Translate

Showing posts with label Donna Edmunds. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Donna Edmunds. Show all posts

Sunday, 13 April 2014

Political strategist explains how 81 Tory MPs can neutralise UKIP in GE 2015 while shifting Britain sharply to the right

http://s477308942.websitehome.co.uk/parliament/2011/10/the-79-conservative-mps-who-voted-for-a-referendum.html

If these Tory MPs really want an EU referendum, they know which party they should really be in: UKIP.

These Tory MPs who want an EU referendum probably also want to repeal the Equality Act 2010 and abolish gay marriage.

What can they do to punish David Cameron?

Why, threaten to defect to UKIP if he does not agree to propose repealing the Equality Act 2010 in the Conservative Party manifesto for GE 2015, of course.

He would be utterly destroyed if even just half of them did that.

Once the Tories promise to repeal the Equality Act 2010, the legs of UKIP will be completely cut away from under them.  This will be an excellent way to punish Nigel Farage for his cowardice and the way he treated Donna Edmunds.  http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/mar/05/ukip-councillor-donna-edmunds-women-gay-people

What's there not to like about this idea?  We would get a landslide Conservative victory, dispense with the Coalition, and allow UKIP supporters to get what they want without even having to wait for their pathetic little party to win a few miserable seasts.

It can be done, it must be done, it will be done!


  1. Stuart Andrew (Pudsey)
  2. Steve Baker (Wycombe)
  3. John Baron (Basildon and Billericay)
  4. Andrew Bingham (High Peak)
  5. Brian Binley (Northampton South)
  6. Bob Blackman (Harrow East)
  7. Peter Bone (Wellingborough)*
  8. Graham Brady (Altrincham and Sale West)
  9. Andrew Bridgen (Leicestershire NW)
  10. Steve Brine (Winchester)
  11. Fiona Bruce (Congleton)
  12. Dan Byles (Warwickshire North)
  13. Douglas Carswell (Clacton)
  14. Bill Cash (Stone)
  15. Chris Chope (Christchurch)
  16. James Clappison (Hertsmere)
  17. Tracey Crouch (Chatham and Aylesford)
  18. David T C Davies (Monmouth)
  19. Philip Davies (Shipley)
  20. David Davis (Haltemprice & Howden)
  21. Nick de Bois (Enfield North)
  22. Caroline Dinenage (Gosport)
  23. Nadine Dorries (Bedfordshire Mid)
  24. Richard Drax (Dorset South)
  25. Mark Field (Cities of London and Westminster)
  26. Lorraine Fullbrook (South Ribble)
  27. Zac Goldsmith (Richmond Park)
  28. James Gray (Wiltshire North)
  29. Chris Heaton-Harris (Daventry)
  30. Gordon Henderson (Sittingbourne & Sheppey)
  31. George Hollingbery (Meon Valley)
  32. Philip Hollobone (Kettering)*
  33. Adam Holloway (Gravesham)
  34. Stewart Jackson (Peterborough)
  35. Bernard Jenkin (Harwich and Essex N)
  36. Marcus Jones (Nuneaton)
  37. Chris Kelly (Dudley South)
  38. Andrea Leadsom (Northamptonshire S)
  39. Jeremy Lefroy (Stafford)
  40. Edward Leigh (Gainsborough)
  41. Julian Lewis (New Forest East)
  42. Karen Lumley (Redditch)
  43. Jason McCartney (Colne Valley)
  44. Karl McCartney (Lincoln)
  45. Stephen McPartland (Stevenage)
  46. Anne Main (St Albans)
  47. Patrick Mercer (Newark)
  48. Nigel Mills (Amber Valley)
  49. Anne-Marie Morris (Newton Abbot)
  50. James Morris (Halesowen and Rowley Regis)
  51. Stephen Mosley (Chester)
  52. Sheryll Murray (Cornwall SE)
  53. Caroline Nokes (Romsey and Southampton N)
  54. David Nuttall (Bury N)
  55. Matthew Offord (Hendon)
  56. Neil Parish (Tiverton and Honiton)
  57. Priti Patel (Witham)
  58. Andrew Percy (Brigg and Goole)
  59. Mark Pritchard (The Wrekin)
  60. Mark Reckless (Rochester and Strood)
  61. John Redwood (Wokingham)
  62. Jacob Rees-Mogg (Somerset NE)
  63. Simon Reevell (Dewsbury)
  64. Laurence Robertson (Tewkesbury)
  65. Andrew Rosindell (Romford)
  66. Richard Shepherd (Aldridge-Brownhills)
  67. Henry Smith (Crawley)
  68. John Stevenson (Carlisle)
  69. Bob Stewart (Beckenham)
  70. Gary Streeter (Devon SW)
  71. Julian Sturdy (York Outer)
  72. Sir Peter Tapsell (Louth and Horncastle)
  73. Justin Tomlinson (Swindon N)
  74. Andrew Turner (Isle of Wight)
  75. Martin Vickers (Cleethorpes)
  76. Charles Walker (Broxbourne)
  77. Robin Walker (Worcester)
  78. Heather Wheeler (Derbyshire S)
  79. Craig Whittaker (Calder Valley)
  80. John Whittingdale (Maldon)
  81. Dr Sarah Wollaston (Totnes)

