The brain drain of the white race

Pity Western Man, now so terrified of being falsely and maliciously accused of a historic sexual offence and so trigger-happy that he will shoot anyone in front of him, even one who is attempting to defend him.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

Those who are not afraid to challenge the matriarchy are intellectual mediocrities, low status under-educated men who condemn themselves the moment they open their mouths with their rabid racism, antisemitism and Islamophobia, bad grammar, regional accent and beta male persona.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

Unmarriageable atheist bachelors AKA MGTOW are the other half of the problem of matriarchy. Unmarriageable men means increased bastardy which means more tolerance of bastardy and fornicating sluts meaning more and more of the same until an Islamic takeover, I suppose.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

In a matriarchy, all men are beta males subject to the whims of the fornicating slut and unmarried mother. The instantly alpha male would be a man of requisite status and charisma prepared to challenge and defeat it. No one man with anything to lose at all will come forward.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

The fact that no man with anything to lose will emerge to challenge the matriarchy is because such a man would already know he cannot rely on the loyalty of the beta males below, who are not only low status, but men of infamous for their disloyalty and inability to follow orders.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

Proletarian white males complaining about immigration are mostly fatherless low-skilled socially retarded with some behavioural problem usually caused by drug/drink-dependency. No one in nationalism would even dare deny this. No marriage, no family values, no religion, no morals.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

No morals, no male solidarity, no co-operation possible to deal with the eternal enemies of society and civilisation: sluts and socialists who have a symbiotic relationship. This means there is only a degenerate culture no sane and moral immigrant would want to integrate into.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

And so this, in a nutshell, is why the white man's status in his own land has become progressively lower (pun intended) over the decades. The immigrant male knows white men are too afraid to challenge their own women and too divided to protest effectively.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

Because their own women reject them, they turn gay to get cheap sex from each other. Soon they will grow old and die without issue and descendants and wonder what happened to their lives and their country, blaming Jews, Muslims and foreigners as they breathe their last.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

You don't know what you've got till it's gone. Can you imagine such men restoring the patriarchy or restoring the patriarchy with such low status degenerate unmarriageable leaderless men whom no one wants to lead? They are indeed being warehoused for extinction.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

In the meantime, what are white women to do? The marriageable of them will try to marry marriageable men, and they will not be men of their own race whom they already despise: feminised and impoverished.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

What about marriageable white men already aware of the moral devastation wreaked by feminism? They'll reject white women. I recently heard of Asian Aryanism, a term used for white nationalists who reject white women and take up with Oriental women because of their sensible views.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

To secure their own reproductive rights within their own lifetimes, white men and women feel they have to mate with other races in order to have legitimate progeny and bring them up with a spouse who believes in family values. This is the deadly reality of racial degeneracy.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

Are you surprised that "mainstream" alt-right YouTubers such as @MillennialWoes and @MarkACollett won't discuss any of this with me? I have the solution but it is what their subscribers cannot bear to hear, so they promulgate race war or urge some form of displacement activity.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

I hope to demonstrate that the principles of nationalism are the same for every race and nation: patriarchy supported by marriage using a moral system whose laws support marriage. This can only mean Islam if you are a gentile in the West, because Christianity is kaput.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

I have been saying for years that sluts and socialists are the eternal enemies of society and the only protection against this is the practice of slut-shaming that is required by any religion that promotes patriarchal moral values. These would be the five world religions, but as you know, all religions can be subverted once they ignore their own rules and people either don't notice or don't care.

The sexually-liberated atheist is more prone to doing this than a Jew or a Muslim because Jews and Muslims are more likely to know about the prohibition against premarital sex than the atheist, even if they do not agree with it.

The trouble with nationalists is that they are atheist antisemites and Islamophobes who would rather die than even be seen to be investigating the religion of those they hate and fear with any show of objective impartiality.

Everything about feminism undermines marriage. Patriarchy cannot exist without marriage. Without the patriarchy, not enough good strong men will be produced to defend the national interest. If Western men were mostly Christian husbands and fathers of legitimate offspring, they wouldn't and needn't put up with the matriarchy for even a minute.

Without the family and a functioning religion, men are atomised and competing against each other for the sexual favours of immoral women, incapable of co-operating with each other to deal with their internal enemies: sluts and socialists.

Without patriarchy there is no hierarchy and therefore no accountability.

