Translate

Showing posts with label sexual morality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sexual morality. Show all posts

Sunday, 16 July 2017

E Michael Jones on sexual morality and the price of sex




E Michael Jones:

What this means is you have to act like a homosexual now, even if you're not a homosexual. What does that mean?
You engage in transient, sterile sexual relationships because they're cheap and because of that you're not going to ask for a raise whereas if you'd gotten married and had children you would have all this responsibility and you'd need more money. So what we have now is Berlin as the new paradigm of urban development. The gay mayor of Berlin says:
"We're poor, but we're sexy."
That's the paradigm for the entire world right now. In other words, even if you're not homosexual, you should act like a homosexual and engage in transient sterile relationships and be content with low-waged jobs because we'll call them start-ups, which will be the excuse for not paying you a decent wage. This is the way state of the art sexual liberation is being used to control primarily the millennial generation which is not forming families. The millennials have swallowed this homosexual propaganda hook, line and sinker and don't understand how they're being controlled by it.

Friday, 20 January 2017

Two very important essays by F Schmidt that say what I say about sex and God

Feminism is the natural expression of women's changing mating preference in a decaying society.  But let's imagine that we could magically eliminate feminism.  Would this be better for humanity?  I believe that what this would look like is America almost permanently stuck in the 1950s.  As I explained in "The Rise and Fall of Christian Culture", American culture began to break down in the 1800s when religion went from encouraging people to follow Jesus's moral teaching to simply having a personal relationship with Jesus.  With such a change, it was inevitable that society would lose focus on the core issues of sexual morality, and lose the ability of effective enforcement.  In the 1950s, America retained the facade of a moral culture, but underneath society was breaking down.  Women clearly expressed sexual excitement for "bad boys" in movies.  And I am certain that this must have corresponded to a rising adultery rate.  Without feminism, the facade could have remained intact for centuries, with moral men continuing to find wives but these wives cheating on them and having illegitimate children with immoral men.  The genetic breakdown of society would have been much slower, but the ultimate result would have been the same.  So instead of taking decades for society to call apart, it would have taken centuries.  Which is preferable?  I think it is preferable for a morally broken society to fall apart as quickly as possible so that it can be replaced by something else.  Feminism doesn't change the end result, it only speeds it up.  And so I support feminism.

What about the poor suffering moral men in modern culture who can't get women?  One can read the complaints of these men all over the internet.  If you suggest options to these men like using a prostitute or looking abroad, they will tell you that they want validation.  Any moral man who wants validation from a woman in modern culture is simply a moron who deserves to suffer and die without reproducing.  Unlike feminists, he hasn't slightest understanding of evolution.  The only sound evolutionary strategy for moral men is to join together to form moral patriarchal societies.  Such societies are evolutionarily superior to modern culture.  When modern culture has decayed sufficiently, a good moral patriarchal culture should attack modern culture and slaughter all of its men for the genetic good of humanity.

If a woman from the modern culture calls a moral man a loser, the correct response is "I would be a loser if I were a member of your culture, but I am not.  My culture is superior to your culture and my culture will eventually destroy your culture."  Intelligent moral men must reject modern culture and find an alternative.  And from the perspective of an alternative culture, we can recognize feminism as a good thing that is helping to destroy our enemy, namely modern culture. 

http://www.mikraite.org/In-Defense-of-Feminism-td570.html
So evolutionary salvation requires one god and the right god. And the god of the Old Testament is certainly the right god. Are there any others? Are there any other books in this world that address the issues of human evolution even close to the degree that the Old Testament does? None that I know of. And this is why the only means of evolutionary salvation is through God.  
http://www.mikraite.org/Human-Evolution-td17.html

Wednesday, 20 April 2016

How Britain lost its world empire and why sexual morality matters


'Britain is an old and declining empire embarrassed by its weakness'

Parliament did not vote on war on 3rd August 1914

The two ruinous world wars Britain inexplicably fought

Paul Craig Roberts:

America became a superpower because of the self-destruction of other countries.

