I complain about Greg Johnson

Sorry about it ending rather abruptly when I was talking about white genocide, but I am sure you get the gist of it. I don't know why that keeps happening.

The bit you missed was me complaining that he says he is too busy to discuss Heidegger and authenticity with me.

UK needs migration because Britons are 'so bloody stupid', says peer who wrote Article 50 of the Lisbon treaty
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/18/pro-eu-peer-lord-kerr-says-uk-needs-migration-because-britons-ar/?fbclid=IwAR2pyzp7uZlT7Lw8nMEj4nYvbo0MUR0E1bY6_9F190ZMKLOemcvXfZjP7vQ

Fathers are sleazy and mothers are lazy: What foreign au pairs REALLY think of British parents
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1299400/Fathers-sleazy-mothers-lazy-What-au-pair-REALLY-thinks-you.html

https://quran.com/24/2

https://quran.com/2/275-285?translations=20

White Nationalism is a busted flush if White Nationalists refuse to discuss what religion to follow post-pogrom
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/11/white-nationalism-is-busted-flush-if.html

Greg Johnson and I talk about sex and his latest book

Why I support marriage and family values

My truth is like a hot knife cutting through the rancid butter of liberal and feminist lies. They are so frightened of these truths that all they can do is pretend not to hear what I say or deliberately misunderstand what I say so they can dismiss me as a Nazi, Fascist, racist, an antisemite and an Islamophobe.

In fact, I have something for everyone: Jews and antisemites, Muslims and Islamophobes, the rich and the poor, the young and the old, but most important of all marriageable men and women of all races and religions in the West who want to become the parents of legitimate children and parent them properly because they want to rear their offspring in optimum conditions. Such people should be privileged over and above those who have no intention or prospect of becoming the married parents of legitimate children or parenting them properly.

Whatever your race, finding someone who will have children with you and stay with you to parent them properly is the only way to continue your race and religion, whatever your race and religion.

Marriage is a human tradition and is what distinguishes humanity from non-human animals.

Don't let the feminists and degenerate sexually liberated liberals trash this institution, or it will be the end of your society, nation and civilisation.

Should saying this be controversial?

All five world religions support marriage for the advancement of civilisation. If you don't believe me, ask yourself if Jews would still be around to get their homeland back after being exiled for 2000 years. Would Jews even be around today if they were all sexually liberated and gaily married since their expulsion by the Romans?

There is nothing liberal about Judaism. Without Judaism there would have been no Christianity or Islam.

Currently, only Muslims stand for traditional values in any significant number.

If God exists, do you think He might send Muslims to punish Christians for 2000 years of idolatry?

If Muslims suffer, could it be because they have distorted their religion by allowing what God has forbidden and forbidding what God has allowed?

If there are now more atheists than there are people who claim to believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the Abrahamic God, the reason is simple: the doctrine of the Trinity is fundamentally absurd and unbelievable. If you believe it, you are perhaps too credulous. If you only pretend to believe it, you are corrupt. Once the Westerner was allowed to deny the Trinity without suffering any consequences, the Westerner began throwing out the baby of Biblical morality with the bathwater of the Trinity. That is why Christianity is kaput. Fortunately, Islam is waiting in the wings.

If Judaism is divine ethno nationalism, then Islam must be divine civic nationalism.

If Islam is "Judaism Lite", then Secular Koranism is "Islam Lite".

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

My political manifesto is the counter revolution to the Sex Revolution, and the return to social and moral order.

On the Amaleks and their values

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-amalekites

http://www.breslov.org/who-and-where-is-amalek-today/

Blame feminism, not Jews

The Jews being a superior race and group (ie more socially cohesive and genetically more intelligent because they understand the necessity of going forth and multiplying albeit within wedlock which is how they keep their traditions, their sense of identity as a people with a purpose and destiny) will be in more of a position to exploit and bully the corrupt gentile, slower on the uptake, crippled by his now established practice of fornication and a culture that celebrates it. That is why the gentile male Westerner is now helpless against the matriarchy he has helped to create, because he accepted the bribe of feminism: fornication and wants to continue to accept it.

Rabbi Sacks, Melanie Phillips, Maurice Glasman and the late Keith Joseph are trying and did try to warn the gentile, but the gentile is more interested in continuing to hate Jews than refusing the bribe of fornication which feminism continues to offer him and which he is too weak, short-termist and cowardly to refuse being the risk-averse materialistic atheist that he usually is.

Right-thinking members of society are social conservatives, which libtards now call the Far Right or Nazi or Fascist or racist or sexist. Libtards are not right-thinking members of society and libtards can be both Jew and gentile. Good Jews are the ones who take the trouble to be social conservative and to warn the gentile of no longer practising social conservatism, bad Jews are libtard and egg the gentile on in his folly and to his doom.

What is social conservatism? It just means supporting marriage - but not "gay marriage" - and practising family values.

Because the gentile Western male no longer has traditions, he only knows emotion, and that emotion is hatred. It is always easier to hate and complain about the symptoms than to cure the disease, and most people take the path of least resistance.

All political ideologies become national religions when they are adopted by the government.

Our religion is PC Liberalism, our culture is sexual liberation, our cultural product is racial degeneracy, national decline and impending chaos.

Good Jews promote bourgeois values, bad liberal assimilated Jews promote degenerate policies resulting in degeneracy.

The Bhagavad Gita:

Out of the corruption of women proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil.

Our crazy culture

Politics is downstream from culture.

Culture is downstream from law.

Law is downstream from morality.

Morality is downstream from religion.

Religion is downstream from politics.

Religion is basically whatever is the political orthodoxy of your time whether or not you yourself believe in God whose principles become the law.

Our laws are PC Libtard.

The culture of patriarchy is marriage and family values, the culture of matriarchy is single parenthood and child sexual abuse.

