The REAL reason why the BNP refuses to propose any policies that would support marriage

It is offensive to say to point out people's mistakes.  If you find yourself in the position of being an SSM https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379, then it is obvious that you have made the mistake of having offspring before you have found yourself a husband. But do even say this would be disrespectful to slags, and these days being disrespectful towards slags is to be more of a social misdemeanour than to be disrespectful towards marriage.  Marriage these days is of course no more than "a piece of paper" not fit to be used to wipe our bottoms, is it not?

People even get upset at me when I say that the reality of respecting marriage means we must logically forbid extramarital sex.  This is of course heresy, as poor Nadine Dorries discovered to her cost when she suggested that girls should just say no.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/may/05/nadine-dorries-abstinence-bill-girls-sex
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nadine_Dorries#Abstinence_advocacy_for_girls_in_sex_education

Anyway, British women these days are overwhelmingly sluts and fornicatresses.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

Why is this a problem?

David Starkey explains at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14513517

85% of mothers in Jamaica SSMs. http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20070204/focus/focus2.html

Even Britain's foremost Conservative thinker, Peter Hitchens, is afraid of SSMs, saying they "should not be condemned or harassed."  
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/why-is-peter-hitchens-soft-on-ssms.html

The Koran however would lash SSMs 100 times per illegitimate offspring, as I have pointed out to him repeatedly.  However, I do believe he rather despises Muslims for being brown, backward and barbaric while fondly imagining white Christian people to be morally superior because of their liberal, compassionate and effeminate policy of never making the punishment fit the crime.

Are the sins of mothers visited on their sons?  It seems an adulteress can even from beyond the grave exert a a malign influence on her son's journalistic ability to discuss a subject in such urgent need of discussion.  Peter Hitchens is a man already in his 60s.

Such is the power of even women who have gone against the rules and come to a sticky end that they would be condemned as a matter of course in more rational and patriarchal times.  Now of course they are romanticised, sentimentalised and perhaps even glamorised.  It is indeed awful that a man known to be a Conservative thinker and a good speaker cannot now bring himself to discuss the low morals standards of British women because of his own adulterous mother who committed suicide.

Well, if he won't then it appears I must, and I will not shrink from this.
  
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/peter-hitchens-wont-condemn-low-sexual.html

It is clear that British men all suffer from a collective neurosis, rather similar to battered wife's syndrome. This symptom manifests itself in thinking the enemy to be impossibly strong and powerful and therefore not to be resisted.  And this is why these pathetic men who complain about the country going to the dogs dare not condemn feminism which promotes female promiscuity.  They are all like that.  It is a collective male neurosis.  If Britain were under the yoke of a male tyrant their fear of defying would be in a way understandable: they fear hearing a knock on the door in the middle of the night and being taken away to be tortured never to be heard of again.  Now, in matriarchal Britain they actually fear the creatures who are obviously stupider and weaker and poorer than they are.  This kind of degradation is of course much worse than the former, and that is why the more radical Muslims sneer and spit at them as they declare that they will never become like these pathetic men, who only think and act like fearful woman in denial attached to a penis.  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battered_person_syndrome#Symptoms

"The abused has an irrational belief that the abuser is omnipresent and omniscient."

and probably omnipotent too, eh?  My field research has revealed that out of all the people most affected by the lack of respect to marriage are the ones who complain about immigration most vociferously.  The most most illegitimate are the ones who have most desecrated marriage.  

"Men in the North-East were most uncertain if their child is really theirs."

"Mothers in the North West of England were the most uncertain of their child’s  biological father."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2566272/The-1-2million-dads-doubt-child-theirs-One-six-men-North-East-uncertain-babys-paternity.html

This means that there are more slags in the North West than in the North East.  It is bad enough that a woman is pretending to her male partner that her child was sired by him but much much worse if the woman herself does not know who the fuck sired her bastard because she has had so many partners that she really cannot remember.  

One in ten fathers in Britain have doubts over the paternity of their children rising to one in five men in some regions, including the North East

Problem is most apparent in the North West, where six per cent are unsure

three per cent of women say they are not sure of child's father

mothers in the North West, in cities like Liverpool and Manchester, were most likely to be unsure who the biological father of their children was

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2562666/One-ten-fathers-Britain-doubts-paternity-children.html

BNP leader Nick Griffin has been elected to the European Parliament as the party won its first two seats.
Mr Griffin was elected for the North West region while Andrew Brons picked up another BNP seat in Yorkshire and Humber, where it won 10% of the vote.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8088381.stm

Teenage pregnancy

For top-tier authorities, Manchester has the highest teenage pregnancy rate in the region.  For council districts, Burnley has the highest rate, closely followed by Hyndburn, both in Lancashire.   For top-tier authorities, Cheshire has the lowest teenage pregnancy rate.  For council districts, Eden has the lowest rate closely followed by South Lakeland, both in Cumbria.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_West_England#Teenage_pregnancy

Teenage Pregnancy

For top-tier authorities, Kingston upon Hull has the highest teenage pregnancy rate, closely followed by North East Lincolnshire. For top-tier authorities, North Yorkshire has the lowest teenage pregnancy rate. For council districts, Ryedale has the lowest rate, closely followed by Craven. Only North Yorkshire has council districts in the region.

Rotherham had the UK's youngest grandmother - 26 years old. Her 12 year old daughter gave birth on 26 August 1999.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yorkshire_and_the_Humber#Teenage_pregnancy

King Lear  Act 1, Scene 2

EDMUND:

Thou, nature, art my goddess; to thy law
My services are bound. Wherefore should I
Stand in the plague of custom, and permit
The curiosity of nations to deprive me,
For that I am some twelve or fourteen moon-shines
Lag of a brother? Why bastard? wherefore base?
When my dimensions are as well compact,
My mind as generous, and my shape as true,
As honest madam's issue? Why brand they us
With base? with baseness? bastardy? base, base?
Who, in the lusty stealth of nature, take
More composition and fierce quality
Than doth, within a dull, stale, tired bed,
Go to the creating a whole tribe of fops,
Got 'tween asleep and wake? Well, then,
Legitimate Edgar, I must have your land:
Our father's love is to the bastard Edmund
As to the legitimate: fine word,--legitimate!
Well, my legitimate, if this letter speed,
And my invention thrive, Edmund the base
Shall top the legitimate. I grow; I prosper:
Now, gods, stand up for bastards!

http://voices.yahoo.com/deformity-illegitimacy-shakespeares-plays-46697.html?cat=38

It was believed in Shakespeare's time that illegitimate children were destined to follow a similarly evil path. Evidence suggests that Shakespeare shared this popular view. At one point in King Lear, for example, Lear refers to his daughter Goneriil as "a degenerate bastard" (I. iv. 252). Lear also suspects that his wicked offspring are the product of his wife's adultery (Muir 125). According to Elizabethan Thomas Becon, "Bastards were the gifts of God but contrary to the word of God because their generation, conception and bringing forth was unlawful.

