THE VOICE OF REASON
Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
Jo Cox and her ilk would not have hesitated to call anyone who dared complain about immigration a racist. That was always how polarised the debate has been. How long has the immigration debate has been simmering? I would say since Powell made his Rivers of Blood speech in 20 April 1968. The killing of Cox on 16 June 2016 represented the multicultural and multiracial melting pot boiling over. Of course, there have been inner city riots since 1968, but this is the first time an MP actually suffered directly as a result of ignoring the concerns of voters.
Mr Cox’s wife, Jo, is a Labour MP and former aide to Mr Brown’s wife Sarah. Mrs Cox also runs the Labour Women’s Network where she is ‘equalities and discrimination’ adviser.
It was probably Jo Cox who put it into Gordon Brown's head to call anyone who dared complain about immigration "bigoted", as he called called Mrs Gillian Duffy, a Labour member.
Her plea for her constituents to vote remain still has no solutions or words of comfort whatsoever. It is still "Put up and shut up, you plebs. They will keep coming whether you like it or not, whether we're in or out. You have no choice, and you know it. Now shut it."
A dictator is not necessarily a monarch, although a dictatorship could easily turn into a monarchy or even a dynasty.
An example of a constitutional dictatorship would be a dictatorship limited in time eg a term of office or a dictatorship that promises not to violate certain eg Koranic principles.
Surely most people would rather live under a benign dictatorship than a malign and demented matriarchy?
An example of dementia:
1) Childless old crone of a German woman saying to migrants "Come to Germany" without consulting her colleagues and then changing her mind soon afterwards, like a capricious woman who doesn't know her own mind
2) Stupid German woman's male colleagues not daring to criticise or get rid of her (because of their crisis of masculinity)
Feminists are largely spoiled, middle-class white girls unaccustomed to concepts like accountability or responsibility, and courage is a rare sight with this lot.
‘Well, we don’t know that migrants did it,’ said a former Oxford graduate. I said we did know, and it hadn’t been reported for five days. ‘Well the greater good of the community is more important than the rights of the individual,’ she said. I asked her to repeat that so we could really hear what she’d said and was it was OK then, for migrant men to attack women and get away with it?
‘Yes, there was an argument for that,’ she said quite seriously. Another neighbour, from Romania, opined that on no account should the ethnicity of criminals ever be mentioned because it might stigmatise a community. ‘That is far too dangerous,’ he said.
These women probably fantasise about being gang-raped by these migrant Muslim marauders because they are so sick and tired of weak and watery white men who are afraid of them eg the male German politicians who are too afraid to punish Angela Merkel for opening the floodgates.
Who are these feminists who are still going out of their way to be pro-migrant?
The most frequently cited hypothesis for why women fantasize of being forced and coerced into some sexual activity is that the fantasy avoids societally induced guilt—the woman does not have to admit responsibility for her sexual desires and behavior.
Infantilised and indulged women would fit the bill ie Feminist-Sluts who take no responsibility for their egregiously low standards of sexual morality and who have probably watched too much free online porn.
Isn't it disgusting and contemptible that Western men defer to these sluts just because they have the vote?
What is worse than being a stupid slut?
Being a man who is afraid of stupid sluts.
What is even worse than being a man who is afraid of stupid sluts?
Discovering that all the men in your society are afraid of stupid sluts, including Peter Hitchens and Roger Scruton, Britain's only Conservative thinkers that anyone will have heard of.
How do I know they are afraid?
Because Roger Scruton refuses to discuss feminism and says he agrees with everything Christina Hoff Somers says, and she has refused to denounce feminism.
The German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, has said the government must consider changes in the law, after a wave of attacks on women in Cologne on New Year's Eve. Dr Andrea Den Boer is a Senior Lecturer in International Relations at the University of Kent and a specialist in gender and international relations and the causes and consequences of violence against women.
A large demonstration is expected outside the train station in Cologne today by the anti-Islam group Pegida protesting against assaults on women in the city on New Year's Eve. More than half of the known suspects are asylum seekers and the German Chancellor Angela Merkel says she supports changing the law to make it easier to deport migrants convicted of committing crime. We are joined now from the radio car by Dr Andrea Den Boer, Senior Lecturer in International Relations at the University of Kent. She specialises in gender and the causes and consequences of violence against women. Do you believe yjsy there is a link between large numbers of migrants and crime, particularly crimes against women?
