Translate

Showing posts with label mangina. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mangina. Show all posts

Tuesday, 2 February 2016

Female vote will decide the outcome of the EU Referendum and more of them will vote to stay

0810

The president of the European Council Donald Tusk will today put forward a draft text to renegotiate the UK’s membership of the EU. Katya Adler is the BBC’s Europe Editor, Laura Kuenssberg is the BBC’s Political Editor and Dr Gyorgy Schopflin is MEP from the Hungarian governing party Fidesz.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b070drln

From 2:15

Laura Kuennsberg:

... The crucial people will be those in the middle. By Number Ten's calculation there is a chunk of people on one side maybe as many as 40% who are always going to vote to leave the EU and maybe between 30 or 40% on the other side of people who will always vote to stay. What will make the difference when it comes to the referendum is the 20 or 30% of the people - said to be the mushy middle - who will have to be convinced, and those will be the votes who will actually make the difference.

Apparently, 1/3 has already decided YES, 1/3 has already decided NO, and 1/3 are undecided. I bet it is the women who are undecided ending up voting for the UK to stay in because women are risk-averse, can't be bothered to understand how the EU operates or the principle of national sovereignty. Even if they did they are basically as unprincipled as unprincipled men who are easily frightened. People who stand firm against scare stories are people who believe in the principle of national sovereignty. The only way to frighten the undecided into voting to leave is to use migrant swarms to scare them, but it seems many European women want migrant swarms to come so they can work in refugee centres to be with them and can get their mangina running dogs to support them doing so.


Mangina running dogs of feminazis who will perform any act of masculine self-abnegation if called upon to do so. Europe's invaders will know what to do to them when they arrive. 




Nigel Farage and the effeminate and emasculated leave campaigners will be too afraid of alienating the female vote to call feminism out, so we will probably end up having to stay in. Sad, innit?



Europe’s Tragedy: Most Of Its Men Are Feminized Wimps

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/feminism-causes-immigration.html

Female judge grants asylum to Sudanenese migrant Abdul Rahman Haroun, 3 women greet him at prison gates

Simon Sheppard's Sex and Power and migrant swarms

Female BBC journalists' pro-migrant coverage

Ten Reasons Why Females Prefer Alien Males
Why women mind immigration much much less than men

http://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/6876/how-should-i-understand-the-word-corruption-in-this-passage-of-the-bhagavad-gita

It may be argued, of course, that all the major religions are fundamentally patriarchal since they came into being at historical periods distant from our own when human survival was predicated on a strict division of male and female realms. As the hero Arjuna tells the God Krishna in the Baghavad Gita,

‘In overwhelming chaos, Krishna

Women of the family are corrupted,

And when women are corrupted,

Disorder is born in society’

What is more despicable and contemptible than men who are corrupted by and weaker than their corrupted and weak women?

White feminists REPULSED by anti-immigration white proletariat and DON'T CARE what happens to them

Thursday, 28 January 2016

Which is worse: MGTOW or Islamic State?

MGTOW = men who fuck sluts and will never marry

Sluts have turned Western men into MGTOWs and pre-MGTOWs. 

MGTOWs if they could would rather not have anything to do with women at all and have sex with sexbots instead. MGTOWs who want children would pay a surrogate. Can you imagine what the human society would be like after just two generations of this? Yep, this is the road to perdition that feminism has embarked on.




When that finishes, keep it running to learn the full horror of MGTOW.