God had ordained the state of matrimony for the propagation of the human race, and did not, therefore, bless whoredom but did bless and glorify the fruit of matrimony" (Pearson 266). These "unlawful" children were denied the right to enter a church or to inherit property (Pearson 266). 

So now we know why the BNP cannot win.

Nick Griffin's EU Region is the one most cursed with sluts where the percentage of mothers not sure of who the father of their illegitimate children are is highest.

He does not want to alienate his core supporters, of course, and they are the women who gave birth to their illegitimate offspring and their illegitimate offspring.

I suggest a change of strategy to the BNP Chairman: instead of clinging desperately to these core supporters of dubious chastity who made him MEP, he should consider recruiting Khaw Supporters, ie civic nationalists who are not afraid to publicly support marriage and acknowledge its importance in maintaining the quality of the race and the national gene pool.

I have been saying for ages that to tolerate SSMs is to tolerate widespread illegitimacy, and to tolerate widespread illegitimacy is to tolerate national degeneracy and the creation of an inferior race within your race.

This video demonstrates that black men are more prepared to criticise the morals of their women than white men or even white nationalists and that white men are the most pussywhipped men in the world.

For a married man to be afraid of offending women in a region with the highest percentage of mothers who admit to not knowing who the father of their child is cannot be a desirable attribute for a racial nationalist, surely?   I had always thought ethno-nationalists would be terribly concerned about eugenics and breeding, but it seems I am wrong.  After all, marriage does help protect stupid people from themselves, since, if you did respect marriage, you would not be having sex with your intended until after the wedding, very effectively avoiding the problems of unwanted pregnancy, illegitimacy, single parenthood and breeding with a partner you and your child would be ashamed of.  It seems Nick Griffin is prepared to tolerate the progressive and probably terminal degeneracy of his supporters as long as they can still get it together to shuffle to the polling booth to vote for him as and when required, which seems rather dishonourable to me, if truth be told.

Surely he does not want the white race to mostly consist of the genetic material of the welfare-dependent NEET and the overweight, dim and promiscuous female who cannot control her voracious sexual appetite?

Surely it is time to fire a warning shot at these people instead of cowering abjectedly before them?  If the reason for his fear of offending these people is because they all have the vote, then it is surely time to propose the narrowing of the franchise to taxpayers only. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ianmcowie/100010127/a-tax-based-alternative-to-the-alternative-vote/

It is really too bad if British Nationalism remains confined to the chinless wonders like Gregory Lauder Frost and his gang of misfit upper class males http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23627520 on the one hand and the likes of The Fat Slags and Baz on the other. Gregory Lauder Frost apparently hates feminism so much he is not prepared to even discuss it at TBG meetings, but would propose the repatriation of Lady Lawrence and in the next breath tell me I am considered a "loose cannon" by his old boys' club the Traditional Britain Group.

This is why these goons and clowns are mocked by everyone.  To be leader of a party voted MEP by people with the lowest standards of sexual morality in the country must surely be already fatal, even without the added racism.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ns9oMXdSiQM

The Fat Slags by Viz

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1390959/Cheryl-Cole-SACKED-X-Factor-USA-Geordie-accent.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/why-white-race-is-declining-in-numbers.html

Why can't Nick Griffin see the utter degradation of nationalist men being seen by other races to be afraid of sluts and SSMs?  Can he now understand why Muslims don't want to integrate into British culture because they don't want their daughters to become like the Fat Slags or their sons to become Baz their sidekick?  Is this really so hard to understand?

As for the alleged Jewish conspiracy to make nationalists look bad in the "Jew-controlled media", they surely don't need to even try, do they?

Jews, Muslims and Asians at least try to practice their religion and respect marriage while the white indigenous call it a piece of paper not fit to wipe their bottoms with. That is why Jews and Muslims are now treated with more respect than the white indigenous proletariat, but this subject is not to be discussed, because the men fear to upset the easily upset sluts and SSMs who will then withhold sex from them.

I think we already know that the Anglican and Catholic Church has been fatally infested by liberals, feminists and homosexuals and will never recover its moral authority within our lifetimes because we have a relatively young Pope intent on getting into the sexually liberal swing of things.

What is to be done?  Watch this space for I  have the solution to their problem.  Can you guess what it is?  

Andrew Brons tweet: BDP should be towed away by Claire Khaw as it is now no good to man nor beast

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/claire-khaw-offers-to-tow-away-broken.html

Gay nationalist Peter Phillips did *not* part ways with BDP because they had a problem with him being out and proud

http://www.searchlightmagazine.com/blogs/searchlight-blog/engine-trouble-stalls-andrew-brons%E2%80%99s-new-party

It was because he disagreed with the way the party was being run, and it is being run by committee.

http://www.tomschori.com/35800.HTM explains this concept.

It is also another way of saying run by buck-passing.

When I was excluded from the London IONA Forum it was a decision by Committee.  Ditto Traditional Britain Group.  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/why-do-traditional-britain-group.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck_passing

Below are a few more suggestions of what it all means.

"It means they're pretending to make decisions as a group. But in reality the decisions have already been made by their handlers. It's all a sham."

"It's a way to avoid ever having a responsible party to blame."

They have a committee structure and insist on everything being "bottom up" up rather than "top down", whatever that means.  Party members think Andrew Brons is President, but he isn't and they have no real leader.  Kevin Scott is only the Chairman of the Steering Committee.  It is clear that they lack party identity and different regions do whatever they like.

It is possible that Peter Phillips

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrB_ITm-0k4

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2006/jun/16/uk.thefarright

wanted a shot at the leadership, but everyone else was in favour of the Committee System.  You can see from his analysis of the national debt that he is leadership material, but it seems that is not good enough for the easily-frightened founder members of the BDP who really didn't want a leader at all.   The fact that he is gay would add great interest, but they decided not to take any chances.  He must have seen that the BDP was a hopeless case and because of this wouldn't give them the True Brits name which he had copyrighted.

It seems the Committee System is an extreme response to Nick Griffin's leadership style of Führerprinzip http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F%C3%BChrerprinzip

Instead of electing a leader with suitable checks and balances, they basically opted to have no leader at all.

How interesting that these men do not or will not accept that without a leader they will never get anywhere. Instead, they prefer to faff around in the fields of failure until their dying day, while allowing nationalism to be associated with racism, antisemitism and Islamophobia peopled by the lumpenproletariat too stupid to even elect a leader because they are afraid of being kicked around by someone who is going to exploit and abuse them without getting them anywhere.

What this also says is that they are too distrustful even of each other to choose a proper leader.

What a shame that British nationalism is now reduced to this kind of pathetic and womanish risk-aversion.

Doubtless these men are not in the least bit afraid of being told that they are incompetent and effeminate cowards and prefer the occupational therapy of pretending to be in a party that is really a social club for old timers who cannot accept that times have moved on.

This is a classic case of putting the cart before the horse.  http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/put+the+cart+before+the+horse

Draft letter for Andrew Brons welcoming Claire Khaw into the British Democratic Party

Dear Ms Khaw

Please accept my sincere apologies for not getting back to you until now.  Your questions at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/a-question-for-andrew-brons-of-british.html#_=_ were rather difficult to answer honestly without having to abandon ethno-nationalism altogether.

