THE VOICE OF REASON
Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
Translate
Showing posts with label representative democracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label representative democracy. Show all posts
Democracy allows the toxic ideology of feminism to thrive and take over all the organs of state. True/False #GE2015
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 27, 2015
Every time you vote, the number of Slut Single Mothers and their illegitimate offspring increases. True/False #GE2015
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 27, 2015
Every time you vote, the number of paedophiles increases. True/False #GE2015
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 27, 2015
Voting causes feminism which causes immigration, family breakdown, illegitimacy degeneracy and paedophilia. True/False #GE2015
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 27, 2015
If government noticeably worsens after every election, should we stop 1) voting or 2) holding general elections? #GE2015
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 27, 2015
If voting makes us more stupid and degenerate, we should stop voting and abolish representative democracy. Logical/Illogical #GE2015
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 27, 2015
So sweet n romantic of Hitler to make an honest woman of Eva Braun when he must have had so many things on his mind. http://t.co/YFWHC9DaLo
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 21, 2015
Perhaps I am just an old softy but how many dictators about to die would think of marrying their mistress? http://t.co/YFWHC9DaLo#Hitler
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 21, 2015
It was incredibly considerate of Hitler to marry his mistress to avoid her being condemned as a slut post mortem. http://t.co/YFWHC9DaLo
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 21, 2015
Was Hitler considerate towards his mistress and kind to his servants as well being fond of animals and children?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 21, 2015
Did you know what Hitler said he missed after becoming dictator? Going shopping and buying his friends presents at Christmas.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 21, 2015
Report on the recent London Forum meeting at which prominent Holocaust deniers Pedro Varela and Mark Weber spoke http://t.co/5nIPZugVe4
— Graham Macklin (@macklin_gd) April 19, 2015
“Our guilt from the war is abused in political arguments,” he says. “It’s used to suggest how we should we treat migrants, and that our asylum policies should be as liberal as possible, and that we should bail out other countries using the euro.” He pauses to take a drink. “But none of that has anything to do with the objective facts of our past.”
At the end of the day it is the SYSTEM that it is fault, and by this I mean the system with which you chose your government.
This unfortunately means REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY in an environment of indiscriminate universal suffrage has been a recipe for failure and is unlikely to be self-correcting.
Most countries in the world operate under this system and therefore most countries in the world suffer from the same problem.
What are the alternatives?
Well, there is the one-party state which China has, which is to all intents and purposes NATIONAL SOCIALIST. Strange that it has turned out that the Chinese have turned out to be better at National Socialism under a one party state than the Germans.
The other option is what the Islamists propose.
I can't think of third option, can you?
What no one seems to see is that the West is now a matriarchy, and this means a society that does not practise or respect marriage.
There is of course a reason why marriage is considered an institution, and an institution is basically a naturally-occurring practice that exists in all human societies eg slavery, prostitution, warfare.
All religions promote and practise marriage for the very good reason that marriage is eugenic.
To respect marriage, you have to forbid extramarital sex, which is what the Abrahamic faiths do.
All matriarchies are primitive and declining societies, all patriarchies are advanced civilisations, without exception.
The religion of the West is not Christianity but PC Liberalism, which is all about promoting and practising sexual liberation and extramarital sex.
When general standards of sexual morality fall noticeably short of the ideal of marriage ie NO EXTRAMARITAL SEX, then general moral and educational standards deteriorate.
What is the purpose of having moral standards?
If all members of the group have the same moral standards and obey the same rules then they are more likely to be socially cohesive and be able to defend themselves better against their enemies.
All societies have two kinds of enemies: internal enemies and external enemies.
The internal enemies of all societies are always sluts and socialists.
After May 7, Britain will become even more of a society ruled by sluts and socialists. Today Sir David Steel was talking on the Today Programme about a minority Labour government. This will of course make you weaker against your external enemies.
At heart this is all about Western man having lost control over his women.
When you think about it, all Western men are lower than sluts, even the US President.
Even the US President, and anyone aspiring to be US President, must be conscious of how the female vote could swing things for him
If men say it is OK for women to have extramarital sex because they want to have extramarital sex with them, then they will end up being lower than unmarried mothers with illegitimate offspring.
This has already happened in all parts of the West, and you know it, really.