MGTOW BAD STUFF

Sandman:

"I want to be a part of the game changer which I think will be a combination of sex doll, oculus rift and filmed pornography. So with that being said I'm starting to research into the feasibility of building my own love doll with sensors in it that allows a man to interact with it while wearing an oculus rift headset. And have the actress respond with pre-recorded video footage when you touch the doll while wearing the headset. The sensors built into the doll will connect to the software and be interactive. I believe those three elements working together would be revolutionary. My academic background is in the development of new media technologies. That's what my degree is in and I'm glad that I can finally put that to some use. Isn't it ironic that I want to use ideas taught to me by feminist professors to spread feminism are now going to be used by me to liberate men. I want to call the system "The Liberator Doll." It's not just a doll but an interactive visual, physical and auditory experience. I want to install heaters in the unit to make it feel as warm as human flesh. I want it to have vagina sleeves that are not only easy to wash and maintain but also move and stimulate you better then the real thing. Think of it like taking your car through a car wash. Except in this case it would be a cock wash. The first step to making this happen is getting Oculus rift and making some content for it."


ISLAMIC STATE BAD STUFF









I propose a middle way: making it a requirement for those contemplating marriage to agree a marriage contract to abolish no fault divorce and repealing all totalitarian thoughtcrime feminist legislation viz The Equality Act 2010


The children of Islamic State would mostly not be bastards, but Western nations left only with sluts mating with MGTOWs would have mostly bastards for the next generation, who will be even more bastard and slut with each subsequent generation. 

Of the following, whose long term survival is more assured?

a) a society of mostly of bastards whose parents are SSMs (Slut Single Mothers) who are serially sexually abused by a string of their unfit mother's sexually abusive boyfriends (This social phenomenon together with free online porn and the morally rotten ideology of feminsm is the reason why most people in the West think there is a paedophile under every bush.) 

or

b) a society whose parents are mostly married and whose children are mostly legitimate growing up with their married parents


MGTOW is the terminal cancer you suffer from. Islamic State are just your natural ideological enemies. You are therefore more likely to be killed by the terminal cancer you already have sooner than you are from the harm your natural enemies intend to do to you.

Saturday, 16 January 2016

Judgy Bitch wonders why feminists won't challenge Radical Islam

Feminists are largely spoiled, middle-class white girls unaccustomed to concepts like accountability or responsibility, and courage is a rare sight with this lot. 

http://judgybitch.com/2015/06/09/feminists-dont-challenge-radical-islam-because-real-misogynists-are-terrifying/

‘Well, we don’t know that migrants did it,’ said a former Oxford graduate. I said we did know, and it hadn’t been reported for five days. ‘Well the greater good of the community is more important than the rights of the individual,’ she said. I asked her to repeat that so we could really hear what she’d said and was it was OK then, for migrant men to attack women and get away with it?

‘Yes, there was an argument for that,’ she said quite seriously. Another neighbour, from Romania, opined that on no account should the ethnicity of criminals ever be mentioned because it might stigmatise a community. ‘That is far too dangerous,’ he said.

http://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/jane-kelly-feminist-bbc-would-rather-canonise-bowie-than-admit-the-ugly-truth-of-cologne/

These women probably fantasise about being gang-raped by these migrant Muslim marauders because they are so sick and tired of weak and watery white men who are afraid of them eg the male German politicians who are too afraid to punish Angela Merkel for opening the floodgates.

Who are these feminists who are still going out of their way to be pro-migrant?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_fantasy
The most frequently cited hypothesis for why women fantasize of being forced and coerced into some sexual activity is that the fantasy avoids societally induced guilt—the woman does not have to admit responsibility for her sexual desires and behavior.
Infantilised and indulged women would fit the bill ie Feminist-Sluts who take no responsibility for their egregiously low standards of sexual morality and who have probably watched too much free online porn.

Isn't it disgusting and contemptible that Western men defer to these sluts just because they have the vote?

What is worse than being a stupid slut?

Being a man who is afraid of stupid sluts.

What is even worse than being a man who is afraid of stupid sluts?

Discovering that all the men in your society are afraid of stupid sluts, including Peter Hitchens and Roger Scruton, Britain's only Conservative thinkers that anyone will have heard of.

How do I know they are afraid?

Because Roger Scruton refuses to discuss feminism and says he agrees with everything Christina Hoff Somers says, and she has refused to denounce feminism.

Because Peter Hitchens said he supports feminism.