That's right, folks. Americans didn't actually fight for their overseas empire, the dumb ass British handed theirs to them on a platter.

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/04/18/how-the-american-neoconservatives-destroyed-mankinds-hopes-for-peace-paul-craig-roberts-2/

7 August 2015
rttimes.co.uk



Descendants of cannon fodder complain about British foreign policy and the genetic and moral damage it caused to the British race. Gentiles being cruel to Jews should not surprise anyone who has seen Fiddler on the Roof or read The Merchant of Venice. Anti-Semitism has always been endemic in Christian Europe and the Catholic Church was clearly to blame.  


St. Pius V in the bull Hebraeorum gens (26 February 1569) did not reference blood libel, but he did make multiple accusations against the Jews, including: usury, theft, receiving stolen goods, pimping, divination and magic. He finishes with this accusation: "Finally, we have sufficiently investigated and explored how unworthily this perverse race attacks the name of Christ; how much hated it is by all those who bear that name; and, finally, with what cunning it plots against their lives."

Pope Benedict XIV wrote a bull Beatus Andreas (22 February 1755) in which he does not express any doubt concerning the murders of children ascribed to the Jews. He states they are perpetrated "out of hatred of Christ" and "out of hatred for the Christian faith" in his De servorum Dei beatificatione. In the bull he speaks about determining what is to be done "when there arises a case of this sort, which often comes to be put forward, concerning some boy who was slain by the Hebrews in Holy Week out of hostility to Christ, such as Blessed Simon and Anderl and also many of the other murdered boys whom the authors mention".

The Edict of Expulsion has not yet been repealed. 


Friday, 11 March 2016

Guess which religious minority is keeping up standards in London?

In the UK, in 2014, 59.4% of births were extramarital in North East of England, 58.9% in Wales, 54.2% in North West England, 52.4% in Yorkshire and the Humber, 52% in East Midlands, 50.8% in Scotland, 50.4% in West Midlands, 48.5% in South West England, 45.5% in East of England, 43.2% in Northern Ireland, 42.9% in South East England, and 35.7% in London.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legitimacy_(family_law)

Marriage is eugenic, bastardy dysgenic.

A way of shaming sluts: quran.com/24/2

Why the White Race is Declining in Numbers and Quality

Friday, 20 March 2015

Race has NOTHING to do with why police were initially reluctant to pursue Muslim sex predators

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/aug/26/rotherham-abuse-report-protection-not-blame
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/26/rochdale-ukip-liberal-left-race-sexual-abuse shows that even Julie Bindel who hates my guts and blocks me on Twitter act agrees with me! Nobody, but nobody but nobody really cares about teen sluts whose mothers are sluts who carelessly conceived them and then carelessly abandoned them to the care system.

... culture and ethnicity is relevant, but not in the way that the BNP and Ukip would claim. It is relevant because police, already not caring enough about teenage girls being abused, could not be bothered with dealing with the flak of being accused of racism; it is not because they were being ultra-careful not to target an already maligned ethnic group.

The reason there was inaction and poor practice in tackling this crime early on is not political correctness but rather racist cowardice combined with a distaste for the victims. 

Sunday, 2 March 2014

Peter Hitchens won't condemn the low sexual morals of British women because of how his mother died, I have concluded.

Why won't this political commentator with the sad dead eyes discuss the low standards of sexual morality of most British women?  Because his mother committed suicide with an Anglican clergyman in a hotel in Athens?


http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/why-is-peter-hitchens-soft-on-ssms.html

https://twitter.com/ClarkeMicah/status/439742617606426624

http://althouse.blogspot.co.uk/2010/06/your-mother-committed-suicide-in-pact.html

In 1973, Hitchens' mother committed suicide in Athens in a suicide pact with her lover, a former clergyman named Timothy; they bled to death, in what was initially thought to be a murder scene, after overdosing on pills and cutting their throats and wrists. He flew alone to Athens to recover her remains. While there he reported on the Greek constitutional crisis that was happening at the time. It became his first leading article for The New Statesman. Hitchens stated his belief that his mother was pressured into taking her own life under the fear of his father becoming aware of her infidelity.