Guess what our culture is now?

If people deserve the government they get, what kind of government do we deserve?

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/in-politics-fight-breitbart-knew-culture-is-key/article/1154466

Are White People the problem?

What is the problem exactly?

I think it should be re-titled "WHY ARE WHITE PEOPLE HAVING A PROBLEM WITH OTHER RACES IN THEIR COUNTRY?"

The problem is of course immigration, but they white people did it to themselves. If white people did not allow other races into their countries, then they would not be having problems with them now, would they?

If immigration is such a problem for white people, then why don't they just stop it with their democracy if most people have a problem with it? But they can't.

Why not?

Because white people cannot agree amongst themselves what they should do about immigration.

Some white people - the liberal elite - don't have a problem with immigration, but most do. It is the liberal elite who control the media and the media can make most people believe whatever the media want them to believe.

Obviously, if white people want to keep their culture and things the way they are, they have to control immigration.

If they have a problem controlling immigration, they should ask themselves why. Opinion appears to be evenly divided about immigration, but we should bear in mind that is men who are more racist than women because their interests are more directly threatened.

Have you noticed that the lionesses in the lion's harem never help the lion fight when there is a male intruder hoping to usurp him to have access to his harem?

They don't care because they want to have the cubs of the winner even as they know that the usurper if he wins will kill the cubs of the previous incumbent. It is all the same to them.

Are white men like that lion, but forced to be friendly and welcoming to potential usurpers because the lionesses prefer it and he believes in democracy in an environment of indiscriminate universal suffrage?

Then more fool him.

The video only complains about Muslims and Islam, but never mentions the role of democracy, feminism and liberalism in breaking down white men's willingness to protect their interests and culture.

Feminism has utterly emasculated the white man rendering him unable even to defend a principle, let alone his nation. It is doubtful if he any longer understands what a principle is. He probably thinks having principles cramps his style, preventing him from acting on impulse, caprice and expediency. Muslims however have principles because they have religious principles which they are obliged to follow.

What principles ought we to have if we want to have principles just for the sake of having them, like a moral status symbol, to show that we are better than non-human animals who cannot be expected to know what principles are for, let alone have them?

Mine are simply to submit to truth, logic and morality. It seems there are plenty of white men who think they are too good to do that, because they are so white and clever and superior and have no need to obey any rules and can do what they like, whenever and wherever.

You may have noticed that white culture - drug culture, pub culture, the culture of entitlement and the culture of excuses - is not about supporting the institutions of marriage and the family. It is therefore inevitable that it will be replaced by Islam which has a culture of supporting marriage and family values instead of sex and drugs and rock and roll.

So what is the real problem with white people and why can't they fix their problems?

Because they are in denial about the nature of their problems and keep complaining about the symptoms of terrorism and immigration rather than curing the disease of feminism, neoliberalism and neoconservatism, which they cannot do unless they accept the truth, the operation of reason and the nature and purpose of morality.

Because they won't accept the truth, or the conclusions logic leads them towards, or the dictates of morality, they are in denial. Because if they were not in denial, I would have a job in the media or be famous by now, but it is the purpose of the corrupt liberal media to deny my existence however newsworthy I and my ideas are.

When the media of White People finally becomes fit for purpose and reports news rather than suppressing it, there might just be hope for them.

God and the demographic winter to come for the post-industrial societies of the East and West 

If US president welcomes Brexit, why shouldn't I promote independence of Ohio, and Austin, Texas, says Jean-Claude Juncker.

— Jennifer Rankin (@JenniferMerode) March 30, 2017

Are White People the most divided people on earth? https://t.co/F1Eb7Epz8V

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 31, 2017

METROPOLITAN BOROUGH OF CALDERDALE ELECTION OF A COUNCILLOR THURSDAY 25TH OCTOBER 2012

https://www.calderdale.gov.uk/council/democracy/election-information/notices/persons-nominated.html

Demonstrate outside Birmingham Town Hall on 20-21 September at the UKIP conference if you want to support marriage and challenge feminism

Why do they have nothing in their manifesto about supporting the institution of marriage at http://www.ukip.org/content/ukip-policies

Was it an oversight or a deliberate omission?

Or are they just frightened of the female voter like all the rest of those lily-livered politicians in government?

UKIP should at least offer to the voter the abolition of no fault divorce

If they cannot even do that, they are not fit for purpose.   

You could email UKIP at

mail@ukip.org

and ask them why they do not have any pro-marriage policies, but you probably won't.

You could ring them up at 0800 587 6 587 and ask them why not, but you probably won't.

You could visit http://c4m.org.uk/contact-us/ and ask them if they have lobbied UKIP for pro-marriage policies.

You could visit http://www.marriagefoundation.org.uk/ and ask if they have lobbied UKIP for pro-marriage policies.

You could visit http://www.famyouth.org.uk/contact.php to ask if they have lobbied UKIP for pro-marriage policies.

But will you?

All it take is for those three organisations to collectively put pressure on UKIP to promote pro-marriage policies.

Will they do it?

Claire Khaw urges UKIP to promise to end no-fault divorce at conference

No-fault divorce encourages wives to divorce husbands for frivolous and self-serving reasons.  

Men who wise up to what a bad deal marriage is for them will stop marrying.  

When they stop marrying then Britain's problem of widespread illegitimacy will become even more widespread.  

Widespread illegitimacy = degeneracy = criminality = the decline and fall of your race, nation and civilisation

Will UKIP have the balls to arrest national decline and propose this at conference?

Not under Nigel Farage as leader, but certainly under Claire Khaw if she ever became leader.  

How ironic and shaming then that white men no longer know how to be men and are afraid of the worst and most immorally parasitical of their women - the SSMs who cannot be criticised or questioned.  They have to leave it to a female and a foreigner while they cower in dark corners, biting their trembling lower lip, afraid of the displeasure and wrath of their female partners and female bosses.  

