Translate

Showing posts with label Luke Ford. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Luke Ford. Show all posts

Saturday, 20 June 2020

I engage with a leftist woman about statues and slavery

https://www.pscp.tv/lukeford/1kvKpeDwRlwGE

10:00  A woman finds me "intriguing" complaining about my allegedly "doctored pictures".

11:00  Luke Ford claims to have known me carnally. The more people - men and women - think of having sex with me, the more powerful I become. This Sheila claims I hate women. I only propose to lash unmarried parents 100 times per illegitimate offspring. Not all women are sluts, not all sluts become mothers, not all mothers are slut single mothers ie never married mothers.

12:00  Secular Koranism and my femininity

13:00  Sheila thinks I am a "catfish" after Luke claims he has been intimate with me on the internet.

14:00  Luke Ford says he didn't surrender his honour to me.

15:00  Our long intimate conversations with each other about Secular Koranism

16:00  No dick picks from Luke to me

19:00  I do acknowledge that Luke stood up for my honour.

44:00  I join to talk about statues.

45:00  Sour grapes and family heirlooms

46:00  A sign of weakness in the White Man not to defend his statues

47:00  9 in terms of symbolism of the unprincipled cowardice of Western Man

48:00  Disgust and contempt at Western Man

49:00  Verbally defending statues

50:00  The psychological impact of not defending statues

51:00  Peter Hitchens

52:00  Totemic

53:00  SHEILA returns.

54:00  Men too afraid of their women to defend their statues against desecration.

55:00  Slavery

56:00  Christopher Columbus and "idolising hatred"

57:00  I am the mind of a man happily inhabiting the body of a woman.
The Modern Slavery Act 2015
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Slavery_Act_2015

58:00  Hundreds of victims of slavery sleep rough in London, says charity
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/hundreds-of-victims-of-slavery-sleep-rough-in-london-says-charity-a4267466.html

Slavery and Sluttery
http://www.verbalremedy.co.uk/slavery-and-sluttery-an-interview-with-claire-khaw/

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2010/apr/29/stephen-bates-diary

"I see no harm in introducing a form of slavery with those who don't have the right papers and aren't British citizens. After five years they are free to go. They can re-enslave themselves for a further five years and thereafter become British citizens. It would solve the Labour shortage ... Then everyone would be happy."

59:00  Slaves could be middle class professionals and even bankers.

1:00:00  My recent streams have been about statues because I seem to care more Western Man's statues than he cares about them.

1:01:00  The Bible and the Koran never banned slavery.

Kneeling British policemen who behave like kneeling American policemen think Britain is the 51st state demonstrating that they have no sense of national identity.

1:02:00  If you're part of the global American Empire, you will be have Black Lives Matter in your country even if black people are not known for being victims of police brutality there eg Japan, Taiwan, Israel.

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2020/06/14/national/black-lives-matter-spreads-tokyo-2000-people-march-protest-racism/
https://focustaiwan.tw/society/202006130013


1:04:00  Black Lives Matter is racist if it forbids people from saying All Lives Matter.

It should be noted that women are more likely to be leftist and far more likely to be indifferent to the statues of their ancestors than men. 

1:05:00  Male and female, Yin and Yang

Two Jews talk about Karen and the alt-right
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2020/06/two-jews-talk-about-alt-right.html

1:07:00  "Child-hungry women"

1:08:00  I am "a fucking crazy paradox".

1:09:00  I am the mind of a man happily inhabiting the body of a woman. Nature abhors a vacuum and I have filled the vacuum that is Western masculinity.

1:11:00  "All women hate women."

1:13:00  Definition of catfish

1:15:00  Men and women love me and I love them too.

1:17:00  I was always interested in grown-up talk even as a child.

1:18:00  The Book of Chinese Beliefs by Frena Bloomfield

1:19:00  Things looking up for Secular Koranism because Richard Spencer & Co are so pathetic.

1:20:00  National Socialism and Bolshevism

Trotsky for Permanent Revolution, Stalin against.

1:21:00  All successful ideas aspire to global domination.

