Translate

Showing posts with label Paul Gottfried. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Paul Gottfried. Show all posts

Wednesday, 2 September 2020

Why reject Islam if you are a gentile who wants to worship the Abrahamic God without idolatry?



Lawrence Auster
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Auster

3:00  Only self-hating Jews ignorant of their own traditions would convert to Christianity.

4:00  NON-ISLAM THEORIES OF ISLAMIC EXTREMISM
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/009044.html

5:00  Islams socially conservative values are the antithesis of liberalism.

6:00  Lawrence Auster was a Jewish Islamophobe who converted to Anglicanism.

10:00  Are Jews white?

13:00  HOROWITZ EXPELS ME FROM FRONTPAGE
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/007752.html

The Truth of Interracial Rape in the United States
https://archive.vn/20120525180222/http://frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=26368

David Horowitz Shuns a Race-Baiter
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/david-horowitz-shuns-a-ra_b_47872

32:00  Lawrence Auster must have been an atheist even though he converted to Chrsitianity.
33:00  Understanding the worldview of an observant Jew
34:00  Minorities wanting to assimilate into the dominant culture
36:00  Leibniz
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Best_of_all_possible_worlds
37:00  Thanking God for Misfortune and Deliverance
Mikeitz (Genesis 41:1-44:17)
https://www.aish.com/tp/i/oai/48944551.html
48:00  Jay
50:00  People who call themselves Muslims while promoting LGBT rights are ignorant people who don't know the Koran while claiming to be Muslim.

People who confuse a book he will never read with brown people he knows he hates

51:00  Muslims are also punished when they don't follow their own rules.

52:00  No religion, no group solidarity. No group solidarity, no male co-operation to deal with uncontrolled immigration.

Why do atheists always complain about Jews and Muslims who have their religion? Why can't they put two and two together and make four? The reason Jews and Muslims get treated better than atheist plebs is because of the protective wrapper of their religion.

55:00  The narrative of the Abrahamic God

56:00  Westerners who keep insisting that Islam is violent obviously do not know the burned and bloody history of Christianity. Christians had a continent-wide European Wars of Religion. When they settled in America they had their American Civil War. Christians started WW1 and WW2. Christians also bombed non-combatant civilians in two Japanese cities. If there is a WW3, it would be started by people claiming to be Christian.

57:00  The socio-historical analysis of the decline of Western civilisation

58:00  Paul Gottfried was unable to have a full and frank discussion about Islam with his fellow Jew Lawrence Auster who was clearly getting frustrated with him. Auster believed that Islam was in itself a threat to the West while Gottfried said he rejected that view because he hated neocons so much that he would reject anything neocons said including the existential threat Islam posed. He only finds educated and Westernised Muslims bearable.

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/010314.html

"I never deny that Muslims are vile or that I would be delighted to be rid of them."

59:00  Gottfried must have forgotten everything he ever learned about Judaism from Yeshiva University and is now an atheist. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yeshiva_University

1:00:00  Diaspora Jews like Halsey English and Paul Gottfried are too frightened to tell their fellow Americans that Christianity is kaput, but they have a religious duty to do so as Chosen People.

There is no prospect of a Christian revival in our lifetimes even if we were all born yesterday. 

1:02:00  The Seven Noahide Laws
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-seven-noachide-laws


