Kevin Scott, Chairman of the BDP fears to criticise feminism because Newcastle mothers are mostly SSMs

It is interesting, is it not, that Kevin Scott, Chairman of the British Democratic Party - an ethno-nationaliast party that you might have thought would care about the quality of the next white generation - has absolutely no interest in challenging the evil ideology of feminism.

So bereft of principle and courage is he that he would lower himself to accommodate the views of the Newcastle SSM than tell her plainly that the reason why the country is going to do the dogs is because of the poor reproductive decisions of promiscuous, immoral and irresponsible SSMs whose numbers increased the more feminism established itself in Britain and the West.  https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Never-Married-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379

Stuart Hamilton Kevin Scott is claire khaw officially banned?  8 October at 19:49

Kevin Scott Hello Stuart, and thanks for your concern about the strange journey of Ms Khaw. As you say, no party (whether UKIP, BNP, Tory, Labour - I think she has joined or attempted to join them all!) will entertain her, so why does she think the BDP will be any different? She was given a chance a year or so ago to state her case on a public platform in Newcastle and failed miserably. She is a poor public speaker and had nothing to say other than the anti-immigration movement in this country should embrace immigrants (like her, obviously!) Everybody was very civil and polite to her and she was made to feel very welcome and given a chance to explain her position, both privately and from the platform. She even went native and sank a bottle of Newcastle Brown Ale with the lads!! And that was the end of that!!! I do wish she would find another hobby or past time to occupy her time. Or even follow the advice of the anti-immigration parties she attempts to join and finds the courage to repatriate herself (as a good example to all those immigrants she wants to appeal to via her brand of 'civic nationalism'!) I hope that helped.  8 October at 19:59

Kevin ScottI hate to break the shock news to you, Stuart, but she has nothing useful or even that interesting to say. She is just grandstanding or pursuing some attention-seeking agenda to compensate for the nothingness (it sometimes happens to people from immigrant stock in a strange country) in her life.  8 October at 20:17

Kevin Scott  Criticise feminism (in the north east of England!)? Is she mad?  8 October at 20:49

Kevin Scott  (Unlike Claire,) I have knocked on thousands of doors and listened to thousands of ordinary people and although many of them had very strident views about the state of the country, particularly on politically incorrect subjects such as race and immigration, not once did anyone mention feminism, Leon. Sorry to disappoint you!  8 October at 20:55

If he is afraid of alienating SSMs in Newcastle because the white working classes there are no longer fit for purpose and can no longer compete with foreigners even in the field of unskilled manual labour and half of the people who make up the BDP's potential voters are female, then he should, like me, propose the narrowing of the franchise so that no one on benefits gets the vote under the principle of no representation without taxation.  It seems that Kevin Scott is not much into principles judging from the way he has abused his position as Chairman by keeping me out of the BDP while refusing to state full and proper reasons why I must be prevented from joining.  (I believe it is a combination of (a) not wanting more than one civic nationalist in the BDP; (b) not wanting anyone who might seem a better leader than himself in the BDP; (c) wanting more "racial" Northerners to continue dominating the BDP; (d) fear of having the BDP associated with my antifeminism even as he knows as well as I do that John Tyndall if he were alive now would be campaigning for the repeal of the Equality Act 2010.)

I would have found it almost forgivable if Kevin is atheist and feminist but he is a in fact a Catholic, and should know the dysgenic consequences of not forbidding fornication.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/what-bdp-bnp-and-conservative-party.html

Mao called this sort of thing "tailism".

http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/works/red-book/ch11.htm

"Tailism in any type of work is also wrong, because in falling below the level of political consciousness of the masses and violating the principle of leading the masses forward it reflects the disease of dilatoriness. Our comrades must not assume that the masses have no understanding of what they do not yet understand. It often happens that the masses outstrip us and are eager to advance a step and that nevertheless our comrades fail to act as leaders of the masses and tail behind certain backward elements, reflecting their views and, moreover, mistaking them for those of the broad masses."

I have been compared to Chun Li by a nationalist!

http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=110317&page=3&p=1394641&viewfull=1#post1394641

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chun-Li

Dave Jones sets the record straight with Hope Not Hate

"I find Hope Not Hates claim about me and Claire Khaw 'falling out' ridiculous. They take inferences and present them as facts, loaded with personal jibes against the target with no reference to the facts.


I have been refer ed to as a village idiot, a bore, a pub trawler and now they speculate as to my friendships.


