Rabbi Singer should have denounced Christianity for the blasphemy Christians themselves admit

4:00  Rabbi Singer only goes as far as to liken idolatry to spiritual adultery.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanhedrin_trial_of_Jesus

Mark 14:55–59 states that the chief priests had sought witness against Jesus to put him to death but did not find any, so they arranged false witnesses against him, but their witnesses did not agree together. Mark 14:61 states that the high priest then asked Jesus: "Art thou the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?" And Jesus said "I am", at which point the high priest tore his own robe in anger and accused Jesus of blasphemy. In Matthew 26:63, the high priest asks: "Tell us whether you are the Christ, the Son of God." Jesus responds "You have said it", prompting the High Priest to tear his own robe,[2][9][10] breaking Mosaic Law (Leviticus 21:10).

How many of the Ten Commandments have Christians broken? (They forbid idolatry and blasphemy.)

How many of the Seven Noahide laws have Christians broken? (They forbid idolatry and blasphemy.)

Even Christians cannot deny that the New Testament was written by mortal and fallible men. Christians do not claim that the New Testament was written by Christ, let alone God while Jews believe that the Torah was God's Word for Jews and Muslims believe that the Koran is God's Word for gentiles.

Could Christianity be a practical joke played on the credulous and intellectually dishonest?

After 2000 years of blasphemy and idolatry, when will the penny drop?

Did God send Jews and Muslims to the West to make Christians uncomfortable enough to examine the burned and bloody history of Christianity?

Surely the only people who have the right to call themselves Christians are those who have been confirmed?

Churches define the strength of Christianity with "bums on pews" rather than numbers of confirmed Christians because they are now so few that the Catholic Church no longer even releases these figures. 

Only around 6 million confirmed Anglicans in the UK

Christianity only managed to sustain itself through state intimidation because its doctrines are so absurd that only fear of execution and state persecution would stop people from questioning the Trinity. Once government lost the political will to do so, that was the beginning of the end of Christianity.

The fatal blow to Christianity was from the Americans when they separated the church from their state. Most of the Founding Fathers denied the Trinity, paving the way to Islam. After all, a righteous gentile who wishes to worship the Abrahamic God without being guilty of idolatry and blasphemy is closer to being Muslim than Christian. The Founding Fathers were really proto-Muslim.
https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/724/church-of-the-holy-trinity-v-united-states

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Adams#Religious_views
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin#Virtue,_religion,_and_personal_beliefs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Hamilton#Religion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Jay#Religion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Thomas_Jefferson
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_George_Washington
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Enlightenment

The other fatal blow to Christianity was the Doctrine of the Trinity Act 1813 administered during the reign of Queen Victoria.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctrine_of_the_Trinity_Act_1813

Is it the duty of observant Jews and dawah-extending Muslims to warn the non-Muslim gentile Westerner that Christianity is kaput?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawah
https://conservativewoman.co.uk/bending-the-knee-to-marxist-oppression/

The writers for The Conservative Woman, being Christians and Islamophobes, refuse to discuss whether Christianity is kaput. In view of all that has been happening, it really is not that hard that to put two and two together and conclude that the West is now as Christian as a human skeleton used to be human. Isn't it actually dangerous to proceed without one?

Do Jews and Muslims have a duty to warn Christians that their religion has failed? Do they have a duty to warn the mainly atheist and nihilistic Post-Christian Westerner that his society will collapse without a religion at least effective at maintaining minimum standards of sexual morality? Britain is now a society of sluts and bastards with more unmarried parents than there are married parents.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html  A serial sirer of bastards is now Prime Minister of Britain and his bastard lives there with him. That the British are now indifferent to bastardy is a sign that it has become normalised. In this nation of sluts and bastards, even the Archbishop of Canterbury is a bastard.
https://justthetalk.com/uknews/37387/the_archbishop_of_canterbury_is_a_bastard,%20absolute:true)/47

If Jews and Muslims either collectively or individually refuse to warn the non-Muslim Western gentile that Christianity is kaput, is cowardice, indifference or hatred their reason?