Why Peter Hitchens is all talk and no trousers

Middle class feminazis who welcome migrants

Female journalists who are pro-migrant

Why Females Prefer Immigrant Males

Now what was the name of that woman who ran an inn and who may have been a prostitute in Jericho who let all the invaders in?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rahab

http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=3691920&partId=1&searchText=cross+lampedusa&page=1

What do you think of this man who praises this "journalism"? Do you think he is a mangina who fancies Emma Jane Kirby?


Below are the words of a civilly-partnered gay man.


There is no information on this male tweeter's profile, but I don't think he is what you might call the average bloke.



Wednesday, 10 June 2015

British scientist who told truth made to resign by feminazis and their mangina running dogs

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/10/nobel-scientist-tim-hunt-female-scientists-cause-trouble-for-men-in-labs

http://www.theguardian.com/education/2015/jun/11/nobel-laureate-sir-tim-hunt-resigns-trouble-with-girls-comments


David Colquhoun - No 1 Mangina Running Dog of Feminazis who have Feminazified British Science





http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/tim-hunt-how-public-shaming-harms-academia/www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/10/nobel-scientist-tim-hunt-female-scientists-cause-trouble-for-men-in-labs#.VXn1MvlViko

David Colquhoun, emeritus professor of pharmacology at University College London, said Hunt’s comments were a ‘disaster for the advancement of women’. But are women scientists really so fragile that they’ll be discouraged by a flippant comment made on the other side of the world? The assumption that they will give up, or never get going in the first place, because of a throwaway sexist sentence just repeats the ‘crying over criticism’ point Hunt is being slammed for making – albeit in an apparently more caring form.

My review of Simon Sheppard's Sex and Power: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sex-Power-Manual-Male-Female-Relations/dp/190124024X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1377715983&sr=8-1&keywords=simon+sheppard+sex+and+power

Thursday, 9 October 2014

Why those who cheer what the tranny potter said about default man have shit for brains



Grammarly Man was so impressed by my answer that he asked me for a snog and wanted me to call him.


Do feminists and their mangina running dogs who cheer on the fall of the patriarchy have shit for brains?



Answers in a comment below, please, on what you think IS/ISIS/ISIL would do to a nation of tranny potters and his default woman, apart from behead them and then sell their default women and default children as slaves.

You could also tell the Tranny Potter in person what  you think about the default man by by going to the Tranny Potter Show, if he is taking questions, and if you don't mind paying £15+ for the privilege of doing so. The best and worst of Britain's Commie Pinko Feminazi Homos, as well as Martin Amis, will be in attendance, as you can see at http://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/grayson-perry-in-conversation-with-miranda-sawyer-tickets-13049384059

If anyone wants to pay for my ticket, I will gladly go and point out a few home truths to the assembled libtards.


Monday, 7 April 2014

Opportunity for UKIP to take a stand against proposals hostile to men accused of a sexual offence

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26917360
Vulnerable witness reforms proposed by Keir Starmer in new 'victims' law'

The Conservatives are understood to be considering their own victims' law.

Excellent opportunity for UKIP to take a stand against this, but will the moral coward Nigel Farage do so? He will probably be too afraid of offending the likes of Star Etheridge, the Disabled Victimhood Czar of UKIP.  http://www.staretheridge.co.uk/

One day he will be old and ugly and look like some dirty old man.  One day some vindictive lying bitch might make some false rape allegation against him, or some attempt will be made to smear him with a false accusation of paedophilia.

Can he really be so sure that it would be safer for him to remain silent on this?

Why should the liberty and rights of men be subverted just because so many irresponsible and promiscuous women invite sex criminals to shack up with them who later go on to sexually attack their fatherless children?

What should these irresponsible and promiscuous women who make bad reproductive choices and who are bad mothers have these privileges over men?

What is this dementia that is slowly taken over the West?
http://www.jw.org/en/publications/books/bible-teach/identifying-babylon-the-great/

What do people think will happen to a society in which the preferences and convenience of immoral women who make bad reproductive choices and choose depraved men as their sex partners reign supreme over everyone else's?