Do the men even know why they are so afraid of these women?

Probably not, for they themselves have turned into fearful neurotic demented women in denial.   

Hope Not Hate claim me as an employee to discredit me

http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/blog/article/1927/guess-who-came-to-dinner#.T8ZTB_p-70U.twitter

Now if I really were an informant of theirs they would not wish to expose me.

This must mean they wish to discredit me.

Why though?

Because I am becoming too powerful?  But I flatter myself!

The Newcastle Meeting was a lunchtime meeting.  By the time we finished it would be about tea time.   Jeffrey Marshall and I in fact had dinner at the Thai Restaurant in Grainger Town, and very good it was too.

http://www.atbangkokcafe.co.uk/
Thai Restaurant in Newcastle Chinatown

http://www.atbangkokcafe.co.uk/
Thai Restaurant in Newcastle Chinatown

"They were all there too; Holocaust deniers, perverts, race haters and violent thugs."

They were perfectly pleasant to me and to each other.  Even that Kevin Scott who was being so snippy to me on Facebook was civility and friendliness in person.   I think everyone had a good time.  If these were indeed all Holocaust Deniers, perverts, race haters and violent thugs, they were perfectly charming ones.

The photos I had taken next to Andrew Brons was suggested to me and taken by Karen Allen herself.  I will not have anything said against that lovely lady and her husband Edward.

But I know Hate Not Hate prefer fiction to fact.

David Jones could himself could have attended but he did not due to work commitments.  He was at all times aware of my intention to attend the meeting, and we remain staunch political allies.

I would have thought that Hope Not Hate would be pleased with me that I am trying to make the ethno-nationalists see the light of civic nationalism as the only viable way forward, but not a bit of it.   They carp and criticise, tell lies and make things up when the truth could be had by a simple question directed at me.

As for why I was feeling like "an Old Testament prophet", I was referring to the seeming impossibility of interesting British nationalists in the idea of family values, which must necessarily mean challenging feminism.   Kevin Scott was asking me what was my agenda and why I saw nationalism as a platform for my views.  I was  going to answer him but we were interrupted.  I have actually told him before, but he can't seem to get his head round the fact that I am genuinely serious about challenging feminism, which these days can only be done by a woman, because the disease is now so advanced it could be terminal.

"Out of the corruption of women proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil.  The Bhagavad Gita

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/dave-jones-sets-record-straight-with.html
DAVE JONES SETS THE RECORD STRAIGHT WITH HOPE  NOT HATE 

Proposed Party for Family Values Against Feminism

http://www.facebook.com/claire.khaw/posts/10150715808704424?comment_id=21995512&notif_t=like


Kathleen Watty I rather fancy the Anti-Israel Party. I've thought about it for a while! But I also like the Anti Feminist Party also. It would be worth the registration fee to piss off the lefties.
8 April at 23:23

Leon Georgiou Yes, we should stand candidates again well-known leftists under the banner of the Anti-Feminist Alliance, whose members are free to be part of other parties too. I would join such a party and nominate myself Party Secretary.
8 April at 23:25

Kathleen Watty An anti-feminist party would be superb, I truly believe that. The lefties would LOATHE it!
8 April at 23:28

Kathleen Watty I think it is£200 to register a new party, fuck it I am going to do it! The Anti-Feminist Party! Haha!!

Leon Georgiou You [David Jones] can be Party Chairman (an emphasis on using masculist language!) and Claire can be... I don't know, think of something authoritative and patriarchal!
8 April at 23:31

Kathleen Watty I would happily stand in elections for the Anti Feminist Party.
8 April at 23:33

Leon Georgiou The Anti-Feminist Party could be the British equivalent of the Australiam Family Rights Party.
8 April at 23:38

Kathleen Watty Yes! We must write some blurb for it and get a website.
8 April at 23:46

Kathleen Watty Maybe the Family Values Party is a better title?
8 April at 23:49

Leon Georgiou NO! The Family Values Party can be left for a more serious organization. For now, the Anti-Feminist Party does the job of shocking, provoking, and offending.

Are you interested, Claire?
8 April at 23:51

Leon Georgiou If Claire did express interest in forming a Family Values Party, would you be game? In all seriousness, it could act as a single-issue pressure party willing to work with all other parties to promote socially conservative morality and the nuclear family unit.
Monday at 00:23

Aled Jamieson [a Muslim] Anti Feminist party is a brilliant idea.
Monday at 05:02

Aled Jamieson The ideology should be based on family values and appreciating woman as a mother.
Monday at 05:03

Claire Khaw I think you need to be quite explicit about what you stand for, so the words ANTI-FEMINIST or even THE PATRIARCHY should feature in the name of the party.

How do people feel about The Patriarchy Party?

Family Values is too motherhood and apple pie.
Monday at 09:51

Claire Khaw I am happy to be Directrix of Communications.
Monday at 10:01

Leon Georgiou I would definitely support a Family Values Party existing as a single-issue pressure group offering to work with other parties and individuals. Syncretic, co-operative politics is the way forward. We can, of course, relate the decline of the nuclear family unit to lack of social cohesion, poverty, and crime. Candidates could stand locally in run-down areas. In General Elections, we could offer to campaign with any individual willing to publicly support traditional family values and speak about the problems caused by unmarried single motherhood.
Monday at 11:10

Kathleen Watty The Anti-Slut Party!

Claire Khaw The A S P. I like that ....

Leon Georgiou That could be our byline: "Counter-revolutionaries against feminism, sexual licence, and the destruction of the family!"

Leon Georgiou We must make this a reality! I'm genuinely passionate about this idea! We need to be a thorn in the side of the ruling leftist hegemony! Make them listen to us, even if this entails ridicule and annoyance, as we want to be heard. As a single-issue (in a broad sense) organization, we can afford all negative publicity as it means attention.