If the societies of their host nation collapse won't they also suffer?

Isn't the quickest way of warning the non-Muslim gentile Westerner to point out that Christianity was doomed to failure because of its idolatry and blasphemy?

What could be more idolatrous than to worship an executed revolutionary who claimed his papa was Allah Himself as His co-equal?

What could be more blasphemous to Jews than for gentiles to worship a man they had condemned to death for blasphemy as the co-equal of Hashem?

If you see someone about to consume noxious and toxic food and drink, do you not have a duty to warn them of its noxiousness and toxicity?

Or are Jews and Muslims just sitting back and enjoying the show after getting their kosher and halal popcorn ready to watch the world burn?

If that is what they are doing, do they not also deserve punishment?

Is it a sign of God's forbearance that He has not already destroyed the West?

Revenge is a dish best served cold. If God could be said to revenge Himself on His creatures, the sin is in itself the punishment. The punishment for practising an illegitimate, idolatrous, blasphemous and absurd religion is that the even more vacuous religion of BLM will move into the moral vacuum of Christianity.

Rabbi Tovia Singer: Jesus will not save you

Rabbi Singer's speaking style leaves much to be desired, but what he says should be of great interest to Christians: Christianity is idolatry. Muslims would agree with him. If Judaism is monotheism for Jews and Islam monotheism for gentiles, what is Christianity then? We know they couldn't even agree with each other on the Doctrine of the Trinity at the Council of Nicaea, called by a Roman Emperor who was not even Christian. We know the New Testament was not by Christ, let alone God. We know that the Koran lets Jews off as Christ-killers because it says Christ was not in fact crucified, it only appeared that he had been. Unfortunately, the Christian narrative is that Christ became the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God and Christian practice has been to worship Christ as the co-equal of God knowing full well that the Abrahamic God had specifically and explicitly forbidden idolatry and blasphemy. It is undeniably supreme blasphemy to worship someone convicted of blasphemy as the co-equal of God, is it not? If Christianity no longer works in the West and the religion of the West is about to become BLM, perhaps this is a way of God punishing blasphemers and idolaters for neither worshipping Him correctly nor obeying His laws for 2000 years.




0:30  How can you defy the world of the prophets and hope to be saved? 4:39  Deuteronomy

2:00  Isaiah 46:9 is not proclaimed in churches.

Deuteronomy 4:15

3:00  There is nothing resembling the Trinity in the Tanakh.

6:00  The idolatry of Christianity

7:00  Rabbi Singer confirms that he is indeed comparing Jesus to crack.

The ritual cannibalism of Christianity

 8:00  Rabbi Singer's message to Christians who were told as children by grandma that "Jesus loves you"

What is to be done?

If you are an atheist always complaining about Jews and Muslims who appear to have taken over your country, should it not be patently obvious what the people you complain about have that you yourself lack?

If the idea of worshipping an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God fills you with revulsion and the idea that your ancestors were forcibly converted into this religion fills you with rage, does this not mean that the religion of your ancestors was an illegitimate religion cooked up by con men who are now largely known for their sexual scandals as Creatures of the Liberal State? If there are only two Abrahamic faiths for gentiles and the one you are identified with has already failed, what should you do?

Perhaps you should wonder if the Abrahamic God if He exists is capable of a sustaining a rather cruel practical joke for 2000 years and wondering when you will notice that a trick has been played on you. If you were paying attention or cared about the principle of the thing, you would have noticed by now.

The principle of the thing is:

If it walks like a duck and sounds like a duck and quacks like a duck, is it a duck?

Isn't worshipping a man idolatrous?

Isn't worshipping this man as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God ipso facto idolatrous and blasphemous?

If Trinitarian doctrine sounds idolatrous and blasphemous, is it in fact blasphemous and idolatrous?