These women (SSMs https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379) whose usually illegitimate children are attacked by their male partners (SPOSSMs - Sex Partners of SSMs) are not the best kind of mothers with the best morals, are they?

Why should the rights of men be subverted for those who are no more than a cancer of society?

It is not unknown for women and children to make false accusations either.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_allegation_of_child_sexual_abuse

Of course, lawyers want this rule because it is more work for them. Lawyers know there will be more work for them because they already know the number of false accusations will increase because it will now be easier for women to make them or for women to get children to make them.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2595891/Law-student-cried-rape-11-times-university-exams-court-hears.html

Rhiannon Brooker made allegations against her boyfriend Paul Fensome of rape and assault because she was doing badly in barrister training.  The flower of British womanhood, is she not? Lots of more like her waiting to bloom and flourish under this proposed change in law by Chief Labour Mangina Keir Starmer.

Be in no doubt about how spoilt, entitled, immoral, capricious, vindictive and unscrupulous most British women are these days and how fearful their men are of them.

Will UKIP ignore this issue and treat it as too controversial and not want to "go there"?

Nigel Farage is a feminist after all.  If you don't want to repeal the Equality Act 2010 and you don't want to abolish no fault divorce and child benefit, you are a feminist.  A feminist believes that it is OK for women to be sluts, and for legislation to protect sluts at the expense of the beta male.

Most Britons are by default feminists because they won't think about any of this until it is too late.

They deserve the laws and government they get.

If paedophiles are mosquitoes, SSMs are stagnant pools of water.  
64:14:
Arberry: O believers, among your wives and children there is an enemy to you; so beware of them. But if you pardon, and overlook, and if you forgive, surely God is All-forgiving, All-compassionate.

Contact UKIP  at http://www.ukip.org/contact and tell them you would be more likely to vote UKIP if they take a stand against this proposed victims' law and promise to repeal the Equality Act 2010 and abolish no fault divorce.

Don't forget to copy me in on this so I can chase it up.  

Sunday, 19 January 2014

Battle of the sexes taking place in the LibDems. May the best man win.

This story highlights exactly why there should be honour amongst thieves and why most women shouldn't be in politics.

Women who cannot fend off unwanted male attentions without crying about it decades later demanding vengeance really should not be in politics.

Men like Nick Clegg who cannot grasp the principle that no man should be convicted of a crime without a fair trial should not be in politics either.

If Lord Rennard has not been convicted of any crime then he should not have to apologise for anything.

It heaps even greater contempt on an already discredited political class.

Not only unprincipled, but stupid as well as ignorant of the most fundamental principle that you would have thought a liberal politician would uphold: the right to a fair trial.

What a pity that the manginas in the LibDems cannot see this, but perhaps this is not too surprising since Nick Clegg is the No 1 Mangina of Britain.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2541954/Henry-VIII-Kim-Jong-Un-Thomas-Cromwell-Nick-Clegg-Lib-Dem-peer-launches-devastating-assault-leader-stance-sex-harassment-scandal.html

http://skypressoffice.co.uk/newstranscripts/murnaghan-190114-interview-lord-carlile-lib-dem-peer-miranda-green-former-press-secr

http://newsatw.com/rennard-could-sue-his-way-back/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NewsTodayOnline+%28News+Today+Online+NewsATW%29

Saturday, 9 March 2013

Mangina of Manginas - Tim Farron, the President of Manginas

Tim Farron, who called the cops of Lord Rennard, alleged to have groped the treacherous  Bridget Harris 20 years ago.  Has he got mangina written all over his face?  What kind of a mangina do you think he is?



http://antimisandry.com/essential/manginas-betrayers-men-13392.html#axzz2Mx97SwTi


Manginas - Betrayers Of Men

Manginas are pseudo-men who fixate their lives on getting a sniff of the female genitalia (figure of speech) at the expensive of others and by betraying real men.

