UAF to get tough on the milquetoasts in UKIP

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/03/04/uaf-conference_n_2804691.html?utm_hp_ref=tw

I can just imagine them melting away under the intimidation and bullying tactics of the Far Left. Nigel Farage is not exactly known for his moral courage either. He would have been more likely to win the Eastleigh election than Diane James, but he was too busy being an MEP to bother becoming an MP, he said.

Perhaps he feared rejection and sent Diane James first, because he didn't want his feelings hurt?

There was once a time when a king would lead his army.   If he was the person most likely to have won the Eastleigh election, then he should have fought for it, but he did not, and instead cowered behind Diane James.

Let's face it, Nigel Farage is not going to do anything much to win anything much between now and the next election.

There is more what passes for political talent within the Conservative Party than in all the Eurosceptic parties put together, that much is obvious.

Therefore tactically, all who despise Cameron must join the Conservative Party to vote him out at the next leadership election.

Remember, politics is a long game and we have to bide our time and take up our respective positions first before we can engage the enemy more closely.

The enemy is of course the filthy Commie Pinkos in the Conservative Party who promote gay marriage.  The error of their ways will be pointed out and corrective action taken against these ideological ignoramuses and traitors.

I do wonder how UKIP will fare when things get tougher once the UAF decide not to bother with the pathetic BNP at all and direct all their energies in a focused campaign of intimidation.  Most of them are elderly, effeminate and middle class libertarian men, unlike the more robust proletarian members of the BNP.  I cannot imagine these soppy libertarians who are incapable of organising a piss-up in a brewery putting much of  a fight over anything at all.  They will just collapse into a contemptible heap of rags and bones the moment the UAF turn up with their knuckle-dusters and bicycle chains chanting "Nazi scum off our streets", I am sure.

I therefore believe that the best thing for Eurosceptics to do is to join the Conservative Party and use their numbers and energy to direct a focused  campaign towards removing the fraud and imposter that is David Cameron, unless of course UKIP beg me to join their party and make me their leader after they have shooed off that moral coward Nigel Farage who even now calls himself a Classical Liberal, ugh.

As I was saying, it will be easier and quicker and easier to trigger off a leadership election within the Conservative Party than win enough seats as UKIP to make the Conservative Party change its mind about pursuing its filthy Commie Pinko policies.

I therefore urge all good Conservatives to join the Conservative Party rather than join the UKIP milquetoasts led by Mr Nigel "Too Little Too Late" Farage.

Join the Conservative Party and await further instructions.  There is a theoretical possibility that I will be able to join you in the Conservative Party if my appeal succeeds against their trumped-up charges. If I do anything at all for the Conservative Party, it will be to make it have formal principles it can state to the world.

Basically, you join the party to have access to MPs whose minds you would be seeking to influence.

When you have done that properly they will get rid of Cameron on your behalf and put someone better in his place, someone who is actually a Conservative, not a jumped-up Etonian piece shit who did not even know who Magna fucking Carter was.  The poor woman died in vain.  

AN ICY LESSON FOR UKIP FROM FINLAND by David Jones

(By David Jones, Independent Pennine Nationalist,
Todmorden, East Lancashire)

I have observed the close (second place) victory in Finland of the True Finns, a populist, right-wing party that has a platform similar to that of the UK Independence Party, in this most liberal of Scandanavian nations the Finnish voters have rediscovered a sense.

This party, which has been in the doldrums of electoral politics and was on the verge of being out flanked by the Finnish SKS-Vahapoulie (sort of their version of our BNP, whose only real asset is their popular leader, the tough guy, of Arctic politics Olavi Mäenpaa has been comfortably holding a seat on Turku City Council for over a decade) and facing political extinction.

Over the last two electoral cycles, True Finns have been rising metiorically however, their success is rare and is only comparable to the success of the "Serbian Radical Party", the Polands "Self Defence Party" and the "Union Attack" Party in Bulgaria, and far outstrips the sucess of Marine Le Pen (of France' FN Party) and even the Vlaams Belang (of the ethnically Dutch portion of Belgium).