ADB:
This is really a new area for us. I've been doing research on high sex ratio societies for the past 20 years with my colleague Valerie Hudson and what we find in many societies is that this transition of young adult men into having a stake in society is one of the important tasks that every society needs to accomplish, and when you have large numbers of men who aren't able to make that transition through employment, marriage and other types of behaviours then these societies are at risk for high levels of anti-social behaviour including formation of gangs, increased substance abuse, violent crime and in particular crimes against women.
MH:
Which societies have you looked at?
ADB:
We've studied for example China and India where of course you have vast numbers of these types of unattached men who engage in this type of behaviour, so in China for example we are looking at a population of 40 million men without corresponding females in their society and their age group. India - similar sorts of numbers, so in these societies that type of behaviour is very easy to observe. We haven't observed the same kind of behaviour being introduced into democratised societies that had a sex balance, so this is rather a new phenomenon, but it seems clear that the migrants in Germany who are present in such large numbers - up to perhaps one million - predominantly men and predominantly young adult males - they seem to be exhibiting the same type of behaviour that we find in these sorts of gangs and marginalised groups within China, India and other parts of the world.
MH [very carefully, and this is why I love Mishal Husain]:
Does that mean that you don't believe that what appears to have happened in Germany is about the culture or the religion that the migrants have come from?
ADB:
It is not predominantly about their culture or religion, no, because our findings hold cross-nationally: young adult males, especially unattached young adult males, who remain on the margins of societies, monopolise violence in every human society.
MH:
Because they are away from their families? They are outside societal norms?
ADB:
They are outside societal norms. What we don't know about the bachelors, the unattached, or the migrants, rather, in Germany and other parts of Europe is whether they are all single. We don't have statistics on their marital status but it seems as if they do mimic these same sorts of behaviour because they are away from their families and therefore are in that same kind of marginalised position and aren't able to transition in society, aren't able to form the normal relationships that would mitigate these behaviours so they are behaving in that same sort of way - as unattached, marginal men.
MH:
I want to play you a clip that we found when we talked to a Syrian migrant called Hassan. He is in Sweden at the moment. He's been there a few months and here's what he said was the attitude of some of his fellow migrants have about women.
[Hassan's voice:]
I am in Sweden. I can do whatever I like. The government here, what can it do? Send me to prison one year? I spend six months in prison, Six months, out. And the prison is better than the camp. [SARDONIC LAUGH] So there is some people thinking like this.
Dr Den Boer, that does suggest that though that is a part that is circumstantial there may be a part that is cultural: "I am in Sweden now; I can do whatever I like."
ADB:
Well, there is evidence in Germany and in many of the refugee centres young men have made similar sorts of points and in fact the mayors of towns all across Germany have warned parents that they need to be aware of some of these cultural differences that these men are encountering women who are not dressed as modestly as they would have been back in their own countries and this may incite further anti-social behaviour among the men. So this may be a factor in their behaviour we are seeing and one of the things that hasn't been fully reported in the press is the way in which violence against women in Cologne that erupted on New Year's Eve is not the only incident that has occurred in the past year. Similar acts of violence - though on a smaller scale - have been occurring up and down Germany with incidences of violence against women in the refugee centres themselves as well as examples of rape and sexual violence in the wider communities where these centres are found.
INTERVIEW ENDS.
NB:
Three times, Mishal Husain - a Muslim herself - asked "Is it Islam that makes these migrants rapey?" and the answer is NO. Being marginalised, jobless and knowing you will never find a decent woman to marry makes men of all races and religions rapey. When you live on the edge, you take your pleasures as they come and live for the day. If you see a girl you can rape, you rape her, because you might as well, because tomorrow you may be in jail, beaten up or dead.
A lack of imagination, denial, a hubristic display of compassion to the wrong people, and it results in Merkel's fall from power, the exit of Germany from the EU, and the beginning of the end of liberal hegemony, thank God.
Would any male German politician have done what she did, and opened the floodgates so casually and thoughtlessly? Of course not.
A male German politician would have known it would not go down well at all, either in Germany or Europe. Indeed, even the liberals of Europe were aghast at her (but they self-censored).
Her husband must be a total jerk too, for taking such little interest in politics he didn't remonstrate with her, or having so little influence over her that even if he had remonstrated with her about opening the floodgates of feral migrants into Germany, it had absolutely no effect at all.