Manginas see women as an ultimate being, places them on a huge pedestal, mind focuses only on sex or the satisfaction of women all the while not giving two bits a damn about his fellow man. Chivalrous and illogical are two definite traits of being a mangina.

A mangina is not a man, and we wouldn't dare honor them by gracing them with the title. A mangina is a pseudo-man who will first and foremost put women above men. This can take the form of buying into sexist stereotypes about men, trolling for pussy, or playing Captain Save-a-ho and reinforcing bad behavior from women.

A Mangina seeks continuous approval from females thereby becoming their servant.

Manginas support women's issues which are against his fellow men. Someone who espouses feminism but is really being suckered into a form of chivalry in which women's interests take precedence over men's. Unaware that they are merely "useful idiots", doing what women want in the vain/hope of getting laid. When his usefulness is over she tosses him out with the rest of the rubbish. Usually can be identified by his spouting the latest feminist clichés. A man who has been p-whipped but doesn't quite realize it. A man who thinks that women will like him if he does what women want (little knowing he is being used and will be dumped for the first alpha male/thug who shambles out of county lockup).

A Mangina is a self-depreciating man who subconsciously hates himself and blindly believes women are superior to him. He has been raised to think masculinity is inherently wrong - perhaps even a genetic/evolutionary/social flaw - and must be corrected by embracing his "feminine side" to the point of losing the very qualities that make him male. He believes women are beautiful, innocent angels and men are filthy animals who need to be controlled. His entire world-view is built on an absolute lie supported and propagated by a Feminised, Liberal culture and morally bankrupt Media. Ultimately his entire life is nothing more than a sad illusion....

He not only betrays himself, friends and family, but all men by sucking up to women in return for favors. A mangina is basically the proverbial Uncle Tom of the male populace. This is why manginas are betrayers and enemies of men.

Types Of Manginas

Here are the types of manginas:

1) The unenlightened. These guys are dangerous, not because they're adverse to our cause, but because they simply do not know any better. These guys have been raised to treat women with respect, to be kind and courteous to women, and when appropriate, to assist and defend her. As I said before, what makes these guys so bad isn't that they have an anti man agenda, so much as it is that they don't know better, and there are so many of them. Imagine that you're the only person in a crowded arena who knows that there is a bomb about to detonate, and you're trying your best to escape while everyone else is standing around doing nothing. That's what these guys are.

2) The horny. Ok now we've crossed into the "dangerous and evil" zone. These guys may not inherently hate men, but they love pussy so much that they are willing to justify anything in the name of pussy. Different from the unenlightened because even the unenlightened realizes that there are some women (bad girls) who you should just stay away from. The horny worships pussy, and will do anything in the name of pussy.

3) The worshipper. We're deep into the "dangerous and evil" zone, and reaching the mentally ill level. Like the horny, these guys will justify anything in the name of pussy. However unlike the horny (or maybe just like the horny), there are no limits on what pussy he'll worship. It doesn't even have to be pussy that he'd fuck. To him, pussy == superior human being. Acts that would be unconscionable to people with common sense, people in level 1, and even some people on the far border of level 2 are completely OK with the worshipper, so long as it's done in the name of pussy. These are the killers and sadists who kill people on their girlfriend's whim.

4) The nut-less. Dangerous. Evil. Mentally ill. Or just a Pathological liar. Basically, Hugo: in this person's mind, all logic, reason, cause, effect, and circumstance is overridden by a hatred for men and the prime directive that women are always right, and always to be obeyed no matter what. No matter what any woman says, this person agrees with them. There is no reasoning, rationing, or convincing this person of anything, no matter how obvious it may be to the rest of the world

The "Hugo" variety, the quasi alpha male who uses feminism to get female attention. Also uses feminism as an excuse to place themselves higher on the male feeding chain by taking the moral high ground as "protector" of women. For ex: politicians who pass laws like VAWA (highly biased, one-sided) which give ever more power to the state.