We can offer to work alongside and campaign for any candidates of any party standing in elections prepared to address the subject of the declining nuclear family and single motherhood. Where candidates have specifically denounced the traditional family unit or called for an increase in benefits for single mothers, we can stand simply to oppose them and ensure they lose, even if we don't win.

I think our party would be most attractive if we stand in local elections in areas of high unemployment and crime. The reason communities fall apart is the snapping of the spine of the family institution. We must be prepared to state this boldly and address this problem.

Kathleen Watty I am attracted to it because only chavvy whore single mothers can object! When I get some money together next week I will set some aside to get the party registered. New need a name and a brief manifesto. I'm shite at that, but you and Claire are excellent at propaganda!

Leon Georgiou We should stick to either the Anti-Feminist Party or the Family Values Party then. In our manifesto we can devote a section to free speech, in particular against the cultural and political ideas detrimental to the nuclear family unit.

I very much like the Simon Sheppard propaganda. We can have a link to the pamphlet on the party website.


Leon Georgiou We can also look to the Chinese Communist Party to adumbrate our own party constitution.

I also look eagerly forward to the publication of Simon's new misogynistic book! We can plug that on our site too.

Claire Khaw The Party of Patriarchy - P O P ....

Leon Georgiou The Family Values Party works well: the name is anodyne and it encapsulates exactly what we stand for as a single-issue pressure party.

Kathleen Watty Haha I quite like POP!! but most of the steeple will think patriarchy is an Irish bank holiday or something! I really do think the Family Values Party is absolutely perfect.

Kathleen Watty There needs to be Chairman, Treasurer and Nominations Officer.


Leon Georgiou The Family Values Party would be the British counterpart to the Family First Party in Australia. Links between the two could even be forged.

Kathleen Watty I oppose feminism. It has created a nation of weak men and strong women who behave like men, shagging anything that moves. They are a HUGE contribution to the social decay we now see.

laire Khaw I think Kathleen's idea of nationalists standing up for family values is an excellent one. She is the only white woman so far who is prepared to stick her neck out on this one

Claire Khaw If Kathleen is going to do this family values party thing then we can attract a bit of publicity on that. If David MountainMan Jones would join us then that would be even better. If we can free Simon Sheppard in the process ....

Claire Khaw Having me and the BPP involved in this would be newsworthy, I would have thought. It would break new ground for an ethno-nationalist party to actually talk about family values instead of blaming other races.

I mean, FFS, Simon Sheppard is associated with the BPP and the BPP don't even use his stuff!

Leon Georgiou Most nationalists who listen to SS do so politely but in boredom with vapid nods of the head. His arguments are too intellectually refined and speak of something other than niggers and Pakis, so they don't get it. Kathleen Watty likes the man, but unlike me, she feels like yawning and switching off when he starts blathering on about MARKERS. She was particularly annoyed with me in York when SS, true patriarch that he is, instructed her to "sit down as this is going to take a while to explain" after I probed him further on the psychology of flirting.

Maybe nationalists should actually read up on SS's beliefs regarding why White women are impulsively drawn to miscegenating...


Claire Khaw Simon Sheppard is a gift of propaganda, being a political prisoner and all, and you guys are just letting him gather dust on the shelf! Would the BPP like a Press Officer or a Directrix of Communications, perchance?

My recommendations would be to propagate the following messages:

1. The white race can only get on its feet again if it starts promoting and practising family values.

2. It will never ever recover from the malaise besetting it if it does not acknowledge that feminism is the ideology that is preventing the white race from practising family values.

3. Feminism has desecrated the institutions of the family and marriage.

4. All the Abrahamic faiths promote the patriarchy, which feminists see as their duty to undermine.

5. Feminism prevents women from playing their role as mothers and forces them to compete with men, making both men and women unhappy.

6. The quality of their offspring, ie the next generation, suffers because men and women cannot respect each other and stay together long enough to bring their children up properly.

7. This makes white people less competitive compared with other races, because they have lower standards of behaviour, education and training.

8. This makes white employers prefer foreign employees, further disadvantaging the white working classes.


Claire Khaw Ultimately, it is up to the BPP to decide if I am the best person to advance the interests of the white people, and whether they want to be associated with me.


Claire Khaw I suggest they think in terms of publicity rather than race.







The policies I support that nationalists may approve of are:

1. repeal Equality Act

2. repeal the European Communities Act

3. repeal the Human Rights Act

4. repeal the Abolition of the Death Penalty Act

5. split up and sell off the BBC

‎6. Abolish the idea of a racially aggravated offence

‎7. make it a requirement to have a marriage contract before people can get married.

8. abolish Inheritance Tax

9. abolish the civil partnership

‎10. abolish no-fault divorce


I really really really hope something comes out of this.   

Feminism is a Nationalist Concern

If you don't get this, you don't get anything at all.

The only reason why immigrant labour has been let in by successive Tory and Conservative governments is because every country, no matter how wealthy, needs a labour force.

Clearly, women have been too busy competing with men to do their own work properly, which is to bring up the next generation and bring it up well.

Why are there so many Slut Single Mums who have sons who are NEETs and who have daughters who are also SSMs like them?

The quality of British motherhood and the morals of British women are to blame, of course.

But this is something no one wants to acknowledge, even the INDEPENDENT PANEL tasked to discover the causes of the riots we had in England last year, presumably because they too are afraid offending Slut Single Mum PARASITES.

http://www.rediff.com/news/report/tv-social-media-fuelled-london-riots/20120328.htm

We know who is in power by whom we cannot criticise.

But why are we allowing the worst of people - the stupid promiscuous women who breed rioting criminal bastards to dictate social policy?