A matriarchy is basically buck-passing politicians who will blame other buck-passing politicians where the apparent leader is really not in control of anything and cannot rely on the loyalty of beta males to support him. This makes him cowardly, hesitant and cautious and also means nothing much will be done in Trump's term of office.

Without patriarchy, no one in a senior political position will stick his neck out to defend the beta males below. Enoch Powell and Keith Joseph tried to point out the obvious, but had their careers destroyed.

Because courage and truth is not rewarded, no more politicians will speak it on your behalves.

Not only is pointing out the obvious unrewarded, it will get you ignored even by the people who are supposed to be on your side who cannot bear to accept the truth either.

The problem with atheism is that the atheist can only think in terms of his own life and does not care what happens after he is dead, especially if he has no biological investment in the next generation.

Most white nationalists are atheist unmarriageable bachelors which means they are easily intimidated and bribed.

Without religion, there is no possibility of enjoying the inter-generational co-operation that Jews and Muslims enjoy which means each generation of nationalists has to more or less reinvent the wheel.

Often, I feel that nationalists of the previous generation would actually hate to see the younger generation succeed where they have failed.

As far as the younger generation are concerned, they are now so atomised that they cannot form a political party or even discuss anything other than what they imagine their YouTube subscribers want to hear.

And this is why none of them will talk to me. It is abuse of power really, but they don't see anything wrong with that either.

If you really are a political activist, you owe it to your cause to seek the truth and operate on logic, guided by your principles. This is the very least that is required.

Sexual corruption leads to moral corruption.

Moral corruption leads to intellectual corruption.

Intellectual corruption leads to the inability to form logical conclusions based on indisputable facts and solve political problems guided by moral principles. Only those from a religious background practising family values would have internalised the categorical imperative to have principles and follow them. The illegitimate, singly parented and the badly schooled will find this almost impossible to do, however patient you are with him. Believe me, I have tried.

The degenerate who has difficulty understanding the nature and purpose of principles will have greater difficulty applying them if they their morality is non-existent. Most of them will have difficulty even recognising a situation when the exercise of principle is required, because they are accustomed to responding instinctively and thoughtlessly to the promptings of their baser appetites. If sex is offered, they will take it, even if they have already said they are not looking for a relationship and would even agree with you that immoral women who are also bad parents of illegitimate offspring cause the social problems of immigration they are always complaining about.

Such degenerates are only left with denial, apathy and the stated intention to leave the country if it all gets too much to bear.  

Why don't MGTOW demand the abolition of no fault divorce? Because they are only interested in revenge

Why don't anti-feminists demand the abolition of no fault divorce? It is easy to say and easy to understand. No one should be allowed to marry until they have signed a marriage contract. Refusing to have sex with your spouse and being sterile would void the marriage contract. As for frequency of sex, the parties could agree between themselves how often to have sex. Marital rape is still possible if the husband has exceeded his quota of sex for that week or month. I really think this is fair enough.

Why don't they though?

Because they are beta males who have had the stuffing knocked out of them and know they are no longer marriageable because they are no longer young and attractive and have had their earning power crippled by divorce. They don't even want to have a relationship with a woman, let alone remarry, and so cannot be expected to defend marriage.

It is more lucrative to bitch like women as MGTOW on their YouTube channel rather than have a practical solution to this problem. Beta males are not leaders and have, like women, only the power to withhold. Being mostly atheists, these beta male victims of feminism don't care about what happens to their civilisation even if they have sons. Proposing a practical solution like abolishing no fault divorce would be boring and unprofitable in terms of YouTube likes.

Basically, they are men so embittered by their experience of women they don't want to have anything to do with one again, not even hire a prostitute.

Claire Khaw's Faustian Pact - to be made - with White Nationalists

‎Claire Khaw‎ to Mark Collett

10 mins · 

And this is why most women should be disenfranchised. Is any nationalist prepared to discuss this? Probably not if he has a girlfriend or a wife. I am prepared to do this on their behalf though. I have neither a wife nor a girlfriend to upset.

Curt Doolittle

6 hrs · 

Someone the other day said that women never admit they're wrong, or that they've screwed up. And that's been bothering me, because I didn't realize that I subconsciously recognize that when I'm dealing with a woman, that unless she's asking me a question, she will never admit anything. And so I just don't work that hard and dismiss her.