I will answer them in the order that they were asked.

Q1.   "Whether ethno-nationalists like it or not, Civic Nationalism is the only way towards electoral respectability.  When racial nationalists say they will be voting UKIP at the 2015 General Election, they are in fact conceding that Civic Nationalists have won the argument."  Would Andrew Brons care to comment on this?

A1.   It would appear that civic nationalism has won the argument, as you say.

Q2.  If civic nationalists have indeed won the argument, it is not time for ethno-nationalists to acknowledge this, and plan for the future on this basis?

A3.   Yes, it would appear wise to do so.

Q4.   If civic nationalists have indeed won the argument and voters use UKIP as the biggest stick with which to beat the Tories with at the 2015 General Election, how likely do you think the voter is to return to ethnno-nationalism at the General Election after that?

A4.   Not at all likely.

Q5.   If you think it is unlikely that the voter would return to the ethno-nationalist parties after voting UKIP at the next General Election, do you think it is now time for the BDP and BNP to go civic nationalist sooner rather than later so that you are in a position to compete with UKIP at the next General Election?

A5.   I do believe you could be right.

Q6.   If you are thinking of going civic nationalist sooner rather than later, do you think have a non-white such as Claire Khaw in your party in a prominent position would show that you are doing more than paying lip service to civic nationalism and utterly transform your image from being racist evil extremist antisemites and Islamophobes to something more morally and intellectually respectable?

A6.   Absolutely.  You would be a breath of fresh air and certainly useful to the BDP in transforming its image.

Q7.   If you think civic nationalism is boring, do you think Claire Khaw would be the best person in Britain to make civic nationalism attractive, inclusive and exciting?

A7.   Try as I might I can think of no one else who wants the job more or can do the job better than you.

Q8.   Are you aware that the Claire Khaw has been described as a "British Nationalist Philosopher" by Hugh Muir of The Guardian?  http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/jan/02/hugh-muir-diary-bnp-conservatives
Who else in nationalism has been described as such?

A8.   No one but you.

Q9.   Are you afraid of letting Claire Khaw into your party because you fear she will take over?

A9.   I think you can understand why some of our members might be a little nervous at that prospect.

Q10.  What are you afraid she might do if Claire Khaw does indeed take over?

A10.   Of doing better than anyone of us has done so far.

Q11.  Why don't you let Claire Khaw do the job that you ethno-nationalists clearly cannot?

A11.   To be honest, I cannot now think of any cogent or moral reasons not to do so apart from the unbearable howls of pain and squeals and squawks of Kevin Scott and his ilk.

Q12.   Would you say that your true position is that you would rather your race became hopelessly degenerate or even extinct rather than admit that ethno-nationalism is a dead duck?

A12.   This used to be our unstated position, but you have now persuaded us that civic nationalism is the way forward, and for that we are grateful to you.

Q13.  Would you say that your true position is that you would rather your race became hopelessly degenerate if not actually extinct than accept any advice or assistance from Claire Khaw even as you know that ethno-nationalism has been a miserable failure for so many decades now?

A13.   Certainly not!

Q14.  Are you aware that Pride is a Deadly Sin?

A14.   I certainly am.

Q15.  Is it your intention never to have this debate so that you can take your ethno-nationalist beliefs with you to your graves?

A15.  I am delighted to inform you that we have now had this debate and accepted the unassailable logic of your arguments that ethno-nationalism is a lost cause.

Welcome, to the BDP, Ms Khaw.  We look forward to seeing what you can do for us as BDP Media Spokesman.  It is very much hoped that you will accept this appointment.

Yours sincerely

Andrew Brons

Questions for Andrew Brons of the British Democratic Party

http://britishdemocraticparty.org/contact/

My message to Andrew Brons of today:

"Whether ethno-nationalists like it or not, Civic Nationalism is the only way towards electoral respectability.  When racial nationalists say they will be voting UKIP at the 2015 General Election, they are in fact conceding that Civic Nationalists have won the argument."  

Would Andrew Brons care to comment on this?

I have a few more questions:

1. If civic nationalists have indeed won the argument, it is not time for ethno-nationalists to acknowledge this, and plan for the future on this basis?
2. If civic nationalists have indeed won the argument and voters use UKIP as the biggest stick with which to beat the Tories with at the 2015 General Election, how likely do you think the voter is to return to ethnno-nationalism at the General Election after that?
3. If you think it is unlikely that the voter would return to the ethno-nationalist parties after voting UKIP at the next General Election, do you think it is now time for the BDP and BNP to go civic nationalist sooner rather than later so that you are in a position to compete with UKIP at the next General Election?  
4. If you are thinking of going civic nationalist sooner rather than later, do you think have a non-white such as Claire Khaw in your party in a prominent position would show that you are doing more than paying lip service to civic nationalism and utterly transform your image from being racist evil extremist antisemites and Islamophobes to something more morally and intellectually respectable?
5. If you think civic nationalism is boring, do you think Claire Khaw would be the best person in Britain to make civic nationalism attractive, inclusive and exciting?  
6. Are you aware that the Claire Khaw has been described as a "British Nationalist Philosopher" by Hugh Muir of The Guardian?  http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/jan/02/hugh-muir-diary-bnp-conservatives 
7. Who else in nationalism has been described as such?  
8. Are you afraid of letting Claire Khaw into your party because you fear she will take over?  
9. What are you afraid she might do if Claire Khaw does indeed take over?
10. Why don't you let Claire Khaw do the job that you ethno-nationalists clearly cannot?
11. Would you say that your true position is that you would rather your race became hopelessly degenerate or even extinct rather than admit that ethno-nationalism is a dead duck?  
12. Would you say that your true position is that you would rather your race became hopelessly degenerate if not actually extinct than accept any advice or assistance from Claire Khaw even as you know that ethno-nationalism has been a miserable failure for so many decades now?  
13. Are you aware that Pride is a Deadly Sin?  
14. Is it your intention never to have this debate so that you can take your ethno-nationalist beliefs with you to your graves?  

I wonder if I will receive a response.

1. Will he pretend not to have received it?
2. Will the message be passed on to him by whoever deals with his correspondence?  
3. Or will it be deleted?
4. Or ignored?
5. If Andrew Brons does receive this and does not deign to respond, what might his reasons be?  
6. Would it be because he does not know how to answer the question?
7. Would it be because he fears to give a truthful answer?
8. If he does not reply at all is it because of incompetence or intellectual dishonesty or just plain out and out racism ie he does not think I deserve a reply because of my race?   

We shall see!

Any nationalist who wants this question to be answered is requested to get in touch with Andrew Brons so that he knows that you know that the question is hanging in the air.

http://www.civilliberty.org.uk/newsdetail.php?newsid=1682  (This is written by Kevin Scott, I believe.)

http://britishdemocraticparty.org/home-truths-from-abroad/ (Adrian Davies is the only one who earnestly advocates civic nationalism, but I can see the lot of them dragging their feet and blocking their ears, because, guess what, they don't want to do it.  For them to go civic, they would have to let me in, and that just wouldn't do it, would it?)

