and preferences are different from and in opposition to male interests. Because they are potentially half the vote in any liberal democracy, female votes will always be chased and the male preferences marginalised. Therefore in a matriarchy the male leader is always mainly chosen by females and this means the marginalisation of male interests.

Because the idea of feminism is egalitarian, everyone in an egalitarian society in which feminism flourishes will think they are equal, when in reality they are not. The wise and strong should lead the foolish and weak, not the other way round. This is precisely what intersectional feminism is all about though: it basically inverts the pyramid structure of the class system at the expense of everyone in the middle. Worse, it encourages undesirable behaviour and discourages moral behaviour ie discouraging chastity, thrift, prudence and industry putting the path of your society on the road to perdition since it is a political system that is in effect a systematic cultivation of failure.

In an egalitarian society, everyone will think they are just as good as everyone else, and this means no one can be corrected. If any attempt is made, the person attempting the correction will be asked "Who are you to tell me what to do?" The person attempt to make the correction will be insulted, lied about, accused, threatened with violence or even suffer violence.

This means leaders dare not correct their followers, and things go wrong.

Also, in a matriarchy, all men are lower in status than the unmarried single mother with illegitimate offspring which she often badly parents. This must be so because not even the US President - supposedly the most powerful man in the world - dares not criticise unmarried single mothers or propose the abolition of no fault divorce.

If men in the West are in effect slaves to the female preference, then it means that they have to think and talk in a way that women like, and this turns them into women.

Men mind about immigration much more than women and these men are beta males ie low status men who have to compete for jobs and resources and who are most likely to say racist things or do not have the social graces or education to say what they feel to be true without avoiding denunciations of racism, antisemitism, Islamophobia or sexism.

When Ken Livingstone of all people ends up having to resign from the Labour Party for antisemitism, you know the game is up as regards impartial news-reporting or a Labour leader with any leadership qualities in control of his party. When a Labour leader cannot protect his oldest ally who is clearly innocent of a non-existent offence, you know the game is up as regards getting a decent leader for your country even if the current childless clueless woman's government falls.



As I was saying, lower class men do not have the best of appearances or manners likely to appeal to white middle class feminists who run the show and who will instinctively despise them and find them viscerally repulsive.

Men, when women think this of you, they more or less think you do not deserve to live, let alone enjoy reproductive rights with a member of their sex.They would rather fuck foreign men and invite them into your country by voting for governments that support mass immigration, and not even realise that this is what they are doing because they will have been indoctrinated into thinking that being called racist - as you surely will be if you protest about uncontrolled mass immigration - is the worst crime you can ever be guilty of.

As regards the hierarchy of a matriarchy, there is none. This means no one is really in charge. It is basically run on fear, lust and ever faster buck-passing. Insofar as a hierarchy exists, it is represented by the Cult of Youth. The most powerful members of society are the young, sexy and foolish, who will of course abuse whatever power they have, destroying themselves, others and their own civilisation in the process. These would be mostly the over-entitled female undergraduates with their Guardianista ideas who wrap pussy-hungry male graduates round their little finger at universities, destroying their education and often their reputations if these male undergraduates end up being falsely and maliciously accused of regret rape.

These female undergraduates will soon become graduates and acquire positions of influence and status in the professions. If men protest, they will be falsely and maliciously accused of a historic sexual offence to keep them quiet.

The wages of feminism and egalitarianism is the death of your civilisation.

O ye who believe! Truly, among your wives and your children are (some that are) enemies to yourselves: so beware of them! But if ye forgive and overlook, and cover up (their faults), verily Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.https://t.co/y8xWBI1Fwp

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 22, 2018

Restoring patriarchy and the real purpose of marriage

Why nationalism is impossible without patriarchal moral values

Morality comes from religion. Morality is about obtaining group solidarity. British men cannot cooperate because their lack of male solidarity makes it impossible for them to cooperate with each other to solve problems.

They lack male solidarity because Christianity has failed. 

Once they realise they cannot cooperate with each other to solve problems they will pretend the problem cannot be solved and ignore obvious solutions because they have lost the will to fight. Once they reach this conclusion, they will deny truth and the operation of logic and morality. That is why no senior male politician will be criticise feminism and leave it to little Philip Davies MP - the only MP in Britain who once dared speak up against feminism - who is now too scared to say or do anything, for fear of being accused of a historic sexual offence. 

Feminism operates by bribing men with extramarital sex until they are hooked on it and then accusing them of sexual misconduct.