Even now this disgraced woman is exercising her malign influence on her son now in his 60s. Peter Hitchens fears to discuss the disgracefully low moral standards of British women because he understandably does not wish to discuss the morals of his late mother.

http://www.theguardian.com/books/2002/apr/14/politics

While he was at Oxford he became aware that his parents had quietly separated - he saw his mother walking down the high street with a man carrying her shopping bags, and afterwards she told him she was living with this man and what did he think? He made encouraging noises - he wanted his mother to be happy - but didn't pay much attention.

In 1973 he had a phone call from his father asking if he knew where his mother was, because her passport was missing. He said he didn't. A few days later he was in bed with a new girlfriend when the phone rang and it was an old girlfriend asking if he was all right. He said yes, fine. Because, she said, there was a story in The Times that a woman with his mother's name had been murdered by her lover in a hotel in Athens. 'So I went out and got the paper and there it was.' He contacted the police and then flew out to Athens to identify the body - he was taken to the hotel room where it happened. The police at first believed it was murder, because there was blood everywhere. But then they found a suicide note addressed to Christopher, saying, in effect, 'You will understand one day.' Apparently, the couple had made a suicide pact and had both taken pills, but the man had also slit his throat and wrists. Hitchens believes that his mother had come to her senses at some stage and tried to ring for help, but there was no response.

After a long police inquiry, he buried the bodies in Athens and brought the effects home. He had to take the man's effects to his family - an ex-wife and daughter - 'and they weren't particularly pleased to see me'. He found out later that the lover was a defrocked priest with a history of manic depression. He believes that he must have talked his mother into the suicide pact. 'She probably thought things were getting sordid - he wasn't able to hold a job down, she couldn't go back, she was probably about the age I am now and perhaps there was that - she'd been very pretty - and things were never going to get any better, so why go through with it? She might not have been that hard to persuade, but I know that she did try to save herself because I have the photographs still. So that was sort of the end of family life really.'

This was the end of a promiscuous woman.  To be promiscuous does not mean necessarily to have many sex partners, merely to be indiscriminate.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Promiscuity

Promiscuity, in human sexual behaviour, is the practice of having casual sex frequently with different partners or of being indiscriminate in the choice of sexual partners.

Can it be true that one wrong partner and one ill-advised act of copulation, and you are a slut? Yes, because even virgins can get pregnant the first time they have sex.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

Even Conservative writers can be infamously promiscuous, or compromised by their wives.

The adultery of Kingsley Amis led to the adultery of his wife.  The adultery of his wife led to truly fucked up life of the sister of Martin Amis, Sally Amis, commemorated in his book The Pregnant Widow.

It doesn't look like Martin Amis has still got it about Islam judging from what he said at
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/martin-amis-30-things-ive-learned-about-terror-418950.html  Amis sneers at Islam even as he writes about his dead sister, not acknowledging the almost Oresteian horror of his sister's life that came about because of the liberal tolerance of sluts.

Sally Amis: "She was pathologically promiscuous."  "It would have needed the Taliban to protect her."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/booknews/6615552/Martin-Amis-the-sexual-revolution-killed-my-sister-Sally.html

Actually, no.  A prohibition against the extramarital sex would have done the job nicely, but men like Martin Amis must have their cheap slut sex as anyone who has read his books would know.

For some reason The Pregnant Widow didn't go down well with feminists, probably because they didn't like the fact that a slut came to a sticky end, I suppose.  

Liberal arrogance seems to be the order of the day by the British intelligentsia. White people don't need rules, they seem to be saying with their insufferable chauvinism.  "The colour of our skin will protect us from the slings and arrows of outrageous sluttery, our mothers and sisters can be dead sluts, but we are still around, giving our opinions about this and that, but carefully pussyfooting around the subject of sluts being bad for Britain and the agents of degeneracy and decline.  By the time the shit hits the fan we will be dead. We also deep down hate our liberally-parented children, so we hope they suffer when they have to deal with their excrement-spattered surroundings we have left behind. "

Read about the tragic life of Sally Amis at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Amis and marvel at how Peter Hitchens and Martin Amis are still sneering at Muslims and the religion they regard as so backward and barbaric wondering why Muslims don't want to integrate into this liberal shit of saying it is OK for your women to be sluts.