The reason why consecutive governments conspire to facilitate immigration is because their business voters need labour now, not in 18 years time when British mothers deign to have legitimate children, bring them up properly while living with their father and see to it that when they leave school they are fit to be employed.
None of the anti-immigration parties ever talk about this because they know doing so would alienate the female vote.
Plebs don't care about education, certainly not selective education and certainly not grammar schools, even if they know what they are in the first place.
Even the Tories won't talk about grammar schools now, but they were the schools that allowed bright working class children to get on in life.
All the problems of the West would actually be miraculously solved if men could bring themselves to support traditional marriage, but I know this is too much to expect, even amongst the men who are complaining about being victims of feminism.
Victims of feminism are beta males and beta males are by definition not sexy, and definitely not marriageable.
If you are not marriageable but still want to have sex with women you are not going to forbid extramarital sex, are you?
Of course not.
So you just stick to complaining about Jews and Muslims who - whatever you think of them - take marriage more seriously than people who call themselves Christians. This probably explains why Jews control Christians and why Christians fear Muslims.
Secretly or perhaps not so secretly, they would probably rather be impregnated by a warrior than a beta male they despise for lacking in masculinity.
Perhaps disdain for men is why women are increasingly becoming lesbians and perhaps why men who must have sex at any cost are becoming gay in increasing numbers.
Because of divorce laws that favour the poorer party, and the availability of the option of extramarital sex, fewer and fewer marriageable men are choosing to get married so this means illegitimacy will also spread far and wide amongst the upper and middle classes.
This will make Muslims in the West even more determined NOT to integrate into this degenerate culture and drive more and more of them to join ISIS rather than live under a government whose alpha male is afraid of omega females.
(Omega females - unmarried single mothers - are the least desirable sex partner for a rational man seeking a wife and a mother for his legitimate children.)
So, the enemies of society are not really Jews and Muslims, but feminazi promiscuous Western women that Western men have now completely lost control of.
If we have the rule that extramarital sex is forbidden - as the Muslims do - it would force women to choose their sex partners more carefully.
Men can of course cheat more easily since they are not the ones who are always left holding the baby and they can always skip town if they don't want to be forced into a shotgun marriage.
It will mean that some men are not going to be get reproductive rights at all and will have to make do with prostitutes, but doing this will ensure that the next generation will be better quality people and citizens than our generation.
Women just follow the money. Most women are really prostitutes and this makes most men punters. This is not edifying, and only marriage can make it better because marriage is held as an ideal of love and trust between a man and a woman.
I thought it was very interesting that the Koran tolerates brothels, while feminazis want to criminalise them.
Therefore in practice in an Islamic state brothels would be legal.
In a patriarchy, most of the sex that takes place would be married sex and prostitute sex.
In a matriarchy, most of the sex that takes place would be fornication and LGBT sex.
It is probably not hard to predict that the quality of the next generation in a patriarchy is bound to be better than a matriarchy's, is it?
Native Americans were matriarchal. The white man who took their land so easily was patriarchal.
Eugenics was really reinventing the wheel. Marriage was always always eugenic if you allow both parties to choose freely.
If marriage was respected again, the effect of that would be eugenic and social cohesion again.
I suspect however that people who identify with Christianity in the West would rather blame Jews and Muslims than accept the necessity of having to respect marriage again, even as I tell them again and again that they cannot expect Jews and Muslims to hold themselves back and not follow their religion so white people who identify themselves with Christianity can catch up with them.
What is the solution I offer and the bitter medicine that they refuse to take? It is of course Secular Koranism. http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html Secular Koranism would defenestrate the matriarchy, curb Jewish power by abolishing representative democracy and usury as well as end Muslim terrorism.
From the 40th minute you will get all the awkward questions being asked of Michael Gove from the audience. How much if at all do you think these issues have been addressed?
Why do you think David Cameron removed Michael Gove as Education Secretary?
Because he was stepping on too many toes and people were squealing.
Why did he make Nicky Morgan Education Secretary?
Because he knew she would do NOTHING to be upset anyone till the election was over.
This was in 2013.
How much longer has democracy got left before it implodes under the weight of its own lies and contradictions?
No government will improve standards of education until and unless there is a one-party state in which leaders of the teaching unions can be dealt with swiftly and decisively.