  1. If you believe the Abrahamic God created the Universe and is in control of every aspect of it, you would have to believe, as Leibniz did, that everything happens for a reason.
  2. If you believe that God first revealed the Torah to Jews, you would have to believe that the beginning of wisdom is the fear of God. 
  3. If you believe in the Abrahamic God, you would have to believe that Jews are God's Chosen People and no mortal has the right to take their status away, however much Jews are hated by gentiles.
  4. The Koran acknowledges that Jews are God's Chosen People.
  5. The Koran acknowledges the right of Jews to reside in Israel.  
  6. Antisemites cannot answer the question "If Jews are not God's Chosen People, who is?"
  7. Antisemites are acknowledging the existence of Jews, even as they hate them.  
  8. Love them or hate them, no one can deny the existence of Jews. 
  9. Love them or hate them, Jews are the world's most ancient and powerful tribe.
  10. If God is indeed omnipotent then He would have created a logical universe. 
  11. If Jews are God's Chosen People, they were chosen for a purpose and that purpose was to Noahidise gentiles. 
  12. Jews are not allowed to assimilate until and unless they have Noahidised gentiles. 
  13. The quickest way of Jews Noahidising gentiles is to acknowledge that Islam is the most Noahide observant of all gentile religions and Christianity the least.
  14. Jews refuse to perform their religious duty to the gentile now, because that would draw attention to the fact that they have omitted to do this duty since the late Middle Ages when they declared that it was permissible for Christians to be Christians even though their religion is undeniably blasphemous and idolatrous. 
  15. Christianity is offensive to God because of its idolatry and blasphemy. 
  16. The corrupt priesthood of Christianity who never believed in Trinity are happy to carry on pretending that they do because they rely on the continued existence of Christianity for their status and income. 
  17. The corrupt priesthood of Christianity are in fact atheist or they would be wise and fear God and His wrath after 2000 years of idolatry and blasphemy.
  18. Both Judaism and Islam would see Christianity as idolatry and blasphemy.  
  19. All it takes now for Christianity to be well and truly exposed for its clay feet is for Jews and Muslims to jointly point out the idolatry and blasphemy of Christianity. 
  20. Christians cannot deny their idolatry because the Doctrine of the Trinity defines Christianity and the narrative in the New Testament is that Christ was convicted by the Sanhedrin of blasphemy when he said his papa was Hashem Himself. 
  21. The narrative in the Koran is that Christ did not die on the cross and it only appeared so, letting Jews off the hook of being Christ-killers. 
  22. The Koran accepts the Christ as a prophet of God and even the Virgin Birth as a way of meeting Christians halfway. 
  23. Secular Koranism is a legal system, not a belief system. This means no one is required to believe in anything because quran.com/2/256 which is the basis of the First Amendment guarantees freedom of belief. 
1:04:00  Jay's scripture is written by a non-Christian called Emmet Fox.  

1:07:00  The people antisemites and Islamophobes are always complaining about - Jews and Muslims - have the protective wrapper of a religion which they clearly lack. 

1:08:00  Lawrence Auster was sincere about his hatred and fear of Islam. 

1:09:00  If Christianity is indeed working, then Christians would be considered higher status than Jews and Muslims in the West, but the opposite is the case and Christians are in fact despised. Christianity is actually such a failure that plebeian antisemites and Islamophobes have turned to neo-paganism because they reject all the Abrahamic faiths which they believe to be "Jew-created". The shame and humiliation they feel when they realised that their ancestors were either forcibly converted or tricked into worshipping a Jew on a stick can only be resolved by becoming Buddhist or Hindu or a militant atheist, it seems. 

1:10:00  We can only have Secular Torahism or Secular Koranism. 

1:11:00  It is impossible to have a secular version of the New Testament.  

1:12:00  Secular Koranism is a legal system.  

1:13:00  There is no rule of law in the New Testament.  

1:14:00  Bhagavad Gita

1:15:00  There is no rule of law in Hinduism.  

1:19:00  The cure exists before the onset of the disease from 32:00

1:26:00  The nature and purpose of religion

1:27:00  Jay gives himself away when he talks about standing shoulder to shoulder to God as if He were a comrade or an equal. 

1:28:00  The nature and purpose of religion

1:29:00  The moral imperative of religion for your society

1:30:00  Is the true purpose of religion to get us to heaven?

1:31:00  Keeping the group in existence and apart from others.

1:32:00  Imperial religions

1:33:00  When WASPs finally won the Wars of the Reformation

1:34:00  Iran and China's Mandate of Heaven

1:36:00  If we had a rational absolute monarch with imperial ambitions, he would use Secular Koranism to control us rather than Christianity because it is too high-maintenance requiring 

a)  compulsion for church attendance
b)  people to pretend to believe that they believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God who created the Universe
c) a priesthood to trick and threaten people into pretending to believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God who created the Universe 

1:39:00  The West must be better at transgender operations now than Iran. 

1:40:00  There is no political will for a Christian revival since virtually all Western politicians are atheists. 

1:41:00  The cure already exists for the idolatry and blasphemy of Christianity. Gentiles can repent with Islam or at the very least Secular Koranism.  

Analysing a conversation between two Jews (Paul Gottfried and Lawrence Auster) on Islam


2:00  Islam is Monotheism III.