Is it because we are mad?

Of course feminism should be challenged by nationalists, but they are too emasculated, enfeebled and degenerate to do so now.

They prefer to leave such things to the Muslims when they take over.    

Judith Tebbutt - a sign of things to come for the white woman if the white man refuses to challenge feminism 

The way forward for the English Democrats

The British Empire was an English Empire. The colonised were colonised by the English, not the Scots or the Welsh, who rode on the coat-tails of the English when they acquired their empire.

The idea of Britishness and the incorporation of this national entity called Britain was *entirely* the project and accomplishment of the English, who were once clever and strong enough to do things like this.

Too bad the 21st century Englishman does not even have the historical knowledge or the honesty to admit that to talk up English nationalism is to talk down British nationalism.

The BNP is also an English political party.

It was the English Labour Party who started the slippery slide of devolution into national disintegration. It should be up to the English to sort out this mess, but they are just not up to it now, are they?

They should be ashamed of themselves, but they no longer have any pride and feel no shame.

What is English culture? Stuffing ourselves at Xmas, eating chocolate eggs at East, complaining about foreigners, whingeing about our government, watching footie, TV, sex and shopping.

Oh, and morris dancing for those who fancy this sort of thing.

What is the English psyche? Prevarication, denial, hypocrisy and ingrained cowardice that they no longer have the pride to be ashamed of, endless tolerance of Slut Single Mums and unlimited compassion for the criminal, unproductive, disabled and inadequate . It would be better then if the English go the way of the dodo if that is all they are going to be.

Now that the English have become so contemptibly decadent and emasculated, led by a baby-faced compassionate Conservative who is a warmongering Etonian shit, together with his effeminate and homosexual Cabinet, it is no surprise that the Welsh and Scots want nothing to do with the English.

There are also ancestral hatreds because it cannot be denied that the English did lord it over the Welsh and Scots, and probably did kick them around a bit when they were really Top Dog in the UK.

If the English reformed themselves however, then the Scots and Welsh might want to be British again.  Indeed, the only reason why some of the Muslims become radicalised and start wearing burkas and growing beards is because they wish to dissociate themselves from the depraved and egregious English who are well-known to be worship and be afraid of Slut Single Mums whom they dare not criticise.  They could perhaps reform themselves by uncompromisingly promoting family values supported by marriage, but do these emasculated and effeminate Englishmen dare do this in Slut and Bastard England?

Probably not.

Indeed, Eddy Butler (formerly of the BNP) has told me that I am not being properly English because I uncompromisingly promote family values supported by marriage and regularly criticise Slut Single Mums.

I also know that the manifesto of the English Democrats is drafted in order to avoid criticism and controversy.  This means it is a just the political equivalent of cold porridge.

This is certainly not the kind of effete Englishness any self-respecting foreigner would want to be associated with.   My kind of England would be an England where an Englishman's home is his castle, where eccentric views are tolerated instead of Slut Single Mums and the causes of crime.  My kind of England would an England in which the exercise of free speech is the norm, where people are civil, discreet, sober and proud of being English, not the pitiable Politically Correct sexually incontinent, drink- and drug-addicted obese learning disabled illegitimate, illiterate and innumerate, mentally ill dysfunctional wrecks most of them seem to be these days.

The reason the English are no longer proud of being English any more is because they have nothing to be proud of, except perhaps the cheapness and promiscuity of their females (so cheap and easy that they attract sex predators of all races to prey upon English schoolgirls in English cities with high concentrations of non-white British citizens), the egregious quality of English motherhood and the prevalence of porn, under-aged sex and paedophiles.   Indeed, many English employees and employers now pay the Paedophile Tax that is also called the CRB.

Can Englishmen win their battle against feminist emasculation?  Have they got the guts, brains and balls for it?  Are the English Democrats up to this sort of thing, with their leader who is the antithesis of charisma?

I rather suspect not.   If that is the case then their kind of Englishness is good to neither man nor beast, and certainly not the Englishmen and Englishwomen of England.  

Does Nick Griffin behave like a Jew?

I believe it is possible to have a state religion that successfully safeguards the morals of its citizenry.

Since Judaism is impractical and Christianity is now a dead duck, the only religion left to consider is Islam.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2012/02/rabbi-says-islam-is-religion-of-future.html

Of course atheists will be horrified at the idea, as well as agnostics.

Very reasonably, I ask the people who are hissing and spitting and foaming at the mouth at this very idea to tell me what in the Koran they find objectionable.

Very predictably, they refuse to do so as they continue to hiss and spit and foam at the mouth, because they already know they hate Muslims and Islam and by extension the Koran.

But pride and sloth are deadly sins.

If there is no God, does sin exist?

Of course it does, if sin just means things you like doing that is bad for you, your society, nation and civilisation in the long term.

It is quite clear that atheism is liberalism and liberalism means supporting female promiscuity and by extension promoting the moral degeneracy of the race.

Most people are not philosophers. If they see those around them copulating like dogs in the park after sniffing each other's bottoms, they will think it is OK to do so, and nothing you can say will persuade them otherwise.

That is why promoting a belief in God, even if you do not believe in God yourself is actually NECESSARY.

There will however be no requirement to believe in God as long as we all obey the perfectly sensible commandments of God.

What are they?

They are in the Koran and I find nothing in it that I cannot interpret in a way that I would find reasonable and humane.

But will the people who find my idea of a SECULAR ISLAMIC THEOCRACY objectionable read the Koran so they can tell me which verses they find objectionable?  Will they fuck.

"I hate them and they shouldn't even be here.  Why should I read their fucking book?"

But they are already here, whether they should be or not, and all your governments conspire to let more of them in because they hate you.   They hate the white working classes because they are no longer fit for purpose.  That is why they keep replacing them with foreign workers.

Why are the white working classes so useless?