1:22:00  Things have to get worse before it gets better, making frightened Western Man more eager to accept Secular Koranism the lower he falls in status to Western Woman who doesn't care about his statues.

1:23:00  Tom Holland conflates Christianity with Liberalism.
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2020/04/jay-on-smug-liberal-intellectuals-like.html

1:24:00  Lockdown should end now. Lockdown turbo-charged Black Lives Matter.
at 1 comment:
Labels: , ,

Monday, 13 April 2020

A very interesting discussion on antisemitism


Luke Ford is a Jewish convert whose late father was the Seventh Day Adventist theologian Desmond Ford. His father's career was blighted for a mysterious theological reason I am simply quite unable to understand even though I am keenly interested in theology and tried to get my head round the subject. In the end I gave up concluding that it is in fact impossible to understand the nonsense that is Christian theology. I wonder if Luke, who has had his life blighted by this feature of his parentage understands it either. In any case, he saw fit to reject the absurdity of Christianity to embrace a religion that he thought would give him the protection and status he craved. In the West, Christianity is despised by Westerners who regard all religion as patently absurd because theirs is patently absurd and has indeed failed. Luke's innate sense of snobbery and racism prevented him from considering Islam for a moment because he saw Judaism as giving him the social cache he had always craved while Islam represented everything he and others like him in the alt-right hate and fear: uncool low status immigrant culture.

https://www.ministrymagazine.org/archive/1980/10/statement-on-desmond-ford-document
https://atoday.org/how-des-ford-changed-us-why-des-had-to-go/
https://atoday.org/part-2-how-the-church-changed-because-of-desmond-ford/
https://atoday.org/is-desmond-ford-really-the-dark-lord-of-adventism/
https://www.adventistreview.org/remembering-desmond-ford
https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1559&context=jats
https://religionnews.com/2019/03/12/desmond-ford-90-adventist-theologian-defrocked-for-controversial-beliefs-dies/
https://spectrummagazine.org/article/2016/01/13/desmond-fords-new-book-recalls-conflict-over-sanctuary-doctrine-dismissal-adventi
https://www.adventistbiblicalresearch.org/materials/independent-ministries-and-others/abcs-dr-desmond-fords-theology
https://thecompassmagazine.com/blog/why-desmond-ford-was-wrong-about-the-sanctuary-part-1

Hatred of gentiles by Jews is called loxism.

The Dissident Right seems quite unable to formulate rational and coherent arguments on anything, it seems.

The alt-right are low education, low-information and low status white men whose behaviour and demeanour makes women in the classes above them think they deserve to suffer. For this reason, it is easy to guilt by association anyone associated with them, including myself of course, though I share none of their characteristics. Presumably, this is to serve as a warning to others who wish to take up the cause of nationalism, which I define as government in the national interest - an abstract concept the white urban proletariat with their woefully inadequate state education are woefully ill-equipped to discuss. Because these men have no one in power prepared to defend their interests, the matriarchy consisting of spoilt and entitled college-educated white middle class women will always regard these unmarriageable and unemployable social retards with unvarnished horror triggered by the thought that any member of their sex might have to marry any of these low status low education unemployable and unmarriageable men.

Because of the welfare state, these men of the former working class no longer have a societal purpose other than be seen as a burden on the state to be bribed with extramarital sex, transgenderism to induce them to self-sterilise and UBI to keep them quiescent while warehoused for extinction. In the meantime, foreign workers are imported to do the work the formerly working classes were meant to do. It makes no sense at all, unless the purpose is to keep this whole shebang of representative democracy under indiscriminate universal suffrage going. China and Russia have been dropping gentle but unmistakable hints for Western nations to take democracy out with the trash and bury its stinking rotten corpse for a few years now. However, because the entire Western political establishment is in denial, the message has not been understood or absorbed, let alone implemented. I seem to be the only one prepared to discuss these things, but there appears to be a conspiracy of white men conspiring to deprive me of the oxygen of publicity. 

29:00  E Michael Jones blames everything but everything on Jews, even the bad policies of Catholic Irish American Democrats.

35:00  Jews are not protected if they associate with the Right.  There is a political litmus test.