I did not attend the meeting in Newcastle upon Tyne because, working in agriculture, work had to come first. Being degenerate student types who never worked a day in their lives I don't expect Hope Not Hates support base to grasp that concept.


I do not regret allowing Claire Khaw to campaign with me for one second. She and I find ourselves in agreement on the issue of feminism and family. Contrary to what Hope Not Hate say, our friendship and political co-operation is strong and I will be working with her in upcoming local elections and by elections to make certain the anti-feminist message is heard loud and clear."

Nationalist Unity Personified

Hope Not Hate claim me as an employee to discredit me

http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/blog/article/1927/guess-who-came-to-dinner#.T8ZTB_p-70U.twitter

Now if I really were an informant of theirs they would not wish to expose me.

This must mean they wish to discredit me.

Why though?

Because I am becoming too powerful?  But I flatter myself!

The Newcastle Meeting was a lunchtime meeting.  By the time we finished it would be about tea time.   Jeffrey Marshall and I in fact had dinner at the Thai Restaurant in Grainger Town, and very good it was too.

http://www.atbangkokcafe.co.uk/
Thai Restaurant in Newcastle Chinatown

http://www.atbangkokcafe.co.uk/
Thai Restaurant in Newcastle Chinatown

"They were all there too; Holocaust deniers, perverts, race haters and violent thugs."

They were perfectly pleasant to me and to each other.  Even that Kevin Scott who was being so snippy to me on Facebook was civility and friendliness in person.   I think everyone had a good time.  If these were indeed all Holocaust Deniers, perverts, race haters and violent thugs, they were perfectly charming ones.

The photos I had taken next to Andrew Brons was suggested to me and taken by Karen Allen herself.  I will not have anything said against that lovely lady and her husband Edward.

But I know Hate Not Hate prefer fiction to fact.

David Jones could himself could have attended but he did not due to work commitments.  He was at all times aware of my intention to attend the meeting, and we remain staunch political allies.

I would have thought that Hope Not Hate would be pleased with me that I am trying to make the ethno-nationalists see the light of civic nationalism as the only viable way forward, but not a bit of it.   They carp and criticise, tell lies and make things up when the truth could be had by a simple question directed at me.

As for why I was feeling like "an Old Testament prophet", I was referring to the seeming impossibility of interesting British nationalists in the idea of family values, which must necessarily mean challenging feminism.   Kevin Scott was asking me what was my agenda and why I saw nationalism as a platform for my views.  I was  going to answer him but we were interrupted.  I have actually told him before, but he can't seem to get his head round the fact that I am genuinely serious about challenging feminism, which these days can only be done by a woman, because the disease is now so advanced it could be terminal.

"Out of the corruption of women proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil.  The Bhagavad Gita

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/dave-jones-sets-record-straight-with.html
DAVE JONES SETS THE RECORD STRAIGHT WITH HOPE  NOT HATE 

North East Patriots Meeting in Newcastle - 27 May 2012

Me and Andrew Brons

Edward and his wife Karen Allen,  and John McCaffrey

Karen Allen's husband, Karen Allen herself who was PPC for Houghton & Sunderland South in 2010.  It was she who provided the raffle prizes, Ken Booth tells me.  On the right is John McCaffrey, formerly BNP, now an  English Democrat

Jeffrey Marshall listening

Richard Edmonds

Kevin Scott, Andrew Brons, Jim Lewthwaite

Ken Booth, who allowed his BNP membership to lapse, enjoying the show

Peter Rushton about the election results

Andrew Brons giving a very good speech

Andrew Brons describing the Griffin Monster

Andrew Brons eloquent in his description of the Griffin Monster

Andrew Brons telling us of the Griffin Monster

Jeffrey Marshall saying he will reluctantly step into the breach if no one else will do it

I was charmed by Newcastle, its elegance and architecture.

Ken Booth made a few references to my Facebook controversies and looked meaningfully in my direction when he spoke about the unhelpful photos I had of myself taken with a certain Northern Nationalist to whom he did not refer by name.  Attendance was about 50.

Peter Rushton, the first to speak, referred to UKIP as "fake nationalists" during his talk which analysed the election results.

UKIP MAN
As it happened, there was a UKIP man there who told us that he too was "passionate" about his country. "Keep these meetings going, he said, "let's keep patriotism going."  All nationalists should vote for UKIP because it is the biggest Eurosceptic party around, he said.  While they have a long list of nationalist parties whose ex-members are banned from joining their party, people should continue voting UKIP anyway.  UKIP are however adamant that the ban should stay despite his and others' protestations.