This is not true of all women, but it's true of the kind of woman that can't exit her solipsism (emotionalism) and rationally determine the truth or falsehood of an argument independent of her feelings about it.

it must be very hard for women to manage their emotions. I can only for a millisecond a few times a year imagine what it is like to think like a woman and it terrifies me. I would feel totally out of control.

My offer to white nationalists about speaking on their behalf on feminism

Why white people are suffering an existential crisis

There are only two kinds of morality because there are only two sexes

Why men will never get back their country again as long as democratic politicians keep chasing the female vote

In a matriarchy, older and wiser heterosexual men are lower in status to the bimbo and gay man

Claire Khaw's Class and Gender Theory of Western Decline

MGTOW IS FREEDOM is the man with the alpha male leadership qualities I find most impressive.

In the face of feminist threats to his job from his ex-wife, ex-girlfriends, ex-female friends and ex-male friends, he is doubling down and not backing down, and is instead threatening to sue the feminist bitches.

Like, subscribe and donate.

Yes, John/MGTOWisFreedom, you should get better at social media.

Wouldn't it be great if he became the next President of the United States?

Tweets by MGTOWisFREEDOM

Questions I was asked about feminism

Q.  Why are you not a feminist?

A.   Because I am not immoral, evil, selfish, stupid and irrational. Feminism encourages women to be promiscuous women and such women should be discouraged for the good of your civilisation and the long term national interest. All feminists assume the right of women to have premarital sex and these promiscuous women are the soldiers of feminism who corrupt the morals of men by bribing them with fornication. The conquest is now successful and complete. You won't find a single senior white Western male politician prepared to uncompromisingly support marriage. Not even won't senior politicians discuss this, no senor academic will discuss this either, and certainly no senior nationalist.

These pathetic white nationalist men who complain about being exploited by Jews and invaded by Muslims are actually too afraid to marry women of their own race because they know the rules of no fault divorce would financially eviscerate them the moment their wife is bored or irritated, or has a political disagreement with their husbands.

Q.  What do you think about patriarchy?

A.  All advanced civilisations are patriarchies, all declining and primitive societies are matriarchies. Why would someone who lives in an advanced civilisation want to live in a primitive society or be degenerate? Only the degenerate. I don't want to be degenerate.

They could be talking about the abolition of no fault divorce or why marriage is eugenic and bastard dysgenic, but they prefer to blame Jews and Muslims who piss on them from on high that they are too venal and sex-addicted to give up because they already know they are unmarriageable and are too atomised to co-operate with each other to organise a revolution or an effective political movement.

Having just seen how Trump has utterly betrayed them, they have had the stuffing knocked out of them, yet again.

They also know they are all beta males and no beta male will accept the authority of another beta male.

These arrogant fuckers just won't accept that they need a religion with patriarchal moral values that supports the institution marriage and think they can get what they want (ie a pogrom against Jews and Muslims and immigrants) without this.

Most of them just hope to die before Western civilisation as they know it collapses anyway.

http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=13&verse=11

God will not change the lot of a people until they change what is in their hearts, says this verse.

What are in the hearts of these degenerate atheist fucktards?

They want to remain MCSFs till the day they die. So sad, when many of them are obviously no longer even sexually active. http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/all-spossms-are-mcsfs-but-not-all-mcsfs.html

So, while they remain in denial in the hope of fucking promiscuous women, or wanting to avoid offending them because these promiscuous women are their daughters, sisters, grandmothers etc, things will continuing going from bad to worse till Western civilisation as we know it collapses.

Q.  What do you think about intersectionality?

A.  Intersectionality is about the acquisition of victimhood as a means of achieving status in a degenerate and declining society. It is a feminine stratagem and useful only for this purpose when your society is already a stinking degenerate matriarchy on its way to hell in a handcart and accelerating fast.

Q. What do you think about rape culture?

A.  As I understand it, the term "rape culture" is about not asking obvious questions of the complainant as to how she came to be raped, as she alleged. Was she drunk? Was she silent and thus indicating consent as her alleged rapist had intercourse with her? Did she by her behaviour indicate that her alleged rapist had reasonable grounds for thinking she was consenting? What was she wearing? If she objected to having sex, why didn't she struggle? The defence is no longer allowed to ask these questions.

Q.  What do you think about objectification?

A.  You mean women as sex objects? Men want to have sex with women, and women want men to give them stuff in return. This is the way of the world.