It also means, even more sadly, that European leaders are not fit to lead, especially if they are childless female crones like Merkel.
Now, Europe will rediscover why it was considered a good idea for men to have legitimate offspring as well as an heir and a spare, as well as keep women in their place, or they will be inviting the rest of the world and his dog into your home and you will be paying for the hospitality.
Now, Europe will rediscover why a woman has no place being a leader of men. (What about Maggie Thatcher, you ask? What she did a man should have done, but real men in Britain were already extinct by the time Thatcher came to power in 1979.)
What did this stupid woman think she was doing when she told the migrants to come to Germany? Simon Sheppard would say she was indulging in Affection Beneath. http://www.heretical.com/sgs-2002/wfpim.html
Now, Europe will discover why feminism has gone as far as it can go and must now necessarily retreat or be beaten back like the mad bitch she is.
Now, we will discover if European men are really so spineless, stupid and scared they will let this stupid old crone destroy the EU and destroy Germany.
If and when Merkel is toppled, the EU will break up. The whole fucking liberal project was always on a wing and a prayer anyway.
And if we were to discover that German men will take no action and call her to account for her grave error, the rest of the world will know what to think of Europe and conclude that they are imbeciles and retards, fit only to be invaded and exploited and their women molested.
Will the Americans be crazy enough to have a female President in 2016 though?
Basically, migrant swarms have worked out that German men submit to a stupid old childless female leader who invited them into Germany.
If German men don't get rid of Merkel migrant swarms will keep coming and holding German men in contempt, and of course continue molesting and raping German women.
These migrant swarms come from a land who would never ever dream of putting some stupid childless old woman in charge of men. If she were somehow put in charge, they would get rid of her. If they hadn't managed to get round to ridding themselves of her before she invited migrant swarms into their land, well, they would know what to do with a woman like that ....
Which is worse?
(a) Being a male whose female leader has invited migrant hordes into his country, or
(b) Being a female molested by migrants hordes
The outspoken frontman of these naysayers is Horst Seehofer, the leader of Bavaria’s powerful Christian Democrats. (Seehofer’s party, the Bavarian Christian Social Union (CSU), is technically a separate party from the CDU but a close partner that runs with Merkel’s party in national elections.) From day one of the crisis, Seehofer has vocally opposed Merkel, even going so far as to invite Hungary’s controversial prime minister, Viktor Orbán, to a CSU congress in Bavaria this September and declaring, “If the government doesn’t set limits on immigration, then the people will have to set limits on the government.” When asked how much longer the CSU would stick with Merkel’s current coalition government, he said this was an open question.
By trying not to give succour to racists, the risk is that we end up miserably self-censoring.
The first is that pushing victims under the carpet for the sake of cohesion is dangerous.
Liberals shouldn’t be afraid to ask hard questions.
Do these admissions suggest that the public have been let down by liberal journalists without journalistic integrity trying to protect their liberal ideology and their untenable positions?
After decades of promoting cultural relativism and asserting that people from undeveloped countries can do no wrong, some Westerners have lost an appropriate sense of moral discrimination.
Women were robbed and groped, possibly even raped, by men described as being Arab or North African in appearance. Some Left-wing commentators urged Germans not to jump to conclusions about national origins for fear of stirring up the continent’s far-Right. Their reaction betrayed a liberal sensitivity towards protecting the reputation of ethnic minorities over the safety of the public. Ralf Jaeger, interior minister for North Rhine-Westphalia, said of online chatter: “What happens on the Right-wing platforms and in chat rooms is at least as awful as the acts of those assaulting the women.” That is plainly untrue.
Many Germans, including some of the victims themselves, have accused authorities of a conspiracy of silence over the assaults to stop criticism of the mass immigration policy pursued by Mrs Merkel and her politically-correct supporters. The mainstream media in Germany has, until recently, toed the Government line; a top public broadcaster, ZDF, recently refused to run a segment about a rape case on its prime-time ‘crime-watch’ show because the ‘dark-skinned’ suspect was a migrant. The programme’s editor defended her decision, saying: ‘We don’t want to inflame the situation and spread a bad mood. The migrants don’t deserve it.’