The problems of British education are now too entrenched, long-standing and bone-deep. No government will be able to solve them in one term of office and that is why it will never be attempted as long as representative democracy continues.
Have you noticed how democracy is about doing nothing and waiting for things to fail when there is so much to be done and so little time to be lost?
Have you noticed that democracy is really about knaves soliciting the vote of fools every five years and bribing voters with their own money?
Democracy means that no one is really in charge.
Democracy means passing the buck like a parcel with a ticking bomb until it blows up in someone's face.
I look forward to hearing that I am now on the Domestic Extremist List because I certainly don't believe in this dishonest demented and deficient system.
I will be voting UKIP in May 2015 however simply because I know things must get worse before they get better and pain is the only language smug liberals understand.
The position is very simple actually. You either decide whether you are a social conservative or a libtard.
If you are a libtard, then carry on voting for the mainstream parties.
If you are a social conservative then identify the strongest and most reliable source of social conservatism in your country. In the UK, the political party that is most socially conservative is UKIP.
But what is the most reliable source of social conservatism in the whole world?
That would come from religion, of course.
And which religion would most satisfy the condition of being the world's most reliable source of social conservatism?
It is Islam, of course.
Why do I not say Judaism?
Because it has very high entry requirements and you might as well not bother if you are going to become a Liberal or Reform Jew, and becoming an Orthodox Jew is probably too difficult for the average gentile who won't be able to last the course and will predictably fall by the wayside.
Why do I not say Christianity?
Because it has OBVIOUSLY FAILED.
What has happened to the Church of England is also happening to the Catholic Church, the most powerful church in the world. Christianity is now seen as the religion of the people who want to spread gay marriage all over the world and is despised and abhorred because of this. Indeed, the Archbishop of Canterbury himself said that the reason why African Muslims are murdering African Christians is because they want to show their disapproval of gay marriage. African Christians will be killed if C of E accepts gay marriage, says Justin Welby This was in April 2014.
That is why Boko Haram is making it very clear that Christianity and its associated infections of gay marriage will not be tolerated in Africa.
Its doom is sealed.
Why do I not say Hinduism?
Because, if people think Islam is not part of the cultural tradition of the West, Hinduism is even less so.
Why do I not say Buddhism?
Because it is about as useless as being an Anglican.
So there we are, back to Islam again.
Unless you have now given up on the idea completely, and retreated into thinking that voting UKIP will be enough to save yoru country from irreversible decline and degeneracy.
Do you REALLY think Farage and his band of Kippers is up to the job of doing this?
No, I didn't think so, but you are happy in your no man's land burying your head in the sand, voting UKIP, not voting for anyone at all, whingeing about the Jews, Muslims, blacks, Poles, and assorted immigrants . Yes, I do see where you are coming from.
If you have spent your entire life avoiding taking decisive action or drawing attention to yourself, I am not certainly not going to divert you from your chosen path.
Even if you don't believe in God, as I do not, would you really deny that social conservatism is best maintained and promoted through a religion whose laws shames sluts and promote marriage?
If you DO deny that marriage can only be promoted through religion and laws that shame sluts and promote marriage, then what is your alternative?
I think by the time we get to this stage of the discussion we are at the point of the discussion where you think, if not say, that "by the time the Muslims take over, I will be dead".
It is precisely this quality of "masculinity" that now makes me certain that it is only a matter of time before Islam triumphs in the West.
What we know is that men in the West are either married or unmarried.
The married ones won't want to think of their powerlessness, but the unmarried ones don't want to get married either.
Why should they get married if they can get sex from a woman they are not married to?
Why should they risk offending a group of women from whom they hope to have sex, whose members are mostly their female friends and female relations?
I do not put the cart before the horse.
What I do is state the problem, the extent of the problem and what degree of change is necessary to solve the problem.
No political party in the land is interested in promoting marriage.
They are not interested in promoting marriage because they know most men do not care if the woman they have sex with is not their wife.
They do not want to say anything to offend female voters because female voters are half of their potential supporters.
It is most probably too late to save Western civilisation as we know it, but there is a cure, even as I know most of you would rather die of the disease.
I do know that the things I propose to challenge and denounce are sacred to the West and to criticise them would have me branded as an extremist.