I am female and a foreigner, not white and male, so my views can safely be ignored. All they have to do is exclude me from their meetings and disable me from commenting on their little visited website.

Even if I am absolutely right about everything I say, they do not have to acknowledge this, they think to yourselves, and there is nothing I can do about it.

This is what these dishonorable men think and do.   But why would they wish to deny the truth?

Because these despicable men who fear to discuss this issue properly have become women. There is no other explanation, is there?

Why I despise "nationalists" who hate Maggie and the Queen

http://nationalistunityforum.co.uk/index.php/mrs-margaret-thatcher-nee-roberts-by-andrew-brons/
Andrew Brons calls Maggie "an unmitigated scoundrel".

http://www.bnp.org.uk/ does not mention Maggie at all.  Maggie died on Monday and today is Thursday.

Nick Griffin tweets barely coherently about her.

Mrs Thatcher a disaster for working class & Britain's coal & manufacturing industries. Held her nerve like a true leader in the Falkland ...
— Nick Griffin MEP (@nickgriffinmep) April 8, 2013

... War though. Conned intoflawed giant
— Nick Griffin MEP (@nickgriffinmep) April 8, 2013

Conned into thinking the EU was about money rather than ruthless federalism, she still towered over the rest.
— Nick Griffin MEP (@nickgriffinmep) April 8, 2013

No point Tories complaining about the far-left celebrating death of Thatcher. Camoron is STILL an official sponsor of the UAF street gang.
— Nick Griffin MEP (@nickgriffinmep) April 9, 2013

Republicans are mostly northern and proletarian males as well as lefties without much much imagination eaten up by envy and rancour for anyone with a better accent and more money than they have.

They are mostly men though I suspect there are more northern men than southern men who want to abolish the monarchy and whinge about the cost of Maggie's funeral.

The reason why northern Englishmen hate the monarchy more than southern Englishmen is because they are poorer.

The poor of Britain are eaten up by class hatred and envy.  But should I even call them poor?  They have money enough for their beer and cigarettes, their football and their junk food, their TV and their iPhones.  I thought of calling them working class, but many of them have not worked for generations, and should be called the Claimant Class.  Perhaps it is just easier to call them lower class, for some of them do work, but are low-waged.  Let us call a spade a spade.

It is of course natural for the depraved, uneducated and infantile to hate people who have more than you, and it is how often I come across this in Britain that brings home the fact that Envy is a Deadly Sin, not that you would expect the average Briton, especially if he is working class, to even suppose for a moment that there is anything wrong at all in practising the principle of hating anyone else who has more than you.

That is probably the only principle they will ever understand anyway.

It is women who were thought to be prone to envy, but these days in feminist Britain, most men think and behave like the worst of their women.

These people have no sense of national pride, if all they can do is whinge about Maggie ruining their lives. They are not nationalists in the sense of wanting good things for their country.  As for national pride, this would go with having a sense of occasion and the desire to say words and do things that befit the occasion.

Certainly, when they hate the Queen for not saving them from the EU - yes, even the educated ones feel no shame in expecting a frail elderly lady to save them from the monster that is the EU and the treachery of their own leaders! - they show their utter failure to understand the concept of a constitutional monarchy, which was after all a British idea.

They are angry with her in the same way a spoilt child is angry with nanny for not giving them the sweets and treats they clamoured for and thought they deserved, just for being themselves.

Nationalism, for them, means getting rid of immigrants while being stupid enough to expect that things would stay the same after they have kicked all the non-whites out.

What would happen?  We would be back to the three day week, wildcat strikes and beer and sandwiches in Downing Street.   Other nations would ask ask the British abroad "What has happened to your country?  Why can't you do something about your working classes, and make them work, which is what they are for?"

But nationalists come from the lower strata of society and never discuss politics with foreigners, and don't like going abroad very much.

One would have thought that displaying a sense of national consciousness is to be aware of how other nations perceive you and to have some idea of what they like or dislike about you as a people and a nation.  The rest of the world loves the Queen and loves Maggie even as they despise certain types of lower class British holidaymaker, one longs to inform them.   Being in possession of national pride also means that you would instinctively feel a desire not to disgrace yourself in front of foreigners and feel a desire to put on a good show especially if the entire world is watching you.

However, these "nationalists" have no sense of occasion as they carp and complain about the cost of Maggie's funeral and whinge about the poor and the sick and the dying, who will always be with us.

When you point out to them that it was Jesus who said this, they affect to not know or really do not know what you mean.

So much for being a Christian country then!

They seem unaware that the White South African or Zimbabwean here can barely conceal their contempt for them and regard them as no better than the lazy and rancorous blacks they came here to escape from.

If these nationalists (or should I just call them "white welfare dependent people who cannot compete with foreigners even in the field of unskilled manual labour"?) did feel national pride they would be pleased and flattered that other nations admire Maggie and feel affection for the Queen, but all they do is think of what they might have done with the £8M that is being spent on her funeral.

Spent it all on drink, drugs, sex toys, scratchcards and bingo, probably.

Their agenda is always negative, petty, bilious and ignoble, and none of their leaders have the courage to tell them the few home truths that they so desperately need to hear, for fear of being hated in the same way that Maggie is hated.

That is why they will continue to fail, because the overwhelming number of them are incorrigibly proletarian in a nation of snobs who are not interested in repeating the failure of Wat Tyler's peasant revolt.

They are not even aware that any revolution requires the input of a significant number of professional middle class people, as any reading of the French and Russian Revolutions as well as Hitler's rise to power, would attest.

Nick Griffin is more interested in staying top dog in the BNP and running it as a family firm than in recruiting talent, however, and that is why BNP supporters and activists will continue to be exploited and betrayed.

This country is full of immigrants because the working classes are not fit for purpose, and no leader of any political party dares to tell them this, because they all have the vote.    

The reason why the working classes are not fit for purpose is because of the low morals of their women as well as the poor quality of mothering and education (which is female-dominated), and no leader of any political party dares to tell them so, because they all have the vote.

The greatest failure of Maggie was in not having policies radical enough to make the working classes fit for purpose again.  But no one is perfect, not even Maggie, and we should at least give her the credit of having made the right noises, which was more than what the others dared to do.

@1party4all I would only expect such a generalised sneer at working-class Nationalists from a Trot. Misjudged you badly, Claire. Bye now.
— Michael Graham (@Ironwand) April 11, 2013

While I did not expect nationalists to like what I said about them, I did not expect to be called a Trot for promoting marriage.

I am not saying anything new anyway, since it is already all in Deuteronomy, and it should be noted that the British satisfy all the conditions of being Cursed by God.   http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/why-white-race-is-declining-in-numbers.html

Clearly, Man created God in order to protect him from the promiscuous woman.  Future generations, especially those who do not observe the Sabbath or follow the Koran, always seem to forget the reason for this.

Marx:

“History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce.”