Any politician that voted for policies such as VAWA and IMBRA. Call it a subspecies of Mangina.

Definition

Man·gi·na
-noun-
1. A women-firster.
2. A pussy-worshipper.
3. A male who behaves or acts toward men in an overly aggressive way once feminist Maxims are questioned.
4. Teacher of lies and half truths.
5. One who believes violence against women is more wide spread than violence against men.
6. The major party of financial transactions to feminist and their misandric programs.
7. A cruel and vicious robber of freedoms.
8. A male lackey of the feminist movement (called a 'male feminist'), who views women as superior to men and always bows down to and agrees with women in an attempt to curry favor.
9. Males who cater to women so that women might like them more.
10. A woman's doormat, personal servant and cuddle buddy.

http://antimisandry.com/essential/manginas-betrayers-men-13392.html#axzz2Mx97SwTi

THE LIBDEMS - a contemptible collection of MANGINAS and gutless wimps not worthy to be called men.   

Friday, 8 March 2013

LibDem Mangina Richard Reeves calls for more housework to be done by men for women

Tim Farron - Liberal MANGINA who called the cops on Chris Rennard  for allegedly groping the treacherous Bridget Harris about 20 years ago

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/9863557/Single-parents-less-effective-at-raising-children-than-married-couples.html

Richard Reeves: has he got MANGINA written all over his face?  Look more carefully and you may yet see the words.  Maybe he is just a pretty face, unlike Chris Rennard. No woman would complain if he touched their knee, I suppose, unless he is fat and bald, which he is not .. yet.  

Richard Reeves, the deputy prime minister's former director of strategy, claimed that while fathers have ''greatly increased'' their contribution to childrearing and housework ''women continue to get the sharp end of the stick''.

He called for breadwinning and childrearing to be shared equally to help improve modern family life and warned it would take more legal equality of rights and greater childcare to help that happen.

A transformation would help single mothers currently struggling to raise their children and ease the problem lower and middle-income families have giving their youngsters enough attention in the face of demanding work, he said.

By 2043, if we are successful, the terms 'career man', 'working father' or 'stay-at-home Dad' will have lost their novelty.

Is this what you want for yourselves by 2043, guys?   Any person with a male sex organ who says yes to this question should immediately castrate himself, cook his sex organ and serve it to his female partner for tea pronto.

Manginas - Betrayers Of Men

Manginas are pseudo-men who fixate their lives on getting a sniff of the female genitalia (figure of speech) at the expensive of others and by betraying real men.

Manginas see women as an ultimate being, places them on a huge pedestal, mind focuses only on sex or the satisfaction of women all the while not giving two bits a damn about his fellow man. Chivalrous and illogical are two definite traits of being a mangina.

A mangina is not a man, and we wouldn't dare honor them by gracing them with the title. A mangina is a pseudo-man who will first and foremost put women above men. This can take the form of buying into sexist stereotypes about men, trolling for pussy, or playing Captain Save-a-ho and reinforcing bad behavior from women.

A Mangina seeks continuous approval from females thereby becoming their servant.

Manginas support women's issues which are against his fellow men. Someone who espouses feminism but is really being suckered into a form of chivalry in which women's interests take precedence over men's. Unaware that they are merely "useful idiots", doing what women want in the vain/hope of getting laid. When his usefulness is over she tosses him out with the rest of the rubbish. Usually can be identified by his spouting the latest feminist clichés. A man who has been p-whipped but doesn't quite realize it. A man who thinks that women will like him if he does what women want (little knowing he is being used and will be dumped for the first alpha male/thug who shambles out of county lockup).

A Mangina is a self-depreciating man who subconsciously hates himself and blindly believes women are superior to him. He has been raised to think masculinity is inherently wrong - perhaps even a genetic/evolutionary/social flaw - and must be corrected by embracing his "feminine side" to the point of losing the very qualities that make him male. He believes women are beautiful, innocent angels and men are filthy animals who need to be controlled. His entire world-view is built on an absolute lie supported and propagated by a Feminised, Liberal culture and morally bankrupt Media. Ultimately his entire life is nothing more than a sad illusion....