Being atomised and lacking trust in God or self-belief, they do not think they can individually or collectively do anything to fight the oppression of the matriarchy and feel they can only lie low. 

Lacking in male solidarity, they do not trust anyone. 

Lacking in inter-generational concern for one another, the elder, wiser and more experienced do not see it as their job's worth to advise and warn the younger.  Lacking in respect for the elderly, the young are not disposed to listen to the older generation. 

And this is why nationalism will never get off the ground in the West once Trump has come and gone, because he is not going to live forever, is he?  How many billionaires are likely to want to give him up their peace of mind and leisure to deal with the burdens of office for the ungrateful, disloyal, unreliable and hateful? 

How do you prove that you didn't have sex with a lying schoolgirl who said you did?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2850960/RE-teacher-accused-18-month-affair-girl-pupil-claims-vain-stalker-teenager-up.html

She told jurors that Kerner took her virginity in one of the store cupboards, and claimed he had once taken her for a day-long sex session at his home while his wife at work.

How would you prove that you didn't take the virginity of a schoolgirl in a store cupboard, on a yoga mat, or that you didn't take her out for a day-long sex session in your home while your wife was at work?

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/teacher-stuart-kerner-who-took-4755793

The English tradition that guilt must be proven beyond reasonable doubt has been suspended in the case of men accused of a historic sexual offence, but no English lawyer seems to have noticed this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_absence

Is it because they are mostly female these days?

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/dec/23/more-female-solicitors-than-men-scotland-law

The rate at which women are being appointed judges is gathering momentum in a “snowball effect”, ensuring gender equality on the bench is not that far away

Male students are outnumbered by females at most UK universities. 

the latest Law Society statistics show that that 62.4% of students accepted onto LLB courses in England and Wales in 2012 were women 

The Division is led by the Lord Chief Justice, currently Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, assisted by the Vice-President of the Criminal Division, currently Lady Justice Hallett.

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales#Criminal_Division

Lady Justice Hallett: 'Senior judge propositioned me after getting me promotion'

Perhaps he did, perhaps he didn't. If he did, perhaps he was joking. It is unlikely now that he will come forward and say he was only joking, is he? Feminazis complaining about sexism are infamous for their humourlessness. What if a male judge dissents from Lady Justice? It would be the easiest thing in the world for her to accuse him of a historic sexual offence to get him to toe the feminazi line. Just the mere hint of a threat would be enough. 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/8875040/Lady-Justice-Hallett-profile.html

Thomas is one of the Founding Members of the European Law Institute, a non-profit organisation that conducts research, makes recommendations and provides practical guidance in the field of European legal development with a goal of enhancing the European legal integration.

As for Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, it does sound like he will be voting to remain on 23 June 2016. This makes him a liberal, and we know what liberal judges do to the beta male victims of feminism, don't we?

@realkatykerner @ntfem @snook1111pie @Alvhun @prisonerben1 - Court of Criminal Appeal has a very poor reputation

— A woman writing (@BarbaraHewson) May 24, 2016

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Thomas,_Baron_Thomas_of_Cwmgiedd

Don't expect things to improve if Britain votes to remain in the EU. Expect it to get much much worse and be very very afraid, especially if you are a beta male victim of feminism. You have no one at all to represent your interests because all the leaders of all the political parties are chasing the female vote and are terrified of alienating their female voters.

If you are poor, old and ugly, you already fit the profile of the average paedophile perfectly.

If you are wealthy and successful, you will probably have a queue of lying sluts saying you sexually assaulted them decades ago.  YOUR WEALTH AND SOCIAL STATUS IS NO PROTECTION.

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/why-alpha-male-no-longer-exists-in.html

Bhagavad Gita: "Out of the corruption of women proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory [of established legal tradition ie the right of anyone accused of a crime to a fair trial to establish his guilt *beyond reasonable doubt*], the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3538907/The-feminising-justice-makes-hard-men-charged-rape-fair-trial-writes-human-rights-lawyer-BARBARA-HEWSON.html

By the way, Britain has no alpha male though the are men who have alpha (ie leadership) qualities. If you are a man and have not yet been a victim of feminism, it doesn't mean it won't happen to you, only that it hasn't happened yet.

Oh, and the Directrix of Public Prosecutions is female.

Did the Crown Prosecution Service exceed its powers as John Humphrys was suggesting to Alison Saunders?

The head of the Crown Prosecution Service in London says that the demonization of young women in the media, especially those who’ve been out drinking, is contributing to the low conviction rate in rape cases.