Q.  What do you think about cat calling?

It is how lower class men indicate their appreciation of a woman's attractiveness when they are in groups.

Q.  What do you think about slut shaming/sex positivity?
A.  Obviously, fornicatresses who are promiscuous women must be shamed to discourage women from being and becoming fornicating promiscuous women and adulteresses. That is the only way to eradicate feminism. Emasculated men enfeebled by half a century of being breast fed premarital sex won't get it together to comprehensively denounce this or uncompromisingly support marriage. It would be like expecting the most degraded drug addict to call the cops on his dealer. That is why a big new idea is necessary to galvanise these degenerate enfeebled emasculated beta male victims of feminism. It is probably too late for them now anyway, but for the sake of good order I will continue to keep pointing this out.

Q.  What do you think about lgbt issues?

A.  LGBT sex is a category of extramarital sex that the Koran forbids.

https://quran.com/4/15

https://quran.com/4/16

Q.  What do you think about minority rights issues?

A.  I think we should be focusing on what form the *dominant culture* should now take. That is the real question. I am interested in being part of the dominant culture and being one of the people who had a hand in the formation of the new dominant culture.

Q.  What do you think about gender discrimination?

A.  We should expect it since everyone exercises it.

Q..  What do you think about misogyny/misandry?

A.  Men and women who have had bad experiences and relationships with the opposite sex will feel bitter and angry. This is less likely to occur in a patriarchy than in the stinking degenerate matriarchy that we have now.

Q.  What do you think about anti feminism/MRAs/MGTOW?

A.  MGTOW is part of the matriarchy.

The only way to solve the problem of feminism is to re-establish the patriarchy.

The only way to re-establish the patriarchy is to see to it that most members of society practise marriage and respect its rules ie no extramarital sex (and this includes premarital and gay sex).

MGTOW not marrying would just exacerbate the degeneracy of criminal bastards who will soon become the majority, making society even more criminal and chaotic.

MRAs who still don't understand this are being willfully blind because they don't want to grasp the nettle of denouncing promiscuous fornicatresses because they want to have sex with women without marrying with them or paying for a prostitute.

Q. What do you think about men's issues?

A. Beta male victims of feminism clearly have many issues with feminism and I have already proposed that it be eradicated with Secular Koranism, because I can't quite see any other system of rules with sufficient moral authority being strong enough to do the job.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

The difference between Roosh and Sandman

Sandman:

Roosh wants to go back to traditionalism. I don't. Sorry feminism and traditionalism are both finished. Time to find a third way that cuts out the woman as "middle man."

CK:

You mean sex bots?

You are just telling as many people as you can to grow old and die alone, but with no cats.

Sandman:

Better then growing old and dying alone after a divorce. At least they can die on a mattress instead of inside their car. I'm talking about surrogacy and sex bots. I think men should have sons and raise them ourselves. That's my plan.

We should do what Christiano Ronaldo and Ricky Martin have done.

CK:

It's going to be a freak, assuming you ever get round to it.
You'd be OK being born the way you are going to birth your son, would you?

Wouldn't knowing that you were conceived like that by a weirdo dad totally fuck you up?

Footballer gets himself a surrogate baby. How many people can afford that?

How much does it cost to have a surrogate baby and then bring it up ON YOUR OWN?

Are there any self-help books on how to raise your very own MGTOW surrogate baby?

Hey, you could really make a killing if you wrote the first one!

That could be followed by a sequel HOW TO DEAL WITH YOUR SURROGATE ADOLESCENT SON DURING HIS TERRIBLE TEENS

Then you could write another one: HOW TO DEAL WITH YOUR RAGE AND DISAPPOINTMENT WHEN YOUR SURROGATE SON GOES HIS OWN WAY AWAY FROM YOU AND MARRIES A FEMINIST

Then another book can be HOW TO DEAL WITH THE HORROR OF HAVING A SURROGATE SON WHO IS A SERIAL KILLER OF MGTOWs

Sandman:

what a happy future serial killer 

CK:

I see MGTOW *not* spending any $40k they might happen to have on getting themselves a baby, even if they thought they really really really wanted a baby son ....

Sandman:

Well I've put the money aside and it's sitting there to be used for that purpose. It's cheaper then a wedding. Might as well just skip the Bridezilla.

