Imperialistic wars, a government of national unity and which CEO should become Dictator of Britain

Topics discussed:

10:00  Why men are keener to keep out foreigners than women http://www.heretical.com/sgs-2002/wfpim.html
11:00  Women in denial
13:00  Intersectional victimhood and the acquisition of status through victimhood
13:30  Serena Williams
27:00  Senior Met Police officer could face the sack for using 'racist' 'whiter than white' phrase  https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/senior-met-officer-could-face-the-sack-for-using-whiter-than-white-phrase-a3936041.html
31:00  I defend Cressida Dick for not wanting to get into a row with Peter Whittle about whether Muslim terrorists were inspired by Islam or Islamism. Basically, the official government position is that it is OK with Islam (ie Muslims), but not with Islamism (ie Muslim terrorists).
It really depends on why the Muslim question committed his crime. If he only killed members of his own Muslim household, then he was a "mere" mass murderer.  If he only killed the pets of all the warmongering neocon politicians to make a political point, he would be a terrorist.

If the Muslim question went on a gun rampage for non-political reasons he would still be a mass murderer.

40:00  The Austrian Empire was destroyed after WW1 because of the way it responded to an act of terrorism.

40:26  My answer to Jay's question "Do you think that the Koran causes confusion which makes people kill?" The short answer is that politics and religion have always been contentious and people have killed and continue to kill each other over political and religious disagreements believing themselve to be the ones more sinned against than sinning.
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/09/islam-and-islam-based-terrorism.html

45:00  Neoconservatism and neoliberalism
Neoconservatism calls for the invasion of Muslim countries, neoliberalism says it is OK that the people whose countries you have bombed come to your country.

52:00  Boris Johnson sets out his Tory leadership vision... in America https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/boris-johnson-sets-out-his-tory-leadership-vision-in-america-a3935956.html

58:00  The government should have declared a state of emergency to implement Brexit

1:02:00  Nationalism is not necessarily military aggression and obviously we should pick our fights carefully.

1:02:45  WW1 and WW2 wars of imperialism between two rival European powers.

1:04:00  Canadian Mark Carney is the Colonial Administrator of the UK on behalf of the globalists.

1:07:00 The Virtue of Nationalism by Yoram Hazony

1:13:00  Holocaust Denial

1:04:00  Weimar Republic

1:24:00   Holocaust Memorials  https://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/destinations/europe/united-kingdom/articles/britain-first-holocaust-memorial-to-open-in-london/

1:26:00  Paris Commune  https://www.britannica.com/event/Commune-of-Paris-1871

1:26:35  Herbert Asquith and the cancelled election of 1915  https://www.historytoday.com/ian-garrett/general-election-1915-0

1:27:00  Berlin to Bagdad Railway  https://carlcymrushistoryblog.wordpress.com/2014/04/18/the-berlin-baghdad-railway-and-the-outbreak-of-world-war-one/

1:28:00  Nations and empires: empires always go international

1:30:00  A War Memorial that sugested that WW1 was dedicated to the Glory of God , and not Belgian neutrality or dog in the manger imperialism.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/09/first-world-war-centenary-memorial-restorations-britain-conservation-public-monuments

1:43:00  Empire is an objective measure of human achievement.

1:50:00  What does "Classical Liberal" mean anyway?

2:00:00  One party state

2:10:00  Tim Martin of Wetherspoons

2:20:00  Bernard Jenkin  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3375077/Friend-nudist-Eurosceptic-MP-claims-victim-naked-smear-tactics-leading-role-Vote-Leave-campaign.html

Hi Claire Khaw,
Thank you for submitting your video appeal to YouTube. After re-reviewing your video Imperialistic wars and a government of national unity, we've decided to leave the restrictions on your video in place.
Our commitment to you
We take your videos and the YouTube community feedback seriously. We provide all uploaders with an option to appeal any removal or restriction of their videos. When an appeal is submitted to us, we work quickly to review the content and take appropriate action, including restoring videos that have been mistakenly removed.
Yours sincerely,
- The YouTube Team
29 Sep at 07:21

The lessons and questions of history

Those who fought in the war started in 1914 did not know it would be subsequently called the Great War or that it would eventually be called WW1.

If Asquith had known what he thought was a little skirmish would have become WW1, would he have declared it?

This is the question that should be asked in history lessons.

Why is the white Western male politician so militarily belligerent?