I rather fancied the way Andrew Bridgen sent Annabelle Fuller away with a flea in her ear. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/woman-who-claimed-mp-andrew-137526  He would certainly be one of the leadership candidates after David Cameron has been asked to fall on his sword, so to speak and make a strong  case against any more stupid victims' laws.  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26917360

A few quiet words to him will make him leave politics for good, resigning his seat so there will be a by election which Dan Hannan will win ...


Friday, 4 April 2014

The real reason why Godfrey Bloom said Nigel Farage is not up to the job of being UKIP leader

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ukip/10737813/Nigel-Farage-is-not-up-to-the-job-of-Ukip-leader-says-Godfrey-Bloom.html

He should have said it, but did not, doubtless because he feared the wrath of Emma Barnett, who is clearly a prominent member of the matriarchy and who patronised him pitifully throughout that interview.

I know the real reason and it is as follows:

Thu, 14 Nov 2013 13:24:35 +0000
Subject: Equality Act 2010
Dear Godfrey
Would you happen to know what the UKIP leadership's view is on the repeal of the Equality Act 2010?
Kind regards
Claire Khaw

On Thursday, 14 November 2013, 15:56, Godfrey Bloom wrote:
To be brutally frank the UKIP policy is as follows:
1. Leave the EU
2. Strict immigration policy
3. Bring back grammar schools
4. Support fracking, bin wind turbines
All very good. There is nothing else, which is why I left in despair.
Kind regards
Godfrey

Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:40:14 +0000
Subject: Re: Equality Act 2010
If UKIP or any party at all proposed to repeal the Equality Act 2001 and to reintroduce fault into divorce, would you approve?
Kind regards
Claire

Sent: Friday, 15 November 2013, 15:09
Subject: RE: Equality Act 2010
Yes.
Kind regards
Godfrey



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/10741121/Nick-Clegg-v-Nigel-Farage-Hey-ladies-Nigel-Farages-Ukip-wants-to-turn-the-clock-back-for-womens-rights.-Fact.html

Dina Rickman complains:

Mr Farage’s ex-flatmate Godfrey Bloom said in an interview with the Telegraph Wonder Women just this week that women should not expect maternity leave or pay from businesses.

Lest we forget, Mr Bloom had the Ukip whip withdrawn after he called a roomful of women “sluts” and whacked a journalist on the head with a piece of his party’s propaganda - but not when he said small businesses should be able to sack pregnant women. This attitude to maternity rights isn’t libertarian, it’s draconian. As a society, I thought we were past the assumption women need to choose between working and having a family.

I guess you thought wrong, Ms Rickman.  If the Equality Act 2010 has adverse consequences for men, children, the elderly and society in general, then I guess we are not "past the assumption women need to choose between working and having a family". You may think it draconian, but it is also draconian to have thoughtcrime legislation, especially in a society that prides itself on being liberal.

The female journalists of The Telegraph don't like anti-feminism, in their tribal and amoral way, and see fit to insult and denigrate anyone who threatens feminist hegemony.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/mar/05/ukip-councillor-donna-edmunds-women-gay-people clearly demonstrates that Nigel Farage fears the matriarchy and has no intention of kicking it in the goolies.  Repealing the Equality Act 2010 would be the legislative equivalent of kicking feminism in the goolies.  Bloom wants to while Farage dare not because he is a moral coward, and this is the fundamental philosophical disagreement between Bloom and Farage.