Why the beta male needs Islam

Beta males will never get female attention if it is OK for women to have premarital sex.

If you want beta males to have a reasonable chance of finding a wife who will bear and bring up his children and stay with him, then society must

a) shame sluts with 24:2 of the Koran  quran.com/24/2

b) repeal all anti-discrimination legislation

c) abolish no fault divorce.

Beta male victims of feminism are just not up to asking for this, or, if they do ask for this, of getting it for themselves.

THAT IS WHY ONLY ISLAM IS THE ANSWER FOR BETA MALES TO HAVE A REASONABLE CHANCE OF FINDING A WIFE WHO WON'T DIVORCE HIM THE MOMENT SHE GETS BORED AND IRRITATED BY HIM, TAKE HALF HIS STUFF, KICK HIM OUT OF THE MATRIMONIAL HOME AND DEPRIVE HIM OF HIS CHILDREN.

If you were female and forced to choose, whose children would you bear?

a) A MGTOW who will never marry you
b) A jihadi warrior who has married you under Islamic law

The purpose of this question is to prove that even feminists who hate Islam and the patriarchy it stands for would still rather have the legitimate offspring of a jihadi warrior than be impregnated by a loser beta male. 

Which is worse: MGTOW or Islamic State?

MGTOW = men who fuck sluts and will never marry

Sluts have turned Western men into MGTOWs and pre-MGTOWs. 

MGTOWs if they could would rather not have anything to do with women at all and have sex with sexbots instead. MGTOWs who want children would pay a surrogate. Can you imagine what the human society would be like after just two generations of this? Yep, this is the road to perdition that feminism has embarked on.

Guardian feminazi Jessica Valenti who blocked me on Twitter got a mention at 

When that finishes, keep it running to learn the full horror of MGTOW.

MGTOW BAD STUFF

Sandman:

"I want to be a part of the game changer which I think will be a combination of sex doll, oculus rift and filmed pornography. So with that being said I'm starting to research into the feasibility of building my own love doll with sensors in it that allows a man to interact with it while wearing an oculus rift headset. And have the actress respond with pre-recorded video footage when you touch the doll while wearing the headset. The sensors built into the doll will connect to the software and be interactive. I believe those three elements working together would be revolutionary. My academic background is in the development of new media technologies. That's what my degree is in and I'm glad that I can finally put that to some use. Isn't it ironic that I want to use ideas taught to me by feminist professors to spread feminism are now going to be used by me to liberate men. I want to call the system "The Liberator Doll." It's not just a doll but an interactive visual, physical and auditory experience. I want to install heaters in the unit to make it feel as warm as human flesh. I want it to have vagina sleeves that are not only easy to wash and maintain but also move and stimulate you better then the real thing. Think of it like taking your car through a car wash. Except in this case it would be a cock wash. The first step to making this happen is getting Oculus rift and making some content for it."

ISLAMIC STATE BAD STUFF

It is the “fundamental function” of a woman to be in the house with her husband and children, the jihadi guide says, adding that they may leave the house to serve the community only in exceptional circumstances – to wage jihad when there are no men available, to study religion, and female doctors and teachers are permitted to leave but “must keep strictly to sharia guidelines”. “Yes, we say: ‘Stay in your houses’, but this does not mean, in any way, that we support illiteracy, backwardness or ignorance,” the English-language translation reads. “Rather, we just support the distinction between working – that which involves a woman leaving the house – and studying, as it was ordained she should do.”

"Unmarried women are kept in a safe house, usually with others who speak their language and given religious indoctrination and Arabic classes while a husband is found for them as quickly as possible."

My interpretation of that wife-beating verse 4:34

Verse in Koran implicitly accepts the existence of brothels

Feminists want prostitutes dead while the Koran tolerates brothel-keeping

Julie Bindel and Belinda Brooks-Gordon discuss decriminalising prostitution and my Koranic solution

Institutions cannot be banned, only regulated

I propose a middle way: making it a requirement for those contemplating marriage to agree a marriage contract to abolish no fault divorce and repealing all totalitarian thoughtcrime feminist legislation viz The Equality Act 2010. 

Oh, and quran.com/24/2

The children of Islamic State would mostly not be bastards, but Western nations left only with sluts mating with MGTOWs would have mostly bastards for the next generation, who will be even more bastard and slut with each subsequent generation. 