Surprisingly, one of the leading forces against Obama’s so-called long war is the candidate decried by the Clinton camp, and most of the rest of the world, as a “loose cannon.” It’s Donald Trump, a man who can hardly be accused of being a candidate for racial tolerance, particularly regarding the Middle East. Last week, responding to ongoing calls for war, the presumptive Republican nominee said of Kristol, “This poor guy, all he wants to do is go to war and kill people.”

http://sputniknews.com/analysis/20160531/1040569704/obama-kristol-kagan-pentagon-war.html#ixzz4AHDs28UR

Margot Asquith was a great lover of the outdoors, a keen horsewoman, with "no fear at all in defying gender conventions".

She once even rode her horse up the steps and into the hall of her family's London townhouse, causing the horse to rear up, bring the rider and the hall's crystal chandelier crashing down.

"Every inch the fin de siècle woman, she smoked and swore self-consciously and copiously, danced with the Prince of Wales, sat on Tennyson's knee and had a poem written to her by him," Prof Cowman says.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-21772657

Margot Asquith sounds like she was quite a handful.

A man who has lost control at home can seek to dominate elsewhere. This displacement idea can be extended to a national leader, perhaps an American president. He must have a great lust for power to attain such a position and it is not surprising that once installed he wishes to “flex his muscles” and exercise some real power. However his options for doing so at home are limited. His masculine instinct to dominate and subdue may be exercised far away instead.

It may be said (with justification, but which is beyond the scope of this article) that the stated reason for embarking on war is nearly always a pretext. The ‘trigger event’ can be manipulated for this purpose, or a random spark may ignite an entirely unrelated charge.

http://www.heretical.com/sgs-2014/fem-war.html

Is it just possible that the wives of neocons are terrible termagants?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Termagant#.22Termagant.22_as_a_ranting_bully_and_a_shrewish_woman

The wife of neocon Robert Kagan is Victoria Nuland.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_Nuland

 
 

41st minute "the warmongering trouble-making women": Victoria Nuland, National Security Adviser and UN Ambassador  https://t.co/MkA1IoFCir

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 31, 2015

Susan Rice, Victoria Nuland and Samantha Power - what have they got in common? From 41st minute.  https://t.co/MkA1IoFCir via @usawatchdog

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 31, 2015

There are two kinds of neocons:

1. those who know exactly what they are doing
2. those who are neocons by default because they love bombing Muslims and will go along with any plan to bomb Muslims anywhere in the world

Are these trouble-making women Lady Macbeth? Are Muslim countries invaded by NATO Duncan?  Is Banquo's ghost ISIS? Neocons are certainly Macbeth. I like to think of Donald Trump as Macduff and of myself as one of the three witches ....

How Britain lost its world empire and why sexual morality matters

@grumpydip @Otto_English @DavidJo52951945 @edlnews @MrRae1000 I thought WW2 was rather unnecessary, if truth be told.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) April 20, 2016

@grumpydip @Otto_English @DavidJo52951945 @edlnews @MrRae1000 When you think about it, it was the British who lost the most after WW2.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) April 20, 2016

@ScottAJBlake4 Why has British foreign policy been crap for so long? Because voters don't care about foreign policy, being stupid/ignorant.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) April 20, 2016

@grumpydip @Otto_English @DavidJo52951945 @edlnews @MrRae1000 If not for Britain declaring war on Germany there wd hv bn no tripartite pact.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) April 20, 2016

@grumpydip @Otto_English @DavidJo52951945 @edlnews @MrRae1000 If not for the tripartite pact, the Japanese would not have taken Singapore.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) April 20, 2016

@grumpydip @Otto_English @DavidJo52951945 @edlnews @MrRae1000 If the Japanese had not taken Singapore, the British would not have lost India

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) April 20, 2016

@grumpydip @Otto_English @DavidJo52951945 @edlnews @MrRae1000 If Britain had not lost India, the rest of its colonies wd hv remained British

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) April 20, 2016

@grumpydip @Otto_English @DavidJo52951945 @edlnews @MrRae1000 Because Britain declared war on Germany, it lost her world empire.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) April 20, 2016

@grumpydip @Otto_English @DavidJo52951945 @edlnews @MrRae1000 When you think about it, it was Britain who in fact started two World Wars.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) April 20, 2016

@grumpydip @Otto_English @DavidJo52951945 @edlnews @MrRae1000 In WW1, it was again Britain that declared war on Germany.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) April 20, 2016

@grumpydip @Otto_English @DavidJo52951945 @edlnews @MrRae1000 It has been said by historian A J P Taylor WW2 was a continuation of WW1.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) April 20, 2016

@grumpydip @Otto_English @DavidJo52951945 @edlnews @MrRae1000 What was WW1 about as far as Britain was concerned? Belgian neutrality.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) April 20, 2016

@grumpydip @Otto_English @DavidJo52951945 @edlnews @MrRae1000 Treaty of London *1839* guaranteed Belgian neutrality. https://t.co/tFAMUwMTAV

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) April 20, 2016

@grumpydip @Otto_English @DavidJo52951945 @edlnews @MrRae1000 It would be reasonable to infer that Belgian neutrality was just an EXCUSE.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) April 20, 2016

@grumpydip @Otto_English @DavidJo52951945 @edlnews @MrRae1000 Did Britain lift a finger to help the French during Siege of Paris 1870?