Explaining to people why marriage is an institution is a little like explaining to an uneducated dimwit how it was discovered that the earth goes round the sun rather than the other way round.   Even if you have got it exactly right, you will find that your questioner's eyes have closed and his mouth fallen open in sleep by the time you finish your explanation.

And that is why Man created God, who prohibited the extramarital sex that causes the degeneracy of your nation and the decline and fall of your civilisation that will inevitably follow if you do not control the promiscuity of your women.

Otherwise, you will find yourself being obliged to explain to sexually liberated dimwits how and why respect for the institution of marriage is the pivot upon which gender balance rests, and suffer their rage and abuse when they realise that the answer to the question they asked is actually beyond their comprehension.  

Why nationalists hate Thatcher

http://nationalistunityforum.co.uk/index.php/mrs-margaret-thatcher-nee-roberts-by-andrew-brons/ has Andrew Brons, formerly of the BNP, calling Maggie "an unmitigated scoundrel".

If there was something Maggie failed to do, it was to make the working classes of Britain fit for purpose again.

She tried, though, by wagging her finger at them from time to time and telling them to stop being moaning minnies and to get on their bikes. At least she knew to make the right noises.  She even talked of people feeling "swamped" by immigration.

Whingeing about Thatcher means you must have lost under Thatcher.

But not all the white working classes lost under Thatcher.

Essex man and Mondeo man and those who got it together to buy their own council homes, because they had the nous to seize opportunities, did rather well for themselves.

So it looks like nationalists are losers and Brons is hoping to persuade people vote for him by identifying with a bunch of losers.

It does not sound like a winning strategy to me.

British Democratic Party launch reviewed

http://nationalistunityforum.co.uk/index.php/recording-of-the-first-part-of-the-saturday-9th-february-2013-meeting/

Kevin Scott, said that the new party would respect the rights of those legal immigrants and their descendants to remain in the UK without fear or hindrance. 

You would have thought they have learnt not to say things like that any more.   The lady doth protest too much!  This is from http://nationalistunityforum.co.uk/index.php/british-democratic-party-launches-in-leicester/

The most important and interesting speech is Adrian Davies' who speaks approvingly of the success of Marine Le Pen and Front Nationale.  Her father Jean Marie has been nagging British nationalists to unequivocally embrace civic nationalists since 2004, advice that Nick Griffin would do well to follow.   The singular lack of urgency that characterises British nationalism is something about which British nationalists ought to be thoroughly ashamed.

Sadly, however, a singular lack of shame is yet another badge of British nationalism.

http://nationalistunityforum.co.uk/index.php/bdp-launch-part-2-audio/

The most interesting speech  from the above link is Andrew Brons', who confuses nationality with race.   He wants citizenship only to be given on grounds of nationality, and nationality as far as he is concerned is about race.

If only British nationalists would drag themselves out of the primeval swamp of ethno-nationalism and take a dip in the pool of inclusive nationhood as defined by the Islamic concept of a racially neutral ummah.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ummah

Someone suggested that members be made to sign up to the party's principles and  it had to be pointed out by Adrian Davies that BDP cannot exclude anyone on grounds of race, because that is now the law, unless they fancy spending a hundred thousand pounds or thereabouts disputing this in court.

The BDP is clearly more "racial" and more full of unreconstructed ethno-nationalists  than the BNP who have modernised to the extent that it now describes itself in its constitution at 3.2.1 in these terms:

"Our party is a party of British nationalism, both ethnic and civic".   

It is terribly disheartening that they still do not understand why civic nationalism is the only way forward.  To succeed, they must be ideologically more civic than the BNP, but they went the other way instead.   I suppose that is the reason why Kevin Scott the Chairman excluded me from attending without deigning to give a reason.

I just feel a bit sorry for these people who are now going to have their time and money wasted, because they do not see the point of having ideological clarity.  Most of them are grateful to have something to do after being kicked out of the BNP, I suppose.  They are taking the middle way between the NF and the BNP when what is required is for a party that takes the middle way between the BNP and UKIP.

Yes, they are dunces and dunderheads, mules and fatheads, and there is nothing I can do about it.

To be associated with a movement that is always shooting itself in the foot and putting its bloodied limb in its mouth is something I must continue to put up with, I suppose.  

Doubtless, if I were white and male they would be begging me to lead them.  However, because I am female and foreign, they will ignore everything I say, just because they wish to do the opposite of what I say.

Never mind, when things get bad enough, they will remember that I told them so, and come to me begging  me to be their leader.

As ever, I intend to be magnanimous in victory, and graciously accept.   To err is human, to forgive divine.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/327008697419786/
Who should lead the nationalist movement if not Nick Griffin?

Should nationalists join the Judean People's Front or the People's Front of Judea?

http://nationalistunityforum.co.uk/index.php/time-for-a-party/#comment-35061

http://thednparty.org/

Nationalists should join the LibLabCon

http://draemerson.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/patria-party-of-nationalist-patriots.html

"Do not give in to evil but proceed ever more boldly against it" says Dr Emerson, but he is so out of touch he said it in Latin, thus entirely misjudging the educational attainments of his natural audience.

http://efp.org.uk/building-a-new-party/


I urge all nationalists who want to continue participating in politics to join the Conservative Party. There will be leadership elections and interesting stuff happening soon. You can only fight the LibLabCon by joining them in sufficient numbers to affect the outcome of any leadership elections.

It will not be so demoralising to be a member of a governing party. The BNP is dead in the water and its putative rivals are clearly going to be even smaller and more useless.

What do you do once you have joined the Conservative Party?  Attend, listen, observe, learn and continue reading this blog.

Michael Gove - who was state-educated and very clever - is the one to watch.

At least join to see to it that Boris Johnson - another toff who has demonstrated no political talent or appetite to discuss the serious issues of the day apart from displays of his Etonian charm - doesn't get to be the next PM by default.

Brons is too old and is known for a lifetime of being to little too late, and I really cannot see Kevin Scott of Gateshead getting it on with southerners or displaying any leadership qualities superior to Griffin's.

Basically, the British Democratic Party is a party of Northern Nationalists. If you can't bear to join the Tories but cannot join UKIP (because they will not have you if you have joined any political party they disapprove of listed at http://www.ukip.org/helpukip) you might as well stay in the BNP and be the vassal and villein of your feudal lord Griffin instead of wasting your time.

https://www.conservatives.com/Get_involved/Join/Member.aspx

Andrew Brons leaves the BNP. What next for British nationalism?

https://apps.facebook.com/theguardian/politics/2012/oct/16/bnp-andrew-brons-resigns-mep


No nationalist party will get anywhere without new blood and a reviving injection of civic nationalist maturity. It remains to be seen how adventurous and innovative Brons will be.

His main problem was always too little, too late.

I doubt if he and his associates did form a party they would have me in it.

That is why I don't think they will get anywhere.

Ethno-nationalism is a dead duck ideology and the only high profile member of the NF is Richard Edmonds.

Although I like and respect Richard, he is not the man capable of making nationalism attractive to those not born into the faith, shall we say.