Do we want our daughters and sisters ending up like Sally Amis and Peter Hitchens' mum?  No thank you.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14513517  The whites have become black' says David Starkey

https://old.jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20070204/focus/focus2.html 85% of mothers in Jamaica SSMs.

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379

The decline of the West is directly linked to its tolerance of low standards of sexual morality. Peter Hitchens complains about the decline of the West time but refuses to make the link, when even the liberal BBC is gingerly pussyfooting around this subject on The Sunday Programme.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03wgy71

Uganda has passed an anti-gay bill which sentences people to life imprisonment for gay sex. Rahul Rao is an expert on the development of anti-gay feeling in Uganda and explains what role religion has played in the Bill. Scott Little is an American evangelical anti-gay activist who has advised the Ugandan governnment. He explains the rationale for his beliefs.

While I understand his reluctance to discuss the delicate matter of one's disgraced mother's morals, I am under no such constraints.  If he had any sense of honour at all he would encourage The Mail to hire me as a columnist, instead of striving to ignore me and saying that single mothers "should not be condemned or harassed".  Why on earth not?  It is the only language stupid sluts understand.

"Your mother committed suicide, in a pact with a lover, in 1973. Did she suffer from lifelong depression?"

"No. I think she was having a bad menopause, and she was losing her looks, which were pretty impressive."

I am sorry to be so brutal, Peter Hitchens, but I am sick and tired of the collective neurosis of British men and their knee-jerk deference to sluts who cannot be criticised.  "We know who is in power by those whom we cannot criticise", don't we?  The British pornocracy are in charge of the ship of state, and it is time to take the wheel from them NOW.

Feminism should be challenged HEAD ON.  If you hate gay marriage, then ask yourself why 83% of female MPs voted for this abomination, while only 48% of male MPs did.

ASK YOURSELVES THIS.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/if-you-hate-gay-marriage-blame-83-of.html

No one, but no one but no one will discuss this subject.  Criticising sluts is the equivalent of blasphemy for liberals and British men, even those who do not consider themselves liberals, like Peter Hitchens.

If feminism is a cancer, then SSMs are cancer cells.  https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379   The cancer has spread to all major organs of state.  The now disgraced Constance Briscoe, an SSM, was a member of the judiciary. It was a mistake to have appointed her in the first place.  In Islam, extramarital sex attracts corporal punishment.  In Islam, Constance Briscoe would have been considered a sex criminal.  http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/feb/12/constance-briscoe-april-retrial-case-chris-huhne  Time to discuss the low standards of sexual morality of Western women, Peter Hitchens, Britain's most influential Conservative journalist.  I have made it easy for you now.

If the late Mrs Hitchens had lived, would she have become like this woman at
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2570947/15-men-30-two-one-day-How-I-discovered-age-60-Im-irresistible-men-20s-looking-sex-no-strings.html?

Or would she be more like Shirley Conran?  http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/why-jasper-conran-no-longer-speaks-to.html

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Tinker_Tailor_Soldier_Spy_(film)

Control: He has the name of the mole the Russians have planted in the British intelligence service, right at the top of the Circus [British Intelligence]. There's a rotten apple, Jim; we have to find it.

rotten apple
nouninformal
noun: rotten apple; plural noun: rotten apples
1.
used to refer to a morally corrupt person in a group, regarded as capable of having an adverse effect on others.

"The rotten apple turned out to be Smiley's wife."