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) April 20, 2016

@grumpydip @Otto_English @DavidJo52951945 @edlnews @MrRae1000 So what was WW1 really all about? Nobody knows about the 1915 General Election

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) April 20, 2016

@grumpydip @Otto_English @DavidJo52951945 @edlnews @MrRae1000 So the British lost their empire over a Liberal PM wanting to win an election.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) April 20, 2016

@grumpydip @Otto_English @DavidJo52951945 @edlnews @MrRae1000 If there had been no election in 1915 Britain would not have started WW1.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) April 20, 2016

@grumpydip @Otto_English @DavidJo52951945 @edlnews @MrRae1000 Germany marching through Belgium to France would just have been a EUROPEAN war

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) April 20, 2016

@grumpydip @Otto_English @DavidJo52951945 @edlnews @MrRae1000 Nothing more dangerous than a wobbly empire feeling insecure about itself, eh?

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) April 20, 2016

'Britain is an old and declining empire embarrassed by its weakness'

Parliament did not vote on war on 3rd August 1914

The two ruinous world wars Britain inexplicably fought

Paul Craig Roberts:

America became a superpower because of the self-destruction of other countries.

That's right, folks. Americans didn't actually fight for their overseas empire, the dumb ass British handed theirs to them on a platter.

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/04/18/how-the-american-neoconservatives-destroyed-mankinds-hopes-for-peace-paul-craig-roberts-2/

7 August 2015
rttimes.co.uk

Descendants of cannon fodder complain about British foreign policy and the genetic and moral damage it caused to the British race. Gentiles being cruel to Jews should not surprise anyone who has seen Fiddler on the Roof or read The Merchant of Venice. Anti-Semitism has always been endemic in Christian Europe and the Catholic Church was clearly to blame.  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_libel#Views_of_the_Catholic_Church

St. Pius V in the bull Hebraeorum gens (26 February 1569) did not reference blood libel, but he did make multiple accusations against the Jews, including: usury, theft, receiving stolen goods, pimping, divination and magic. He finishes with this accusation: "Finally, we have sufficiently investigated and explored how unworthily this perverse race attacks the name of Christ; how much hated it is by all those who bear that name; and, finally, with what cunning it plots against their lives."

Pope Benedict XIV wrote a bull Beatus Andreas (22 February 1755) in which he does not express any doubt concerning the murders of children ascribed to the Jews. He states they are perpetrated "out of hatred of Christ" and "out of hatred for the Christian faith" in his De servorum Dei beatificatione. In the bull he speaks about determining what is to be done "when there arises a case of this sort, which often comes to be put forward, concerning some boy who was slain by the Hebrews in Holy Week out of hostility to Christ, such as Blessed Simon and Anderl and also many of the other murdered boys whom the authors mention".

The Edict of Expulsion has not yet been repealed. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edict_of_Expulsion 

@grumpydip @Otto_English @DavidJo52951945 @edlnews @MrRae1000 Asquith was an adulterer, apparently. https://t.co/dqr9iNp5XL

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) April 20, 2016

@grumpydip @Otto_English @DavidJo52951945 @edlnews @MrRae1000 To hv lost ur empire cos it was left in the charge of n adulterer is shaming.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) April 20, 2016

@Patriarchalist "While he never wrote to his three sons who were serving in France, Asquith would write to Venetia sometimes 3 times a day".

— Stefano Giannini (@stegian67) April 20, 2016

@grumpydip @Otto_English @DavidJo52951945 @edlnews @MrRae1000 You can't really trust pussywhipped men in high places, can you?

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) April 20, 2016

@grumpydip @Otto_English @DavidJo52951945 @edlnews @MrRae1000 Who still thinks sex between consenting adults is no business of the state's?

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) April 20, 2016

Bad parenting and bad blood started WW1?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p01pw7nx
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p01pw8ds

Cousins At War was another excuse to go through the family history of the Royals again. Those of us who know, know Britain didn't have to declare war on Germany. Did Britain lift a finger to save the French during the siege of Paris in 1870? Nope.