What do Jews and Muslims say about Christianity? What does the fact that Jews are forbidden to enter churches but allowed to enter mosques tell you about their attitude to what would be for them the capital offence of idolatry if the Torah were still followed? What was Christ crucified for? He was crucified for the blasphemy of saying that his papa was the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God who created the Universe and now exists outside it as pure spirit.

Atheists and nihilists who know what religion is for but do not wish to make the sacrifices their ancestors did - that of marrying and having legitimate children - will be avoiding the question. They avoid the question because the answer - that of replacing a broken moral system forbidden by God with one effective at maintaining minimum standards of sexual morality - is obvious.

The harm of idolatry and blasphemy atheists find almost impossible to understand

It should be noted that Daniel is an ex-Catholic and is now atheist. Atheists believe both monotheists and polytheists are mad and silly and do not distinguish between

a) the idolatry of non-Abrahamic deities and
b) the worship of the Abrahamic God.

However, any knowledge of Judaism would tell you that the Torah ordains death for any Jew convicted of idolatry. If Jews practised idolatry as the Normans did, they would, like the Normans, be now extinct having assimilated themselves out of existence. Christians are now virtually extinct in the West since very few who identify as Christians are confirmed and very few confirmed Christians actually believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God. In fact, the West is as Christian as a human skeleton used to be human.

In short, to affirm the divinity of Christ is ipso facto idolatrous and to affirm his co-equal status with the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God is ipso facto blasphemous.

Christ was crucified for blasphemy - a capital crime for Jews. Christians have themselves affirmed the blasphemy for which Christ was crucified and to this day affirm the idolatrous Doctrine of the Trinity, apparently blissfully ignorant of God's prohibition of idolatry and blasphemy in His Ten Commandments. If this is pointed out to them, they are indifferent to the gravity of this sin, and are clearly more pridefully invested in their idolatry than in the correct worship of God.

They are also indifferent to warnings that idolatry leads to self-worship and self-worship leads to self-destructive narcissism. Should they end up destroying themselves like Narcissus, they can always blame the Jews who neglected their religious duty to promote the Noahide laws - which also forbid idolatry and blasphemy - amongst gentiles.

And so the endless cycle of blame will continue, until and unless the correction of Secular Koranism is adopted and imposed. I like to think it is not too late to repent, even after 2000 years of idolatry and blasphemy.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/05/secular-koranism.html
https://www.learnreligions.com/what-is-teshuvah-2076801

Step 1, Regret. Realize the extent of the damage and inwardly adopt of feeling sincere regret.
Step 2, Ceasing.  Immediately stop the harmful action.
Step 3, Confession and restitution. Verbalize the mistake and ask for forgiveness, either from God or from the wronged party. If possible, the wrong must be righted through compensation. If the sin is against God, acts of charity may be considered as restitution. 
Step 4, Resolution. Make a firm commitment not to repeat the sin in the future.

1:00  Apparently, "Jewish behaviour" is "feigning ignorance of what constitutes Jewish behaviour".
2:00  I am accused of being the Barbara Lerner Spectre of Islam and "avoiding the JQ".
3:00  Gandalf gets hysterical about the Noahide laws.
4:00  Universal laws and Natural Law
5:00  Rejecting the Noahide laws because they are Jewish
6:00  Spokesperson for the Rabbinate
7:00  Idolatry
8:00  Jews are godless. Does he mean they are liberal?
9:00  Wotan
10:00  Obsessed with Jews
11:00  Idolatry
12:00  Christ was an executed revolutionary!
13:00  "Jesus is divine by nature."

1:00  Just as most gentiles are liberals, so are assimilated Jews liberal. Should gentiles apologise to Jews for corrupting their morals with liberalism?