Not even Christians claim the New Testament was written by Christ, let alone God.
3:00  How should we choose the religion of our country?
4:00  We cannot tell which religion is true.
5:00  Choosing a religion is a moral and political choice.
6:00  The religion with the most powerful God
7:00  An imperial religion
8:00  How is going to church going to help your political activism?
9:00  The burned and bloody history of Christianity

10:00  The Founding Fathers were in fact proto-Muslim.
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2020/09/is-that-shining-city-on-hill-in-fact.html

11:00  Christians executed heretics who denied that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God who created the Universe. They were also antisemitic and haters of the Semitic religions ie Judaism and Islam. They hated the two other branches of the Abrahamic faiths because Jews and Muslims refused to believe in their idolatrous and blasphemous nonsense cooked up by a bunch of bishops called to Nicaea by an emperor that wasn't even Christian. 

12:00  The way Jews and Christians define themselves

13:00  If a Jew's wife's conversion was not complete before her first child was born but was complete by the time her second was born, the first child would have to undergo a conversion while subsequent offspring would not.

15:00  Rule-based Judaism is a stronger religion than Christianity whose narrative is absurd, idolatrous and blasphemous.

16:00  God revealed the Torah for Jews and the Koran for gentiles. Not even Christians claim that the New Testament was written by Christ, let alone God. Not only are Christians idolatrous and blasphemous, their scripture is undeniably inferior in conception to the Torah and the Koran.

17:00  The Torah and the Koran are the directly revealed Word of God (ie direct evidence of God's existence if you accept the premise that God revealed the Torah and the Koran to mankind), but the New Testament is mere hearsay (ie what Matthew, Mark, Luke and John - mortal fallible men - claim to have witnessed). 

Hearsay
https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/justice/evidence/hearsay_evidence.html

22:00  No rule of law can be found in the New Testament.

23:00  AN EXCHANGE WITH PAUL GOTTFRIED ON ISLAMO-FASCISM AND ISLAM
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/010314.html

24:00  Why do atheists complain about being threatened with hell? 

25:00  If your religion were working properly, your government would be governing properly. If your government were governing properly, you would not be complaining about terrorism being committed by victims of your foreign policy. 

27:00  Paul Gottfried:

"I never deny that Muslims are vile or that I would be delighted to be rid of them."

28:00  Your enemy may not be lying all the time. 

29:00  What is the Western culture and what is the Western way of life?

30:00  Plebeian Islamophobes

31:00  Muslims represent the immigrant group xenophobes most hate and fear. 

33:00  The definition of fascism

34:00  Is feminism is fascism?

35:00  Could Global Man be a Secular Koranist?
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrIzHV8LRrVQC-dk-HGZDDA

39:00  Lawrence Auster: "Islam is a threat."
Paul Gottfried: "We should send Muslims back to whence they came even if Islam is not a threat."

43:00  Islamophobes at Chronicles
https://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/about/#staff

Paul Gottfried:

When I was in Israel, I met no one who sounded as passionately anti-Islamic as you are; the only people who share the depth of your antipathy are the Catholic converts at Chronicles and the Serb nationalist Trifkovich. 

Edward Welsch



Clearly, they would rather talk to each other in their Islamophobic way than talk to me. Edward Welsch is a Catholic convert. Christians are terrified and avoid me like the plague because they know I would be gunning for their Trinity which they know, deep down, is morally and intellectually indefensible. Not even a Sistine Chapel stuffed with Cardinals longing to be Pope would be able to defend the Trinity against charges of blasphemy and idolatry. 

American dinosaurs talk about being "paleocon"

44:00  Is Islam a threat to the West? If so, how and why?

49:00  Fallacy of composition = category error
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_composition

53:00

Mencius Moldbug writes:

It’s a pleasure to see you debating PG—my two favorite paleo intellectuals.May I suggest that the problem is that the two of you are operating under different definitions of “Islam”? Professor Gottfried appears to be using the conventional American usage, in which a “Muslim” is anyone who says he’s a Muslim. You appear to be discussing the actual tenets of orthodox Islam.