39:00  "Reasonable and responsible questions"

40:00  E Michael Jones described as "a total crank".  The comedian Owen Benjamin is not worth wasting time on, says Cotto.

1:07:00  Gottfried praises Hitler's writing ability.

1:14:00  Assimilated German Jews who were German nationalists

1:18:00  Italian Jews who joined Mussolini's Fascist Party

1:25:00  A self-hating Jew is a Jewish Republican.

1:36:00  The most virulent antisemites are Jews.

1:41:00  Sin is just stuff we shouldn't do, for our own good.

1:42:00  Jews do not proselytise because exclusive clubs do not proselytise, but political parties do. Islam could be perhaps be regarded as a one party state with regional branches.

1:42:30  The gap between the observant and non-observant Jews is really the gap between theory and practice. The greater the gap, the greater the sin. The greater the sin, the more you will be punished by God if He exists through rising antisemitism and the Mandate of Heaven being withdrawn from the American empire that Jews are servants to, instead of being the slaves of God they were intended to be. In terms of status, is it better to be the servants of the American empire or the slaves of God? I do have a solution to the problem, but it will gain no traction if I can find no one courageous or educated enough capable of understanding what I am trying to say.
at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, 20 January 2019

The online community the Prophetess of Secular Koranism joined last summer



at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Sunday, 23 December 2018

Secular Koranism scrutinised by a liberal philosopher investigating the alt-right



Peak degeneracy as exemplified in the now deleted Luke Ford stream featuring the fake Orthodox Jew organ grinder and his goyim monkeys is discussed with distaste. Jim Goad and Nick Fuentes were summoned to display themselves for the delectation of the organ grinder's alt-right subscribers while excrement-like matter poured from their foul drunken mouths mouths.  Nick Fuentes also bitched about Richard Spencer.

The rest of this conversation concerns Secular Koranism, of no interest at all to any degenerates will only come here to hear the Fake Jew stream being discussed here.




at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, 26 November 2018

I discuss Mein Kampf and suggest that the degeneracy of the white race can be cured by restoring the patriarchy



1:01:00

Luke Ford's question:

Is there any significant difference between the worldview of Mein Kampf and the world view of the alternative-right?


CK:
A lot of Mein Kampf is about German matters of Germany in the 1930s. Its preoccupations would be quite different to the alt-right of the West now because alt-right is preoccupied with immigration and Nazi Germany didn't have an immigration problem, did it?

LF:
So let me just run it by you again. I'll just go point by point. Hitler had a biocentric worldview perspective on life: first of all a referenced nature so that is identical with the alt-right's perspective. The alt-right and its leaders are overwhelmingly atheists.

CK:
Hitler pretended to be Catholic. In his table talks he he actually favoured Islam because he thought Christianity was a stupid religion, although he was confirmed as a Catholic, so there were lots of things that he wanted to do but he knew he couldn't. He wanted to abolish usury. He did know something about Islam and thought it was a more masculine ...
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Adolf_Hitler

Both Hitler and Himmler had a soft spot for Islam. Hitler several times fantasized that, if the Saracens had not been stopped at the Battle of Tours, Islam would have spread through the European continent—and that would have been a good thing, since “Jewish Christianity” wouldn’t have gone on to poison Europe. Christianity doted on weakness and suffering, while Islam extolled strength, Hitler believed. Himmler in a January 1944 speech called Islam “a practical and attractive religion for soldiers,” with its promise of paradise and beautiful women for brave martyrs after their death. “This is the kind of language a soldier understands,” Himmler gushed.

https://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-and-culture/books/187128/nazi-romance-with-islam

LF [pretending I had gone off topic when what I said was exactly on point because he did not like me suggesting that Islam is the answer because Christianity is kaput]:
OK, Claire, I need you to stay on topic. So Hitler had a biocentric worldview. His perspective on life was first of all referenced in nature. He contended that before anything else we must attend to nature the world of living things in their environments and is not separate from or above nature but rather a part of nature we need to come to grips with how our nature actually operates, we must align our lives with nature, we must obey nature's laws. That is the alt-right's perspective.