I am "an enigma with sinister aristocratic handlers", apparently

I prefer the Unitarian view of God rather than the Trinitarian view because the latter is idolatrous and blasphemous. I hope https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2020/05/the-harm-of-idolatry-and-blasphemy.html finally makes clear my position.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tawhid

7:00  The concept of God definitely exists. If we see the point of obeying His laws, we will incline towards belief because belief in God who made laws for us would make us more likely to obey them from generation to generation thereby prolonging the existence of our civilisation.

The unprincipled Post-Christian Western Man cannot defeat the matriarchy without the help of Jews and Muslims

The strongest principles we have are religious principles.

Western Man is politically inert because he is Post-Christian. The Post Christian no longer believes in having principles, preferring to be bribed or threatened in the way beasts of burden are motivated by carrot or stick.

Western Man, formerly Christian Man, is unprincipled because the most important principle of Christianity is a patent absurdity, for a Christian is defined as one who worships an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God.

It has been said that Christianity and Hypocrisy march hand in hand. What could be more hypocritical than claiming to believe in the Abrahamic God while practising the idolatry of worshipping an executed revolutionary as His co-equal?

What could be more blasphemous than to claim to worship God who has forbidden idolatry than to be guilty of the Supreme Blasphemy and Ultimate Idolatry of claiming that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of Hashem/Allah?

Once it became legal to deny the Trinity in 1813, the lifeblood of the lies that made up Christianity drained away. 200 years later, Christian faith is now so drained away that it was discovered that the Archbishop of Canterbury himself forgot that he was supposed to believe in that absurdity. He was heard to be declaring that while he sometimes doubted the existence of God, he was sure Christ definitely existed.

When Christians took their faith seriously, they would burn other Christians at the stake for heresy, which was defined as denying the Trinity. Michael Servetus was burned at the stake for this in 1553, but most Christians are not aware of the bloody and totalitarian history of Christianity.

His execution was at the behest of John Calvin who promoted usury which has now ended in negative interest rates to punish savers.

When you point out the idolatry of Christianity to Christians, they would look at you with blank incomprehension or claim they don't care that they are idolatrous, unmindful of the fact that the Abrahamic God that they claim to believe in expressly and specifically forbade idolatry from the time of Moses. Later, God also sent a warner against idolatry in the form of Muhammad, but because no violence was done to them, they thought they had escaped the consequences of their lies. But have they? God if He exists would be infinitely patient and has all of eternity to wait for the lying idolatrous hypocritical blaspheming Christian to suffer the consequences of the sin of idolatry, which is its own punishment.

The chief harm of idolatry is that it leads ineluctably to self-worship and the self-destruction of Narcissus.

The idolater would be so focused on his idolatry that he will ignore Truth, Logic and Morality itself while claiming to support it, so hypocritical is he.








Western Man is politically inert because he has no principles
https://ask.fm/oneparty4all/threads/160697472897

The Principle of the Thing
https://ask.fm/oneparty4all/threads/160694478209

Mohammed Hijab investigates Trinitarianism

The absurdity of the Trinity is that Christians are required to believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the Abrahamic God in order to be Christian. This is clearly idolatry.  http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=4&verse=116

Mohammed should be grateful that Christians no longer take their religion seriously. Those who think themselves Christian are not Christian, but are too theologically ignorant to know this, like the Archbishop of Canterbury.

https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/09/what-is-point-of-having-archbishop-of.html

Otherwise, to "win" the argument, Christians might burn you at the stake or conduct the Inquisition or invoke the Blasphemy Act 1697.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_Act_1697

Michael Servetus was burned at the stake for denying the Trinity.  https://www.christianity.com/church/church-history/timeline/1501-1600/michael-servetus-burned-for-heresy-11629984.html

Islamophobes might have some of their fears allayed knowing that quran.com/2/56 guarantees freedom of belief and is believed by some to be the basis of the First Amendment. 