I forget who said that in America there are Protestant Protestants, Protestant Catholics, and Protestant Jews. Likewise, I suspect the good professor’s “moderate Muslims” are Protestant Muslims. Or to be more exact, Unitarian Muslims. That is, they consider themselves Muslim, but their general outlook on life is not much different from that of the average “Stuff White People Like” intellectual fashion victim.

A Protestant Islam is the great fantasy of our multiculturalist (ie, Unitarian) masters. In the Unitarian worldview, the only reason that all Muslims do not instantly convert to Unitarianism (while remaining, of course, Muslims) is the “hate” they encounter from those, such as you and Professor Gottfried, who have not yet submitted to multiculturalism. The resemblance between this strategy and Ann Coulter’s plan for solving the Muslim Problem (“invade their countries, kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity”) is rather striking, I find.

This is why the actual tenets of Islam don’t matter to progressives (ie, Unitarians). It’s because, in the glorious future in which everyone is a Unitarian, there will be no Islam. There will only be “Muslims,” who pray to the One God who is named Allah, and perhaps preserve some of their colorful native rituals.

56:00  Peter Andrew Nolan
https://avoiceformen.com/featured/peter-andrew-nolanc-a-danger-to-self-and-others/

58:00  Restoring the patriarchy

1:00:00  Unmarriageable Western men who are atheists would not want to restore the patriarchy because they are not prepared to make the sacrifices required of men ie raising the price of sex to establish and maintain the patriarchy.

1:01:00  Muslim terrorism

1:02:00  Suicide bombing began in Sri Linka
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_bombings_in_Sri_Lanka

1:03:00  Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his assassin were both Christian. Christians started two World Wars. Christians nuked two Japanese cities of civilian non-combatants. Christians fought the American Civil War. Christians fought the English Civil War. Christians fought the Wars of the Reformation and the European Wars of Religion as well as the Wars of European Unification. Christians started the French Revolution and the Revolutions of 1848. No other religion had a continent-wide war of religion. Sounds like Christians are the most militarily aggressive religion of all and this was why they were so good at war and acquired a global empire. But they hate and fear Muslims for a few acts of terrorism after they were traumatised from being the victims of Western foreign policy. These Christians can dish it out, but they can't take it when the slipper is on the other foot. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archduke_Franz_Ferdinand_of_Austria
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_wars_of_religion

1:09:00  Mike Buchanan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Buchanan_(politician)

1:11:00

Paul Gottfried is just as opposed to Islam as you are, but he’s more afraid of the untold damage the neocons have done to this great nation and will continue to do if allowed to exploit the Islamic threat with the same non-solutions that the Republican party is championing namely their invade the world and invite the world policies. It’s quite simply Gottfried understands that the existential threat to the West isn’t Islam, it’s the West.

1:12:00  Invade and invite the world!

1:13:00  Neoconservatism = American imperialism

1:14:00  Paleocons = social conservatism

Neoconservatism = foreign policy

Paleoconservatism = social policy

1:15:00  Patriarchy

1:16:00  Feminism has destroyed the patriarchy. 

1:17:00  Chinese ancestor worship
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2016/04/how-to-become-hungry-ghost.html

1:19:00  The reality of obtaining and maintaining an empire

1:20:00  People not knowing who they are or what they are supposed to be doing

1:22:00  Patriarchy is threatening to matriarchy. 

1:23:00  Secular Koranism

1:27:00  A legal system is not a belief system. Secular Koranism is not a religion but a rule system. 

1:28:00  Feminised men who want to be in their cosy little Christian circles

1:29:00  Christianity is kaput. 

1:30:00  What happens when your religion is kaput

1:31:0   A POTUS who is also a nationalist

1:32:00  Widespread illegitimacy is evidence that the patriarchy has been destroyed.

How We Ended Up With 40 Percent of Children Born Out of Wedlock
https://ifstudies.org/blog/how-we-ended-up-with-40-percent-of-children-born-out-of-wedlock

Analysing a conversation between two Jews (Paul Gottfried and Lawrence Auster) about white guilt



Lawrence Auster
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Auster

Paul Gottfried
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Gottfried

7:00  BLACK RACIAL PREFERENCES AT ANNAPOLIS; AND A CONVERSATION WITH PAUL GOTTFRIED ABOUT WHITE GUILT, JEWS AND PROTESTANTS
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/013467.html

8:00  "a perversion of Christianity"

Why blame Christianity when affirmative action is obviously unfair whether you are Christian or not?