CK:
Is it? I wasn't aware of that. I didn't even know Hitler said all of that. It sounds very vague.

LF:
You know, it sounds pretty clear to me. I mean I don't know what to say if you don't see that that's the that's the building block for Social Darwinism ....

CK:
Is it arguing for Social Darwinism or something like that is that? Is that what you're saying?

LF:
I don't know how you can get more clear than this: Hitler had a biocentric worldview that we must  ...

CK:
What does that mean? Does it mean German-centric?

LF:
Does biocentric mean German-centric? Really that's what you're asking me? Biocentric is very clear, Claire, it means a worldview based in nature that humans must align themselves with nature, obey nature's laws that we're not separate ...

CK:
What does that mean? Does it mean empire?

LF:
Because we are in nature, frequently our choice is either kill or be killed ...

CK:
OK,  so he started acquiring empire and it ended badly so maybe that's not always the best thing.

LF:
I'm not talking about whether this is the best thing to do, I'm asking if you can come up with any significant differences between ... 

CK [answering the question immediately and succinctly]:

The alt-right are not about war but about pogrom.

LF [pretending I had not answered the question because he didn't like my answer]:

OK, you've got to stay on topic Claire. When I ask a question you've got to respond to the topic. We can't just go spinning off. Glib, do you want to jump in ...

[Glib and LF talk and I was invited again to comment on what they had just said, which wasn't about anything much in particular as far as I could tell.]

1:10:00

CK:
...  biocentricism meant social Darwinism: eugenics  ... was that what you meant?

LF:
I give up I can't be any more clear than than I was ...

CK:
Can somebody explain to me then? I don't think people understand either. By nature do you mean nature raw in tooth and claw?

LF:
Yes, that's that that's the beginning of the Mein Kampf worldview. It's the beginning of the Dissident Right worldview. The Dissident Right is not a theistic movement. The main intellectuals of the alternative right - Richard Spencer, Greg Johnson, Jared Taylor,  Kevin Macdonald - they're all atheists. They all have a a social Darwinian perspective on life which I'm trying to see how there's any difference from that and the worldview of Mein Kampf.

CK:
Well, Mein Kampf is really more about culture and sociology even because Hitler does write knowledgeably and some compassion about how the poor used to live and and architecture and and lots of other things but you know if you read Greg Johnson's White Nationalist Manifesto, there is actually very little about culture. It's basically "I'd like to kick them out and I want to kick all of them out by 2060" and that's it. Mein Kampf is a more rewarding read. I would suggest for White Nationalists and compare what the white man was in the 1930s and what he he is now. In fact, recently I was watching these videos of these schizophrenics in lunatic asylums in America and it  struck me how articulate even these mentally ill people stuck in asylums were compared to the tongue-tied people you have now. 
It really was astonishing. Obviously, something bad has happened to to the white race and and and this catastrophic drop in in IQ and obviously it's all to do with religion in the sense that the least that a religion can make you do is make you marry before you have children and parent or children properly - that is the very least. Forget all the frilly bits like not eating pork and shellfish and that kind of thing. That's the very least your religion should do for you and and if you won't enforce that then your population will age and become stupid and weak and people will come in and take your stuff, and that's what's what's happening now.

[Luke Ford mutes me and turns to Glib again to talk about nothing much in particular.]



Stupider and sluttier
https://www.theweek.co.uk/94224/why-iq-levels-are-falling

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

Rabbi Sacks:

For a whole variety of reasons, some to do with medical developments like birth control, in vitro fertilisation and other genetic interventions, some to do with moral change like the idea that we are free to do whatever we like so long as it does not harm others, some to do with a transfer of responsibilities from the individual to the state, and other and more profound changes in the culture of the West, almost everything that marriage once brought together has now been split apart. Sex has been divorced from love, love from commitment, marriage from having children, and having children from responsibility for their care.