So what catapulted this tiny right wing party in Finland most comparable to UKIP to the doors of Helsinki?

Simple, they broke the class divide and directed their appeal at the PRODUCTIVE population of the Finnish society, that is to say they broke with the concept that they must appeal to the middle-class while Mäenpaa's SKS-Vahapoulie appealed to the working-class.

The campaign of the True Finns united the working class tool machinist and his local warehouse owner, it united the timber merchant and the carpenter, the doctor and scientist with the guy that cleaned his windows. They were all behind a common patriotic populist agenda.

There is a lesson for UKIP here!

Many of UKIPs members are, lets be honest, outright snobs who just don't want to be associated with the BNP, it has nothing to do with differences of economic policy which don't matter since neither the BNP or UKIP will be picking the wallpaper for No. 10 any time soon.

Add to the snobbishness the establishment agenda, Nigel Farage is perfectly aware that he will only be able to keep his wealthy support and excessive media coverage is by banging on about how his party are going to destroy the BNP (which is doing a pretty good job at destroying itself), if you don't believe me then listen to him rouse loud cheers from the lefties of the Radio 4 studio audiences while he rants against the BNP on Jonathan Dimbleby's "Any Questions" which he appears to be on every third week.

Well the love affair between the UAF and UKIP was only useful while UKIP was needed to tap the BNP from the middle classes, and now there's no BNP votes left to tap, rest assured that UKIP will come under the same fire from the UAF that the BNP did.

So now we have plenty of despondant ex-BNP looking for a new home, where will they go? Well, not UKIP! Seems UKIP can't stand the smell of the working class BNP and have banned former members from joining UKIP.

Shame really because not only will these lads bring fresh support for them but also will most likely be less likely to leave the party, which rest assured the local wealthy donors will do, the second they see their name in the local paper printed by some National Union of Journalists hack branding them "fascists" and "nazis".

Also, we must encourage local UKIP branch officials to prepare for this and start reaching out
and recruiting solid, working class patriots - don't wait for an order from the top to do that.

Also UKIP officials can drop the use of the colour pink and use purple when they have their Rosettes stamped and literature printed, as well as start taking up a the kind of local community polticking that made the BNP so sucessful here in the Pennines.

Of course to do any of that they must lift the proscription on the BNP, gradually in needed, ie have the ban expire after having been out of the BNP for two years, or put it at the discretion of the local branch.

What are they afraid of anyway? The hardliners have already left and joined the National Front!

If UKIP made the party a no go area for the UAF, who have been infiltrating its youth wing "Young Independence" for years, lifted its proscription on the BNP, recruited some genuine working class and stopped parding around in pink to please the feminists then they could, I'm certain, enjoy the same electoral sucess that their counterparts in Finland have seen.

Why Breivik did what he did and why I did what I did: Liberal Left to blame

Breivik posing with a gun

Me posing with a gun

I was accused of copycatting Breivik by a few of my Facebook friends.  Anyone right-handed who picks up a gun like that would point to the window rather than at a dark corner in the room or indeed at anyone in the room, and that was what I was doing.

Also, the photographer and the furniture of the room would at some stage come into conflict if I pointed it in a different direction.

What am I doing posing with a gun with a Nazi flag behind me anyway, you ask.

I will explain.  That flag has been so fetishised by the Left that it is either treated like a sacred object or hysterically reviled.  It is time to take a more balanced approach.

The war ended 67 years ago.  I think a 50 year prohibition against displaying the Nazi flag in a provocative manner would have been quite sufficient, but it seems the liberal establishment want it for all eternity.

The more you tell people not do something the more they will want to do it.  Remember God telling Adam and Eve not to eat the fruit of his Tree of Knowledge and his Tree of Life?  Remember Pandora being told not to look in that box?  Orpheus was told not to look back.  Ditto Lot's wife. What did they all go and do?