11:00  Who is a serious thinker these days?

13:00  "Boasian Envrionmentalism" creates white guilt.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boasian_anthropology

16:00  Franz Boas
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Boas

17:00  The identity crisis of Franz Boas
Historical Particularism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_particularism

23:00  Gottfried thinks Christianity is the cause of self-abnegating white guilt. I disagree.

24:00  WASPs are doing it to themselves more than Catholics and Jews.

28:00

"The Jews, whose collective and individual psyche is not guilty under liberalism (since in the liberal world view Jews are victims and the champions of victims), have psychological power and self-confidence and thus are not true liberals."

30:00

"True liberals, who incarnate the Freudian death wish, yearn for the extinction of their ancestral group."

33:00  The imperial origins of white guilt

35:00  White guilt for nuking civilian non-combatants of Nagasaki and Hiroshima

36:00  Britain's loss of its global empire after one too many imperial wars was America's gain.

38:00  Demoblisiation - the British government softened up returned British soldiers with wine, women, song and the welfare state.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demobilization

41:00  Young people are full of moronic whynottery,

47:00  Deval Patrick
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deval_Patrick

53:00  Christians are not told not to marry non-Christians.

56:00  The moral superiority of liberals over racists

57:00  The changing principles of the parties of the Donkey and Elephant

58:00  A Theory of Justice by John Rawls
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Theory_of_Justice

1:01:00  "Untrammelled liberalism"

https://www.brucefleming.net/pages/nyt

1:06:00  Christianity is kaput and its replacement is obvious. 

1:11:00  Protestantism won the Wars of the Reformation.

1:12:00  Can any society do without a religion?

1:14:00  What is the purpose of religion?

1:15:00  No Christian will engage with me.

1:16:00  How would going to church when you didn't before or going to a different to church change the laws of your country? Changing the law is the essence of political activism.

1:17:00  Old men in their 80s are probably not interested in radical and fundamental change. The dishonourable are probably not about to admit any omission on their part.

1:18:00  Why isn't Gottfried capable of discussing the failure of Christianity with me or anyone?

1:19:00  Jay's answer to the nature and purpose of religion

1:20:00  Can any society do without a religion?

1:21:00  How do you know when your religion has failed?

1:22:00  Moral cowardice, intellectual dishonesty or deliberate suppression?

1:23:00  Christianity was meant to fail.  

1:24:00  Christianity suffers from having an obviously inferior scripture.  

1:25:00  Christianity has no rule of law. What  they keep thinking is Christian is in fact Jewish.  

1:26:00  Conservatives and Liberalism would be unable to agree an official handbook of either even if you locked them up in the Sistine Chapel and deprived them of food and drink until they do.

1:27:00  Jews won't tell Christians Christianity is kaput because they don't want to forfeit the support for Israel they would otherwise receive from Christian Zionists.

1:28:00  Jews should recommend Secular Koranism to Christians and Post-Christians because Islam is the most Noahide of all gentile religions and Christianity the least, being both idolatrous and blasphemous.



Q. Salaam Rabbi. Have you made any comment on the UAE- Israel deal? How do you feel about it?
A. Wa aleikum salaam wa...
Posted by Ben Abrahamson on Tuesday, 18 August 2020


1:29:00  The swamp of intellectual dishonesty and moral cowardice that goes from Left to Right, atheist to monotheist, young to old, men to women

1:32:00  Paul Gottfried should be able to talk about the nature and purpose of religion even if he cannot bring himself to discuss Secular Koranism, Islam or the failure of Christianity.

1:33:00  White American guilt is caused by the British inadvertently handing their global empire to the Americans on a platter after they "won" WW2. They are also probably feeling guilty about their incompetence and inability to administer it properly because of their immaturity. They are basically adolescents in arrested adolescence who have slipped into dementia without passing through adulthood. To get themselves on an even keel, they must replace their failed religion and their failed political system with a one-party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism and in this way be the shining city on the Islamic hill, finally fulfilling the destiny of American exceptionalism. 

Is that shining city on the hill in fact Muslim?
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2020/09/is-that-shining-city-on-hill-in-fact.html

1:34:00  Paul Gottfried is shy of pointing out in no uncertain terms that Christianity is kaput but I am not. I would love to explain how and why, but Cotto-Gottfried have so far not invited me on their channel to challenge Secular Koranism. 