There is a certain danger in allowing feminists to have too influential a voice in matters of policy, for they cannot be trusted.  They cannot be trusted because feminism is an ideology that does not ever consider the long term national interest, only the privileging of women simply because they are women, though the heavens may fall.

The male readers of The Telegraph should be put on notice that their interests are being gravely threatened by allowing these self-interested and selfish women to destroy whatever's left of social conservatism.

It is quite clear from http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/if-you-hate-gay-marriage-blame-83-of.html that women and men think and act quite differently.  Why did 83% of female MPs vote for gay marriage while only 48% of male MPs did?  The entire premise of feminism is based on a pernicious lie that will destroy your civilisation.

The principles of feminism are as follows:


  1. Men can have extramarital sex without getting pregnant.
  2. Because men can have extramarital sex without getting pregnant, it is OK for men to have extramarital sex.
  3. Women must be treated the same as men.
  4. Women must be treated the same as men even if they are the ones who get pregnant after having extramarital sex. 
  5. Women are right even when they are wrong. 
  6. Men are wrong even when they are right.
  7. Women are equal to men.
  8. Women are superior to men.
  9. Although women are equal and superior to men, they still need the protection and provision of men.  
  10. Women are to exercise the prerogative of the whore: power without responsibility.


This cancer of society must be surgically excised through the means of


  1. repealing the Equality Act 2010
  2. abolishing No Fault Divorce
  3. abolishing Child Benefit

or the decline and degeneracy of the West will be terminal and irreversible.  

Sunday, 30 March 2014

Anyone who wants to repeal the Equality Act 2010 should send two emails

What I offer to nationalists is a genuine alternative to UKIP, Nick Griffin and Kevin Scott.

I want one of two things from nationalists: (1) my expulsion from the BNP annulled or (2) admission into the BDP.

My policies will appeal to those who:


  1. see the necessity for nationalism to be officially and exclusively civic nationalist.
  2. want to protest against gay marriage.
  3. have had enough of parasitical, irresponsible and promiscuous single mothers eating the nation out of house and home
  4. want a flat rate income tax of 20%
  5. want selective education and grammar schools for their children.  
  6. want to abolish no fault divorce
  7. want to repeal the Equality Act 2010.
  8. think invading Iraq and Afghanistan and imposing regime-change in Libya was wrong in principle and practice.  


What to do if you want to help me promote these policies more effectively is cut and paste the folowing and then send it to BDP and Nick Griffin:


I am a social conservative and am disgusted by Nigel Farage's moral cowardice in refusing to say he would repeal the Equality Act 2010 even though he claims to lead a libertarian party. His treatment of UKIP councillor and MEP candidate Donna Edmunds, who in effect said she would repeal the Equality Act on libertarian grounds, was disgraceful.  http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/mar/05/ukip-councillor-donna-edmunds-women-gay-people

Farage has also said he would not abolish gay marriage if he came to power.  As anyone can see, he is just a walking talking policy and moral vacuum.  

Since the BNP/BDP still exists as a party, you might as well do something useful and do whatever UKIP is too cowardly to do, which is to propose repealing the Equality Act 2010 in its entirety.  

Basically, your line should be "The BNP/BDP supports everything UKIP supports as well as the repeal of the repeal of the Equality Act.  

If UKIP should later announce to our surprise that it does after all support the repeal of the Equality Act, you add something else.

Claire Khaw suggests that you propose the abolition of no fault divorce.  

If UKIP also propose abolishing no-fault divorce, you propose making the agreement of marriage contracts compulsory if people want to marry.  

If UKIP say they support that, you say you support a flat rate income tax of 20%.  

If UKIP say they support that too, you say you support corporal punishment.  

If UKIP say they support corporal punishment, then you say you support capital punishment.

Are you getting the idea now?

Don't you think Claire Khaw is a genius?

Well, make her a member of your party and Director of Communications then!  

If you annul her expulsion from the BNP/admit her into the BDP I will pledge £ x to the party.

If you then appoint her Director of Communications I will donate £ x to the party.  

When you have done so, get in touch with me and I will be happy to make the promised donation.  

I look forward to hearing that you have done the sensible thing to stop nationalism from continuing to be fatally associated with being the ideology of lower class racists, antisemites, Islamophobes and losers.