Feminazis hate footballers

http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/calling-out-false-abuse-allegations/18349

One defence lawyer has said that 70 per cent of cases in Crown Courts now are sex cases. The CPS (65 per cent of whose workforce is female) evidently has no concept of age discrimination. It zealously prosecutes offenders ranging in age from 12 to 101.

The more promiscuous the women, the higher the number of rape complaints.

Sweden has the highest rate of reported rape in Europe – about 63 per 100,000 inhabitants. 

http://www.iea.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/files/DP_Supply%20and%20Desire_61_amended_web.pdf

http://www.express.co.uk/comment/expresscomment/379367/Are-some-people-just-too-stupid-to-serve-on-a-jury

Bill Cosby joins my list of men who I think probably did do it but should be let off because the criminal standard of proof will never be satisfied

'16 women have come forward' with allegations that Bill Cosby sexually assaulted them - @jeannewolf #r4today pic.twitter.com/9zMQFPFpPa
— BBC Radio 4 Today (@BBCr4today) November 20, 2014

@inhoclocus @BBCr4today @jeannewolf I are reminded of Stalin's show trials. http://t.co/axcskJivsN
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 20, 2014

@liquoricestick1 @BBCr4today @jeannewolf I support a statute of limitation on sexual assault. http://t.co/0xGS9RzGXU
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 20, 2014

@ginost7 @BBCr4today @jeannewolf I can tell that you are not bothered about such legal niceties such as the criminal standard of proof.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 20, 2014

@Blacknosee @BBCr4today @jeannewolf Why he should not be found guilty even if he was http://t.co/axcskJivsN
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 20, 2014

@mark_mundy @BBCr4today @jeannewolf It is the easiest thing in the world for malicious neurotic women to accuse a man of rape.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 20, 2014

@DavidBalfou @mark_mundy @BBCr4today @jeannewolf Are you claiming that no woman has ever falsely accused a man of rape? Really?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 20, 2014

@STreeTbiLLs @BBCr4today @Saif__Rehan @jeannewolf The rich and famous are more likely to be accused of a historic sexual offence.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 20, 2014

@DavidBalfou @mark_mundy @BBCr4today @jeannewolf http://t.co/Nu6x1CzFWO has a list of false rape accusations made by various women.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 20, 2014

@DavidBalfou @mark_mundy @BBCr4today @jeannewolf Women who make false rape accusations also tend to be sluts, for some reason. @PsychToday
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 20, 2014

In the interests of justice Rolf Harris should be found not guilty even if he was

The criminal standard of proof has been lowered for the worst crime you can be accused of

A statute of limitations for sexual offences

@DavidBalfou @mark_mundy @BBCr4today @jeannewolf Are you familiar with the Biblical story of Joseph and how he was falsely accused of rape?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 20, 2014

@mark_mundy @DavidBalfou @BBCr4today @jeannewolf The more famous you are the more likely you are to be falsely accused of rape IMHO.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 20, 2014

@mark_mundy @DavidBalfou @BBCr4today @jeannewolf I can imagine all the beta males rubbing their hands in glee at nailing another celebrity.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 20, 2014

@mark_mundy @DavidBalfou @BBCr4today @jeannewolf The nasty thing about this is that low status males love bringing down men they envy.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 20, 2014

@mark_mundy @DavidBalfou @BBCr4today @jeannewolf Non-celebrity low status males enjoy seeing high-status males brought low by sluts.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 20, 2014

@DavidBalfou @mark_mundy @BBCr4today @jeannewolf To remind people of the criminal standard of proof is insanity, is it?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 20, 2014

Female-dominated Blibtard Broadcasting Corporation makes presenter apologise 4 speaking the truth. http://t.co/SKTlJwq5Yd @NickConradtweet
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 20, 2014

@judeinlondon @IndyVoices @LucyH_J Rape is about violence and about sluts who don't know their mind and withdraw consent retrospectively.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 20, 2014

@CulliganPA Jimmy Savile is not here to defend himself, is he?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 20, 2014

@nataliecvincent @ElliotBidgood What is so shitty about saying women have to take responsibility for their actions?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 20, 2014

@sallybiddall @BBCNorfolk Most women are sluts and most women are easily offended. Male solidarity no longer exists, it seems.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 20, 2014

@AFTRebecca Which men are offended? Or are they only pretending to be offended to gain sexual access to offended women?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 20, 2014