Of the following, whose long term survival is more assured?

a) a society of mostly of bastards whose parents are SSMs (Slut Single Mothers) who are serially sexually abused by a string of their unfit mother's sexually abusive boyfriends (This social phenomenon together with free online porn and the morally rotten ideology of feminsm is the reason why most people in the West think there is a paedophile under every bush.) 

or

b) a society whose parents are mostly married and whose children are mostly legitimate growing up with their married parents

Sandman's videos are arguments for sex segregation

MGTOW is the terminal cancer you suffer from. Islamic State are just your natural ideological enemies. You are therefore more likely to be killed by the terminal cancer you already have sooner than you are from the harm your natural enemies intend to do to you.

MGTOW explained in tweets

MGTOW is a beta male response to feminism. Would you agree, @SandmanMGTOW?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 23, 2016

MGTOW is beta male victims of feminism trying to get a place in the sun for themselves *within the matriarchy*, right @SandmanMGTOW?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 23, 2016

MGTOW is about beta male victims of feminism making a point of fucking sluts but never marrying them, right, @SandmanMGTOW?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 23, 2016

The best MGTOWs are gay men, because they don't need or want to have sex with women at all. Would you agree, @SandmanMGTOW?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 23, 2016

Gay MGTOWs will always be more effective MGTOWs than heterosexual MGTOWs, right, @SandmanMGTOW?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 23, 2016

While all MGTOWs are anti-feminists, not all anti-feminists are MGTOWs, right, @SandmanMGTOW?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 23, 2016

Who is the better anti-feminist? a) a MGTOW who does not want to shame sluts b) an anti-feminist who wants to shame sluts @SandmanMGTOW

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 23, 2016

If you want to solve the problem of feminism, which ideology is more effective? a) slut-shaming anti-feminism b) MGTOW @SandmanMGTOW

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 23, 2016

Beta males are like women because beta male MGTOWs only have the ability to withhold marriage, but no capacity to overthrow the matriarchy.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 23, 2016

MGTOW beta male victims of feminism can only withhold marriage frm sluts, while an alpha male wd abolish no fault divorce/restore patriarchy

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 23, 2016

All men who call themselves MGTOWs are by definition *beta male* victims of feminism who either cannot or do not wish to become alpha males.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 23, 2016

Why are MGTOWs so despised? Because they have acknowledged that they are (a) beta males and (b) victims of feminism.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 23, 2016

How does a beta male victim of feminism ie MGTOW become an alpha male? By directly and successfully challenging feminism. @SandmanMGTOW

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 23, 2016

MGTOW - palliative care for beta males suffering from the terminal effects of feminism Alpha Male - a leader of beta males in a patriarchy

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 23, 2016

MGTOWs are MCSFs. The MCSF is defined at https://t.co/u1fEKbqa7r

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 23, 2016

MGTOWs are all MCSFs because they expect and hope to have sex with women they are not married to. https://t.co/u1fEKbqa7r

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 23, 2016

Why gay men will always be the most effortlessly successful MGTOWs

https://www.mgtow.com/

The reason why MGTOWs keep talking about women is because they still want to fuck them.

The principle idea about being a MGTOW is heterosexual men having sex with sluts and never marrying them.

A slut is a woman who will fornicate with any man not her husband, and that is now most women in the West.

Even if no fault divorce were abolished, MGTOWs still wouldn't be interested in marriage or in having legitimate children.

They would change their behaviour and consider marriage again if

- no-fault divorce were abolished

- fornicating sluts were shamed and lashed 100 times as 24:2 of the Koran prescribes, noticeably and drastically reducing the supply of sluts for MGTOWs. Then these heterosexual men would find themselves faced with the stark choice of having to take a wife or hiring prostitutes for sex, or going gay, which is the cheapest form of sex.

MGTOWs are mainly unmarriageable men and a social phenomenon with a high rate of beta male participation. This social phenomenon is a reaction to feminism and no fault divorce; in essence, it is beta males waking up to the fact that marriage does not give them a good deal if they can still have sex outside marriage. "Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?" sums up their attitude towards women.

The most successful MGTOWs remain gay men, because they don't need to have any sexual dealings with women at all since they don't want to have sex with them, but with each other. Straight women still respect gay men for their lifestyle choice because gay men tend to look better than heterosexual beta males.

What women despise is low status sub-alpha males they find repellent with no dress sense who want to have sex with them.