A Khaw Supporter 

then send to

http://britishdemocraticparty.org/contact/

and

http://www.nickgriffinmep.eu/

Thursday, 27 March 2014

How to get the BNP to support Claire Khaw's ideas

Suggested message to Nick Griffin at http://www.nickgriffinmep.eu/content/contact

Dear Mr Griffin

I am a social conservative and am disgusted by Nigel Farage's moral cowardice in refusing to say he would repeal the Equality Act 2010 even though he claims to lead a libertarian party. His treatment of UKIP councillor and MEP candidate Donna Edmunds, who in effect said she would repeal the Equality Act on libertarian grounds, was disgraceful. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/mar/05/ukip-councillor-donna-edmunds-women-gay-people

Farage has also said he would not abolish gay marriage if he came to power.  As anyone can see, he is just a walking talking policy and moral vacuum.  

Since the BNP still exists as a party, you might as well do something useful and do whatever UKIP is too cowardly to do, which is to propose repealing the Equality Act 2010 in its entirety.  

Basically, your line should be "The BNP supports everything UKIP supports as well as the repeal of the repeal of the Equality Act.  

If UKIP should later announce to our surprise that it does after all support the repeal of the Equality Act, you add something else.

Claire Khaw suggests that you propose the abolition of no fault divorce.  

If UKIP also propose abolishing no-fault divorce, you propose making the agreement of marriage contracts compulsory if people want to marry.  

If UKIP say they support that, you say you support a flat rate income tax of 20%.  

If UKIP say they support that too, you say you support corporal punishment.  

If UKIP say they support corporal punishment, then you say you support capital punishment.

Are you getting the idea now?

Don't you think Claire Khaw is a genius?

Well, make her BNP Director of Communications then!  

If you annul her expulsion I will pledge £ x to the party.


If you annul her expulsion and appoint her Director of Communications I will donate £ x to the party.  

When you have done so, get in touch with me and I will be happy to make the promised donation.  

I look forward to hearing from you.

Your sincerely


A Khaw Supporter 


Wednesday, 19 March 2014

What the BNP can do now that UKIP has revealed itself again to be a policy and moral vacuum

  1. The moral coward Nigel Farage is clearly not going to repeal the Equality Act 2010, even as a libertarian, after the way he treated Donna Edmunds.  http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/mar/05/ukip-councillor-donna-edmunds-women-gay-people
  2. The moral coward Nigel Farage has said he would not annul gay marriages.  http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/mar/18/ukip-would-not-overturn-gay-marriages
  3. The moral coward Nigel Farage has said he would strip Christian weddings of legal status http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ukip/10706379/Nigel-Farage-Ukip-would-strip-Christian-weddings-of-legal-status.html
Clearly, this disgusting moral coward either has no principles or no principles he is prepared to follow. He has bought into PC Liberalism lock, stock and barrel when the country cries out for a political party prepared to at least raise issues social conservatives would wish to have discussed.  

In the meantime the BNP is becalmed and directionless.  

This is what I propose:

PHASE 1

After announcing that the BNP has become officially and exclusively civic nationalist, it invites all the Regional Organisers in (1) North West (2) East Midlands (3) Eastern (4) London (5) North East (6) Scotland  (7) South West (8) Wales (9) West Midlands  (10) Yorkshire (11) South East to reapply for their own jobs. Applicants should all without exception be owners of small businesses and have legitimate children if they have offspring. No Regional Organiser shall be barred for reasons of race or religion.  All Regional Organisers have a vote on policy matters on the Advisory Council.

PHASE 2

Declare the following to be the party's fundamental beliefs:

(a) Nationalism is the ideology of promoting the long term national interest.

(b) Conservatism is the ideology of conserving the long-term national interest.

(c)  The national interest cannot be promoted without respecting the institution of marriage.

(d)  The institution of marriage cannot be respected without the official prohibition of extramarital sex.

(e)  Gay sex, bestiality, necrophilia, incest, adultery and fornication comes under the definition of extramarital sex.

(f) The Equality Act 2010 is totalitarian thought-crime legislation forbidding the exercise of the individual's intellectual faculty to discriminate against those who he may not want to business with and no society that prides itself on being liberal should suffer the existence of thought-crime legislation in his country.

(g)  The nation consists of those who are its citizens regardless of race and religion.

(h)  The national interest is defined as national solvency, control over its own borders, the ability to maintain its defences, the interests of children not yet born, the nation's good standing amongst the international community as well as the maintenance of good standards of education and behaviour.

PHASE 3

Declare the Party's objective to be to say and do what is in the national interest that UKIP are too cowardly to say and do.