All of the above have very powerful interests and the overwhelming number of people regard challenging these concepts as taboo, even amongst those who wish to challenge the political establishment.
You see, I don't blame Jews for the fact that this message is not getting through. It is not getting through because people don't want to hear it, EVEN THE PEOPLE WHO ARE SUPPOSED TO BE ON MY SIDE.
I remain persona non grata in UKIP because they don't want to be associated with my ideas, which I of course acknowledge would alarm the voters horribly.
The socially, politically and intellectually insecure would have no interest in being associated with my message because they don't want to be more ostracised than they are already.
They would have enough on their plates dealing with the crap the liberal media are already throwing at them without having to deal with my stuff.
And so the default state of caution that is borne of timorousness will take over. It is a FEMININE state of mind, of course, and most men have now been feminised without knowing it.
If the men of a nation are known to be contemptible cowards incapable of standing up for any principle even as they claim they have free speech, then of course their enemies will multiply and increase in strength as they become more neurotic, demented and degenerate, after having been accorded a status that to all intents and purposes is below that of an unmarried unfit mother.
The truth is too awful to contemplate and no man will actually admit the extent of his current degradation nor discuss the measures necessary to restore him to his former position.
The men - mainly Muslim - who do recognise this have joined ISIS while Islamphobes tremble at the thought of the returning jihadis.
Did you know that 83% of female MPs voted for gay marriage while only 48% of male MPs did? http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/if-you-hate-gay-marriage-blame-83-of.html Women are said not to be very good at thinking in the abstract, and tend to "reason" with their emotions. This may explain why women are less likely to defend the principle of free speech, because they are probably not quite sure what a principle is and what it is for. Men, knowing that reasoning with women is a futile exercise, end up by just trying to understand and predict their moods. In the process of doing so, they too have begun to think like women and now behave like women, and that is why Western civilisation is going down the toilet. If it hasn't quite done so yet, it is perhaps analogous to a turd that keeps not being flushed away, but in time it will dissolve and go the way of all that is rotten, useless and past its sell by date, such as feminism and representative democracy ...
Holocaust Memorial Day has now become another Jewish festival, but which gentiles are now also obliged to celebrate.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 27, 2015
@ntfem@BBCr4today who chooses the historic moments we should 'never forget' and the ones we should brush under the carpet.
— Umair Saeed (@AreWeRobots) January 27, 2015
Holocaust Memorial Day has now become another Jewish festival, but which gentiles are now also obliged to celebrate.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 27, 2015
@AreWeRobots@BBCr4today The British lost their empire fighting two world wars and they have to think it was cos they were saving the Jews.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 27, 2015
@AreWeRobots@BBCr4today It was not just the English who hated Jews, of course, for antisemitism was endemic in Christian Europe.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 27, 2015
@AreWeRobots@BBCr4today British lost their empire cos a Liberal PM was trying to win an election - that is the perniciousness of democracy.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 27, 2015
@AreWeRobots@BBCr4today If WW2 was a continuation of WW1, as some historians say, then Britain lost its empire because of WW1.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 27, 2015
@AreWeRobots@BBCr4today Holocaust Memorial Day also makes me think of David Irving he being Britain's most infamous Holocaust Denier.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 27, 2015
@AreWeRobots@BBCr4today I believe the British political establishment have even more of an interest in affirming the Holocaust than Jews.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 27, 2015
@AreWeRobots@BBCr4today The British need to believe they lost their empire over a worthwhile cause not cos of an electioneering Liberal PM.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 27, 2015
@AreWeRobots@BBCr4today If enough people concluded that representative democracy lost the British their empire, then they would give it up.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 27, 2015
@AreWeRobots@BBCr4today The British, known to have the greatest empire since life on earth began, lost it in about 30 years thru democracy.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 27, 2015
@ntfem I'm not quite sure what relevance this piece of nonsense has, but considering your UKIP spt I'm not surprised by yo need to share it.
— Christopher Jordan (@ChristopherJor5) January 22, 2015
@ntfem Okay. Here's the deal. Any attack on democracy is nonsensical. Now go away and bother someone else with your nonsense.
— Christopher Jordan (@ChristopherJor5) January 22, 2015
@ntfem Okay. I'm going to block you now.