ANDREW BRONS

This was the most interesting speech of all.  "There are challenges for us as a nation," he began.  "In the long-term it is a global challenge.  The West is becoming more and more impoverished.  We are in a shambles.  We may not even be able to survive as a nation to deal with the problems."

He referred to Hope Not Hate as "the Hate People".

They did not destroy the BNP, he said.  "We did it on our own."  He likened nationalists to people playing on in ouija board.  Consciously or unconsciously, the message nationalists are being given is that they are heading for DESTRUCTION.

Nick Griffin "craves personal power, uses lies and trickery and is indecisive"  He surrounds himself with Yes Men and people outside the party eg Jim Dowson, Patrick Harrington and allows them to take decisions.

According to Fred Coolidge, deranged dictators from all over the world suffer from the same three things:

1. Narcissism
2. Paranoia
3. Sadism

In fact, Griffin behaves like "a gangster".   David Soane(?) the printer for the BNP in Ireland was told by Nick Griffin and his daughter Jennifer to fabricate receipts against Richard Barnbrook to stitch him up in order to win back the GLA seat.   Nick Griffin even claimed Andrew Brons owed him money which claims Andrew Brons denounced and repudiated.   Now Nick Griffin in trouble as result of that with OLAF [sounded like] which is some EU organisation that investigates fraudulent expenses claims.  [I do hope I have got this right.]  

Nick Griffin is further compared to Gaddafi, Assad and the character played by Sacha Baron Cohen in THE DICTATOR.   Wolfie Smith [whoever he is] was mentioned. 

Apparently, the only reason why Nick Griffin has not sacked Andrew Brons is because Nick Griffin thinks Andrew Brons wants to be sacked.  

Nick Griffin has driven out every person of talent.  The English Democrats and Andrew Moffat were mentioned.   Only deviants, simpletons, and non-party members are retained these days.   

The "disproportion response" taken by Nick Griffin against Eddy Butler, now in the English Democrats, was mentioned.   Andrew Brons admitted that he himself did not think the General Election results were that unsatisfactory [though Eddy clearly did, probably bearing in mind that UKIP failed to get an MP either.

The 840 signatures Eddy Butler was required to obtain before he was eligible to challenge the leadership was an impossibility.  It was even more of an impossibility because he was not even allowed to use the membership list.

"Look at the way Nick Griffin runs the party.  This is the way he will run the country." .  

"Nationalists are like Eeyore - they seem to want to go to a lonely place where we know we won't be followed.  English Democrats went to where the rest of us wouldn't follow."

If he thought it would make a difference, he would join the NF so he could die there, but he didn't think it would make a difference, so he will remain in the BNP.

He did not really think Nick Griffin is a state plant as many do.

He then made a rather puzzling reference to Obama, a bridge in Maine and unemployed construction workers and ended by telling nationalists to think and act rationally.

JIM LETHWAITE asked if BNP is toxic and whether nationalism can start in one region and spread nation-wide.   He remarked on the "collective passivity over Nick Griffin's behaviour" and proposed "a confederation of relatively autonomous branches" in Yorkshire, Lancashire, the North East and the Midlands.

London, obviously, is a lost cause.  In fact, he is not the first Northern Nationalist to say this.

Bloody hell, I thought, these so-called nationalists have more or less implicitly surrendered their capital city without giving any thought of trying to win it back.  I was reminded of China's frequent changing of its capital cities, according to how successful their invaders were.  http://www.chinatraveldiscovery.com/china-facts/historical-capitals-of-china.html

QUENTIN HAWKINS (I think) said nationalism can win through the ballot box.  [I heartily agreed, but only if they implement the changes I recommend.]  It is always the party that says they are the only party who can do this who fail, he said.

There was a break and then I was allowed to speak on the subject of unity.

MY SPEECH
I tried to say that civic nationalism is the only way forward, because even the non-whites (non-white British citizens have been born here for generations now so they too are indigenous, technically) are complaining about immigration.  It is pointless to talk about repatriation either compulsory or voluntary because they are light years from getting into power.  It is unrealistic and pointless to insist on talking about this  as a badge of ethno-nationalism.   [Did I really say this, or did I only mean to?  I later asked Jeffrey and he said I just went on about the usual things I have been going on about for years, and he was a bit vague too.]  I tried to say, but do not know if I in fact said it, that if you cannot get rid of them the least you can do is to make them behave and even vote for you.  I mentioned too how popular BNP policies were  though of course their image needs a make-over to make the most of that instinctive peasant good sense that most people the world over really have, if they have not been brainwashed and indoctrinated.  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-384167/Most-Britons-actually-support-BNP-policies.html

After me,  JEFFREY MARSHALL spoke.  He did not think concentrating on the regions while ignoring the development of the national  party as a whole was particularly constructive.  The BNP brand was at  least recognisable and the little parties just did not register in the consciousness of the voter.