He not only betrays himself, friends and family, but all men by sucking up to women in return for favors. A mangina is basically the proverbial Uncle Tom of the male populace. This is why manginas are betrayers and enemies of men.

Types Of Manginas

Here are the types of manginas:

1) The unenlightened. These guys are dangerous, not because they're adverse to our cause, but because they simply do not know any better. These guys have been raised to treat women with respect, to be kind and courteous to women, and when appropriate, to assist and defend her. As I said before, what makes these guys so bad isn't that they have an anti man agenda, so much as it is that they don't know better, and there are so many of them. Imagine that you're the only person in a crowded arena who knows that there is a bomb about to detonate, and you're trying your best to escape while everyone else is standing around doing nothing. That's what these guys are.

2) The horny. Ok now we've crossed into the "dangerous and evil" zone. These guys may not inherently hate men, but they love pussy so much that they are willing to justify anything in the name of pussy. Different from the unenlightened because even the unenlightened realizes that there are some women (bad girls) who you should just stay away from. The horny worships pussy, and will do anything in the name of pussy.

3) The worshipper. We're deep into the "dangerous and evil" zone, and reaching the mentally ill level. Like the horny, these guys will justify anything in the name of pussy. However unlike the horny (or maybe just like the horny), there are no limits on what pussy he'll worship. It doesn't even have to be pussy that he'd fuck. To him, pussy == superior human being. Acts that would be unconscionable to people with common sense, people in level 1, and even some people on the far border of level 2 are completely OK with the worshipper, so long as it's done in the name of pussy. These are the killers and sadists who kill people on their girlfriend's whim.

4) The nut-less. Dangerous. Evil. Mentally ill. Or just a Pathological liar. Basically, Hugo: in this person's mind, all logic, reason, cause, effect, and circumstance is overridden by a hatred for men and the prime directive that women are always right, and always to be obeyed no matter what. No matter what any woman says, this person agrees with them. There is no reasoning, rationing, or convincing this person of anything, no matter how obvious it may be to the rest of the world

The "Hugo" variety, the quasi alpha male who uses feminism to get female attention. Also uses feminism as an excuse to place themselves higher on the male feeding chain by taking the moral high ground as "protector" of women. For ex: politicians who pass laws like VAWA (highly biased, one-sided) which give ever more power to the state.

Any politician that voted for policies such as VAWA and IMBRA. Call it a subspecies of Mangina.

Definition

Man·gi·na
-noun-
1. A women-firster.
2. A pussy-worshipper.
3. A male who behaves or acts toward men in an overly aggressive way once feminist Maxims are questioned.
4. Teacher of lies and half truths.
5. One who believes violence against women is more wide spread than violence against men.
6. The major party of financial transactions to feminist and their misandric programs.
7. A cruel and vicious robber of freedoms.
8. A male lackey of the feminist movement (called a 'male feminist'), who views women as superior to men and always bows down to and agrees with women in an attempt to curry favor.
9. Males who cater to women so that women might like them more.
10. A woman's doormat, personal servant and cuddle buddy.

http://antimisandry.com/essential/manginas-betrayers-men-13392.html#axzz2Mx97SwTi

THE LIBDEMS - a contemptible collection of MANGINAS and gutless wimps not worthy to be called men.   

Monday, 3 December 2012

Why is an organisation apparently devoted to protecting the criminal classes officially a charity?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frances_Crook
Nowhere does it mention in this biography of Frances Crook that she is a mother.

If she ever was married, she would be divorced by now, I would say.

If she had a son, would he be what you might call a mangina?

If she had a daughter, would she now be what you might call an SSM?

If she is a mother, how have her children turned out?

If any children she has have turned out very badly indeed, why should we listen to anything she tells us to do with our criminal classes?

Is it just possible that she regards the criminal classes as her adopted children if she is indeed childless?