The First Amendment was derived from the Koran

Receiving corporal punishment in Bandar Aceh, the real purpose and origin of the blasphemy laws in Pakistan and belief in God

Mother of UKIP leader Nigel Farage mocks Christ and the magi with two other naked elderly women

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2816357/U-strip-thought-Nigel-Farage-colourful-Meet-mum-naked-calendar-girl-age-74.html

UKIP leader's mother (centre) appeared as one of the three wise men for a calendar, with a gold gift covering her chest

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_Magi

Christ and the magi are mocked by three naked elderly women one of whom is the mother of the leader of UKIP.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy#Punishment

@SuzanneEvans1 @2tweetaboutit Such a shame that @Nigel_Farage who wants to be a serious politician has to contend with his exhibitionist mum
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2014

@SlimMarm @SuzanneEvans1 @Nigel_Farage British male politician allows himself to be undermined by his elderly exhibitionist mother.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2014

@SuzanneEvans1 @2tweetaboutit @Nigel_Farage Why do male politicians allow themselves to be undermined by exhibitionist female relations?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2014

@DaveWarren7 @SuzanneEvans1 @2tweetaboutit @Nigel_Farage Women must have their way however stupid and low their morals, eh? Sickening.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2014

@DaveWarren7 @SuzanneEvans1 @2tweetaboutit @Nigel_Farage I am sure ISIS will be delighted to know how easily UK politicians are undermined.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2014

@DaveWarren7 @SuzanneEvans1 @Nigel_Farage All men really are lower than all women in Britain, especially women of dubious sexual propriety.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2014

@DaveWarren7 @SuzanneEvans1 I feel sorry for @Nigel_Farage having to put up with this sort of shit from his exhibitionist mother.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2014

@DaveWarren7 @SuzanneEvans1 @2tweetaboutit @Nigel_Farage Yeah, I know freedom to make a tit out of yourself is a cherished British right.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2014

@DaveWarren7 @SuzanneEvans1 I am sure @Nigel_Farage won't have the balls to tell off his exhibitionist mother, more's the pity.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2014

@DaveWarren7 @SuzanneEvans1 @2tweetaboutit We all know @Nigel_Farage has to grin and bear his exhibitionist mother making a tit out of UKIP.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2014

@DaveWarren7 @SuzanneEvans1 @2tweetaboutit @Nigel_Farage If I do crap like that when my offspring is 50 I hope someone shoots me.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2014

@DaveWarren7 @SuzanneEvans1 @Nigel_Farage The shamelessness and lack of propriety of British women makes British men a laughing stock.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2014

@DaveWarren7 @SuzanneEvans1 @2tweetaboutit The way @Nigel_Farage has to grin and bear it while his mum makes a tit out of him is telling.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2014

@topsnowboarder y should I be jealous of an elderly woman with no sense of propriety suffering from exhibitionism whose son is a politician?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2014

@topsnowboarder Making a tit out of your politician son is just a bit of fun for over-entitled exhibitionist British women, clearly.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2014

Victor Shannock, a Catholic, appears to say that those who deny the Trinity are the antichrist

http://biblelight.net/antichrist_and_jesus.htm

This means Christians regard Jews and Muslims collectively as the antichrist.

Is it not time to defenestrate this intolerant, irrational and totalitarian religion from Western civilisation?

As I have already said, the last service the Pope of Catholicism can do for mankind is to renounce usury, apologise for the hypocrisy of Christianity and convert to Islam in order to become the Pope of Islam.

The doctrine of the Trinity is clearly evil since it was this belief that started the Inquisition.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inquisition

Those denying the Trinity were deprived of the benefit of the Act of Toleration, 1689. The Blasphemy Act 1697 enacted that if any person, educated in or having made profession of the Christian religion, should by writing, preaching, teaching or advised speaking, deny that the members of the Holy Trinity were God, or should assert that there is more than one god, or deny the Christian religion to be true, or the Holy Scriptures to be of divine authority, he should, upon the first offence, be rendered incapable of holding any office or place of trust, and for the second incapable of bringing any action, of being guardian or executor, or of taking a legacy or deed of gift, and should suffer three years imprisonment without bail.