The Koran also punishes gay men in 4:16, and I believe it is for this reason: because gay men make no biological contribution towards the gene pool for the next generation. Fornicating MGTOWs are punishable under 24:2 because they lower its quality by siring bastards.

Marriage is eugenic, bastardy dysgenic.

004.016YUSUFALI: If two men among you are guilty of lewdness, punish them both. If they repent and amend, Leave them alone; for Allah is Oft-returning, Most Merciful.PICKTHAL: And as for the two of you who are guilty thereof, punish them both. And if they repent and improve, then let them be. Lo! Allah is ever relenting, Merciful.SHAKIR: And as for the two who are guilty of indecency from among you, give them both a punishment; then if they repent and amend, turn aside from them; surely Allah is Oft-returning (to mercy), the Merciful.

024.002YUSUFALI: The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication,- flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment.PICKTHAL: The adulterer and the adulteress, scourge ye each one of them (with) a hundred stripes. And let not pity for the twain withhold you from obedience to Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day. And let a party of believers witness their punishment.SHAKIR: (As for) the fornicatress and the fornicator, flog each of them, (giving) a hundred stripes, and let not pity for them detain you in the matter of obedience to Allah, if you believe in Allah and the last day, and let a party of believers witness their chastisement.

MGTOW Sandman wants to have sex with sex dolls instead of having sex with women. Surrogacy is his preferred route if he wants to have offspring. How dysgenic are his proposals on a scale of 1 to 10?

MARRIAGE, ITS ABSENCE IN THE WEST AND THE PROBLEM THIS CAUSES

1.  Marriage is for the purpose of having legitimate children.

2.  Marriage is the rearing of the next generation in optimum conditions.

3.  The institution of marriage is what distinguishes humans from lower animals. 

4.  Marriage is a delicate mechanism that man tampers with at his peril.

5.  Marriage was never intended for couples who are not contemplating sexual reproduction or do not have the theoretical possibility of sexual reproduction. (It is a sign of alarming degeneracy that leaders of so many democracies cannot and refuse to see this.)

6.  Monogamy is the pivot upon which true gender justice rests. 

7.  Monogamy was created to protect the beta male, who do the work and fight the wars.

8.  Monogamy was created to keep up the morale of the beta male because, if demoralised, he will cease to work, cease to marry and cease to sire more workers and soldiers for society and your civilisation will decline, become a degenerate matriarchy and eventually be overwhelmed by immigrants or threatened with invasion by Islamic State, as is now the case in the West.

9.  Wives were required to promise to be obedient to husbands not because it was considered that they were inferior, but because the arduous undertaking that is marriage had to be somehow sweetened for the man by such promises.  

10.  It is a true sign of degeneracy that no Western man with sufficient status or seniority, not even the men who say they are Conservatives who say they care about defending their civilisation such as Roger Scruton and Peter Hitchens can bear to discuss any of the above. This is because they fear persecution by feminazis from the state, from their place of employment and of course within their own family, especially their wives. 

Radical multicultural types will in the end destroy the things they claim to like, because they don't understand that liberty and reasonable equality are features of stable, free, conservative societies based on Christian ideas, which guard their borders and are proud of their civilisation.

The people who really want to defend our enlightened society, in the end, are dinosaurs like me.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3392249/PETER-HITCHENS-strong-borders-pride-civilisation-save-now.html

This was two days after Peter Hitchens outed himself as a feminist.

Peter Hitchens on BBC #wato today: "I'm a feminist, of course I am!" Erm... https://t.co/4oWtxwNouA pic.twitter.com/ecXYvfyRM5

— Sunny Hundal (@sunny_hundal) January 8, 2016

11.  Only an alpha male will protect the interests of beta males, but Britain does not have even a single alpha male. David Cameron, who legalised gay marriage, is not an alpha male because he fears what alienating the female vote would do to him and his party. He would never criticise SSMs, because if he did they would go over to Labour at once, because the Left is stuffed with less affluent men who want the price of sex to be reassuringly low. The SSM explained

12.  An alpha male is a man who is not afraid to discuss any of the above because he would know that sluts are lower than him and wouldn't be afraid of them or would know not to show fear by discussing the above in public without fear or favour. The last man who had alpha male aspirations - Keith Joseph - gave a speech in Edgbaston that offended sluts in 1974; his career was destroyed, paving the way for Britain's First Female Prime Minister. 1974 was the year in which the alpha male became extinct in Britain. 