The BFP are now seen as losers rejected by the EDL. They are already tainted by their Islamophobia. They will not have the will or the sense to recant from that either.

It would just be easier if nationalists hailed me as their leader and formed a party round me.

I would be quite happy to use as much of the old BNP constitution as I practically can, including having annual leadership elections when the membership reaches a certain stated minimum to be agreed between myself and the other founder members.

The problem, as ever, is finding a good leader, and this is not a problem confined only to nationalism.

Looking around, I am probably as good as you are ever going to get. If you don't agree then find someone better capable of connecting with the voting public. You won't be able to.

If you disagree, then just name a single nationalist you can think of who can get as much publicity as I can.

I have been around for years, and I am not a flash in the pan. I do not really think my conviction and courage can be doubted.

All that I believe in I have already stated publicly, repeatedly and loudly. There will be no nasty surprises.

All the evidence against me is already online.

Choosing me as your leader would immediately wash away the taint of racism from nationalism.

If you have not seen the writing on the wall, then you cannot read and obviously refuse to learn. There are none so blind as those who will see, and Pride (especially chauvinistic racial pride) is a Deadly Sin.

North East Patriots Meeting in Newcastle - 27 May 2012

Me and Andrew Brons

Edward and his wife Karen Allen,  and John McCaffrey

Karen Allen's husband, Karen Allen herself who was PPC for Houghton & Sunderland South in 2010.  It was she who provided the raffle prizes, Ken Booth tells me.  On the right is John McCaffrey, formerly BNP, now an  English Democrat

Jeffrey Marshall listening

Richard Edmonds

Kevin Scott, Andrew Brons, Jim Lewthwaite

Ken Booth, who allowed his BNP membership to lapse, enjoying the show

Peter Rushton about the election results

Andrew Brons giving a very good speech

Andrew Brons describing the Griffin Monster

Andrew Brons eloquent in his description of the Griffin Monster

Andrew Brons telling us of the Griffin Monster

Jeffrey Marshall saying he will reluctantly step into the breach if no one else will do it

I was charmed by Newcastle, its elegance and architecture.

Ken Booth made a few references to my Facebook controversies and looked meaningfully in my direction when he spoke about the unhelpful photos I had of myself taken with a certain Northern Nationalist to whom he did not refer by name.  Attendance was about 50.

Peter Rushton, the first to speak, referred to UKIP as "fake nationalists" during his talk which analysed the election results.

UKIP MAN
As it happened, there was a UKIP man there who told us that he too was "passionate" about his country. "Keep these meetings going, he said, "let's keep patriotism going."  All nationalists should vote for UKIP because it is the biggest Eurosceptic party around, he said.  While they have a long list of nationalist parties whose ex-members are banned from joining their party, people should continue voting UKIP anyway.  UKIP are however adamant that the ban should stay despite his and others' protestations.


ANDREW BRONS

This was the most interesting speech of all.  "There are challenges for us as a nation," he began.  "In the long-term it is a global challenge.  The West is becoming more and more impoverished.  We are in a shambles.  We may not even be able to survive as a nation to deal with the problems."

He referred to Hope Not Hate as "the Hate People".

They did not destroy the BNP, he said.  "We did it on our own."  He likened nationalists to people playing on in ouija board.  Consciously or unconsciously, the message nationalists are being given is that they are heading for DESTRUCTION.

Nick Griffin "craves personal power, uses lies and trickery and is indecisive"  He surrounds himself with Yes Men and people outside the party eg Jim Dowson, Patrick Harrington and allows them to take decisions.

According to Fred Coolidge, deranged dictators from all over the world suffer from the same three things:

1. Narcissism
2. Paranoia
3. Sadism

In fact, Griffin behaves like "a gangster".   David Soane(?) the printer for the BNP in Ireland was told by Nick Griffin and his daughter Jennifer to fabricate receipts against Richard Barnbrook to stitch him up in order to win back the GLA seat.   Nick Griffin even claimed Andrew Brons owed him money which claims Andrew Brons denounced and repudiated.   Now Nick Griffin in trouble as result of that with OLAF [sounded like] which is some EU organisation that investigates fraudulent expenses claims.  [I do hope I have got this right.]  

Nick Griffin is further compared to Gaddafi, Assad and the character played by Sacha Baron Cohen in THE DICTATOR.   Wolfie Smith [whoever he is] was mentioned. 

Apparently, the only reason why Nick Griffin has not sacked Andrew Brons is because Nick Griffin thinks Andrew Brons wants to be sacked.  

Nick Griffin has driven out every person of talent.  The English Democrats and Andrew Moffat were mentioned.   Only deviants, simpletons, and non-party members are retained these days.   

The "disproportion response" taken by Nick Griffin against Eddy Butler, now in the English Democrats, was mentioned.   Andrew Brons admitted that he himself did not think the General Election results were that unsatisfactory [though Eddy clearly did, probably bearing in mind that UKIP failed to get an MP either.

The 840 signatures Eddy Butler was required to obtain before he was eligible to challenge the leadership was an impossibility.  It was even more of an impossibility because he was not even allowed to use the membership list.

"Look at the way Nick Griffin runs the party.  This is the way he will run the country." .  

"Nationalists are like Eeyore - they seem to want to go to a lonely place where we know we won't be followed.  English Democrats went to where the rest of us wouldn't follow."

If he thought it would make a difference, he would join the NF so he could die there, but he didn't think it would make a difference, so he will remain in the BNP.

He did not really think Nick Griffin is a state plant as many do.

He then made a rather puzzling reference to Obama, a bridge in Maine and unemployed construction workers and ended by telling nationalists to think and act rationally.

JIM LETHWAITE asked if BNP is toxic and whether nationalism can start in one region and spread nation-wide.   He remarked on the "collective passivity over Nick Griffin's behaviour" and proposed "a confederation of relatively autonomous branches" in Yorkshire, Lancashire, the North East and the Midlands.

London, obviously, is a lost cause.  In fact, he is not the first Northern Nationalist to say this.

Bloody hell, I thought, these so-called nationalists have more or less implicitly surrendered their capital city without giving any thought of trying to win it back.  I was reminded of China's frequent changing of its capital cities, according to how successful their invaders were.  http://www.chinatraveldiscovery.com/china-facts/historical-capitals-of-china.html

QUENTIN HAWKINS (I think) said nationalism can win through the ballot box.  [I heartily agreed, but only if they implement the changes I recommend.]  It is always the party that says they are the only party who can do this who fail, he said.

There was a break and then I was allowed to speak on the subject of unity.