Because they are mostly sluts and bastards.

Why are they mostly sluts and bastards?

Because we live in a secular society that decrees that no one has a right to be "judgemental" on sexual morality.   That is why the British Slut Single Mum is now beyond criticism.

As I have said, Pride and Sloth are DEADLY sins, but most liberal secularists are too stuffed with pride and sloth to acknowledge this.

They just know that they hate Muslims and Islam and they will certainly not be reading the Holy Book of a  people and religion that they hate and fear.

The only way to defeat Muslims is with the Koran, a Muslim once told me, and the Islamophobes are now too depraved, proud and lazy to do so, even if doing so would save themselves.

The Koran supports:

1. a one-party democracy  23:53-4; 42:13-14

2. a direct democracy  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shura

3. family values  (Do I really need to explain how and why family values supported by marriage has an eugenic effect?)

4. divorce  4:130, 65.1

5. a 20% flat rate income tax  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums

6. capital punishment  6:151  http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/006-qmt.php

7. corporal punishment

8. the legalising of brothels  http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/2010/06/verse-in-koran-implicitly-condones.html  Why we must support the legalisation of brothel-keeping to save British men from what is in effect FORCED MARRIAGE to British SSMs because men can't say no to no-strings sex.   http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/2012/02/without-prostitutes-men-have-no.html

9. a less aggressive foreign policy  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quran_and_violence

But you wouldn't know because you REFUSE TO READ IT because you already "know" that Secularism is better, even as you also know that Secularism encourages your women to be sluts, slut single mums and turns your children into bastards, degrading the quality of the next generation.

If our children are our future then our future is mostly fucked.

What is the problem with the BNP? They want time to stand still, and want, in effect, to turn back time.

Even now they refuse to acknowledge that what they want (to return Britain to the racial composition that existed before the British Nationality Act 1948) is neither practicable nor popular.

However, there is an alternative that could morally regenerate the indigenous population.

If the indigenous population continue to deny that they are morally degenerate (or that it does not matter that they are morally degenerate and that their women are mostly SSMs) then the nation will continue its slide into decline.

I am however heartened to know that quite a few nationalists have converted to Islam, if only out of a sense of individual moral self-preservation.

How do I know that nationalists (who are mostly white working class) are degenerate? You only have to look at the things they say and do when they fall out with each other.

Instead of saying why and how my views are mad and evil, they prefer to speculate on the size and shape of my genitalia (for I am rumoured to be formerly a man), because that is all their lower class minds are fit for.

http://chinwaglondonnationalists.blogspot.com/2012/02/chinese-whispers.html  

It is quite clear that the BNP no longer supports family values because most of its members are the offspring of SSMs and the female partners of its members are mostly SSMs.

It is probably news to them that family values cannot be supported without promoting marriage, and marriage can only be promoted by criticising SSMs.

Yes, I know that would come across as "judgemental" and we can never be judgemental about sexual matters if we are good obedient liberals. If the BNP want to avoid judgementalism in sexual matters then they their thinking is really no different from the liberals whom they fear and hate, but with added racism and xenophobia.

Of course, Nick Griffin will never say anything like what I have said above, even if he did agree with it, because he is just like the LibLabConmen who want the support and votes of the people he dare not offend, who are mostly sluts and bastards that cannot bring themselves to acknowledge that sluts and bastards are bad for Britain.

One of my Facebook friends said - jokingly or not I do not know - that Nick Griffin is really a Jew installed as a state agent to keep nationalism forever on the margins of politics by his egregious leadership.  Could this be because Nick Griffin himself practices family values while affirming the right of the sexually incontinent to desecrate the institutions of Marriage and Family, because it is in his interests to see that a party of mostly illegitimate and illiterate members with low educational and moral standards would make him look effortlessly superior?  I used to dismiss the suggestion that Nick Griffin is a Jew as the ravings of a lunatic, but I am not so sure now.  He certainly behaves like a Jew if Jews do indeed behave in the way described at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2012/01/david-duke-and-his-views-on-jews-why-do.html by David Duke.

Please do not accuse me of being antisemitic.  I am merely pointing out that in the West, Jews, Christians and even Muslims are now just as afraid of the Slut Single Mum as the liberals atheists are, but, when Muslims stay silent, they are are disobeying the Koranic commandment of enjoining good and forbidding evil.

A slut and bastard working class is a working class that is unfit for purpose.  That is why successive governments - both Labour and Tory - have conspired to replace the white working classes with foreign workers (who are not mostly sluts and bastards).

I would be happy to forego the votes of SSMs and welfare scroungers or anyone who cannot acknowledge the truth of what I say or argue against it in a civilised rational way.

Because I am an optimist, I believe it is possible to put this to the people of Britain in a way that they can understand, acknowledge and act upon, because it is only the common sense that the British used to have. 

Would you let your beloved son marry ....

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2092888/Diana-The-Queen-Her-Majesty-Princesss-greatest-supporter-sending-psychiatrist-hosting-family-therapy-session.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frances_Shand_Kydd

1. a woman whose mother committed adultery
2. a woman whose mother was twice divorced
3. a woman whose mother had a drink problem
4. a woman whose mother would be estranged from her daughter at the time of her daughter's death

Blue blood can also be BAD BLOOD, and it is well known that the British aristocracy is now hopelessly degenerate.

When a civilisation rots, it rots from the head downwards.  Now the rot is down to its toes and the stench of public life is acrid with the corruption of the private lives of those who presume to lead us.

What can we expect from the leader of the opposition who did not see fit to marry the mother of his illegitimate children and had to be repeatedly reminded to do so?

What can we expect from the leader of the government who did not see fit to point this out?