PHASE 4

Appoint Claire Khaw Director of Communications so that she can represent the party's new policies and image elegantly, inclusively and attractively on Newsnight.

PHASE 5

Annul Claire Khaw's expulsion so that she can enter and win the leadership contest in 2015.

PHASE 6

Prepare for government in 2020.

Sunday, 16 March 2014

Nationalism, Libertarianism and the repeal of the Equality Act 2010 by Prime Minister Dan Hannan after GE 2015

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26583314

Why is this English Democrat looking like a bus conductor?  Why would the English Democrats think the English would vote for a party with members that look like bus conductors?  Are they retarded or just stupid?
http://englishdemocrats.org.uk/latest-news/item/384-conference/384-conference.html

Is calling their conference "The Revolting English Spring Conference" a good use of the English language to create the right sort of image for English nationalism?

Does holding it in Dartford suggest that those who regard themselves as English Nationalists do not come from the highest strata of English society?

There was a "good chance" that the party would pick up seats at the European Parliament in May's elections, chairman Robin Tilbrook told the BBC.

The party was composed of social democrats, he added.

A good chance that the Englsih Democrats would pick seats in the EU elections?  Really?!?

The English Democrats are a party of Social democrats?  What, like the SDP?  But what about my BNP buddies who joined the English Democrats led by Eddy Butler the ex-BNP National Organiser who was expelled after he failed to trigger a BNP leadership contest?

Surely the last thing these people want is to join a party full of SDP types!

It seems that, having added to his ranks the BNP rejects and finding that they did not add much to his party, he has decided to distance himself from them.

Robin Tillbrook is like someone who is tired of his girlfriend but wants her to break up with him because he is too frightened to tell her it is over. To induce her to break off with him he is doing passive-aggressive things like suggesting and then cancelling dates, turning up late, not doing things he promised to do, and being dull, unkempt, irritating and smelly.

Also, by being self-consciously Centre Left and aping the policies of Alex Salmond and the leftist Sinn Fein, he is clearly showing that that he is on the side of adolescent nationalism rather than grown-up nationalism.

Who best exemplified nationalism?  Why, General Franco, of course.  He at least know that without social conservatism there can be no viable form of nationalism that will survive the corrupting temptations of every age.

The BNP used to see this when it was led by John Tyndall, who wrote THE ELEVENTH HOUR.  Sadly, even these principles have now been salami-sliced into nothingness after Nick Griffin's leadership.  It is almost certain that the BNP manifesto for GE 2015 will say nothing about promoting the institution of marriage.  You can just imagine them all saying "Marriage?  Nah, it ain't for the likes of us. Grammar schools? Wossat ven? Nah, it ain't for the likes of us."

I well remember the BNP website in the 1990s stating that it would repeal the Sex Discrimination Act 1975.

The Sex Discrimination Act has now been consolidated into the Equality Act 2010, which I, as a civic nationalist, believe it is in the national interest to repeal, to  make life easier for small businesses.

Repealing this, as well as abolishing no-fault divorce, would cut the legs off feminism, which I believe is injurious to the long term national interest.

If you call yourself a nationalist and are not prepared to either propose this or discuss this, then you are not what I would call a grown-up nationalist.

On the assumption that all Eurosceptic parties come under the umbrella term of nationalist, I would say that UKIP are certainly not grown-up judging by how Donna Edmunds was forced to apologise by the party for in effect saying she would like the Equality Act repealed.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/mar/05/ukip-councillor-donna-edmunds-women-gay-people

Ukip chair Steve Crowther said Edmunds' comments went "beyond what is acceptable".

"Whilst we are a libertarian party this kind of ultra-libertarianism really goes beyond what is acceptable," he said. "Society has to have rules and it is certainly not Ukip's policy to allow people to refuse service to each other on the grounds of race, sexuality etc. This debate has been unhelpful. It is a matter that will be discussed by our NEC."

It seems no one in politics has said they would repeal the Equality Act 2010 apart from Dan Hannan MEP. He actually said at the launch of Conservatives for Liberty in October 2013 in a crowded function room at the Barley Mow that he would do so for libertarian reasons.  http://con4lib.com/cfl-launches-with-a-roaring-success/

Too bad he is not even an MP.

I think he could easily be MP or even PM after GE 2015.

First, he should stand as an independent Prospective Parliamentary Candidate in Witney.