— Christopher Jordan (@ChristopherJor5) January 22, 2015
@ChristopherJor5 If you don't know the answer, just say you don't. No need to get aggressive.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 22, 2015
@ChristopherJor5 Thank you for your tweets which so illuminatingly revealed the arrogance, ignorance and incoherence of the average UK voter
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 22, 2015
It is telling that Melanie Phillips deliberately conflates Islam and Radical Muslims.
It is perceived that Jews constitute the Israel lobby that controls US foreign policy and that Britain and the rest of the West are but Uncle Sam's poodles, with Britain in the role of Chief Poodle.
We in Britain have our own Israel Lobby, of course - even UKIP have their Friends of Israel.
Israel, as it is currently constituted is no more than a Western colonial outpost since it proudly proclaims itself to be a liberal democracy when it should of course be a theocracy.
Participation in politics only makes one part of this machinery, to be exploited by Zionists and immoral promiscuous women, and this is why Radical Muslims like Anjem Choudary have proposed that it be replaced by the Caliphate under which Jews as well as everyone else would have to give up usury thereby giving up their economic power over gentiles.
This also has the advantage of allowing the West to default on its debts.
Secular Koranism is the antidote to feminism and Islamism.
If Islam is "Judaism Lite", the Secular Koranism is "Islam Lite".
I have been disabled from commenting on Melanie Phillips' Facebook page for making "bigoted comments about Jews". Is the truth "bigoted"? I will have her know that my best friend is an Orthodox Jewess! :-(
The comment she deleted was as follows:
It is perceived that Jews constitute the Israel lobby that controls US foreign policy and that Britain and the rest of the West are but Uncle Sam's poodles, with Britain in the role of Chief Poodle.
We in Britain have our own Israel Lobby, of course - even UKIP have their Friends of Israel.
It is the operation of democracy that allows the Israel Lobby to control Western foreign policy and parasitical never married single mothers to control domestic policy, neither of which are in the British long term national interest.
Participation in politics only makes one part of this machinery, and this is why Radical Muslims like Anjem Choudary have proposed that it be replaced by the Caliphate.
"If I am I because I am I, and you are you because you are you, then I am I and you are you. But if I am I because you are you and you are you because I am I, then I am not I and you are not you!"
Most nationalists are nationalists not because they want to preserve their culture (because they have no culture apart from their pub/drug/pop/TV culture) but because they resent the idea of other cultures being practised by other races in their country.
None of these cultures stop them from doing what they like doing eg football, clubbing, porn, extramarital sex, Britain's Got Talent, X Factor, Strictly Come Dancing, The Great British Bake Off, Big Brother etc, but that is not enough for them. They want other cultures to become like them, ie slut, bastard, paedo and NEET.
As for high culture, such as theatre, opera, concerts etc, BNP-supporters don't do that sort of thing anyway, do they?
They hate Jews/Muslims/Asians because Jews/Muslims/Asians practice their religion and culture (which includes respecting the institutions of marriage and the family) enabling Jews/Muslims/Asians to become more prosperous and socially cohesive than they are, while they are too busy watching porn, fucking sluts, having illegitimate offspring, claiming welfare as well as blaming other cultures and races for their problems to put their own houses in order.
They are too thick to blame their own dysfunctional political system, their dysgenic welfare state and their own political establishment who are made up mostly of fools and knaves, perpetually frightened of alienating the slut vote and too cowardly or stupid to acknowledge the inevitable failure of representative democracy to correct past and continuing errors of domestic and foreign policy.
When you try to tell them what is wrong with their culture, political system, religion, and in particular their neurosis of being in thrall to the female vote, you will of course be denounced as an extremist, Islamist etc.
The lower the morals of women, the lower the morals of men.
Or, even more infuriatingly, they will pretend not to know what you are on about.
I wish my Jewish readers - I am proud to say I know I have a few! - a Happy Hanukkah.
Jews are known to be the most cohesive group simply because their religion makes them practice their culture
Because they are successful, they are resented.
The only way they can make themselves less hated is to promote Islam, paradoxically, because that would mean the abolition of usury - for usury is the means through which Jewish power is asserted in the West on and through Western governments.
When Secular Koranism is implemented, then everyone can live together happily ever after, even in Israel ...