The result is that in Britain in 2012, 47.5 per cent of children were born outside marriage, expected to become a majority in 2016. Fewer people are marrying, those who are, are marrying later, and 42 per cent of marriages end in divorce. Nor is cohabitation a substitute for marriage. The average length of cohabitation in Britain and the United States is less than two years. The result is a sharp increase among young people of eating disorders, drug and alcohol abuse, stress related syndromes, depression and actual and attempted suicides. The collapse of marriage has created a new form of poverty concentrated among single parent families, and of these, the main burden is born by women, who in 2011 headed 92 per cent of single parent households. In Britain today more than a million children will grow up with no contact whatsoever with their fathers.

This is creating a divide within societies the like of which has not been seen since Disraeli spoke of “two nations” a century and a half ago. Those who are privileged to grow up in stable loving association with the two people who brought them into being will, on average, be healthier physically and emotionally. They will do better at school and at work. They will have more successful relationships, be happier and live longer. And yes, there are many exceptions. But the injustice of it all cries out to heaven. It will go down in history as one of the tragic instances of what Friedrich Hayek called “the fatal conceit” that somehow we know better than the wisdom of the ages, and can defy the lessons of biology and history.

 http://rabbisacks.org/love-brings-new-life-world-rabbi-sacks-institution-marriage/




2:10:00

CK:

In every nation and every government there will be in every nation every government will have a rent a mob and Antifa is our one now. 
Antifa are probably part of the Deep State. 

2:29:00

Claire, is the left simply more committed than the right?

CK:
Yes, simply because it's easier for them because they're already in charge at the top of the tree. Trump is trying very hard to dislodge them but he hasn't the manpower, I guess. There is no other big idea. I keep going on about religion simply because it has this kind of moral authority -  an instant appeal to people. If the alt-right is just about race and immigration it's not a big enough [idea]. If you wait for everybody to be affected to support you then then it'll probably be too late, so you need some Universalist idea that's capable of appealing to people but I guess the alt-right are the last people prepared to support marriage and family values.
****************************

Sexual corruption leads to moral corruption.
Moral corruption leads to intellectual corruption.
Intellectual corruption leads to your leaders not being able to submit to the truth, exercise logic or conform to the moral rules necessary for you to keep your society in existence and in good health.  

This is the only explanation I can think of for Luke's strangely obstructive behaviour when I tried to answer his questions, which the others also noticed.

IN THE COMMENTS

kissmyass682
Why'd Luke get so aggro with Claire? He went from 0 to a 100, is there some history there?

Claire Khaw
Not that I know of, except that, possibly, he didn't like the way my answer was going to his question "Is there any significant difference between the worldview of Mein Kampf and the world view of the alternative-right?"

Matvei Daniilovich
Wow, luke actually got a little triggered with Claire.

Claire Khaw
Since I never got to answer the question properly before he muted me, I can only think that it was because he did not like the direction my answer was going to his question "Is there any significant difference between the worldview of Mein Kampf and the world view of the alternative-right?"

Alejandro Black
Loved Luke’s Modafinil rage with Khaw

Claire Khaw
I don't think that was anything to do with drugs. 

Lou Duva
Very odd.

Claire Khaw
@Lou Duva I thought it was a bit odd too, but I think it was because he did not like the direction my answer to his question was going"Is there any significant difference between the worldview of Mein Kampf and the world view of the alternative-right?"  From what I can make out, Luke was implying that both Mein Kampf and the alt-right want a pogrom.  He knew I would say that the answer lies somewhere in between the status quo of liberal democracy and the pogrom the alt-right are proposing ie the civic nationalism of Secular Koranism and he didn't want me mentioning that again on his show.









at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, 12 October 2018

Why Christianity is kaput




From 2:00:00

Kevin Grace, a Catholic, on the Catholic Church and its corrupt priesthood, like maggots fattening themselves on the corpse of the Church:



Yes I urge everyone to watch this it's from The Remnant which is the traditionalist Catholic newspaper. It begins with the two different two different clips of EDM music with young people gyrating like badly. I actually thought that the technical aspect of this the dancing would be better than it was, but it looks like, you know, a bunch of kids that you'd find in any parish who, like, you know, "We're gonna put on a show tomorrow, right!" that sort of thing but the hilarious thing is you have Pope Francis sort of looking on this sagely and then you have like these aged cardinals you know in their 70s or 80s or whatever and they're clapping or trying to keep the beat and there's this one oriental Cardinal who is sadly failing to keep this very simple beat. There a you know with the the sex crimes horror, the sodomidical disaster, as I call it. Archbishop Vigano issued a challenge to the Pope and to the Vatican pointing out that the the cover-up comes from the top. Now this was several weeks ago and the Pope has yet to comment on this directly. Archbishop Marc Ouellet, Canadian said "Oh yeah it's all wrong." He didn't say exactly how it's all wrong. The Pope is now literally demonizing the people who are demanding action on the cover-up of the this sodomidical disaster: it's the devil who is responsible for this. it's the devil who is demanding answers. So in the midst of all this the Vatican is decided simple one priority is a youth Synod, a youth Synod and, as I joked earlier, if you look at this video, you can see anti Pope Francis getting down with his bad self, you know, that the kids they're all about EDM, the kids love the EDM so you know we're gonna feature that. We're not going to get anything out of the Vatican because the Pope rescued Cardinal McCarrick from the obscurity which he had been placed by the previous Pope, Pope Benedict. He had been essentially, you know, purged because he was a serial molester and Pope Francis brought him back as one of his top advisors because, you know, again, as the kids like to say, that's how he rolls.

http://www.ncregister.com/blog/edward-pentin/cardinal-ouellet-writes-open-letter-to-archbishop-vigano

Now the thinking is that there's gonna be some sort of bombshell announcement coming out of this Synod: an end to priestly celibacy, for instance, or an announcement that Catholics who have married or remarried outside the church can avail themselves of communion, or some sort of body-blow to Catholic belief and the idea is, you know, it's like Steve Sailer likes to say "Hey, look: a squirrel!" We're not going to talk about the greatest Catholic scandal at least since simony, maybe even before that because, "Oh, look, this go ahead Pope has decided that, you know, what Catholics believed in for 2,000 years is no longer applicable."

As I say, that seems to be the feeling, but there was a piece I saw on Breitbart. I don't know whether I sent it to you that quoted another Jesuit priest James Chou. James shell is a very old man very respected man and he gets to the heart of this: that the crisis in the Catholic Church goes far beyond the sodomidical disaster. The primary crisis in the Catholic churches is: Does the Catholic Church believe in anything any more? Does it believe in the doctrine which it had built up over centuries? Does the Catholic Church have any kind of internal cohesion anymore? And this is a very serious problem because there are four signs of the Catholic Church is one Holy Catholic and apostolic and increasingly, well, is it any of those things?

Catholicism is not supposed to be like Anglicanism where you have these people who believe a whole bunch of stuff and you have these people who believe in it and they all coexist together although increasingly they don't. I don't want to be too black pilled about this but I'll just say that people on the right and a lot of people are traditionalists, not so much traditionalists but conservatives. The difference between traditionalists and conservatives in the Catholic Church is that traditionalists took the position the Vatican II was a terrible mistake and perhaps heresy, and the conservatives have taken the position that well, you know, "We can work with this. Let's not throw out the baby with the bathwater." If you look at conservatism in the United States, the connections, they're really really close. Where the conservatives just getting whacked over the head over and over again and they lose every battle and "No, let's not give up, let's keep doing what we've been doing for almost 60 years and we'll live to fight another day and we'll lose that battle too" but there is less and less enthusiasm for that but the Conservatives and even some traditionalists tend to say "Well, look at how it's emptying out the churches. Look at how all these churches are being sold all over the world but particularly in the Western world. Mass attendance plunged in the 1960s or 70s and now it's disappearing and they act as if that argument is going to cut any ice with the Vatican party. I hate to break it to the Conservatives but the Vatican party considers that a feature and not a bug. The Catholic theologian Karl Rahner - a German, by the way - which is significant. He was writing about this decades ago that the idea of the Catholic Church becoming smaller and more committed. The vandals who are in charge of the Catholic Church now they want people to stop going to Mass. They want people to abandon the Catholic Church because too many of the people who are part of the Catholic Church now are not the people they want. They're not their kind of people. When Pope Francis talks about climate change or water - that seems to be his new obsession - water, you know, the people who go "Oh, please God deliver us from this. Why doesn't the Pope deal with the real problems?" Those are the people that the Pope and his a Vatican gang want out of the church now.
How are they going to pay for all this?