MY SPEECH
I tried to say that civic nationalism is the only way forward, because even the non-whites (non-white British citizens have been born here for generations now so they too are indigenous, technically) are complaining about immigration.  It is pointless to talk about repatriation either compulsory or voluntary because they are light years from getting into power.  It is unrealistic and pointless to insist on talking about this  as a badge of ethno-nationalism.   [Did I really say this, or did I only mean to?  I later asked Jeffrey and he said I just went on about the usual things I have been going on about for years, and he was a bit vague too.]  I tried to say, but do not know if I in fact said it, that if you cannot get rid of them the least you can do is to make them behave and even vote for you.  I mentioned too how popular BNP policies were  though of course their image needs a make-over to make the most of that instinctive peasant good sense that most people the world over really have, if they have not been brainwashed and indoctrinated.  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-384167/Most-Britons-actually-support-BNP-policies.html

After me,  JEFFREY MARSHALL spoke.  He did not think concentrating on the regions while ignoring the development of the national  party as a whole was particularly constructive.  The BNP brand was at  least recognisable and the little parties just did not register in the consciousness of the voter.

A blond rather handsome middle aged woman, Jan Purvis, who was a hard-line supporter of the 14  Words disagreed vehemently while he was making his speech.   She entirely rejected civic nationalism.   I think she even said that nationalist unity was now in fact impossible.  The best they can do now is stay together, stick to their ethno-nationalist principles, and reject the BNP.  It seemed to me a toxic mixture of complacency and despair.

[At least the BNP calls itself the British NATIONAL Party and embodies those expectations.  What will this woman call her non-party?  The British Regionalist Party?  The British Separatist Party?  Why, if civic nationalism is really so useless,  is UKIP always getting more votes than the BNP?  Why is 17%  of the vote that Marine Le Pen of La Front Nationale obtained something to be dismissed, sneered at and scorned when the British version of it is precisely nowhere because of these dinosaur attitudes that makes them refuse to grasp the ethno-nationalist bull by its horns and wrestle it to the ground?

Taking the bull by the horns - what British Nationalism ought to be 

What British Nationalism is at the moment

http://efp.org.uk/moves-to-nationalist-unity-at-north-east-patriots-meeting/
Hmmm.  It seems plans are afoot ...

http://www.civilliberty.org.uk/newsdetail.php?newsid=1501

Nationalist meeting in Newcastle on Sunday 27 May 2012

http://www.civilliberty.org.uk/newsdetail.php?newsid=1497

I would encourage any nationalist concerned about the future of nationalism to attend this meeting so that questions can be asked of the speakers.

1. Do any of them see feminism as a nationalist issue?
2. Is feminism an issue that nationalists should avoid because it is controversial?
3. Do any all of them see controversy as an opportunity to show the liberals how wrong they are?
4. Is feminism a sacred cow of the British?
5. Should nationalists propose that the sacred cow of feminism be slain?
6. How good has feminism been for nationalists?
7. How good is feminism for the long national interest?
8. Is feminism the enemy of family values?
9. Does feminism condone the right of women to be never married mothers?
10. Does the tolerance of widespread illegitimacy lower educational and moral standards?
11. Does the fact that most babies born in Britain are born out of wedlock augur well for the future of the British?
12. Do any of them see that the tolerance of widespread illegitimacy has led to the degeneracy of the British race?  (By degeneracy I mean your offspring being physically, economically, intellectually, educationally and morally inferior to you.)
13. Do any of them see feminism as the enemy of male and parental authority through which the traditions of any society are passed?
14. Have you noticed that women are far more easily offended than men and how often they call for more taxes to be imposed to suppress free speech and more laws to be passed?
15. Have you noticed how female-dominated and feminist-dominated is the teaching profession?
16. Have you noticed how cleverly the feminist teaching profession disguises its failure to teach your children to be employable?
17. Have you noticed how good women are tricked into careers so they forget to have children?
18. Have you noticed how promiscuous and irresponsible women are not discouraged from having their illegitimate children at the expense of the British taxpayer?
19. Is the degeneracy of the white working classes the reason why successive governments bring in immigrants to do the jobs they should be doing? 
20. Do you think the contempt in which Muslims hold the white man is something to do with the perception that white women are mostly slags as well as the worst mothers in the world,  and that the white man is afraid of his women?
21. Is true that nationalist men do not trust themselves to challenge feminism?
22. If it is true that nationalist men are afraid of their women, should they not let someone else do it?   
23. Do the speakers agree that the person best able to challenge feminism is Claire Khaw?
24. If Claire Khaw is indeed the person best able to speak against feminism on behalf of nationalists and the nation, should nationalists not consider becoming civic nationalists so she can join and represent the party's views on feminism?

If you feel strongly enough about these issues and think that these issues need to be tackled forcefully and intelligently, just print this out and hand it to the speakers at the meeting, after asking one or some of these questions from the floor.  

Otherwise, you know what they will do.  Put you to the expense and trouble of attending the meeting just to to boost their egos while doing NOTHING at all for you, except telling you to wait and see.  

The old dinosaurs of nationalism will not change their tired ideas until and unless they are made to.  Don't let them fob you off any more!

Nationalist Unity Meeting 17 May 2012

I enquired what was decided at the meeting.  My sources inform me that they discussed whether or not to form another party and get the 65 year old retirement aged Andrew Brons to be the figurehead.

I have no idea why nationalists would think that yet another nationalist micro-party with a leader older and slower than Nick Griffin, defeated in a leadership election, could ever be more successful than the current BNP, especially one that has decided to dissociate itself from me because it is pretending that I endorse the actions of Breivik when I have taken every care to say that Breivik is a terrorist and that it is possible for nationalists to gain influence even under the current rules, but only if they are strategically astute.

Perhaps it is yet another disease of the mind that Western men are currently afflicted by.

The last time I attended such a meeting, I told them that they needed to find a leader who is obviously better than Nick Griffin, but I fear that they either did not understand the implication of my words or cannot quite grasp that Andrew Brons is obviously not better than Nick Griffin, since he was defeated in a leadership contest.

If I had been allowed to attend, and not shunned because Richard Edmonds has chosen to pretend that I endorse the actions of Breivik (whom I had described as a terrorist on numerous occasions), I would have said the same thing, and doubtless they would have listened just as uncomprehendingly and carried on just as before.

I wonder if this proposed party that would have Andrew Brons as figurehead would have an ideology that is ethno-nationalist, or civic nationalist.   Perhaps it did not even occur to them to address this issue at their meeting.   Since it was mostly ex-BNP members who have now gone over to the NF, they will be going back to muttering darkly about forcible repatriation again, probably, seemingly oblivious to the fact that any attempt to do so would bring about civil war, and that  British citizens who have been born here have nowhere to be "repatriated" to.

It is terribly terribly sad that they do not seem to have realised that time has moved on or heard of the old Texan saying "If all you do is all you ever did, then all you'll get is all you ever got" - defeat and disappointment.

Most of my ex-BNP buddies have gone to the English Democrats (who are too bland and boring) or the NF (who are too full of stick in the mud dinosaurs who have not noticed that the non-white British citizens they would like to repatriate have been born here for three generations now).

Ironically and laughably, they like to pretend that they are more intellectually and socially respectable than me and claim falsely that I endorse Breivik's actions (even though they cannot find anything I have said in words and deed to prove this), when it is they who fear and hate Muslims more than me.