Tuesday, 1 September 2020

My challenge to Paul Gottfried and to anyone who still identifies as Conservative or Liberal

https://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/blog/conservatives-foolishly-play-the-diversity-game/?FromReview=Y&mguid=25d1e08a-4e99-47c8-866f-fafffbcf856a

Conservatism is now a meaningless term as meaningless as Liberalism.  To call oneself a Conservative or a Liberal is to identify oneself as a political dinosaur. To be a nationalist is to want government in the national interest. Once nationalism has been rehabilitated and generally accepted that nationalism is government in the national interest, it will be easier to argue against liberal policies. How is uncontrolled immigration in the national interest of any nation?  If people fear the racism, xenophobia and antisemitism of 20th century old school nationalism, it can easily be explained to them that racism, xenophobia and antisemitism is not in the national interest either.  If Hitler and Mussolini did not quite know what was in the national interest of their countries who suffered military defeat as a result of their imperial wars, then it is easily argued that nationalism does not mean waging imperial wars that end in the defeat and disaster of your country. Britain who fell into its Thucydides Trap again in WW2, did not fare well either. Most people do not know what is good for them, and neither do most nations if they think that can remain unguided by God in matters of government and foreign policy. It should be noted that WW1 and WW2 were waged for unIslamic reasons. How prepared is Chronicles to discuss whether the Founding Fathers were in fact proto-Muslims? 

Wednesday, 15 April 2020

No, the Declaration of Independence really is not all that important.



1:00 The American Declaration of Independence is mere puffery, as the Victorians would say.

The US constitution was written a whole decade after the American Declaration of Independence.

4:00 The proposition that all men are created equal comes from the French Revolution.

5:00 The pursuit of happiness was the second draft after it was thought that the pursuit of property made Americans seem like a bunch of unprincipled landgrabbers. However, it was the idea that the pursuit of happiness was in some way acceptable led to America becoming a land of hedonism steeped in sin. Why not substitute "justice" for "happiness"? That could turn America into a nation of moral and political philosophers away from the morbidly obese transgender and gaily married people they have now become.

5:30 The American Civil War was an American War of Unification. That is why Lincoln is now deified and sits like Zeus upon his throne in the Lincoln Memorial. Will future archaeologists one day conclude that the Americans worshipped their presidents when they discover the enormous idols at Mount Rushmore? "The ones we have found were the good ones, we suppose, but after indulging in their sin of President Worship, their Presidents got worse and worse until their civilisation became extinct after they all died of the Chinese flu."

7:00 Is equality democracy? Equal before God, was all it meant when the declaration said men were created equal, surely? Does either the Bible or the Koran deny the moral validity of patriarchal hierarchy? (Patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers where beta males choose an alpha male to be their leader to protect their interests as married fathers. Suffrage is denied to women because they already get to choose their husbands who will provide and protect them. Otherwise, their fathers are to protect and provide for them. A matriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers who casually conceived and parented their illegitimate offspring. As you can imagine, such a society would be dysgenic, rife with social parasites and NEETs that need to be bribed with UBI, extramarital sex and the option of becoming transgender to keep them quiescent and sexually occupied under their matriarchy. The sexually sated male is politically inert. This explains why no white man in a senior position in the Western political establishment will raise the alarm against the matriarchy or even use the term. The perfect patriarchy - 100% married parents. The perfect matriarchy - 100% unmarried parents. The West is now a matriarchy.)

9:00 How many times has the US constitution been amended?

9:30 Have you considered using the Koran as the basis of your constitution?

13:00 Legal positivism

14:00 Should the Overton Window be smashed?

15:00 Natural law is divine law and divine law is God's law. This can only mean the Abrahamic God and there are only two revelations: the Torah for Jews and the Koran for gentiles. The New Testament is clearly insufficient for any society to base its laws on. This was clearly the message Thomas Jefferson intended to convey when he compiled the Jefferson Bible.

17:00 Rights can only be legal rights and legal rights can be created or destroyed overnight. The only legal rights that have divine protection are divine laws and to have the benefit of divine laws we would have to live in a theocracy where belief in God is general.