Maybe 80-90% of the churches will be shuttered and sold. The Roman Catholic Church owns a lot of land and the Anglican Church has been living off its land holdings for a long time. I don't know the Anglican Church is gonna be able to do that for much longer given that no one goes to their services any more except very old ladies and homosexuals. But that seems to be the Catholic plan. That seems to be the Francis plan: that we just get the right people in charge, we purge the wrong thinkers: that is to say traditional Catholics or conservative Catholics. We get rid of them and the fact that we're not getting any money from the collection plate any more for various reasons - outrage being one of them - yeah, we can just sell off these churches and live off our real estate holdings for some time to come.
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, 24 September 2018

On racial violence


http://lukeford.net/blog/?p=123687

I think one of the most interesting incidents of a pogrom was the Highland Clearances. These Christian people of the same and clan did it to each other.

Being the same nationality, looking like the perpetrators, being the same religion and in the same clan as the perpetrators ultimately offers no protection when the chips are down and the ballon goes up. The son of the first man and woman committed fratricide.

Statistically, we are still more likely to be murdered by someone we have had consensual sex with, our spouse, our parents or our children.

After all, genocide was a term that was coined after such terms as patricide, matrricide, sororicide, fratricide, filicide, mariticide and unxoricide were invented.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_types_of_killing

Even now there is no word, as far as I know, for murder of a citizen by illegal immigrant of another race and religion. 

Good government and good laws are the only protection we have.
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, 13 August 2018

Is there a categorical error at the heart of White Nationalism?



I was hoping we would discuss the following in this stream, but this didn't quite happen. I joined the stream and said what was on my mind and then fell asleep.


When I woke up I found I had been removed from the hangout. It was basically 5 hours of complaining about antifa from what I could make of it.  

I suspect I was removed because the white nationalists who tuned into listen were in no mood for discussing the finer points of nationalism and Luke was probably right to avoid antagonising them by discussing whether their aspiration towards peoplehood is somehow illegitimate because they share no common religion. It is an important subject, but the audience on this stream would have been unreceptive to the views, especially of non-whites on white nationalism denying them their peoplehood and pointing out the categorical error at the heart of White Nationalism.





One the more interesting things said about me in the chat was by one Blake Anderson around 56:00 saying:

Claire you come across like a therapist. This comes across as condescending.

It was intended as a criticism, but I take it as a compliment.  



It has actually been my intention to put white people on the couch.  

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/on-the-couch

Have white people reached a stage where they can bear neither their vices nor their cure?

If the problem is matriarchy, then patriarchy must be the cure.

If the destination is patriarchy, theocracy must be the vehicle.

https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/96RQWJV

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/05/secular-koranism.html


at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, 1 July 2018

Alt Right Torah - Parasha Pinchas (Num. 25-30)



From the 36th minute - me on free speech. You have a right to abuse people, but people have the right not to invite you into their home.

It is unAmerican not to have First amendment rights any more.

From 1:26 the only way to have nationalism is to have a one party state and scrap representative democracy. The only countries that enjoy national sovereignty and have an independent foreign policy are one party states eg China, Iran and Russia (which is a de facto one party state though it technically a representative democracy). The Deep State, the Praetorian Guard, the lobbyists, the national interest.


We have to work within the rules first, as Trump did, before we can change the rules.


From 1:49 on Phineas

Vigilantism, due process, strong decisive action, proceeding boldly and cautiously and wisely.




Whether the end justifies the means and what the rules are. 

2:05  Morally-compromised Jewish men and the Moabite women.  

2:06  S&M

2:07  Pain with pleasure heightens the pleasure 

Luke discusses Jewish sex, Republican sex, Democrat sex and tells us the difference. 