I  have come to the conclusion that God actually wanted to kick Adam and Eve out of  Eden because they were getting under his feet and he wanted the place to himself.   He didn't want to be the bad guy so He found a way of making them do the very thing He told them not to do to give Him the justification for kicking them out like a pair of teenagers eating him out of house and home, playing their  music too loudly and always inviting their friends around.

We now know what the Left have been doing all along.   They fetishised Nazi imagery by having a hissy fit and making everyone have a hissy fit every time they saw it, forbade the use of it - which only made people want to use it more - and then used the desire they created (ie to fetishise Nazi imagery) in rebellious youth as the sign of a growing evil, which they themselves had helped to create by forbidding the criticism of immigration and immigrants, which was always portrayed as RACIST, FASCIST and NAZI so most people became afraid to discuss it.

In the meantime, they made the locals fit only for unskilled manual labour are so useless with their insane leftist social policies by encouraging the worst of women to breed their often disabled and illegitimate offspring whom no sane British employer would employ because they had a crap fatherless upbringing together with a crap education and are lazy  unemployable criminal bastards if they are male, and slut single mums with variously-fathered feral bastards if they are female.

Are you getting the picture now?

British employers in the meantime need labour now so they hire immigrants who are mostly not sluts and bastards (until their offspring are born and bred here and go through the whole shitty British education system  which they will not fix and have been progressively (pun intended) dumbing down for decades, under the aegis of the corrupt female and feminist-dominated teaching profession).

The people who are most affected by these insane and evil Left Liberal Feminist policies are of course the white working classes who have been all but abandoned by their government, who do not care enough about them even to attempt to correct their vicious wicked ways.

To salve their consciences they would rather throw taxpayers' money at them rather than shake their hand or teach them anything worthwhile, because that really would be too much trouble and more than their job's worth.

How long would it take to sort out British education anyway?  More than a term of office, certainly.  That is why successive governments have always swept the vexed question of education and training under the carpet  and also why successive governments have conspired to let more and more immigrants in to replace the useless locals that no sane employer would hire.

Nick Seaton of the Campaign for Real Education http://www.cre.org.uk/ knows what the problem is but won't challenge feminism because he fears it too much, but it is really the only way to take the bull by its horns, to grasp the nettle and to root out the source of Western malaise - feminism, the worship of free love and the deification of the Slut Single Mum who is the source of no-strings sex for men who cannot afford to take a wife and are too mean to pay an honest prostitute for her services.

There is a reason why other cultures have a horror and disgust of promiscuous women while in the West this instinctive moral revulsion has been bred out of it after decades of liberal indoctrination.   Indeed, these disgusting and promiscuous women who have their feral illegitimate children at the expense of the British taxpayer have now been elevated to the status of Sacred Cow.

This is so because most nationalist men have either impregnated an SSM, were SSM-parented or have a partner who is an SSM.   Most of the women they know are SSMs too - their grandmothers, great-aunts, aunts, sisters, nieces, daughters and grand-daughters - for the rottenness is as wide as it is deep.

This is precisely why the Muslims who are already here do not wish to integrate and put on their niqabs when in an earlier age they would have wished to dress in Western fashions to fit in.

But what is the point of fitting into a degenerate race with a degenerate culture?

The best thing to do is to preserve the virtue of your women, threaten to honour kill your daughters if  they ever think of becoming an SSM and hope for the indigenous fuckers to fuck themselves to death so you can take over after they fall off their perches in an excess of slut single mummery.

The cancer of female promiscuity has spread to the brains and guts and balls of almost all British men but it remains the case that the white working classes are the worst affected.   This means that most nationalists are worst affected by this.  So badly affected are they by widespread illegitimacy that even Nick Griffin will not support family values because to do so uncompromisingly would only offend his core supporters, which would never do because his income and status is derived from milking their grievance, without the necessity of giving them a remedy.  It is so much easier to continue blaming the Jews and Muslims than to suggest to them that they might be the author of their own misfortunes.