The German Ambassador in London couldn't believe Britain was entering WW1 "over a scrap of paper" - The Treaty of London 1839 - guaranteeing Belgian neutrality.

WW1 was caused by the Archduke Franz Ferdinand's assassination, not George V declaring war on Wilhelm II after he had been naughty and annoyed his relations yet again.

I doubt that even if Wilhelm II had been exposed at birth that would have prevented Archduke Franz Ferdinand's assassination.

It is breathtakingly dishonest of the British to blame Wilhelm II when it was Liberal Prime Minister Asquith who declared war on Germany in 1914 in the hope increasing the chances of the Liberal Party winning in the General Election of 2015 after a short successful war. http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/poppy-mania-day-prevents-any-rational.html When the war started to go really badly for Britain, the election was cancelled, as you would expect.

How old was Bismarck when he was sacked by Wilhelm II? 75. How old would he have have been in 1914? 99 years old, but apparently such a super statesman - as these historians seem to believe - that he would have been able to stop Kaiser in his tracks when he declared war on Britain ....

Listen to the British sneering at Wilhelm II in ‪#‎RoyalCousinsAtWar‬, blaming him for their rotten foreign policy which lost them their world empire.

When will the British take responsibility for the loss of their empire instead of forever blaming Germany and the Kaiser? "Look at what you made me do!" says Britain to Germany, for ever and ever ....

Wilhelm II, Emperor of Germany and King of Prussia (1859-1941), when Prince of Prussia

What was British foreign policy in WW1 & 2? Thwarting the Germans. What do British historians do? Blame the Germans, and never ever take responsibility for their insane foreign policy that lost them their world empire in thirty years.

The British now pretend they sacrificed their world empire to save the Jews. The Jews at least gained Israel, and the biggest loser of WW2 was Britain.

So, if Britain wants to blame the loss of their empire on something or someone they should blame the Liberal Party and Asquith who was Liberal Prime Minister of the time, as well as the operation of democracy.

Remember: British foreign policy is forged on the dunghill that is the indifference, ignorance and arrogance of the average voter on the subject. They are happy to believe any ill of foreigners, as long as they can feel that they or their leaders are not to blame. This policy continues to this day. Having lost their empire, the British are now proceeding to lose their marbles, driven mad by the depth of their folly and the extent of their loss. Their foreign policy seems to be double or quits until they they win or go broke. It is unlikely that they will win.

A historical analysis of Holocaust Memorial Day

Holocaust Memorial Day has now become another Jewish festival, but which gentiles are now also obliged to celebrate.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 27, 2015

@ntfem @BBCr4today who chooses the historic moments we should 'never forget' and the ones we should brush under the carpet.
— Umair Saeed (@AreWeRobots) January 27, 2015

Holocaust Memorial Day has now become another Jewish festival, but which gentiles are now also obliged to celebrate.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 27, 2015

@AreWeRobots @BBCr4today The British lost their empire fighting two world wars and they have to think it was cos they were saving the Jews.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 27, 2015

@AreWeRobots @BBCr4today Did you know that England under under Edward I did what Hitler utterly failed to do? http://t.co/R3HgGqW7db
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 27, 2015

@AreWeRobots @BBCr4today It was not just the English who hated Jews, of course, for antisemitism was endemic in Christian Europe.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 27, 2015

@AreWeRobots @BBCr4today British lost their empire cos a Liberal PM was trying to win an election - that is the perniciousness of democracy.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 27, 2015

@AreWeRobots @BBCr4today If WW2 was a continuation of WW1, as some historians say, then Britain lost its empire because of WW1.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 27, 2015

@AreWeRobots @BBCr4today In both WW1 and WW2 it was Britain that declared war on Germany, not the other way round.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 27, 2015

@AreWeRobots @BBCr4today Holocaust Memorial Day also makes me think of David Irving he being Britain's most infamous Holocaust Denier.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 27, 2015

@AreWeRobots @BBCr4today I believe the British political establishment have even more of an interest in affirming the Holocaust than Jews.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 27, 2015

@AreWeRobots @BBCr4today The British need to believe they lost their empire over a worthwhile cause not cos of an electioneering Liberal PM.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 27, 2015

@AreWeRobots @BBCr4today If enough people concluded that representative democracy lost the British their empire, then they would give it up.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 27, 2015

@AreWeRobots @BBCr4today The British, known to have the greatest empire since life on earth began, lost it in about 30 years thru democracy.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 27, 2015

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Thirty_Years%27_War