2:13  The pleasures of submitting to an overwhelming force in sex and religion
http://aboutislam.net/spirituality/prostration-the-ultimate-position-of-humility/

2:18  The legal position of porn and erotica under Secular Koranism  
at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Monday, 18 June 2018

Accused of being a disingenuous liar and a scoundrel because I didn't announce *at the very beginning* that I was as Secular Koranist



http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/06/an-emotional-discussion-about-secular.html was when I first discussed it with them.



God and Nations

God (if He exists) is Darwinian

Religion and Nationalism

BNP Letter of Expulsion

TRANSCRIPT OF WHAT I SAID ON THE VICTORIA DERBYSHIRE SHOW THAT GOT ME EXPELLED FROM THE BNP
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/07/transcript-of-what-i-said-on-victoria.html

REFERENCES TO HELP YOU UNDERSTAND BETTER WHAT WAS DISCUSSED

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/12/17/french-bar-tells-women-isnt-paris-men/ was the story about the female activists being made to leave the cafe in Paris that Ecce was talking about.

Up to 180,000 people a year could be paid resettlement grants of £50,000 to leave "overcrowded" Britain under the BNP's immigration policy, the party's leader Nick Griffin said today.

He stressed this would be a voluntary programme for those who were not defined as White British.

Mr Griffin also said the country's doors would be shut, except to those immigrants whose entry would suit the UK, such as physicists with specialist skills.


The exchange Adassamad Clarke and Claire Khaw had on Secular Koranism

Abdassamad Clarke the Muslim scholar blocks Claire Khaw from his Facebook page

How is heaven described in the Koran


"Christianity, Islam, and Judaism are the Abrahamic religions with the greatest numbers of adherents. Abrahamic religions with fewer adherents include the faiths descended from Yazdânism (the Yezidi, Yarsani and Alevi faiths), Samaritanism, the Druze faith (often classified as a branch of Isma'ili Shia Islam), Bábism, the Bahá'í Faith and Rastafari."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abrahamic_religions

It doesn't matter whether you are Lebanon or Singapore, if you let in enough aliens they are going to change things. But why did you let them in in the first place? It is the logical inevitability of empire to become international and multiracial, because it is the nature of empire to annex the nations of other races. You can only acquire empire by invading the nations of other races. When this happens enough, the original people will find themselves a minority. This happened to the Romans too.

What I proposed about infanticide is already being done
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/02/what-i-propose-is-already-being-done.html


When the Torah says “an eye for an eye”, the Talmud explains this is not taken literally but means monetary compensation must be paid for an injury.  When the Torah specifies the death penalty of stoning, the Talmud explains it meant the offender was hurled down from a high place – rather than pelted with stones.


ABROGATION IN THE KORAN
Any revelation We cause to be superseded or forgotten, We replace with something better or similar. Do you [Prophet] not know that God has power over everything?  

When We substitute one revelation for another, – and Allah knows best what He reveals (in stages),– they say, "Thou art but a forger": but most of them understand not.

It doesn't matter whether you are Lebanon or Singapore, if you let in enough aliens they are going to change things. But why did you let them in in the first place? It is the logical inevitability of empire to become international and multiracial, because it is the nature of empire to annex the nations of other races. You can only acquire empire by invading the nations of other races. When this happens enough, the original people will find themselves a minority. This happened to the Romans too.

JEFFERSON, THE CONSTITUTION AND THE QURAN: WHY THE FOUNDING FATHER'S DEFENSE OF MUSLIMS IS REALLY IMPORTANT TODAY


Nazi Germany’s leaders also harbored half-baked ideas about messaging to North Africa’s Muslims. Heinrich Himmler was the Third Reich’s most influential advocate of the instrumental use of Islam in war strategy. In the spring of 1943, as Field Marshal Erwin Rommel’s army in North Africa stumbled to defeat, Himmler asked the Reich Security Head Office “to find out which passages of the Qur’an provide Muslims with the basis for the opinion that the Führer has already been forecast in the Qur’an and that he has been authorized to complete the work of the Prophet.”

KEVIN GRACE CHALLENGES ME ON SECULAR KORANISM
at No comments:
Labels: , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...