White working class men, being not the most well-educated, moneyed and moral men knocking around, who are also known for their propensity to violence, tend to react in a way that may be injurious to one's health and electoral success, perhaps, so in a way it is understandable that Nick Griffin would wish to exploit  and flatter them rather than assist them or try to improve their lot by telling them a few home truths.

Politics is after all the business of selling people hope, and Nick Griffin only cares about selling them false hope, while I genuinely wish to change things by telling the truth as I see it and offering a practical solutions, all of which involve the repeal of an Act of Parliament.

It seems impossible to draw anyone's attention to this, so thick is this liberal conspiracy of silence.  Most of the liberal establishment even know who I am, but they are trying their damnedest to ignore me so as to prevent their Sacred Cow who is the Slut Single Mother whom they irrationally worship from being blasphemed against.

My plan is to become quite quite unignorable until enough of them break ranks and decide that they absolutely must interview me when the readers of their publications demand this clamorously enough.

I will make it clear that I have no desire to become a terrorist nor do I wish to gas Jews (some of whom are my best friends).   It is only the potency of these images that will attract liberal eyes in spite of themselves.

Breivik did what he did when he came to the conclusion that participating in the political process is futile.  He observed that once enough  Norweigian voters wised up to what was happening to their country, the Norwegian government would let more immigrants in, give them passports and gerrymander the vote.

Sounds familiar?

Even now, organisations such as UAF, Searchlight and Hope Not Hate regularly intimidate nationalists and pubs who allow nationalists to use their function rooms.

If they make it seem so hopeless that everyone believes that participating in the political process is doomed to failure and disgrace as well as intimidation and violence, then they have only themselves to blame if Britain gets its own Breivik in the years to come.

I have had to go so far to get an interesting photograph of myself taken with Dave and that flag because that is the only way to make the Liberal Left listen.  It was they who drove me to do this, and they have only themselves to blame.

Diagnosis: FEMINISM TO BLAME FOR DECLINE AND FALL OF THE WEST.

Solution: QUESTION, CHALLENGE AND DESTROY FEMINISM AS A RESPECTABLE SYSTEM OF BELIEF.

"It is the greatest injustice to treat unequal things equally."

POSTSCRIPT

It seems from the reaction David Jones and I are getting at
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t881969/ that they are behaving as if I have disrespected their swastika when it was in fact borrowed from Hinduism and Buddhism and tweaked by the Nazis to turn the other way.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Swastika_Society

If anyone has copyright to the swastika it is the people from Asia whence it originated.

It's been over 67 years.  Get over it.   

ANTI-ANTI Muslim march anyone?

http://uaf.org.uk/2010/09/add-your-support-for-6-nov-antiracist-demo/

If the Islamophobes demonstrated against this march, then it would be called an anti-anti-anti Muslim march.

So put that in your pipe and smoke it.

Now, where did I put my black leather trench coat with its BNP rosette, which I shall wear with my niqab to the march? 

The most rousing rendition of Jerusalem I have heard

JERUSALEM - THE BNP ANTHEM

It is now abundantly clear why the Dean of Southwark Cathedral Colin Slee has decided to ban Jerusalem.

It was not because it suddenly came upon him that “those feet in ancient times” which might have walked upon England's Mountains green” belonged to Nazi stormtroopers, but because the BNP have adopted it as their anthem, which they sing before meetings.

As a non-white member of the press invited to attend their East London meeting on 19 April, I must say that it was the most rousing rendition of Jerusalem I have ever had the pleasure of hearing. A soprano voice filled the chorus, and it sent a shiver down my spine. I said as much to the genteel lady in lilac whose voice it was afterwards and she modestly responded that it was nice to know that she had managed to keep her voice. (Some may be keen to point out parallels to the rousing rendition of “Tomorrow Belongs to Me” sung by an earnest Aryan soldier in “Cabaret”, but I am already aware of it.)