Of course, if he does the Conservative Party will have a shit fit and expel him.

But if he wins it would mean David Cameron can no longer remain leader of the Conservative Party, since he will no longer be MP.

http://www.bracknellconservatives.org.uk/sites/www.bracknellconservatives.org.uk/files/constitution_0.pdf  (Interestingly, this link has now expired when I looked again on 11 October 2014. Clearly, the Party do not want its members to look at the small print of the party constitution. Why? To avoid having to answer questions as to why it as no principles, presumably. It can now be found at http://www.politicalpartydb.org/party-statutes-archive/united-kingdom/conservative-party/

PART III
LEADERSHIP
10 There shall be a Leader of the Party (referred to in this Constitution as “the Leader”) drawn from those elected to Parliament ...

However, if Dan Hannan does win, I have no doubt that they will annul his expulsion, welcome him back warmly into the bosom of the Party and declare him to be their leader and therefore the PM of Britain.


Dan Hannan - from MEP to PM if he wins Witney in GE 2015 


He has that feline grace and the lean and hungry look ....  Watching him move I sometimes wonder if he did ballet as a boy.  

Watch him tell the Yanks off for living beyond their means at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pW2tJe9Loyw

Wednesday, 12 March 2014

Since UKIP won't be proposing to repeal the Equality Act 2010 in their manifesto, perhaps libertarians can persuade the BNP to do so?

Donna Edmunds - UKIP councillor and MEP candidate 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2573784/Businesses-allowed-turn-away-women-gay-black-people-claims-Ukip-councillor-MEP-candidate.html


The chairman of the BNP has final say in all policy matters.  15 further members of the party leadership have responsibility for various areas of its operations. These executive positions work alongside an Advisory Council, the party's senior policy body, which meets at least three times a year. Its role is to "inspect the party's accounts, ensuring proper conduct of the party's finances, and to act as a forum for the party's leadership to d   iscuss vital issues and carve out the party's agenda".

The Advisory Council

The Advisory Council meets no less than three times a year, and is made up of the National Chairman, Deputy Chairman, the national officers of the party, and the organisers of the party’s most effective regions.   A minutes’ secretary, who keeps records of decisions reached and tasks allocated, also attends, but is not entitled to vote in the event of an Advisory Council vote being required.


SUGGESTED MESSAGE FOR YOU TO CUT AND PASTE TO SEND TO THE BNP ORGANISERS.  (The one in the North West Region will be the most important to Nick Griffin because he is its MEP.)

Dear BNP Organiser on the Advisory Council

This is just something for you to forward to your Chairman about what to include in your next manifesto.  

UKIP will not be proposing to repeal the Equality Act 2010 in their manifesto for GE 2015 so it would be nice if you did.  You could pretend that a significant number of your members are small businesses who would find this cutting of red tape immensely helpful. (Got that?  If you haven't, then go back to the beginning of this paragraph and read it again more slowly.)


While I already know that most of you do not run businesses and are welfare-dependent NEETs who cannot compete against the immigrant worker even in the field of unskilled manual labour because you are mostly singly-parented and badly-educated who have not even heard of the concept of the work ethic, saying that you will repeal the Equality Act in its entirety would make the BNP seem as if it were not a party of complete losers who could never get it together to run a business, much less understand the needs of small businesses. It would also make the BNP seem to be the party of small businesses rather than the party of welfare-dependent NEETs.  (Got that?  If you  haven't, then go back to the beginning of this paragraph and read it again more slowly.)   

This could help you win a few votes from UKIP who are now attracting all the white working class supporters that would in the past have come to you.  That is because these people have finally seen the light now understand what is meant by "Ethno-nationalists must adopt a civic nationalist strategy."  You probably don't understand that, but it just means "To say that you are an ethno-nationalist is tantamount to announcing to the world that you are a racist."  To be seen as the party of lower class racists has done you lot no good at all, has it?  (Got that?  If you haven't, then go back to the beginning of this paragraph and read it again more slowly.)  

It is important that you understand this, because if you don't change the way you present yourself, UKIP will just take the game right out of your hands, while the people left in your party will get more stupid and more racist, more lower class and more slut and bastard, confirming in everyone's minds that nationalism is only for lower class sluts and bastard welfare-dependent NEETs.  (Got that?  If you  haven't, then go back to the beginning of this paragraph and read it again more slowly.)  