18:00 " ... all men are created equal" [by God, if you believe in Him]. If you don't believe in God, then you wouldn't obey His laws. God's laws are contained in the Torah which is for Jews, and in the Koran which is for gentiles. If Americans believe in equality, then they must also logically and necessarily believe in God who created them equal. If they do indeed believe in God, then they must also believe that He made laws for them to follow. Therefore any law in America that is not in harmony with God's laws for gentiles should be repealed. The First Amendment was based on quran.com/2/256

As Nietzsche says, interpretation is not a function of truth but that of power.

21:00 Entailed rights are traditional rights and traditions become sacred with the passage of time.

24:00 Neo-liberalism is the economic arm of the American empire and neoconservatism its military arm.

29:00 "Interpretation is not a function of truth, but that of power." Why are Conservatives incapable of formulating arguments against Liberal positions? Or is it cowardice that prevents them from articulating these arguments?

33:00 The matriarchy is irrational, which is why it is a danger to itself. It is time to admit that the West is now a matriarchy.

43:00 Fox News ain't what it was.

48:00 Is it time to admit that both Conservatism and Christianity are kaput?

Tuesday, 14 April 2020

"America no longer has a macro-culture that is accepted from sea to shining sea"



47:00  "If only we had a decent Conservative movement," says Gottfried. But Conservatism was only ever a defensive ideology to protect European nations against the ideas of the French Revolution. Conservatism was only intended to be "Theocracy Lite". However, since it became OK to deny the Trinity without being charged with blasphemy and since the Americans quarantined the church from their state in the early 1800s, Christianity began to die. It has taken Christianity 200 years to die. It is now finally dead. Its death certificate needs to be signed by Jews and Muslims and the significance of its death discussed by those who might wish to become married parents in order to parent their legitimate offspring properly. Since no one is interested in marriage, family values and good parenting any more, no government trusts itself to raise these matters with an electorate who have for generations regarded the right to have extramarital sex as a human right. To address these issues, indiscriminate universal suffrage and representative democracy would have to be abolished amongst other things, but no one in the alt-right quite dares discuss this either.

1:03:00  The Conservatives are like the deserving poor falling over themselves to dissociate themselves from the undeserving poor whom they probably call "the criminal classes". The alt-right are perceived to be the dregs of society being seen as unmarriageable and unemployable low status social retards considered physically repulsive by white upper middle class college educated women who instinctively despise marginalised men in the classes below them. Women are after all hypergamous. Unfortunately for these men who are in fact unemployable and unmarriageable, they have no longer have a societal purpose and have no one in the political establishment who will defend their interests. Being atomised men incapable of ever co-operating with each other to achieve anything because they do not even want a leader, nothing can be done for them. It is well known that no beta male will submit to the leadership of another beta male, and any male with alpha male leadership qualities would disdain to risk anything for them since these degenerates are known only for their stupidity, social retardation, mental illness, drink and drug-dependence as well as their disloyalty. Also, to be associated with the alt-right or even to make noises sympathetic to these men now means social death, loss of income, employment and reputation.

1:19:00  "Fractured America no longer has a macro-culture that is accepted from sea to shining sea".

Even tribes need a moral system and the only moral system that would keep a group in existence and apart from others is religion.  Religions worth their salt would be political ideologies and narratives promoting patriarchal moral values because only under a patriarchy would there be enough good strong men be produced to defend the national interest.

1:25:00  I define nationalism as government in the national interest. Is there any Western moral or political philosopher capable of discussing this?

Monday, 13 April 2020

A very interesting discussion on antisemitism


Luke Ford is a Jewish convert whose late father was the Seventh Day Adventist theologian Desmond Ford. His father's career was blighted for a mysterious theological reason I am simply quite unable to understand even though I am keenly interested in theology and tried to get my head round the subject. In the end I gave up concluding that it is in fact impossible to understand the nonsense that is Christian theology. I wonder if Luke, who has had his life blighted by this feature of his parentage understands it either. In any case, he saw fit to reject the absurdity of Christianity to embrace a religion that he thought would give him the protection and status he craved. In the West, Christianity is despised by Westerners who regard all religion as patently absurd because theirs is patently absurd and has indeed failed. Luke's innate sense of snobbery and racism prevented him from considering Islam for a moment because he saw Judaism as giving him the social cache he had always craved while Islam represented everything he and others like him in the alt-right hate and fear: uncool low status immigrant culture.