Others may wonder how I comported myself, but it just did not occur to do anything else than to stand up, join in and rather enjoy the unusual experience.

HOW RACE HATE LEGISLATION AGGRAVATES RACIAL TENSIONS

Jeffrey Marshall, the London Assembly candidate from East London, introduced himself and mentioned white locals being attacked and intimidated by Muslim gangs and no-go areas. It is for the police to deal with these incidents firmly and fairly and not the fault of peaceable Muslims if the police are reluctant to deal with multi-racial thugs because they fear accusations of racism and demotion.

The race hate legislation does little to help but everything to muddy the waters. If it is illegal to assault anyone, then it is absolutely illegal. Making it an aggravating factor to assault someone on the grounds of their religion or race only creates a sense of grievance and a headache for prosecutors and enforcers, creating a greater potential for crime, disorder and racial and religious resentment.

But will our ruling classes listen, or continue to shut their ears?

RIVERS OF BLOOD - 4O YEARS ON

Nick Griffin the leader was there to rally the troops for their mayoral campaign.40 years ago tomorrow, he began, Enoch Powell made his famous Rivers of Blood speech. Trevor Phillips has, from the Midland Hotel in Birmingham where Powell made his speech, both agreed and disagreed with the gist of what was said. It has been said by some that Powell in fact equipped the liberals with the means to operate a conspiracy of silence, where anyone complaining about immigration would be accused of racism. The consequences of the "black man having the whip hand" had already predicted been in the 50s, and is dealt with in the latest issue of Identity by John Bean, when the implications of the British Nationality Act 1949 were being examined, but it was Powell's colourful language that gave the issue its incendiary properties.

MORAL COWARDICE OF EVERYONE, REALLY

Perhaps it is not so much Powell's incendiary words but the moral cowardice of the mainstream parties (and those who are too afraid of being accused of racism) that we should blame. It cannot be hard to imagine that there must be a Powell-equivalent in every Western nation now complaining about foreigners, who was also ignored at the time.

WHY WE ARE SWAMPED WITH FOREIGNERS

That they were ignored was because it only affected the working classes, and in any case it suited the governments of all hues to sweep under the carpet the awful truth that it is the addiction to the welfare state that makes our secret addiction to cheap foreign labour inevitable.While everyone complains about foreigners from time to time, the situation is most acute in countries where decades of progressive "education" has produced generations of school-leavers who are undisciplined, innumerate, illiterate and unfit for work.

Of course, sorting this out is outside the remit of the short-termist mind-set of those currently in charge, who will always have more urgent matters to deal with, such as how to stay in power by not offending anyone or doing anything much.

The English, Griffin continued, are invisible in East London, the biggest ethnic minority in their own city.

Once, when there were grammar schools, the indigenous working classes of East London might have bettered themselves, but now they are almost without exception condemned to low-pay jobs and obliged to compete with yet more newcomers for jobs, housing and benefits.Because of the demographic changes, the prospects of electoral success are against the BNP in East London but are looking good elsewhere, for it has been noted that many, in Hampstead, Highgate, Kingston, Richmond – the posh people formerly indifferent to the lot of the lower orders - are now supporting the BNP for saying things that none of the other parties dare to say.

TV TRAILERS DR GOEBBELS WOULD BE PROUD OF

The media now appear insatiable in their appetite to discuss immigration, particularly the broadcast media who are doing TV trailers which he says “Dr Goebbels could not have done any better”.

One was of a white man’s face serving as a "white board" being gradually over-written in a variety of foreign languages. Another was of a peaceful British bulldog in a pleasant English park having his territory invaded, urinated and defecated on by non-bulldog breeds, followed by an orgiastic doggy free-for-all that would only produce mongrels.

Nazi propaganda of Jews being portrayed as scurrying rats was nothing compared to this, he said.

THE BNP AS THE POLITICAL CENTRE?