The Conservative Party since 2002 has made a point of being nice to Slut Single Mothers. Slut Single Mothers with illegitimate offspring are now called "one-parent families".   http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/theresa-may-there-is-such-a-thing-as-society-6160412.html

In fact when the Conservative Party created the CSA in 1993 it began to officially reward female promiscuity by making it OK not to have a husband before you have a baby, because any man who impregnates a promiscuous female is automatically deemed to want to pay for any baby she has by him when all he wanted was a cheap fuck from a stupid slut.  This is a form of forced marriage, by the way, with all the burdens but none of the pleasures for the male impregnator, but the typical bastard male Briton whose mother is a stupid slut is now too stupid to see this or if he does, too afraid to protest.

Same-sex couples demand the right to call their civil partnerships "marriage" and the Prime Minister is prepared to seriously consider this, to the alarm and distress of the Archbishop of York, who warns that black people these days find the Anglican Church no longer fit for purpose in guiding their morals and leave in droves for the Pentecostal churches.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16771101

If white people had an ounce of racial pride, they would feel humiliation and indignation and then determine to do better, but now they feel mostly indifference and apathy.

We already know that the BNP is not interested in matters theological and can only fix its mind on Muslims, immigration and "easy meat white girls" (as described by Jack Straw) whose indifferent and absent single mothers allow to become the victims of non-white sex predators.
 
The BNP too is just as afraid of criticising Slut Single Mums, if not more, than the LibLabCon it regularly denounces because its members are even more slut and bastard than other parties.   Therefore the BNP are just as guilty of cowardice and hypocrisy, if not more, because its betrayal of the people it claims to represent is deeper and even more reprehensible.

It used to be said that the Church of England was the Conservative Party at prayer, but these days it is the liberal atheist feminist bent on destroying the institution of marriage.

This is what Cameron says about marriage:

Prime Minister David Cameron told the Conservative Party conference last year: "I don't support gay marriage despite being a Conservative. I support gay marriage because I'm a Conservative."

David Cameron is no Conservative.  At any rate he deliberately confuses Conservatism with preserving the status quo, whatever it is, if the challenging of it might prove inconveniently unpopular.   Only unquestioningly tribal Tory loyalists now think Cameron is a Conservative.  This man could not even bring himself to say "Muscular Conservatism" but instead talked about "Muscular Liberalism".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscular_Liberalism

Does this shock you?  Probably not, if you are white, liberal, middle class and have SHIT FOR BRAINS, which the British mostly do these days.

Marriage is a human creation.  Those who believe in God may even call it divine.   Since liberal atheism became the political orthodoxy, marriage has now been systematically desecrated by the liberal political establishment.  However, we desecrate what makes us human (and therefore above lower animals) at our own peril.  Alarmingly, our political establishment is heedless and reckless in its desire to appease the non-taxpaying slut single mums and their bastards who want their fucking fun at the expense of the taxpayer, when, if they were sane and their brains not full of shit, they would realise that the people to appease would be the ones who pay their taxes.  

The British really are a shit for brains people being led by shit for brains politicians with shit for morals with a shit of a future in Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland wallowing in their sexual licence like pigs in mud, and don't let anyone tell you any different.   

Was Diane Abbott racially abusing BLACK people this time?

Jade Knight a black woman who supports marriage and family values and wants a  job in politics.  Sadly , for her, there is no party AT ALL in the UK prepared to uncompromisingly support family values.  She is one smart cookie though.  If I were leader of the BNP I would invite her to join my party immediately.

Diane Abbot, a black racist Labour MP who is on record for racially abusing white people and their ancestors and  who is now apparently racially abusing black people by suggesting that black people do not believe in marriage and family values and that those who do, like Jade Knight, are not doing "the black thing".

Why is a black Tory asking a black Labour politician for a job? If she was hoping for  preferential treatment from Diane Abbot on grounds of race then Diane Abbott rightly gave her short shrift.

She explained to Ms Abbott that she was a committed Christian and had become a conservative with a small ‘c’ after working with disadvantaged black and Hispanic children in America.

‘Many were badly behaved and came from broken homes with no male figure and surrounded by crack addicts,’ she said. ‘I had lived for a while with an aunt and uncle in Georgia in America where most black parents were married and the kids were much better behaved.

‘It convinced me that social conservatism, with its emphasis on family values, is right.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2086722/Work-white-Conservative-What-Abbott-told-Tory-voting-graduate-asked-job.html#ixzz1jXd679Fb

This exchange was revealing in that Diane Abbott appears to be saying:

1. black people do not support family values and are mostly sluts and bastard criminals
2. Labour does not support family values and wish to encourage more sluts and bastards to become welfare-dependent at the expense of the British taxpayer so that Labour continues to maintain its support base.

Where do I get this idea?

Dianne Abbott told Jade Knight, "You’re a black conservative, you don’t do the black thing" because Jade Knight told her she believed that "social conservatism, with its emphasis on family values, is right."

What is "the black thing"?

Being a slut and bastard gangsta, of course!  What else could she have meant?

Perhaps Ed Miliband should sack her this time for bringing the party into disrepute, with her incorrigible racism, both against white people and black people.   

My criticism of single mums may lead to my not being selected as 2012 BNP London mayoral candidate

It would appear that I may not become the 2012 London mayoral candidate because of ideological reasons (my views on single mums) rather than my ethnicity.  I got the impression from meetings that quite a few people liked the idea of my being candidate. They were certainly not hostile. Some were even warm and encouraging, so I will not have it said that, if I were to be rejected as candidate, that it was because of my ethnicity.

In these matters one wonders if one should have been more circumspect about uttering such heresies as criticising single mums in the land where single mums rule with a fist of iron, but I have no regrets.

It is my considered view that widespread illegitimacy and family breakdown has been very very bad for white people, who are the people most affected by the destructive policies of liberalism and feminism.