If she regards the criminal classes as her adopted children that she must protect and nurture at all costs, how good is this for our criminal justice system and crime prevention?  Not good at all, I suspect.

If this woman thinks the criminal classes are her adopted children then she would want more and more of them so she can become more and more powerful and important to them and through them.    

Is this a form of dangerous neurosis that is dangerous for society to indulge?

Is not her surname perfect for a woman who has for so long vociferously defended the interests of the criminal classes?

http://www.charitycommission.gov.uk/Charity_requirements_guidance/Charity_essentials/Public_benefit/charitable_purposes.aspx

Which heading of charitable purpose does protecting the criminal classes come under?

Surely it is not a charitable purpose to indulge the maternal instincts of a childless woman whose political instincts are well-known to be of  the left?

Surely that is the most toxic combination of all?

http://www.howardleague.org/

HOWARD LEAGUE = THE SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE CRIMINAL CLASSES?

Is the Executive Management Team of the Howard League overwhelmingly female-dominated?

Click http://www.howardleague.org/?id=819 to see what you think!

Is London CPS overwhelming female-dominated?

Click http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/why-is-alison-saunders-of-gender.html to see what you think!

If headteachers in primary schools (who are mostly female) are mostly incapable of dealing with their unruly pupils without calling the cops, is  it because they are incompetent and promoted beyond their ability?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_9774000/9774720.stm


Frances Crook: Arresting children is 'unacceptable'


More than 2,000 primary school children were arrested in England and Wales last year.
Frances Crook, the chief executive of the Howard League for Penal Reform, told Today presenter John Humphrys that this is "very unacceptable" because being arrested is "very traumatic".

"This has very serious implications to the life of a child," she added.

"Most of [the cases] are naughtiness... this is the kind of stuff that should be dealt with by parents or schools."



Is the female-dominated teaching profession responsible for the parlous state of British education?

If it is the case that this country is now fucked by feminism after so many decades of allowing incompetent and neurotic childless women to fuck things up, is it now time to consider remedial action?

Remember, most women are more unquestioningly Left Liberal than men.   It was also the women who voted in New Labour.

Is it now time to consider ways of disenfranchising immoral and irresponsible voters?

It can be done!   Ian Cowie has proposed an excellent idea at http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ianmcowie/100010127/a-tax-based-alternative-to-the-alternative-vote/

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ianmcowie/100020160/is-mitt-romney-right-to-question-representation-without-taxation/

Why don’t we restrict votes to people who actually pay something into the system? No, I am not suggesting a return to property-based eligibility; although that system worked quite well when Parliament administered not just Britain but most of the world. Today, income would be a much better test, setting the bar as low as possible; perhaps including everyone who pays at least £100 of income tax each year.

This would disenfranchise most of the SSMs described at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Are-Slut-Single-Mothers-a-burden-on-the-state/220271251432495?fref=ts  (These are the parasitical women who breed the next generation of badly-parented parasitical welfare-dependants criminals shunned by sensible employers so more immigrants have to be admitted thus destabilising society even further.)

It is now time to put Frances Crook and her ilk on the defensive.  They have messed up the nation's affairs quite badly and for long enough.   It is now time for the men to say enough is enough and take charge again.

Whom would you rather become extinct - The Real Man or the now ubiquitous mangina - the most contemptible kind of man?

http://www.dumpyourwifenow.com/2007/04/06/are-you-a-mangina/


Sometimes referred to as pro-feminist, sell-out or traitor, this pathetic excuse would rather ruin his fellow man’s lives with falsehoods and misinformation.


Often spawned from feminist mothers and raised alongside ‘empowered’ females, the Mangina will often sell his soul in order to attain one-night stands.


In other cases, the Mangina will suffer from a deep self-loathing, which manifests itself into campaigning for all things that will hinder his ‘oppressive’ gender.


The Mangina is not a friend of the Men’s Movement and must be treated with contempt at all times.

Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...