Something has shifted, he declared. The BNP now appear to be the political centre. Gordon Brown has proclaimed the wisdom of “British jobs for British workers”. David Blunkett has described Britain as a “huge coiled spring of racial tension”.

He wondered how Muslims and immigrants must now feel. [To be honest, it did not occur to me to even feel threatened, just glad that the subject is finally being given the airing it deserves. As for the Muslims, it must now be water off a duck’s back to them by now. After all, they have been the victims of unwanted attention ever since 9/11 2001. The ones I know about are genuinely concerned about the future of religious freedom in this country, aware as they are that there may well be a significant minority who probably want to ban Islam, Muslims and mosques.]

We will know things are really wrong when the foreigners go, before being invited to leave by the BNP. In this scenario, food riots rather than race riots will be more likely.
Griffin then pointed out that he had been correct in predicting 18 months before 7/7 2005 that the bombers would come from Bradford.

GRIFFIN PREDICTS "PEACE" WALLS IN 3 YEARS

The liberal media are now practising a form of perestroika, he continued, of glasnost and reform from within, by more honestly debating immigration, but they have now got a tiger by the tail. The UAF “United Against Fascism” – whom Griffin described as “government-sponsored thugs” who use violence to intimidate the BNP no longer use their more unpleasant methods of intimidation, but government ministers still hold meetings with them.

Within 3 years, he predicted British cities will be on fire from Glasgow to London, Liverpool to Hull, and it will not be long before we have “peace” walls, such as those in Londonderry and Belfast, to keep different communities from each other’s throats.

[Protestants and Catholics are the same race in the sense that they are not racially distinct in appearance, and the situation in Northern Ireland has improved rather than deteriorated. I also like to think that problems can be sorted out in time by good policing and sensible laws that are not tainted by the inequalities and confusion created by political correctness.]

GERRYMANDERING

On the subject of gerrymandering, Griffin commented that it is disproportionate for Dame Shirley Porter to be fined £40 million for moving about 40 yuppies into council flats. A clearer case of gerrymandering would be Operation Black Vote which has been going on for longer and used up more of taxpayers’ money.

He concluded by saying that the BNP are “the right party in the right place at the right time” to enthusiastic applause.I did not applaud because I felt it would compromise my journalistic integrity, nor did I contribute to the collection, but I felt, somehow, that I should have, because I had enjoyed the "entertainment" they had laid on.It may be wondered if one can produce rational and consistent reasons to be not anti-Muslim, pro-BNP, pro-Ken and anti-Boris, but I hope I have managed to do this.

A GOOD USE OF OUR SECOND VOTE

The option of casting a second vote of course makes it perfectly possible to vote Ken and BNP, in order to punish our ruling classes who have been sweeping the problem of immigration under the carpet until now, when the media in its wisdom sees fit to raise the issue.

THE EU'S FINGER IN THIS PIE

Doing anything about immigration would of course require the approval of the EU because we are now its vassal state and require its permission to have our own immigration policy. No doubt this is something our ruling classes would also like to stay under the carpet. They have after all conspired to deny us a referendum on this matter on the EU Constitution AKA the Lisbon Treaty.

BORIS THE DORIS - LOOKING A GIFT HORSE IN THE MOUTH

Boris has already said he doesn't want the second vote BNP supporters were proposing to give him. The Tory candidate, has pronounced Islam “the most viciously sectarian of all religions in its heartlessness towards unbelievers” (which pleases BNP supporters), unlike Ken who has been making all the right noises as far as the Muslims are concerned. That he at least could see the folly of invading Iraq, unlike Boris, continues to stand in his favour as far as I am concerned.

What a fool is Boris to look a gift horse in the mouth - another reason why the bungling and warmongering buffoon does not deserve to win!

http://london.bnp.org.uk/?p=87

for their report of the meeting

www.1party4all.co.uk/Home/Account/TopicForm.aspx?topicsId=105
Vote: Should Londoners vote BNP on 1 May 2008 to upset and alarm our ruling classes?