Singly-parented children tend not to do well educationally and socially, and this makes them less desirable as employees, which means that the jobs go to foreigners who are on the whole not singly-parented and better employees.

One of the main reasons why Muslims won't integrate is because they don't want their children to become singly-parenting, divorced and don't want their children to give them illegitimate and probably feral grandchildren.

I know how distasteful Muslims find female promiscuity and understand completely why they would wish to prevent their own children from suffering the same fate as the white working classes and turning into welfare-dependent single mothers or NEETs.

It would be betrayal of my principles and even the interests of BNP supporters to keep quiet about this when about half the babies born in Britain are now born out of wedlock.

If the BNP is too afraid of telling the truth because it is afraid of single mums and feminists, then it is just as bad and in thrall to the feminazis as all the other parties.

If I have demonstrated this ugly truth by failing to be selected as mayoral candidate because of my views on single mums, then at least I will have made my point.

I suppose there is is no harm however in asking people who think I am right to make this stand on family values supported by marriage - whether they are BNP supporters or not - to email the Chairman

contact@nickgriffin.eu

It has been suggested that there may not even be a 2012 BNP London mayoral candidate at all, because of funding issues. I do not know how true this is, however, and I am sure the funding will come if my stand on the institutions of marriage and family strikes a chord with British people of all races and faiths.

It is not as if anyone else is saying the things I am saying about feckless never-married single mums who are a burden on the state and causing the quality of the national gene pool to decline, together with our educational standards and our moral standing in the world.  And so I find myself stepping dutifully into the breach, even as I know will get shot as the bearer of bad news.  

Why I hate Martin Amis and his gang of Champagne Socialist SCUM

 scum

The execution of Robespierre and his supporters on 28 July 1794

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/nickrobinson/2011/04/ed_miliband_we.html

When I put to him Lord Glasman's suggestion that Labour had been "hostile to the English working classes" he paused and then changed the subject. My sense is that he may well share that analysis.

Fashionable people such as successful and affluent writers and artists ie Champagne Socialists vote Labour.

The concerns of Champagne Socialists are quite at odds with the concerns of the English working classes, whom they heartily despise.

It is the Champagne Socialists who think foreigners are cute and quaint while abhorring the white working classes whom they do not even care enough to advise and warn, whom they prefer to let them rot in their tower blocks and sink estates and their variously-fathered feral children, rather than give them any well-meant advice or the grammar schools and the discipline they so desperately need.

The status-anxiety riddled Champagne Socialists would rather die than admit that it might be nice to have a few grammar schools in their neighbourhood, because they don't want to admit that they cannot afford to pay school fees or live in a neighbourhood with not enough good state schools.


Martin Amis is a Champagne Socialist.


The London literati hate AKA the Champagne Socialists hate and fear the white urban proletariat who support the BNP more than the BNP hate and fear the non-whites. Amis the Anus is one of them. He is the one who would condone the social libertarianism of the Left that does so much damage to people less financially able to deal with the fall out of a broken home ie the white urban proletariat, and the kind of free-fucking social libertarian fucked up family life that killed his sister Sally.

From the Family Amis may we be reminded why Lust and Pride are Deadly Sins.

Lucy Partington his cousin (who ended up being murdered by Fred West) was also a victim of the low and degraded morals of the Amis family too, it would appear.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Amis

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1231509/Was-Martin-Amiss-sister-killed-Sixties-sexual-revolution--drunken-fathers-neglect.html


Because he lives the way he does, he will never go on about family values because that would be so uncool and strait-laced and much too earnest for someone like him obsessed with status anxiety http://www.amazon.co.uk/Status-Anxiety-Alain-Botton/dp/0241142385 and success http://www.amazon.co.uk/Success-Martin-Amis/dp/0140069992.

Let's get rid of the Champagne Socialists then or at least tar and feather them before we send them on their way.

Marie Antoinette most exemplifies Champagne Socialism, which is all about being such a member of the elite that you just don't get it.   Even if you did get, as Louis Theroux should, they still pretend that they don't, because they don't want their friends, colleagues and employers to laugh at them.

To the starving breadless peasants she said, "Let them eat cake."  Well, we all know what happened to her.   

Volunteers could earn 'care credits' for helping others

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11657006

The only way to avoid a lonely old age or being sent to an old folks home to die there largely unvisited and ignored, to be looked after by possibly abusive and indifferent carers, is to have legitimate offspring who have legitimate offspring who are able and willing to support you in your dotage. 

Why the fuck is care in old age a right and not a reward if you have no family and have no money?

That is all part of our Culture of Entitlement, innit.  

Getting credits for helping the elderly is going to be another big fat con.

Do it only if you want to help, not for reward, or be prepared to deal with any feelings of disappointment, bitterness and betrayal when Old Mother Hubbard tells you the cupboard is bare. 

"Is President Obama doomed to failure?" asks the Today Programme on Facebook

http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8975000/8975039.stm

0853
President Obama has largely achieved what he said he would, yet some observers regard him as a failure and he is facing the prospect of significant electoral losses in the forthcoming mid-term elections. Former editor of the Economist, Bill Emmott and Bill Barnard of Democrats Abroad discuss the achievements and failures of the US president.

Obama embodies

1. the loss of confidence of the white race
2. the end of liberal hegemony
3. the decline of the USA

as surely as the assassination of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand came to embody the beginning of WW1.

The Obama Administration is really a signal that America is about to make way for another superpower, and the beginning of the end for liberalism as a respectable political orthodoxy. Shallower historians will see it in racial terms, unfortunately.

Obama got in because, in the whole of America, there was no clearly better candidate that the rotten US political system was capable of producing.

Obama, with his way with words and his ability to cry on cue, touched every liberal heart-string drinking in the last chance saloon.

Liberalism AKA feminism AKA the desecration of family values is an aberration that has delighted us for quite long enough.