https://www.ministrymagazine.org/archive/1980/10/statement-on-desmond-ford-document
https://atoday.org/how-des-ford-changed-us-why-des-had-to-go/
https://atoday.org/part-2-how-the-church-changed-because-of-desmond-ford/
https://atoday.org/is-desmond-ford-really-the-dark-lord-of-adventism/
https://www.adventistreview.org/remembering-desmond-ford
https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1559&context=jats
https://religionnews.com/2019/03/12/desmond-ford-90-adventist-theologian-defrocked-for-controversial-beliefs-dies/
https://spectrummagazine.org/article/2016/01/13/desmond-fords-new-book-recalls-conflict-over-sanctuary-doctrine-dismissal-adventi
https://www.adventistbiblicalresearch.org/materials/independent-ministries-and-others/abcs-dr-desmond-fords-theology
https://thecompassmagazine.com/blog/why-desmond-ford-was-wrong-about-the-sanctuary-part-1

Hatred of gentiles by Jews is called loxism.

The Dissident Right seems quite unable to formulate rational and coherent arguments on anything, it seems.

The alt-right are low education, low-information and low status white men whose behaviour and demeanour makes women in the classes above them think they deserve to suffer. For this reason, it is easy to guilt by association anyone associated with them, including myself of course, though I share none of their characteristics. Presumably, this is to serve as a warning to others who wish to take up the cause of nationalism, which I define as government in the national interest - an abstract concept the white urban proletariat with their woefully inadequate state education are woefully ill-equipped to discuss. Because these men have no one in power prepared to defend their interests, the matriarchy consisting of spoilt and entitled college-educated white middle class women will always regard these unmarriageable and unemployable social retards with unvarnished horror triggered by the thought that any member of their sex might have to marry any of these low status low education unemployable and unmarriageable men.

Because of the welfare state, these men of the former working class no longer have a societal purpose other than be seen as a burden on the state to be bribed with extramarital sex, transgenderism to induce them to self-sterilise and UBI to keep them quiescent while warehoused for extinction. In the meantime, foreign workers are imported to do the work the formerly working classes were meant to do. It makes no sense at all, unless the purpose is to keep this whole shebang of representative democracy under indiscriminate universal suffrage going. China and Russia have been dropping gentle but unmistakable hints for Western nations to take democracy out with the trash and bury its stinking rotten corpse for a few years now. However, because the entire Western political establishment is in denial, the message has not been understood or absorbed, let alone implemented. I seem to be the only one prepared to discuss these things, but there appears to be a conspiracy of white men conspiring to deprive me of the oxygen of publicity. 

29:00  E Michael Jones blames everything but everything on Jews, even the bad policies of Catholic Irish American Democrats.

35:00  Jews are not protected if they associate with the Right.  There is a political litmus test.

39:00  "Reasonable and responsible questions"

40:00  E Michael Jones described as "a total crank".  The comedian Owen Benjamin is not worth wasting time on, says Cotto.

1:07:00  Gottfried praises Hitler's writing ability.

1:14:00  Assimilated German Jews who were German nationalists

1:18:00  Italian Jews who joined Mussolini's Fascist Party

1:25:00  A self-hating Jew is a Jewish Republican.

1:36:00  The most virulent antisemites are Jews.

1:41:00  Sin is just stuff we shouldn't do, for our own good.

1:42:00  Jews do not proselytise because exclusive clubs do not proselytise, but political parties do. Islam could be perhaps be regarded as a one party state with regional branches.

1:42:30  The gap between the observant and non-observant Jews is really the gap between theory and practice. The greater the gap, the greater the sin. The greater the sin, the more you will be punished by God if He exists through rising antisemitism and the Mandate of Heaven being withdrawn from the American empire that Jews are servants to, instead of being the slaves of God they were intended to be. In terms of status, is it better to be the servants of the American empire or the slaves of God? I do have a solution to the problem, but it will gain no traction if I can find no one courageous or educated enough capable of understanding what I am trying to say.

God created evil eg idolatry so Christians can reject it with their reason

Atheists claim their beliefs are based on facts and logic.  1:00  The problem of evil 2:00  Do Christians really understand and believe in t...