While you still exist, the least you can do is try something new for a change, instead of all that pathetic passive-aggressive racist antisemitic Islamophobic whingeing.  

It is not like you people have any better ideas other than whingeing about Muslim grooming.


Regional Contacts
 
North West
northwest@bnp.org.uk 07933 485 877
PO Box 213, Wigton, CA7 7AL

East Midlands
eastmidsro@bnp.org.uk 07795 000 676
PO Box 9128, Lutterworth, LE17 9DD

Eastern
easterninfo@bnp.org.uk 07771 598 227
PO Box 1244, Enfield, EN1 9UF

London
london@bnp.org.uk 07771 598 227
PO BOX 1244, Enfield, EN1 9UF

North East
northeast@bnp.org.uk 07503 779 207
PO Box 105, Spennymoor, DL16 9BJ

Scotland scotland@bnp.org.uk 08448 094 581
PO BOX 213, Wigton, CA7 7AL

South West southwest@bnp.org.uk 078388 180 990
O Box 196, Bordon, GU35 5DH

Ulster ulster@bnp.org.uk 07999 685 038
PO BOX 213, Wigton, CA7 7AL

Wales wales@bnp.org.uk 08448 094 581
PO Box 213, Wigton, CA7 7AL

West Midlands westmids@bnp.org.uk 07709 346 012
PO BOX 5057, Nuneaton, CV11 9FP

Yorkshire yorkshire@bnp.org.uk 08448 094 581
PO Box 105, Spennymoor, DL16 9BJ

South East southeast@bnp.org.uk 08448 094 581
PO Box 213, Wigton, CA7 9SJ

http://www.nickgriffinmep.eu/content/contact
"The chairman of the BNP has final say in all policy matters." Bearing this in mind, it might be an idea to cut and paste the above message and send it to him too.

Claire Khaw praises The Conservative Woman


http://conservativewoman.co.uk/

It is nice to see the issues I have been raising for such a long time finally being discussed here.

I do hope every concerned citizen will take an interest in its ideas, while also demanding the unconditional surrender of feminism.

This will happen once the Equality Act 2010 is repealed and no-fault divorce is abolished.

Who is a feminist?

Anyone who refuses to repeal the Equality Act and to abolish no-fault divorce.

Using this definition, Nigel Farage is a feminist, but not Donna Edmunds.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/mar/05/ukip-councillor-donna-edmunds-women-gay-people

This also means Nigel Farage is not even a libertarian, because any self-respecting libertarian would be expected to find thought-crime legislation abhorrent on principle.  To pretend that to be forbidden from exercise your mind's ability to discriminate between what you want and what you don't want is not thought-crime is laughable, but this is what Nigel Farage is claiming.  It is just too bad for Eurosceptics that UKIP is led by a leader who is in fact a moral coward and a feminist.

Feminism is an unnatural and dysgenic ideology requiring the strong, clever and virtuous to submit to the weak, stupid and venal. Only the imposition of thought-crime legislation like the Equality Act can preserve it.

Can a Conservative woman be a feminist?  I already know the answer, but I leave this to be discussed by its readers and contributors.

Wednesday, 5 March 2014

UKIP disciplines MEP candidate for saying she would repeal the Equality Act 2010

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/mar/05/ukip-councillor-donna-edmunds-women-gay-people

UKIP claim to be a libertarian party.

Is it too stupid or too scared to acknowledge totalitarian THOUGHTCRIME legislation when it sees it?

Clearly.

When will it stop fucking apologising??!!!

The day it stops apologising for the views of  most of its members it will start doing well.  Until then it is  just a mangy cur deserving only to be shooed away like the pariah it is.

The mangy cur that is UKIP.  

STOP FUCKING APOLOGISING AND LOOKING APOLOGETIC, YOU PATHETIC APOLOGETIC FUCKER.
Apologetic Fucker says: "Whilst we are a libertarian party this kind of ultra-libertarianism really goes beyond what is acceptable," he said. "Society has to have rules and it is certainly not Ukip's policy to allow people to refuse service to each other on the grounds of race, sexuality etc. This debate has been unhelpful. It is a matter that will be discussed by our NEC."

If you're not fucking up to the job I'll do it.  

Where do you get your moral courage from?  Obviously not from your mother or your drunk of a father.  



Everything is politics, including religion and theology - Part 1

Not everyone see themselves as political activists.  2:00  "Not everything is politics."  Political decisions 3:00  Idolaters do n...