An Act of 1812-1813 excepted from these enactments persons denying as therein mentioned respecting the Holy Trinity.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_law_in_the_United_Kingdom

That was the kind of thing Christians used to do when they took their religion seriously.

Now that they no longer taken their religion seriously, you have Catholics priests and MPs promoting gay marriage together with Rowan Williams the Commie Pinko former-Archbishop of Canterbury.

Only a Christian chauvinist who has read the Koran would continue to insist that the Bible is a better rule book than the Koran.

@1party4all there is no free grace - no salvation offered in Islam, from the standpoint of the Cross Muhammed was a false prophet
— victorshannock (@victorshannock) February 18, 2013

@1party4all you may find this interesting re the New Testament teaching on those who deny the incarnation - biblelight.net/antichrist_and… …
— victorshannock (@victorshannock) February 18, 2013

If none of the papabili can bring themselves to renounce usury, then we will know once and for all  the rotten state of the Catholic Church.

Victor Shannock claims that I have been misrepresenting his views at:

I have had to block @1partyforall who has been grossly misrepresenting my views on the incarnation and the antichrist, & been spamming
— victorshannock (@victorshannock) February 19, 2013

How so?

He has blocked me so he does not have to explain.   I have not misrepresented his views at all, and taken care to quote him verbatim.  His own words are enough to condemn him.  Remember, it was not Jews or Muslims who started the Inquisition nor was it they who conducted the Crusades.

Very interestingly, he has deleted his tweets.

How Muslims can blaspheme against the religion and deity of the atheist liberal

Yvonne Ridley:

Taji Mustafa was on BBC Radio 4 Today show talking about the chaos caused across the world because of the vile film insulting the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) made in the USA. The thrust of his argument was Holocaust Denial in Germany is a crime, calling for the death of British soldiers on Facebook is a crime in Britain - people have been prosecuted for this. He said every country has a red line and if it is crossed there will be a reaction - in the Muslim world there are red lines too and it is insulting Islam. He also said the non Muslim world should understand that Muslims have a different set of values. Can we continue the discussion please.

MY RESPONSES I HAVE CUT AND PASTED

They are saying that Muslims should regard the practice of their religion and the mocking of their prophet with the same casual indifference that Christians regard theirs.

If I insult anyone and everyone, I should not be surprised if people wish me and do me harm as a result.

To get their own back, Muslims should blaspheme against feminism and denounce SSMs.

There is a page specially dedicated to them at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Stigmatise-SSMs-Slut-Single-Mothers/220271251432495

Insult Islamophobes by blaspheming against their sacred cows.

What are their sacred cows?

Slut Single Mothers

Muslims worship God while Islamophobes worship the SSM and are afraid of them. Even the British Prime Minister is afraid of them.

SSMs are the cause of widespread illegitimacy which means they are the cause of racial and national degeneracy. BASTARD remains a term of abuse.

Men who say it is OK to be an SSM are saying it is OK to have their country run for the benefit of the most immoral and stupid of their women at the expense of what is left that is still good about this country.

Why do Western men put up with this? Because they have been fucked by feminism. Both anally and vaginally.

Their brains have turned to shit, their guts to piss and their balls to mince.

All because they want their cheap sex with their cheap sluts who give them bastard children who are no good for the British labour force.

That is why successive governments keep importing foreign labour to replace them.

SSMs are ultimately responsible for immigration because their badly brought up bastard children are not fit to be a member of the British labour force.

If you want to continue living in Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland, then you know what to do: do nothing and say nothing and watch your country go down the toilet.

SSM - Slut Single Mum ie mothers of illegitimate offspring
She is clearly culpable for intentionally getting pregnant, recklessly getting pregnant, or negligently getting pregnant.