http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/101830

13.  Britain has been without an alpha male for at least 42 years. Can he be brought into existence by an act of will and the will to power, by a man of sufficient seniority and status prepared to discuss the above? Do note that Nigel Farage is planning his TV career after the EU Referendum. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3382294/Nigel-Farage-s-car-wheels-sabotaged-assassination-attempt-Ukip-leader-lost-control-Volvo-wheel-fell-motorway-police-confirm-foul-play.html I rather doubt it because he would have too much to lose. Atheist libtards have no principles and no intention of making sacrifices for any principle they ever claimed to have. 

14.  The only men of sufficient seniority and status are without exception libtards or men like Nigel Farage, Roger Scruton and Peter Hitchens professing to identify with Conservatism, but who have come to an accommodation with the matriarchy. That is why the West is doomed. Islamic State jihadis who have threatened to invade the West and imposing sharia on us are not afraid of offending sluts or of making sacrifices, are they? 

20 Muslims can vanquish 200, 100 Muslims can vanquish 1000. Weakened, 100 Muslims can still vanquish 200, 1000 can vanquish 2000. 8:65-66

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 6, 2016

Why no one cares about beta males victims of feminism

Hi Everyone, I've been asked to do a media interview with a reporter about """MGTOW""" Does anyone have any advice?

— Sandman MGTOW (@SandmanMGTOW) October 7, 2015

Only a beta male would ask this question. An alpha male would know that this is the moment he has been waiting for.

Listen to Sandman's beta male voice.

Better To Die Alone - MGTOW - https://t.co/bVhNRrGvAS

— Sandman MGTOW (@SandmanMGTOW) October 5, 2015

The operation of indiscriminate universal suffrage means the crucial and capricious female vote can't be ignored.

If you want to neutralise the power of the female vote you would have to narrow the franchise.

Dare even the leaders of anti-establishment political parties in the West propose the slaying of sacred cows of feminism and democracy?

Beta males will never accept the authority of another beta male and it is beta males who are the victims of feminism.

There are no principled alpha males who care about the beta male and females *despise* beta males.

Having to settle for a beta male and spend all her life with him fills the feminist with DISGUST and HORROR.

Probably, the feminist would rather kill herself than have to settle for a beta male and bear his children.

The feminist feels such a VISCERAL DISGUST for the beta male she would rather bear the bastard of an alpha than have him as husband now that she knows the state will provide for her. (A few minutes of alpha is better than a lifetime of beta, if the state will sponsor the lifestyle choice of the slut.)

The feminist feels such a VISCERAL DISGUST for the beta male she would rather be lesbian than have him as husband.

The feminist feels such a VISCERAL DISGUST for the beta male she would rather be childless than have him as husband.

The feminist feels such a VISCERAL DISGUST for the beta male she would rather DIE than marry him and remain faithful.

Feminists find beta males as REPULSIVE as men might find repulsive the fattest, ugliest, stupidest smelliest woman.

Feminists would rather suffer the extinction of their race than have to marry an obviously beta male.

Clearly, beta male victims of feminism still cannot find an alpha male prepared to lead and protect them.

Are these beta males so dumb, disorganised, apathetic and inadequate they cannot find themselves an alpha male to lead the fight against feminism?

If beta males victims of feminism cannot bestir themselves to find a decent leader, they deserve to suffer.

If ALL the men of n entire race can't find a single man of charisma to lead them, that race deserves extinction.

Either that race deserves extinction, or the culture that they led them to this pretty pass should be replaced.

All beta male victims of feminism can do is whinge weakly on social media. That is all they ever do.

That not a single man in the entire West dares or is capable of challenging feminism successfully is shameful.

The end cannot be far off when not a single alpha male in the entire West dares to challenge feminism.

Nobody cares about the beta male. Men with alpha male qualities won't give up their privileges to defend despised beta males.

Nobody cares about the beta male. Most women would rather die than have to marry and bear the children of some lowly beta male.

Whingeing apathetic beta males with no masculine qualities are like helpless women.

Even beta males despise other beta males who prefer even the feminazi because they could in theory have sex with her.

All beta males can do is wait patiently like a woman in a tower for some knight in shining armour to rescue them. Pathetic.