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/there-is-rotten-apple-jim-right-at-top.html
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2011/09/perverse-subjection-of-men-to-women-in.html


More pornocratic rotten apples in British public life
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/who-are-pornocracy-who-rule-britain.html


Monday, 28 October 2013

Questions to ponder on morality


  1. What is the space that is in between morality and law?  (The gap that lies between morality and law is the gap that lies between being a slut and an SSM. Being a slut is immoral, but not illegal, and I propose no punishment until the slut becomes an SSM attracting the punishment of 100 lashes.  The difference between a slut and an SSM is therefore the difference between a suspected criminal and a convicted criminal.)
  2. Can morality exist without law?
  3. Can law exist without morality?
  4. Is what is necessary always moral?
  5. What is the purpose of morality?
  6. Is the purpose of morality the long-term survival and health of your society?  
  7. Is there such a thing as liberal morality?
  8. Is liberal morality a contradiction in terms?
  9. Is it the totalitarian Equality Act 2010 that enforces liberal morality?
  10. If the purpose of morality is to engender social cohesion, how successful do you think liberal morality has been at this?  
  11. Is the sum of liberal morality healthy eating, sexual liberation, to not be homophobic, to not be racist, to not be sexist, to nurture the weak and stupid until their numbers overwhelm the strong and rational at general elections?
  12. Is liberal morality effeminate?
  13. Is the Equality Act 2010 and no-fault divorce the twin pillars of the matriarchy?  
  14. Is the patriarchy the lesser evil?
  15. If we are morally rational people should we not choose the lesser evil?  
  16. Does sexual morality influence general standards of morality?
  17. If most of the mothers in your country are SSMs https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379,  most of your women sluts (ie fornicatresses), most of your children bastards and most of your men MCSFs (Morally-Compromised Slut-Fuckers) http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/all-spossms-are-mcsfs-but-not-all-mcsfs.html,  do you think another group who does not suffer from these moral cancers easily defeat you in any human endeavour?  
  18. What are we to think of feminists who refuse to discuss sexual morality?
  19. Is feminism a moral ideology?  
  20. What are we to think of feminists who wish to deny the concept of slut?
  21. Is it not Orwellian the way feminists want to deny the concept of slut?  
  22. Why do you think feminists wish to deny the concept of slut?
  23. Do feminists wish to deny the concept of slut because most Western women are in fact sluts, ie fornicatresses?
  24. If most women in a society are fornicatresses, does it make most men fornicators?
  25. If most children are singly-parented, are these children likely to take on the vices of their single-parent who in the overwhelming number of cases would be their mother?
  26. Is the reason why most British men are now effeminate because they were brought up by their single mothers?
  27. Is men saying it is OK for their women to be sluts ie fornicatresses the equivalent of men handing over masculine and parental authority to women, with predictable results of decline and degeneracy?  
  28. Is the reason why British men refuse to discuss the low morals of their women because they know that if they acknowledged this, they would have to do something about it? 
  29. Is the reason why British nationalists (whom you would expect to care about the quality of their race) refuse to discuss sexual morality because they are the group and class of people most afflicted by this societal cancer and most frightened of losing sexual access to their women, who are overwhelmingly fornicatresses and SSMs?  
  30. Are women now so powerful that men now want to become women and are prepared to mutilate their genitals to do so?  http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/16593126

Saturday, 18 August 2012

How to measure a nation's morality through the morality of its women

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/how-to-score-womans-morals-from-perfect.html

Basically, all you have to do is ask every parent in the land if their children are illegitimate.


  • 1 point per illegitimate child
  • 1 point per illegitimate grandchild
  • average the score out for every citizen who is a parent you asked
  • compare it to other nations who have undergone the same methods of accounting
  • whichever nation with the fewest points wins the prize of being deemed most happy and glorious of all the nations in the world

I know you are all going to say it is Saudi or Afghanistan, but I suggest all the nations of the world do it and see what happens.  

We could start doing this in the UK to see if Welsh women really are sluttier than the English or the Scotties.  

Friendships: places of wisdom or echo chambers?

11:01 AM @teestrypzSOG ​#1 ​Wagwan Marc 11:02 AM @MarcInTbilisi ​​wagwan? 11:02 AM @βρεττς ​​I think if you talk honestly and can receive it...