MOBFOB - Mother of Bastard still living with Father of Bastard

FOBMOB - Father of Bastard still living with Mother of Bastard

DSM - Divorced Single Mum
She may not be entirely to blame for her divorce if she was married to a brute who beat her and abused her children. However, at the very least she is guilty of marrying in haste and must repent at leisure.

WSM - Widowed Single Mum
You *must* be married before you can become a widow. If you got knocked up by some loser and he died leaving you and your bastard unprovided for, you are an SSM

SPOSSM - Sex Partner of SSM
They are commonly supposed to be potential or suspected paedophiles.

You will notice that not a single UK political party supports marriage or the family or social conservatism.

Next time you bump into anyone from the EDL, you know what to say: SSM, SSM, SSM.

Get them where it hurts - in the balls.

"SSM - a hundred lashes for your SSMs ... "

You have to talk to them in language sluts and bastards understand.

"SSM - a hundred lashes for your SSMs ... "

"SSM - a hundred lashes for your SSMs ... "

It wouldn't work in a noisy street, but if Muslims were to wait for those who go to church to go to church they could gather outside churches and say and chant that every Sunday as the congregation arrive ....

"SSM - a hundred lashes for your SSMs ... "
about an hour ago · Like

"No marriage, no culture, no family.
No morals, no money, no future."

You are supposed to fight for Allah with your life and your property, and these people are well, a bit Anti-Allah, as far as I can see.

Is there a Muslim version of the Anti-Christ? Is there such a thing as Anti-Allahism?

Instead of saying "Behead those who insult Islam" they could be saying "Lash a hundred times your slutty mums!"

That would be far better.

Nick Cohen asks: Should Britain submit to a de facto blasphemy law?

https://apps.facebook.com/theguardian/commentisfree/2012/sep/16/nick-cohen-islam-film-censorship

He says NO, conveniently forgetting that we already have the Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_and_Religious_Hatred_Act_2006 as well as section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986.

What Emma West said was blasphemy if you are a godless liberal.  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kf0q9n6r-EY

To a liberal, hate-speech is blasphemy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech

How typical dishonourable and disingenuous to say that gratuitously insulting people and ideas non-liberals find sacred is OK, but not the other way round.

Holocaust Denial, anyone?

Stronger, Shorter, Clearer v Weaker, Longer, Vaguer

Totalitarian blasphemy laws are perhaps a European tradition. If one denied the divinity of Christ, what else would one not go on to deny? Once we do not insist upon his divinity then we would end up depraved and declining, just like we are now, being told by the Muslims that Christianity (which is faith-heavy and schismatic) could be improved by, well, Islam (which is faith-lite and unifying) ....

Up to 1813, it was a crime to deny the trinity in public.

While we are appalled by the Muslims and their penchant for beheading as a form of execution, Christians got up to much worse when they were in charge: hanging, drawing and quartering as well as burning at the stake.

Beheading, being swiftly over, was comparatively humane. However, in England this form of humanity was reserved only for its aristocracy. Commoners would be hanged to die of slow strangulation to prolong the crowd's pleasure. The last beheading in England was in 1747.

The need for blasphemy laws in Christianity was simply because that while people were happy enough to believe in God, they really could not bring themselves to believe that Jesus is a 3-in-1 deity.

But if one believed in a unitarian God, the Church authorities thought, then one is not much different to being a Jew or a Muslim, whom Christians loathe and fear.

Unitarian Christians - those who thought like Jews and Muslims that Christ was a man and not divine - were persecuted as badly as Jews and Muslims during the Spanish Inquisition.

Arabs and Jews are a Semitic people and anti-Semitism is peculiar to European Christians. It is not so much a race thing as an ideological thing. "We must be different to the people we oppress and despise" was always the "Christian" position.

It continues to this day: but under a different guise: one hates the people whom one has wronged. There were the Crusades of course, the Inquisition, the Holocaust, and, most recently, the robbing of Peter to pay Paul that occurred when the State of Israel was established.