Remember, whether in Germany or Britain, it is white middle class females who find foreigners cute and cuddly while regarding the proles of their own race with barely disguised contempt and disgust. Perhaps this is true of women of all races, but not all races and nations of men have allowed their own women to betray them so easily.
Welfare state discourages beta males from working.
Low birth rate causing labour shortage.
Indigenous labour force uncompetitive lazy good for nothings unattractive to employers because of bad parenting and bad schooling which government has refused to address for decades.
Most women stupid hypocritical sluts who want to trick men into a relationship with a woman who is stupid but kind.
Male leader who will pander to the preferences of female voters at the drop of a hat eg David Cameron.
Female leader falling over herself to display feminine compassion at the expense of her own people eg Angela Merkel.
Female-dominated media constantly pumps out sentimental tripe to encourage mass hysteria over eg a photo of a drowned boy giving stupid sluts the opportunity to show their indiscriminate compassion at the expense of men and the long-term national interest.
Where Emotional Fascism exercised by women operates against men.
Simon Sheppard on Emotional Fascism
In a highly feminine environment females can fall into a belief, then an insistence, that their feelings are precious, invariably valid and paramount, while male sensibilities are dismissed as inconsequential. This has been dubbed emotional fascism. 'My emotions are always correct and sacrosanct. Your feelings don't matter. You're only a man."
If you were a healthy young male migrant, you would know that a country whose women are mostly sluts and whose men are all afraid of sluts where even their supposedly anti-immigration politicians cry on cue to pander to their stupid sentimental slut voters without thinking things through would offer you the most sexual and career opportunities.
The BBC and its female journalists are busily selling the interests of their male licence-fee payers down the river and they are still too fucking stupid to get it. There is no one to protect them either. If you think Nigel Farage is going to do anything other than cry on cue for the benefit of the passing female voter you really should have another think coming.
If I were a migrant I would keep on coming and bring all my mates.
Paul Craig Roberts: " ... American puppet states like Great Britain ... a *total* American puppet state." https://t.co/dIjSWjB4o6
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 23, 2015
Paul Craig Roberts: "Washington is now so reckless, so full of arrogance and hubris, it really is a megalomaniac." https://t.co/dIjSWjB4o6
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 23, 2015
Paul Craig Roberts: "The world is beginning to realise that they are under threat of destruction ..." https://t.co/dIjSWjB4o6
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 23, 2015
Paul Craig Roberts: "Ronald Reagan would think [the US government] had been taken over by the Nazis ... " https://t.co/dIjSWjB4o6
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 23, 2015
Paul Craig Roberts: "The world is beginning to realise ... the incessant lies coming from Washington about war." https://t.co/dIjSWjB4o6
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 23, 2015
Paul Craig Roberts: "What the US has been doing in the 21st century is murdering people ... Murder Inc ... " https://t.co/dIjSWjB4o6
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 23, 2015
Paul Craig Roberts: US would "drive the whole world into war in order 2 try to prevent the rise of Russia n China." https://t.co/dIjSWjB4o6
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 23, 2015
Paul Craig Roberts: "The United States intends to turn Russia into a vassal state just like everybody else." https://t.co/dIjSWjB4o6
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 23, 2015
Paul Craig Roberts: Angela Merkel "is just slow on the uptake ... It's not like she's some kind of genius." https://t.co/dIjSWjB4o6
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 23, 2015
Paul Craig Roberts: "The US are busycausing coups and coloured revolutions in Aremenia, Kurdistan and Uzbekistan." https://t.co/dIjSWjB4o6
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 23, 2015
Paul Craig Roberts: US destabilising Uzbekistan cd cause rift btwn Russia n China cos their interests r different. https://t.co/dIjSWjB4o6
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 23, 2015
Paul Craig Roberts: "The Fed are a special interest group that represents 4 or 5 major banks." https://t.co/dIjSWjB4o6
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 23, 2015
Paul Craig Roberts: The [US] does not have an economic policy that serves the country, business or economic growth. https://t.co/dIjSWjB4o6
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 23, 2015
It took a bloody long time for her to state the obvious, didn't it?
The BNP may be withering on the vine and may already be a spent force, as the media seem to be suggesting, but the basic grievance against liberal hegemony will not go away. Disgruntled voters will find another vehicle or, more to the point, another conveyance will become available for those who want to give the political establishment a piece of their mind.
The BNP is not the only way to bring down the liberal establishment, after all.