A blond rather handsome middle aged woman, Jan Purvis, who was a hard-line supporter of the 14  Words disagreed vehemently while he was making his speech.   She entirely rejected civic nationalism.   I think she even said that nationalist unity was now in fact impossible.  The best they can do now is stay together, stick to their ethno-nationalist principles, and reject the BNP.  It seemed to me a toxic mixture of complacency and despair.

[At least the BNP calls itself the British NATIONAL Party and embodies those expectations.  What will this woman call her non-party?  The British Regionalist Party?  The British Separatist Party?  Why, if civic nationalism is really so useless,  is UKIP always getting more votes than the BNP?  Why is 17%  of the vote that Marine Le Pen of La Front Nationale obtained something to be dismissed, sneered at and scorned when the British version of it is precisely nowhere because of these dinosaur attitudes that makes them refuse to grasp the ethno-nationalist bull by its horns and wrestle it to the ground?

Taking the bull by the horns - what British Nationalism ought to be 

What British Nationalism is at the moment

http://efp.org.uk/moves-to-nationalist-unity-at-north-east-patriots-meeting/
Hmmm.  It seems plans are afoot ...

http://www.civilliberty.org.uk/newsdetail.php?newsid=1501

Nationalist meeting in Newcastle on Sunday 27 May 2012

http://www.civilliberty.org.uk/newsdetail.php?newsid=1497

I would encourage any nationalist concerned about the future of nationalism to attend this meeting so that questions can be asked of the speakers.

1. Do any of them see feminism as a nationalist issue?
2. Is feminism an issue that nationalists should avoid because it is controversial?
3. Do any all of them see controversy as an opportunity to show the liberals how wrong they are?
4. Is feminism a sacred cow of the British?
5. Should nationalists propose that the sacred cow of feminism be slain?
6. How good has feminism been for nationalists?
7. How good is feminism for the long national interest?
8. Is feminism the enemy of family values?
9. Does feminism condone the right of women to be never married mothers?
10. Does the tolerance of widespread illegitimacy lower educational and moral standards?
11. Does the fact that most babies born in Britain are born out of wedlock augur well for the future of the British?
12. Do any of them see that the tolerance of widespread illegitimacy has led to the degeneracy of the British race?  (By degeneracy I mean your offspring being physically, economically, intellectually, educationally and morally inferior to you.)
13. Do any of them see feminism as the enemy of male and parental authority through which the traditions of any society are passed?
14. Have you noticed that women are far more easily offended than men and how often they call for more taxes to be imposed to suppress free speech and more laws to be passed?
15. Have you noticed how female-dominated and feminist-dominated is the teaching profession?
16. Have you noticed how cleverly the feminist teaching profession disguises its failure to teach your children to be employable?
17. Have you noticed how good women are tricked into careers so they forget to have children?
18. Have you noticed how promiscuous and irresponsible women are not discouraged from having their illegitimate children at the expense of the British taxpayer?
19. Is the degeneracy of the white working classes the reason why successive governments bring in immigrants to do the jobs they should be doing? 
20. Do you think the contempt in which Muslims hold the white man is something to do with the perception that white women are mostly slags as well as the worst mothers in the world,  and that the white man is afraid of his women?
21. Is true that nationalist men do not trust themselves to challenge feminism?
22. If it is true that nationalist men are afraid of their women, should they not let someone else do it?   
23. Do the speakers agree that the person best able to challenge feminism is Claire Khaw?
24. If Claire Khaw is indeed the person best able to speak against feminism on behalf of nationalists and the nation, should nationalists not consider becoming civic nationalists so she can join and represent the party's views on feminism?

If you feel strongly enough about these issues and think that these issues need to be tackled forcefully and intelligently, just print this out and hand it to the speakers at the meeting, after asking one or some of these questions from the floor.  

Otherwise, you know what they will do.  Put you to the expense and trouble of attending the meeting just to to boost their egos while doing NOTHING at all for you, except telling you to wait and see.  

The old dinosaurs of nationalism will not change their tired ideas until and unless they are made to.  Don't let them fob you off any more!