In fact, I do not fear Muslims at all.  In fact, I think there is much of their religion that the British used to follow before the Muslims arrived.   In fact, I propose that Islam - and a distinctly Anglicised form of it, with Anglican forms of worship in Churches with carols and hymns, pews and pulpits (but with Trinitarian elements excised) should be made the national state religion after the current lot of third-rate minds incapable of discussing morality beyond tolerating every damn single evil thing, openly gay priests, women, socialists, liberals and feminist clergymen have been defenestrated and dramatically disestablished.

Predictably, I have not been given the opportunity of putting it to put it to them that civic nationalism will give ethno-nationalists more of what they want than ethno-nationalism.  Perhaps they already know this, but don't care, as long as they can keep themselves busy going round ever-decreasing circles.

Even I would be give nationalists a sense of a new dawn than Andrew Brons ever would.  Many at the last meeting I attended complained of the tardiness and ineffectiveness of his actions, always too little, always too late.

I really do not think they want success, but prefer the failure that fuels their grievance, because that is all they ever knew and all they will ever know.   Put to them a new idea and they will behave in exactly the way a vampire would  if you offered them a phial of holy water or a wreathe of garlic.   You cannot help the Undead, especially if they do not want to be helped.

Perhaps the only future for the independent nationalist who refuses to give up is to infiltrate the established parties.   The Conservative Party would be the obvious choice, now that they have a seething simmering backbenchers' rebellion after having ousted Peter Bone, the most rebellious of the rebel Tory MPs.

Sadly, for most of my ex-BNP buddies, they will be too tribal and socially awkward to contemplate leaving the group of people they have met at their little social club that they fondly imagine is a political party.  

An offer the BNP should not refuse, if it knows what's good for it, which it probably doesn't

An exchange between an anonymous nationalist well-wisher and me

He:

Did you ever think about contacting Brons about getting back in the BNP? Griffin's finished and it's only a matter of time before Brons makes his move. And, being a total political realist, he'll accentuate the civic Nationalism angle.

Me:
Brons has never responded directly to any of my communications.  I have been told he is a hard-line racialist, so no surprises there.   

I do not think however badly Griffin does that Brons will take over.  He is pretty much discredited anyway in London for being so slow to act and so ineffective in action.

He:
Brons is the epitome of caution gone mad. And he is known for not answering anything inconvenient sent to him. The only other possible approach would perhaps be to Simon Darby. In the BNP London Mayoral campaign post-mortem, it must have occurred to him - and others - that they should have stuck with you rather than standing Carlos the Jackal. Maybe, couch a first enquiry in terms of asking his advice.

Me:
Perhaps it would be better if you put it to Simon Darby?  Otherwise it is just me ceaselessly blowing my own trumpet!

He:
Darby is a pragmatist - and if rumour is ever true - he's MI5 as well. But only the first point matters.

Say you've been thinking over the BNP London Mayoral campaign and the part you could have played in making it more successful - getting a Richard Barnbrook 5.3% or more, rather than a Carlos level of 2.1%. The London result shows that people don't vote for policies, they vote for personalities, and Carlos had no personal impact, did he? You would have had everyone in the capital aware of the BNP.

Add that the Mumsnet thing was largely - or entirely, if you wish - due to your a clash of cultural perceptions rather than malice, and say that you undertake to keep clear of any such controversy ever again. Lesson learnt, OK? Then ask his advice as to how to rejoin the party. I've seen on your blog the letter from Walker - it makes no mention of permanent expulsion, and there's no reason why this should be implied.

You are an impetuous and headstrong person, and passion is always admirable. But here, go for contrite - not humble pie - and convey the impression to Darby that you're seeking the advice of a reasonable man. I'm sure he's read your blog and knows you're an outstanding activist and he will see a real advantage in having you back - so long as if you get back in, you line up with him - he maybe gets the credit for some of the things you do - and you don't rock his boat. My sources tell me that Darby has always felt inferior to Griffin and was always looking for allies.

A woman of your talent is wasted on the political fringes so, go for it via Facebook and see what happens. You are an enormous loss to the BNP and all you have to do is get Darby to see it.

Me:
I really don't think that even if Simon wanted me in the party he would get it past Nick Griffin.

He:

Just ask Simon for his advice. Or, maybe go for broke and write to Griffin direct, asking him to rescind your expulsion and state that you would accept a period - possibly a prolonged period - of restricted membership if he deemed it appropriate. It could work. The trick is - getting your foot in the door.

I think the best thing for me to do is simply to let everyone know what ideas are afoot as regards my political future.  All suggestions gratefully received.   

My goals are:

1. redefining nationalism and transforming it into something more than knee-jerk xenophobia and racism that is really about socialism and welfare for whites only
2. to challenge and defeat feminism as a respectable ideology
3. to make a point about promoting nationalist unity (by this I mean the co-operation and collaboration of civic and ethno-nationalists and that David Jones of Todmorden and I together are exemplars of this practice)

I therefore propose that

1. David Jones and I be admitted into the BNP jointly.
2. the requirement for a two-year probationary period to be waived.  (This is to protect us from being summarily expelled without being able to defend ourselves before a disciplinary tribunal, which has happened to many nationalists.  I have in any case been involving myself in nationalist politics for well over five years.)
3. the requirement that we have to be members for five years before we are eligible to take part in a leadership contest be waived.  (This is to give an opportunity for a display of good faith on the part of Nick Griffin who has previously shown such bad faith towards other nationalists, and leaving them in a worse position financially and in career terms than if they had never involved themselves in nationalism.  Now is the time to reverse the image of nationalism as being only for losers, CHAVs and social retards.)

While I am aware that Nick Griffin and those who take his orders are unlikely to accede to our requirements because it is not in the advantage of Nick Griffin to do so, it should be pointed out that those who care for the future of nationalism and the condition of the white working classes that this is a very good bargain indeed.

(Yes, I a foreigner and a female with to be be identified as a representative of the white working classes because their liberal political establishment has utterly abandoned them and those who claim to represent their interests only grow fat on their grievances while doing nothing to ameliorate their condition.) 

Were David and I to be welcomed into the party - we would instantly transform the PERCEPTION of nationalism as an ideology merely for the lower classes who cannot compete against foreigners who are ignorant, xenophobic and racist into something pragmatic, morally and intellectual grounded and attractive to right-thinking British citizens of ALL races.

I shall certainly not dissociate myself from my family values message and my campaign against Never- Married Mothers and Feminism.  Taking on this fight against widespread illegitimacy and female promiscuity is the first step towards the British nation's moral and social regeneration.  A morally and socially regenerated Britain will have  fewer laws after the restoration of male and parental authority in a much much smaller state.  The kind of British Nationalism that David and I intend to promote would be business-friendly too, for we are both libertarians, believing that prosperity can be achieved only through industry.  In this dog eat dog world, only the fittest will survive and feminism and liberalism is the opposite of eugenic.  Western civilisation has been alarmingly weakened by decades of degeneracy and decline wrought by the pernicious ideology of feminism that encourages women to be promiscuous, irresponsible and parasitical.  It can only achieve a renaissance through its formal and ceremonial defenestration.